Historyczny Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego Instytut Archeologii Justyna

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Historyczny Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego Instytut Archeologii Justyna Wydział Filozoficzno – Historyczny Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego Instytut Archeologii Justyna Karolina Dworniak Wizerunek Medei w greckim malarstwie wazowym od VII do IV w. p.n.e. na podstawie zabytków archeologicznych występujących na terenach Etrurii, Attyki i Μεγάλη Ἑλλάς. Praca doktorska napisana pod kierunkiem prof. Ilony Skupińskiej – Løvset. Łódź 2017 Podziękowania Pragnę podziękować przede wszystkim mojemu opiekunowi i zarazem promotorowi Profesor Ilonie Skupińskiej- Løvset za umożliwienie mi napisania rozprawy doktorskiej pod swoimi auspicjami, a także za cenne rady i okazaną pomoc, jak również zachętę do pracy. Chciałabym podziękować Profesorowi Kazimierzowi Korusowi i Profesor Joannie Komorowskiej za cenne uwagi dotyczące kwestii filologicznych i literaturoznawczych. Podziękowania należą się także Annie Gębarowskiej za tłumaczenia z języka francuskiego. dr Ewie Kubiak, mgr Jadwidze Sieroń i Izabeli Rott za korektę językową i czas poświęcony na przeczytanie tak obszernego tekstu. Dziękuję również mgr Adamowi Jarychowi, który jako pierwszy zapoznał się z tekstem rozprawy i naniósł swoje poprawki oraz za okazaną cierpliwość i wsparcie na każdym etapie powstawania pracy. Specjalne podziękowania należą się moim Rodzicom za ich wiarę we mnie oraz mobilizację do działania – to Im dedykuję tę pracę. 2 Nota edytorska Termin „wazy‖ użyty w rozprawie jest określeniem zastosowanym w archeologii, oznaczającym każde naczynie, a zwłaszcza gliniane. Tym samym w rozprawie używam go wymiennie z nazwami danych wyrobów ceramicznych. Ponadto stosuję greckie terminy zapisane zarówno po polsku, grecku czy po łacinie, aby uniknąć powtórzeń. Dla zachowania klarowności tekstu używałam głównie rzeczowników pochodzących z języka greckiego i łacińskiego w nominatiwie liczby pojedynczej i mnogiej, z uwagi na fakt, że odmieniane słowa z tych języków brzmiały źle w momencie zestawienia ich z polską fonetyką. Skróty imion i dzieł autorów antycznych zostały podane na podstawie: H.G. Liddell, R. Scott, H.S. Jones, A Greek-English Lexicon, Oxford 1996 oraz Oxford Classical Dictionary, S. Hornblower, A. Spawforth, E. Eidinow (ed.), Oxford 2012. Część pracy została już opublikowana w formie artykułu: Innowacje mitograficzne za sprawą tragedii. Wpływ tragedii Eurypidesa na malarstwo wazowe w IV w. p.n.e., [w:] Innowacje w kulturze na przestrzeni dziejów, J. Kołat, A. Świerczek, S. Wyszogrodzka (red.), Kraków 2016. Oprócz przedstawień Medei, które zostały wyodrębnione w malarstwie wazowym, pojawiły się jej inne prezentacje, które nie były związane z żadną tradycją omówioną w dysertacji. Dlatego, żeby nie burzyć obranego schematu te wizerunki heroiny zostały umieszczone w tabeli na końcu pracy. 3 Spis treści Podziękowania………………………………………………………………………………………..2 Nota edytorska………………………………………………………………………………………...3 Wykaz skrótów użytych w pracy…………………………………………………………………...6 Wprowadzenie……………………………………………………………………………………….15 Rozdział I……………………………………………………………………………………………..23 Greckie źródła literackie do poznania mitu o Medei Rozdział II……………………………………………………………………………………………46 Medea i węże (δράκοντες) oraz Medea jako czarodziejka (φαρμακίς) – przedstawienie wizerunku Kolchijki w ikonografii malarstwa wazowego w VII w. p.n.e. z terenów Etrurii. Rozdział III…………………………………………………………………………………………...75 Wizerunek Medei w attyckim malarstwie wazowym od 530 r. p.n.e. do roku 420 p.n.e. 3.1. Medea i węże (δράκοντες) - kobieca głowa flankowana dwoma wężami…………...........77 3.2. Baran (κριός) i kocioł (λέβης) oraz Medea, Pelias i Peliady – czyli rytuał odmłodzenia..85 3.3. Medea jako gotująca ludzi (ἑψάνδρα) - motyw odmłodzenia Jazona lub Ajzona……..…142 Rozdział IV………………………………………………………………………………………….154 Ἀργὼ πᾶσι μέλουσα, παρ᾽ Αἰήταο πλέουσα – Argo znana wśród wszystkich czyli Medea, Jazon i Argonauci w attyckim malarstwie wazowym w latach 450 - 390 p.n.e 4.1. Kolchijska czarodziejka i śmierć Talosa…………………………………………………...…156 4.2. Medea i przybywający na Kolchidę Argonauci………………………………………….....172 Rozdział V…………………………………………………………………………………………..182 Mit Medei w malarstwie wazowym z terenów Wielkiej Grecji (Μεγάλη ἗λλάς) w latach 415 p.n.e. – 310 p.n.e. 5.1. Medea, Argonauci i smok z Kolchidy (Δρακων Κολχικος)………………………………..186 5.2. Medea, bovus i Jazon………………………………………………………………………...…208 5.3. Medea towarzysząca Jazonowi w przekazaniu złotego runa Peliasowi lub Ajetesowi...216 Rozdział VI………………………………………………………………………………………….220 Mit (Μῦθος) i tragedia (τραγῳδία) - Medea w attyckim i południowoitalskim malarstwie wazowym od II poł. V do końca IV w. p.n.e. Motywy ikonograficzne uwarunkowane wpływem tragedii 6.1. Medea jako królowa Aten – czyli czarodziejka, Tezeusz, byk i Aigeus. Malarstwo attyckie i południowoitalskie……………………………………………………………………...224 6.2. Medea jako królowa Aten – rozpoznanie Tezeusza przez Aigeusa……………………....251 4 6.3. Apoteoza (Αποθέωσις) Medei oraz rydwan Heliosa – ucieczka Kolchijki przed gniewem Jazona………………………………………………………………………………………………...256 6.4. Zemsta Medei – czarodziejka, Kreuza i Kreon………………………………………….......268 6.5.Medea jako dzieciobójczyni (παιδολέτειρα)……………………………………………...….272 Zakończenie……………………………………………………………………………………….. 283 Apendix…………………………………………………………………………………………...…..298 Tabela 1 - Greckie źródła literackie do poznania mitu o Medei od VIII w. p.n.e. do II w. n.e…………………………………………………………………………………………………….298 Tabela 2 - Motywy w malarstwie wazowym i ich korelacje ze źródłami literackimi…………………………………………………………………………………………...300 Tabela 3 - Zabytki archeologiczne przedstawione w pracy………………………………...….303 a. Katalog zabytków pochodzące z etruskich manufaktur……………………………….303 b. Katalog zabytków pochodzące z attyckich manufaktur. ……………………………...304 c. Katalog zabytków pochodzące z manufaktur znajdujących się na terenie Megale Hellas……………………………………………………………………………………..…312 Tabela 4 - Katalog zabytków malarstwa wazowego, których sceny z Medeą nawiązują do innej tradycji……………………………………………………………………………………..….319 Bibliografia……………………………………………………………………………….………….321 Źródła ilustracji…………………………………………………………………………………..…351 5 Skróty użyte w pracy Autorzy antyczni Acus. = Acusilaus Alcm. = Alcman Alex. Thrall. = Alexander Thrallinus Medicus Febr. = De febribus Antiph. = Antiphanes Antipho. = Antipho Antim. = Antimachus Eleg. = Fragmenta Elegiaca Anth. Pal. = Athologia Palatina Apollod. = Apollodorus Bib. = Bibliotheca Epit. = Epitome Apul. = Apuleius Met. = Metamorphosis A.R. = Apollonius Rhodius Arg. = Argonautica Ar. = Aristophanes Ec. = Ecclesiazusae Eq. = Equites Lys. = Lysistrata Pax Pl. = Plutus Ra. = Ranae 6 Arist. = Aristoteles Reth. = Rethorica Ath. = Athenaeus Call. = Callimach Aet. = Aetia Hec. = Hecale Canthar. = Cantharus Cic. = Marcus Tullius Cicero leg. Man. = pro lege Manilia ND = de Natura Deorum Sen. = De Senectute Clem. Alex. = Clemens Alexandrinus Strom. = Stromateis Cleon Sic. = Cleon Siculus Lyricus Dicaeog. = Dicaeogenes Dinol. = Dinolochus D.S. = Diodorus Siculus Diog. Ath. = Diogenes Atheniensis D.L. = Diogenes Laertius Dion. Mit. = Dionysius Mitylaenensis Diph. = Diphilus Drac. = Dracontius Med. = Medea Epich. = Epicharmus Erot. = Erotianus Etym. Mag. = Etymologicum Magnum Eub. = Eubulos 7 Eur. = Eurypides Alc. = Alcestis Bacch. = Bacchae Med. = Medea Eumel. = Eumelus Gp. = Geoponica Hdt. = Herodotus Hecat. = Hecataeus Hellanic. = Hellanicus Hermesian. = Hermesianax Herodor. = Herodorus Hes. = Hesiodus Th. = Theogonia Sc. = Scutum Herculis Op. = Opera et Dies Hipp. = Hippys Hom. = Homerus Od. = Odyssea Il. = Ilias Hor. = Horace Carm. = Carmina Sat. = Satirae Hyg. = Hyginus Fab. = Fabulae Poet. astr. = Poetica astronomica Ibyc. = Ibycus Joseph. = Josephus 8 BJ = Bellum Judaicum Liv. = Livius Lykoph. = Lykophron Alex. = Alexandra Macr. = Macrobius Sat. = Saturnalia Mart. = Martialis Melanth. = Melanthius Mimn. = Mimnermus Myrsil. = Myrsilus Myth. Vat. = Mythographi Vaticani Neophr. = Neophron Orph. = Orphica A. = Argonautica Ov. = Ovidius Her. = Heroides Met. = Methamorphoses Tr. = Tristia Palaeph. = Palaephatus Paus. = Pausanias Pherecr. = Pherecrates Pherecyd. = Pherecydes Philostr. = Philostratus Ep. = Epistualae Her. = Heroicus Philostr. = Philostratus Imag. = Imagines 9 Phryn. = Phrynihus PS. = Praeparatio Sophistica Pi. = Pindarus P. = Pythian Odes O. = Olympian Odes Nem. = Nemean Odes Pl. = Plato Chrm. = Charmides Euthd.= Euthydemus Smp. = Symposium Plaut. = Plautus Pseud. = Pseudolus Plin. = Plinius Maior NH. = Naturalis Historia Plu. = Plutarchus Cim. = Cimon Cons. Ap. = Consolatio ad Apollonium Poll. = Pollux Porphyr. = Porphyrius Rhinth. = Rhinthon schol. in A.R. = scholia in Apollonii Rhodii Argonautica schol. Ar. = scholia in Aristophanem schol. in Ar. Eq. = scholia in Aristophanis Equites schol. Ar. Pl. = scholia ad Aristophanis Plutus schol. in Eur. Med. = scholia in Euripidem Medea schol. in Pl. = scholia in Platonis schol. in Il. = scholia Greaca in Homeri Iliadem 10 schol. ad Lykoph. = scholia ad Lykophronem schol. in Pind. Ol. = scholia vetera in Pindari carmina (scholia in Olympionicas) Simon. = Simonides S. = Sophocles Fr. Fragmenta Stob. = Stobaeus Flor. = Florilegium Str. = Strabon Geog. = Geographica Suid. = Suidas, Lexicon Theoc. = Theocritus Thuc. = Thucydides Val. Flacc. = Valerius Flaccus Arg. = Argonautica Varro = Varron Rust. = de re Rustica Verg. = Vergilius Georg. = Georgica Xen. = Xenophon Anab. = Anabasis Hell. = Hellenica Zen. = Zenobius Czasopisma i wydania zbiorowe AA = Archäologischer Anzeiger ABV = J.D. Beazley, Attic Black-Figure Vase-Painters, Oxford 1956 Addenda = L. Burn, R. Glynn, Beazley Addenda, Additional References to
Recommended publications
  • The Hellenic Saga Gaia (Earth)
    The Hellenic Saga Gaia (Earth) Uranus (Heaven) Oceanus = Tethys Iapetus (Titan) = Clymene Themis Atlas Menoetius Prometheus Epimetheus = Pandora Prometheus • “Prometheus made humans out of earth and water, and he also gave them fire…” (Apollodorus Library 1.7.1) • … “and scatter-brained Epimetheus from the first was a mischief to men who eat bread; for it was he who first took of Zeus the woman, the maiden whom he had formed” (Hesiod Theogony ca. 509) Prometheus and Zeus • Zeus concealed the secret of life • Trick of the meat and fat • Zeus concealed fire • Prometheus stole it and gave it to man • Freidrich H. Fuger, 1751 - 1818 • Zeus ordered the creation of Pandora • Zeus chained Prometheus to a mountain • The accounts here are many and confused Maxfield Parish Prometheus 1919 Prometheus Chained Dirck van Baburen 1594 - 1624 Prometheus Nicolas-Sébastien Adam 1705 - 1778 Frankenstein: The Modern Prometheus • Novel by Mary Shelly • First published in 1818. • The first true Science Fiction novel • Victor Frankenstein is Prometheus • As with the story of Prometheus, the novel asks about cause and effect, and about responsibility. • Is man accountable for his creations? • Is God? • Are there moral, ethical constraints on man’s creative urges? Mary Shelly • “I saw the pale student of unhallowed arts kneeling beside the thing he had put together. I saw the hideous phantasm of a man stretched out, and then, on the working of some powerful engine, show signs of life, and stir with an uneasy, half vital motion. Frightful must it be; for supremely frightful would be the effect of any human endeavour to mock the stupendous mechanism of the Creator of the world” (Introduction to the 1831 edition) Did I request thee, from my clay To mould me man? Did I solicit thee From darkness to promote me? John Milton, Paradise Lost 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Thyestes, Acts 1 and 2
    Archived at the Flinders Academic Commons: http://dspace.flinders.edu.au/dspace/ Daalder, J. (Ed.). (1982). Thyestes (J. Heywood, Trans.) (New Mermaids series). London: Ernest Benn Limited. Copyright (1982) Ernest Benn Limited. Published version of the text reproduced here with permission from the editor and the publisher. Personal use of this material is permitted. that to reprint/republish this material for Please note advertising or promotional purposes, or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works, permission must be obtained from the editor and the publisher. I vi SE~ECAIHEYWOOD If L. A N. S e N E C A E CHORVS. Anaporfrici,pra-ur unum & alrcrum Adonlum. vo tm.trurn,{uprrionq; parrns, Q Cuius ttd ort us noCl1s opac~C Dtc~M omnr fogit,quo Ut'rtls rtt"rf J..'itdioq; dmn pnd1s Olympof Cur Phcxbe tuos .rapls aJPcCl~Mf :Nondum {ru.nuntiuf bor~C N ott urn auocat .lumina urjptr. ·.~~ fa)cnrra rnhtulrb ~hp~ Non®m Htf1mi.~:flrxur~t rot~ rftrs fdUbfullr 4'n;h1 Jubtt cmrricos {olun-e CU7Tu5. (brb bP }afprr ""'~ :N ond&~m in r.oflrm urrgrntr die tDool' frlfotut of Tttti.t mifit buccin11 fignum. 3:1Coln£ .Cob Stupct ad {ubit~C ttmpord cCXM lcgt Non dum fofTu bub~M 4Tdtor. CR _,JfOJble QEid tt td'rtio ptpulit c:ur{u! Qg.c C.tU{4 tUOJ finUtt CrTtO Driedt equosfnunquid dperto IMPRINTED AT Cdl'ure DitJ) uiCli,trntztnt konbon an 1lrtrftncc BeUd gigdntcstnunquid Tit''" an tbr bf»ae lata Pettore fiffo rrncuat uetms C[bomae 15tr:; Saucitu ir.t~fnum reidlo r~dcUt8.
    [Show full text]
  • Female Characters, Female Sympathetic Choruses, and the “Suppression” of Antiphonal Lament at the Openings of Euripides’ Phaethon, Andromeda, and Hypsipyle*
    FRAMMENTI SULLA SCENA (ONLINE) Studi sul dramma antico frammentario Università deGli Studi di Torino Centro Studi sul Teatro Classico http://www.ojs.unito.it/index.php/fss www.teatroclassico.unito.it ISSN 2612-3908 1 • 2020 FEMALE CHARACTERS, FEMALE SYMPATHETIC CHORUSES, AND THE “SUPPRESSION” OF ANTIPHONAL LAMENT AT THE OPENINGS OF EURIPIDES’ PHAETHON, ANDROMEDA, AND HYPSIPYLE* VASILIKI KOUSOULINI NATIONAL AND KAPODISTRIAN UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS [email protected] Female choruses abound in Euripides’ plays.1 While there are many in his extant plays, we also encounter choruses of women in his fragmentary ones.2 Little attention has been paid to the existence of sympathetic female choruses in Euripides’ fragmentary dramas and their in- teraction with female characters. A sympathetic female chorus seems to appear in conjunction with a female character in many Euripidean fragmentary plays. The chorus of the Alexander in * This research is co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Social Fund- ESF) through the Opera- tional ProGramme «Human Resources Development, Education and LifelonG LearninG» in the context of the pro- ject “Reinforcement of Postdoctoral Researchers - 2nd Cycle” (MIS-5033021), implemented by the State Scholar- ships Foundation (ΙΚΥ). 1 There is a female chorus in Euripides’ Medea, Hippolytus, Andromache, Hecuba, Suppliant Women, Ion, Electra, Trojan Women, Iphigenia among the Taurians, Helen, Phoenician Women, Orestes, Iphigenia in Aulis, and Bacchae. Mastronarde observed that there are 15 male choruses, 62 female choruses, and 105 choruses with undetermined gender in Euripides’ corpus. Cf. MASTRONARDE 2010, 103. AccordinG to Calame, the 82% of Euripides’ traGic choruses con- sists of women. Cf. CALAME 2020, 776.
    [Show full text]
  • Teknophagy and Tragicomedy: the Mythic Burlesques of Tereus and Thyestes
    This is a repository copy of Teknophagy and Tragicomedy: The Mythic Burlesques of Tereus and Thyestes. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/126374/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Haley, M orcid.org/0000-0002-7697-3568 (2018) Teknophagy and Tragicomedy: The Mythic Burlesques of Tereus and Thyestes. Ramus, 47 (2). pp. 152-173. ISSN 0048-671X https://doi.org/10.1017/rmu.2018.12 © Ramus 2019. This article has been published in a revised form in Ramus: https://doi.org/10.1017/rmu.2018.12. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Ramus Submission 2017 Teknophagy and Tragicomedy: The Mythic Burlesques of Tereus and Thyestes Teknophagy (τεκνοφαγία), or child-eating, is an apt subject for tragedy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Medea of Euripides and Seneca: a Comparison
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1941 The Medea of Euripides and Seneca: A Comparison Mary Enrico Frisch Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the Classics Commons Recommended Citation Frisch, Mary Enrico, "The Medea of Euripides and Seneca: A Comparison" (1941). Master's Theses. 180. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/180 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1941 Mary Enrico Frisch -If.. THE MEDEA OF EURIPIDES AND SENECA: A COMPARISON by Sister Mary Enrico Frisch, S.S.N.D. A Thesis submitted 1n partial ~ul~illment o~ the requirements ~or the degree o~ Master o~ Arts Loyola University August, 1941 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I Introduction: Survey o~ Opinion. 1 II Broad Similarities in Moti~ and 6 Sentiment. III Broad Similarities in the Plot 30 o~ the Medea o~ Euripides and the Medea o~ Seneca. IV Parallels in Phraseology. 51 v Characters and Their Attitude 73 to the Gods. Bibliography a. Re~erences ~or the Medea 91 o~ Euripides. b. Re~erences ~or the Medea 95 o~ Seneca. c. General Works. 98 THE MEDEA OF EURIPIDES AND SENECA: A COMPARISON Chapter I INTRODUCTION: SURVEY OF OPINION It is not a new theory that Seneca used the plays o~ Eurip­ ides as models for his Latin tragedies, particularly his Medea, Hippolytus, Hercules Furens, Troades and the Phoenissae.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT a Director's Approach to Euripides' Hecuba Christopher F. Peck, M.F.A. Mentor: Deanna Toten Beard, Ph.D. This Thesi
    ABSTRACT A Director’s Approach to Euripides’ Hecuba Christopher F. Peck, M.F.A. Mentor: DeAnna Toten Beard, Ph.D. This thesis explores a production of Euripides’ Hecuba as it was directed by Christopher Peck. Chapter One articulates a unique Euripidean dramatic structure to demonstrate the contemporary viability of Euripides’ play. Chapter Two utilizes this dramatic structure as the basis for an aggressive analysis of themes inherent in the production. Chapter Three is devoted to the conceptualization of this particular production and the relationship between the director and the designers in pursuit of this concept. Chapter Four catalogs the rehearsal process and how the director and actors worked together to realize the dramatic needs of the production. Finally Chapter Five is a postmortem of the production emphasizing the strengths and weaknesses of the final product of Baylor University’s Hecuba. A Director's Approach to Euripides' Hecuba by Christopher F. Peck, B.F.A A Thesis Approved by the Department of Theatre Arts Stan C. Denman, Ph.D., Chairperson Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Baylor University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Fine Arts Approved by the Thesis Committee DeAnna Toten Beard, Ph.D., Chairperson David J. Jortner, Ph.D. Marion D. Castleberry, Ph.D. Steven C. Pounders, M.F.A. Christopher J. Hansen, M.F.A. Accepted by the Graduate School May 2013 J. Larry Lyon, Ph.D., Dean Page bearing signatures is kept on file in the Graduate School. Copyright © 2013 by Christopher F. Peck
    [Show full text]
  • Second Thoughts in Greek Tragedy Knox, Bernard M W Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Fall 1966; 7, 3; Proquest Pg
    Second Thoughts in Greek Tragedy Knox, Bernard M W Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Fall 1966; 7, 3; ProQuest pg. 215 Second Thoughts in Greek Tragedy Bernard M. W. Knox "IN HUMAN LIFE," says the Nurse in Euripides' Hippolytus (435-6), "second thoughts are somehow wiser." Like many another character in Euripidean tragedy, she has just changed her mind, and, in true Euripidean style, she justifies her action with a generaliza­ tion. It is not a generalization which would have recommended itself to Aeschylus and Sophocles; before Euripides, change of mind is a rare phenomenon on the tragic stage.! Aeschylus, as Bruno Snell has demonstrated, broke new ground in Greek poetry with his explicit presentation of a conscious human choice between alternatives, a free human decision which commits its taker to a tragic course.2 The responsibility the hero thus assumes, and the complex relation of his choice to the will of the gods and his own heredity, allow little scope for a change of mind. Aeschylean drama is linear; its principal figures, their decision once made, pursue their chosen course to the bitter end.3 In the Persians, which is the tragedy of a whole people rather than an individual, and which furthermore works through retrospect and prophecy rather than through present action, a change of mind is excluded by the nature of the dramatic organization. In the Seven against Thebes, Eteocles, at the end of a slow, almost static, preparation, makes his swift decision to fight against his brother; it is a decision, but not a change of mind-he had already decided to fight in person at one of the gates (282) and the gate where Polynices awaits him is the last remaining assignment.
    [Show full text]
  • Alcmaeon in Psophis
    Alcmaeon in Psophis Psophis was said to have been originally called Erymanthus, and its territory to have been ravaged by the Erymanthian Boar.Pausanias, "Description of Greece" viii. 24. § 2-10] [Hecat. "on Stephanus of Byzantium s.v." polytonic|Ψωφίς] [Apollodorus, ii. Alcmaeon (mythology) â” In Greek mythology, Alcmaeon, or Alkmáon, was the son of Amphiaraus and Eriphyle. As one of the Epigoni, he was a leader of the Argives who attacked Thebes, taking the city in retaliation for the deaths of their fathers, the Seven Against Thebes ⦠Alcmaeon in Psophis. Year: between 180 and 200 AD. Scripts: Alcmaeon in Psophis by Euripides. Genres: Tragedy. Psophis. How to cite this ancient performance. Alcmaeon in Psophis, accessed at http://www.apgrd.ox.ac.uk/ancient- performance/performance/98 <16 September 2018>. Alcmaeon in Psophis (Ancient Greek: Ἀλκμαίων ὠδιὰ Ψωφῖδος, AlkmaiÅn ho dia Psophidos) is a play by Athenian playwright Euripides. The play has been lost except for a few surviving fragments. It was first produced in 438 BCE in a tetralogy that also included the extant Alcestis and the lost Cretan Women and Telephus. The story is believed to have incorporated the death of Argive hero Alcmaeon.[1]. Alcmaeon in Psophis. Alcmaeon (mythology)'s wiki: In Greek mythology, Alcmaeon (Greek: Ἀλκμαίων), was the son of Amphiaraus and Eriphyle. As one of the Epigoni, he was a leader of the Argives who attacked Thebes, taking the city in retaliation for the deaths of their fathers, the Seven Against Thebes, wh.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Medea in Greece and Rome
    INTRODUCTION: MEDEA IN GREECE AND ROME A J. Boyle maiusque mari Medea malum. Seneca Medea 362 And Medea, evil greater than the sea. Few mythic narratives of the ancient world are more famous than the story of the Colchian princess/sorceress who betrayed her father and family for love of a foreign adventurer and who, when abandoned for another woman, killed in revenge both her rival and her children. Many critics have observed the com­ plexities and contradictions of the Medea figure—naive princess, knowing witch, faithless and devoted daughter, frightened exile, marginalised alien, dis­ placed traitor to family and state, helper-màiden, abandoned wife, vengeful lover, caring and filicidal mother, loving and fratricidal sister, oriental 'other', barbarian saviour of Greece, rejuvenator of the bodies of animals and men, killer of kings and princesses, destroyer and restorer of kingdoms, poisonous stepmother, paradigm of beauty and horror, demi-goddess, subhuman monster, priestess of Hecate and granddaughter of the sun, bride of dead Achilles and ancestor of the Medes, rider of a serpent-drawn chariot in the sky—complex­ ities reflected in her story's fragmented and fragmenting history. That history has been much examined, but, though there are distinguished recent exceptions, comparatively little attention has been devoted to the specifically 'Roman' Medea—the Medea of the Republican tragedians, of Cicero, Varro Atacinus, Ovid, the younger Seneca, Valerius Flaccus, Hosidius Geta and Dracontius, and, beyond the literary field, the Medea of Roman painting and Roman sculp­ ture. Hence the present volume of Ramus, which aims to draw attention to the complex and fascinating use and abuse of this transcultural heroine in the Ro­ man intellectual and visual world.
    [Show full text]
  • Actors on High: the Skene Roof, the Crane, and the Gods in Attic Drama
    UC Berkeley Classical Papers Title Actors on High: The Skene Roof, the Crane, and the Gods in Attic Drama Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/61w4628m Author Mastronarde, Donald J. Publication Date 1990-10-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Published as “Actors on High: The Skene Roof, the Crane, and the Gods in Attic Drama” in Classical Antiquity Volume 9, No. 2, October 1990, pages 247-294, ©1990 by The Regents of the University of California. Copying and Permissions notice: Authorization to copy this content beyond fair use (as specified in Sections 107 and 108 of the U. S. Copyright Law) for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by the Regents of the University of California for libraries and other users, provided that they are registered with and pay the specified fee via Rightslink® on Caliber (http://caliber.ucpress.net/) or directly with the Copyright Clearance Center, http://www.copyright.com. [247]DONALD J. MASTRONARDE ACTORS ON HIGH: THE SKENE ROOF, THE CRANE, AND THE GODS IN ATTIC DRAMA* Many recent studies of Greek tragedy and comedy have shown a special interest in staging, not only with a view to antiquarian accuracy, but also in order to assess the playwrights’ techniques and skills in manipulating the visual elements of the performance for dramatic effect.1 The present study addresses a particularly controversial aspect of staging, the appearance of actors “on high.” It is generally agreed that the crane was available in the late fifth century, and it is also widely assumed that the wooden skene building of the late fifth and early fourth centuries had a flat roof, at least a part of which could serve as an additional acting space.
    [Show full text]
  • Iphigenia in Tauris. Translated by Anna Swanwick
    rPT idZt> . 3 U.c HANDY LITERAL TRANSLATIONS. 90 VOLUMES " To one who is reading the Classics, a literal translation ts a con- ietit and legitimate help: .... and every -well-informed person itnU d th' Classics eithr.r in the original or in a translation.*' Caesar's Gallic War. The 7 Books Demosthenes' Olynthiacs, Philippics Caesar's Civil War Euripides' Alcestis, and hlectra Catullus Euripides'Bacchantes, Herc.Furens Cirero's Brutus Euripides' Hecuba, and Andromache Cicero's Defense of Roscius Euripides' I phig. In Aulis, In Tauris Cicero De Officiis Euripides' Medea Cicero On Old Age and Friendship Herodotus, Books VI and VII Cicero On Oratory Herodotus, Book VIII Cicero On the Nature of the Gads Homer's Iliad, tke 1st Six Bookt Cicero's Select Orations Homer's Odyssey, fst 12 Bookt Cicero's Select Letters. 2 rr>ts. Lucian's Select Dialogues, 2 volt. Cicero's Tusculan Disputations Lysias' Orations Cornelius Nepos, complete Plato's Apology, Crito, and Phaedo Eutropius Plato's Gorgias Horace, complete Plato's Inches (paper) Satires, eompUtt Plato's Protagoras, Euthyphroa tivenal'sivy. Books I and II Plato's Republic Uvy. Books XXI and XXII Sophocles' O7-d. Tyr. F.Iec., Antig O 'id's Metamorphoses, a voli. Thucydides, Books I-IV Phzdrjis' Fables Thucydides, Books V-VIII Plautus Captivi, and Mostelaria Xenophno's Anabasis, rst 4 Btokt Pbuius'Pseudolus; Miles Gloriosus Xenophon's Cyropaedia, 2 volumet Plant us'Trinummus.and Mensechmi Xenophon's Hqllenica, Symposium Pliny s Select Letters. 2 To/umes Xenophon's Memorabilia, compUt* Quintilian Books X and XII Roman Life in Lat.
    [Show full text]
  • Euripides and Gender: the Difference the Fragments Make
    Euripides and Gender: The Difference the Fragments Make Melissa Karen Anne Funke A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2013 Reading Committee: Ruby Blondell, Chair Deborah Kamen Olga Levaniouk Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Classics © Copyright 2013 Melissa Karen Anne Funke University of Washington Abstract Euripides and Gender: The Difference the Fragments Make Melissa Karen Anne Funke Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Ruby Blondell Department of Classics Research on gender in Greek tragedy has traditionally focused on the extant plays, with only sporadic recourse to discussion of the many fragmentary plays for which we have evidence. This project aims to perform an extensive study of the sixty-two fragmentary plays of Euripides in order to provide a picture of his presentation of gender that is as full as possible. Beginning with an overview of the history of the collection and transmission of the fragments and an introduction to the study of gender in tragedy and Euripides’ extant plays, this project takes up the contexts in which the fragments are found and the supplementary information on plot and character (known as testimonia) as a guide in its analysis of the fragments themselves. These contexts include the fifth- century CE anthology of Stobaeus, who preserved over one third of Euripides’ fragments, and other late antique sources such as Clement’s Miscellanies, Plutarch’s Moralia, and Athenaeus’ Deipnosophistae. The sections on testimonia investigate sources ranging from the mythographers Hyginus and Apollodorus to Apulian pottery to a group of papyrus hypotheses known as the “Tales from Euripides”, with a special focus on plot-type, especially the rape-and-recognition and Potiphar’s wife storylines.
    [Show full text]