Functional Integration: Action and Symmetries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Functional Integration: Action and Symmetries Functional Integration: Action and Symmetries P. Cartier and C. DeWitt-Morette 3 Acknowledgements Throughout the years, several institutions and their directors have pro- vided the support necessary for the research and completion of this book. From the inception of our collaboration in the late seventies to the con- clusion of this book, the Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques (IHES) at Bures-sur-Yvette has provided “La paix n´ecessaire `aun travail intellectuel intense et la stimulation d’un auditoire d’´elite” . We have received much † help from the Director, J.P. Bourguignon, and the intelligent and always helpful supportive staff of the IHES. Thanks to a grant from the Lounsbery Foundation in 2003 C. DeW. has spent three months at the IHES. Among several institutions which have given us block of uninterrupted time, the Mathematical Institute of the University of Warwick played a special role thanks to K. David Elworthy and his mentoring of one of us (C. DeW.). In the Fall 2002, one of us (C.DeW.) was privileged to teach a course at the Sharif University of Technology (Tehran), jointly with Neda Sadooghi. C.DeW. created the course from the first draft of this book; the quality, the motivation, and the contributions of the students (16 men, 14 women) made teaching this course the experience that we all dream of. The Department of Physics, and the Center for Relativity of the University of Texas at Austin, have been home to one of us, and a welcoming retreat to the other. Thanks to Alfred Schild, founder and director of the Center for Relativity, one of us (C.DeW.) resumed a full scientific career after sixteen years cramped by alleged nepotism rules. This book has been so long on the drawing board that many friends have contributed to its preparation. One of them, Alex Wurm, has helped C. DeW. in all aspects of the preparation from critical comments to typing the final version. C´ecile thanks her graduate students My career began on October 1, 1944. My gratitude encompasses many teachers and colleagues. The list would be an exercise in name-dropping. For this book I wish to bring forth the names of those who have been my graduate students. Working with graduate students has been the most rewarding experience of my professional life. In a few years the relationship evolves from guiding a student to being guided by a promising young colleague. Dissertations often begin with a challenging statement. When completed, An expression of L. Rosenfeld. † 4 a good dissertation is a wonderful document, understandable, carefully crafted, well referenced, presenting new results in a broad context. I am proud and humble to thank: Michael G.G. Laidlaw (Ph.D. 1971, UNC Chapel Hill) Quantum Mechanics in Multiply Connected Spaces. Maurice M. Mizrahi (Ph.D. 1975, UT Austin) An Investigation of the Feyn- man Path Integral Formulation of Quantum Mechanics. Bruce L. Nelson (Ph.D. 1978, UT Austin) Relativity, Topology, and Path Integration. Benny Sheeks (Ph.D. 1979, UT Austin) Some Applications of Path Integra- tion Using Prodistributions. Theodore A. Jacobson, (Ph.D. 1983, UT Austin) Spinor Chain Path Integral for the Dirac Electron. Tian Rong Zhang, (Ph.D. 1985, UT Austin) Path Integral Formulation of Scattering Theory With Application to Scattering by Black Holes. Alice Mae Young (Ph.D. 1985, UT Austin) Change of Variable in the Path Integral Using Stochastic Calculus. Charles Rogers Doering (Ph.D. 1985, UT Austin) Functional Stochastic Dif- ferential Equations: Mathematical Theory of Nonlinear Parabolic Systems with Applications in Field Theory and Statistical Mechanics. Stephen Low (Ph.D. 1985, UT Austin) Path Integration on Spacetimes with Symmetry. John La Chapelle (Ph.D. 1995, UT Austin) Functional Integration on Sym- plectic Manifolds. Clemens S. Utzny (Master 1995, UT Austin) Application of a New Approach to Functional Integration to Mesoscopic Systems. Alexander Wurm (Master 1995, UT Austin) Angular Momentum-to-Angular Momentum Transition in the DeWitt/Cartier Path Integral Formalism. Xiao-Rong Wu-Morrow (Ph.D. 1996, UT Austin) Topological Invariants and Green’s Functions on a Lattice. Alexander Wurm (Diplomarbeit, 1997, Julius-Maximilians-Universit¨at, W¨urz- burg), The Cartier/DeWitt Path Integral Formalism and its Extension to Fixed Energy Green’s Functions. David Collins (Ph.D. 1997, UT Austin) Two-State Quantum Systems Inter- acting with their Environments: A Functional Integral Approach. 5 Christian Saemann (Master 2001, UT Austin) A new representation of cre- ation/annihilation operators for supersymmetric systems. Matthias Ihl (Master 2001, UT Austin) The Bose/Fermi oscillators in a new supersymmetric representation. Gustav Markus Berg (Ph.D. 2001, UT Austin) Geometry, Renormalization, and Supersymmetry. Alexander Wurm (Ph.D. 2002, UT Austin) Renormalization Group Appli- cations in Area-Preserving Nontwist Maps and Relativistic Quantum Field Theory. Marie E. Bell (Master 2002, UT Austin) Introduction to Supersymmetry. 6 Symbols A := B A is defined by B A = B both sides are equal only after they are R integrated B > A B is inside the light cone of A − d×l = dl/l multiplicative differential ∂×/∂l = l∂/∂l multiplicative derivative D D R , RD are dual of each other; R is a space of contra- variant vectors, RD is a space of covariant vectors D D R × space of D by D matrices X, X′ X′ is dual to X x ,x dual product of x X and x X h ′ i ∈ ′ ∈ ′ (x y) scalar product of x, y X, assuming a metric | ∈ MD, g D-dimensional riemannian space with metric g T M tangent bundle over M ¡ ¢ T ∗M contangent bundle over M Lie derivative in the X-direction LX U 2D(S) Space of critical points of the action functional S (Ch 4) MD Space of paths with values in MD, satisfying Pµ,ν µ initial conditions and ν final conditions ¡ ¢ U := U 2D(S) MD arena for WKB µ,ν ∩ Pµ,ν } ¡ ¢ ~ = h/2π Planck’s constant 2 1 [h]= ML T − physical (engineering) dimension of h ω = 2πν ν frequency, ω pulsation t = i~β = i~k T (1.70) B − − B τ = it (1.100) Superanalysis (Ch 9) A˜ parity of A 0, 1 ∈ { } AB = ( 1)A˜B˜ BA graded commutator or [A, B] (9.5) − A B = ( 1)A˜B˜ B A graded anticommutator A, B (9.6) ∧ − − ∧ { } ξµξα = ξαξµ Grassmann generators (9.11) − z = u + v supernumber, u even C , v odd C (9.12) ∈ c ∈ a R real elements of (9.16) c ⊂ Cc Cc 7 R C real elements of (9.16) a ⊂ a Ca z = zB + zS supernumber zB body, zS soul (9.12) xA = (xa, ξα) Rn ν superpoints ∈ | 8 Conventions Fourier transforms D D ( f) x′ := d x exp 2πi x,x′ f(x) x R ,x′ RD F RD − h i ∈ ∈ Z For Grassmann¡ ¢ variables ¡ ¢ ( f) (κ) := dξ exp( 2πiκξ) f(ξ) F − Z In both cases δ, f = f(0) i.e. δ(ξ)= c 1ξ h i − 2 1 δ, f = f i.e. c = (2πi)− hF i 2 1 dξ ξ = c, here c = (2πi)− Z 9 Formulary (giving a context to symbols) Wiener integral • τb E exp dτ V (q(τ) (1.1) − · µ Zτa ¶¸ Peierls bracket • A˜B˜ (A, B) := D−B ( 1) D−B (1.9) A − − A Schwinger variational principle • δ A B = i A δS/~ B (1.11) h | i h | | i Quantum partition function • βHˆ Z(β) = Tr e− (1.71) ³ ´ Schr¨odinger equation • 1 2 1 i∂tψ(x,t) = 2 µ δx + ~− V (x) ψ(x,t) − (1.77) ψ (x,t ) = φ¡ (x) ¢ a µ2 = ~/m Gaussian integral (2.29), (2.30) • dΓs,Q(x) exp 2πi x′,x := exp sπW x′ X − h i − Z ¡ ¢ ¡ ¡ ¢¢ π dΓs,Qx = s,Qx exp Q(x) R D − s ³ ´ Q(x)= Dx,x , W x′ = x′, Gx′ (2.28) h i h i ¡ ¢ s n ′ dΓs,Q(x) x1′ ,x ... x2′ n,x = W xi′ ,xi′ ...W xi′ ,xi′ X h i h i 2π 1 2 2n−1 2n Z ³ ´ X ¡ ¢ ³ ´ sum without repetition linear maps • Ly˜ ,x = y ,Lx (2.58) h ′ i h ′ i WY′ = WX′ L˜ , QX = QY L (Ch 3) ◦ ◦ 10 Scaling and coarse graining (section 2.5) • [u] u Slu(x)= l u l a b¡ ¢ SL[a, b[= l , l P : S £µ £ (2.83) l l/l0 · [l∞,l[∗ Jacobi operator • S′′(q) ξξ = (q) ξ, ξ (5.7) · hJ · i • b Oˆ a = O(γ)exp(iS(γ)/~) µ(γ) γ (Ch 6) h | | i D ZPab Time ordered exponential • t T exp ds A(s) (6.38) Zt0 Dynamical vector fields • A dx(t,z)= X(A) (x(t,z)) dz (t)+ Y (x(t,z)) dt (7.14) π Ψ(t,x0) := s,Q0 z exp Q0(z) φ x0 (t,z) (7.12) D 0R D · − s · ZP ³ ´ ³ X ´ A B Q0(z) := dt hABz˙ (t)˙z (t)(7.8) T Z ∂Ψ s AB ∂t = 4π h X(A) X(B) Ψ+ Y Ψ L L L (7.15) Ψ (t , x)= φ(x) 0 Homotopy • α K (b, tb; a,ta) = χ(α)K (b, tb; a,ta) (Ch 8) | | ¯ ¯ ¯ α ¯ ¯X ¯ Koszul formula ¯ ¯ • ¯ ¯ ω = Div (X) ω (11.1) LX ω · 11 Miscellaneous • det exp A = exptr A (11.48) 1 d log det A = tr A− dA (11.47) ij j −1 f := g ∂f/∂x¡ ¢ gradient (11.73) ∇g j −1 V = V divergence (11.74) ∇g | g ,j (¡V f)=¢ (divV f) gradient/divergence (11.79) |∇ − | Poisson processes • N(t) := ∞ θ (t T ) counting process (13.17) k=1 − k Density of energyP states • ρ(E)= δ (E E ) , Hψ = E ψ − n n n n n X Time ordering • φ(x )φ(x ) for j >i j i − T (φ(xj)φ(xi)) = (15.7) φ(x )φ(x ) for i > j i j − Wick (normal ordering) • operator normal ordering 2 a + a† a + a† =: : a + a† :+1 (D.1) ³ ´ ³ ´ ³ ´ functional normal ordering 1 : F (φ): := exp ∆ F (φ) (D.4) G −2 G µ ¶ functional laplacian defined by the covariance G δ δ ∆ = dvol(x) dvol(y) G(x, y) G δφ(x) δφ(y) Z Z The “Measure” (Ch 18) • µ[φ] (sdet G+[φ]) (18.3) ≈ S [φ] G+kj[φ]= δj , (18.4) i, ,k −i, G+ij[φ] = 0 when i > j (18.5) − 12 i i A I A φ = uin Aain + uin∗Aain∗ (18.18) i X i X = uout X aout + uout∗ Aaout∗ Contents Acknowledgements page 3 Symbols, Conventions and Formulary 6 Part One: The Physical and Mathematical Environment 1 The Physical and Mathematical Environment 18 1.1 The beginning 18 1.2 Integrals over function spaces 21 1.3 Operator formalism 22 1.4 A few titles 23 1.5 A tutorial in Lebesgue integration 25 1.6 Stochastic processes and promeasures 31 1.7 Fourier transformation and prodistributions 36 1.8 Planck’s blackbody radiation law 40 1.9 Imaginary time and inverse temperature 42 1.10 Feynman’s integral vs.
Recommended publications
  • FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS 1. Banach and Hilbert Spaces in What
    FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS PIOTR HAJLASZ 1. Banach and Hilbert spaces In what follows K will denote R of C. Definition. A normed space is a pair (X, k · k), where X is a linear space over K and k · k : X → [0, ∞) is a function, called a norm, such that (1) kx + yk ≤ kxk + kyk for all x, y ∈ X; (2) kαxk = |α|kxk for all x ∈ X and α ∈ K; (3) kxk = 0 if and only if x = 0. Since kx − yk ≤ kx − zk + kz − yk for all x, y, z ∈ X, d(x, y) = kx − yk defines a metric in a normed space. In what follows normed paces will always be regarded as metric spaces with respect to the metric d. A normed space is called a Banach space if it is complete with respect to the metric d. Definition. Let X be a linear space over K (=R or C). The inner product (scalar product) is a function h·, ·i : X × X → K such that (1) hx, xi ≥ 0; (2) hx, xi = 0 if and only if x = 0; (3) hαx, yi = αhx, yi; (4) hx1 + x2, yi = hx1, yi + hx2, yi; (5) hx, yi = hy, xi, for all x, x1, x2, y ∈ X and all α ∈ K. As an obvious corollary we obtain hx, y1 + y2i = hx, y1i + hx, y2i, hx, αyi = αhx, yi , Date: February 12, 2009. 1 2 PIOTR HAJLASZ for all x, y1, y2 ∈ X and α ∈ K. For a space with an inner product we define kxk = phx, xi . Lemma 1.1 (Schwarz inequality).
    [Show full text]
  • Funaional Integration for Solving the Schroedinger Equation
    Comitato Nazionale Energia Nucleare Funaional Integration for Solving the Schroedinger Equation A. BOVE. G. FANO. A.G. TEOLIS RT/FIMÀ(7$ Comitato Nazionale Energia Nucleare Funaional Integration for Solving the Schroedinger Equation A. BOVE, G.FANO, A.G.TEOLIS 3 1. INTRODUCTION Vesto pervenuto il 2 agosto 197) It ia well-known (aee e.g. tei. [lj - |3| ) that the infinite-diaeneional r«nctional integration ia a powerful tool in all the evolution processes toth of the type of the heat -tanefer or Scbroediager equation. Since the 'ieid of applications of functional integration ia rapidly increasing, it *«*ae dcairahle to study the «stood from the nuaerical point of view, at leaat in siaple caaea. Such a orograa baa been already carried out by Cria* and Scorer (ace ref. |«| - |7| ), via Monte-Carlo techniques. We use extensively an iteration aethod which coneiecs in successively squa£ ing < denaicy matrix (aee Eq.(9)), since in principle ic allows a great accuracy. This aetbod was used only tarely before (aee ref. |4| ). Fur- chersjore we give an catiaate of che error (e«e Eqs. (U),(26)) boch in Che caaa of Wiener and unleabeck-Ometein integral. Contrary to the cur­ rent opinion (aae ref. |13| ), we find that the last integral ia too sen­ sitive to the choice of the parameter appearing in the haraonic oscilla­ tor can, in order to be useful except in particular caaea. In this paper we study the one-particle spherically sysssetric case; an application to the three nucleon probUa is in progress (sea ref. |U| ). St»wp«wirìf^m<'oUN)p^woMG>miutoN«i»OMtop«fl'Ht>p>i«Wi*faif»,Piijl(Mi^fcri \ptt,mt><r\A, i uwh P.ei#*mià, Uffcio Eanfeai SaMfiM», " ~ Hot*, Vi.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Linear Spaces
    Chapter 2 Linear Spaces Contents FieldofScalars ........................................ ............. 2.2 VectorSpaces ........................................ .............. 2.3 Subspaces .......................................... .............. 2.5 Sumofsubsets........................................ .............. 2.5 Linearcombinations..................................... .............. 2.6 Linearindependence................................... ................ 2.7 BasisandDimension ..................................... ............. 2.7 Convexity ............................................ ............ 2.8 Normedlinearspaces ................................... ............... 2.9 The `p and Lp spaces ............................................. 2.10 Topologicalconcepts ................................... ............... 2.12 Opensets ............................................ ............ 2.13 Closedsets........................................... ............. 2.14 Boundedsets......................................... .............. 2.15 Convergence of sequences . ................... 2.16 Series .............................................. ............ 2.17 Cauchysequences .................................... ................ 2.18 Banachspaces....................................... ............... 2.19 Completesubsets ....................................... ............. 2.19 Transformations ...................................... ............... 2.21 Lineartransformations.................................. ................ 2.21
    [Show full text]
  • НОВОСИБИРСК Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
    ИНСТИТУТ ЯДЕРНОЙ ФИЗИКИ им. Г.И. Будкера СО РАН Sudker Institute of Nuclear Physics P.G. Silvestrcv CONSTRAINED INSTANTON AND BARYON NUMBER NON­CONSERVATION AT HIGH ENERGIES BIJ'DKERINP «2­92 НОВОСИБИРСК Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia P.G.SUvestrov CONSTRAINED INSTANTON AND BARYON NUMBER NON-CONSERVATION AT HIGH ENERGIES BUDKERINP 92-92 NOVOSIBIRSK 1992 Constrained Instanton and Baryon Number Non­Conservation at High Energies P.G.Silvestrov1 Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia Abstract The total cross ­ section for baryon number violating processes at high energies is usually parametrized as <r«,toi oe exp(—.F(e)), where 5 = Л/З/EQ EQ = у/^ттпш/tx. In the present paper the third nontrivial term of the expansion is obtain^. The unknown corrections to F{e) are expected to be of 8 3 2 the order of c ' , but have neither (mhfmw) , nor log(e) enhance­ ment. The .total cross ­ section is extremely sensitive to the value of single Instanton action. The correction to Instanton action A5 ~ (mp)* log(mp)/</2 is found (p is the Instanton radius). For sufficiently heavy Higgs boson the p­dependent part of the Instanton action is changed drastically, in this case even the leading contribution to F(e), responsible for a growth of cross ­ section due to the multiple produc­ tion of classical W­bosons, is changed: ©Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics 'е­таЦ address! PStt.VESTBOV®INP.NSK.SU 1 Introduction A few years ago it was recognized, that the total cross­section for baryon 1БЭ number violating processes, which is small like ехр(­4т/а) as 10~ [1] 2 (where a = р /(4тг)) at low energies, may become unsuppressed at TeV energies [2, 3, 4].
    [Show full text]
  • General Inner Product & Fourier Series
    General Inner Products 1 General Inner Product & Fourier Series Advanced Topics in Linear Algebra, Spring 2014 Cameron Braithwaite 1 General Inner Product The inner product is an algebraic operation that takes two vectors of equal length and com- putes a single number, a scalar. It introduces a geometric intuition for length and angles of vectors. The inner product is a generalization of the dot product which is the more familiar operation that's specific to the field of real numbers only. Euclidean space which is limited to 2 and 3 dimensions uses the dot product. The inner product is a structure that generalizes to vector spaces of any dimension. The utility of the inner product is very significant when proving theorems and runing computations. An important aspect that can be derived is the notion of convergence. Building on convergence we can move to represenations of functions, specifally periodic functions which show up frequently. The Fourier series is an expansion of periodic functions specific to sines and cosines. By the end of this paper we will be able to use a Fourier series to represent a wave function. To build toward this result many theorems are stated and only a few have proofs while some proofs are trivial and left for the reader to save time and space. Definition 1.11 Real Inner Product Let V be a real vector space and a; b 2 V . An inner product on V is a function h ; i : V x V ! R satisfying the following conditions: (a) hαa + α0b; ci = αha; ci + α0hb; ci (b) hc; αa + α0bi = αhc; ai + α0hc; bi (c) ha; bi = hb; ai (d) ha; aiis a positive real number for any a 6= 0 Definition 1.12 Complex Inner Product Let V be a vector space.
    [Show full text]
  • Function Space Tensor Decomposition and Its Application in Sports Analytics
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 12-2019 Function Space Tensor Decomposition and its Application in Sports Analytics Justin Reising East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Applied Statistics Commons, Multivariate Analysis Commons, and the Other Applied Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Reising, Justin, "Function Space Tensor Decomposition and its Application in Sports Analytics" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3676. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3676 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Function Space Tensor Decomposition and its Application in Sports Analytics A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of Mathematics East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Mathematical Sciences by Justin Reising December 2019 Jeff Knisley, Ph.D. Nicole Lewis, Ph.D. Michele Joyner, Ph.D. Keywords: Sports Analytics, PCA, Tensor Decomposition, Functional Analysis. ABSTRACT Function Space Tensor Decomposition and its Application in Sports Analytics by Justin Reising Recent advancements in sports information and technology systems have ushered in a new age of applications of both supervised and unsupervised analytical techniques in the sports domain. These automated systems capture large volumes of data points about competitors during live competition.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Functional Distance Measures When Calibrating Journey-To-Crime Distance Decay Algorithms
    USING FUNCTIONAL DISTANCE MEASURES WHEN CALIBRATING JOURNEY-TO-CRIME DISTANCE DECAY ALGORITHMS A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Natural Sciences in The Interdepartmental Program of Natural Sciences by Joshua David Kent B.S., Louisiana State University, 1994 December 2003 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The work reported in this research was partially supported by the efforts of Dr. James Mitchell of the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development - Information Technology section for donating portions of the Geographic Data Technology (GDT) Dynamap®-Transportation data set. Additional thanks are paid for the thirty-five residence of East Baton Rouge Parish who graciously supplied the travel data necessary for the successful completion of this study. The author also wishes to acknowledge the support expressed by Dr. Michael Leitner, Dr. Andrew Curtis, Mr. DeWitt Braud, and Dr. Frank Cartledge - their efforts helped to make this thesis possible. Finally, the author thanks his wonderful wife and supportive family for their encouragement and tolerance. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................................. ii LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................................... v LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Calculus of Variations
    MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 16.323 Principles of Optimal Control Spring 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 16.323 Lecture 5 Calculus of Variations • Calculus of Variations • Most books cover this material well, but Kirk Chapter 4 does a particularly nice job. • See here for online reference. x(t) x*+ αδx(1) x*- αδx(1) x* αδx(1) −αδx(1) t t0 tf Figure by MIT OpenCourseWare. Spr 2008 16.323 5–1 Calculus of Variations • Goal: Develop alternative approach to solve general optimization problems for continuous systems – variational calculus – Formal approach will provide new insights for constrained solutions, and a more direct path to the solution for other problems. • Main issue – General control problem, the cost is a function of functions x(t) and u(t). � tf min J = h(x(tf )) + g(x(t), u(t), t)) dt t0 subject to x˙ = f(x, u, t) x(t0), t0 given m(x(tf ), tf ) = 0 – Call J(x(t), u(t)) a functional. • Need to investigate how to find the optimal values of a functional. – For a function, we found the gradient, and set it to zero to find the stationary points, and then investigated the higher order derivatives to determine if it is a maximum or minimum. – Will investigate something similar for functionals. June 18, 2008 Spr 2008 16.323 5–2 • Maximum and Minimum of a Function – A function f(x) has a local minimum at x� if f(x) ≥ f(x �) for all admissible x in �x − x�� ≤ � – Minimum can occur at (i) stationary point, (ii) at a boundary, or (iii) a point of discontinuous derivative.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet Functional Analysis
    Fact Sheet Functional Analysis Literature: Hackbusch, W.: Theorie und Numerik elliptischer Differentialgleichungen. Teubner, 1986. Knabner, P., Angermann, L.: Numerik partieller Differentialgleichungen. Springer, 2000. Triebel, H.: H¨ohere Analysis. Harri Deutsch, 1980. Dobrowolski, M.: Angewandte Funktionalanalysis, Springer, 2010. 1. Banach- and Hilbert spaces Let V be a real vector space. Normed space: A norm is a mapping k · k : V ! [0; 1), such that: kuk = 0 , u = 0; (definiteness) kαuk = jαj · kuk; α 2 R; u 2 V; (positive scalability) ku + vk ≤ kuk + kvk; u; v 2 V: (triangle inequality) The pairing (V; k · k) is called a normed space. Seminorm: In contrast to a norm there may be elements u 6= 0 such that kuk = 0. It still holds kuk = 0 if u = 0. Comparison of two norms: Two norms k · k1, k · k2 are called equivalent if there is a constant C such that: −1 C kuk1 ≤ kuk2 ≤ Ckuk1; u 2 V: If only one of these inequalities can be fulfilled, e.g. kuk2 ≤ Ckuk1; u 2 V; the norm k · k1 is called stronger than the norm k · k2. k · k2 is called weaker than k · k1. Topology: In every normed space a canonical topology can be defined. A subset U ⊂ V is called open if for every u 2 U there exists a " > 0 such that B"(u) = fv 2 V : ku − vk < "g ⊂ U: Convergence: A sequence vn converges to v w.r.t. the norm k · k if lim kvn − vk = 0: n!1 1 A sequence vn ⊂ V is called Cauchy sequence, if supfkvn − vmk : n; m ≥ kg ! 0 for k ! 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Inner Product Spaces
    CHAPTER 6 Woman teaching geometry, from a fourteenth-century edition of Euclid’s geometry book. Inner Product Spaces In making the definition of a vector space, we generalized the linear structure (addition and scalar multiplication) of R2 and R3. We ignored other important features, such as the notions of length and angle. These ideas are embedded in the concept we now investigate, inner products. Our standing assumptions are as follows: 6.1 Notation F, V F denotes R or C. V denotes a vector space over F. LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR THIS CHAPTER Cauchy–Schwarz Inequality Gram–Schmidt Procedure linear functionals on inner product spaces calculating minimum distance to a subspace Linear Algebra Done Right, third edition, by Sheldon Axler 164 CHAPTER 6 Inner Product Spaces 6.A Inner Products and Norms Inner Products To motivate the concept of inner prod- 2 3 x1 , x 2 uct, think of vectors in R and R as x arrows with initial point at the origin. x R2 R3 H L The length of a vector in or is called the norm of x, denoted x . 2 k k Thus for x .x1; x2/ R , we have The length of this vector x is p D2 2 2 x x1 x2 . p 2 2 x1 x2 . k k D C 3 C Similarly, if x .x1; x2; x3/ R , p 2D 2 2 2 then x x1 x2 x3 . k k D C C Even though we cannot draw pictures in higher dimensions, the gener- n n alization to R is obvious: we define the norm of x .x1; : : : ; xn/ R D 2 by p 2 2 x x1 xn : k k D C C The norm is not linear on Rn.
    [Show full text]
  • Calculus of Variations Raju K George, IIST
    Calculus of Variations Raju K George, IIST Lecture-1 In Calculus of Variations, we will study maximum and minimum of a certain class of functions. We first recall some maxima/minima results from the classical calculus. Maxima and Minima Let X and Y be two arbitrary sets and f : X Y be a well-defined function having domain → X and range Y . The function values f(x) become comparable if Y is IR or a subset of IR. Thus, optimization problem is valid for real valued functions. Let f : X IR be a real valued → function having X as its domain. Now x X is said to be maximum point for the function f if 0 ∈ f(x ) f(x) x X. The value f(x ) is called the maximum value of f. Similarly, x X is 0 ≥ ∀ ∈ 0 0 ∈ said to be a minimum point for the function f if f(x ) f(x) x X and in this case f(x ) is 0 ≤ ∀ ∈ 0 the minimum value of f. Sufficient condition for having maximum and minimum: Theorem (Weierstrass Theorem) Let S IR and f : S IR be a well defined function. Then f will have a maximum/minimum ⊆ → under the following sufficient conditions. 1. f : S IR is a continuous function. → 2. S IR is a bound and closed (compact) subset of IR. ⊂ Note that the above conditions are just sufficient conditions but not necessary. Example 1: Let f : [ 1, 1] IR defined by − → 1 x = 0 f(x)= − x x = 0 | | 6 1 −1 +1 −1 Obviously f(x) is not continuous at x = 0.
    [Show full text]
  • Supersymmetric Path Integrals
    Communications in Commun. Math. Phys. 108, 605-629 (1987) Mathematical Physics © Springer-Verlag 1987 Supersymmetric Path Integrals John Lott* Department of Mathematics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Abstract. The supersymmetric path integral is constructed for quantum mechanical models on flat space as a supersymmetric extension of the Wiener integral. It is then pushed forward to a compact Riemannian manifold by means of a Malliavin-type construction. The relation to index theory is discussed. Introduction An interesting new branch of mathematical physics is supersymmetry. With the advent of the theory of superstrings [1], it has become important to analyze the quantum field theory of supersymmetric maps from R2 to a manifold. This should probably be done in a supersymmetric way, that is, based on the theory of supermanifolds, and in a space-time covariant way as opposed to the Hamiltonian approach. Accordingly, one wishes to make sense of supersymmetric path integrals. As a first step we study a simpler case, that of supersymmetric maps from R1 to a manifold, which gives supersymmetric quantum mechanics. As Witten has shown, supersymmetric quantum mechanics is related to the index theory of differential operators [2]. In this particular case of a supersymmetric field theory, the Witten index, which gives a criterion for dynamical supersymmetry breaking, is the ordinary index of a differential operator. If one adds the adjoint to the operator and takes the square, one obtains the Hamiltonian of the quantum mechanical theory. These indices can be formally computed by supersymmetric path integrals. For example, the Euler characteristic of a manifold M is supposed to be given by integrating e~L, with * Research supported by an NSF postdoctoral fellowship Current address: IHES, Bures-sur-Yvette, France 606 J.
    [Show full text]