INSTITUTIONAL REPRESENTATIVENESS of TRADE UNIONS and EMPLOYERS’ ORGANISATIONS in the “CENTRAL PUBLIC SERVICES” Project No VT/2002/0215

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

INSTITUTIONAL REPRESENTATIVENESS of TRADE UNIONS and EMPLOYERS’ ORGANISATIONS in the “CENTRAL PUBLIC SERVICES” Project No VT/2002/0215 UNIVERSITE CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN Institut des Sciences du Travail INSTITUTIONAL REPRESENTATIVENESS OF TRADE UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS’ ORGANISATIONS IN THE “CENTRAL PUBLIC SERVICES” Project No VT/2002/0215 July 2004 Research project conducted on behalf of the of the Employment and Social Affairs Directorate- General of the European Commission National experts: Austria: Franz Traxler, Institut für Soziologie – Universität Wien Belgium: Jean Vandewattyne, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) Denmark: Carsten Jorgensen, Forskningscenter for Arbejdsmarkeds- og Organisationsstudier, FAOS – Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen Finland: Pekka Ylostalo, University of Helsinki, Department of Sociology France: Anne-Marie Grozelier, Forum Social Européen and Marinette Mormont, Institut des Sciences du Travail (UCL) Germany: Dieter Sadowski and Catherine Leillich, IAAEG – Universität Trier Greece: Aliki Mouriki, National Center for Social Research – Athens Ireland: Pauline Conroy, Ralaheen Ltd Italy: Manuela Galetto and Franca Alacevich, Università degli studi di Firenze – Dipartemento di scienza della politica e sociologia politica Luxembourg: Franz Clement, Centre d’Études de Populations, de Pauvreté et de Politiques Socio-Economiques (CEPS – INSTEAD) Netherlands: Chris Moll, Marc van der Meer and Jelle Visser, Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies, University of Amsterdam Portugal: Marinus Pires de Lima, Universidade de Lisboa – Instituto de Ciências Sociais – Instituto Superior de Ciências do Trabalho e da Empresa (ISCTE) Spain: Ramon De Alos-Moner Vila, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona – Grup d’Estudis Sociologic sobre la Vida Quotidiana i el Treball United Kingdom: David Marsden, London School of Economics Sweden: Dominique Anxo, Center for European Labour Market Studies (CELMS) – Department of Economics – Göteborg University Institut des Sciences du Travail – UCL : Author: Marinette Mormont Research Team: Prof. Armand Spineux Prof. Pierre Reman Catherine Delbar, coordination Olivier Hoff, researcher Alexandre Chaidron, researcher Administrative coordination: Marie-Anne Saussu 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................................... 6 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................. 7 CONTEXT OF THE STUDY...................................................................................................................................... 7 THE NATIONAL SUMMARY REPORTS..................................................................................................................... 9 THE CENTRAL PUBLIC SECTOR IN THE EU........................................................................................... 10 THE CENTRAL PUBLIC SERVICES SECTOR ........................................................................................................... 10 THE SOCIAL DIALOGUE ...................................................................................................................................... 15 THE EUROPEAN TRADE UNION ORGANISATIONS AND THEIR AFFILIATES ............................................................ 18 TRADE UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS IN THE MEMBER STATES ................................................................................ 26 AUSTRIA............................................................................................................................................................. 28 DELIMITATION OF THE SECTOR .......................................................................................................................... 28 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SECTOR .................................................................................................................... 28 SOCIAL DIALOGUE IN THE SECTOR ..................................................................................................................... 29 REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYERS .................................................................................................................... 29 WORKERS’ ORGANISATIONS .............................................................................................................................. 29 BELGIUM ........................................................................................................................................................... 31 DELIMITATION OF THE SECTOR .......................................................................................................................... 31 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SECTOR .................................................................................................................... 32 SOCIAL DIALOGUE IN THE SECTOR ..................................................................................................................... 32 ELEMENTS RELATING TO EMPLOYERS ................................................................................................................ 33 WORKERS’ ORGANISATIONS .............................................................................................................................. 34 DENMARK ......................................................................................................................................................... 36 DELIMITATION OF THE SECTOR .......................................................................................................................... 36 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SECTOR .................................................................................................................... 36 SOCIAL DIALOGUE IN THE SECTOR ..................................................................................................................... 37 REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYERS .................................................................................................................... 38 WORKERS’ ORGANISATIONS .............................................................................................................................. 38 FINLAND ............................................................................................................................................................ 41 DELIMITATION OF THE SECTOR .......................................................................................................................... 41 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SECTOR .................................................................................................................... 41 SOCIAL DIALOGUE IN THE SECTOR ..................................................................................................................... 41 REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYERS .................................................................................................................... 42 WORKERS’ ORGANISATIONS .............................................................................................................................. 42 FRANCE.............................................................................................................................................................. 45 DELIMITATION OF THE SECTOR .......................................................................................................................... 45 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SECTOR .................................................................................................................... 45 3 SOCIAL DIALOGUE IN THE SECTOR ..................................................................................................................... 46 REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYERS .................................................................................................................... 47 WORKERS’ ORGANISATIONS .............................................................................................................................. 47 GERMANY ......................................................................................................................................................... 50 DELIMITATION OF THE SECTOR .......................................................................................................................... 50 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SECTOR .................................................................................................................... 50 SOCIAL DIALOGUE IN THE SECTOR ..................................................................................................................... 51 REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYERS .................................................................................................................... 51 WORKERS’ ORGANISATIONS .............................................................................................................................. 52 GREECE.............................................................................................................................................................. 54 DELIMITATION OF THE SECTOR .......................................................................................................................... 54 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SECTOR .................................................................................................................... 54 SOCIAL DIALOGUE IN THE SECTOR ....................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • UNISON and GMB Pay Claim for 2020/21 Contains Confidential Or
    Report Title: UNISON and GMB pay claim for 2020/21 Contains Confidential or No - Part I , except appendix C Part II Not Exempt Information? for publication by virtue of paragraph 3 of part 1 of the Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972. Member reporting: Cllr S Rayner, Lead Member for HR, Legal, ICT, Resident and Leisure Services, Performance Management and Windsor Meeting and Date: Employment and Member Standards Panel - 12 November 2019 Responsible Officer(s): Duncan Sharkey, Managing Director and Nikki Craig, Head of HR, Corporate Projects and ICT Wards affected: None REPORT SUMMARY 1. This report deals with the annual pay claim submitted by UNISON and GMB trade unions (Appendix A). Their claim covers all staff on local terms and conditions, including the Corporate Leadership Team and Managing Director. 2. It recommends that Employment Panel reviews and considers the information provided in relation to any pay increase being applied from April 2020. 3. These recommendations are being made as part of a local agreement the Council has with its recognised trade unions, allowing them to annually propose an increase for non-school based staff. 4. The financial implications of these proposals are set out in section 4.2. 1. DETAILS OF RECOMMENDATION(S) RECOMMENDATION: That Employment and Member Standards Panel notes the report and: i) Reviews the trade union pay claim and the supplementary information supplied as part of the consideration of the annual pay review for eligible staff for 2020/21. 2. REASON(S) FOR RECOMMENDATION(S) AND OPTIONS CONSIDERED Options Table 1: Options arising from this report Option Comments Consider the pay claim submitted by This request forms part of the annual the trade unions.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 11 All India and Central Services
    UNIT 11 ALL INDIA AND CENTRAL SERVICES Structure 1 1.0 Objectives 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Historical Development 1 1.3 Constitution of All India Services 1 1.3.1 Indian Administrative Service 1 1.3.2 Indian Police Service 1 1.3.3 Indian Forest Service 1 1.4 Importance of Indian Administrative Service 1 1.5 Recruitment of All India Services 1 1.5.1 Training of All India Services Personnel 1 1 5.2 Cadre Management 1 1.6 Need for All India Services 1 1.7 Central Services 1 1.7.1 Recwihent 1 1.7.2 Tra~ningand Cadre Management 1 1.7.3 Indian Foreign Service 1 1.8 Let Us Sum Up 1 1.9 Key Words 1 1.10 References and Further Readings 1 1.1 1 Answers to Check Your Progregs Exercises r 1.0 OBJECTIVES 'lfter studying this Unit you should be able to: Explain the historical development, importance and need of the All India Services; Discuss the recruitment and training methods of the All India Seryice; and Through light on the classification, recruitment and training of the Central Civil Services. 11.1 INTRODUCTION A unique feature of the Indian Administration system, is the creation of certain services common to both - the Centre and the States, namely, the All India Services. These are composed of officers who are in the exclusive employment of neither Centre nor the States, and may at any time be at the disposal of either. The officers of these Services are recruited on an all-India basis with common qualifications and uniform scales of pay, and notwithstanding their division among the States, each of them forms a single service with a common status and a common standard of rights and remuneration.
    [Show full text]
  • Governing Body 323Rd Session, Geneva, 12–27 March 2015 GB.323/INS/5/Appendix III
    INTERNATIONAL LABOUR OFFICE Governing Body 323rd Session, Geneva, 12–27 March 2015 GB.323/INS/5/Appendix III Institutional Section INS Date: 13 March 2015 Original: English FIFTH ITEM ON THE AGENDA The Standards Initiative – Appendix III Background document for the Tripartite Meeting on the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87), in relation to the right to strike and the modalities and practices of strike action at national level (revised) (Geneva, 23–25 February 2015) Contents Page Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Decision on the fifth item on the agenda: The standards initiative: Follow-up to the 2012 ILC Committee on the Application of Standards .................. 1 Part I. ILO Convention No. 87 and the right to strike ..................................................................... 3 I. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3 II. The Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87) ......................................................................... 3 II.1. Negotiating history prior to the adoption of the Convention ........................... 3 II.2. Related developments after the adoption of the Convention ........................... 5 III. Supervision of obligations arising under or relating to Conventions ........................
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review: Trade Unions in Western Europe: Hard Times, Hard Choices
    Book Review: Trade Unions in Western Europe: Hard Times, Hard Choices blogs.lse.ac.uk /lsereviewof books/2013/12/05/book-review-trade-unions-in-western-europe-hard- times-hard-choices/ Blog Admin In this book the authors attempt to provide an account of how trade unionism has evolved in ten west European countries, the main recent challenges that unions have faced, and their responses. This work will certainly make a fundamental contribution to the debate about the future role and functions of unions as the authors provide key insights in their attempt to identify how unions can learn to attract new members and enhance their strategic capacities, writes Pietro Manzella. Trade Unions in West ern Europe: Hard Times, Hard Choices. Rebecca Gumbrell- McCormick and Richard Hyman. Oxf ord Universit y Press. Oct ober 2013. Find t his book: Are unions still relevant actors in the twenty- first century? Can they still give ‘voice’ to employees? If so, to what extent can they do this? What is the trade union response to globalization? The answer to these and other questions concerning trade unions is to be found in the latest work by Rebecca Gumbrell- McCormick and Richard Hyman. Trade Unions in Western Europe: Hard Times, Hard Choices sets its sights on the changing functions of unions in western countries in the twenty- first century. In tackling this contentious issue, these two influential scholars supply convincing arguments to explain why the role of unions is still decisive in today’s industrial relations arena. The study is the result of a research project funded by the Danish Social Research Council, which enabled the authors to carry out fieldwork on union responses to globalization.
    [Show full text]
  • National Policy Guide 2019
    National Policy Guide 2019 Incorporating the decisions of Congress 2018 KEY symbol signifies where a CEC Statement or CEC Special Report has been agreed by Congress. Please refer to those documents for more detail. (2016: C1) where references are given, the first part represents the Congress year and the latter the motion or composite (so this refers to Composite 1 from GMB Congress 2016) All Congress documents from 2005 onwards can be found on the GMB website at www.gmb.org.uk/congress Background GMB Annual Congress is the supreme policy making authority of GMB. It deals with motions and rule amendments from GMB Branches, Regional Committees and the Central Executive Council (CEC). In addition, other issues such as CEC special reports, CEC Statements and Financial Reports are debated and voted on. Once these have been endorsed, they become GMB Policy for the union as a whole. Following the endorsement of the CEC Special Report ‘Framework for the Future of the GMB: Moving Forward’ at Congress 2007, it was agreed that Congress will not debate motions which are determined to be existing union policy. At its meetings prior to Congress, the CEC identifies those Congress motions which are in line with existing GMB policy. These recommendations are reported to Congress in SOC Report No 1 at the start of Congress. Delegates will be asked to endorse these motions and if agreed, the motions will not be debated. However following Congress progress on these motions will continue to be reported. The following guide is an indication of GMB policy but is not a definitive list.
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Bargaining and Gender Equality Jane Pillinger and Nora Wintour
    The Gendered Economy Series Editors: Sara Cantillon and Diane Elson This path-breaking new series critically examines the economy and the theory and methodology of economics through the lens of gender. It will publish original and incisive research that explores the role of gender in the contemporary global economy. The series showcases how economic relationships, actions and institutions are directly affected by gender norms, how a gendered perspective illuminates aspects of the economy that would otherwise be ignored, and challenges many of the tenets that underpin both the mainstream and heterodox interpretation of how economies function. Published Collective Bargaining and Gender Equality Jane Pillinger and Nora Wintour The Economy’s Other Half James Heintz The Sex Economy Monica O’Connor COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AND GENDER EQUALITY Jane Pillinger and Nora Wintour We dedicate this book to our sisters © Jane Pillinger and Nora Wintour 2019 This book is copyright under the Berne Convention. No reproduction without permission. All rights reserved. First published in 2019 by Agenda Publishing Agenda Publishing Limited The Core Bath Lane Newcastle Helix Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5TF www.agendapub.com ISBN 978-1-78821-076-8 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Typeset by JS Typesetting Ltd, Porthcawl, Mid Glamorgan Printed and bound in the UK by Short Run Press Ltd, Exeter, Devon Contents Acknowledgements vii Acronyms ix Foreword by Series Editors xv 1. Introduction 1 2. The gender dimensions of collective bargaining 9 3. Collective bargaining as a tool for gender equality: evidence from across the world 35 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Form AR21 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 Annual Return for a Trade Union
    Form AR21 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 Annual Return for a Trade Union Name of Trade Union: GMB Year ended: 31st December 2020 List no: 707T Head or Main Office address: Mary Turner House 22 Stephenson Way London Postcode NW1 2HD Website address (if available) www.gmb.org.uk Has the address changed during the Yes No ('X' in appropriate box) year to which the return relates? x General Secretary: Warren Kenny (Acting General Secretary) Telephone Number: 020 7391 6700 Contact name for queries regarding Allan Wylie the completion of this return Telephone Number: 020 7391 6700 E-mail: [email protected] Please follow the guidance notes in the completion of this return Any difficulties or problems in the completion of this return should be directed to the Certification Officer as below or by telephone to: 0330 109 3602 You should send the annual return to the following email address stating the name of the union in subject: For Unions based in England and Wales: [email protected] For Unions based in Scotland: [email protected] P1 Contents Trade Union's details…………………………………..………………………..……………………………….…….……..………………………………………………..1 Return of members…………………………………………..……………………………………………………...….…........…….….…………………..…….…………2 Change of officers…………………………………………………..……………………………………………….…………..………………..………….....………………2 Officers in post…………………………………………………..…………………………………………………………………....…..………………………………………2a General fund………………………………………………..……………………………………………...…..……….…..………..….....…………………….……..….…….3 Analysis of income from
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Firms Is Linked to Both Family Labour and Outside Piece Workers, No Such Relationship Is Found for Foreign Firms
    Access to Electronic Thesis Author: Damien Cassells Thesis title: The Roles of Foreign Labour and Foreign Firms in the Irish Economy: An Empirical Analysis Qualification: PhD This electronic thesis is protected by the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. No reproduction is permitted without consent of the author. It is also protected by the Creative Commons Licence allowing Attributions-Non-commercial-No derivatives. If this electronic thesis has been edited by the author it will be indicated as such on the title page and in the text. The Roles of Foreign Labour and Foreign Firms in the Irish Economy: An Empirical Analysis Damien Cassells A Dissertation Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Economics Thesis supervisors: Professor Sarah Brown Professor Karl Taylor Department of Economics University of Sheffield July 2010 Declaration I hereby certify that this material is entirely my own work and has not been taken from the work of others save to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. It has not been submitted as an exercise for a degree at this or any other University. I agree that the library may lend or copy the thesis upon request. Signed: _______________________ ID Number: ___________________ Date: _________________________ 2 Abstract The focus of this thesis is upon the role of foreign labour and foreign firms in the Irish economy. Chapter 1 presents an introduction to the overall thesis, while the historical context for the Irish economy is presented in Chapter 2. The empirical analysis presented in Chapter 3 explains occupational attainment in Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • 64Th ANNUAL REPORT
    64th (2013-14) Annual Report UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Dholpur House, Shahjahan Road New Delhi – 110069 http: //www.upsc.gov.in The Union Public Service Commission have the privilege to present before the President their Sixty Fourth Report as required under Article 323(1) of the Constitution. This Report covers the period from April 1, 2013 (Chaitra 11, 1935 Saka) to March 31, 2014 (Chaitra 10, 1936 Saka). Annual Report 2013-14 Contents List of abbreviations ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- (ix) Composition of the Commission during the year 2013-14 ----------------------------- (xi) List of Chapters Chapter Heading Page No. 1 Highlights 1-3 2 Brief History and Workload over the years 5-10 3 Recruitment by Examinations 11-19 4 Direct Recruitment by Selection 21-27 5 Recruitment Rules, Service Rules and Mode of Recruitment 29-31 6 Promotions and Deputations 33-40 7 Representation of candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes, Scheduled 41-44 Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Persons with Disabilities 8 Disciplinary Cases 45-46 9 Delays in implementing advice of the Commission 47-48 10 Non-acceptance of the Advice of the Commission by the Government 49-70 11 Administration and Finance 71-72 12 Miscellaneous 73-77 Acknowledgement 79 List of Appendices Appendix Subject Page No. 1 Profiles of Hon’ble Chairman and Hon’ble Members of the Commission. 81-88 2 Recommendations made by the Commission – Relating to suitability of 89 candidates/officials. 3 Recommendations made by the Commission – Relating to Exemption 89 cases, Service matters, Seniority etc. 4 Recruitment by Examinations – Details of recommendations made during 90 the year 2013-14 for Civil Services/Posts.
    [Show full text]
  • Genre and Identity in British and Irish National Histories, 1541-1691
    “NO ROOM IN HISTORY”: GENRE AND IDENTIY IN BRITISH AND IRISH NATIONAL HISTORIES, 1541-1691 A dissertation presented by Sarah Elizabeth Connell to The Department of English In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the field of English Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts April 2014 1 “NO ROOM IN HISTORY”: GENRE AND IDENTIY IN BRITISH AND IRISH NATIONAL HISTORIES, 1541-1691 by Sarah Elizabeth Connell ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English in the College of Social Sciences and Humanities of Northeastern University April 2014 2 ABSTRACT In this project, I build on the scholarship that has challenged the historiographic revolution model to question the valorization of the early modern humanist narrative history’s sophistication and historiographic advancement in direct relation to its concerted efforts to shed the purportedly pious, credulous, and naïve materials and methods of medieval history. As I demonstrate, the methodologies available to early modern historians, many of which were developed by medieval chroniclers, were extraordinary flexible, able to meet a large number of scholarly and political needs. I argue that many early modern historians worked with medieval texts and genres not because they had yet to learn more sophisticated models for representing the past, but rather because one of the most effective ways that these writers dealt with the political and religious exigencies of their times was by adapting the practices, genres, and materials of medieval history. I demonstrate that the early modern national history was capable of supporting multiple genres and reading modes; in fact, many of these histories reflect their authors’ conviction that authentic past narratives required genres with varying levels of facticity.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberty Template
    Vol. 16 No 5 December 2017 ISSN 0791-458X Brexit Protecting 2017 the year of breakthrough Whistleblowers women’s football Page 10 Page 13 Page 30 More action needed to curb precarious work by Scott Millar Long awaited government proposals to change em- ployment law in order to provide greater security for workers, have been described by trade unions as a step in the right direction but in need of amendment if they are to provide adequate protections against precarious work practices. The Employment (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2017 was published on 7th December. The Bill proposes to make it mandatory that workers are provided with their core terms of employment within five days of beginning a job. The legislation will also ban zero hours contracts “in most circumstances”, with exceptions including to allow employers to provide cover in emergency situations or to cover short-term absences. SIPTU Services Division Organiser, Ethel Buckley, said: “While there are positive aspects to these proposals more must be done to protect SIPTU members Liz Cloherty, Maria Power and Stephanie Lee calling on the Government to give Section 39 workers’ pay workers against the rapid expansion in precarious work practices. justice outside Leinster House on Wednesday, 8th November 2017. See page 15. Photo: Rolling News SIPTU is focused on this issue because it affects a growing number of workers. “As part of our Fighting for the Future of Work campaign our mem- bers are calling for a remedial social statute which will put right the social wrong of precarious work and provide workers with an entitle- 2017 Highlights Crossword ment to security of hours.” Page 16-17 Page 31 She added: “Together with ICTU, we are campaigning for amend- ments to this Bill so that the scope of its ban on zero hours contracts Continued on page 2 WORKERS RIGHTS CENTRE 8.30 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Hertfordshire Business
    THE UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE BUSINESS SCHOOL WORKING PAPER SERIES The Working Paper series is intended for rapid dissemination of research results, work-in-progress, innovative teaching methods, etc., at the pre-publication stage. Comments are welcomed and should be addressed to the individual author(s). It should be remembered that papers in this series are often provisional and comments and/or citation should take account of this. For further information about this, and other papers in the series, please contact: University of Hertfordshire Business School College Lane Hatfield Hertfordshire AL10 9AB United Kingdom 1 ‘Useful’ outcomes for workers in trade union learning initiatives. The significance of attitude and ownership. Steve Shelley Centre for Research in Employment Studies University of Hertfordshire Business School Abstract The paper draws upon evidence from trade union learning initiatives that are funded by the Union Learning Fund or involve Union Learning Representatives in the UK. With reference to Chartist, radical and more broadly societal views of learning, analysis of learning topics, contexts and uses provides the basis for an understanding of ‘useful’ learning, around the themes of attitude and ownership. Whilst recognising limitations of trade union learning, it is suggested that these initiatives contribute to radical outcomes individually and collectively, arising directly and indirectly from the learning activities. This suggests the potential for outcomes which hark back to earlier understandings of the purpose of trade union education and worker emancipation. The part this may play in the readjustment of the balance of power between labour and capital and in enabling the development of a more inclusive and high skill society, is considered.
    [Show full text]