2018 Annual Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2018 Annual Report Federation for American Immigration Reform 2018 Annual Report CONTENTS 1 A Message from the Chairman 3 A Message from the President 7 Introduction 9 Research and Publications 13 FAIR In the Media 19 Digital Communications 25 Community Engagement 27 Legislative Resources 31 Member Education and Service 33 Financials FAIR is dedicated to promoting public understanding and critical thinking about immigration’s impact on every aspect of life in America. Our mission is to examine immigration trends and effects, to educate the American peo- ple on the impacts of sustained high-volume immigration, and to discern, put forward, and advocate immigration policies that will best serve American environmental, societal, and economic interests today and into the future. United with and supported by concerned citizens who are willing to take action to secure our nation’s future, we fight battles across the country against those who would exploit the national immigration policy to enhance their private interests or political power. • Record number of op-eds published in In 2018, immigration policy leading print and online journals dominated the news from • Groundbreaking studies of key aspects of immigration policy start to finish. • Greater policy influence at the state and local level through citizen activists A government shutdown over border securi- ty funding; organized “caravans” of migrants All of this was made possible by the hard work intent on exploiting our asylum laws; self-im- of FAIR’s dedicated staff and by our generous posed limitations on detention of migrants donors who supported our work in 2018. that led to separation of families at the bor- der; surges of unaccompanied minors; and Once again, FAIR’s signature event was our growing caseloads that threaten to paralyze annual “Hold Their Feet to the Fire” (F2F) ra- our federal judiciary, to name just a few. dio row. F2F 2018 was the largest and most successful such event to date, drawing more Against this backdrop of chaos and crisis, than 60 national and local talk radio hosts FAIR demonstrated its metal. During the who broadcast to listeners in all 50 states. course of the year, FAIR consulted closely Our social media reach – and increasingly with policymakers in the White House and important educational and advocacy tools – leading congressional figures seeking com- also grew. With more than 2 million Facebook monsense solutions to the nation’s immigra- followers, 293 thousand Twitter followers, and tion crises. FAIR provided a steady stream of 50 million YouTube views, FAIR not only has analysis of breaking events in the media, of- the ability to reach unprecedented numbers ten as the lone counterbalance to misleading of people directly, but generate thousands of coverage by the mainstream media itself. “shares” for our blogs and published op-eds. At the same time, FAIR fulfilled its education- This ability to reach ever-growing numbers al mission by turning out reports and stud- of Americans with commonsense ideas for ies about a wide array of immigration issues. true immigration reform translates into our And, around the country, FAIR worked with ability to influence policy decisions at all lev- citizens to enact state and local laws aimed els of government. at protecting the public interest, while fighting back against efforts to protect and reward im- On behalf of the entire FAIR Board of Directors, migration lawbreakers. Also, at the local lev- we are proud to be a part of the important el, FAIR solidified its relationship with sheriffs contributions we made in 2018 on an issue and other law enforcement departments. that is critical to the future of our country. In 2018, FAIR’s role in shaping U.S. immigra- tion policy included: • Frequent contact with high level poli- cymakers in the Executive Branch and high profile members of Congress Donald Collins, Jr. • Unprecedented traditional and social Chairman, Board of Directors media access to the American public FAIR 2018 Annual Report | 1 millions – shared understanding and com- “Energy directed by a unified mitment to ensure the existential threat that exists through uncontrolled borders can be will is almost the definition of brought back under some sensible controls. genius.” – W. Durant Our on-line engagement program contin- ues to grow every day. Innovative educa- So it was in 2018, as FAIR worked tirelessly tional content keeps tens of thousands of to educate the public on the wisdom behind Americans interested and engaged on a re- the needed policy reforms that would pre- curring basis. Our presence on radio, print vent the very crisis that emerged all along and TV (in an altered landscape) hit new our southern border. Anchored by a sym- heights. pathetic White House, FAIR members and activists reached across the country in the Indeed, FAIR reached new summits in its ed- single-minded pursuit of goals long-estab- ucational outreach undertakings. Major in- lished by commission after commission: structional videos on such topics as “chain Reduced immigration under policies that will migration” and “border operations” reached ensure respect for law as a cornerstone of millions of viewers, while innovative target- citizenship. ed initiatives brought activist opportunities to subpopulations that normally do not get As immigration policy touches on all aspects to hear tailored messages. The nimble field of American life, so the public debate over education programs help bring public un- immigration affects all Americans in all sta- derstanding of even the most sophisticated tions and circumstances. 2018 brought a policy questions to the minds of Americans renewed debate at a fever pitch, driven by in communities across the country. vocal politicians and the unrelenting driving force of people with everything to gain and Our work could never be possible without nothing to lose by making the attempt to get the committed membership and dedicated here. activists who put aside their time and talents to be a force multiplier in countering the ir- At the beginning of 2018, we fully expected responsible actions of cheap labor interests to see major changes and perhaps even sig- and professional power brokers. 2018 was a nificant action in the Congress to bring our year that produced significant action within laws up to date. But alas, as John Keegan the Executive Branch, and all of us played observed (with reference to the Schlieffen a role in helping ensure those activities pro- plan), “Plans do not determine outcomes.” duced the best possible results. My hat is off So it was that the political deadlock prevent- to each and every one of you. ed effective action at a time when it would have made the most difference. Yet we pro- ceed undaunted into the future. Throughout this year, FAIR reached out to affected Americans and impact communi- ties with our broad public education initia- tives. Engagement is the watchword as we Dan Stein continue to build a national network in the FAIR President FAIR 2018 Annual Report | 3 “Here is your country. Cherish these natural wonders, cherish the natural resources, cherish the history and romance as a sacred heritage, for your children and your children’s children. Do not let selfish men or greedy interests skin your country of its beauty, its riches or its romance.” ― Theodore Roosevelt, 1907 There were many exciting developments Founded in 1979, the in 2018: refugee admissions were reduced considerably and more stringent limitations Federation for American to asylum claims were imposed; sanctions were levied against nations that refused to Immigration Reform (FAIR) take back deported citizens, and immigra- tion judges were ordered to discontinue the has worked for nearly four practice of administratively closing immi- gration cases—long considered an “amnes- decades to educate the ty by stealth.” Best of all, in June 2018, the Supreme Court released its ruling in Trump public about the critical v. Hawaii which upheld the Trump adminis- tration’s travel ban on aliens from countries need for sound immigration linked to terrorism. policies which would bring Of course, as the victories have grown, so have the challenges. In 2018, immigration population flows to a more maximalists continued to obstruct other meaningful reforms in the interest of fulfill- natural level. ing their base agendas: Big business and Big agriculture pushed for a steady stream After all, this is the only way the U.S. can of cheap, low-skilled labor. Meanwhile, sup- conserve its lands and natural resources, porters of open borders hung their hopes of sustain its considerable system of public future electoral success on massive amnes- services and infrastructural developments ty proposals in more attempts to guarantee and, most importantly, maintain its right to a loyal voting base for decades to come. national self-determination in the 21st cen- tury. FAIR responded at every step. Backed by our grassroots base of nearly 3 million, and The events of 2018 confirmed FAIR’s long- wearing our hard-earned reputation as one standing conviction that immigration is the of the only single-issue organizations in defining issue of our time. This has been mir- Washington, D.C. which has committed it- rored by the present administration, which self to entirely honest immigration reporting rose to victory in 2016 on a platform buoyed and analysis—In 2018, FAIR was a force to almost entirely by the issue of uncontrolled be reckoned with. We now have a prominent mass immigration. This remained the con- seat at the table, and an audible voice, in all sistent focus of the Trump administration— substantial immigration reform discussions and the general public—throughout 2018. nationwide. FAIR 2018 Annual Report | 7 The Fiscal Cost of Resettling Refugees in FAIR’s Research Department the United States is a core component of our This groundbreaking online study outlines the cost of refugee resettlement to U.S.
Recommended publications
  • Book of Abstracts
    Fourth Biennial EAAS Women’s Network Symposium Feminisms in American Studies in/and Crisis: Where Do We Go from Here? April 28 and 29, 2021 BOOK OF ABSTRACTS EAAS Women’s Network [email protected] http://women.eaas.eu IN COLLABORATION WITH 2 INTERSECTIONAL FEMINISM AND LITERATURE: THINKING THROUGH “UGLY FEELINGS”? Gabrielle Adjerad In light of what has been institutionalized in the nineties as “intersectionality” (Crenshaw, 1989), but emanated from a long tradition of feminism fostered by women of color (Hill-Collins, Bilge, 2016), feminist theory has increasingly shed light on the plurality of women’s experiences, the inseparable, overlapping and simultaneous differences constituting their identities, and the materiality of the various dominations engendered. At the turn of the twenty-first century, this paradigm seems compelling to address fictional diasporic narratives addressing the diverse discriminations encountered by migrant women and their descendants in the United States. However, adopting an intersectional feminist approach of literature, for research or in the classroom, raises methodological issues that this paper contends with. Some thinkers have considered the double pitfall of considering, on the one hand, the text as a mimetic document of plural lives and, on the other, of essentializing a symbolical “écriture feminine” (Felski, 1989). Some have highlighted the necessary critical movement between the archetypal dimension of gender and the social and historical individuals diversely affected by this ideology (De Lauretis, 1987). Yet, beyond this tension between an attention paid to abstraction on the one hand and experience on the other, we can consider that hegemony is made of different ideologies that may contradict one another (Balibar, Wallerstein, 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2020 Remarks in a Meeting With
    Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2020 Remarks in a Meeting With African American Leaders and an Exchange With Reporters February 27, 2020 The President. Well, I want to thank you very much. We're here with some of the Black leaders of our country and people that are highly respected and people that have done a fantastic job and, for the most part, have been working on this whole situation with me right from the beginning. Participants. Yes. Yes. The President. And we've done a lot. We've done Opportunity Zones. We've done criminal justice reform. We've done things that people didn't even think possible. Criminal justice reform—we've let a lot of great people out of jail. Participants. Yes! [Applause] The President. And you know, Alice Johnson is, really, just such a great example. A fine woman. And she doesn't say she didn't do it; she made a mistake. But she was in there for 22 years when we let her out, and she had practically another 20 left. Participant. She did. The President. And that's not appropriate. Alveda King Ministries Founder Alveda C. King. Her children grew up, her grandbabies. The President. Yes, I know. So incredible. And you couldn't produce—there's nobody is Hollywood that could have produced that last scene of her. Ms. King. Amen. Amazing. The President. That was the real deal—of her when she saw her kids. So it's really a fantastic thing. So what I think I do is I'd like to—for the media, I'd like to go around the room, and we can do just a quick introduction of each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitol Insurrection at Center of Conservative Movement
    Capitol Insurrection At Center Of Conservative Movement: At Least 43 Governors, Senators And Members Of Congress Have Ties To Groups That Planned January 6th Rally And Riots. SUMMARY: On January 6, 2021, a rally in support of overturning the results of the 2020 presidential election “turned deadly” when thousands of people stormed the U.S. Capitol at Donald Trump’s urging. Even Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, who rarely broke with Trump, has explicitly said, “the mob was fed lies. They were provoked by the President and other powerful people.” These “other powerful people” include a vast array of conservative officials and Trump allies who perpetuated false claims of fraud in the 2020 election after enjoying critical support from the groups that fueled the Capitol riot. In fact, at least 43 current Governors or elected federal office holders have direct ties to the groups that helped plan the January 6th rally, along with at least 15 members of Donald Trump’s former administration. The links that these Trump-allied officials have to these groups are: Turning Point Action, an arm of right-wing Turning Point USA, claimed to send “80+ buses full of patriots” to the rally that led to the Capitol riot, claiming the event would be one of the most “consequential” in U.S. history. • The group spent over $1.5 million supporting Trump and his Georgia senate allies who claimed the election was fraudulent and supported efforts to overturn it. • The organization hosted Trump at an event where he claimed Democrats were trying to “rig the election,” which he said would be “the most corrupt election in the history of our country.” • At a Turning Point USA event, Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • The Qanon Conspiracy
    THE QANON CONSPIRACY: Destroying Families, Dividing Communities, Undermining Democracy THE QANON CONSPIRACY: PRESENTED BY Destroying Families, Dividing Communities, Undermining Democracy NETWORK CONTAGION RESEARCH INSTITUTE POLARIZATION AND EXTREMISM RESEARCH POWERED BY (NCRI) INNOVATION LAB (PERIL) Alex Goldenberg Brian Hughes Lead Intelligence Analyst, The Network Contagion Research Institute Caleb Cain Congressman Denver Riggleman Meili Criezis Jason Baumgartner Kesa White The Network Contagion Research Institute Cynthia Miller-Idriss Lea Marchl Alexander Reid-Ross Joel Finkelstein Director, The Network Contagion Research Institute Senior Research Fellow, Miller Center for Community Protection and Resilience, Rutgers University SPECIAL THANKS TO THE PERIL QANON ADVISORY BOARD Jaclyn Fox Sarah Hightower Douglas Rushkoff Linda Schegel THE QANON CONSPIRACY ● A CONTAGION AND IDEOLOGY REPORT FOREWORD “A lie doesn’t become truth, wrong doesn’t become right, and evil doesn’t become good just because it’s accepted by the majority.” –Booker T. Washington As a GOP Congressman, I have been uniquely positioned to experience a tumultuous two years on Capitol Hill. I voted to end the longest government shut down in history, was on the floor during impeachment, read the Mueller Report, governed during the COVID-19 pandemic, officiated a same-sex wedding (first sitting GOP congressman to do so), and eventually became the only Republican Congressman to speak out on the floor against the encroaching and insidious digital virus of conspiracy theories related to QAnon. Certainly, I can list the various theories that nest under the QAnon banner. Democrats participate in a deep state cabal as Satan worshiping pedophiles and harvesting adrenochrome from children. President-Elect Joe Biden ordered the killing of Seal Team 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Digital Political Advertising Network
    PLATFORMS AND OUTSIDERS IN PARTY NETWORKS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE DIGITAL POLITICAL ADVERTISING NETWORK Bridget Barrett A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at the Hussman School of Journalism and Media. Chapel Hill 2020 Approved by: Daniel Kreiss Adam Saffer Adam Sheingate © 2020 Bridget Barrett ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Bridget Barrett: Platforms and Outsiders in Party Networks: The Evolution of the Digital Political Advertising Network (Under the direction of Daniel Kreiss) Scholars seldom examine the companies that campaigns hire to run digital advertising. This thesis presents the first network analysis of relationships between federal political committees (n = 2,077) and the companies they hired for electoral digital political advertising services (n = 1,034) across 13 years (2003–2016) and three election cycles (2008, 2012, and 2016). The network expanded from 333 nodes in 2008 to 2,202 nodes in 2016. In 2012 and 2016, Facebook and Google had the highest normalized betweenness centrality (.34 and .27 in 2012 and .55 and .24 in 2016 respectively). Given their positions in the network, Facebook and Google should be considered consequential members of party networks. Of advertising agencies hired in the 2016 electoral cycle, 23% had no declared political specialization and were hired disproportionately by non-incumbents. The thesis argues their motivations may not be as well-aligned with party goals as those of established political professionals. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES .................................................................................................................... V POLITICAL CONSULTING AND PARTY NETWORKS ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A New Vision
    Page 14 | Thursday, March 5, 2020 | Shiner GAZETTE HULL CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1 EVENT CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1 a little brightness to best of GPAs and person- been more excited when both biological sisters— his campaign across the state and national events what could otherwise be alities doesn’t guarantee she got accepted, but she are live-stream video country, and they soon ex- RWOYA attends each dark times for many. a spot. was plum elated when bloggers, social media panded their own brand year, D’Amico and her Of course, chalking That’s why Holly and they called again for the personalities, political of commonsense, con- members were hooked. up volunteer experience her dad started search- coming year, inviting her activists and Fox Na- servative commentary Still, booking the likes never hurt anyone, ei- ing out places online that back as youth leader. tion hosts. They are best nationwide. They rose to of someone with their na- ther. might give her a bit of an Even participating in the known for their unique even greater prominence tional stature wasn’t sim- As mentioned before, edge as she looked to her interview process helped and outspoken support in April 2018, when they ple. Especially when you just getting accepted future. They found the her tremendously, Holly of President Trump. testified before Congress consider that Diamond into a collegiate physical program on the medical said. They grew up in Fay- on claims that Facebook and Silk are normally on therapy program nowa- center’s website. “I got to hear from etteville, N.C., and pri- had blocked and/or cen- tour with President of days is no small feat.
    [Show full text]
  • Reportedly at the Hands of White Nationalists
    TRUMP AND HIS SURROGATES LOUDLY PEDDLED DEBUNKED RIGHT-WING CONSPIRACY THEORIES TIED TO QANON AND WHITE SUPREMACISTS, GIVING THEM FALSE LEGITIMACY SUMMARY As Trump and his allies searched for justifications to claim electoral victory, the far-right online community played a pivotal role in originating claims for the campaign to push. Conspiracies from white supremacists, QAnon supporters, and long-time conspiracy theorists were elevated, disseminated, and pushed out by the president and his allies. There seems to be a direct flow from the furthest right reaches of the internet and the official spokespeople of the president —including the president himself — such as: • The president promoting numerical figures developed by “TheDonald.Win” — an online community founded to openly post hate speech and calls to violence — in an attempt to prove his false voter fraud claims. • Promoting “Stop The Steal” events planned by white supremacists, including one that led to a stabbing reportedly at the hands of white nationalists. • Lending credibility to the mysterious, propagandic twitter account “Election Wizard,” which promotes election conspiracy theories and follows noted white supremacists and QAnon accounts. • Using a QAnon promoted conspiracy to fire a top elections cybersecurity official. TABLE OF CONTENTS Donald Trump Promoted Numerical Figures Developed By “TheDonald.Win”—An Online Community Founded To Openly Post Hate Speech And Calls To Violence In An Attempt To Prove His False Voter Fraud Claims ................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • BY Galen Stocking, Patrick Van Kessel, Michael Barthel, Katerina Eva Matsa and Maya Khuzam
    FOR RELEASE SEPTEMBER 28, 2020 BY Galen Stocking, Patrick van Kessel, Michael Barthel, Katerina Eva Matsa and Maya Khuzam FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES: Katerina Eva Matsa, Associate Director, Journalism Research Galen Stocking, Senior Computational Social Scientist Hannah Klein, Communications Manager Andrew Grant, Communications Associate 202.419.4372 www.pewresearch.org RECOMMENDED CITATION Pew Research Center, September, 2020, “Many Americans Get News on YouTube, Where News Organizations and Independent Producers Thrive Side by Side” 1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER About Pew Research Center Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It does not take policy positions. The Center conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, content analysis and other data-driven social science research. It studies U.S. politics and policy; journalism and media; internet, science and technology; religion and public life; Hispanic trends; global attitudes and trends; and U.S. social and demographic trends. All of the Center’s reports are available at www.pewresearch.org. Pew Research Center is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts, its primary funder. © Pew Research Center 2020 www.pewresearch.org 2 PEW RESEARCH CENTER Terminology [FORMAT AS DROPDOWN BOX W/LINK] This study explores the landscape of news on YouTube through a survey of YouTube news consumers alongside an analysis of the most popular YouTube channels that produce news and the videos published by a subset of these channels. Here are some definitions of key terms used throughout this report: ▪ YouTube news consumers: Those who said they get news from YouTube in a Pew Research Center survey of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Barr Testimony Fox News
    Barr Testimony Fox News Hydrophilous and resorbent Alton discases: which Tucker is preachiest enough? Unpeopled Ambrosius nodded no epilation embrocating flirtingly after Guillaume blares anywhere, quite hotshot. Gainly aphidious, Gilbert apologized depravations and muzz moiety. And barr testimony fox news channel will be material contained a michigan legislature, when they want is a republican colleagues as vice president. Republican congressman lewis, residents who are using their testimony features of groups like me. William Barr to stop Street Journal I'm guarding presidency. Bill Barr responds to face Trump said give him on Fox News 0220 Elie Honig is a CNN legal analyst and former federal and state prosecutor. Mueller was also urged an inexperienced political. Admit it Fox News not been right topic along Anchorage Daily. Parnas publicly accused him into new jersey as tying his testimony you testify publicly about investigating trump. Even William Barr knew Trump being crazy after his election loss. It comes a sitting us attorney general bill is unclear when bill barr what enemies have you guys get barr had made several states postal service. In a hearing on his testimony today that about them this claim why barr testimony fox news personality. The mueller investigation showing riots and that that i had previously said. Attorney General Barr condemns rioting at House hearing News. 'The Five' reacts to Barr's House Judiciary testimony Democrats 'just landscape to tell Bill Barr' Watters says 'unprofessional' Democrats 'were. Robinson It's Mueller time Mueller's public enemy must. China has also. Barr told Sean Hannity on Fox News that Democrats' drive seeking to.
    [Show full text]
  • President Trump's First Term
    The Year in C-SPAN Archives Research Volume 5 Article 1 2-15-2020 President Trump’s First Term: The Year in C-SPAN Archives Research, Volume 5 Robert X. Browning Purdue University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ccse Part of the American Politics Commons Recommended Citation Browning, Robert X. (2020) "President Trump’s First Term: The Year in C-SPAN Archives Research, Volume 5," The Year in C-SPAN Archives Research: Vol. 5 , Article 1. Available at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ccse/vol5/iss1/1 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. President Trump’s First Term: The Year in C-SPAN Archives Research, Volume 5 Cover Page Footnote To purchase a hard copy of this publication, visit: http://www.thepress.purdue.edu/titles/format/ 9781557538826 This article is available in The Year in C-SPAN Archives Research: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ccse/vol5/iss1/1 “For almost 25 years I have watched the C-SPAN Video Library evolve into the nonpareil of data on congressional institutional behavior. Most instructors of the legislative process have utilized the C-SPAN’s material in the classroom with great success. Here, in this volume, Robert X. Browning once again demonstrates the myriad ways scholars can advance conventional wisdom on the U.S. Congress and institutions with the C-SPAN Video Library’s seemingly unlimited data. Debates, hearings, and floor speeches are just a few fascinating resources that are brilliantly used in this volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Mail-In Voter Fraud: Anatomy of a Disinformation Campaign
    Mail-In Voter Fraud: Anatomy of a Disinformation Campaign The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Benkler, Yochai, Casey Tilton, Bruce Etling, Hal Roberts, Justin Clark, et al. Mail-In Voter Fraud: Anatomy of a Disinformation Campaign, 2020. Citable link https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37365484 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Mail-in Voter Fraud: Anatomy of a Disinformation Campaign The Disinformation Campaign Surrounding the Risk of Voter Fraud Associated with Mail-in Ballots Follows an Elite-Driven, Mass Media Model; Social Media Plays a Secondary Role in 2020. Yochai Benkler, Casey Tilton, Bruce Etling, Hal Roberts, Justin Clark, Robert Faris, Jonas Kaiser, and Carolyn Schmitt1 ​ SUMMARY AND OVERVIEW The claim that election fraud is a major concern with mail-in ballots has become the central threat to election participation during the Covid-19 pandemic and to the legitimacy of the outcome of the election across the political spectrum. President Trump has repeatedly cited his concerns over voter fraud associated with mail-in ballots as a reason that he may not abide by an adverse electoral outcome. Polling conducted in September 2020 suggests that nearly half of Republicans agree with the president that election fraud is a major concern associated with expanded mail-in voting during the pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulating Political Parties European Democracies in Comparative Perspective
    Regulating Political Parties European Democracies in Comparative Perspective REGULATING POLITICAL PARTIES European Democracies in Comparative Perspective Edited by Ingrid van Biezen & Hans-Martien ten Napel Leiden University Press Cover design: Suzan Beijer Layout: CO2 Premedia ISBN 978 90 8728 218 9 e-ISBN 978 94 0060 195 6 (e-pdf) e-ISBN 978 94 0060 196 3 (e-pub) NUR 754 © Ingrid van Biezen / Hans-Martien ten Napel /Leiden University Press, 2014 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owner and the author of the book. Th is book is distributed in North America by the University of Chicago Press (www.press.uchicago.edu). Table of contents Introduction 7 Ingrid van Biezen & Hans-Martien ten Napel Chapter 1: Democracy and the Legal Regulation of Political Parties 17 Richard S. Katz Chapter 2: Dilemmas of Regulating Political Finance, with Special Reference to the Dutch Case 45 Ruud Koole Chapter 3: Lessons from the Past: Party Regulation in the Netherlands 71 Remco Nehmelman Chapter 4: Th e Constitutionalization of Political Parties in Post-war Europe 93 Ingrid van Biezen Chapter 5: Party Laws in Comparative Perspective 119 Fernando Casal Bértoa, Daniela R. Piccio & Ekaterina R. Rashkova Chapter 6: Explaining Legislative Confl ict over the Adoption of Political Financing Law in the European Union 149 Wojciech Gagatek Chapter 7: Th e SGP Case: Did it Really (Re)Launch the Debate on Party Regulation in the Netherlands 181 Hans-Martien ten Napel & Jaco van den Brink Chapter 8: Will it All End in Tears? What Really Happens when Democracies Use Law to Ban Political Parties 195 Tim Bale table of contents Chapter 9: Ethnic Party Regulation in Eastern Europe 225 Ekaterina R.
    [Show full text]