City-Hub" Project Acronym: City-HUB
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
EUROPEAN COMMISSION SEVENTH FRAMEWORK COOPERATION WORK PROGRAMME Innovative design and operation of new or upgraded efficient urban transport interchanges THEME [SST.2012.3.1-2.] Collaborative project Grant agreement no: 314262 Project full title: "City-Hub" Project acronym: City-HUB City-HUB Project FINAL REPORT ATTACHED DOCUMENTS TO THE FINAL PUBLISHABLE SUMMARY REPORT Figure 1 City-HUB vision of interchanges. Figure 2 City-HUB surveyed Interchanges Table 1 Terminal related barriers and remedial measures. Barriers Recommendations Involvement of several authorities Definition of a procedural framework with explicit definitions in the decision-making processes. of roles, of each stakeholder. Distinction of ownership and operational responsibilities. Conflicts of economic, societal or Integration of transport planning and land use decisions. environmental interests of Definition of assessment criteria and consultation procedures stakeholders. for interchange implementation. Shortcomings and gaps in the legal Break down of EU level transport policies to the practical level, framework to promote e.g. strategic spatial distribution and mode choices of comprehensive intermodal mobility interchanges. Explore the need for a harmonised European systems. regulatory frame for interconnections. Insufficient public resources to Targeting public sector funding schemes and instruments that finance terminal development facilitate private sector involvement. projects. Absence of a master plan for Regularly update “master plans” of interchanges. interchange terminals. Figure 3 Urban transport interchange place. Figure 4 City-HUB life-cycle. Figure 5 Interchange zones (based on Network Rail Station Zones 2011) Figure 6 City-HUB travellers´ satisfaction survey. Table 2 Satisfaction rates aggregated by categories Köbánya- Categories Moncloa Kamppi Ilford Thessaloniki Kispest Travel Information 3.69 3.92 3.44 3.61 3.37 Way-findings Information 3.81 3.50 3.26 3.70 3.26 Time and Movement 3.69 3.69 3.09 3.52 3.44 Access 4.19 4.29 3.33 4.32 3.73 Comfort & Convenience 3.35 3.59 2.99 3.41 2.95 Image & Attractiveness 3.77 3.27 2.50 3.56 2.16 Safety and Security 3.75 3.84 3.10 3.59 2.72 Emergency 3.45 3.42 2.88 3.70 2.90 Figure 7 Planning guidelines for efficient urban transport interchange City-HUB Model for Urban Transport Interchanges MONITORING & IDENTIFICATION VALIDATION & DEPLOYMENT ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS AND NEEDS INTERCHANGE URBAN INTEGRATION MONITORING PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS Achievement of policy goals Building design Local constraints Medium/long term cycle - Operators Users • Access/Egress zones • Location in the city socioeconomic and • Surrounding area features Transport As a transport • Facilities zones environmental effects activities node • Transfer zones • Development plan Continuous dialogue with stakeholders Services and Atmosphere HUB life HUB As a place Local impacts - • Safety and Security Facilities • Nearby shopping Feedback from users • Crowding • New housing and offices • Travellers´ surveys • Information & way-finding City • Job creation • Identification of Strengths and • Comfort and convenience Weaknesses Enhancing Performance • Update business model Policy goals definition Stakeholders involvement Business Model • New activities and • Roles and responsibilities • Cold / Hot developments • Financial performance • Partially integrated • Quality plan Stakeholders identification • Management • Fully integrated • Resources reallocation • Promote innovation Governance Figure 8 City-HUB MODEL process and elements. Table 3 Business model for urban interchanges. OFFER SIDE DEMAND SIDE Interaction Users’ Key Stakeholders Services Value propositions with users characteristics - Transport - Transport - Managing rapid - Facilities for - Travellers operators of modes transfer movements travellers Demand for different modes - Transfer among without congestion - Surrounding area each mode - Land developers different modes - Exposure to shops features and - Retailing, shops - Ticket selling - Quality waiting areas activities - Travellers - Cafes, - Luggage handling with good ICT - Different profile restaurants services - Coordination among information - age, gender - Builders, - Shopping and public authorities channels - frequency construction food services - Coordination with - trip purpose companies local business in the Resources Atmosphere - income level - Public transport area - disabled authorities - plattforms - Integration into the - Safety & Security City authorities area and location in - - ticket offices or - Information & - Non-travellers- the city - Regional machines way-finding using other authorities - waiting space - Development plan - Comfort and services - information - Continuous dialogue convenience offices/screens & with stakeholders - Entertainment other devices - commercial area - area for parking (cars, cycles, buses) Costs Revenues - Building: construction, maintenance - Fees for transport modes - Energy efficiency - Renting space for retail and other services - Operation and surveillance - Advertising Source: Based on HERMES business model structure. City-HUB Project Logo City-HUB Graphic. City-HUB Project Leaflet Objectives Consortium City-HUB project aims at: UNIVERSIDAD Spain POLITECNICA DE MADRID City-HUB project Testing and validating the City-HUB model for the (UPM-TRANSyT) improvement of integrated management approaches to intermodality, monitoring and KTI Hungary KOZLEKEDESTUDOMANYI operations across European countries; INTEZET NONPROFIT KFT Achieving efficient urban interchanges, reducing (KTI) their carbon footprint, maximizing the value of TRANSPORTOKONOMISK Norway new technologies for mobility, communications and INSTITUTT (TOI) virtual travel, reducing accidents and encouraging healthier lifestyles; CENTER FOR RESEARCH & Greece Achieving the widespread implementation of TECHNOLOGY HELLAS / integrated mobility policies for all-providing more HELLENIC INSTITUTE OF opportunities for citizens to access jobs, TRANSPORT (CERTH/HIT) healthcare, education and training, retail opportunities as well as leisure facilities; PANTEIA BV (NEA) The Achieving widespread acceptance of public Netherlands transport planning that meets social, environmental and mobility efficiency criteria in TRL LIMITED (TRL) United the most economical and effective way; Kingdom Making a full contribution to the development of TEKNOLOGIAN Finland intermodality standards, minimum requirements, TUTKIMUSKESKUS VTT quality management, benchmark examples and (VTT) public transport service level in Europe. www.cityhub-project.eu INSTITUT FRANCAIS DES France SCIENCES ET Expected impact TECHNOLOGIES DES TRANSPORTS, DE City-HUB is expected to encourage: L'AMENAGEMENT ET DES RESEAUX (IFSTTAR) Complementarity between modes and operations, CENTRUM DOPRAVNIHO Czech enhancing intermodality; VYZKUMU v.v.i. (CDV) Republic Coordination between modes and operators; Creation of people-focused seamless and energy efficient journeys in the urban region catchment area; Energy efficient urban network performance, using Project coordinator: footprint measurement methods; Increase of economic viability using public rules Professor Andrés Monzón and private funding; Director of TRANSyT Project supported by: Creation of business case that stimulates local Transport Research Center economy; Universidad Politecnica de Madrid Pan-European transferability; and Prof. Aranguren s/n - 28040 Madrid Achievement of land use and urban transport T.: +34 91 336 5373 infrastructure integration. Email: [email protected] Pilot case studies Validation case studies Why City-HUB? The solutions that the project will propose for effective and 5 case studies will be studied in order to identify smart design and integrated management will be validated Urban transport interchanges play best practices, barriers and areas of through six case studies. The City-HUB model will also be improvement related with ITS solutions, efficient simulated in the specific case studies: a key role as part of public transport design and planning, and integrated Cornella centre, Barcelona, Spain networks, facilitating the links between management: The Cornella centre is located in Plaça de l'Estació, central public transportation modes, such as the Moncloa interchange, Madrid, Spain Cornellà de Llobregat, which is a municipality in the connection between bus and subway or Moncloa Interchange is located in the city center southern half of the metropolitan area of Barcelona. The of Madrid, offering several mobility options, such population is approximately 0.1 million citizens. The centre metropolitan railway. Time saving, urban involves several transportation modes, such as metro, as: metro (2 lines), local buses (20 lines), regional commuter train, tram, local and regional buses. integration, better use of waiting time and buses (74 lines), long-distance buses (1 line) and improvement of operational business Prague terminus Dejvicka, Prague, Czech Republic taxis. The hub is furthermore easily accessed on The Dejvicka terminal is the main interchange point for models are some of the benefits that result foot and by bicycle. travelers coming from/to the Prague airport. The from the development of efficient urban Ilford railway station, Redbridge, London, transportation modes involved in the terminal are metro/ interchanges. UK underground, interurban and urban buses, airport bus, lford railway station is a suburban tram/light rail, taxi, kiss and ride, walking and cycling. However,