Case Study 2: SABRE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Case Study 2: SABRE Case Study SABRE In a dogsled race, unless you are the lead dog, the view never changes! (Bob Crandal Chairman and President of AMR) A chance meeting between two Mr Smiths on an American Airlines flight from Los Angeles to New York in 1953 resulted in the development of an innovative computer system that was to change the future of travel distribution. The outcome of the conversation between C.R. Smith, President of American Airlines and R. Blair Smith, a senior sales rep for IBM, was a project called semi-automated business environment research (SABER), which was the first step in the development of today‘s mighty GDS. Once SABER was operational, the two companies went their separate ways. IBM used their expertise to create PARS, which formed the base technology for the reservations systems of many of American‘s competitors, while SABER was further developed by American and was re-christened SABRE to distinguish it from the original system. Prior to the introduction of automation, airline reservations were processed and recorded manually. A system of ticks recorded on coloured index cards was used to control availability on individual flights. These cards were arranged on a ‘lazy Susan‘, and reservation clerks could see the number of seats available an a particular flight by locating its card and counting the ticks. Passenger details were recorded separately as hand-written records, and the entire process was complicated, labour-intensive and unwieldy. For example, a round trip booking from New York City to Buffalo required 12 different people to perform more than a dozen separate steps over a 3 hour period - longer than the flight itself took! However, the introduction of computerized systems helped to change all of this and greatly improve efficiency and effectiveness. Throughout its history, SABRE went through several separate stages of development. SABRE originally took shape in response to American‘s inability to monitor its inventory of available seats manually and to attach passenger names to booked seats. Thus SABRE began as a relatively simple inventory management tool, although by the standards of the early 1960s, it was an innovative technological achievement. In 1963, the first year it was fully operational, it daily processed data relating to 85,000 phone calls, 40,000 confirmed reservations and 20,000 ticket sales. Over the years, the system‘s reach and functionality was greatly expanded. Its technology provided the base for generating flight plans for American‘s aircraft, tracking spare parts and scheduling crews, as it became much more than an inventory control system. But, at the end of the day, this phase of SABRE was still purely internally focused, helping American Airlines to improve the efficiency of its operations. The scope of the system changed significantly with the installation of the first SABRE terminal with direct reservations capability in a travel agency in May 1976. Prior to this, American, along with the other major carriers, had been involved in an industry- wide consortium which was trying to develop a shared CRS for use by travel agents. While the proposed system was deemed economically practical, one of American‘s main competitors, United Airlines, withdrew from the project and announced its intention to place terminals connected to its own reservation system into agencies. Since this would have schedule displays and flight connections biased in favour of United, it represented a competitive threat to the other airlines if it became accepted by the lucrative travel agent sector. As a result, American followed United‘s example and gave travel agents direct access to their system. Over the decade that followed, SABRE increased the attractiveness of their system for travel agents by adding new services such as hotel, car and rail reservations, incorporating powerful new features to help agents offer better service, and created a comprehensive training and support infrastructure. In terms of airline flights, preference was given to American‘s services, thus leading to increased booking volumes. SABRE had become a competitive tool, helping to promote American‘s flights and services over those of its competitors. The final stage of development is still in progress today. SABRE has changed from being a single-access system, solely distributing the flights of its parent airline, to being an unbiased multi-access system offering a broad range of travel and travel-related products. American‘s flights are not treated any differently to those of the other 700 airlines whose schedules and fares are in the System. American Airlines pays SABRE the same booking fees as other airlines, and effectively any benefit which accrues from owning the system has been eliminated. SABRE has become an electronic travel supermarket, acting as a middleman between suppliers of travel services on the one hand and travel retailers, and even the end consumer, on the other. While, traditionally, its strength lay in servicing the business travel market, it has expanded its horizons to the leisure sector in a bid to capture more market share. The company has invested tens of millions of dollars in developing and enhancing its leisure programs, giving users better access to tour operators, cruise lines, ferries, ground transport and railroads, as well as more and more car hire and hotel properties that market primarily to the leisure traveller. Ancillary travel services such as theatre tickets, travel insurance and destination information have also been added, making SABRE more attractive as an all- round tool for travel reservations. SABRE Today Although originally developed by American Airlines, AMR, the parent company of American, separated the SABRE Group from American Airlines, setting it up as a separate subsidiary, on an equal footing with the airline. In 1996, AMR converted SABRE into a public company by offering an IP0 (initial public offering) of SABRE Group stock on the New York Stock Exchange. Approximately 18% of the company was sold to public investors. Overall, SABRE is highly profitable, with earnings of $200 million on sales of $1.8 billion in 1997. SABRE itself is organized into three operating divisions: SABRE Computer Services is the data-processing arm of AMR that developed and now maintains SABRE and its related communications networks; SABRE Development Services is responsible for the development of new products and services to better serve the company‘s customers; while SABRE Travel Information Network is the marketing arm of the company, which is responsible for selling the System to both travel agents and travel suppliers. The SABRE core system runs on a very large mainframe located in Tulsa, Oklahoma. This underground facility is designed to withstand virtually anything — earthquakes, storms, floods, even terrorist attack - to ensure that SABRE 5 kept up and running to provide continuous service to its customers. It processes over 4500 messages and over 65,000 data accesses per second and has data storage capacity in excess of 1800 Gigabytes. It has computer terminals in over 33,000 agencies in 184 countries on six continents, and, in addition to information and reservation services for 750 airlines, it provides services to over 31,000 hotel properties, representing approximately 200 hotel chains, plus rate, booking and availability for over 50 cars hire firms. At peak periods, the mainframe system processes approximately 150 million travel requests per day. The group also operates an X.25 network in 76 countries with over 20,000 parts, and this, together with its connections to the numerous travel supplier CRSs, make SABRE the largest private computer system in the world. SABRE can be accessed in a number of ways by different types of users: Travel agents are SABRE‘s core customers and access the system using Professional SABRE. This runs on a wide variety of hardware (from dumb terminals to Windows personal computers (PCs) to minicomputers) and allows agents to check real- time availability and flight information, to reserve travel products and to print tickets. Although most agencies are directly connected to the SABRE system over a computer network, a dial-up version is also available for smaller agencies that cannot justify the cost of a permanent connection. Corporate travel departments can use Commercial SABRE to access a limited subset of the system‘s functions. The software is run on a PC and accesses the SABRE core system over CompuServe. Users can check availability and select a seat on a flight that they would like to book. This booking is then routed to their nominated travel agent, who checks the booking, and looks after ticketing and payment issues. In same cases, it is even possible for the ticket to be printed in the corporate customer‘s own offices using a satellite printed under the control of the travel agency. SABRE also helps companies to better manage their corporate travel budget using its ‘Business Travel Solutions product. This offers reservations capability, as well as expense report processing and post-travel analysis to help a company see, at an individual or consolidated level, just who is travelling, how much is being spent and gauge adherence to corporate travel policies. Consumers can use services such as EasySABRE on CompuServe or AOL to access the SABRE system. This uses a simple ‘fill in the blanks‘ screen to specify the travel requirements, and the reservation is then transferred to a local travel agency for ticketing and follow—up action. Although EasySABRE‘s capabilities have now been expanded from solely flights to the full range of travel products available an the full system, its user interface is still quite basic and it has been, to a large extent, replaced by Travelocity. Innovation at SABRE From the very beginning, SABRE has been at the forefront of the race to apply technology to travel distribution. As well as being the first computerized airline reservation system, they were among the first to install terminals in travel agencies (experimentally in 1967, fully in 1976) and the first to introduce a frequent flyer programme.
Recommended publications
  • Sabre Corporation (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    ' UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D. C. 20549 FORM 10-K ~ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 or • TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Sabre Corporation (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 001-36422 20-8647322 (State or other jurisdiction (Commission File Number) (I.R.S. Employer of Incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 3150 Sabre Drive Southlake, TX 76092 (Address, including zip code, ofprinc ipal executive offices) (682) 605-1000 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.01 par value The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (Title of class) (Name of exchange on which registered ) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrantis a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes l!I No • Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act Yes • No l!I Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has fi led all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Control System Version 2: General Information Manual Figures
    Airline Control System Version 2 IBM General Information Manual Release 4.1 GH19-6738-13 Airline Control System Version 2 IBM General Information Manual Release 4.1 GH19-6738-13 Note Before using this information and the product it supports, be sure to read the general information under “Notices” on page ix. This edition applies to Release 4, Modification Level 1, of Airline Control System Version 2, Program Number 5695-068, and to all subsequent releases and modifications until otherwise indicated in new editions. Order publications through your IBM representative or the IBM branch office serving your locality. Publications are not stocked at the address given below. A form for readers’ comments appears at the back of this publication. If the form has been removed, address your comments to: ALCS Development 2455 South Road P923 Poughkeepsie NY 12601-5400 USA When you send information to IBM, you grant IBM a nonexclusive right to use or distribute the information in any way it believes appropriate without incurring any obligation to you. © Copyright IBM Corporation 2003, 2019. US Government Users Restricted Rights – Use, duplication or disclosure restricted by GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corp. Contents Figures .................................... v Tables .................................... vii Notices .................................... ix Trademarks ................................... ix About this book ................................ xi Who should read this book .............................. xi Related publications ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Forging the Future of Hospitality: Blockchain for Trust Now And
    Expert Insights Forging the future of hospitality Blockchain for trust now—and in a post-pandemic world In collaboration with: Experts on this topic Kurt Wedgwood Kurt leads IBM’s Blockchain North America practice for the Retail, Consumer Product and Travel industries. He helps IBM North America Blockchain clients build deeper trust in information and process Leader for Retail, Consumer execution. He is an adjunct professor, chair emeritus of Products, Travel & Transport Seattle University’s Innovation and Entrepreneurship [email protected] Board, and is working with the World Business Council for linkedin.com/in/wedgwood Sustainable Development. Kurt lives in Seattle, WA and received his MBA from the University of Chicago. Rob Grimes Robert (“Rob”) Grimes is the Founder & CEO of the IFBTA (International Food & Beverage Technology Association), International Food and Beverage a non-profit professional trade association promoting and Technology Association advancing technology and innovation for the global food Founder & CEO and beverage industries. Previously, Rob also founded [email protected] FSTEC (Foodservice Technology Conference and linkedin.com/in/rogrimes Showcase) and ConStrata Consulting & Services, which www.ifbta.org provides IT services for the global hospitality, foodservice and retail industries. Greg Land Greg serves as Global Industry Leader with global responsibility for Aviation, Hospitality, and Travel Related IBM Distinguished Industry Leader, Services industry segment. Prior to joining IBM, held Travel & Transportation leadership roles with American Airlines, Sabre, Wyndham [email protected] Hotel Group and Radius Global Travel Management, linkedin.com/in/gregland spanning a 23-year career across the travel industry. Greg holds bachelor’s degrees in Computer Science and Accounting, and an MBA from Oklahoma State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile to Mainframe Devops for Dummies®, IBM Limited Edition Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc
    These materials are © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited. Mobile to Mainframe DevOps IBM Limited Edition By Rosalind Radcliffe These materials are © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited. Mobile to Mainframe DevOps For Dummies®, IBM Limited Edition Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River St. Hoboken, NJ 07030‐5774 www.wiley.com Copyright © 2015 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except as permitted under Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without the prior written permission of the Publisher. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748‐6011, fax (201) 748‐6008, or online at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions. Trademarks: Wiley, For Dummies, the Dummies Man logo, The Dummies Way, Dummies.com, Making Everything Easier, and related trade dress are trademarks or registered trademarks of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and/or its affiliates in the United States and other countries, and may not be used without written permission. IBM and the IBM logo are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book. LIMIT OF LIABILITY/DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY: THE PUBLISHER AND THE AUTHOR MAKE NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES WITH RESPECT TO THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE CONTENTS OF THIS WORK AND SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION WARRANTIES OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline of Computer History
    Timeline of Computer History By Year By Category Search AI & Robotics (55) Computers (145)(145) Graphics & Games (48) Memory & Storage (61) Networking & The Popular Culture (50) Software & Languages (60) Bell Laboratories scientist 1937 George Stibitz uses relays for a Hewlett-Packard is founded demonstration adder 1939 Hewlett and Packard in their garage workshop “Model K” Adder David Packard and Bill Hewlett found their company in a Alto, California garage. Their first product, the HP 200A A Called the “Model K” Adder because he built it on his Oscillator, rapidly became a popular piece of test equipm “Kitchen” table, this simple demonstration circuit provides for engineers. Walt Disney Pictures ordered eight of the 2 proof of concept for applying Boolean logic to the design of model to test recording equipment and speaker systems computers, resulting in construction of the relay-based Model the 12 specially equipped theatres that showed the movie I Complex Calculator in 1939. That same year in Germany, “Fantasia” in 1940. engineer Konrad Zuse built his Z2 computer, also using telephone company relays. The Complex Number Calculat 1940 Konrad Zuse finishes the Z3 (CNC) is completed Computer 1941 The Zuse Z3 Computer The Z3, an early computer built by German engineer Konrad Zuse working in complete isolation from developments elsewhere, uses 2,300 relays, performs floating point binary arithmetic, and has a 22-bit word length. The Z3 was used for aerodynamic calculations but was destroyed in a bombing raid on Berlin in late 1943. Zuse later supervised a reconstruction of the Z3 in the 1960s, which is currently on Operator at Complex Number Calculator (CNC) display at the Deutsches Museum in Munich.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the District of Delaware
    Case 1:19-cv-01548-LPS Document 277 Filed 04/08/20 Page 1 of 97 PageID #: 6849 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE UNJTED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. C.A. No. 19-1548-LPS SABRE CORP., REDACTED PUBLIC SABRE GLBL INC., VERSION FARELOGIXINC., and (RELEASED APRIL 8, SANDLER CAPITAL PARTNERS V, L.P., 2020) Defendants. David C. Weiss, Laura D. Hatcher, and Shamoor Anis, UNITEDSTATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Wilmington, DE Julie S. Elmer, Scott A. Westrich, Sarah P. McDonough, Robert A. Lepore, Aaron Comenetz, Brian E. Hanna, Craig W. Conrath,Dylan M. Carson, Rachel A. Flipse, Michael T. Nash, Jeremy P. Evans, Vittorio Cottafavi,Seth J. Wiener, John A. Holler, Grant A. Bermann, and Katherine A. Celeste, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, DC Attorneys forPlaintiff United States of America Joseph 0. Larkin and Veronica A. Bartholomew, SKADDEN, ARPS,SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP, Wilmington, DE Tara L. Reinhart and Steven C. Sunshine, SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP, Washington, DC Matthew M. Martino, Michael H. Menitove, and Evan R. Kreiner, SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP, New York, NY Attorneys forDefendants Sabre Corporation and Sabre GLBL Inc. Case 1:19-cv-01548-LPS Document 277 Filed 04/08/20 Page 2 of 97 PageID #: 6850 Daniel A. Mason, PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Wilmington, DE Kenneth A. Gallo, Jonathan S. Kanter, Joseph J. Bia!, and Daniel J. Howley, PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION April 7, 2020 Wilmington, Delaware Case 1:19-cv-01548-LPS Document 277 Filed 04/08/20 Page 3 of 97 PageID #: 6851 INTRODUCTION The United States Department of Justice ("DOJ" or "government") filed this expedited antitrust action seeking to permanently enjoin the proposed acquisition by Defendants Sabre Corporation and Sabre GLBL Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Rise of the Intelligent Machines in Healthcare March 2, 2016
    Rise of the Intelligent Machines in Healthcare March 2, 2016 Kenneth A. Kleinberg, FHIMSS Managing Director, Research & Insights The Advisory Board Company Conflict of Interest Kenneth A. Kleinberg, MA Has no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report. Agenda • Roundtable Learning Objectives • Overview of Intelligent Computing • Use in Other Industries • Uses in Health Care • Challenges and Futures • Roundtable Questions/Discussion • Summary/Wrap-Up Learning Objectives • Identify what advances in intelligent computing are having the greatest effect on other industries such as transportation, retail, and financial services, and how these advances could be applied to healthcare • Compare the types of technological approaches used in intelligent computing, such as inferencing, constraint-based reasoning, neural networks, and machine learning, and the types of problems they can address in healthcare • Identify examples of the application of intelligent computing in healthcare and the Internet of Things (IoT) that are already deployed or are in development and the benefits they provide, such as robotic assistants, smart pumps, speech interfaces, scheduling systems, and remote diagnosis • Recognize the workflow, workforce, and cultural changes that will need to occur in a world of intelligent machines, such as the morphing or elimination of job roles, comparisons of human to computer performance, and the reliance, risks and benefits of use of intelligent systems • Discuss the IT implications and how healthcare industry professionals can
    [Show full text]
  • Z/TPF Application Modernization Using Standard and Open Middleware
    IBM® WebSphere® Front cover z/TPF Application Modernization using Standard and Open Middleware Understanding extreme transaction rates and availability in SOA Refacing z/TPF applications Leveraging z/TPF in an open systems environment Lisa Banks Bradd Kadlecik Mark Cooper Colette A. Manoni Chris Coughlin David McCreedy Jamie Farmer Carolyn Weiss Chris Filachek Joshua Wisniewski Mark Gambino ibm.com/redbooks International Technical Support Organization z/TPF Application Modernization using Standard and Open Middleware June 2013 SG24-8124-00 Note: Before using this information and the product it supports, read the information in “Notices” on page xi. First Edition (June 2013) This edition applies to z/TPF Enterprise Edition 1.1 PUT 9. © Copyright International Business Machines Corporation 2013. All rights reserved. Note to U.S. Government Users Restricted Rights -- Use, duplication or disclosure restricted by GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corp. Contents Notices . xi Trademarks . xii Preface . xiii Authors. xiii Now you can become a published author, too! . .xv Comments welcome. xvi Stay connected to IBM Redbooks . xvi Part 1. Overview . 1 Chapter 1. An introduction to z/TPF and its role in a service-oriented architecture . 3 1.1 Introduction . 4 1.2 z/TPF and service-oriented architecture . 4 1.3 z/TPF and WebSphere Application Server . 4 1.4 Overview of z/TPF. 5 1.5 TPF family of products . 5 1.6 Brief history of z/TPF . 6 1.7 Transaction . 6 1.8 Speed and reliability, availability, and scalability . 7 1.8.1 Speed and reliability. 7 1.8.2 Availability . 9 1.8.3 Scalability.
    [Show full text]
  • Multivariate Generalised Linear Mixed Models Via Sabrer (Sabre in R)
    Multivariate Generalised Linear Mixed Models via sabreR (Sabre in R) Rob Crouchley Dave Stott [email protected] [email protected] Centre for e-Science Centre for e-Science Lancaster University Lancaster University John Pritchard Dan Grose [email protected] [email protected] Centre for e-Science Centre for e-Science Lancaster University Lancaster University version 1 ii Contents Preface xv Acknowledgements xix 1LinearModelsI 1 1.1 Random EffectsANOVA....................... 1 1.2 The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient............... 2 1.3ParameterEstimationbyMaximumLikelihood.......... 3 1.4 Regression with level-2 effects.................... 5 1.5 Example C1. Linear Model of Pupil’s Maths Achievement . 5 1.5.1 Reference........................... 6 1.5.2 Data description for hsb.tab ................ 6 1.5.3 Variables........................... 6 1.6 Including School-Level Effects-Model2.............. 8 1.6.1 Sabrecommands....................... 8 1.6.2 Sabre log file......................... 9 1.6.3 Model1discussion...................... 11 1.6.4 Model2discussion...................... 11 1.7Exercises............................... 12 iii iv CONTENTS 1.8References............................... 12 2LinearModelsII 13 2.1Introduction.............................. 13 2.2Two-LevelRandomInterceptModels................ 13 2.3 General Two-Level Models Including Random Intercepts . 15 2.4Likelihood:general2-levelmodels................. 15 2.5Residuals............................... 16 2.6CheckingAssumptionsinMultilevelModels...........
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Profile
    Corporate Profile The SABRE Group Holdings, Inc. (The SABRE Group) is a world leader in the electronic distribution of travel-related products and services and is a leading provider of information technology solutions for the travel and transportation indus- try. Through The SABRE Group’s global distribution system, more than 30,000 travel agency locations, three million reg- istered individual consumers and numerous corporations access information on and book reservations with more than 400 airlines, more than 50 car rental companies, 35,000 hotel properties, and dozens of railways, tour companies, passenger ferries and cruise lines located throughout the world. The SABRE Group also provides a comprehensive suite of decision- support systems, software and consulting services to the travel and transportation industry, and is increasingly leveraging its expertise to offer solutions to companies in other industries that face similar complex operational issues. Airport author- ities, railroads, logistical service providers, lodging companies, oil and gas companies, and leaders in the financial services industry are all customers of The SABRE Group. The SABRE Group operates one of the world’s largest privately owned, real-time computer systems. The vast SABRE® network links over 130,000 terminals located in travel agencies, as well as many more privately owned personal computers, and has sent up to 190 million messages per day to the central data cen- ter located in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The data center is composed of 17 mainframe computers with over 4,000 MIPS of pro- cessing power and 15.3 terabytes of electronic storage. The SABRE Group’s objective is to be the leading provider of information technology solutions to the travel industry, and to broaden its customer base by expanding to other industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Transaction Processing: Past, Present, and Future
    Front cover Transaction Processing: Past, Present, and Future Redguides for Business Leaders Alex Louwe Kooijmans Elsie Ramos Niek De Greef Dominique Delhumeau Donna Eng Dillenberger Hilon Potter Nigel Williams Transaction processing in today’s business environment Business challenges and technology trends Role of the IBM mainframe Foreword Thriving in the Era of Ubiquitous Transactions I am absolutely obsessed with the concept of Transaction Processing because it is the very essence of every company on earth. A business is not in business unless it is successfully processing transactions of some kind. IBM® has been investing in, leading, and inventing Transaction Processing technology for as long as there has been programmable computing. It is no coincidence that the world’s economic infrastructure largely rests on IBM technology, such as mainframes, and fundamental financial activity occurs through CICS®, IMS™, and WebSphere® transaction engines. IBM continues to evolve the entire compendium of intellectual property as it relates to Transaction Processing so that companies like yours will have the sophisticated technology required to not only support but thrive in the new world of federated environments and interconnected enterprises, and Cloud services and mobile commerce with certainty and control. This melding of modularity and service-oriented techniques together with Transaction Processing science will provide every business the ability to deliver straight-through processing at the lowest possible cost and highest level of transactional integrity. Steve Mills IBM Senior Vice President and Group Executive, Software and Systems © Copyright IBM Corp. 2012. All rights reserved. 1 2 Transaction Processing: Past, Present, and Future Executive overview The role of IT is becoming more prominent in people’s daily lives and we are becoming increasingly dependent on computers.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 9215FQ14 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Category Pages Facilities & Buildings 3-10 General Reference 11-20 Human Resources
    2 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Category Pages Facilities & Buildings 3-10 General Reference 11-20 Human Resources 21-22 Legal 23-25 Marketing 26 Personal Names (Individuals) 27 Predecessor Companies 28-29 Products & Services 30-89 Public Relations 90 Research 91-97 April 10, 2007 9215FQ14 3 Facilities & Buildings Q. When did IBM first open its offices in my town? A. While it is not possible for us to provide such information for each and every office facility throughout the world, the following listing provides the date IBM offices were established in more than 300 U.S. and international locations: Adelaide, Australia 1914 Akron, Ohio 1917 Albany, New York 1919 Albuquerque, New Mexico 1940 Alexandria, Egypt 1934 Algiers, Algeria 1932 Altoona, Pennsylvania 1915 Amsterdam, Netherlands 1914 Anchorage, Alaska 1947 Ankara, Turkey 1935 Asheville, North Carolina 1946 Asuncion, Paraguay 1941 Athens, Greece 1935 Atlanta, Georgia 1914 Aurora, Illinois 1946 Austin, Texas 1937 Baghdad, Iraq 1947 Baltimore, Maryland 1915 Bangor, Maine 1946 Barcelona, Spain 1923 Barranquilla, Colombia 1946 Baton Rouge, Louisiana 1938 Beaumont, Texas 1946 Belgrade, Yugoslavia 1926 Belo Horizonte, Brazil 1934 Bergen, Norway 1946 Berlin, Germany 1914 (prior to) Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 1938 Beyrouth, Lebanon 1947 Bilbao, Spain 1946 Birmingham, Alabama 1919 Birmingham, England 1930 Bogota, Colombia 1931 Boise, Idaho 1948 Bordeaux, France 1932 Boston, Massachusetts 1914 Brantford, Ontario 1947 Bremen, Germany 1938 9215FQ14 4 Bridgeport, Connecticut 1919 Brisbane, Australia
    [Show full text]