DOCSLIB.ORG

Seeing Through Moving Eyes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Seeing Through Moving Eyes bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/083691; this version posted June 1, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Seeing through moving eyes - microsaccadic information sampling provides 2 Drosophila hyperacute vision 3 4 Mikko Juusola1,2*‡, An Dau2‡, Zhuoyi Song2‡, Narendra Solanki2, Diana Rien1,2, David Jaciuch2, 5 Sidhartha Dongre2, Florence Blanchard2, Gonzalo G. de Polavieja3, Roger C. Hardie4 and Jouni 6 Takalo2 7 8 1National Key laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing, Beijing Normal 9 University, Beijing 100875, China 10 2Department of Biomedical Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 T2N, UK 11 3Champalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Center for the Unknown, Lisbon, 12 Portugal 13 4Department of Physiology Development and Neuroscience, Cambridge University, Cambridge CB2 14 3EG, UK 15 16 *Correspondence to: m.juusola@sheffield.ac.uk 17 ‡ Equal contribution 18 19 Small fly eyes should not see fine image details. Because flies exhibit saccadic visual behaviors 20 and their compound eyes have relatively few ommatidia (sampling points), their photoreceptors 21 would be expected to generate blurry and coarse retinal images of the world. Here we 22 demonstrate that Drosophila see the world far better than predicted from the classic theories. 23 By using electrophysiological, optical and behavioral assays, we found that R1-R6 24 photoreceptors’ encoding capacity in time is maximized to fast high-contrast bursts, which 25 resemble their light input during saccadic behaviors. Whilst over space, R1-R6s resolve moving 26 objects at saccadic speeds beyond the predicted motion-blur-limit. Our results show how 27 refractory phototransduction and rapid photomechanical photoreceptor contractions jointly 28 sharpen retinal images of moving objects in space-time, enabling hyperacute vision, and explain 29 how such microsaccadic information sampling exceeds the compound eyes’ optical limits. These 30 discoveries elucidate how acuity depends upon photoreceptor function and eye movements. 31 32 INTRODUCTION 33 The acuity of an eye is limited by its photoreceptor spacing, which provides the grain of the retinal 34 image. To resolve two stationary objects, at least three photoreceptors are needed for detecting the 35 intensity difference in between. To resolve two moving objects is harder, as vision becomes further 36 limited by each photoreceptor’s finite integration time and receptive field size (Srinivasan & Bernard, 37 1975; Juusola & French, 1997; Land, 1997). 38 Nevertheless, animals - from insects to man - view the world by using saccades, fast 39 movements, which direct their eyes to the surroundings, and fixation intervals between the saccades, 40 during which gaze is held near stationary (Land, 1999). Because of photoreceptors’ slow integration- 41 time, saccades should blur image details and these are thought to be sampled when gaze is stabilized. 42 Thus, information would be captured during fixations whilst during saccades animals would be 43 effectively blind. This viewpoint, however, ignores fast photoreceptor adaptation, which causes 44 perceptual fading during fixation (Ditchburn & Ginsborg, 1952; Riggs & Ratliff, 1952), reducing 45 visual information. Therefore, to maximize information and acuity, it is plausible that evolution has 46 optimized photoreceptor function in respect to visual behaviors and needs. 47 We have now devised a suite of new experimental and theoretical methods to study this 48 question both in time and over space in Drosophila R1-R6 photoreceptors. The Drosophila compound 49 eyes are composed of ~750 seemingly regular lens-capped modules called the ommatidia, which 50 should provide the fly a panoramic visual field of low optical resolution (Barlow, 1952; Land, 1997). 51 Each ommatidium contains eight photoreceptor cells (R1-R8), pointing to seven different directions. 52 The ultraviolet and blue-green-sensitive outer photoreceptors, R1-R6, initiate the motion vision 53 pathway, whilst the central R7 and R8, which lie on top of each other, detect different colors from one 54 direction (Wardill et al., 2012). Owing to the eye’s neural superposition principle, R1, R2, R3, R4, R5 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/083691; this version posted June 1, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 and R6, each from a separate neighboring ommatidium, also point to the same direction. By pooling 2 their output for synaptic transmission, the photoreceptor spacing (spatial resolution) effectively 3 matches the ommatidium spacing (average interommatidial angle, Δφ = 4.5o (Götz, 1964; Land, 1997; 4 Gonzalez-Bellido et al., 2011) but the signal-to-noise ratio of the transmitted image could improve by 5 √6 (van Steveninck & Laughlin, 1996; Zheng et al., 2006). 6 Here we show how evolution has improved Drosophila vision beyond these classic ideas, 7 suggesting that light information sampling in R1-R6 photoreceptors is tuned to saccadic behavior. 8 Our intracellular recordings reveal that R1-R6s capture 2-to-4-times more information in time 9 than previous maximum estimates (Juusola & Hardie, 2001a; Song et al., 2012; Song & Juusola, 10 2014) when responding to high-contrast bursts (periods of rapid light changes followed by quiescent 11 periods) that resemble light input from natural scenes generated by saccadic viewing. Biophysically- 12 realistic model simulations suggest that this improvement largely results from interspersed “fixation” 13 intervals, which sensitize photoreceptors - by relieving their refractory microvilli (Song et al., 2012; 14 Song & Juusola, 2014; Juusola et al., 2015) - to sample more information from phasic light changes. 15 Remarkably, over space, our intracellular recordings, high-speed microscopy and modeling 16 further reveal how photomechanical photoreceptor contractions (Hardie & Franze, 2012) work 17 together with refractory sampling to improve spatial acuity. We discover that by actively modulating 18 light input and photoreceptor output, these processes reduce motion blur during saccades and 19 adaptation during gaze fixation, which otherwise could fade vision (Ditchburn & Ginsborg, 1952; 20 Riggs & Ratliff, 1952; Land, 1997). The resulting phasic responses sharpen retinal images by 21 highlighting the times when visual objects cross a photoreceptor’s receptive field, thereby encoding 22 space in time (see also: Ahissar & Arieli, 2001; Donner & Hemilä, 2007; Rucci et al., 2007; Kuang et 23 al., 2012a; Kuang et al., 2012b; Franceschini et al., 2014; Viollet, 2014). Thus, neither saccades nor 24 fixations blind the flies, but together improve vision. 25 Incorporation of this novel opto-mechano-electric mechanism into our ‘microsaccadic 26 sampling’-model predicts that Drosophila can see >4-fold finer details than their eyes’ spatial 27 sampling limit – a prediction directly confirmed by optomotor behavior experiments. By 28 demonstrating how fly photoreceptors’ fast microsaccadic information sampling provides hyperacute 29 vision of moving images, these results change our understanding of insect vision, whilst showing an 30 important relationship between eye movements and visual acuity. 31 32 RESULTS 33 These results establish that Drosophila exploit image motion (through eye movements) to see spatial 34 details, down to hyperacute resolution. A fly’s visual acuity is limited by how well its photoreceptors 35 resolve different photon rate changes, and their receptive field sizes. However, because each 36 photoreceptor’s signal-to-noise ratio and receptive field size adapt dynamically to light changes, 37 acuity also depends upon the eye movements that cause them. To make these relationships clear, the 38 results are presented in the following order: 39 1st We show that photoreceptors capture most visual information from high-contrast bursts, and 40 reveal how this is achieved by refractory photon sampling and connectivity (Figures 1-5). 41 2nd We show that saccades and gaze fixations in natural environment results in such high-contrast 42 bursts, implying that eye movements work with refractory sampling to improve vision 43 (Figure 6). 44 3rd We demonstrate that photoreceptors contract to light in vivo and explain how these 45 microsaccades move and narrow their receptive fields (Figures 7-8) to sharpen light input and 46 photoreceptor output in time. 47 4th Collectively, these dynamics predict that Drosophila see finer spatial details than their 48 compound eyes’ optical resolution over a broad range of image velocities (Figure 9), and we 49 verify this by optomotor behavior (Figure 10). 50 Videos 1-4 and Appendixes 1-10 explain in detail the new ideas, methods, experiments and theory 51 behind these results. 52 53 Breaking the code by coupling experiments with theory 54 To work out how well a Drosophila R1-R6 photoreceptor can see the world, we compared 55 intracellular recordings with realistic theoretical predictions from extensive quantal light information 2 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/083691; this version posted June 1, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 sampling simulations (Appendixes 1-3), having the following physical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spatial Restriction of Light Adaptation Inactivation in Fly Photoreceptors and Mutation-Induced
    The Journal of Neuroscience, April 1991, 7 f(4): 900-909 Spatial Restriction of Light Adaptation and Mutation-Induced Inactivation in Fly Photoreceptors Baruch Minke and Richard Payne” Department of Neuroscience, The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205 The spatial spread within fly photoreceptors of 2 forms of We describe simple preparations of the retinas of the housefly, desensitization by bright light have been investigated: the Musca domestica, and the sheepblowfly, Lucilia cuprina, that natural process of light adaptation in normal Musca photo- allow recording from individual ommatidia in vitro, using a receptors and a receptor-potential inactivation in the no- suction pipette similar to that used to record from rod photo- steady-state (nss) mutant of the sheep blowfly Lucilia. The receptors of the vertebrate retina (Baylor et al., 1979; for a suction-electrode method used for recording from verte- preliminary use of this method, see also Becker et al., 1987). brate rods was applied to fly ommatidia. A single ommatid- The suction-electrode method has 2 advantages when applied ium in vitro was partially sucked into a recording pipette. to fly photoreceptors. First, the method might prove to be more Illumination of the portion of the ommatidium within the pi- convenient than the use of intracellular microelectrodes when pette resulted in a flow of current having a wave form similar recording from small photoreceptors, such as those of Drosoph- to that of the receptor potential and polarity consistent with ila. Recordings from Drosophila are needed to perform func- current flow into the illuminated region of the photorecep- tional tests on mutant flies.
    [Show full text]
  • Spectral Sensitivities of Wolf Spider Eyes
    =ORNELL UNIVERSITY ~',lC.V~;AL ~ULLE(.~E DEF'ARY~,:ENT OF P~-I:~IOLOGY 1300 YORK AVE.~UE NEW YORK, N.Y. Spectral Sensitivities of Wolf Spider Eyes ROBERT D. DBVOE, RALPH J. W. SMALL, and JANIS E. ZVARGULIS From the Department of Physiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205 ABSTRACT ERG's to spectral lights were recorded from all eyes of intact wolf spiders. Secondary eyes have maximum relative sensitivities at 505-510 nm which are unchanged by chromatic adaptations. Principal eyes have ultraviolet sensitivities which are 10 to 100 times greater at 380 nm than at 505 nm. How- ever, two animals' eyes initially had greater blue-green sensitivities, then in 7 to 10 wk dropped 4 to 6 log units in absolute sensitivity in the visible, less in the ultraviolet. Chromatic adaptations of both types of principal eyes hardly changed relative spectral sensitivities. Small decreases in relative sensitivity in the visible with orange adaptations were possibly retinomotor in origin. Second peaks in ERG waveforms were elicited from ultraviolet-adapted principal eyes by wavelengths 400 nm and longer, and from blue-, yellow-, and orange- adapted secondary eyes by wavelengths 580 nm and longer. The second peaks in waveforms were most likely responses of unilluminated eyes to scattered light. It is concluded that both principal and secondary eyes contain cells with a visual pigment absorbing maximally at 505-510 nm. The variable absolute and ultraviolet sensitivities of principal eyes may be due to a second pigment in the same cells or to an ultraviolet-absorbing accessory pigment which excites the 505 nm absorbing visual pigment by radiationless energy transfer.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction; Environment & Review of Eyes in Different Species
    The Biological Vision System: Introduction; Environment & Review of Eyes in Different Species James T. Fulton https://neuronresearch.net/vision/ Abstract: Keywords: Biological, Human, Vision, phylogeny, vitamin A, Electrolytic Theory of the Neuron, liquid crystal, Activa, anatomy, histology, cytology PROCESSES IN BIOLOGICAL VISION: including, ELECTROCHEMISTRY OF THE NEURON Introduction 1- 1 1 Introduction, Phylogeny & Generic Forms 1 “Vision is the process of discovering from images what is present in the world, and where it is” (Marr, 1985) ***When encountering a citation to a Section number in the following material, the first numeric is a chapter number. All cited chapters can be found at https://neuronresearch.net/vision/document.htm *** 1.1 Introduction While the material in this work is designed for the graduate student undertaking independent study of the vision sensory modality of the biological system, with a certain amount of mathematical sophistication on the part of the reader, the major emphasis is on specific models down to specific circuits used within the neuron. The Chapters are written to stand-alone as much as possible following the block diagram in Section 1.5. However, this requires frequent cross-references to other Chapters as the analyses proceed. The results can be followed by anyone with a college degree in Science. However, to replicate the (photon) Excitation/De-excitation Equation, a background in differential equations and integration-by-parts is required. Some background in semiconductor physics is necessary to understand how the active element within a neuron operates and the unique character of liquid-crystalline water (the backbone of the neural system). The level of sophistication in the animal vision system is quite remarkable.
    [Show full text]
  • Circadian Clocks in Crustaceans: Identified Neuronal and Cellular Systems
    Circadian clocks in crustaceans: identified neuronal and cellular systems Johannes Strauss, Heinrich Dircksen Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius vag 18A, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Abstract 2. Introduction: crustacean circadian biology 2.1. Rhythms and circadian phenomena 2.2. Chronobiological systems in Crustacea 2.3. Pacemakers in crustacean circadian systems 3. The cellular basis of crustacean circadian rhythms 3.1. The retina of the eye 3.1.1. Eye pigment migration and its adaptive role 3.1.2. Receptor potential changes of retinular cells in the electroretinogram (ERG) 3.2. Eyestalk systems and mediators of circadian rhythmicity 3.2.1. Red pigment concentrating hormone (RPCH) 3.2.2. Crustacean hyperglycaemic hormone (CHH) 3.2.3. Pigment-dispersing hormone (PDH) 3.2.4. Serotonin 3.2.5. Melatonin 3.2.6. Further factors with possible effects on circadian rhythmicity 3.3. The caudal photoreceptor of the crayfish terminal abdominal ganglion (CPR) 3.4. Extraretinal brain photoreceptors 3.5. Integration of distributed circadian clock systems and rhythms 4. Comparative aspects of crustacean clocks 4.1. Evolution of circadian pacemakers in arthropods 4.2. Putative clock neurons conserved in crustaceans and insects 4.3. Clock genes in crustaceans 4.3.1. Current knowledge about insect clock genes 4.3.2. Crustacean clock-gene 4.3.3. Crustacean period-gene 4.3.4. Crustacean cryptochrome-gene 5. Perspective 6. Acknowledgements 7. References 1. ABSTRACT Circadian rhythms are known for locomotory and reproductive behaviours, and the functioning of sensory organs, nervous structures, metabolism and developmental processes. The mechanisms and cellular bases of control are mainly inferred from circadian phenomenologies, ablation experiments and pharmacological approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biochromes ) 1.2
    FORSCHUNG 45 CHIMIA 49 (1995) Nr. 3 (Miirz) Chim;a 49 (1995) 45-68 quire specific molecules, pigments or dyes © Neue Schweizerische Chemische Gesellschaft (biochromes) or systems containing them, /SSN 0009-4293 to absorb the light energy. Photoprocesses and colors are essential for life on earth, and without these biochromes and the photophysical and photochemical interac- tions, life as we know it would not have The Function of Natural been possible [1][2]. a Colorants: The Biochromes ) 1.2. Notation The terms colorants, dyes, and pig- ments ought to be used in the following way [3]: Colorants are either dyes or pig- Hans-Dieter Martin* ments, the latter being practically insolu- ble in the media in which they are applied. Indiscriminate use of these terms is fre- Abstract. The colors of nature belong undoubtedly to the beautiful part of our quently to be found in literature, but in environment. Colors always fascinated humans and left them wonderstruck. But the many biological systems it is not possible trivial question as to the practical application of natural colorants led soon and at all to make this differentiation. The consequently to coloring and dyeing of objects and humans. Aesthetical, ritual and coloring compounds of organisms have similar aspects prevailed. This function of dyes and pigments is widespread in natl)re. been referred to as biochromes, and this The importance of such visual-effective dyes is obvious: they support communication seems to be a suitable expression for a between organisms with the aid of conspicuous optical signals and they conceal biological colorant, since it circumvents revealing ones, wl,1eninconspicuosness can mean survival.
    [Show full text]
  • Portia Perceptions: the Umwelt of an Araneophagic Jumping Spider
    Portia Perceptions: The Umwelt of an Araneophagic Jumping 1 Spider Duane P. Harland and Robert R. Jackson The Personality of Portia Spiders are traditionally portrayed as simple, instinct-driven animals (Savory, 1928; Drees, 1952; Bristowe, 1958). Small brain size is perhaps the most compelling reason for expecting so little flexibility from our eight-legged neighbors. Fitting comfortably on the head of a pin, a spider brain seems to vanish into insignificance. Common sense tells us that compared with large-brained mammals, spiders have so little to work with that they must be restricted to a circumscribed set of rigid behaviors, flexibility being a luxury afforded only to those with much larger central nervous systems. In this chapter we review recent findings on an unusual group of spiders that seem to be arachnid enigmas. In a number of ways the behavior of the araneophagic jumping spiders is more comparable to that of birds and mammals than conventional wisdom would lead us to expect of an arthropod. The term araneophagic refers to these spiders’ preference for other spiders as prey, and jumping spider is the common English name for members of the family Saltici- dae. Although both their common and the scientific Latin names acknowledge their jumping behavior, it is really their unique, complex eyes that set this family of spiders apart from all others. Among spiders (many of which have very poor vision), salticids have eyes that are by far the most specialized for resolving fine spatial detail. We focus here on the most extensively studied genus, Portia. Before we discuss the interrelationship between the salticids’ uniquely acute vision, their predatory strategies, and their apparent cognitive abilities, we need to offer some sense of what kind of animal a jumping spider is; to do this, we attempt to offer some insight into what we might call Portia’s personality.
    [Show full text]
  • Vision-In-Arthropoda.Pdf
    Introduction Arthropods possess various kinds of sensory structures which are sensitive to different kinds of stimuli. Arthropods possess simple as well as compound eyes; the latter evolved in Arthropods and are found in no other group of animals. Insects that possess both types of eyes: simple and compound. Photoreceptors: sensitive to light Photoreceptor in Arthropoda 1. Simple Eyes 2. Compound Eyes 1. Simple Eyes in Arthropods - Ocelli The word ocelli are derived from the Latin word ocellus which means little eye. Ocelli are simple eyes which comprise of single lens for collecting and focusing light. Arthropods possess two kinds of ocelli a) Dorsal Ocelli b) Lateral Ocelli (Stemmata) Dorsal Ocellus - Dorsal ocelli are found on the dorsal or front surface of the head of nymphs and adults of several hemimetabolous insects. These are bounded by compound eyes on lateral sides. Dorsal ocelli are not present in those arthropods which lack compound eyes. • Dorsal ocellus has single corneal lens which covers a number of sensory rod- like structures, rhabdome. • The ocellar lens may be curved, for example in bees, locusts and dragonflies; or flat as in cockroaches. • It is sensitive to a wide range of wavelengths and shows quick response to changes in light intensity. • It cannot form an image and is unable to recognize the object. Lateral Ocellus - Stemmata Lateral ocelli, It is also known as stemmata. They are the only eyes in the larvae of holometabolous and certain adult insects such as spring tails, silver fish, fleas and stylops. These are called lateral eyes because they are always present in the lateral region of the head.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen Colour in the Eyes of Insects Stavenga, D.G
    University of Groningen Colour in the eyes of insects Stavenga, D.G. Published in: Journal of Comparative Physiology A; Sensory Neural, and Behavioral Physiology DOI: 10.1007/s00359-002-0307-9 IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2002 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Stavenga, D. G. (2002). Colour in the eyes of insects. Journal of Comparative Physiology A; Sensory Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 188(5), 337-348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-002-0307-9 Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 26-09-2021 J Comp Physiol A (2002) 188: 337–348 DOI 10.1007/s00359-002-0307-9 REVIEW D.G. Stavenga Colour in the eyes of insects Accepted: 15 March 2002 / Published online: 13 April 2002 Ó Springer-Verlag 2002 Abstract Many insect species have darkly coloured provide the input for the visual neuropiles, which eyes, but distinct colours or patterns are frequently process the light signals to detect motion, colours, or featured.
    [Show full text]
  • Attention and Individual Behavioural Variation in Small-Brained Animals – Using Bumblebees and Zebrafish As Model Systems
    Attention and individual behavioural variation in small-brained animals – using bumblebees and zebrafish as model systems Mu-Yun Wang Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen Mary, University of London 2013 1 Abstract A vital ability for an animal is to filter the constant flow of sensory input from the environment to focus on the most important information. Attention is used to prioritize sensory input for adaptive responses. The role of attention in visual search has been studied extensively in human and non-human primates, but is much less studied in other animals. We looked at attentional mechanisms, especially selective and divided attention where animals focus on multiple cues at the same time, using a visual search paradigm. We targeted bumblebee and zebrafish as model species because they are widely used as tractable models of information processing in comparatively small brains. Bees were required to forage from target and distractor flowers in the presence of predators. We found that bees could selectively attend to certain dimension of the stimuli, and divide their attention to both visual foraging search and predator avoidance tasks simultaneously. Furthermore, bees showed consistent individual differences in foraging strategy; ‘careful’ and ‘impulsive’ strategies exist in individuals of the same colony. From the calculation of foraging rate, it is shown that the best strategy may depend on environmental conditions. We applied a similar behavioural paradigm to zebrafish and found speed-accuracy tradeoffs and consistent individual behavioural differences. We therefore continued to test how individuality influences group choices. In pairs of careful and impulsive fish, the consensus decision is close to the strategy of the careful individual.
    [Show full text]
  • Isoxanthopterin: an Optically Functional Biogenic Crystal in the Eyes of Decapod Crustaceans Authors: Benjamin A
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/240366; this version posted December 28, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Isoxanthopterin: An Optically Functional Biogenic Crystal in the Eyes of Decapod Crustaceans Authors: Benjamin A. Palmer,a,1,2 Anna Hirsch,b,1 Vlad Brumfeld,c Eliahu D. Aflalo,d Iddo Pinkas,c Amir Sagi,d,e S. Rozenne,f Dan Oron,g Leslie Leiserowitz,b Leeor Kronik,b Steve Weinera and Lia Addadi,a,2 Affiliations: aDepartment of Structural Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 7610001, Israel. bDepartment of Materials and Interfaces, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 7610001, Israel. cDepartment of Chemical Research Support, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 7610001, Israel. dDepartment of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, 8410501, Israel. eThe National Institute for Biotechnology in the Negev, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer- Sheva, 8410501, Israel. fDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 7610001, Israel. gDepartment of Physics of Complex Systems, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 7610001, Israel. 1B.A.P. and A.H. contributed equally to this work. 2To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: Benjamin.Palmer@weizmann.ac.il and Lia.Addadi@weizmann.ac.il Abstract The eyes of some aquatic animals form images through reflective optics. Shrimp, lobsters, crayfish and prawns possess reflecting superposition compound eyes, composed of thousands of square-faceted eye- units (ommatidia). Mirrors in the upper part of the eye (the distal mirror) reflect light collected from many ommatidia onto the underlying photosensitive elements of the retina, the rhabdoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary Animal Physiology Circulatory System (See Also Human Biology 1)
    1 Glossary Animal Physiology Circulatory System (see also Human Biology 1) Aneurism: Localized dilatation of the artery wall due to the rupture of collagen sheaths. Arteriosclerosis: A disease marked by an increase in thickness and a reduction in elasticity of the arterial wall; SMC, smooth muscle cells can (due to an increase in Na-intake or permanent stress related factors) be stimulated to increase deposition of SMC in the media surrounding the artery resulting in a decreased lumen available for the blood to be transported, hence rising the blood pressure, which itself signalizes to the SMC that more cells to be deposited to resist the increase pressure until little lumen is left over, leading for example to heart attack. Arterial System: The branching vessels that are thick, elastic, and muscular, with the following functions: • act as a conduit for blood between the heart and capillaries • act as pressure reservoir for forcing blood into small-diameter arterioles • dampen heart -related oscillations of pressure and flow, results in an even flow of blood into capillaries • control distribution of blood to different capillary networks via selective constriction of the terminal branches of the arterial tree. Atria: A chamber that gives entrance to another structure or organ; usually used to refer to the atrium of the heart. Baroreceptor: Sensory nerve ending, stimulated by changes in pressure, as those in the walls of blood vessels. Blood: The fluid (composed of 45% solid compounds and 55% liquid) circulated by the heart in a vertebrate, carrying oxygen, nutrients, hormones, defensive proteins (albumins and globulins, fibronigen etc.), throughout the body and waste materials to excretory organs; it is functionally similar in invertebrates.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of the Regional Differences in the Eye of the Mantis Ciulfina
    J. exp. Biol. (i979). 80, 165-190 165 With 17 figures Printed in Great Britain ANATOMY OF THE REGIONAL DIFFERENCES IN THE EYE OF THE MANTIS CIULFINA BY G. A. HORRIDGE AND PETER DUELLI Department of Neurobiology, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, A.C.T. 2601, Australia (Received 8 August 1978) SUMMARY 1. In the compound eye of Ciulfina (Mantidae) there are large regional differences in interommatidial angle as measured optically from the pseudo- pupil. Notably there is an acute zone which looks backwards as well as one looking forwards. There are correlated regional differences in the dimensions of the ommatidia. 2. The following anatomical features which influence the optical perform- ance have been measured in different parts of the eye: (a) The facet diameter is greater where the interommatidial angle is smaller. This could influence resolving power, but calculation shows that facet size does not exert a dominant effect on the visual fields of the receptors. (b) The rhabdom tip diameter, which theoretically has a strong influence on the size of visual fields, is narrower in eye regions where the inter- ommatidial angle is smaller. (c) The cone length, from which the focal length can be estimated, is greater where the interommatidial angle is smaller. 3. Estimation of the amount of light reaching the rhabdom suggests that different parts of the eye have similar sensitivity to a point source of light, but differ by a factor of at least 10 in sensitivity to an extended source. 4. There is anatomical evidence that in the acute zone the sensitivity has been sacrificed for the sake of resolution.
    [Show full text]