DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 11 ) INTELSAT SA, Et Al.,1 ) Case No. 20-32299

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 11 ) INTELSAT SA, Et Al.,1 ) Case No. 20-32299 Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 2121 Filed 04/27/21 Entered 04/27/21 17:11:48 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 32 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) INTELSAT S.A., et al.,1 ) Case No. 20-32299 (KLP) ) Debtors. ) (Jointly Administered) ) DECLARATION OF DISINTERESTEDNESS BY DELOITTE LLP IN CONNECTION WITH THE RETENTION OF DELOITTE TAX LLP BY THE DEBTORS FOR TAX SERVICES I, Edward Morris, under penalty of perjury declare as follows: 1. I am a Partner at Deloitte LLP (“Deloitte UK”), which has offices located at 1 New Street Square, London, EC4A 3HQ. I am duly authorized to make and submit this declaration (“the Declaration”) on behalf of Deloitte UK as a subcontractor to Deloitte Tax LLP in relation to the tax consultancy and transfer pricing benchmarking analysis work, described below. 2. The Declaration is submitted pursuant to the Order (I) Authorizing the Debtors to Retain and Employ Deloitte Tax LLP to Provide Tax Services to the Debtors Effective as of May 13, 2020, and (II) Granting Related Relief [D.I. 827] (the “Order”), authorizing the above-captioned debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the “Debtors”) to retain Deloitte Tax LLP (“Deloitte Tax”). 1 Due to the large number of Debtors in these chapter 11 cases (collectively, the “Chapter 11 Cases”), for which joint administration has been granted, a complete list of the Debtor entities and the last four digits of their federal tax identification numbers is not provided herein. A complete list may be obtained on the website of the Debtors’ claims and noticing agent at https://cases.stretto.com/intelsat. The location of the Debtors’ service address is: 7900 Tysons One Place, McLean, VA 22102. -2- Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 2121 Filed 04/27/21 Entered 04/27/21 17:11:48 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 32 3. As set forth more fully in the Debtors’ application to retain Deloitte Tax [D.I. 340] (the “Application”),2 the Debtors sought to retain Deloitte Tax to provide certain tax services in connection with, among other things, transfer pricing services, including the preparation of a set of transfer pricing benchmarking memos, transfer pricing documentation reports, and a transfer pricing master file for the periods of January 1, 2019 through fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, January 1, 2020 through fiscal year ending December 31, 2020, and January 1, 2021 through fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 (collectively, the “Transfer Pricing Work”). 4. The Application was supported by the declaration of Jeffrey E. Clegg, a partner of Deloitte Tax, a copy of which is annexed to the Application at Exhibit B.3 As stated in the declaration, it was contemplated that Deloitte Tax would engage, on a subcontracting basis, certain DTT Member Firms. Pursuant to an Inter-firm Work Referral Form dated March 2, 2021 (as amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Work Referral Form”), Deloitte Tax engaged Deloitte UK as a subcontractor to assist with the Transfer Pricing Work. Specifically, the Work Referral Form contemplates that Deloitte UK will perform “UK general tax consulting and transfer pricing services.” A copy of the Work Referral Form is attached hereto at Exhibit A. 5. As set forth in the Order, third party subcontractors engaged by Deloitte Tax are required to submit separate declarations of disinterestedness (see paragraph 14 of the Order). Accordingly, this Declaration is being made pursuant to the terms of the Order and 2 Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Application. 3 The declaration of Jeffrey E. Clegg and the disclosures contained therein, as well as all supplemental declarations filed by Mr. Clegg in these cases, are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part hereof. -3 - Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 2121 Filed 04/27/21 Entered 04/27/21 17:11:48 Desc Main Document Page 3 of 32 in furtherance of Deloitte UK’s engagement as a subcontractor in connection with performing services for the Debtors. 6. The statements set forth in this Declaration are based upon my personal knowledge, information and belief, and/or client matter records kept in the ordinary course of business that were reviewed by me or other personnel of Deloitte UK. 7. Deloitte UK undertook a search of the names included on the parties-in- interest list provided by the Debtors, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit B hereto, to determine and to disclose whether it is or has been employed by, or has any relationships with, certain of the Debtors’ significant creditors and other parties-in-interest (“Potential Parties-in-Interest”). Deloitte UK researched its databases of client relationships and connections and performed reasonable due diligence to determine whether it had any relationships with the Debtors and the significant Potential Parties-in-Interest where such relationships are related to an engagement by Deloitte UK involving the Debtors. This included database searches across the following: • Deloitte UK’s conflicts database which details current opportunities and engagements which are current or have been completed in the past 4 years; • Deloitte UK’s billing system; • Deloitte UK’s business relationships management system; and • Deloitte UK’s local restricted entities database. 8. Based upon the searches undertaken above, we can confirm that at all times during Deloitte UK’s engagement in connection with the tax consulting and transfer pricing benchmarking analysis supporting the Transfer Pricing Work, Deloitte UK did not and currently does not (a) hold any interest adverse to the Debtors; or (b) have a relationship to the Debtors, their significant creditors, certain other significant parties-in-interest, or to the -4- Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 2121 Filed 04/27/21 Entered 04/27/21 17:11:48 Desc Main Document Page 4 of 32 attorneys that are known to be assisting the Debtors in the Chapter 11 Cases, except as may be disclosed herein or in any attachment hereto.4 9. From time to time, Deloitte UK has provided or may currently provide services, and likely will continue to provide services, to certain creditors of the Debtors and various other parties potentially adverse to the Debtors in matters unrelated to the Chapter 11 Cases. 10. Deloitte UK has relationships with thousands of clients, some of which may be creditors of the Debtors or other Potential Parties-in-Interest, as listed on Exhibit B attached hereto. Accordingly, Deloitte UK has had, currently has and/or may have in the future relationships with such parties, or provided, may be currently providing, and/or may provide in the future professional services to certain of these parties in matters unrelated to the Chapter 11 Cases. Additionally, certain significant Potential Parties-in-Interest have or may have provided goods or services, may currently provide goods or services, and/or may in the future provide goods or services to Deloitte UK in matters unrelated to the Chapter 11 Cases. 11. In addition to the foregoing, one or more of the Debtors may be an affiliate of BC Partners Holdings Ltd., which is an audit client of Deloitte UK based in Guernsey. 12. Deloitte UK believes that the relationships described herein have no bearing on the Transfer Pricing Work and, in particular, the tax consulting and transfer pricing 4 In addition to the tax consultancy work and transfer pricing services that Deloitte UK is providing to the Debtors as a subcontractor to Deloitte Tax, Deloitte UK is, or shortly will be, separately providing assistance to dlaw (a Luxembourg company), which has been retained by the Debtors as an ordinary course professional, to provide legal services such as corporate and employment law to the Debtors in various jurisdictions, including, without limitation, Canada, the United Kingdom and countries of the European Union. -5 - Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 2121 Filed 04/27/21 Entered 04/27/21 17:11:48 Desc Main Document Page 5 of 32 benchmarking analysis for which Deloitte UK was subcontracted for by Deloitte Tax in the Debtors’ Chapter 11 Cases. Furthermore, such relationships do not impair Deloitte UK’s disinterestedness. 12. In addition to the searches described above, Deloitte UK performed queries to determine whether any of the Deloitte UK partners and other personnel performing services for the Debtors, or any member of such individual’s immediate family5: (i) owns any direct investment in the Debtors or any of their non-debtor affiliates; (ii) holds a claim against or interest adverse to the Debtors or their non-debtor affiliates; (iii) is or was an officer, director, or employee of the Debtors or their non-debtor affiliates; (iv) is related to or has any connections to the bankruptcy judges in the Eastern District of Virginia; and (v) based on the list of individuals included on the staff directories maintained on the Office of the United States Trustee in Region 4’s website, is related to or has any connections to any such individuals working in the Office of United States Trustee for Region 4. 13. Through reasonable inquiry, Deloitte UK represents that it did not receive any other affirmative responses to any of the aforementioned questions. Accordingly, I do not believe there is any connection between the personnel of Deloitte UK who are performing the tax consulting and transfer pricing benchmarking analysis for the Debtors and the United States Bankruptcy Judge presiding in the Chapter 11 Cases, the U.S. Trustee for Region 4, and the Assistant United States Trustee for the Eastern District of Virginia, or the attorneys therefor assigned to these cases.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spotlight: Shareholders Are Dispersed and Diverse
    POLICY SPOTLIGHT APRIL 2019 Shareholders Are Dispersed And Diverse Index funds have democratized access to diversified investment for millions of savers, who are investing for long-term goals, like retirement. As index funds are currently growing more quickly than actively managed funds, some critics have expressed concern about increasing concentration of public company ownership in the hands of index fund managers. While it is true that assets under management (or ‘AUM’) in index portfolios have grown, index funds and ETFs represent less than 10% of global equity assets.1 Further, equity investors, and hence public company shareholders, are dispersed across a diverse range of asset owners and asset managers. As of year-end 2017, Vanguard, BlackRock, and State Street manage $3.5 trillion, $3.3 trillion, and $1.8 trillion in global equity assets, respectively.2 These investors represent a minority position in the $83 trillion global equity market. As shown in Exhibit 1, the combined AUM of these three managers represents just over 10% of global equity assets. The largest 20 asset managers only account for 22%. Moreover, about two-thirds of all global equity investment is conducted by asset owners choosing to invest in equities directly rather than by employing an asset manager to make investments on their behalf. Exhibit 1: Equity Market Investors3 Total Equity Market Capitalization 100% All Asset Managers 35% Top 20 Managers 22% Top 10 Managers 17% VGD 4% BLK 4% SSgA 2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Exhibit 1 alone does not paint a complete picture of the diversity of equity market investors, as there is significant variation amongst asset managers and asset owners.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Business Review International Mobile Telecommunications Services, Including Wimax
    December 2007 - SPECIAL EDITION: THE TOP-10 SPACE BUSINESS STORIES OF 2007 - #1 - M&A Transactions Keep Pace #5 - 50th Anniversary of Sputnik Despite challenging credit markets, merger, As we celebrate the 50th anniversary of the acquisition and investment activity kept pace in satellite that introduced the “space age”, 2007. Abertis & Caisse des Dépôts et approximately 1,000 satellites now orbit the consignations purchase 32% (€1.07B) and Earth and the space business has grown to 25.5% (€862.7M) stakes, respectively, in more than $100 billion in annual revenues. Eutelsat (Jan.). GE Capital sells back its 19.5% #6 - Satellite Manufacturers Remain Busy interest in SES Global for €588 million in cash 18 commercial satellite orders announced in and assets including stakes in AsiaSat, Star 2007. Ball Aerospace & Technologies: One and Orbcomm (Feb.). JSAT & SKY WorldView-2. EADS Astrium: YahSat 1A Perfect Communications merge (March). BC and 1B, Arabsat 5A, BADR-5 (the foregoing Partners to acquire Intelsat Ltd. for $16.4 billion, in cooperation with Thales Alenia Space) including debt (June). Carlyle Group to acquire and Alphasat 1-XL. Israel Aerospace ARINC (July). Apax Partners France Industries: Amos-4. Lockheed Martin purchases Telenor Satellite Services for $400 Commercial Space Systems: JCSAT-12. million (Sept.). Loral Space & Orbital Sciences Corporation: Optus-D3, Communications and PSP Canada conclude AMC-5R. Space Systems/Loral: Nimiq 5, C$3.25 billion acquisition of Telesat Canada ProtoStar I, Intelsat 14, SIRIUS FM-6, Abertis to acquire 28.4% stake in Hispasat EchoStar XIV, NSS-12. Thales Alenia (Nov.). CIP Canada Investment, indirectly Space: THOR 6, Palapa-D.
    [Show full text]
  • Realizing Resilient Tactical Networks with Maximum Government Control on High-Throughput Satellites
    WHITE PAPER Realizing Resilient Tactical Networks with Maximum Government Control on High-throughput Satellites 1 Wide-beam connectivity is an essential aspect of military satellite communications and High Throughput Satellite (HTS) technology is proving to be ideally suited for many Government applications. While most satellite operators offer closed HTS architectures that are vendor-locked with very little control offered to users, the Intelsat Epic Next Generation (Epic) HTS architecture is enterprise- grade, open architecture and vendor-agnostic. Intelsat Epic allows Government and military access to bandwidth-efficient, higher data throughputs on a global-scale via a wide variety of user-chosen waveforms, modems and antennas. Intelsat is proud to present the next generation of satellite communications that features higher data throughput rates and security while offering cost-efficiencies across the board. Introduction High Throughput Satellites (HTS) have been the center of solutions. Interoperability between the various military attention for the past five years. It is important to note that branches, allied, and coalition forces continues to be a most of these systems have been purpose-built solutions to challenge. Finally, most military and government users require service homogeneous sets of users via closed architectures. operational coverage in remote and austere regions such Systems such as ViaSat Exede, Inmarsat Global Express, Hughes as deserts, jungles, and oceans—well outside of population Jupiter, and Eutelsat KA-SAT require new investments in centers for which these closed architectures are optimized. proprietary modem technologies and service architectures. These closed systems offer star-only connectivity and keep With the disconnects between these closed HTS solutions and quality of service control with the service provider, not the end the challenges faced by the Government, it is no wonder that users.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts
    2010 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts May 2010 FAA Commercial Space Transportation (AST) and the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) HQ-101151.INDD 2010 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts About the Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA/AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 49 United States Code, Subtitle IX, Chapter 701 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA/AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA/AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA/AST’s web site at http://ast.faa.gov. Cover: Art by John Sloan (2010) NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. • i • Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation Table of Contents Executive Summary . 1 Introduction . 4 About the CoMStAC GSo Forecast . .4 About the FAA NGSo Forecast . .4 ChAracteriStics oF the CommerCiAl Space transportAtioN MArket . .5 Demand ForecastS . .5 COMSTAC 2010 Commercial Geosynchronous Orbit (GSO) Launch Demand Forecast . 7 exeCutive Summary . .7 BackGround . .9 Forecast MethoDoloGy . .9 CoMStAC CommerCiAl GSo Launch Demand Forecast reSultS .
    [Show full text]
  • Spectrum and the Technological Transformation of the Satellite Industry Prepared by Strand Consulting on Behalf of the Satellite Industry Association1
    Spectrum & the Technological Transformation of the Satellite Industry Spectrum and the Technological Transformation of the Satellite Industry Prepared by Strand Consulting on behalf of the Satellite Industry Association1 1 AT&T, a member of SIA, does not necessarily endorse all conclusions of this study. Page 1 of 75 Spectrum & the Technological Transformation of the Satellite Industry 1. Table of Contents 1. Table of Contents ................................................................................................ 1 2. Executive Summary ............................................................................................. 4 2.1. What the satellite industry does for the U.S. today ............................................... 4 2.2. What the satellite industry offers going forward ................................................... 4 2.3. Innovation in the satellite industry ........................................................................ 5 3. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 7 3.1. Overview .................................................................................................................. 7 3.2. Spectrum Basics ...................................................................................................... 8 3.3. Satellite Industry Segments .................................................................................... 9 3.3.1. Satellite Communications ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Update of the Space and Launch Insurance Industry
    Commercial Space Transportation QUARTERLY LAUNCH REPORT Special Report: Update of the Space and Launch Insurance Industry 4th Quarter 1998 United States Department of Transportation • Federal Aviation Administration Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation 800 Independence Ave. SW Room 331 Washington, D.C. 20591 Special Report SR-1 Update of the Space and Launch Insurance Industry INTRODUCTION at risk, insurance is essential to mitigate the high cost of a failure. Insurance is a basic requirement for the maintenance of a commercial space industry. Certain types of space insurance, such as Space activity mishaps can result in hundreds third party liability insurance, protect the of millions of dollars of expenses. Two general public from the hazards of space recent launch vehicles that failed (a Titan 4A activity. The U.S. Federal Aviation and the initial Delta 3) were valued at $1.3 Administration, through the Commercial billion and $225 million respectively Space Launch Act Amendments of 1988, (inclusive of payload). The replacement cost requires third party liability insurance as a of the recently failed Galaxy 4 satellite, for condition for the issuance of a commercial example, was in the range of $200 to $250 launch license. Under the 1972 United million. In addition, consequences of Nations Convention on International Liability mishaps will typically extend beyond the cost for Damage Caused by Space Objects, of a satellite and launch vehicle. Business governments are liable for injury or damage operations can be delayed, possibly resulting to third parties, caused by launch vehicles or in the deferral of a satellite venture’s vital payloads launched under their jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Plasma Conditions During the Galaxy 15 Anomaly and the Possibility of ESD from Subsurface Charging
    2011 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Plasma Conditions During the Galaxy 15 Anomaly and the Possibility of ESD from Subsurface Charging Journal: 2011 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Manuscript ID: Draft Conference: 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Date Submitted by the n/a Author: Contact Author: Ferguson, Dale http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/aiaa-masm11 Page 1 of 14 2011 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Plasma Conditions During the Galaxy 15 Anomaly and the Possibility of ESD from Subsurface Charging Dale C. Ferguson1 Air Force Research Laboratory, Space Vehicles Directorate, Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico 87117 William F. Denig NOAA National Geophysical Data Center, Boulder, Colorado 80305 and Juan V. Rodriguez University of Colorado Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, Colorado 80309 We review the fundamentals of spacecraft structure, surface and deep-dielectric charging and investigate the environmental conditions and possible spacecraft interactions at the time of the Galaxy 15 anomaly on April 5, 2010. GOES 14 measurements of 30-600 keV electron fluxes associated with an ongoing geomagnetic substorm showed extremely elevated electron temperatures and densities coincidentally peaking near the time when Galaxy 15 exited eclipse. NASCAP-2k is used to model absolute and differential charging effects on a generic satellite similar to Galaxy 15. Tables of electron and proton stopping power are used to calculate deep-dielectric charging from penetrating charged particles prior to the anomaly. Finally, we discuss the possibility that the Galaxy 15 anomaly may have been due to electrostatic discharge (ESD) as a result of surface and/or internal charging and recommend possible design considerations that might mitigate the occurrence of ESD on future spacecraft even under extreme environmental conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • De Satélites Geoestacionarios 2.3
    "2015 - )!.ño áe{ (]3icentf!}}ario áe{ klJ!loreso áeIos PueMos £i6res" ".. 1. CA~":i'J"'.AD2DIPUTADOS : 0:= L ,\ h!AC.!Ói~ MESA I)E ENTRADA : i 1 3 y ""1(é ork/; l i, !-,.q,J j I~ ""I">"C' r!O /11 IJonA/6l1í I ~I:.S ,~.f. 1 rvr..~........ CD=153/15 Buenos Aires, 7 de octubre de 2015. Al señor Presidente de la Honorable Cámara de Diputados de la Nación. Tengo el honor de dirigirme al señor Presidente, a fin de comunicarle que el Honorable Senado, en la fecha, ha sancionado el siguiente proyecto de ley que paso en revisión a esa Honorable Cámara: "EL SENADO Y CAMARA DE DIPUTADOS, etc. LEY DE DESARROLLO DE LA INDUSTRIA SATELITAL TÍTULO I DE LOS SATÉLITES GEOSTACIONARIOS DE TELECOMUNICACIONES CAPÍTULO I DE LA INDUSTRIA SATELITAL Artículo 1º- Declárase de interés nacional el desarrollo de la ~ndustria satelital como política de Estado y de prioridad nacional, en .10 que respecta a satélites geoestacionarios de telecomunicaciones. CAPITULO II DEL PLAN SATELITAL GEOESTACIONARIO ARGENTINO 2015-2035 Art. 2º~ Apruébase ~l 'Plan Satelital 6eoestacionario Argentino 2015-2035', que como Anexo I forma parte integrante de la presente ley. Art. 3º- Declárase .de interés público nacional el 'Plan Satelital Geoestacionario Argentino 2015-2035', aprobado mediante el artículo 2º de la presente ley. Art. 4º- El Poder Ejecutivo nacional, por intermedio de la Empresa Argentina de Soluciones Satelitales Sociedad Anónima x I "2015 - ;J.ño de{ (]3icentenario de{ Congreso de ÚJs!Pue6ÚJs£i6res" '2 CD=153/15 AR-SAT, ejecutará las acciones necesarias a fin de implementar el 'Plan Satelital Geoestacionario Argentino 2015-2035'.
    [Show full text]
  • 59864 Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 185/Wednesday, September 23
    59864 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 185 / Wednesday, September 23, 2020 / Rules and Regulations FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS C. Congressional Review Act II. Report and Order COMMISSION 2. The Commission has determined, A. Allocating FTEs 47 CFR Part 1 and the Administrator of the Office of 5. In the FY 2020 NPRM, the Information and Regulatory Affairs, Commission proposed that non-auctions [MD Docket No. 20–105; FCC 20–120; FRS Office of Management and Budget, funded FTEs will be classified as direct 17050] concurs that these rules are non-major only if in one of the four core bureaus, under the Congressional Review Act, 5 i.e., in the Wireline Competition Assessment and Collection of U.S.C. 804(2). The Commission will Bureau, the Wireless Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2020 send a copy of this Report & Order to Telecommunications Bureau, the Media Congress and the Government Bureau, or the International Bureau. The AGENCY: Federal Communications indirect FTEs are from the following Commission. Accountability Office pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). bureaus and offices: Enforcement ACTION: Final rule. Bureau, Consumer and Governmental 3. In this Report and Order, we adopt Affairs Bureau, Public Safety and SUMMARY: In this document, the a schedule to collect the $339,000,000 Homeland Security Bureau, Chairman Commission revises its Schedule of in congressionally required regulatory and Commissioners’ offices, Office of Regulatory Fees to recover an amount of fees for fiscal year (FY) 2020. The the Managing Director, Office of General $339,000,000 that Congress has required regulatory fees for all payors are due in Counsel, Office of the Inspector General, the Commission to collect for fiscal year September 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Fidelity® International Sustainability Index Fund
    Fidelity® International Sustainability Index Fund Annual Report October 31, 2020 See the inside front cover for important information about access to your fund’s shareholder reports. Beginning on January 1, 2021, as permitted by regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, paper copies of a fund’s shareholder reports will no longer be sent by mail, unless you specifically request paper copies of the reports from the fund or from your financial intermediary, such as a financial advisor, broker-dealer or bank. Instead, the reports will be made available on a website, and you will be notified by mail each time a report is posted and provided with a website link to access the report. If you already elected to receive shareholder reports electronically, you will not be affected by this change and you need not take any action. You may elect to receive shareholder reports and other communications from a fund electronically, by contacting your financial intermediary. For Fidelity customers, visit Fidelity’s web site or call Fidelity using the contact information listed below. You may elect to receive all future reports in paper free of charge. If you wish to continue receiving paper copies of your shareholder reports, you may contact your financial intermediary or, if you are a Fidelity customer, visit Fidelity’s website, or call Fidelity at the applicable toll-free number listed below. Your election to receive reports in paper will apply to all funds held with the fund complex/your financial intermediary. Account Type Website
    [Show full text]
  • Fl.2020.12.18 Spectrum Five Reply
    Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Spectrum Five LLC ) IB Docket No. 20-399 ) Petition for Enforcement of Operational ) Limits and for Expedited Proceedings ) To Revoke Satellite Licenses ) REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PETITION OF SPECTRUM FIVE LLC Francisco R. Montero Fletcher Heald & Hildreth, PLC 1300 North 17th St. 11th Fl. Arlington, VA 22209 (703) 812-0400 [email protected] December 18, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 1 ARGUMENT .................................................................................................................................. 4 I. Intelsat’s Willful Violations of the Intelsat 30 and 31 Licenses and Commission Regulations Warrant License Revocation ........................................................................... 4 A. The Commission and ITU Licensing Regimes Are Not “Independent” Silos; Commission Regulations and Practices Enforce and Effectuate ITU Rules .............................................................................................. 5 B. Intelsat Never Properly Secured ITU Rights Reflecting Intelsat 30 and 31’s Operations on Ku-Extended Band .......................................... 7 C. Intelsat Never Properly Secured ITU Rights Reflecting Intelsat 30 and 31’s Satellite Uplink Antenna Gain and Power Levels ................ 17 II. Intelsat’s Repeated Misrepresentations to the Commission and Other Regulators Warrant Revoking
    [Show full text]
  • A B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
    A B 1 Name of Satellite, Alternate Names Country of Operator/Owner 2 AcrimSat (Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitor) USA 3 Afristar USA 4 Agila 2 (Mabuhay 1) Philippines 5 Akebono (EXOS-D) Japan 6 ALOS (Advanced Land Observing Satellite; Daichi) Japan 7 Alsat-1 Algeria 8 Amazonas Brazil 9 AMC-1 (Americom 1, GE-1) USA 10 AMC-10 (Americom-10, GE 10) USA 11 AMC-11 (Americom-11, GE 11) USA 12 AMC-12 (Americom 12, Worldsat 2) USA 13 AMC-15 (Americom-15) USA 14 AMC-16 (Americom-16) USA 15 AMC-18 (Americom 18) USA 16 AMC-2 (Americom 2, GE-2) USA 17 AMC-23 (Worldsat 3) USA 18 AMC-3 (Americom 3, GE-3) USA 19 AMC-4 (Americom-4, GE-4) USA 20 AMC-5 (Americom-5, GE-5) USA 21 AMC-6 (Americom-6, GE-6) USA 22 AMC-7 (Americom-7, GE-7) USA 23 AMC-8 (Americom-8, GE-8, Aurora 3) USA 24 AMC-9 (Americom 9) USA 25 Amos 1 Israel 26 Amos 2 Israel 27 Amsat-Echo (Oscar 51, AO-51) USA 28 Amsat-Oscar 7 (AO-7) USA 29 Anik F1 Canada 30 Anik F1R Canada 31 Anik F2 Canada 32 Apstar 1 China (PR) 33 Apstar 1A (Apstar 3) China (PR) 34 Apstar 2R (Telstar 10) China (PR) 35 Apstar 6 China (PR) C D 1 Operator/Owner Users 2 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Government 3 WorldSpace Corp. Commercial 4 Mabuhay Philippines Satellite Corp. Commercial 5 Institute of Space and Aeronautical Science, University of Tokyo Civilian Research 6 Earth Observation Research and Application Center/JAXA Japan 7 Centre National des Techniques Spatiales (CNTS) Government 8 Hispamar (subsidiary of Hispasat - Spain) Commercial 9 SES Americom (SES Global) Commercial
    [Show full text]