Syracuse University SURFACE Writing Program – Dissertations College of Arts and Sciences 5-2013 (re)Constructing a Landmark: A Rhetorical Analysis of Brown v Board of Education at Fifty Christine A. Geyet Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/wp_etd Part of the Rhetoric Commons Recommended Citation Geyet, Christine A., "(re)Constructing a Landmark: A Rhetorical Analysis of Brown v Board of Education at Fifty" (2013). Writing Program – Dissertations. 35. https://surface.syr.edu/wp_etd/35 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Writing Program – Dissertations by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the landmark Brown v. Board of Education case on the occasion of its fiftieth anniversary with emphasis on its civic and social rhetorical functions. The analysis focuses on the two week period leading up to the fiftieth anniversary and the dedication of the Brown v Board of Education National Historic Site in Topeka. Data was gathered from various web sites related to the National Historic Site and the events in Topeka on the weekend it was dedicated, and from database records of national and international news sources. These materials were analyzed in three categories beginning with the Site itself and moving outward from Topeka to the national media response. The author argues that Brown functions in two ways that rival its function as law: first, as a tool of statecraft, a symbolic representation of America’s highest ideals around which community is built through epideictic performances; and second as a dialectic, a proposition around which there continues to be an asynchronous conversation on how to achieve, or continue to move toward, the promise of Brown.