DOCSLIB.ORG

Phylogenetic Relationships of the Earliest Anisostrophically Coiled Gastropods

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEOBIOLOGY • NUMBER 8 Phylogenetic Relationships of the Earliest Anisostrophically Coiled Gastropods Peter J. Wagner SUB Gfittingen 215 090 918 2002 B 3558 Smithsonian Institution Press »\ Washington, D.C. 2002 Contents Page Introduction 1 Acknowledgments 1 "Archaeogastropods"—A Temporary Definition 2 Review of Previous Phylogenetic Hypotheses 2 Material 4 Specimens 4 Biogeography of Analyzed Species 4 Cladistic Characters 5 Homology Versus Architecture 5 The Paucity of Shell Characters Revisited 5 Sinuses, Slits, Selenizones, and Peripheral Bands 9 Shell Mineralogy and Protoconchs 11 Phylogenetic Analysis 11 Character Deweighting 1—Balancing Continuous Characters 11 Character Deweighting 2—Asymmetry and Changing Homologies 12 Character Analyses 13 Cambrian Molluscs and the Choice of an Outgroup 15 Results 16 Cladogram Statistics and Descriptions 16 Outgroup Analyses 17 Relationships among Early Ordovician Species 21 I. "Euomphalinaes" 21 1.1. "Ophiletoids" 21 1.2. "Macluritoids" 23 1.3. "Ceratopeoids" 26 1.3.1. "Raphistomatids" 26 1.3.1.1. "Lesueurillines" 26 1.3.1.2. "Holopeines" 29 1.3.2. "Helicotomids" 29 1.3.2.1. "Ophiletinines" 31 1.3.2.2. "Euomphalopterines" 31 1.3.2.2.1. "Anomphalides" 31 1.3.2.2.2. "Poleumitides" 31 1.3.2.2.3. "Pseudophorides" 33 II. "Murchisoniinaes" 35 II. 1. "Plethospiroids" 39 11.2. "Straparollinoids" 39 11.3. "Hormotomoids" 39 11.3.1. "Subulitids" 39 11.3.2. "Cyrtostrophids" 43 11.3.2.1. "Goniostrophines" 46 11.3.2.2. "Omospirines" 46 11.4. "Eotomarioids" 50 11.4.1. "Lophospirids" 50 11.4.2. "Clathrospirids" 52 11.4.2.1. "Liospirines" 52 11.4.2.2. "Brachytomariines" 55 m IV SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEOBIOLOGY 11.4.2.2.1. "?Palaeoschismides" 55 11.4.2.2.2. "Phanerotrematides" 57 11.4.2.2.3. "Luciellides" 58 11.4.2.2.4. "Planozonides" 58 Problematica 61 Platyceratoidea 61 Neritoidea 63 Oriostomatoidea 63 Discussion 65 Paleozoic Pleurotomarioids: An Oxymoron? 65 "Euomphalinaes": Two Gills or One? 65 Implications for Relationships among Extant Gastropods 66 Systematic Paleontology 68 Class GASTROPODA Cuvier, 1797 69 Order "ARCHAEOGASTROPODA" Thiele, 1925 69 Family fSlNUOPEIDAE Wenz, 1938 69 Genus ^Sinuopea Ulrich, 1911 69 Genus ^Schizopea Butts, 1926 70 Genus Euconia Ulrich in Ulrich and Scofield, 1897 70 Genus Gasconadia Ulrich in Weller and St. Clair, 1928 70 ?Genus Calaurops Whitfield, 1886 70 Suborder EUOMPHALINA de Koninck, 1881 70 Superfamily fOPHlLETOiDEA trans, nov. Knight, 1956 70 Genus ^Ophilela Vanuxem, 1842 71 Genus "fLecanospira Butts, 1926 71 Genus Ecculiomphalus Portlock, 1843 71 Genus fAsgardaspira, new genus 71 Genus Lytospira Koken, 1896 71 Superfamily MACLURITOIDEA Fischer, 1885 71 Genus -fMacluritella Kirk, 1927 72 Genus -fTeiichispira Yochelson and Jones, 1968 72 Genus ^Maclurites Le Sueur, 1818 72 Genus Maclurina Ulrich and Scofield, 1897 72 Genus Palliseria Wilson, 1924 72 ?Genus Rousseauspira Rohr and Potter, 1987 73 Superfamily fEuOMPHALOlDEA de Koninck, 1844 73 Family fRAPHiSTOMATiDAE Koken, 1896 73 Genus \Ceratopea Ulrich, 1911 73 Genus Bridgeites Flower, 1968a 73 Genus Orospira Butts, 1926 73 Genus Raphistoma Hall, 1847 73 Genus -fScalites Emmons, 1842 74 Family HOLOPEIDAE Wenz, 1938 74 Genus Raphistomina Ulrich and Scofield, 1897 74 Genus -\Pachystrophia Perner, 1903 74 Genus Sinutropis Perner, 1903 75 Genus Umbospira Perner, 1903 75 Genus Holopea Hall, 1847 75 Family LESUEURILLIDAE, new family 75 Genus -fEccyliopterus Remele 1888 75 Genus ^Lesueurilla Koken, 1898 76 Genus Mestoronema, new genus 76 Genus Pararaphistoma Vostokova, 1955 76 Family fHEUCOTOMlDAE Wenz, 1938 76 NUMBER 88 Genus fLophonema Ulrich in Purdue and Miser, 1916 76 Genus Linsleyella Rohr, 1980 76 Genus \Helicotoma Salter, 1859 77 Genus Palaeomphalus Koken, 1925 77 Genus Ophiletina Ulrich and Scofield, 1897 77 Family JEUOMPHALIDAE de Koninck, 1881 77 Genus \Boucotspira Rohr, 1980 77 Genus fEuomphalopterus Roemer, 1876 77 Genus Spinicharybdis Rohr and Packard, 1982 78 Genus -fPoleumita Clarke and Ruedemann, 1903 78 Genus Nodonema Linsley, 1968 78 Genus Centrifugus Bronn, 1834 78 Genus Euomphalus Sowerby, 1814 78 Genus Straparollus de Montfort, 1810 79 Genus Micromphalus Knight, 1945 79 Family ANOMPHALIDAE Wenz, 1938 79 Genus ^Trochomphalus Koken, 1925 79 Genus Pycnomphalus Lindstrom, 1884 79 Family PSEUDOPHORIDAE Miller, 1889 79 Genus Pseudophorus Meek, 1873 79 Genus Pseudotectus Perner, 1903 80 Genus fDiscordichilus Cossmann, 1918 80 Genus Hystricoceras Jahn, 1894 80 Genus Streptotrochus Perner, 1903 80 Genus Elasmonema Fischer, 1885 80 Suborder MURCHISONHNA COX and Knight, 1960 80 Superfamily fMuRCHlSONlOlDEA Koken, 1896 81 Family fHORMOTOMIDAE Wenz, 1938 81 Genus -fHormotoma Salter, 1859 81 Genus iCoelocauIus Oehlert, 1888 81 Genus Catazone Perner, 1903 81 Genus Mesocoelia Perner, 1907 81 Genus Plethospira Ulrich in Ulrich and Scofield, 1897 81 Family MURCHISONIIDAE Koken, 1896 82 Genus ^Murchisonia d'Archaic, 1841 82 Genus Morania Horny, 1953 82 Genus Michelia Roemer, 1854 82 Superfamily LOXONEMATOIDEA Koken, 1889 82 Family LOXONEMATIDAE Koken, 1889 82 Genus -fLoxonema Phillips, 1841 82 Genus fOmospira Ulrich and Scofield, 1897 .' 83 Genus Diplozone Perner, 1907 83 Genus Rhabdostropha Donald, 1905 83 Genus Spiroecus Longstaff, 1924 83 Genus Macrochilus Lindstrom, 1884 83 Genus Stylonema Perner, 1907 84 Superfamily EOTOMARIOIDEA Ulrich and Scofield, 1897 84 Family EOTOMARIIDAE Wenz, 1938 84 Genus \Clathrospira Ulrich and Scofield, 1897 84 ?Genus Spirotomaria Koken, 1925 84 Genus \Eotomaria Ulrich and Scofield, 1897 84 Genus Paraliospira Rohr, 1980 84 Genus Liospira Ulrich and Scofield, 1897 85 Family fGosSELETINlDAE Wenz, 1938 85 VI SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEOBIOLOGY Subfamily fEuRYZONlNAE, new subfamily 85 Genus ^Deaechospira, new genus ;. .. 85 Genus ^Cataschisma Branson, 1909 86 ?Genus Palaeoschisma Donald, 1902 86 Genus \Pleurorima Perner, 1907 86 Genus Euryzone Koken, 1896 86 Genus Latitaenia Koken, 1925 86 Subfamily GOSSELETININAE Wenz, 1938 86 Genus \Stenoloron Oehlert, 1888 86 Genus Platybron Oehlert, 1888 87 Genus Umbotropsis Perner, 1907 87 Family fPHANEROTREMATlDAE Knight, 1956 87 Genus ^Brachytomaria Koken, 1925 87 Genus Phanerotrema Fischer, 1885 87 Genus Ulrichospira Donald, 1905 88 Family LUCIELLIDAE Knight, 1956 88 Genus Conotoma Perner, 1907 88 Genus Prosolarium Perner, 1907 88 Genus Oehlertia Perner, 1907 88 Superfamily LOPHOSPIROIDAE Wenz, 1938 89 Family LOPHOSPIRIDAE Wenz, 1938 89 Genus Ectomaria Koken, 1896 89 Genus Donaldiella Cossmann, 1903 89 Genus Lophospira Whitfield, 1886 89 Genus Proturritella Koken, 1889 89 Genus Eunema Salter, 1859 89 Genus Gyronema Ulrich in Ulrich and Scofield, 1897 89 Genus Ruedemannia Foerste, 1914 89 Genus Loxoplocus Fischer, 1885 90 Genus Longstaffia Cossman, 1908 90 Genus Arjamannia Peel, 1975 90 Genus Trochonemella Okulitch, 1935 90 Family TROCHONEMATIDAE Zittel, 1895 90 Genus Trochonema Salter, 1859 90 Genus Globonema Wenz, 1938 90 Superfamily STRAPAROLLINOIDEA, new superfamily 90 Family STRAPAROLLINIDAE, new family 90 Genus ^Strapamllina Billings, 1865 90 Genus Daidia Salter, 1859 90 Genus Haplospira Koken, 1897 91 Superfamily SUBULITOIDEA Lindstrom, 1884 91 Family SUBULITIDAE Lindstrom, 1884 91 Genus ^Eroicaspira, new genus 91 Genus ^Subulites Emmons, 1842 91 Genus Fusispira Hall, 1872 91 Genus Cyrtospira Ulrich in Ulrich and Scofield, 1897 91 Conclusions 91 Appendix 1: Characters and Character States 93 Appendix 2: Data Matrix 100 Appendix 3: Stratigraphic Data 134 Literature Cited 143.
Recommended publications
  • United States

    United States

    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BULLETIN OF THE UNITED STATES ISTo. 146 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT Pit IN TING OFFICE 189C UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHAKLES D. WALCOTT, DI11ECTOK BIBLIOGRAPHY AND INDEX NORTH AMEEICAN GEOLOGY, PALEONTOLOGY, PETEOLOGT, AND MINERALOGY THE YEA.R 1895 FEED BOUGHTON WEEKS WASHINGTON Cr O V E U N M K N T P K 1 N T I N G OFFICE 1890 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of trail smittal...... ....................... .......................... 7 Introduction.............'................................................... 9 List of publications examined............................................... 11 Classified key to tlio index .......................................... ........ 15 Bibliography ............................................................... 21 Index....................................................................... 89 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DEPARTMENT OF THE INTEEIOE, UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, DIVISION OF GEOLOGY, Washington, D. 0., June 23, 1896. SIR: I have the honor to transmit herewith the manuscript of a Bibliography and Index of North American Geology, Paleontology, Petrology, and Mineralogy for the year 1895, and to request that it be published as a bulletin of the Survey. Very respectfully, F. B. WEEKS. Hon. CHARLES D. WALCOTT, Director United States Geological Survey. 1 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND INDEX OF NORTH AMERICAN GEOLOGY, PALEONTOLOGY, PETROLOGY, AND MINER­ ALOGY FOR THE YEAR 1895. By FRED BOUGHTON WEEKS. INTRODUCTION. The present work comprises a record of publications on North Ameri­ can geology, paleontology, petrology, and mineralogy for the year 1895. It is planned on the same lines as the previous bulletins (Nos. 130 and 135), excepting that abstracts appearing in regular periodicals have been omitted in this volume. Bibliography. The bibliography consists of full titles of separate papers, classified by authors, an abbreviated reference to the publica­ tion in which the paper is printed, and a brief summary of the con­ tents, each paper being numbered for index reference.
  • Introduction. First Biennial Report of the Progress Sketch of the History of Geology of the in Michigan

    Introduction. First Biennial Report of the Progress Sketch of the History of Geology of the in Michigan

    Text extracted from a scan by Google Book Search. INTRODUCTION. FIRST BIENNIAL REPORT OF THE PROGRESS SKETCH OF THE HISTORY OF GEOLOGY OF THE IN MICHIGAN. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF MICHIGAN, Before entering upon the consideration of the subjects EMBRACING OBSERVATIONS ON THE strictly belonging to this Report, a brief notice of what GEOLOGY, ZOÖLOGY, AND BOTANY has heretofore been done in developing the Geology of Michigan, will undoubtedly be acceptable to the people OF THE of our State. LOWER PENINSULA The explorations and discoveries of the Jesuit Missionaries, prosecuted for many years along the borders of the great Lakes, may be passed over as too MADE TO THE GOVERNOR, DECEMBER 31, 1860. remotely connected with the history of Geology in BY AUTHORITY. Michigan, to justify their introduction into the present report. The record of the wonderful labors and LANSING: sufferings of these early christian missionaries, may be Hosmer & Kerr, Printers to the State. found embodied in the numerous volumes of a work 1861. entitled, “Relations de ce que s’est passe de plus Digitized by Google remarquable aux Missions des peres de la compagnie de Jesus, en la Nouvelle France.”* A condensed sketch REPORT OF THE STATE GEOLOGIST. derived from this source, is given in Foster and Whitney’s “Report on the. Geology and Topography of a portion of the Lake Superior Land District, in the State of TO HIS EXCELLENCY MOSES WISNER, Michigan, Part I.” Governor of the State of Michigan: The existence of copper in considerable quantity, upon the shores of Lake Superior, had all along attracted the I have the honor to submit herewith, the Report required attention of the Missionaries.
  • CINCINNATIAN GASTROPOD PRIMER by Ron Fine HOW DO SCIENTISTS CLASSIFY GASTROPODS?

    CINCINNATIAN GASTROPOD PRIMER by Ron Fine HOW DO SCIENTISTS CLASSIFY GASTROPODS?

    CINCINNATIAN GASTROPOD PRIMER By Ron Fine HOW DO SCIENTISTS CLASSIFY GASTROPODS? KINGDOM: Animalia (Animals) Mammals Birds Fish Amphibians Molluscs Insects PHYLUM: Mollusca (Molluscs) Cephalopods Gastropods Bivalves Monoplacophorans Scaphopods Aplacophorans Polyplacophorans CLASS: Gastropoda (Gastropods or Snails) Gastropods 2 HOW MANY KINDS OF GASTROPODS ARE THERE? There are 611 Families of gastropods, but 202 are now extinct Whelk Slug Limpet Land Snail Conch Periwinkle Cowrie Sea Butterfly Nudibranch Oyster Borer 3 THERE ARE 60,000 TO 80,000 SPECIES! IN ENDLESS SHAPES AND PATTERNS! 4 HABITAT-WHERE DO GASTROPODS LIVE? Gardens Deserts Ocean Depths Mountains Ditches Rivers Lakes Estuaries Mud Flats Tropical Rain Forests Rocky Intertidal Woodlands Subtidal Zones Hydrothermal Vents Sub-Arctic/Antarctic Zones 5 HABITAT-WHAT WAS IT LIKE IN THE ORDOVICIAN? Gastropods in the Ordovician of Cincinnati lived in a tropical ocean, much like the Caribbean of today 6 DIET-WHAT DO GASTROPODS EAT? Herbivores Detritus Parasites Plant Eaters Mud Eaters Living on other animals Scavengers Ciliary Carnivores Eat dead animals Filter feeding in the water Meat Eaters 7 ANATOMY-HOW DO YOU IDENTIFY A GASTROPOD? Gastropod is Greek, from “gaster” meaning ‘stomach’ and “poda” meaning ‘foot’ They are characterized by a head with antennae, a large foot, coiled shell, a radula and operculum Torsion: all of a gastropod’s anatomy is twisted, not just the shell They are the largest group of molluscs, only insects are more diverse Most are hermaphrodites 8 GASTROPOD ANATOMY-FOOT Gastropods have a large “foot”, used for locomotion. Undulating bands of muscles propel the gastropod forward, even on vertical surfaces. SLIME! Gastropods excrete slime to help their foot glide over almost any surface.
  • Adulthood and Phylogenetic Analysis in Gastropods: Character Recognition and Coding in Shells of Lavigeria (Cerithioidea, Thiaridae) from Lake Tanganyika

    Adulthood and Phylogenetic Analysis in Gastropods: Character Recognition and Coding in Shells of Lavigeria (Cerithioidea, Thiaridae) from Lake Tanganyika

    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKZOJZoological Journal of the Linnean Society0024-4082The Lin- nean Society of London, 2004? 2004 140? 223240 Original Article L. N. PAPADOPOULOS ET AL .ADULTHOOD AND PHYLOGENETIC CODING IN GASTROPOD SHELLS Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 140, 223–240. With 7 figures Adulthood and phylogenetic analysis in gastropods: character recognition and coding in shells of Lavigeria (Cerithioidea, Thiaridae) from Lake Tanganyika LEONARD N. PAPADOPOULOS1*, JONATHAN A. TODD2 and ELLINOR MICHEL1† 1Institute for Biodiversity & Ecosystem Dynamics/Zoological Museum, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94766, 1090 GT Amsterdam, the Netherlands 2Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK Received February 2003; accepted for publication July 2003 In the study of gastropod shell morphology, determination of comparable ontogenetic stages is crucial, because all the states that various shell features go through during ontogeny are preserved on the shell. The protoconch/teleoconch transition and marks of episodic growth are among the few ways of defining discrete, comparable, growth stages. In gastropods with determinate growth the attainment of adulthood may provide additional shell markers permitting comparison among individuals and taxa. Adulthood is reflected in shell morphology in ways as diverse as shell dep- osition covering all the previous whorls and radically changing the shape of the shell through to slight changes in the trajectory of the suture. While the very prominent adulthood-related changes of shell morphology have been used as systematic characters, the more moderate changes have not been studied in detail and their potential systematic value has been ignored. In this paper we give a detailed account of adult modifications of the shell appearing with cessation of growth.
  • Caenogastropoda

    Caenogastropoda

    13 Caenogastropoda Winston F. Ponder, Donald J. Colgan, John M. Healy, Alexander Nützel, Luiz R. L. Simone, and Ellen E. Strong Caenogastropods comprise about 60% of living Many caenogastropods are well-known gastropod species and include a large number marine snails and include the Littorinidae (peri- of ecologically and commercially important winkles), Cypraeidae (cowries), Cerithiidae (creep- marine families. They have undergone an ers), Calyptraeidae (slipper limpets), Tonnidae extraordinary adaptive radiation, resulting in (tuns), Cassidae (helmet shells), Ranellidae (tri- considerable morphological, ecological, physi- tons), Strombidae (strombs), Naticidae (moon ological, and behavioral diversity. There is a snails), Muricidae (rock shells, oyster drills, etc.), wide array of often convergent shell morpholo- Volutidae (balers, etc.), Mitridae (miters), Buccin- gies (Figure 13.1), with the typically coiled shell idae (whelks), Terebridae (augers), and Conidae being tall-spired to globose or fl attened, with (cones). There are also well-known freshwater some uncoiled or limpet-like and others with families such as the Viviparidae, Thiaridae, and the shells reduced or, rarely, lost. There are Hydrobiidae and a few terrestrial groups, nota- also considerable modifi cations to the head- bly the Cyclophoroidea. foot and mantle through the group (Figure 13.2) Although there are no reliable estimates and major dietary specializations. It is our aim of named species, living caenogastropods are in this chapter to review the phylogeny of this one of the most diverse metazoan clades. Most group, with emphasis on the areas of expertise families are marine, and many (e.g., Strombidae, of the authors. Cypraeidae, Ovulidae, Cerithiopsidae, Triphori- The fi rst records of undisputed caenogastro- dae, Olividae, Mitridae, Costellariidae, Tereb- pods are from the middle and upper Paleozoic, ridae, Turridae, Conidae) have large numbers and there were signifi cant radiations during the of tropical taxa.
  • Greology of Sangamon County

    Greology of Sangamon County

    Greology of Sangamon County A. R. CROOK, Ph. D. Curator Illinois State Museum of Natural History Return this book on or before the Latest Date stamped below. A charge is made on all overdue books. University of Illinois Library MAY 2 9 1:347 OCT18 1982 SOM x1 Gebldgy of Sangamon County BY A. R. CROOK, Ph. D. Curator Illinois State Museum of Natural History 1912 SPRINGFIELD, ILL. ILLINOIS STATE JOURNAL Co., STATB PRINTERS 1*12 7 t - ILLUSTRATIONS. PAGE. Fig. 1 Governor Deneen inspecting Divernon Coal Mine April 20, 1910 1 Fig. 2- Picking pebbles in Illinoian till by an old mill on Sugar Creek 7 Fig. 3 A mass of fossil corals (Syringopora multattenuata) found near Springfield, now in State Museum 12 Fig. 4 Fossil corals (Lophophyllum proliferum) found near Springfield, now in Museum 13 Fig. 5 Fossil brachiopods (Spirifer multigranosa) found near Springfield, now in Museum 13 Fig. 6 Fossil lamillibranchs (Leda) found near Springfield, now in Museum 13 Fig. 7 Fossil gastropods. At the left Phurotomaria tphaerulata, next JBellerophon percarinatus. All from Roll's Ford, now in State Museum 14 Fig. 8 Fossil gastropods (Subulities peracuta and Subulites inornatus) found at Roll's Ford, now in Museum 14 Fig. 9 Outcrop of the limestone (No. 8 in typical section) which furnished the stone for the Old State House, Springfield. Quarry quarter mile west of Crow's Mill 16 Fig. 10 Old Crow's Mill quarry now grass grown 17 Fig. 11 Map of Sangatnon County showing location of coal mines, clay pits, quarries 19 Fig. 12-Sangamon County is a prairie save where streams have fashioned valleys or glaciers de- posited their burdens o 37684 GEOLOGY OF SANGAMON COUNTY.
  • Upper Peninsula

    Upper Peninsula

    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF MICHIGAN. For this object I have zealously worked. How far I have succeeded in the effort the reader may judge; and I shall feel well satisfied if he finds the picture I give worth UPPER PENINSULA attentive study, without having it surrounded by a 1869-1873 borrowed glistening frame, composed of a collection of ACCOMPANIED BY AN items from almost every branch of human knowledge. ATLAS OF MAPS. Very respectfully yours, C. ROMINGER. VOL. I. PART III. PALÆOZOIC ROCKS. INTRODUCTION. BY DR. C. ROMINGER BY the Legislative Assembly of 1871, the continuation of a geological survey of the State of Michigan was determined upon, in such a manner as to divide the work PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE LEGISLATURE OF into three districts, each of which was to be investigated MICHIGAN. independently by different parties. UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE BOARD OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. The third district, intrusted to me, comprises the Lower Peninsula, and the eastern half of the Upper Peninsula, NEW YORK or that portion which Is not included in the iron and JULIUS BIEN copper regions. Its surface rock is exclusively 1873 composed of members of the palæozoic series; while In Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1873, by the other two, older crystalline and metamorphic rocks GOVERNOR J. J. BAGLEY, prevail. for the State of Michigan, in the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington. On the Lower Peninsula only a partial reconnoissance TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF tour has been made through Little Traverse Bay region.
  • Caenogastropoda During Mesozoic Times

    Caenogastropoda During Mesozoic Times

    Caenogastropoda during Mesozoic times Klaus Bandel Bandel, K. Caenogastropoda during Mesozoic times. — Scripta Geol., Spec. Issue 2: 7-56, 15 pls. Lei• den, December 1993. Klaus Bandel, Institut für Paläontologie und Geologie, Universität Hamburg, Bundesstraße 55, D 20146 Hamburg 13, Germany. Key words: evolution, Mollusca, Gastropoda, Mesozoicum. The following groups of Mesozoic Caenogastropoda are discussed here: Cerithioidea and Littorinoi- dea-Rissooidea seemingly merging with each other during Triassic times; the fresh water and land snails of the Viviparoidea and Cyclophoroidea with unknown marine relatives but a Mesozoic histo• ry; the Vermetoidea, Turritelloidea and Campaniloidea with a late appearance in the Mesozoic; the Ctenoglossa with a continuous history from the Middle Palaeozoic to modern times; the Subulitoidea, Murchisonioidea and Loxonematoidea with Palaeozoic ancestors but unclear Middle Mesozoic rela• tions; the Purpurinoidea as potential ancestors and relatives of the Stromboidea, the latter suddenly appearing in the Jurassic; the Heteropoda and Vanikoroidea with possible relation to each other but very uncertain relations to the others; and the Neomesogastropoda and Neogastropoda which begin their history in the Mid Cretaceous with still rather uncertain precursors. Contents Introduction 7 Taxonomie discussion 8 Palaeo-Caenogastropoda 8 Meta-Mesogastropoda 24 Neomesogastropoda 30 Neogastropoda 39 Conclusions 44 Acknowledgements 46 References 51 Introduction The history of most groups of Caenogastropoda during Palaeozoic times is still uncertain. Only the Subulitoidea, Murchisonioidea, Loxonematoidea and Zygopleur- oidea, and questionable Cerithioidea of the Stegocoelia type, can be traced through much of the Palaeozoic (Knight, 1931; Wenz, 1938-1944; Knight et al., 1960; Hoare & Sturgeon, 1978, 1980a, 1980b, 1981, 1985; Yoo, 1988, 1989; Bandel, 1991a; own data).
  • The Continuing Debate on Deep Molluscan Phylogeny: Evidence for Serialia (Mollusca, Monoplacophora + Polyplacophora)

    The Continuing Debate on Deep Molluscan Phylogeny: Evidence for Serialia (Mollusca, Monoplacophora + Polyplacophora)

    The Continuing Debate on Deep Molluscan Phylogeny: Evidence for Serialia (Mollusca, Monoplacophora + Polyplacophora) Stöger, I., Sigwart, J. D., Kano, Y., Marshall, B. A., Schwabe, E., & Schrödl, M. (2013). The Continuing Debate on Deep Molluscan Phylogeny: Evidence for Serialia (Mollusca, Monoplacophora + Polyplacophora). BioMed Research International, 2013, [407072]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/407072 Published in: BioMed Research International Document Version: Early version, also known as pre-print Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright 2013 The authors General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:11. Jan. 2021 The continuing debate on deep molluscan phylogeny: Evidence for Serialia (Mollusca, Monoplacophora + Polyplacophora) I. Stöger1, J. D. Sigwart2, Y. Kano3, T. Knebelsberger4, B. A. Marshall5, E. Schwabe1, M. Schrödl1§ 1Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247 Munich, Germany. GeoBioCenterLMU and Department II, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig Maximilians-Universität München, Germany.
  • Stratigraphy, Structure and Early Paleozoic Gastropoda of the Callahan Area, Klameth Mountains, California

    Stratigraphy, Structure and Early Paleozoic Gastropoda of the Callahan Area, Klameth Mountains, California

    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF David Malcolm Rohr for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geology presented on 15 June 1977 Title:STRATIGRAPHY, STRUCTURE, AND EARLY PALEOZOIC GASTROPODA OF THE CALLAHAN AREA, KLAMATH MOUNTAINS, CALIFORNIA Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: A. IV Boucot The sedimentary, metamorphic, and igneous rocks of the Callahan, California area formed on, or adjacent to, a Lower Paleo- zoic island arc complex which has since been tectonically disrupted. Sandstone, shale, lithic wacke, chert, banded quartzite, siliceous mudstone, conglomerate, and limestone of the eastern Klamath belt were deposited from the Middle Ordovician through the Early Devonian on top of the peridotite of the Early? Ordovician Trinity ophiolitic complex.Shallow water deposition began in the Middle Ordovician with the Facey Rock Limestone.Sandstone, siltstone, and shale of the Moffett Creek Formation probably formed as turbidity flows adjacent to the arc and were later disrupted, possibly at shallow depths in a subduction zone.Other units in the Callahan area (Calla- han Chert, Gazelle Formation, quartzite of Squaw Gulch, siliceous mudstone of Thompson Gulch) may have formed in basins on the Moffett Creek Formation. The Moffett Creek Formation was derived from a primarily plutonic-metamorphic terrane, possibly a deeply eroded arc complex, while the overlying Gazelle Formation was derived from a primarily calc-alkaline volcanic source. Amphibolite and impure marbles of the Grouse Ridge Formation, which have an Early or Middle Devonian age
  • 325015 1 En Bookbackmatter 357..405

    325015 1 En Bookbackmatter 357..405

    Appendix © Springer India 2017 357 S. Jain, Fundamentals of Invertebrate Palaeontology, Springer Geology, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-3658-0 358 Ch. no. Species name Age Locality Chapter Fig. no. Fig. no. 2 Otavia antiqua Brian et al. Cryogenian-Ediacaran Namibia, South Africa Sponges 1 1 2 Sycetta sagittifera Haeckel Recent South India Sponges 3 6 2 Archaeocyaths atlanticus Billings Early Cambrian West coast, USA Sponges 7 3–4 2 Ajacicyathus nevadensis Oklulitch Early Cambrian West coast, USA Sponges 7 5 2 Ethmophyllum whitneyi Meek Cambrian British Columbia, Canada Sponges 7 6–7 2 Pycnoidocyathus occidentalis (Raymond) Early Cambrian British Columbia, Canada Sponges 7 8 2 Protospongia fenestrate Salter Middle Cambrian (Burgess) British Columbia, Canada Sponges 8 1 2 Chancelloria eros Walcott Middle Cambrian (Burgess) British Columbia, Canada Sponges 8 2 2 Eiffelia globosa Walcott Middle Cambrian (Burgess) British Columbia, Canada Sponges 8 3 2 Choia carteri Walcott Middle Cambrian (Burgess) British Columbia, Canada Sponges 8 4 2 Brachiospongia digitata (Owen) Middle Ordovician Kentucky, USA Sponges 9 1 2 Hindia parva Ulrich Middle Ordovician Minnesota, USA Sponges 9 2–3 2 Ischadites iowensis (Owen) Middle Ordovician Kentucky, USA Sponges 9 4 2 Receptaculites oweni Hall Middle Ordovician Kentucky, USA Sponges 9 5 2 Astaeospongia meniscus (Roemer) Middle Silurian (Niagaran) Tennessee, USA Sponges 10 1–2 2 Prismodictya prismatica (Hall) Late Devonian New York, USA Sponges 10 3 2 Prismodictya telum (Hall) Late Devonian New York, USA Sponges 10
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of the Earliest Anisostrophically Coiled Gastropods SERIES PUBLICATIONS of the SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION

    Phylogenetic Relationships of the Earliest Anisostrophically Coiled Gastropods SERIES PUBLICATIONS of the SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION

    HKT *£ir «cT 4»BBb %* Alft Phylogenetic Relationships of the Earliest Anisostrophically Coiled Gastropods SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology Smithsonian Folklife Studies Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world of science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review.