DOCSLIB.ORG

Fauna Aquatica Austriaca

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fauna Aquatica Austriaca FAUNA AQUATICA AUSTRIACA Katalog zur autökologischen Einstufung aquatischer Organismen Österreichs 2. Lieferung - 2002 FAUNA AQUATICA AUSTRIACA Katalog zur autökologischen Einstufung aquatischer Organismen Österreichs 2. Lieferung - 2002 Editor Otto Moog BOKU - Universität für Bodenkultur Institut für Hydrobiologie und Gewässermanagement Auftraggeber Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft Wasserwirtschaftskataster 2. Lieferung, 2002 Erstellt im Auftrag des Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft vom Institut für Hydrobiologie und Gewässermanagement der Universität für Bodenkultur Projektleitung: Univ. Prof. Dr. Otto Moog Max Emanuel Straße 17 A-1180 Wien Der Katalog wird in loser Folge ergänzt. Die Ergänzungslieferungen werden in steigender Reihenfolge nummeriert ausgeliefert und erlauben anhand der Sortier- hinweise eine problemlose Aktualisierung des Kataloges. Zitierhinweise: Zitieren des gesamten Katalogs: MOOG, O. (Ed.) (2002): Fauna Aquatica Austriaca, Lieferung 2002.- Wasserwirtschaftskataster, Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft, Wien. Zitieren einzelner Organismengruppen: Autor(en) der Organismengruppe (Jahreszahl): Organismengruppe.- Teil (römische Ziffer), Ziffer der Summe aller Seiten pp., in MOOG, O. (Ed.) (2002): Fauna Aquatica Austriaca, Lieferung 2002.- Wasserwirtschaftskataster, Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft, Wien. Impressum: Medieninhaber und Herausgeber: Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft, Stubenring 1, 1010 Wien ISBN: 3-85 174-044-0 FAUNA AQUATICA AUSTRIACA Katalog zur autökologischen Einstufung aquatischer Organismen Österreichs OTTO MOOG (ED.) 2. LIEFERUNG - 2002 TEIL I - VORWORTE, AUTORENVERZEICHNIS UND EINLEITUNGEN TEIL II - PROTOZOA, CILIOPHORA (ARTENINVENTAR, SAPROBIELLE VALENZEN, EUSAPROBITÄT, ÖKOLOGISCHE CHARAKTERISIERUNG) TEIL III - METAZOA (ARTENINVENTAR, SAPROBIELLE VALENZEN, LÄNGENZONALE VERTEILUNG NACH BIOZÖNOTISCHEN REGIONEN, ERNÄHRUNGSTYPEN AUF ARTNIVEAU) TEIL IV - ERNÄHRUNGSTYPEN - FAMILIEN/GATTUNGSNIVEAU FAUNA AQUATICA AUSTRIACA Katalog zur autökologischen Einstufung aquatischer Organismen Österreichs TEIL I - VORWORTE, AUTORENVERZEICHNIS UND EINLEITUNGEN Einleitung 1 INHALTSVERZEICHNIS Vorwort zur 1. Lieferung ..............................................................................................2 Vorwort zur 2. Lieferung ..............................................................................................3 Verzeichnis der Tiergruppen und Autoren ...................................................................4 Adressenverzeichnis der Autoren................................................................................6 Alphabetische Aufstellung aller Autoren und Mitarbeiter ...........................................10 Einleitung und Erläuterungen zur 2. Lieferung...........................................................12 Einleitung zur 1. Lieferung, methodische Grundlagen und Anwendungsbeispiele zum Gebrauch des Kataloges................................................28 2 Einleitung Vorwort zur 1. Lieferung Biologische Gewässergüteuntersuchungen haben in Österreich bereits eine lange Tradition. 1968 wurde vom Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft das erste „Biologische Gütebild“, eine flächendeckende, überblicksmäßige Darstellung über die saprobiologische Einstufung österreichischer Fliessgewässer, veröffentlicht. Die landesweite einheitliche Untersuchung von Fliessgewässern wurde 1990 in der Wassergüte-Erhebungsverordnung zum Hydrographiegesetz gesetzlich geregelt. Im Rahmen dieser Verordnung wird neben der physikalisch-chemischen Wasserqualität einmal pro Jahr auch die sapro-/biologische Gewässergüte österreichischer Fliessgewässer an 244 Messstellen untersucht. Neben der Notwendigkeit, die traditionelle saprobiologische Güteauswertung zu aktualiserien, hat sich aber auch gezeigt, dass bei den vielfältigen Möglichkeiten von Gewässerbeeinträchtigungen diese Methode allein nicht mehr ausreicht, den tatsächlichen Zustand der Gewässer aus biologischer Sicht zu beschreiben. Die Forderung nach der Entwicklung neuer, ökosystembezogener Analysen- bzw. Bewertungsmethoden gewann durch die Tatsache, dass in der Wasserrechtsgesetz-Novelle 1985 bzw. 1990 die Erhaltung der ökologischen Funktionsfähigkeit als maßgebliches Ziel des Gwässerschutzes gesetzlich verankert wurde, zusätzlich an Bedeutung und Dringlichkeit. Aus diesem Grund stellt die vorliegende Arbeit mit der Erstellung eines auf österreichische Verhältnisse abgestimmten Saprobienkataloges sowie der erstmaligen Übersicht über die heimische Limnofauna nicht nur einen Meilenstein für die biologische Gütebeurteilung österreichischer Fliessgewässer dar. Mit Entwicklung einer systemisierten Bewertung der Gewässerbiozönose im Hinblick auf funktionelle Ernährungstypen und längenzonale Verteilung nach biozönotischen Regionen ist es den Autoren gelungen, eine wesentliche Grundlage für die Beurteilung der ökologischen Funktionsfähigkeit der Fliessgewässer zu schaffen, die in ihrer Bedeutung auch über die Landesgrenzen hinaus wirken wird. Dem Projektleiter und seinen MitarbeiterInnen darf an dieser Stelle für die sorgfältige und umfassende Bearbeitung sowie ihr enormes Engagement besonders gedankt werden. Wien, im Mai 1995 Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft Wasserwirtschaftskataster _____________________________________________ Fauna Aquatica Austriaca - Lieferung 2002 Einleitung 3 Vorwort zur 2. Lieferung Die Gewährleistung einer einheitlichen Datengrundlage bildet die grundlegende Voraussetzung für die Vergleichbarkeit von Untersuchungsergebnissen und für qualitätssichernde Maßnahmen im Rahmen des nationalen Gütemonitorings von Fließgewässern. Ein wichtiger Bestandteil dieser Standardisierung ist die Vereinheitlichung der ökologischen, insbesondere der saprobiellen Einstufungen für Makrozoobenthos. Mit dem, im Auftrag des BMLFUW erstellten Einstufungskatalogs benthischer Evertebraten (Fauna Aquatica Austriaca, MOOG (Ed.) 1995) wurde ein Katalog mit dem Anspruch österreichweiter Gültigkeit erstellt. Dieser wurde nun überarbeitet und durch zusätzliche Organismengruppen ergänzt. Die aktualisierte und ergänzte Version der Fauna Aquatica Austriaca stellt auch eine wesentliche Grundlage für die Umsetzung der EU-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie dar. Den Bearbeitern und Autoren darf der beste Dank für ihre Bemühungen und ihr Engagement ausgesprochen werden. Wien, Dezember 2002 Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft – Wasserwirtschaftskataster _____________________________________________ Fauna Aquatica Austriaca - Lieferung 2002 4 Einleitung VERZEICHNIS DER TIERGRUPPEN UND AUTOREN TIERGRUPPE AUTOREN GESAMTSEITENZAHLEN TEIL II PROTOZOA: CILIOPHORA ............................................ FOISSNER, BERGER, BLATTERER & KOHMANN............................................45 TEIL III METAZOA: KAMPTOZOA (ENTOPROCTA) .................... SPORKA ................................................5 MOLLUSCA GASTROPODA ..................................... NESEMANN & REISCHÜTZ .....................19 BIVALVIA............................................. NESEMANN & REISCHÜTZ .....................10 POLYCHAETA .......................................... HÖRNER, MOOG & SPORKA ....................5 OLIGOCHAETA ......................................... HÖRNER, MOOG & SPORKA ..................18 HIRUDINEA .............................................. NESEMANN & MOOG ..............................9 CLITELLATA: BRANCHIOBDELLIDA.............. NESEMANN ............................................5 CRUSTACEA ANOSTRACA, NOTOSTRACA, CONCHOSTRACA ........... HÖDL & EDER........................................7 COPEPODA CALANOIDA..................................... GAVIRIA, HERZIG & FORRÓ.....................3 CYCLOPOIDA .................................. GAVIRIA, HERZIG, POSPISIL & FORRÓ .....6 HARPACTICOIDA.............................. GAVIRIA, KOWARC & FUCHS ...................5 PARASITICA..................................... KONECNY ..............................................2 MYSIDACEA ........................................ WITTMANN.............................................5 AMPHIPODA, ISOPODA, DECAPODA ......................................... NESEMANN, MOOG & PÖCKL ..................8 ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE............................. THALER .................................................7 EPHEMEROPTERA.................................... BAUERNFEIND, MOOG & WEICHSELBAUMER ...............................24 ODONATA ............................................... JANECEK, MOOG & WARINGER .............14 PLECOPTERA .......................................... GRAF, GRASSER & WEINZIERL..............17 HETEROPTERA ........................................ ZETTEL................................................11 MEGALOPTERA........................................ ASPÖCK. ...............................................4 NEUROPTERA: OSMYLIDAE....................... ASPÖCK. ...............................................2 NEUROPTERA: SISYRIDAE ........................ WEISSMAIR & WARINGER .......................5 AUCHENORRHYNCHA: CICADELLIDAE ........ HOLZINGER............................................5 ORTHOPTERA.......................................... BERG & BIERINGER ................................5 _____________________________________________ Fauna Aquatica Austriaca - Lieferung 2002
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Diptera: Chironomidae), with The
    Zootaxa 2497: 1–36 (2010) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2010 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) The problems with Polypedilum Kieffer (Diptera: Chironomidae), with the description of Probolum subgen. n. OLE A. SÆTHER1, TROND ANDERSEN2,5, LUIZ C. PINHO3 & HUMBERTO F. MENDES4 1, 2 & 4Department of Natural History, Bergen Museum, University of Bergen, Pb. 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway. 3Departamento de Biologia, FFCLRP-USP, Avenida Bandeirantes, n. 3900, CEP 14040-901, Ribeirão Preto - SP, Brazil. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 5Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Table of contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Material and methods .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Systematics .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Polypedilum subgenus Tripedilum Kieffer .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Beetles
    Ireland Red List No. 1 Water beetles Ireland Red List No. 1: Water beetles G.N. Foster1, B.H. Nelson2 & Á. O Connor3 1 3 Eglinton Terrace, Ayr KA7 1JJ 2 Department of Natural Sciences, National Museums Northern Ireland 3 National Parks & Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage & Local Government Citation: Foster, G. N., Nelson, B. H. & O Connor, Á. (2009) Ireland Red List No. 1 – Water beetles. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover images from top: Dryops similaris (© Roy Anderson); Gyrinus urinator, Hygrotus decoratus, Berosus signaticollis & Platambus maculatus (all © Jonty Denton) Ireland Red List Series Editors: N. Kingston & F. Marnell © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2009 ISSN 2009‐2016 Red list of Irish Water beetles 2009 ____________________________ CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................ 3 NOMENCLATURE AND THE IRISH CHECKLIST................................................................................................ 3 COVERAGE .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Freshwater Snails (Gastropoda) of Iran, with Descriptions of Two New Genera and Eight New Species
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 219: The11–61 freshwater (2012) snails (Gastropoda) of Iran, with descriptions of two new genera... 11 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.219.3406 RESEARCH articLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research The freshwater snails (Gastropoda) of Iran, with descriptions of two new genera and eight new species Peter Glöer1,†, Vladimir Pešić2,‡ 1 Biodiversity Research Laboratory, Schulstraße 3, D-25491 Hetlingen, Germany 2 Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Montenegro, Cetinjski put b.b., 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro † urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:8CB6BA7C-D04E-4586-BA1D-72FAFF54C4C9 ‡ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:719843C2-B25C-4F8B-A063-946F53CB6327 Corresponding author: Vladimir Pešić ([email protected]) Academic editor: Eike Neubert | Received 18 May 2012 | Accepted 24 August 2012 | Published 4 September 2012 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:35A0EBEF-8157-40B5-BE49-9DBD7B273918 Citation: Glöer P, Pešić V (2012) The freshwater snails (Gastropoda) of Iran, with descriptions of two new genera and eight new species. ZooKeys 219: 11–61. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.219.3406 Abstract Using published records and original data from recent field work and revision of Iranian material of cer- tain species deposited in the collections of the Natural History Museum Basel, the Zoological Museum Berlin, and Natural History Museum Vienna, a checklist of the freshwater gastropod fauna of Iran was compiled. This checklist contains 73 species from 34 genera and 14 families of freshwater snails; 27 of these species (37%) are endemic to Iran. Two new genera, Kaskakia and Sarkhia, and eight species, i.e., Bithynia forcarti, B. starmuehlneri, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Chironominae 8.1
    CHIRONOMINAE 8.1 SUBFAMILY CHIRONOMINAE 8 DIAGNOSIS: Antennae 4-8 segmented, rarely reduced. Labrum with S I simple, palmate or plumose; S II simple, apically fringed or plumose; S III simple; S IV normal or sometimes on pedicel. Labral lamellae usually well developed, but reduced or absent in some taxa. Mentum usually with 8-16 well sclerotized teeth; sometimes central teeth or entire mentum pale or poorly sclerotized; rarely teeth fewer than 8 or modified as seta-like projections. Ventromental plates well developed and usually striate, but striae reduced or vestigial in some taxa; beard absent. Prementum without dense brushes of setae. Body usually with anterior and posterior parapods and procerci well developed; setal fringe not present, but sometimes with bifurcate pectinate setae. Penultimate segment sometimes with 1-2 pairs of ventral tubules; antepenultimate segment sometimes with lateral tubules. Anal tubules usually present, reduced in brackish water and marine taxa. NOTESTES: Usually the most abundant subfamily (in terms of individuals and taxa) found on the Coastal Plain of the Southeast. Found in fresh, brackish and salt water (at least one truly marine genus). Most larvae build silken tubes in or on substrate; some mine in plants, dead wood or sediments; some are free- living; some build transportable cases. Many larvae feed by spinning silk catch-nets, allowing them to fill with detritus, etc., and then ingesting the net; some taxa are grazers; some are predacious. Larvae of several taxa (especially Chironomus) have haemoglobin that gives them a red color and the ability to live in low oxygen conditions. With only one exception (Skutzia), at the generic level the larvae of all described (as adults) southeastern Chironominae are known.
    [Show full text]
  • Dytiscid Water Beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) of the Yukon
    Dytiscid water beetles of the Yukon FRONTISPIECE. Neoscutopterus horni (Crotch), a large, black species of dytiscid beetle that is common in sphagnum bog pools throughout the Yukon Territory. 491 Dytiscid Water Beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) of the Yukon DAVID J. LARSON Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada A1B 3X9 Abstract. One hundred and thirteen species of Dytiscidae (Coleoptera) are recorded from the Yukon Territory. The Yukon distribution, total geographical range and habitat of each of these species is described and multi-species patterns are summarized in tabular form. Several different range patterns are recognized with most species being Holarctic or transcontinental Nearctic boreal (73%) in lentic habitats. Other major range patterns are Arctic (20 species) and Cordilleran (12 species), while a few species are considered to have Grassland (7), Deciduous forest (2) or Southern (5) distributions. Sixteen species have a Beringian and glaciated western Nearctic distribution, i.e. the only Nearctic Wisconsinan refugial area encompassed by their present range is the Alaskan/Central Yukon refugium; 5 of these species are closely confined to this area while 11 have wide ranges that extend in the arctic and/or boreal zones east to Hudson Bay. Résumé. Les dytiques (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) du Yukon. Cent treize espèces de dytiques (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) sont connues au Yukon. Leur répartition au Yukon, leur répartition globale et leur habitat sont décrits et un tableau résume les regroupements d’espèces. La répartition permet de reconnaître plusieurs éléments: la majorité des espèces sont holarctiques ou transcontinentales-néarctiques-boréales (73%) dans des habitats lénitiques. Vingt espèces sont arctiques, 12 sont cordillériennes, alors qu’un petit nombre sont de la prairie herbeuse (7), ou de la forêt décidue (2), ou sont australes (5).
    [Show full text]
  • Crossness Sewage Treatment Works Nature Reserve & Southern Marsh Aquatic Invertebrate Survey
    Commissioned by Thames Water Utilities Limited Clearwater Court Vastern Road Reading RG1 8DB CROSSNESS SEWAGE TREATMENT WORKS NATURE RESERVE & SOUTHERN MARSH AQUATIC INVERTEBRATE SURVEY Report number: CPA18054 JULY 2019 Prepared by Colin Plant Associates (UK) Consultant Entomologists 30a Alexandra Rd London N8 0PP 1 1 INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY 1.1 Introduction and background 1.1.1 On 30th May 2018 Colin Plant Associates (UK) were commissioned by Biodiversity Team Manager, Karen Sutton on behalf of Thames Water Utilities Ltd. to undertake aquatic invertebrate sampling at Crossness Sewage Treatment Works on Erith Marshes, Kent. This survey was to mirror the locations and methodology of a previous survey undertaken during autumn 2016 and spring 2017. Colin Plant Associates also undertook the aquatic invertebrate sampling of this previous survey. 1.1.2 The 2016-17 aquatic survey was commissioned with the primary objective of establishing a baseline aquatic invertebrate species inventory and to determine the quality of the aquatic habitats present across both the Nature Reserve and Southern Marsh areas of the Crossness Sewage Treatment Works. The surveyors were asked to sample at twenty-four, pre-selected sample station locations, twelve in each area. Aquatic Coleoptera and Heteroptera (beetles and true bugs) were selected as target groups. A report of the previous survey was submitted in Sept 2017 (Plant 2017). 1.1.3 During December 2017 a large-scale pollution event took place and untreated sewage escaped into a section of the Crossness Nature Reserve. The primary point of egress was Nature Reserve Sample Station 1 (NR1) though because of the connectivity of much of the waterbody network on the marsh other areas were affected.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments on Some Species in Tribe Chironomini
    Comments on some species in tribe Chironomini Henk Vallenduuk Prof. Gerbrandystraat 10, 5463BK Veghel, Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] During the work of identifying Chironomini collected at various localities in the Netherlands, I made some observations in species interpretation that I think are useful to share with the readers of the Chironomus Newsletter on Chironomidae Research. I hope that in particular ecologists and other users of larval identi- fication keys will find the below comments helpful. Reinterpretation of some species in Chironomus Chironomus macani I obtained males and females from single-reared larvae. Peter Langton identified them as Chironomus (Chaetolabis) macani Freeman, 1948 and confirmed that the male imagines are conspecific with the holo- type of Chironomus (Chaetolabis) macani, held in the Natural History Museum in London, but not with those of Prof. Wolfgang Wülker presently kept in the Zoologische Staatssammlung, München. The Wül- ker’s specimens thus do not belong to the true C. macani and should be renamed (Langton & Vallenduuk 2013). The larvae of both species are morphologically very similar but can be differentiated. Chironomus dorsalis Chironomus (Lobochironomus) longipes Staeger, 1839 was listed as a junior synonym of Chironomus (Lo- bochironomus) dorsalis Meigen, 1818 by Spies & Sæther (2004). However, the name Chironomus (Chi- ronomus) dorsalis Meigen, 1818 has also been used (e.g. Strenzke 1959). Chironomus dorsalis Meigen sensu Strenzke is a misidentification and synonymous withC. alpestris Goetghebuer, 1934 (Sæther & Spies 2013). I reared single larvae of C. dorsalis Meigen and C. alpestris Goetghebuer. It appears that the imago of C. longipes described by Shilova (1980) as Einfeldia does not match with C.
    [Show full text]
  • Beetles from Sălaj County, Romania (Coleoptera, Excluding Carabidae)
    Studia Universitatis “Vasile Goldiş”, Seria Ştiinţele Vieţii Vol. 26 supplement 1, 2016, pp.5- 58 © 2016 Vasile Goldis University Press (www.studiauniversitatis.ro) BEETLES FROM SĂLAJ COUNTY, ROMANIA (COLEOPTERA, EXCLUDING CARABIDAE) Ottó Merkl, Tamás Németh, Attila Podlussány Department of Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum ABSTRACT: During a faunistical exploration of Sǎlaj county carried out in 2014 and 2015, 840 beetle species were recorded, including two species of Community interest (Natura 2000 species): Cucujus cinnaberinus (Scopoli, 1763) and Lucanus cervus Linnaeus, 1758. Notes on the distribution of Augyles marmota (Kiesenwetter, 1850) (Heteroceridae), Trichodes punctatus Fischer von Waldheim, 1829 (Cleridae), Laena reitteri Weise, 1877 (Tenebrionidae), Brachysomus ornatus Stierlin, 1892, Lixus cylindrus (Fabricius, 1781) (Curculionidae), Mylacomorphus globus (Seidlitz, 1868) (Curculionidae) are given. Key words: Coleoptera, beetles, Sǎlaj, Romania, Transsylvania, faunistics INTRODUCTION: László Dányi, LF = László Forró, LR = László The beetle fauna of Sǎlaj county is relatively little Ronkay, MT = Mária Tóth, OM = Ottó Merkl, PS = known compared to that of Romania, and even to other Péter Sulyán, VS = Viktória Szőke, ZB = Zsolt Bálint, parts of Transsylvania. Zilahi Kiss (1905) listed ZE = Zoltán Erőss, ZS = Zoltán Soltész, ZV = Zoltán altogether 2,214 data of 1,373 species of 537 genera Vas). The serial numbers in parentheses refer to the list from Sǎlaj county mainly based on his own collections of collecting sites published in this volume by A. and partially on those of Kuthy (1897). Some of his Gubányi. collection sites (e.g. Tasnád or Hadad) no longer The collected specimens were identified by belong to Sǎlaj county. numerous coleopterists. Their names are given under Vasile Goldiş Western University (Arad) and the the names of beetle families.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide for the Identification of Two Subfamilies of Larval Chironomidae
    Envlronment Canada Environnement Canada Fisheries Service des pêches .1 and Marine Service et des sciences de la mer L .' 1 '; ( 1 l r A Guide for the Identification of Two Subfamil ies of Larval Chironomidae: ,1"'--- The Chironominae and Tanypodlnae . : - - . ) / Found .in Benthic Studies Jin the / r~---.-_ c L___ r - - '" - .Ç"'''''-. Winnipeg River in the Vicinity ot Pine Falls, Manitoba in 1971 and 1972 by P. L. Stewart J.S. Loch Technical Report Series No. CEN/T-73-12 Resource Management Branch Central Region DEPARTMÈNT OF THE ENViRONMENT FISHERIES AND MARINE SERViCE Fisheries Operations Directorate Central Region Technical Reports Series No. CEN/T-73-12 A guide for the identification of two subfami lies of larva l Chironomidae~ the Chironominae and Tanypodinae found in benthic studies in the Winnipeg Riv~r in the vicinity of Pine Falls, Manitoba, in 1971 and 1972. by: P.L. Stewart qnd J.S. Loch ERRATA Page13: The caption for Figure 5A should read: Mentum and ventromental plates..•... instead of: submentum and ventromental plates..•.. Page 14: The caption for Figure 5B should read: Mentum and ventromental plates . instead of: submentum and ventromental plates.... DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT FISHERIES AND MARINE SERVICE Fisheries Operations Directorate Central Region Technical Report Series No: CEN/T-73-12 A GUIDE FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF IWO SUBF.AMILIES OF LARVM.... CHIRONOMIDAE: THE CHIRONOMINAE AND TANYPODINAE FOUND IN BENTHIC STUDIES IN THE WINNIPEG RIVER IN THE vrCINITY OF PINE FM....LS, MANITOBA IN 1971 and 1972 by P. L. Stewart and J. S. Loch Resource Management Branch Fisheries Operations Directorate Central Region, Winnipeg November 1973 i ABSTRACT Identifying characteristics of the genera of two subfamilies of larvae of the midge family, C~onomldae (Vlpt~a), the C~ono­ mlnae and the Tanypodlnae, are presented with illustrations for the purpose of simplifying identification of these two groups by novice and more experienced personnel involved in assessment of benthic faunal composition.
    [Show full text]
  • Bijdragen Tot De Dierkunde, 46 (2) - 1977
    Site selection and growth of the larvae ofEylais discreta Koenike, 1897 (Acari, Hydrachnellae) by C. Davids G.J. Nielsen & P. Gehring Zoological Laboratory, University ofAmsterdam, The Netherlands Abstract Such differences in growth rate are known for Arrenurus papillator (O. F. Müller, 1776). The The distribution of the larvae of Eylais discreta on the larvae of this species have a larger size on the abdominal tergites of the host species Sigara striata, S. falleni subcosta than the anal veins of of on the wings and Cymatia coleoptrata is examined. dragonflies (Münchberg, 1963). The same holds On S. striata and S. falleni the segments 3 and 4, on C. true larvae of are for the Limnochares aquatica coleoptrata the segments 2 and 3 successively preferred. There is but little influence of multiple infestations on this (Linnaeus, 1758) attached on the prothorax of distribution. with those Gerridae, compared on the meso- and The growth rate on the various tergites of S. striata is metathorax (Pahnke, 1974). similar, while on C. coleoptrata a possible difference could not When studying these phenomena, one has to be proved statistically. The larvae of E. discreta generally study the first. hibernate on the host; during this phase there is little growth; growth not until March-April they start growing faster. The larvae on C. coleoptrataare retarded in growth compared to those on S. METHODS AND RESULTS striata. The show in larvae on S. falleni do not any increase size; this water is immune to infestation various bug species by Host insects were collected by dip net on several Hydrachnellae.
    [Show full text]
  • Scope: Munis Entomology & Zoology Publishes a Wide Variety of Papers
    _____________ Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 4, No. 1, January 2009___________ I MUNIS ENTOMOLOGY & ZOOLOGY Ankara / Turkey II _____________ Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 4, No. 1, January 2009___________ Scope: Munis Entomology & Zoology publishes a wide variety of papers on all aspects of Entomology and Zoology from all of the world, including mainly studies on systematics, taxonomy, nomenclature, fauna, biogeography, biodiversity, ecology, morphology, behavior, conservation, paleobiology and other aspects are appropriate topics for papers submitted to Munis Entomology & Zoology. Submission of Manuscripts: Works published or under consideration elsewhere (including on the internet) will not be accepted. At first submission, one double spaced hard copy (text and tables) with figures (may not be original) must be sent to the Editors, Dr. Hüseyin Özdikmen for publication in MEZ. All manuscripts should be submitted as Word file or PDF file in an e-mail attachment. If electronic submission is not possible due to limitations of electronic space at the sending or receiving ends, unavailability of e-mail, etc., we will accept “hard” versions, in triplicate, accompanied by an electronic version stored in a floppy disk, a CD-ROM. Review Process: When submitting manuscripts, all authors provides the name, of at least three qualified experts (they also provide their address, subject fields and e-mails). Then, the editors send to experts to review the papers. The review process should normally be completed within 45-60 days. After reviewing papers by reviwers: Rejected papers are discarded. For accepted papers, authors are asked to modify their papers according to suggestions of the reviewers and editors. Final versions of manuscripts and figures are needed in a digital format.
    [Show full text]
  • 319 Konference “15 Let Národního Parku Podyjí
    THAYENSIA (ZNOJMO) 2007, 7: 319–332. ISSN 1212-3560 KONFERENCE “15 LET NÁRODNÍHO PARKU PODYJÍ – VÝZKUM A OCHRANA”, ZNOJMO, 1.–3. LISTOPADU 2006: ABSTRAKTA PREZENTACÍ, KTERÉ NEJSOU ZAHRNUTY V TOMTO SBORNÍKU FORMOU ČLÁNKU CONFERENCE “15 YEARS OF THE PODYJÍ NATIONAL PARK – RESEARCH AND PROTECTION”, ZNOJMO, NOVEMBER 1–3, 2006: ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS ISSUE DIPTERA OF THE PODYJÍ NATIONAL PARK AND ITS ENVIRONS Miroslav B a r t á k Czech University of Agriculture, Department of Zoology and Fisheries, CZ–165 21 Praha 6, Czech Republic The area of the Podyjí NP and its close environs were thoroughly investigated in 2001–2004 in order to learn more information about the Diptera fauna. Altogether, 3,606 species were identi- fi ed. In the fi nal monograph resulting from our research (BARTÁK M., KUBÍK Š. (eds.) 2005: Diptera of Podyjí National Park and its Environs. – ČZU Praha, 432 pp.) we reported 137 records of new species in the Czech Republic and another 155 in Moravia. The most striking feature of the Podyjí NP’s Diptera fauna is the surprisingly frequent occurrence of species with clear affi nity to mounta- inous habitats. A relatively large number of the species collected in the Podyjí NP were obviously obtained due to the effi cient collecting methods used (Malaise traps, white and yellow pan water traps, emergence traps, sweeping, car nets, etc.). The Podyjí NP proved to be very important for nature conservation, altogether 252 species included in the recent regional Red list were found (= 26.1% of all Czech species included) and several species discovered for the fi rst time in the Czech Republic by the present investigations in this area were proposed in addition to this list.
    [Show full text]