Cubitus Varus Deformity – Rationale of Treatment and Methods
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Symposium International Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics 2015 July-Sep;1(1):26-29 Cubitus Varus Deformity – Rationale of Treatment and Methods Sandeep Patwardhan1, Ashok K Shyam1 Abstract Cubitus varus is commonest complication of paediatric supracondylar humerus fracture. These deformities are most commonly result of malunion, however avascular necrosis of trochlea or growth arrest of medial physis may also cause the deformity. Cubitus varus mostly presents as cosmetic deformity but it may also cause posterolateral instability, increased risk of secondary fractures, tardy ulna nerve palsy and snapping elbow. Current trend is to offer surgical correction for cubitus varus deformity in form of supracondylar osteotomy of the humerus. Various kinds of surgical approaches, osteotomy configuration and fixation methods are described in literature. The main guiding principles in deformity correction should be complete correction of sagittal varus deformity, correction of hyperextension deformity in older children. Rotational deformities may not be corrected but some authors do recommend triplanar correction. In our view lateral closed wedge oblique equal limb osteotomy fixed with reconstruction plate offers best results and is enough to treat most of the cubitus varus cases with minimal complication. Keywords: cubitus varus, osteotomy, complications. Introduction factors for malunion are: the clinical significance of the same is still Cubitus varus or gunstock deformity as it is 1. Impacted / comminuted type I debatable [a] Cosmetic appearance still is commonly known is the most common supracondylar fractures the most common cause why the parents complication of displaced supracondylar 2. Rotationally unstable type II fractures bring their child to clinician. The above fractures in children with an incidence treated in a cast with subsequent loss of mentioned complications along with ranging from 3% to 57% [1]. The deformity reduction cosmetic concerns justify surgical involves not only loss of coronal alignment 3. Poorly stabilised or reduced type III management, although many times this to make the distal forearm and hand deviate fractures or delayed neglected fractures deformity is neglected and patients are to the midline of the body ,but also has asymptomatic. In fact there are two of our recurvatum deformation in the sagittal Should we correct these deformities? colleagues (orthopaedic surgeons) who plane and internal rotation deformity in the The clinical presentation of a child with have cubitus varus deformities and they do axial plane. Recurvatum deformity is in the cubitus varus is usually an unsightly not wish to correct it. On the contrary they plane of motion of the joint and remodels deformity with a reasonably good ROM at mention that it is an advantage to them as well. The internal rotation deformity is the elbow. Although some studies have their rotational profile helps them to extend compensated by shoulder movements and reported asymmetrical flexion arc with their reach during surgery, specifically while is tolerated well. Both these deformities may limitation of elbow flexion range on affected operating on pelvi-acetabular fractures. not require corrections and most of the side [3] but functional arc was maintained. Thus, although the decision making tips times correction is focussed on coronal This led most authors to believe that the more in favour of surgical correction of plane deformity. deformity has no functional implications deformity, the treatment should be Malunion seems to the cause of the However studies have shown that long term individualised. deformity in majority of the cases, though follow up of children with cubitus varus may very rarely growth disturbances in trochlea result in a problems such as increased What surgeries are available? or avascular necrosis of trochlea may cause chances of lateral condyle fractures or other Most authors now recommend surgery in progression of the deformity. The causative secondary fractures, posterolateral elbow the form of corrective osteotomies to pain and instability, achieve a normal carrying angle. At times in 1Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and tardy ulnar nerve cases with physeal arrest in young child, Rehabilitation palsy [4-9]. There epiphyseiodesis is needed. 16, Shivajinagar, Pune, India. are some reports of Various types of osteotomies have been Address of Correspondence alteration in described each claiming improvements in Dr. Sandeep Patwardhan morphology and cosmesis as well as lesser complication rates Sancheti Institute for orthopaedics and alignment of the with their techniques. The osteotomies Rehabilitation Dr. Sandeep Dr. Ashok Shyam elbow joint in described are lateral closing wedge 16, Shivajinagar, Pune, India. Patwardhan cubitus varus, but osteotomy [10], French modified Email- [email protected] osteotomy [11], medial open wedge © 2015 by International Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics| Available on www.ijpoonline.com osteotomy [12], lateral oblique osteotomy (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. [13], lateral Equal limb osteotomy [14], step cut osteotomy [15], dome osteotomy 26 | International Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics | Volume 1 | Issue 1 | July-Sep 2015 | Page 26-29 Patwardhan S & Shyam AK www.ijpoonline.com [16,17], distraction osteogenesis [18,19]. using such complex procedures and have The main complications are lateral Many variations of these main techniques commented that rotational deformities need prominence, incomplete correction, loss of are reported in literature [20-27] but not be corrected at all [32]. The final correction, nerve palsies, infection and re- essential principles remain the same. The decision will depend on surgeons experience operations [33,34]. Lateral prominence was first osteotomy described by Siris was simple and choice. We believe a sagittal plane reported in French osteotomy due to lateral closed wedged osteotomy [10] which correction of varus by lateral closed wedge prominence of distal fragment laterally. An was modified by French to have intact osteotomy will be enough in most cases with equal limb oblique osteotomy minimises periosteal hinge and fixation with screws and addition of hyperextension correction in this issues. Medialisation of the distal tension looped steel wires [11]. This was older children. fragment may also reduce the lateral reported to have a lateral prominence which fragment prominence [27]. In a recently increased with increasing deformity. This What Fixation modalities to stabilise the published studies of French osteotomy it is was tackled by doing an oblique osteotomy osteotomy? pointed that the lateral prominence does with both arms slanting proximally from the Stabilisation methods vary from simple remodel in younger children (less than 11 medial epicondyle in such a way that the above elbow cast, k wires, single or double years of age) [35,36]. Dome and step cut contact dimensions of both proximal and cortical screw, Screws with tension wire osteotomies do not have issues of lateral distal ends are approximately same (equal loops, plates and external fixators [11-29]. prominence. limb osteotomy) [14]. A step – cut was Smooth K wires are reported to back out Incomplete Correction is generally a included by some to add stability, however it with loss of fixation and a threaded wire of complication of incomplete planning and simply adds more contact surface and helps Steinmann pin would be more appropriate. execution and is not a function of selecting in good healing [15]. Dome osteotomies can Wires should be used in younger child with the osteotomy. It is reported in 5.9% of correct large magnitude of varus but are smaller bone and should be used with patients [33] limited in rotational and extension postoperative cast support. In older child Loss of correction is a function of kind of deformity correction [17]. Three single or crossed screws can be used. osteotomy and type of fixation used. As dimensional osteotomies and ilizarov Inadvertent translation is a possibility while mentioned earlier screws with tension loop fixators are described by some authors but passing the screws and should be taken care wires will fail if the medial continued is has not gained wide clinical use [28,29]. of. Use of screws with tension band wire compromised. Similarly fixation with loop was proposed by French. This method smooth K wires have more chances of loss of When to do the Surgery? should be used only when the medial fixation. Surgery should be done only after allowing cortical and periosteal integrity is Nerve palsies have been reported in about for maximum remodelling. A rough estimate maintained [ie the osteotomy is not 2.5% of cases of cubitus varus correction will be around a year after the original injury. complete]. In cases where the osteotomy is osteotomies with decreasing frequencies of Again patients demands, growth potential complete this method may fail with chances involvement of ulnar, radial and median and status of physis should be taken into of loss of fixation. Also this method does not nerves [33]. Almost 78% of these palsies are account while planning surgery. allow rotational or translational correction. temporary and recover. Nerve injuries are Surgical Approach Osteotomies in older children may be more commonly seen in dome osteotomies Three surgical approaches are described stabilised