DOCSLIB.ORG

Comparative Study of the Population Dynamics, Secondary Productivity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Jaime Gómez Gutiérrez for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Oceanography presented on December 12, 2003. Title: Comparative Study of the Population Dynamics, Secondary Productivity, and Reproductive Ecology of the Euphausiids Euphausia pacifica and Thysanoessa spinifera in the Oregon Upwelling Region Redacted for Privacy Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved I compare the seasonal abundance variation, population dynamics, fecundity, egg hatching mechanism and success, and apostome ciliate parasites of the euphausiids Euphausia pac?fica and Thysanoessa spinfera from the Oregon coast, USA. Community structure and nearshore distributions were examined from bi-weekly oceanographic surveys (1970-1972). This region has a strong cross-shelf change in euphausiid assemblages located about 45 km from shore. Euphausia pacflca and T. spinfera have life stage-segregated distributions, suggesting active location-maintenance strategies. Morphology and biometry of all the post-spawning embryonic stages and the hatching mechanisms of three broadcast-spawning (E. pacfica, T. spinfera and Thysanoe;sa inspinata) and one sac-spawning (Nematoscelisdjfficilis)euphausiids are described. The average embryo and chorion diameters were significantly larger for E. pacca (0.378,0.407 mm) than for T. spinfera (0.35 3, 0.363 mm) and T. inspinata (0.312, 0.333 mm). There are four hatching mechanisms. Some broadcast-spawning species have delayed hatching schedules, hatching as nauplius 2, metanauplius or calyptopis 1, rather than as the usual nauplius 1. Sac-spawning species sometimes hatch early as nauplius 2, rather than as the normal pseudometanauplius or metanauplius. Late and early hatching schedules were associated with low hatching success and small brood size. The brood sizes (BS) of E. pacca and T. spin(fera were estimated during incubations on 23 cruises. Thysanoessa spinifera had higher BS and extended its spawning areas farther offshore during 2002 than in 1999-2001. Euphausia pacfica had a stable inshore-offshore brood- size pattern from 2001 to 2003, and had greater BS than during 1999-2000. Elevated egg production during summer 2002 was associated with cooler, high chl-a conditions resulting from anomalously high equatorward transport. © Copyright by Jaime Gómez Gutiérrez December 12, 2003 All Rights Reserved Comparative Study of the Population Dynamics, Secondary Productivity, and Reproductive Ecology of the Euphausiids Euphausia pacifica and Thysanoessa spinfera in the Oregon Upwelling Region by Jaime Gómez Gutiérrez A DISSERTATION Submitted to Oregon State University In partial fulfillment of The requirements for the Degree of Doctor Philosophy Presented December 12, 2003 Commencement June 2004 Doctor of Philosophy dissertation of Jaime Gómez Gutiérrez presented on December 12, 2003. APPROVED: Redacted for Privacy Co-major Professor, representing Oceanography Redacted for Privacy ' Co-major Professor, representing Redacted for Privacy Dean of the College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences Redacted for Privacy Dean of tho' Jradóate School I understand that my dissertation will become part of the permanent collection of Oregon State University libraries. My Signature below authorizes release of my dissertation to any reader upon request. Redacted for Privacy Author ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I have been graced with many excellent people who have helping me along the way. I want to thank my major advisors, Charles B. Miller and William T. Peterson, for their friendship, unconditional support, the freedom in my research, and for the faith they put in me in the last five years. Charlie, your patience and generosity to share your knowledgeand your laboratory space are infinite, thanks for helping me in all my requests. You arethe best teacher I have ever and your research guide was superb and unconditional, youalways gave me a new way to see and solve the scientific problems I faced. I was honored to have a mentor like you. Your patience and help in improving my English and most importantly the ideas included in the thesis, particularly while I was writing the thesis, made it possible for me to defend my thesis on time. Bill, I really appreciate the optimism and confidence you gave me to come to Corvallis to work with you. I enjoyed working in your laboratory in summer 1997 when I started working with live zooplankton. Your unconditional support, your experience and good sense of humor makes you the perfect research advisor. I'm so glad I had the opportunity to be part of your Newport zooplankton research group. I also wish to thank the other members of my Graduate Committee Patricia A. Wheeler, Bruce McCune, and William Warren for their feedback and encouragement through this thesis. I thank Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas (CICIMAR) from the Instituto Politécnico Nacional in La Paz, Baja California Sur (Mexico) for the economical support during my entire PhD program. I particularly thank Victor Manuel Gómez Muñoz, Francisco ArreguIn Sanchez, Ricardo Palomares Garcia, Sergio Hernández Trujillo, Roberto Felix Uraga, and Jose Luis OrtIz Galindo, for their unconditional help with the mountain of paperwork and reports for the Instituto Politécnico Nacional during my work in Oregon. I was also supported by a Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (SNI, 15876), COFAA-IPN fellowship level IV and a Mexican PhD grant from Consejo Nacional de Ciencias y TecnologIa (CONACyT, 122676) tostudy at Oregon State University. This research was partially supported by funds provided by the Office of Naval Research (National Ocean Partnership Program) in 1999-2000, the U.S. GLOBEC NEP (NA860P0589) program in2001-2003,jointly funded by the National Science Foundation and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, provided ship time and staff assistance, and by two non-consecutive Mamie Markham Research awards from HatfieldMarine Science Center (HMSC, Newport OR). I would like particularly to express my gratitude to Marnie Markham's family for giving me the Markham Research Award during2001-2002and2003-2004.This economical support helped me to purchase critical equipment, supplies and services to complete my experimental work. The significance of this award is that provided me the economical independence that any graduate student needs. I thank the Warren Denner family and the selection of candidates committee for giving me the honor of receiving the Warren W. Denner Memorial Graduate Student Fellowship Award (September 20, 2002). It was an unforgettable surprise that Krista Longnecker conspired to be sure I was there during the COAS meeting award. This research had the input and critics of several creative, ingenious, and professional people that substantially improved the content of each chapter of this dissertation. Therefore I deeply give thanks to Charles B. Miller (COAS), William T. Peterson (NOAA), Margaret Knight (Sb), Edward Brinton (Sb), Annie Townsend (Sb), Alex de Robertis (NOAA), Richard Brodeur (NOAA), Jennifer Cram (COAS), Cheryl Morgan (HMSC), Phillip L. Hertzler (Central Michigan University), Stephen C. Landers (Troy University), Frank J. Morado (NOAA-Seattle), Denis Lynn (University of Guelph), Gerhard Scholtz (Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin), Waldo Wakefield (NMFSIHMSC), Masayuki Saigusa (Okayama University), Robin Ross (SBCU), and Jannine Roudy-Cuzin (Observatorire Océanologique, France) for their critical and valuable comments to the original manuscripts. I thank Al Soeldner for his unconditional and proffesional assistance for the SEM micrographs for the chapters 8 and 9. In particular, I wish to thank my 'long-distance advisors' Edward Brinton, Margaret Knight and Annie Townsend for their friendship, the review of the chapters 3 and 4 and unlimited help during all those years I have been studying euphausiids at Baja California and Oregon (circa 1990). All you are a source of inspiration, dedication and certainly an excellent example of the kind of scientists than any graduate student (including myself) would like become some day. This research was possible only because I was lucky to work with bold, friendly and hard working people that apparently enjoy the rough Oregonian sea conditions: I am in debt to my dear friends Leah R. Feinberg, Tracy Shaw, Julie Keister, Anders Roestad, Mitch Vance, and Jesse Lamb from HMSC and the WV Elakha, WV New Horizon and R/V Wecoma crew (particularly Ron Barrell, Perry York, Daryl Swensen, Toby Martin, and Marc J. Willis) and many other for their collaboration in the collection of the live samples between 1999 and 2003. Se-Jong Ju and Rodger Harvey (Cheasapeake Biological Center, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Sciences) gave me all your support and analyzed the lipid composition of the euphausiid eggs that due time constrains were not included in the thesis. Dr. Patricia Wheeler, along her wonderful group of students and technicians, provided the Chl-a data for the L-TOP cruises, and Leah Feinberg, Tracy Shaw and Julie Keister took care of the Chl-a data for the RIV Elakha and Mesoscale cruises used in the chapters 6 and 7 of fecundity of euphausiids and their data of euphausiid dry weight. To my dear office mates and friends Cheryl Morgan, Jennifer Cram,and Marnie Jo Zirbel, I had a great time with all you talking about everything my poor English allows me, your endurance, patience and support and academic experience will never will be forgotten and made every day in the laboratory a fun experience. Irma Delson you are perhaps the most loved
Recommended publications
  • Special Issue Featuring: a Case Study on Black Gill in Georgia Shrimp

    Special Issue Featuring: a Case Study on Black Gill in Georgia Shrimp

    Volume 29 • Number 4 • Winter 2015 Special Issue Featuring: A Case Study on Black Gill in Georgia Shrimp Volume 29 • Number 4 • Winter 2015 The Mystery of Black Gill: Shrimpers in the South Atlantic Face Off with a Cryptic Parasite BY JILL M. GAMBILL, ALLISON E. DOYLE, RICHARD F. LEE, PH.D., PATRICK J. GEER, ANNA N. WALKER, PH.D., LINDSEY G. PARKER, PH.D., AND MARC E. FRISCHER, PH.D. ABSTRACT In the Southeast United States, an unidentified parasite is infecting shrimp and presenting new challenges for an already struggling industry. Emerging research in Georgia is investigating the resulting condition, known as Black Gill, to better understand this newest threat to the state’s most valuable commercial fishery. Researchers, shrimpers, extension agents, and fishery managers are working collaboratively to gather baseline data on where, when, and how frequently Black Gill is occurring, as well as partnering to determine its epidemiology, dispersal, and possible intervention strategies. Savannah, Ga. – In 2013, after years of intense competition from lower priced imports and financial pressures stemming Figure 1. A Georgia white shrimp displays symptoms of the from the rising cost of fuel and insurance, Georgia shrimpers Black Gill condition around its gills. Courtesy of Rachael were poised for a comeback as they looked forward to a Randall and Chelsea Parrish, 2015 profitable year. Shrimp prices had tripled, as a consequence of a bacterial disease infecting the supply of farmed shrimp A LANDMARK YEAR from Asia (Loc et al. 2013). Commercial food shrimp landings in 2013 were the lowest Georgia shrimpers took to the water with high expectations, in recent history.
  • Penaeid Shrimp in Chesapeake Bay: Population Growth and Black Gill Disease Syndrome

    Penaeid Shrimp in Chesapeake Bay: Population Growth and Black Gill Disease Syndrome

    W&M ScholarWorks VIMS Articles Virginia Institute of Marine Science 2021 Penaeid Shrimp in Chesapeake Bay: Population Growth and Black Gill Disease Syndrome Troy D. Tuckey Virginia Institute of Marine Science Jillian L. Swinford Mary C. Fabrizio Virginia Institute of Marine Science Hamish J. Small Virginia Institute of Marine Science Jeffrey D. Shields Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Tuckey, Troy D.; Swinford, Jillian L.; Fabrizio, Mary C.; Small, Hamish J.; and Shields, Jeffrey D., Penaeid Shrimp in Chesapeake Bay: Population Growth and Black Gill Disease Syndrome (2021). Marine and Coastal Fisheries, 13, 159-173. DOI: 10.1002/mcf2.10143 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Virginia Institute of Marine Science at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in VIMS Articles by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Marine and Coastal Fisheries 13:159–173, 2021 © 2021 The Authors. Marine and Coastal Fisheries published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Fisheries Society ISSN: 1942-5120 online DOI: 10.1002/mcf2.10143 ARTICLE Penaeid Shrimp in Chesapeake Bay: Population Growth and Black Gill Disease Syndrome Troy D. Tuckey* Virginia Institute of Marine Science, William & Mary, 1370 Greate Road, Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062, USA Jillian L. Swinford Texas Parks and Wildlife, Coastal Fisheries Division, Perry R. Bass Marine Fisheries Research Center, 3864 Farm to Market Road 3280, Palacios, Texas 77465, USA Mary C.
  • Prevalent Ciliate Symbiosis on Copepods: High Genetic Diversity and Wide Distribution Detected Using Small Subunit Ribosomal RNA Gene

    Prevalent Ciliate Symbiosis on Copepods: High Genetic Diversity and Wide Distribution Detected Using Small Subunit Ribosomal RNA Gene

    Prevalent Ciliate Symbiosis on Copepods: High Genetic Diversity and Wide Distribution Detected Using Small Subunit Ribosomal RNA Gene Zhiling Guo1,2, Sheng Liu1, Simin Hu1, Tao Li1, Yousong Huang4, Guangxing Liu4, Huan Zhang2,4*, Senjie Lin2,3* 1 Key Laboratory of Marine Bio-resources Sustainable Utilization, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Science, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 2 Department of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut, Groton, Connecticut, United States of America, 3 Marine Biodiversity and Global Change Laboratory, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China, 4 Department of Environmental Science, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, Shandong, China Abstract Toward understanding the genetic diversity and distribution of copepod-associated symbiotic ciliates and the evolutionary relationships with their hosts in the marine environment, we developed a small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (18S rDNA)- based molecular method and investigated the genetic diversity and genotype distribution of the symbiotic ciliates on copepods. Of the 10 copepod species representing six families collected from six locations of Pacific and Atlantic Oceans, 9 were found to harbor ciliate symbionts. Phylogenetic analysis of the 391 ciliate 18S rDNA sequences obtained revealed seven groups (ribogroups), six (containing 99% of all the sequences) belonging to subclass Apostomatida, the other clustered with peritrich ciliate Vorticella gracilis. Among the Apostomatida groups, Group III were essentially identical to Vampyrophrya pelagica, and the other five groups represented the undocumented ciliates that were close to Vampyrophrya/ Gymnodinioides/Hyalophysa. Group VI ciliates were found in all copepod species but one (Calanus sinicus), and were most abundant among all ciliate sequences obtained, indicating that they are the dominant symbiotic ciliates universally associated with copepods.
  • Handbook of Shrimp Diseases

    Handbook of Shrimp Diseases

    LOAN COPY ONLY TAMU-H-95-001 C3 Handbook of Shrimp Diseases Aquaculture S.K. Johnson Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences Texas A&M University 90-601 (rev) Introduction 2 Shrimp Species 2 Shrimp Anatomy 2 Obvious Manifestations ofShrimp Disease 3 Damaged Shells , 3 Inflammation and Melanization 3 Emaciation and Nutritional Deficiency 4 Muscle Necrosis 5 Tumors and Other Tissue Problems 5 Surface Fouling 6 Cramped Shrimp 6 Unusual Behavior 6 Developmental Problems 6 Growth Problems 7 Color Anomalies 7 Microbes 8 Viruses 8 Baceteria and Rickettsia 10 Fungus 12 Protozoa 12 Haplospora 13 Gregarina 15 Body Invaders 16 Surface Infestations 16 Worms 18 Trematodes 18 Cestodes 18 Nematodes 18 Environment 20 Publication of this handbook is a coop erative effort of the Texas A&M Univer sity Sea Grant College Program, the Texas A&M Department of Wildlife and $2.00 Fisheries Sciences and the Texas Additional copies available from: Agricultural Extension Service. Produc Sea Grant College Program tion is supported in part by Institutional 1716 Briarcrest Suite 603 Grant No. NA16RG0457-01 to Texas Bryan, Texas 77802 A&M University by the National Sea TAMU-SG-90-601(r) Grant Program, National Oceanic and 2M August 1995 Atmospheric Administration, U.S. De NA89AA-D-SG139 partment of Commerce. A/1-1 Handbook ofShrimp Diseases S.K. Johnson Extension Fish Disease Specialist This handbook is designed as an information source and tail end (abdomen). The parts listed below are apparent upon field guide for shrimp culturists, commercial fishermen, and outside examination (Fig. 1). others interested in diseases or abnormal conditions of shrimp.
  • Revisions to the Classification, Nomenclature, and Diversity of Eukaryotes

    Revisions to the Classification, Nomenclature, and Diversity of Eukaryotes

    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Biological Sciences Faculty Publications Biological Sciences 9-26-2018 Revisions to the Classification, Nomenclature, and Diversity of Eukaryotes Christopher E. Lane Et Al Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/bio_facpubs Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology ISSN 1066-5234 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Revisions to the Classification, Nomenclature, and Diversity of Eukaryotes Sina M. Adla,* , David Bassb,c , Christopher E. Laned, Julius Lukese,f , Conrad L. Schochg, Alexey Smirnovh, Sabine Agathai, Cedric Berneyj , Matthew W. Brownk,l, Fabien Burkim,PacoCardenas n , Ivan Cepi cka o, Lyudmila Chistyakovap, Javier del Campoq, Micah Dunthornr,s , Bente Edvardsent , Yana Eglitu, Laure Guillouv, Vladimır Hamplw, Aaron A. Heissx, Mona Hoppenrathy, Timothy Y. Jamesz, Anna Karn- kowskaaa, Sergey Karpovh,ab, Eunsoo Kimx, Martin Koliskoe, Alexander Kudryavtsevh,ab, Daniel J.G. Lahrac, Enrique Laraad,ae , Line Le Gallaf , Denis H. Lynnag,ah , David G. Mannai,aj, Ramon Massanaq, Edward A.D. Mitchellad,ak , Christine Morrowal, Jong Soo Parkam , Jan W. Pawlowskian, Martha J. Powellao, Daniel J. Richterap, Sonja Rueckertaq, Lora Shadwickar, Satoshi Shimanoas, Frederick W. Spiegelar, Guifre Torruellaat , Noha Youssefau, Vasily Zlatogurskyh,av & Qianqian Zhangaw a Department of Soil Sciences, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, S7N 5A8, SK, Canada b Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, United Kingdom
  • Antarctica) During an Extensive Phaeocystis Antarctica Bloom

    Antarctica) During an Extensive Phaeocystis Antarctica Bloom

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/271635; this version posted February 26, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Microzooplankton distribution in the Amundsen Sea Polynya (Antarctica) during an extensive Phaeocystis antarctica bloom Rasmus Swalethorp*1,2,3, Julie Dinasquet*1,4,5, Ramiro Logares6, Stefan Bertilsson7, Sanne Kjellerup2,3, Anders K. Krabberød8, Per-Olav Moksnes3, Torkel G. Nielsen2, and Lasse Riemann4 1 Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, USA 2 National Institute of Aquatic Resources (DTU Aqua), Technical University of Denmark, Denmark 3 Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Sweden 4 Marine Biological Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark 5 Department of Natural Sciences, Linnaeus University, Sweden 6 Institute of Marine Sciences (ICM), CSIC, Spain 7 Department of Ecology and Genetics: Limnology and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Sweden 8 Department of Biosciences, Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology (Evogene), University of Oslo, Norway *Equal contribution, correspondence: [email protected], [email protected] Key words: ciliate; dinoflagellate; growth rates; Southern Ocean; Antarctica; Amundsen Sea polynya; Gymnodinium spp. 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/271635; this version posted February 26, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
  • Phylogenetic Position of the Apostome Ciliates (Phylum Ciliophora, Subclass Apostomatia) Tested Using Small Subunit Rrna Gene Sequences*

    Phylogenetic Position of the Apostome Ciliates (Phylum Ciliophora, Subclass Apostomatia) Tested Using Small Subunit Rrna Gene Sequences*

    ©Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Phylogenetic position of the apostome ciliates (Phylum Ciliophora, Subclass Apostomatia) tested using small subunit rRNA gene sequences* J o h n C . C L AM P , P h y l l i s C . B RADB UR Y , M i c h a e l a C . S TR ÜDER -K Y P KE & D e n i s H . L Y N N Abstract: The apostomes have been assigned historically to two major groups of ciliates – now called the Class Phyllopharyngea and Class Oligohymenophorea. We set about to test these competing hypotheses of relationship using sequences of the small sub- unit rRNA gene from isolates of five species of apostomes: Gymnodinioides pitelkae from Maine; Gymnodinioides sp. from North Ca- rolina; Hyalophysa chattoni from Florida and from North Carolina; H. lwoffi from North Carolina; and Vampyrophrya pelagica from North Carolina. These apostome ciliates were unambiguously related to taxa in the Class Oligohymenophorea using Bayesian in- ference, maximum parsimony, and neighbor-joining algorithms to infer phylogenetic relationship. Thus, their assignment as the Subclass Apostomatia within this class is confirmed by these genetic data. The two isolates of Hyalophysa chattoni were harvested from the same crustacean host, Palaemonetes pugio, at localities separated by slightly more than 1225 km, and yet they showed only 0.06% genetic divergence, suggesting that they represent a single population. Key words: Apostomes, crustacean, exuviotroph, Gammarus mucronatus, Marinogammarus obtusatus, Oligohymenophorea. Introduction In morphologically-based classifications, apostome ciliates have been placed with either one or the other Over the past 20 years, sequences of the small sub- of two major taxa, now considered classes (BRADBURY unit rRNA (SSrRNA) gene have been used to confirm 1989).
  • 140 Cor Frontale Supraesophageal Ganglion . . K Antennary Optic

    140 Cor Frontale Supraesophageal Ganglion . . K Antennary Optic

    140 Cor Pyloric Dorsal frontalle stomach abdominal Supraesophageal art ry ganglion . K Ophthalmic / Ostium ® Antennary artery Cardiac / / Heart \ Segmental Optic \ artery i stomach/Cecum / / Hepato- \ artery nerve I / / / / / pancreas\ Hindgut Antennal nerve Rectum ganglion Hepatic artery Subesophageal Ventral Midgut ganglion nerve cord dorsomedial branchiocardiac dorsomedial Antenna Antennule intestinal / urogastric Compound eye posterior margina hepatic Th°racopods lateromarginal I inferior \ intercervical parabranchial postcervical B Uropod Telson Figure 47 Decapoda: A. Diagrammatic astacidean with gills and musculature removed to show major organ systems; B. Diagrammatic nephropoidean carapace illustrating carapace grooves [after Holthuis, 1974]; C. Phyllosoma larva. ORDER DECAPODA 141 midgut or the other, pierces the ventral nerve cord, and indistinct from the fused ganglia of the mandibles, maxil- then branches anteriorly and posteriorly. The anterior lulae, maxillae, and first 2 pairs of maxillipeds. The gang­ branch, the ventral thoracic artery, supplies blood to the lia of the first 3 pairs of pereopods are segmental; the mouthparts, nerve cord, and 1st 3 pairs of pereopods. ganglia of the 4th and 5th pairs lie very close together. The course of this artery cannot be traced until the Follow the ventral nerve cord into the abdomen and stomach and hepatic cecum have been removed. The identify the abdominal ganglia. posterior branch, the ventral abdominal artery, which Larval development is direct (epimorphic) in all fresh­ also should be traced later, provides blood to the 4th and water taxa; in marine taxa early developmental stages 5th pairs of pereopods, nerve cord, and parts of the ven­ are passed through in the egg and hatching usually occurs tral abdomen.
  • Euphausiacea (Crustacea) of the North Pacific

    Euphausiacea (Crustacea) of the North Pacific

    UC San Diego Bulletin of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography Title Euphausiacea (Crustacea) of the North Pacific Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/62h3k734 Authors Boden, Brian P Johnson, Martin W Brinton, Edward Publication Date 1955-11-15 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California THE EUPHAUSIACEA (CRUSTACEA) OF THE NORTH PACIFIC BY BRIAN P. BODEN, MARTIN W. JOHNSON, AND EDWARD BRINTON UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES 1955 BULLETIN OF THE SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA EDITORS: CLAUDE E. ZOBELL, ROBERT S. ARTHUR, DENIS L. FOX Volume 6, No. 8, pp. 287–400, 55 figures in text Submitted by editors November 5,1954 Issued November 15, 1955 Price, $1.50 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON, ENGLAND [CONTRIBUTION FROM THE SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY, NO. 796] PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONTENTS THE EUPHAUSIACEA (CRUSTACEA) OF THE NORTH PACIFIC BY BRIAN P. BODEN, MARTIN W. JOHNSON, AND EDWARD BRINTON INTRODUCTION AS A PART of the Marine Life Research Program of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography (a member of the California Coöperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations) an increased effort is being made to describe and evaluate the various organic factors that are important in the biological economy of the sea. In attacking the problem, the most expedient procedure is to study in detail the various components of the plankton, for it is well known that these components in varying degrees of importance provide directly the basic food for the Fig.
  • Fusiforma Themisticola N. Gen., N. Sp., a New Genus and Species Of

    Fusiforma Themisticola N. Gen., N. Sp., a New Genus and Species Of

    Protist, Vol. 164, 793–810, November 2013 http://www.elsevier.de/protis Published online date 23 October 2013 ORIGINAL PAPER Fusiforma themisticola n. gen., n. sp., a New Genus and Species of Apostome Ciliate Infecting the Hyperiid Amphipod Themisto libellula in the Canadian Beaufort Sea (Arctic Ocean), and Establishment of the Pseudocolliniidae (Ciliophora, Apostomatia) a,1 b,c d Chitchai Chantangsi , Denis H. Lynn , Sonja Rueckert , e a f Anna J. Prokopowicz , Somsak Panha , and Brian S. Leander a Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Phayathai Road, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand b Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada c Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada d School of Life, Sport and Social Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Sighthill Campus, Sighthill Court, Edinburgh EH11 4BN, Scotland, United Kingdom e Québec-Océan, Département de Biologie, Université Laval, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada f Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Departments of Zoology and Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada Submitted May 30, 2013; Accepted September 16, 2013 Monitoring Editor: Genoveva F. Esteban A novel parasitic ciliate Fusiforma themisticola n. gen., n. sp. was discovered infecting 4.4% of the hyperiid amphipod Themisto libellula. Ciliates were isolated from a formaldehyde-fixed whole amphi- pod and the DNA was extracted for amplification of the small subunit (SSU) rRNA gene. Sequence and phylogenetic analyses showed unambiguously that this ciliate is an apostome and about 2% diver- gent from the krill-infesting apostome species assigned to the genus Pseudocollinia. Protargol silver impregnation showed a highly unusual infraciliature for an apostome.
  • Microzooplankton Distribution in the Amundsen Sea Polynya (Antarctica) During an Extensive Phaeocystis Antarctica Bloom

    Microzooplankton Distribution in the Amundsen Sea Polynya (Antarctica) During an Extensive Phaeocystis Antarctica Bloom

    Microzooplankton distribution in the Amundsen Sea Polynya (Antarctica) during an extensive Phaeocystis antarctica bloom Rasmus Swalethorp *1,2,3 , Julie Dinasquet *1,4,5 , Ramiro Logares 6, Stefan Bertilsson 7, Sanne Kjellerup 2,3 , Anders K. Krabberød 8, Per-Olav Moksnes 3, Torkel G. Nielsen 2, and Lasse Riemann 4 1 Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, USA 2 National Institute of Aquatic Resources (DTU Aqua), Technical University of Denmark, Denmark 3 Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Sweden 4 Marine Biological Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark 5 Department of Natural Sciences, Linnaeus University, Sweden 6 Institute of Marine Sciences (ICM), CSIC, Spain 7 Department of Ecology and Genetics: Limnology and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Sweden 8 Department of Biosciences, Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology (Evogene), University of Oslo, Norway *Equal contribution, correspondence: [email protected], [email protected] Key words: ciliate; dinoflagellate; growth rates; Southern Ocean; Antarctica; Amundsen Sea polynya; Gymnodinium spp. 1 Abbreviations: ASP: Amundsen Sea Polynya; SO: Southern Ocean; HNF: Heterotrophic nanoflagellates; OTU: Operational Taxonomic Unit, DFM: Deep Fluorescence Maximum 2 Abstract In Antarctica, summer is a time of extreme environmental shifts resulting in large coastal phytoplankton blooms fueling the food web. Despite the importance of the microbial loop in remineralizing biomass from primary production, studies of how microzooplankton communities respond to such blooms in the Southern Ocean are rather scarce. Microzooplankton (ciliate and dinoflagellate) communities were investigated combining microscopy and 18S rRNA sequencing analyses in the Amundsen Sea Polynya during an extensive summer bloom of Phaeocystis antarctica .
  • Protista (PDF)

    Protista (PDF)

    1 = Astasiopsis distortum (Dujardin,1841) Bütschli,1885 South Scandinavian Marine Protoctista ? Dingensia Patterson & Zölffel,1992, in Patterson & Larsen (™ Heteromita angusta Dujardin,1841) Provisional Check-list compiled at the Tjärnö Marine Biological * Taxon incertae sedis. Very similar to Cryptaulax Skuja Laboratory by: Dinomonas Kent,1880 TJÄRNÖLAB. / Hans G. Hansson - 1991-07 - 1997-04-02 * Taxon incertae sedis. Species found in South Scandinavia, as well as from neighbouring areas, chiefly the British Isles, have been considered, as some of them may show to have a slightly more northern distribution, than what is known today. However, species with a typical Lusitanian distribution, with their northern Diphylleia Massart,1920 distribution limit around France or Southern British Isles, have as a rule been omitted here, albeit a few species with probable norhern limits around * Marine? Incertae sedis. the British Isles are listed here until distribution patterns are better known. The compiler would be very grateful for every correction of presumptive lapses and omittances an initiated reader could make. Diplocalium Grassé & Deflandre,1952 (™ Bicosoeca inopinatum ??,1???) * Marine? Incertae sedis. Denotations: (™) = Genotype @ = Associated to * = General note Diplomita Fromentel,1874 (™ Diplomita insignis Fromentel,1874) P.S. This list is a very unfinished manuscript. Chiefly flagellated organisms have yet been considered. This * Marine? Incertae sedis. provisional PDF-file is so far only published as an Intranet file within TMBL:s domain. Diplonema Griessmann,1913, non Berendt,1845 (Diptera), nec Greene,1857 (Coel.) = Isonema ??,1???, non Meek & Worthen,1865 (Mollusca), nec Maas,1909 (Coel.) PROTOCTISTA = Flagellamonas Skvortzow,19?? = Lackeymonas Skvortzow,19?? = Lowymonas Skvortzow,19?? = Milaneziamonas Skvortzow,19?? = Spira Skvortzow,19?? = Teixeiromonas Skvortzow,19?? = PROTISTA = Kolbeana Skvortzow,19?? * Genus incertae sedis.