Lessons from the Archive: Sylvia Plath and the Politics of Memory

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lessons from the Archive: Sylvia Plath and the Politics of Memory Lessons from the Archive: Sylvia Plath and the Politics of Memory Anita Helle IN THE CHRISTINE JEFFS/JOHN BROWNLOW film .Sy/via, there is a scene in which newlyweds Ted Hughes and Sylvia Plath, in a small boat off the waters of "beautiful Nauset" on the eastern shores of Massachusetts, are tipped overboard. The camera goes underwater and the scene is lit from the back; for a brief second, as the bodies of the couple played by Gwyneth Paltrow and Daniel Craig thrash upward to the surface, their heads are above the water and their limbs appear transparent from below. It is a scene both beautiful and lethal, designed to give us a naturalized experience of the couple's mythic intensides (the White Coddess and her consort, mermaid and merman), while foreshadowing eventual doom. A few weeks after the film's release, another version of this empty yet hyper- bolic imagery appeared in the caption and image accompanying A.O. Scott's New York Times review of the same film. "A Poet's Death/A Death's Poetry," the capdon reads. In this picture of Plath, the primordial freakish- ness is toned down, but the luminous whiteness and the unambiguous messages are similar. Inside the photographic frame is an American sweet- heart kind of beauty, blonde, with a pink headband and a black bohemian- style cape. Plath/Paltrow is depicted as "discovering" Hughes through their shared passion for language, as she reads his poems from a Cambridge- Femmist Studtes 31, no. 3 (Fall 2005). © 2005 hy Anita Helle 631 632 Anita Helle affiliated magazine, St. Botolph's Review. And yet there are obvious ways in which the capdon cannot frame the photograph, and the woman in the photograph, apparently brimming with life, exceeds the given frame. A poet's death becomes a death's poetry. We find ourselves in the presence of a paradox that besets Plath's legacy: a continual crossing of corpse and cor- pus, the body of the writer and the body of the writing.' The image of Plath that opens and forecloses on an obsession is neither Plath's fault nor the fault of the parallel lives Plath biography has lived BOOKS DISCUSSED IN THIS ARTICLE Ariel—The Restored Edition: A Facsimile of Plath's Manuscript, Reinstating Her Original Selection and Arrangement. Foreword by Frieda Hughes. New York: HarperCollins, 2003. The Unabridged Journals of Sylvia Plath, 1950-1962. Edited by Karen V. Kukil. New York: Anchor Books, 2000. Her Husband: Hughes and Plath-A Marriage. By Diane Middlebrook. New York: Viking, 2003. Writing Back: Sylvia Plath and Cold War Politics. By Robin Peel. Rutherford, N.J.: Farleigh Dickinson University Press, 2002. The Other Ariel. By Lynda K. Bundtzen. Amherst: University of Massa- chusetts Press, 2001. The Other Sylvia Plath. By Tracy Brain. New York: Longman, 2001. Wintering: A Novel of Sylvia Plath. By Kate Moses. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2003. Pursuing Privacy in Cold War America. By Deborah Nelson. New York: Colum- bia University Press, 2002. with feminism in the twentieth century. If there is too easy a passage between the popular obsession with her death and an interest in keeping her writing alive, it is encouraged by certain features of that writing itself. Plath is known for having invented an intimate form of address that opens up a liminal space between language and subjectivity, putdng idendty at risk ("What a thrill- / My thumb instead of an onion," Plath begins her poem "Cut," locating the reader along the seam of being and nonbeing).^ Anita Helle 633 But it is the canons of literary history, not Plath, or popular representa- tions of Plath, or poetry itself, that install woman and death as the "most poetical topic" at the heart of Plath's celebrity.^ With Plath, it often seems that we are stuck with an "art of dying" that cannot fmish its repetitions. But perhaps what is needed is a paradigm shift and a few jolts of the real. Plath scholars have recently been finding their way around the impasse of woman as death by returning to the archive to consider an abundance of new material from fresh critical perspectives. Yet it appears that preoccu- pations with "evidence" are not solely a return to the "thing," the artifact as object, as much as a turn toward a consciousness of history and method, a critical awareness of the politics of knowledge that have materi- ally and discursively framed Plath's legacy. This process of critical reassess- ment is far from finished. In the work discussed here, a return to the archive entails consideration of an abundance of previously unpublished or newly archived material, a broader array of texts (drafts, collages, pho- tographs, visual art), and attempts to broaden and deepen the historical textures in which Plath's works are suspended and in relation to which they can be understood. Emerging from renewed interest in Plath studies is a greater emphasis on and appreciation of interdisciplinary and cross- genre ramifications, as well as bold reformulations of the public and pri- vate forces that have shaped Plath's legacy as a "confessional" writer. Finally, because Plath is a writer whose post-Romantic aesthetic has long been associated with the transfer of meaning in private and reflective spaces, I suggest that the extension of literary activities to the cyber world raises questions about how the Plath archive is being reshaped by uses of technology, especially through the dynamic interplay of public and pri- vate spaces and identities on the internet. THE EVOLUTION OF THE ARCHIVE A literary archive functions traditionally as a guarantee that a body of work belongs to the author's self, in propria persona (in her own body). But the body ofa writer's work is more than a deposit in a library or a collection; it is also shaped by the social transactions surrounding the publication, edit- ing, dissemination, and reception of an author's image and work. A decade ago, one influential set of speculations about tbe Plath archive could be 634 Anita Helle traced to Jacqueline Rose's The Haunting of Sylvia Plath. Departing from more empirical definitions of archival knowledge. Rose plucked from psychoan- alytic narrative the analogy of the disintegrated ego-a corps morcele (body-in- pieces)-to describe the status of the Plath archive as the "body of writing," reduced to oddments, scraps, and gossip.'' For Rose, the body-in-pieces was a figure for the morally objectionable or psychologically charged frag- ments that had been excluded from the body of Plath's published work, as well as an expression of symbolic violence. Rose was summarizing a state of affairs at a moment in the late 1980s when it appeared that nearly every- thing bad that could happen to a writer's work had happened to Plath's writing, much of it at the hands of those to whom it was entrusted for safekeeping, her husband and her mother, and she wrote an elegant protest against it. As the abundance of new material under discussion here would indicate, much has changed in Plath studies since Rose's path- breaking analysis. But the broader insight that Plath's legacy provides an absorbing instance of archive formation as a cultural process, occurring through a variety of means (historical, popular, biographical, fictional) and engaging a range of public interests, is still relevant. From this more situated perspective, the archive in modern history functions as a largely imaginary "wbole": a writer or executor makes deposits, entrusting tbe work to tbe safekeeping of family members, strangers, and literary profes- sionals; and archives are set up to prevent tbe decomposition of the body of writing (in compensation, perhaps, for tbe more literal decay of the body). The present moment is a remarkable one, in which scholars are responding to an abundance of new material and finding that Plath's legacy will never be the same. The "events" include publication of Hughes's Collected Poems, as useful as The Birthday Letters for what they reveal about the ongoing subterranean dialogues Hugbes carried on witb Plath throughout his career; the creation of a new archive at Emory University Woodruff Library (rumored to contain as much as two tons of material); tbe first exhibit of Plath's visual art in late 2002, coinciding with a seventi- eth birthday celebration; and the "unsealing" of materials previously off- limits to scholars (Hughes made several decisions about previously sealed materials before bis death).' It has been well-known tbat the typescript that Plath completed by the end of November or early December 1962 and Anita Heile 635 left in the black spring binder on her desk (in this the film 5y/vifl is accu- rate) differs significantly from the original published version, and its the- matic and symbolic center is not suicide. Now a wider pubUc also has access for the first time to a facsimile edition of Ariel (HarperCollins), as Plath had intended to publish it, differing in selection and arrangement from the book that made her name.' In the "big" picture that emerges from this new material, there is some news. First, Plath appears to have been a more prolific writer, by any stan- dard (versatility, volume, publication, discarded and abandoned lines, and unpublished manuscripts) than the narrower range of her "canonized" reputation for Ariel and The Bell far would allow. Second, her written and visual artwork engages a much broader range of cultural and historical reference than the many failed attempts at Plath biography would sug- gest. These new archival "discoveries" raise significant questions about whether and how new paradigms should be assimilated to or unsettle ear- lier, more sensationalist ones.
Recommended publications
  • Anna Journey, University of Southern California
    Plath Profiles 83 After Ariel: An Argument for Sylvia Plath's Phantom Third Poetry Collection Anna Journey, University of Southern California Phantoms abound in the Sylvia Plath canon. Plath burned her second novel, meant as a gift for her husband, the British poet Ted Hughes, on his birthday in August 1962. Doubletake, Plath's unfinished third novel, "disappeared somewhere around 1970"—long after Plath's suicide in February 1963—Hughes suggests in his introduction to Johnny Panic and the Bible of Dreams (1). According to Diane Middlebrook's biography of the Hughes/Plath marriage, Her Husband, Plath wrote her patroness, Olive Higgins Prouty, that "[Doubletake's] plot was 'semiautobiographical about a wife whose husband turns out to be a deserter and philanderer'" (198). Hughes's mistress, Assia Wevill, after reading the nascent novel, grew offended by the manner in which Plath caricatured the Wevills, as "a 'detestable and contemptible' couple called 'The Goos-Hoppers'"; Wevill openly hoped Hughes would destroy the unfinished novel (Middlebrook 220). More disturbingly, Wevill absconded with some of Plath's valuable manuscripts, which she sent to her sister, intending the stolen literary relics as a "nest egg" for Shura (the daughter Wevill had with Hughes; the daughter she later murdered during her own suicide via a gas oven) (Middlebrook 232). One is left wondering, "What happened to Doubletake?" Even The Unabridged Journals of Sylvia Plath (2000), edited by Karen Kukil, remain incomplete, as a total of two bound journals that Plath used during the last three years of her life are missing from the oeuvre. Hughes, in his foreword to Frances McCullough's 1982 abridged edition of Plath's journals, claims that one of the journals simply "disappeared," much like the draft of Doubletake, while he deliberately destroyed his wife's other "maroon-backed ledger," in order to spare their children from reading about the darkness of their mother's final days (xiv).
    [Show full text]
  • I Have a Self to Recover: Sylvia Plath and the Literary Success of the Failed Suicide Clare Emily Clifford, Birmingham-Southern College
    Plath Profiles 285 I Have a Self to Recover: Sylvia Plath and the Literary Success of the Failed Suicide Clare Emily Clifford, Birmingham-Southern College How shall I age into that state of mind? I am the ghost of an infamous suicide, My own blue razor rusting in my throat. Sylvia Plath, "Electra on Azalea Path" For most people, Sylvia Plath's work represents the epitome of suicidal poetry. The corpus of her poetic oeuvre forever captures the exhumation and resurrection of the material corpses it recomposes through figuration—fragments of bone from the colossal father, the "rubble of skull plates" in the cadaver room, Lady Lazarus' perpetual suicide strip-tease (Collected Poems 114). Plath's poetry is virtually a playground of decomposition; her speakers inhabit a "cramped necropolis," piecing together a ferocious love gathered among the graves (117). By collecting the force of this energy, Plath's work evidences a honed, disciplined voice of controlled extremity. This leads many critics, and often my students, to read into Plath's poetic intensity that she is an angry poet—considering her characters and poetic speakers' fierce energy as evidence of Plath's own anger. But as Plath's speakers wrestle with their anger on the page, they reveal the pain they feel and peace they fiercely and desperately wish for. This anger derives from their frustrated desire to find a lasting peace by recovering language from the constriction of suicidal thinking. Her speakers' rage represents the voice of anger turned against the self. Scavenging the ruins of the suicide's inner landscape—their inscape—Plath's speakers piece themselves together, death after self-inflicted death, becoming virtual experts at trying to recover from failed suicides.1 1 The field of Suicidology uses the term "completed suicide" to distinguish "individuals who have died by their own hand; have been sent to a morgue, funeral home, burial plot, or crematory; and are beyond any therapy" (Maris 15).
    [Show full text]
  • Fine Books and Manuscripts Books Fine
    Wednesday 21 March 2018 21 March Wednesday FINE BOOKS AND MANUSCRIPTS FINE BOOKS AND MANUSCRIPTS | Knightsbridge, London | Wednesday 21 March 2018 24633 FINE BOOKS AND MANUSCRIPTS Wednesday 21 March 2018 at 10am Knightsbridge, London BONHAMS ENQUIRIES Please see page 2 for bidder Montpelier Street Matthew Haley information including after-sale Knightsbridge Simon Roberts collection and shipment. London SW7 1HH Luke Batterham www.bonhams.com Sarah Lindberg Please see back of catalogue +44 (0) 20 7393 3828 for important notice to bidders VIEWING +44 (0) 20 7393 3831 Sunday 18 March ILLUSTRATIONS 11am - 3pm Shipping and Collections Front cover: Lot 83 Monday 19 March Leor Cohen Back cover: Lot 245 9am - 4.30pm +44 (0) 20 7393 3841 Tuesday 20 March +44 (0) 20 7393 3879 Fax 9am - 4.30pm [email protected] Please note that Bonhams will be closed Friday 30 March BIDS PRESS ENQUIRIES 2018 – Monday 2 April 2018 +44 (0) 20 7447 7447 [email protected] for the Easter Holiday. +44 (0) 20 7447 7401 fax [email protected] CUSTOMER SERVICES To bid via the internet Monday to Friday please visit www.bonhams.com 8.30am – 6pm +44 (0) 20 7447 7447 New bidders must also provide proof of identity when submitting LIVE ONLINE BIDDING IS bids. Failure to do this may result AVAILABLE FOR THIS SALE in your bids not being processed. Please email [email protected] with “Live bidding” in the subject Please note that bids should be line up to 48 hours before the submitted no later than 4pm on auction to register for this service.
    [Show full text]
  • Sylvia and the Absence of Life Before Ted
    http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-7917.2018v23n1p133 SYLVIA AND THE ABSENCE OF LIFE BEFORE TED. Mariana Chaves Petersen* Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio Grande do Sul Abstract: As Bronwyn Polaschek mentions in The Postfeminist Biopic, the film Sylvia (Christine Jeffs, 2003) is based on biographies of Sylvia Plath that focus on her relationship with husband Ted Hughes – such as Janet Malcolm’s The Silent Woman. In this paper, grounded in the works of Linda Hutcheon, Mary E. Hawkesworth, and Tracy Brain, I argue that this biography works as a palimpsest of Sylvia and that the film constructs Plath as the Ariel persona, neglecting her “Juvenilia” – her early poetry, as it has been defined by Hughes. Sylvia actually leaves Plath’s early life – before she met Hughes – aside and it thus ends up portraying her more as a wife than as a writer. Finally, by bringing information on Plath’s life before she met Hughes from a more recent biography (by Andrew Wilson), I analyze how a different image of Plath might have been created if this part of her life were not missing in the film. Keywords: Sylvia. Sylvia Plath. Adaptation studies. Biopic. Feminist criticism. She wanted to be everything, I think. She was always searching for the self that she was going to be. — Elinor Friedman Klein, qtd. in Andrew Wilson, Mad Girl Love’s Song How can you be so many women to so many people, oh you strange girl? — Sylvia Plath, from her journals Introduction: a chosen branch Several were the attempts to fictionalize Sylvia Plath by making her a character in novels, poems, films, and biographies.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd Thesis Tunstall Corrected 11:12:15
    Vision and Visual Art in Sylvia Plath’s Ariel and Last Poems Submitted by Lucy Suzannah Tunstall to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English June 2015 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: ………………………………………………………….. 1 ABSTRACT This dissertation is concerned with Sylvia Plath’s late works. Engaging with critical discussion of what constitutes the corpus of Ariel I show that an appreciation of the editorial history reveals the beginnings of a third book (the last poems) and opens up those difficult and important texts to fresh enquiry. Recent work in Plath studies has focused on visual art. Kathleen Connors and Sally Bayley’s Eye Rhymes examines Plath’s own artwork in an ‘attempt to answer the question, How did Plath arrive at Ariel?’ (1). I contribute to that discussion, but also ask the questions, How did Plath leave Ariel behind and arrive at the even more remarkable last poems, and how did visual art contribute to those journeys? I argue that Ariel’s characteristically lucid style is informed by the dismantling of depth perspective in Post-impressionist painting, and by the colour theory and pedagogy of the Bauhaus teachers. My work is underpinned by an appreciation of Plath’s unique cultural moment in mid-century East Coast America.
    [Show full text]
  • Owen Johnson TED HUGHES
    Owen Johnson TED HUGHES: SPEAKING FOR THE EARTH Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, 1991. This thesis explores the attempt in Ted Hughes' poems to reconcile 'fallen' human consciousness and unreflecting, instinctive involvement in the Earth: consciousness must learn to understand, and to speak for, the Earth it is alienated from. Part One suggests the relevance of the thinking in Hughes' poetry and prose to contemporary ecological theories; it also tries to answer liberal, Marxist, feminist and other critiques of Hughes' work and to justify his ideas on free will, reason, violence, schizophrenia, ritual, shamanism and other subjects. The thesis, secondly, argues for poems' aesthetic importance: Part Two explores a large number of individual poems, offering paraphrases for their more philosophically complex arguments and showing how themes such as the flux of existence (symbolized by wheels and rivers) run through Hughes' oeuvre. Wodwo, Crow, Cave Birds, the Gaudete epilogue, Moortown and River are considered as unified wholes, whose end, of speaking for the Earth, is occasionally and briefly attained. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. 18 AUG 1992 CONTENTS Page Introduction: Literary Criticism and Hughes' Poetry 1 PART ONE Chapter 1: The Earth la: Hughes and Human Ecology 10 lb: Poetry and Ecology 22 2a: David Holbrook on Hughes 26 2b: Hughes' 'Natural Scientism' 27 2c: Contradictory Influences of Blake and Graves 32 2d: Zen, Memory, Subjectivity 35 3a: Graham Bradshaw on Hughes 38 3b: Reason 39 3c: Myth and Ritual 41 3d: Shamanism 44 4a: Dennis Walder on Hughes 46 4b: Hughes and Feminism 48 5a: Martin Dodsworth on Hughes.
    [Show full text]
  • FZ-256501-17 Heather Clark NEH Public Scholar Application Narrative Section January 29, 2017
    FZ-256501-17 Heather Clark NEH Public Scholar Application Narrative Section January 29, 2017 SIGNIFICANCE AND CONTRIBUTION Why do we need another biography of Sylvia Plath? Although several have been published since her death in 1963, a definitive, critical biography of America’s best-known, 20th- century woman poet still does not exist. Because biographies of Plath tend to be inaccurate and sensationalist, there is a need for an in-depth, meticulously researched biography that resists caricature and helps restore Plath to the prominent place she deserves in American letters. Sylvia Plath: The Light of the Mind will recover Plath the writer. The celebrated biographer Hermione Lee has noted, “Women writers whose lives involved abuse, mental-illness, self-harm, suicide, have often been treated, biographically, as victims or psychological case-histories first and as professional writers second.”1 This is especially true in Plath’s case. Like Marilyn Monroe, who died six months before her, Plath is an enigmatic, paradoxical symbol of female power and helplessness, an expert performer whose life was subsumed by her afterlife. She has been mythologized in movies, television, and even biographies as a high priestess of poetry, obsessed with death. These distortions gained momentum in the 1960s when Plath’s seminal collection Ariel was published. Most reviewers didn’t know what to make of the burning, pulsating metaphors in poems like “Lady Lazarus,” or the chilly imagery of “Edge,” so they resorted to cliché. Time called the book a “jet of flame from a literary dragon,” while the Washington Post dubbed Plath a “snake lady of misery.”2 The poet Robert Lowell characterized Plath as a Medea figure hurtling toward her own destruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Ted Hughes: a Bibliographical Supplement 1996-2013
    1 Ted Hughes: A Bibliographical Supplement 1996-2013 A Supplement to Ted Hughes: A Bibliography1946-1995, by Keith Sagar and Stephen Tabor, Mansell, 1998. Keith Sagar There are no doubt many errors and omissions in this supplement. However, its publication in electronic form means that these can easily be rectified at frequent intervals. I hope that readers who notice any errors, omissions or new material will notify me - [email protected] , so that the supplement can be continuously updated. It has proved impractical to retain the continuous numbering of sections D and J. Keith Sagar 2013. [A hint to computer beginners. An essential aspect of any bibliography is a full index. The computer, however, has a built-in index for all documents. Click Edit at the top of the page. In the drop-down menu click Find. Type in the name, title, word or phrase you are looking for. By pressing Next, this will take you to every occurrence of it in the supplement.] 2 Contents Acknowledgements 3 A. Books, pamphlets and broadsides by Ted Hughes 4 B. Books, pamphlets and broadsides edited by or with 16 contributions by Ted Hughes C. Contributions to periodicals. 23 D. Translations 28 E. Interviews and comment 38 F. Recordings 40 G. Broadcasts 43 H. Miscellaneous (including dust-wrapper, record sleeve and programme notes, and ephemera) 44 I. Settings 45 J. Books and articles about Ted Hughes 46 Books 46 Parts of books 56 Articles in periodicals 61 Theses 71 Online publications 72 Obituaries 80 K. Manuscipts 81 L. Productions of Plays by Ted Hughes 83 3 Acknowledgements I am greatly indebted to the following for their unstinting help: Isabel Fernandes, Terry Gifford, Chen Hong, Olwyn Hughes, Claas Kazzer, Lorraine Kerslake, Tetsuji Kohno, Joanny Moulin, Ann Skea, Marina Tsvetkova, Mark Wormald.
    [Show full text]
  • Reviews Contents
    TEXT Vol 19 No 1 (April 2015) Reviews contents • Craig Batty (ed), Screenwriters and Screenwriting: Putting practice into context review by Felicity Packard page 2 • Patrick West and Om Prakash Dwivedi (eds), The World to Come review by Nike Sulway page 5 • Moya Costello, Harriet Chandler: A novella review by Julienne van Loon page 8 • Keith St Clair Butler, The Secret Vindaloo review by Dominique Hecq page 12 • Reina Whaitiri, Robert Sullivan (eds), Puna Wai Kōrero: An Anthology of Māori Poetry in English review by Jörg-Dieter Riemenschneider page 15 • Geoff Goodfellow, Opening the Windows to Catch the Sea Breeze: Selected poems 1983-2011 review by SK Kelen page 21 • Dominique Hecq, Stretchmarks of Sun review by Vivienne Plumb page 24 • Susan Bradley Smith, Beds for All Who Come review by Susie Utting page 27 • Anne Elvey, Kin review by Jessica L. Wilkinson page 30 • Bel Schenk, Every Time You Close Your Eyes review by Linda Weste page 34 • Grant Caldwell, Love & Derangement review by Jeremy Fisher page 38 • Lisa Jacobson, South in the World review by Amy Brown page 41 • Michelle Leber, The Yellow Emperor: A Mythography in Verse review by Ruby Todd page 44 Review of Craig Batty (ed), Screenwriters and Screenwriting TEXT Vol 19 No 1 TEXT review Illuminating the screenplay review by Felicity Packard Screenwriters and Screenwriting: putting practice into context Craig Batty (ed) Palgrave Macmillan, Houndsmill Basingstoke 2014 ISBN 9781137338921 Hb 320pp GBP60.00, AUD207.75 In his introduction to Screenwriters and Screenwriting: putting practice into context, editor Craig Batty expresses his frustration at the snobbery with which academia has tended view the many ‘how to’ guides to screenwriting: …for a field whose central concern is practice – the screenwriter writes and the screenplay is written for production – I find it somewhat disappointing that many academics quickly write off anything intended to aid writing practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Sylvia—Reconstructing Sylvia Plath's Ariel
    Academic Forum 26 2008-09 Restoring Sylvia—Reconstructing Sylvia Plath’s Ariel Carly Cate MLA Graduate Student Mentor: Dr. Wayne McGinnis, Ph.D. Professor of English Abstract In Sylvia Plath’s, Ariel , first released in the United Kingdom in 1965 and in the United States in 1966, her husband, Ted Hughes, meticulously altered the released work from Plath’s original manuscript. Hughes removed and replaced several poems in the US and the UK versions. Hughes is also responsible for changing punctuation, diction, and even the original title of the work. These changes and manipulations are superbly demonstrated in Ariel: The Restored Edition , released in 2004. In this edition, Frieda Hughes, daughter to Sylvia Plath and Ted Hughes, provides a very insightful, though possibly skewed, forward. Frieda Hughes understandably stands by her father’s decision in the editing of Plath’s manuscript. She presents Ted Hughes as a victim of circumstance, criticized for his molestation of Plath’s original work. Does replacing more personal and confessional poems with less offensive, more “suitable” works make the first editions of Ariel better than his wife’s true original collection? Why remove and change aspects of Plath’s original manuscript if not for Mr. Hughes’ own personal gain or protection? In Sylvia Plath’s, Ariel , first released in the United Kingdom in 1965 and in the United States in 1966, her husband, Ted Hughes, meticulously altered the released work from Plath’s original manuscript. Hughes removed and replaced several poems in the US and the UK versions. The barred poems included, “The Rabbit Catcher,” “Thalidomide,” “Barren Woman,” “A secret,” “The Jailor,” “The Detective,” “Magi,” “The Other,” “Stopped Dead,” “The Courage of Shutting Up,” “Purdah,” and “Amnesiac.” Hughes is also responsible for changing punctuation, diction, and even the original title of the work.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Writing the Plath Myth: Sylvia Plath and the Cult of Celebrity in Print Publication Elizabeth Anne Roodhouse Woodbridge
    Re-Writing the Plath Myth: Sylvia Plath and the Cult of Celebrity in Print Publication Elizabeth Anne Roodhouse Woodbridge, V A BA, University of Virginia, 2005 A Thesis presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of English University of Virginia May, 2006 Degree \ \ \ \ Towards what [A. Alvarez] calls ‘the Plath industry throbbing with busy-ness in the Universities,’ and towards that ‘vast potential audience,’ I feel no obligations whatsoever. The scholars want the anatomy of the birth of the poetry; and the vast potential audience wants her blood, hair, touch, smell and a front seat in the kitchen where she died. The scholars may well inherit what they want, some day, and there are journalists supplying the other audience right now. But neither audience makes me feel she owes them anything. - Ted Hughes, from The Observer, November 21, 1971 i. Introduction: Rewriting the Plath Myth When does an author become an icon? When does the cult of celebrity transform into myth? If we had ever been in doubt of Sylvia Plath’s rising currency as a pop culture icon, the 2003 film Sylvia starring Gwyneth Paltrow as the famed “poet/suicide” Sylvia Plath seals the deal. Uniting two already-famous faces and merging them into one, the film Sylvia (and the glut of promotional propaganda for the film still circulating in its wake) calls explicit attention to these relationships between author and celebrity, image and icon. “Does Paltrow look like Plath?” we might ask, or “How well does she play her?” Importantly, we are able to ask these questions of Sylvia because its subject has attained the status of a ubiquitous and immediately recognizable figure in American culture.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Child's Cry/ Melts in the Wall” : Frieda Hughes and a Contemporary Reading of Sylvia Plath
    269 “The child’s cry/ Melts in the wall” 1: Frieda Hughes and a Contemporary Reading of Sylvia Plath Kara Kilfoil For decades now, critics and academics have condemned the ways in which Ted Hughes censored and altered the work of his late wife, Sylvia Plath. He has been roundly attacked for his destruction of her 1962 journal and for his reordering of the Ariel poems prior to their 1965/66 publication. Despite Hughes’s claims that he was simply “omit[ing] . more personally aggressive poems” (qtd. in Plath CP 15), or that the journal was destroyed because he “regarded forgetfulness as an essential part of survival” and he “did not want her children to have to read it” (qtd. in Plath J xiii), critics rightly remain outraged at his disruption of Plath’s voice and a myriad of books and articles have concerned themselves with his censorship of her writings. It is interesting, then, that Frieda Hughes, daughter of Plath and Ted Hughes, occupies a seemingly sacrosanct space when her mother is concerned. Interviewing Frieda Hughes in June 2001, Mick Brown claims: “she has carefully avoided becoming embroiled in the fierce discourse about her parents’ marriage – the elevation of her mother to feminist martyr, the demonisation of her father as callous, insensitive uber-male . she has never contributed to any books about her parents, nor does she intend to”(2001). He quotes Hughes: “There’s nothing I could say. In my mother’s case, everybody’s made it up already and they’re sticking to their stories. And in my father’s case, no” (2001).
    [Show full text]