Greater Norwich Local Plan Growing Stronger Communities Together Site Proposals Document

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Greater Norwich Local Plan Growing Stronger Communities Together Site Proposals Document Greater Norwich Local Plan Growing Stronger Communities Together Site Proposals document onomy ronm m stru uni Delivery Ec vi en Ho es ra ct mm tie n t f ur o s E In e C Regulation 18 Consultation January 8th – March 15th 2018 Working with Greater Norwich Local Plan Site Proposals document Contents Page Page 1 Introduction 5 2 Settlement Summaries and Sites 12 3 • Broadland 12 Horsford 56 Acle o o 16 Horsham & Newton St. Faiths 61 Attlebridge o o 17 Horstead & Stanninghall 64 Aylsham o o 21 Lingwood & Burlingham 65 Beighton o o 22 Marsham 68 Blofield o o 24 Panxworth 71 Blofield Heath o o 26 Postwick 72 Brundall o o 28 Rackheath 75 Buxton with Lamas o o 30 Reedham 78 Cantley o o 31 Reepham 79 Cawston o o 33 Salhouse 83 Coltishall & Horstead o o 35 South Walsham 87 Crostwick o o 36 Spixworth 89 Drayton o o 40 Sprowston 90 Felthorpe o o 41 Strumpshaw 94 Foulsham o o 43 Taverham 96 Frettenham o o 44 Thorpe St. Andrew 98 Gt & Lt Plumstead o o 47 Weston Longville 101 Gt Witchingham & Lenwade o o 49 Woodbastwick 102 Hainford o o 51 Wroxham 103 Hellesdon o o 53 Hevingham o 54 o Honningham 2 4 • Norwich 105 5 • South Norfolk 125 X 125 226 o Alpington & Yelverton Hingham 126 o 230 o Ashby St Mary Keswick 127 o 232 o Aslacton Ketteringham 130 o 234 o Ashwellthorpe & Fundenhall Kirby Cane 132 o 236 o Barford Little Melton 134 o 240 o Barnham Broom Loddon & Chedgrave 136 o 244 o Bawburgh Long Stratton 139 o 247 o Bergh Apton Marlingford & Colton 142 o 250 o Bixley Morley 144 o 252 o Bracon Ash Mulbarton 147 o 254 o Bramerton Mundham 148 o 255 o Bressingham Needham 149 o 257 o Brockdish (inc Thorpe Abbotts) Newton Flotman 150 o 259 o Brooke Norton Subcourse 153 o 260 o Broome Poringland 155 o 265 o Bunwell Pulham Market 158 o 267 o Burston and Shimpling Pulham St Mary 160 o 270 o Caistor St Edmund Rockland St Mary 162 o 272 o Carleton Rode Roydon 164 o 274 o Chedgrave Saxlingham Nethergate 164 o 275 o Claxton Scole 165 o 278 o Colney Seething 168 o 280 o Costessey Shelfanger 173 o 282 o Cringleford Swardeston 176 o 284 o Denton Spooner Row 177 o 289 o Dickleburgh & Rushall Stockton Diss 181 o 290 o o Stoke Holy Cross 3 o Ditchingham 186 o Surlingham 292 o Earsham 189 o Swainsthorpe 294 o East Carleton 191 o Swardeston 296 o Easton 193 o Tacolneston & Forncett End 298 o Ellingham 195 o Tasburgh 301 o Flordon 197 o Tharston & Hapton 303 o Forncett 198 o Thurlton & Norton Subcourse 305 o Framingham Earl & Framingham Pigot 201 o Thurton & Ashby St Mary 307 o Geldeston 203 o Tibenham 309 o Gillingham 205 o Tivetshall St Mary 310 o Gissing 207 o Toft Monks 312 o Great Melton 208 o Trowse 314 o Great Moulton 209 o Wicklewood 315 o Haddiscoe 211 o Winfarthing 318 o Hales & Heckingham 213 o Woodton 319 o Harleston 215 o Wortwell 322 o Hempnall 218 o Wreningham 324 o Hethersett 221 o Wymondham 326 6 Settlement and site maps Parish wide and site specific maps covering submitted sites, commitment sites, current development boundaries and parish boundaries are available from www.gnlp.org.uk. “Interactive” maps are also available from the web site. Hard copies are available at Deposit Points (County Hall, City Hall, South Norfolk Council and Broadland District Council receptions). 4 Introduction 1.1. This document, the Site Proposals document, forms part of the Regulation 18 consultation on the emerging Greater Norwich Local Plan (GNLP). It covers sites and development boundaries. It accompanies the main consultation document, the Growth Options document, which covers the strategic plan approach. Section 5 of the Growth Options document sets the background to the consultation on sites. 1.2. At this stage no decisions have been made about which sites should or should not be included in the emerging plan; however, where sites have been assessed, this document, and the supporting evidence in the Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (HELAA) give an early indication about their possible suitability. 1.3. One of the assumptions underlying the GNLP is that sites that already have planning permission or are allocated for housing in current local plans will be built by 2036; however, we are testing those assumptions through this consultation. 1.4. Consequently, within this document we are asking for your views on: • Sites of over 0.25 hectares which have been submitted for possible inclusion in the GNLP between 16 May 2016 and 31 July 2017, all of which have undergone a preliminary assessment; • Current development boundaries/limits from the existing local plans1. Within the main Growth Options document, we have also asked questions on: • Existing allocations and planning permissions for housing, which are known as the existing commitment (question 8); • The key employment sites across the Greater Norwich Area, as identified in the GNLP Employment, Town Centres and Retail Study 2017 (questions 27 to 30). 1 The existing development boundaries/limits are taken from: Broadland Site Allocations DPD (2016); Old Catton, Sprowston, Rackheath & Thorpe St Andrew Growth Triangle Area Action Plan (July 2016); Norwich Site Allocations and Site Specific Policies Local Plan (December 2014); South Norfolk Site Specific Allocation and Policies Document (October 2015); Long Stratton Area Action Plan (May 2016); Wymondham Area Action Plan (October 2015); & Cringleford Neighbourhood Development Plan (February 2014). 5 1.5. As well as seeking views on the sites already identified, it is also possible that you may wish to put forward additional sites which you consider would be as good as, or better than those already identified; this is your opportunity to do that (see question 3 of this document below). 1.6. The main Growth Options consultation document asks various questions about the how much growth is likely to be needed between now and 2036. Question 3 covers jobs growth and questions 4 to 6 housing growth. Consequently no decisions have been made yet as to precisely how much land is needed to accommodate the additional development. The Growth Options document also sets out various possibilities for how the total growth will be distributed, with questions 9 to 12 covering this issue. The Growth Options include particular areas (such as transport corridors); or particular types of settlement (e.g. concentrated in larger towns or dispersed to a range of smaller villages); or whether a new settlement is a viable component of future growth. Consequently, at this stage, no conclusions can be drawn about which sites should to go forward into the GNLP until the amount and pattern of growth has been established. This sites consultation provides the opportunity for you to comment on the sites that have been submitted and to identify other potential sites for growth. To assist you in making your comments, it provides information on sites submitted by settlement and points you to individual site assessments done through the HELAA. 2. Settlement Summaries and Sites 2.1. Set out below in this document are a series of site details and settlement summaries, with accompanying maps available via the GNLP website at www.gnlp.org.uk : • site details are listed under the parish within which they fall (or within which the majority of the site falls); • you can make comments on the submitted sites online via the GNLP website, with interactive maps for each submitted site also available to help you (see paragraph 2.10 below for further detail); • sites are also illustrated in map booklets for each parish/town/city available via the GNLP website. Each map booklet contains an overall map for the parish, followed by a series of individual site maps. We have tried to show as much context as possible, therefore sites which are outside the parish, but close to the boundary, should also be clearly evident from the maps. • Hard copies of the maps and all other consultation documents are also available from the consultation deposit points: o County Hall, Martineau Lane, Norwich (main reception); nd o City Hall, St Peters Street, Norwich (2 floor reception); o Broadland District Council, Thorpe Road, Thorpe St Andrew (main reception); o South Norfolk Council, Cygnet Court, Long Stratton (main reception). 6 • as the title suggests, the settlement summaries have been written on a settlement basis, rather than a parish basis. Therefore, where a site clearly relates to a settlement in an adjoining parish, because of proximity and because future residents would use the services and facilities in that settlement, the site has been included within the summary for that settlement. For example, the settlement summary for Poringland includes several sites which are listed under the parishes of Caistor St Edmund, Framingham Earl, Framingham Pigot, and Stoke Holy Cross, but which are shown on the maps for both the parish they are in and are also shown on the overall parish map for Poringland. Where possible, where the sites details and the summary of the site appear under different parishes, we have tried to cross-reference these as clearly as possible. Proposed Sites 2.2. Basic site details are set out for all sites submitted up to 31 July 2017. The site details set out the location of the site, who has proposed it and what they would like it considered for. Whilst we have tried to take into account what the site has been proposed for, where sites have been proposed for specific house numbers the assessment will take into account the potential for housing development at the densities set out in the HELAA methodology, in order to make the assessment of sites consistent.
Recommended publications
  • Agenda for the Convenience of Members of the Public
    Please Contact: Emma Denny Please email: [email protected] Please Direct Dial on: 01263 516010 24th November 2017 A meeting of the Cabinet of North Norfolk District Council will be held in the Council Chamber at the Council Offices, Holt Road, Cromer on Monday 4th December 2017 at 10.00am At the discretion of the Chairman, a short break will be taken after the meeting has been running for approximately one and a half hours Members of the public who wish to ask a question or make a statement item are requested to notify the committee clerk 24 hours in advance of the meeting and arrive at least 15 minutes before the start of the meeting. This is to allow time for the Committee Chair to rearrange the order of items on the agenda for the convenience of members of the public. Further information on the procedure for public speaking can be obtained from Democratic Services, Tel: 01263 516010, Email: [email protected] Anyone attending this meeting may take photographs, film or audio-record the proceedings and report on the meeting. Anyone wishing to do so should inform the Chairman. If you are a member of the public and you wish to speak on an item on the agenda, please be aware that you may be filmed or photographed. Emma Denny Democratic Services Manager To: Mrs S Arnold, Mrs A Claussen-Reynolds, Mr N Dixon, Mr T FitzPatrick, Mr J Lee, Mrs J Oliver, Mr W Northam, Miss B Palmer, Mr R Price, Ms M Prior All other Members of the Council for information.
    [Show full text]
  • The Local Government Boundary Commision for England Electoral Review of South Norfolk
    SHEET 1, MAP 1 THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISION FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW OF SOUTH NORFOLK E Final recommendations for ward boundaries in the district of South Norfolk March 2017 Sheet 1 of 1 OLD COSTESSEY COSTESSEY CP EASTON CP D C This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of the Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majestry's Stationary Office @ Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil preceedings. NEW COSTESSEY The Local Governement Boundary Commision for England GD100049926 2017. B Boundary alignment and names shown on the mapping background may not be up to date. They may differ from the latest Boundary information MARLINGFORD AND COLTON CP applied as part of this review. BAWBURGH CP BRANDON PARVA, COSTON, A RUNHALL AND WELBORNE CP EASTON BARNHAM BROOM CP BARFORD CP COLNEY CP HETHERSETT TROWSE WITH LITTLE MELTON CP NEWTON CP SURLINGHAM CP GREAT MELTON CP KIRBY BEDON CP CRINGLEFORD WRAMPLINGHAM CP CRINGLEFORD CP KIMBERLEY CP HETHERSETT CP BIXLEY CP WICKLEWOOD BRAMERTON CP ROCKLAND ST MARY CP KESWICK AND INTWOOD CP PORINGLAND, ROCKLAND FRAMINGHAM FRAMINGHAMS & TROWSE PIGOT CP H CAISTOR ST EDMUND CP H CLAXTON CP NORTH WYMONDHAM P O P C L C M V A E H R R C S E G T IN P O T ER SWARDESTON CP N HELLINGTON E T FRAMINGHAM YELVERTON P T CP KE EARL CP CP T S N O T E G EAST CARLETON CP L WICKLEWOOD CP F STOKE HOLY CROSS CP ASHBY ST MARY CP R A C ALPINGTON CP HINGHAM CP PORINGLAND CP LANGLEY WITH HARDLEY CP HINGHAM & DEOPHAM CENTRAL
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Through a Lens
    NORFOLK THROUGH A LENS A guide to the Photographic Collections held by Norfolk Library & Information Service 2 NORFOLK THROUGH A LENS A guide to the Photographic Collections held by Norfolk Library & Information Service History and Background The systematic collecting of photographs of Norfolk really began in 1913 when the Norfolk Photographic Survey was formed, although there are many images in the collection which date from shortly after the invention of photography (during the 1840s) and a great deal which are late Victorian. In less than one year over a thousand photographs were deposited in Norwich Library and by the mid- 1990s the collection had expanded to 30,000 prints and a similar number of negatives. The devastating Norwich library fire of 1994 destroyed around 15,000 Norwich prints, some of which were early images. Fortunately, many of the most important images were copied before the fire and those copies have since been purchased and returned to the library holdings. In 1999 a very successful public appeal was launched to replace parts of the lost archive and expand the collection. Today the collection (which was based upon the survey) contains a huge variety of material from amateur and informal work to commercial pictures. This includes newspaper reportage, portraiture, building and landscape surveys, tourism and advertising. There is work by the pioneers of photography in the region; there are collections by talented and dedicated amateurs as well as professional art photographers and early female practitioners such as Olive Edis, Viola Grimes and Edith Flowerdew. More recent images of Norfolk life are now beginning to filter in, such as a village survey of Ashwellthorpe by Richard Tilbrook from 1977, groups of Norwich punks and Norfolk fairs from the 1980s by Paul Harley and re-development images post 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (Are Distinguished by Letter Code, Given Below) Those from 1801-13 Have Also Been Transcribed and Have No Code
    Norfolk Family History Society Norfolk Marriages 1801-1837 The contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (are distinguished by letter code, given below) those from 1801-13 have also been transcribed and have no code. ASt All Saints Hel St. Helen’s MyM St. Mary in the S&J St. Simon & St. And St. Andrew’s Jam St. James’ Marsh Jude Aug St. Augustine’s Jma St. John McC St. Michael Coslany Ste St. Stephen’s Ben St. Benedict’s Maddermarket McP St. Michael at Plea Swi St. Swithen’s JSe St. John Sepulchre McT St. Michael at Thorn Cle St. Clement’s Erh Earlham St. Mary’s Edm St. Edmund’s JTi St. John Timberhill Pau St. Paul’s Etn Eaton St. Andrew’s Eth St. Etheldreda’s Jul St. Julian’s PHu St. Peter Hungate GCo St. George Colegate Law St. Lawrence’s PMa St. Peter Mancroft Hei Heigham St. GTo St. George Mgt St. Margaret’s PpM St. Peter per Bartholomew Tombland MtO St. Martin at Oak Mountergate Lak Lakenham St. John Gil St. Giles’ MtP St. Martin at Palace PSo St. Peter Southgate the Baptist and All Grg St. Gregory’s MyC St. Mary Coslany Sav St. Saviour’s Saints The 25 Suffolk parishes Ashby Burgh Castle (Nfk 1974) Gisleham Kessingland Mutford Barnby Carlton Colville Gorleston (Nfk 1889) Kirkley Oulton Belton (Nfk 1974) Corton Gunton Knettishall Pakefield Blundeston Cove, North Herringfleet Lound Rushmere Bradwell (Nfk 1974) Fritton (Nfk 1974) Hopton (Nfk 1974) Lowestoft Somerleyton The Norfolk parishes 1 Acle 36 Barton Bendish St Andrew 71 Bodham 106 Burlingham St Edmond 141 Colney 2 Alburgh 37 Barton Bendish St Mary 72 Bodney 107 Burlingham
    [Show full text]
  • County Town Title Film/Fiche # Item # Norfolk Benefices, List Of
    County Town Title Film/Fiche # Item # Norfolk Benefices, List of 1471412 It 44 Norfolk Census 1851 Index 6115160 Norfolk Church Records 1725-1812 1526807 It 1 Norfolk Marriage Allegations Index 1811-1825 375230 Norfolk Marriage Allegations Index 1825-1839 375231 Norfolk Marriage Allegations Index 1839-1859 375232 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1715-1734 1596461 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1734-1749 1596462 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1770-1774 1596563 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1774-1781 1596564 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1790-1797 1596566 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1798-1803 1596567 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1812-1819 1596597 Norfolk Marriages Parish Registers 1539-1812 496683 It 2 Norfolk Probate Inventories Index 1674-1825 1471414 It 17-20 Norfolk Tax Assessments 1692-1806 1471412 It 30-43 Norfolk Wills V.101 1854-1857 167184 Norfolk Alburgh Parish Register Extracts 1538-1715 894712 It 5 Norfolk Alby Parish Records 1600-1812 1526778 It 15 Norfolk Aldeby Church Records 1725-1812 1526786 It 6 Norfolk Alethorpe Census 1841 438859 Norfolk Arminghall Census 1841 438862 Norfolk Ashby Church Records 1725-1812 1526786 It 7 Norfolk Ashby Parish Register Extracts 1646 894712 It 5 Norfolk Ashwell-Thorpe Census 1841 438851 Norfolk Aslacton Census 1841 438851 Norfolk Baconsthorpe Parish Register Extracts 1676-1770 894712 It 6 Norfolk Bagthorpe Census 1841 438859 Norfolk Bale Census 1841 438862 Norfolk Bale Parish Register Extracts 1538-1716 894712 It 6 Norfolk Barmer Census 1841 438859 Norfolk Barney Census 1841 438859 Norfolk Barton-Bendish Church Records 1725-1812 1526807 It
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan
    Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report May 2021 Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report LC- 654 Document Control Box Client South Norfolk Council Habitats Regulations Assessment Report Title Regulation 18 – HRA Report Status FINAL Filename LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Date May 2021 Author SC Reviewed ND Approved ND Photo: Female broad bodied chaser by Shutterstock Regulation 18 – HRA Report May 2021 LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of this report ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2 The South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................... 3 2.1 Greater Norwich Local Plan .................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................................ 3 2.3 Village Clusters ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Owner of the Site 1C. Client / Landowner Details (If Different from Your Login Account)
    1b. I am... - Owner of the site 1c. Client / Landowner Details (if different from your login account) 2. Site Details Site location / address and post code. (at the end of this form you will be able to plot the site on a map as part of your submission) Cherry Tree Farm Woodrow lane Great Moulton Norfolk NR15 2HZ Grid reference (if known) 616172,289727 3. Site Ownership 3a. I (or my client)... Is the sole owner of the site 3b. Please provide the name, address and contact details of the site's landowner(s) John Poole Lucinda Poole 4. Current and Historic Land Uses 4a. Current Land Use (Please describe the site’s current land use e.g. agriculture, employment, unused/vacant etc.) Garden 4b. Has the site been previously No developed? 4c. Describe any previous uses of the site. (please provide details of any relevant historic planning applications, including application numbers if known) Garden 5. Proposed Future Uses 5a. Please provide a short description of the development or land use you proposed (if you are proposing a site to be designated as local green space please go directly to question 6) Residential properties, some retail outlets and flats above. 5b. Which of the following use or uses are - Market Housing you proposing? - Affordable Housing - Business and offices 5c. Please provide further details of your proposal, including details on number of houses and proposed floorspace of commercial buildings etc. Proposal for 16 houses, a row of 3 shops units around 500 sq ft each with parking and flats above. 5d.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Norwich Development Partnership
    Joint Core Strategy for Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk Public Consultation Regulation 25 March 2009 Public Consultation - Regulation 25, March 2009 IMPORTANT NOTE – development of this document In 2007 and early 2008 the Greater Norwich Development Partnership (GNDP) undertook a considerable amount of work to develop a Joint Core Strategy for the area covered by Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk councils, except for the Broads Authority area. This involved a major consultation exercise from November 2007 to February 2008, looking at ‘issues and options’. The document which formed the focus of this work, and the summary leaflet, looked at possible approaches to a wide range of topics including different ways of accommodating the level of new development necessary to meet the requirements of the East of England Plan. This included looking at alternative locations where large scale development might be located in the area close to Norwich. The GNDP intended to produce a ‘preferred option’ for public consultation last summer. However, changes to the plan-making process in June 2008 meant that the preferred option stage was removed. To comply with the new procedures the Partnership carried out a technical consultation with statutory agencies, service providers, organisations that deliver infrastructure, and other key stakeholders in August 2008. It asked them for guidance to develop the ‘content’ of the strategy and asked whether our current approach is one they could support. Technical consultees were asked to consider three options for the distribution of major growth in and around Norwich and on major sites. During autumn 2008 the information provided by technical consultees and further results from evidence studies, were presented to Councillors from the four GNDP councils who agreed to publish the emerging Joint Core Strategy for full public consultation.This consultation document now includes the favoured option for large scale housing growth in and around Norwich, and on major sites (see Appendix 0 on page 59).
    [Show full text]
  • Inspectors Report Into the Examination of the Joint Core Strategy for Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk
    Report to the Greater Norwich Development Partnership [Broadland District Council, Norwich City Council, South Norfolk Council and Norfolk County Council] by Roy Foster MA MRTPI and Mike Fox BA DipTP MRTPI Inspectors appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Date 22 February 2011 PLANNING AND COMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 2004, SECTION 20 REPORT ON THE EXAMINATION OF THE JOINT CORE STRATEGY FOR BROADLAND, NORWICH & SOUTH NORFOLK DEVELOPMENT PLAN DOCUMENT Document submitted for examination on 5 March 2010 Examination hearings held between 9 November and 9 December 2010 File Ref: PINS/G2625/429/3 ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS REPORT AA Appropriate Assessment AAP Area Action Plan AH Affordable Housing AMR Annual Monitoring Report AWS Anglian Water Services BCR Benefit to Cost Ratio BRT Bus Rapid Transit CABE Commission for Architecture & the Built Environment CBR Core Bus Route CIF Community Infrastructure Fund CIL Community Infrastructure Levy CSH Code for Sustainable Homes DCLG Department for Communities & Local Government DfT Department for Transport DJD Drivers Jonas Deloitte DPD Development Plan Document EEP East of England Plan EPIC East of England Production Innovation Centre EUV Established Use Value FC Focussed Changes GI Green Infrastructure GNDP Greater Norwich Development Partnership HD Habitats Directive HGV Heavy Goods Vehicles HMA Housing Market Assessment IC Inspectors’ Changes JCS Joint Core Strategy KSC Key Service Centre LDS Local Development Scheme LIPP Local Infrastructure Plan and Programme MSBC
    [Show full text]
  • Wretharn, Otherwise Little Wretham, East
    Wretharn, otherwise Little Wretham, East Wre- at his office in Cambridge ; and with the Clerk of tham, otherwise Great Wretham, Bridgeham, the Peace for the city and county of the city of otherwise Bridgham, Roudham, Larling, Snetter- Norwich, at his office in the city of Norwich ; and ton, Eccles, Wiiby, llargham, Attleborough, other- a copy of so much of the said plans, sections, and wise Attleburgli, Besthorpe, Wymondham, other- books of reference as relate to each of the parishes wise Wyndham, Hethersett, Kettartngham, Int- through which the proposed railway and branch wood, otherwise Intwoocl-cum-Keswick, Cringle- railway and works will pass, will be deposited, on ford, Keswick, Marketshall, otherwise Markshall, or before the thirty-first December next, with the Arniinghall, otherwise Arrneringhall, Trowse New- Parish Clerks of such parishes respectively, at their ton, Bexley, Thorpe, Caistor next Norsvich, Cais- respective residences. tor-cum-Markshall, otherwise Marketshall, Colney, Little Melton, Great Melton, Swardestone, Carl- Hayle Railway. ton Saint Peter, Carl ton Saint Mary, East Carlton, Mulbarton, otherwise Mulbarton-cum-Kenning- OTICE is hereby given, that application is ham, Bracon Ash, Hethel, Stanfield, Wicklewood, N intended to be made to Parliament in the "Wreningham, Ashwell Thorpe, Fundenhall, Old next session, for a Bill to alter, amend, and enlarge Buckenham, Shropham, Deopham, Larlingford, the powers and provisions of an Act, pa-ased in Great Eilinghara, Banham, Brettenham, East Har- the session of Parliament
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office
    Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office This list summarises the Norfolk Record Office’s (NRO’s) holdings of parish (Church of England) registers and of transcripts and other copies of them. Parish Registers The NRO holds registers of baptisms, marriages, burials and banns of marriage for most parishes in the Diocese of Norwich (including Suffolk parishes in and near Lowestoft in the deanery of Lothingland) and part of the Diocese of Ely in south-west Norfolk (parishes in the deanery of Fincham and Feltwell). Some Norfolk parish records remain in the churches, especially more recent registers, which may be still in use. In the extreme west of the county, records for parishes in the deanery of Wisbech Lynn Marshland are deposited in the Wisbech and Fenland Museum, whilst Welney parish records are at the Cambridgeshire Record Office. The covering dates of registers in the following list do not conceal any gaps of more than ten years; for the populous urban parishes (such as Great Yarmouth) smaller gaps are indicated. Whenever microfiche or microfilm copies are available they must be used in place of the original registers, some of which are unfit for production. A few parish registers have been digitally photographed and the images are available on computers in the NRO's searchroom. The digital images were produced as a result of partnership projects with other groups and organizations, so we are not able to supply copies of whole registers (either as hard copies or on CD or in any other digital format), although in most cases we have permission to provide printout copies of individual entries.
    [Show full text]
  • Land at Hethersett D E L I V E R Y S T a T E M E
    Land at Hethersett (HELAA Ref: Part of GNLP0177A, Part of GNLP0177B, GNLP1023A and GNLP1023B) Delivery Statement March 2020 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 02 01 INTRODUCTION 04 02 PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT 07 03 DELIVERY 09 04 PHYSICAL CONTEXT 11 05 TECHNICAL CAPACITY 12 06 SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE 16 07 LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT 18 08 ECOLOGY 20 09 HERITAGE 21 10 CONCEPT 22 11 CONCLUSION 24 APPENDICES 26 Pegasus Group Pegasus House Querns Business Centre Whitworth Road Cirencester GL7 1RT www.pegasusgroup.co.uk I T 01285 641717 Prepared on behalf of Pigeon Investment Management Ltd March 2020 Project code P20-0004 Checked by: INITIAL Copyright. The contents of this document must not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part without the written consent of Pegasus Planning Group Ltd. Crown copyright. All rights reserved, Licence number 100042093. Printed material produced by Pegasus Design Cirencester is printed on paper from sustainably managed sources and all parts are fully recyclable. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Delivery Statement (‘the Statement’) has been prepared by Pegasus for Pigeon Investment Management Ltd (‘Pigeon’) on behalf of the Hethersett Consortium (‘the Landowners’) and Pigeon Land 2 Ltd, who are promoting Land at Hethersett (the ‘Site’) for four complimentary high-quality mixed-use sustainable schemes. The Site comprises (i) Land off Hethersett Road that is being promoted for a high-quality landscape-led scheme including around 400 homes; (ii) Land off Little Melton Road that is being proposed as employment land; (iii) Land off Burnthouse Lane that is being promoted for a sports and education campus and around 50 new homes; and (iv) Land off Station Lane that is being promoted for a high-quality landscape-led care home and assisted living homes.
    [Show full text]