DOCSLIB.ORG

Significant Pressures Identified in the Sava River Basin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Significant Pressures Identified in the Sava River Basin Sava River Basin Management Plan Background paper No. 3 Significant pressures identified in the Sava River Basin March 2013 Supported by the Sava River Basin Management Plan Table of contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 2 Criteria for assessment of point pollution sources ................................ 2 2.1 Agglomerations and Urban Wastewaters Treatment Plants - Criteria of significance, load and efficiency of wastewater treatment ..................................................... 2 2.2 Food industry – Criteria of significance ......................................................................................... 3 2.3 Industrial wastewaters - Direct and indirect discharges ........................................................ 3 2.4 Application of criteria for identification of significant industrial pollution sources .... 6 2.5 Water abstractions ................................................................................................................................. 7 2.6 Pollution sources - data collection ................................................................................................... 8 3 Pressures and measures - data overview by countries ....................... 9 3.1 Urban wastewater disposal in agglomerations ≥ 2,000 PE in the Sava River Basin ............................................................................................................................................... 9 3.1.1 Slovenia ..................................................................................................................... 10 3.1.1.1 Reference year 2007 ............................................................................................ 10 3.1.1.2 Pollution reduction scenarios .......................................................................... 12 3.1.2 Croatia ....................................................................................................................... 13 3.1.2.1 Reference year 2007 ............................................................................................ 13 3.1.2.2 Pollution reduction scenarios .......................................................................... 15 3.1.3 Bosnia and Herzegovina ..................................................................................... 17 3.1.3.1 Reference year 2007 ............................................................................................ 17 3.1.3.2 Pollution reduction scenarios .......................................................................... 19 3.1.4 Serbia ......................................................................................................................... 20 3.1.4.1 Reference year 2007 ............................................................................................ 20 3.1.4.2 Pollution reduction scenarios .......................................................................... 22 3.1.5 Montenegro ............................................................................................................. 24 3.1.5.1 Reference year 2007 ............................................................................................ 24 3.1.5.2 Pollution reduction scenarios .......................................................................... 25 3.1.6 Sava River Basin .................................................................................................... 27 3.1.6.1 Reference year 2007 ............................................................................................ 27 3.1.6.2 Pollution reduction scenarios .......................................................................... 39 3.1.6.2.1 Organic pollution reduction...................................................................... 39 3.1.6.2.2 Nutrient pollution reduction .................................................................... 46 3.2 Industrial pollution sources in Sava River Basin ..................................................................... 48 Background paper No.3: Significant pressures identified in the Sava RB Sava River Basin Management Plan 3.3 Agriculture .............................................................................................................................................. 53 4 Assessment of impact from diffuse pollution sources ....................... 55 4.1 Description of the proposed risk assessment methodology for nutrient diffuse pollution estimation ............................................................................................................................ 55 4.2 Advantages and disadvantages of the proposed methodology .......................................... 57 4.3 Risk analysis of the impact from diffuse pollution sources ................................................. 58 4.4 Quantification of nutrient emissions from diffuse pollution sources .............................. 61 4.5 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................................ 62 5 The Sava River Basin MONERIS results ................................................... 63 5.1 Overview of methodologies ............................................................................................................. 63 5.2 MOdelling Nutrient Emissions in RIver Systems ..................................................................... 63 5.3 OECD Modified methodology - Slovenian case study............................................................. 64 5.3.1 Calculation of nitrogen balance ....................................................................... 65 5.3.2 Phosphorus balance ............................................................................................. 66 5.4 Soil and Water Assessment Tool - SWAT .................................................................................... 68 5.5 QUAL2K Model ...................................................................................................................................... 72 5.6 Methodology for risk analysis of diffuse pollution sources (DPS RA) ............................. 74 5.7 Advantages and disadvantages of the used models ............................................................... 74 5.7.1 MONERIS .................................................................................................................. 74 5.7.2 SWAT ......................................................................................................................... 75 5.7.3 QUAL2K ..................................................................................................................... 75 5.7.4 OECD modified methodology ........................................................................... 75 5.7.5 Methodology for risk analysis of diffuse pollution sources (DPS RA) .............................................................................................................................. 75 5.8 The Sava River Basin nutrient balance – MONERIS results ................................................. 78 5.9 Estimation of Sava River contribution of nutrients into the Danube River .................. 78 5.10 Comparison of various approaches of nutrient pollution balance assessment in the Sava RB ................................................................................................................ 79 6 References ......................................................................................................... 80 Background paper No.3: Significant pressures identified in the Sava RB Sava River Basin Management Plan List of Tables Table 1: List of pollutants to be reported if threshold values are exceeded (IPPC, Annex II) .................................................................................................................... 4 Table 2: Simplified criteria for determination of significant industrial pollution sources ................................................................................................................. 5 Table 3: Criteria for identification of significant agricultural point sources ................. 6 Table 4: Relevant industrial sectors in ME and BA (Republika Srpska) for identification of significant industrial sources ........................................................ 6 Table 5: SI - Overview of agglomerations in the Sava RB .................................................. 10 Table 6: SI - Level of urban wastewater collection - ref. year 2007 ............................... 11 Table 7: SI - Level of urban wastewater treatment - ref. year 2007 .............................. 11 Table 8: SI - Pollution from agglomerations emitted into environment ...................... 12 Table 9: SI - Overview of pollution emissions reduction ................................................... 12 Table 10: HR – Overview of agglomerations in the Sava RB ............................................... 14 Table 11: HR - Level of urban wastewater collection ............................................................ 14 Table 12: HR - Level of urban wastewater treatment - ref. year 2007 ............................ 15 Table 13: HR - Pollution from agglomerations emitted into environment .................... 15 Table 14: HR - Overview of pollution emissions reduction ................................................. 16 Table 15: BA - Overview of agglomerations in the Sava RB ...............................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FEEFHS Journal Volume VII No. 1-2 1999
    FEEFHS Quarterly A Journal of Central & Bast European Genealogical Studies FEEFHS Quarterly Volume 7, nos. 1-2 FEEFHS Quarterly Who, What and Why is FEEFHS? Tue Federation of East European Family History Societies Editor: Thomas K. Ecllund. [email protected] (FEEFHS) was founded in June 1992 by a small dedicated group Managing Editor: Joseph B. Everett. [email protected] of American and Canadian genealogists with diverse ethnic, reli- Contributing Editors: Shon Edwards gious, and national backgrounds. By the end of that year, eleven Daniel Schlyter societies bad accepted its concept as founding members. Each year Emily Schulz since then FEEFHS has doubled in size. FEEFHS nows represents nearly two hundred organizations as members from twenty-four FEEFHS Executive Council: states, five Canadian provinces, and fourteen countries. lt contin- 1998-1999 FEEFHS officers: ues to grow. President: John D. Movius, c/o FEEFHS (address listed below). About half of these are genealogy societies, others are multi-pur- [email protected] pose societies, surname associations, book or periodical publish- 1st Vice-president: Duncan Gardiner, C.G., 12961 Lake Ave., ers, archives, libraries, family history centers, on-line services, in- Lakewood, OH 44107-1533. [email protected] stitutions, e-mail genealogy list-servers, heraldry societies, and 2nd Vice-president: Laura Hanowski, c/o Saskatchewan Genealogi- other ethnic, religious, and national groups. FEEFHS includes or- cal Society, P.0. Box 1894, Regina, SK, Canada S4P 3EI ganizations representing all East or Central European groups that [email protected] have existing genealogy societies in North America and a growing 3rd Vice-president: Blanche Krbechek, 2041 Orkla Drive, group of worldwide organizations and individual members, from Minneapolis, MN 55427-3429.
    [Show full text]
  • ACTIVE FLOOD DEFENCE in CROATIA: Regulatory Framework, Roles & Responsibilities
    Workshop on Flood Risk Management measures & links to EU WFD November 11-12, 2015, Zagreb, Croatia ACTIVE FLOOD DEFENCE IN CROATIA: regulatory framework, roles & responsibilities Zoran Đurokovi ć, M.Sc.C.E. Croatian Waters Main Flood Protection Centre Head of Main Centre ∗ Climate change has intensified in recent years worldwide, including Croatia ∗ Extremely dry and wet periods have been alternating frequently in the last approximately 15 years ∗ Damage from extreme hydrological events is increasing ∗ “Average” or “normal” years are becoming increasingly rarer ∗ The frequency of high water waves and extreme water levels including floods is increasing ∗ There are almost no longer any rules concerning the occurrence of high water waves ∗ Forecasting climate models indicate increasingly frequent extreme climate events, both globally and locally ∗ Only in the last 15 years or so, the major part of the Croatian territory has experienced frequent extreme hydrological events which caused droughts in the years 2000, 2003, 2011 and 2012, but also floods in the years 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 ∗ Heavy damage is recorded, primarily in agriculture, but settlements, infrastructure and industrial facilities are also at risk ∗ Still, unlike in many other countries, major fatalities and disastrous damage in the urban areas have been avoided in Croatia ∗ Floods are natural phenomena which cannot be completely prevented. However, flood risks can be reduced to an acceptable level through constant development of flood
    [Show full text]
  • Vladimir-Peter-Goss-The-Beginnings
    Vladimir Peter Goss THE BEGINNINGS OF CROATIAN ART Published by Ibis grafika d.o.o. IV. Ravnice 25 Zagreb, Croatia Editor Krešimir Krnic This electronic edition is published in October 2020. This is PDF rendering of epub edition of the same book. ISBN 978-953-7997-97-7 VLADIMIR PETER GOSS THE BEGINNINGS OF CROATIAN ART Zagreb 2020 Contents Author’s Preface ........................................................................................V What is “Croatia”? Space, spirit, nature, culture ....................................1 Rome in Illyricum – the first historical “Pre-Croatian” landscape ...11 Creativity in Croatian Space ..................................................................35 Branimir’s Croatia ...................................................................................75 Zvonimir’s Croatia .................................................................................137 Interlude of the 12th c. and the Croatia of Herceg Koloman ............165 Et in Arcadia Ego ...................................................................................231 The catastrophe of Turkish conquest ..................................................263 Croatia Rediviva ....................................................................................269 Forest City ..............................................................................................277 Literature ................................................................................................303 List of Illustrations ................................................................................324
    [Show full text]
  • MINISTARSTVO ZAŠTITE OKOLIŠA I ENERGETIKE 623 Na Temelju Članka 210
    NN 26/2020 (10.3.2020.), Pravilnik o posebnim uvjetima za obavljanje djelatnosti vodoistražnih radova i drugih hidrogeoloških usluga, poslova preventivne obrane od poplava te poslova i mjera redovite i izvanredne obrane od poplava te održavanja detaljnih građevina za melioracijsku odvodnju i građevina za navodnjavanje MINISTARSTVO ZAŠTITE OKOLIŠA I ENERGETIKE 623 Na temelju članka 210. stavka 2. Zakona o vodama (»Narodne novine«, broj 66/19) ministar zaštite okoliša i energetike, donosi PRAVILNIK O POSEBNIM UVJETIMA ZA OBAVLJANJE DJELATNOSTI VODOISTRAŽNIH RADOVA I DRUGIH HIDROGEOLOŠKIH USLUGA, POSLOVA PREVENTIVNE OBRANE OD POPLAVA TE POSLOVA I MJERA REDOVITE I IZVANREDNE OBRANE OD POPLAVA TE ODRŽAVANJA DETALJNIH GRAĐEVINA ZA MELIORACIJSKU ODVODNJU I GRAĐEVINA ZA NAVODNJAVANJE 1. PREDMET PROPISIVANJA Članak 1. Ovim Pravilnikom propisuju se posebni uvjeti za obavljanje djelatnosti iz članka 209. stavka 1., točaka 1., 2. i 3. Zakona o vodama (»Narodne novine«, broj 66/19; u daljnjem tekstu: Zakon o vodama), a osobito tehnička opremljenost, brojnost i stručnost zaposlenika te branjena područja. 2. POSEBNI UVJETI ZA OBAVLJANJE DJELATNOSTI VODOISTRAŽNIH RADOVA I DRUGIH HIDROGEOLOŠKIH USLUGA Djelatnost vodoistražnih radova i drugih hidrogeoloških usluga Članak 2. Djelatnost iz članka 209. stavka 1., točke 1. Zakona o vodama uključuje: 1. hidrogeološka istraživanja 2. geozička istraživanja i 3. bušenje istražnih bušotina i zdenaca. Zajednički posebni uvjeti za obavljanje djelatnosti vodoistražnih radova i drugih hidrogeoloških usluga, poslova
    [Show full text]
  • Anto Bagić, Dipl. Ing. Geod. (30
    IN MEMORIAM Anto Bagić, dipl. ing. geod. (30. ožujka 1936. - 4. ožujka 2019.) Anto Bagić rođen je 30. ožujka u Donjim Ledenicama, njh, površine 30.992 ha projektirano je i izgrađeno Općina Gradačac, BiH. Osnovnu i srednju školu pohađao je 12 crpnih stanica kapaciteta 60,0 m3/s. Sastavni dio u Gradačcu. Diplomirao je 9. srpnja 1962. na Geodetskom izgradnje melioracijskih sustava površinske odvodnje odjelu Arhitektonsko-građevinsko-geodetskog fakulteta bila je prethodna izrada projektno-izvedbenih rješenja Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. regulacije glavnih vodotoka melioracijskog područja Od 1. rujna 1963. do 31. siječnja 1968. g. obavljao Črnec polje, u cilju zaštite od vanjskih voda, te izgradnju je poslove referenta za melioracije u Poljoprivredno- pripadajućih hidrotehničkih objekata. U skladu s industrijskom kombinatu Županja. Sudjelovao je u radu hidropedološkim obilježjima tla i potrebe uređenja Komisije za komasacije i melioracije općine Županja. vodno-zračnog režima za optimalni razvoj biljnih kultura Od 1. veljače 1968. do 31. listopada 1972. obavljao je projektirani su i izrađeni sustavi i podzemne odvodnje poslove voditelja Odjela za melioracije u Agrokombinatu na 14.470 ha poljoprivtrednih zemljišta. U procesu Zagreb. U sklopu kontrole projekata dogradnje postojećih izrade projektne dokumentacije melioracijskog uređenja i izgradnje novih melioracijskih kanala predlagao je i područja Črnec polja Anto Bagić je dao veliki doprinos izgradnju sustava podzemne odvodnje poljoprivrednih razvoju suradnje sa stručnjacima i znanstvenicima zemljišta na dijelu melioracijskih površina tadašnjih poljoprivredne struke kao i uključivanje mlađih inženjera općina: Kutina, Ivanić Grad, Dugo Selo, Sesvete te grada geodezije i građevinarstva u izradi studija i projektne Zagreba. dokumentacije u području melioracija. Od 1. studenog 1972. g. do 31.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustav Navodnjavanja Orljava-Londža U Požeško-Slavonskoj Županiji
    Sustav navodnjavanja Orljava-Londža u Požeško-slavonskoj županiji STUDIJA ZA GLAVNU OCJENU O PRIHVATLJIVOSTI ZAHVATA ZA EKOLOŠKU MREŽU ZAGREB, lipanj 2014. Studija za Glavnu ocjenu o prihvatljivosti zahvata za Naziv dokumenta ekološku mrežu Sustav navodnjavanja Orljava-Londža u Zahvat Požeško-slavonskoj županiji Požeško-slavonska županija Nositelj zahvata Županijska 7; HR-34000 Požega tel. +385 (0) 32 290 290 Kontakt nositelja zahvata fax:+385 (0) 32 290 200 adresa Jagodno 100a 10410 Velika Gorica tel/fax Izrađivač studije +385 1 2390 253 e-mail [email protected] web www.ires.hr Ovlašteni voditelj stručnih poslova zaštite prirode Izrađivača Dr. sc. Zoran Pišl, dipl. ing. mat. Voditelj stručnog tima za izradu studije Stjepan Dekanić, dipl. ing. šum. Stručni tim izrađivača Robert Španić, dipl. ing. biol. Vedran Šegota, dipl. ing. biol. Nikola Koletić, mag. oecol. et prot. nat. Roberta Skukan, mag.biol.exp., mag.ing.agr. Lorena Derežanin, mag. biol. exp. ZAGREB, lipanj 2014. SADRŽAJ 1. UVOD_____________________________________________________ 1 1.1. Razlozi izrade studije_______________________________________________ 1 1.2. Cilj provedbe glavne ocjene zahvata___________________________________ 5 1.3. Metode predviđanja utjecaja _________________________________________ 6 2. PODACI O ZAHVATU I LOKACIJI ZAHVATA _____________________ 10 2.1. Opis lokacije zahvata______________________________________________ 10 2.2. Izvod iz prostorno-planske dokumentacije______________________________ 21 2.3. Opis zahvata ____________________________________________________ 43 3. PODACI O PODRUČJIMA EKOLOŠKE MREŽE NA KOJA ZAHVAT MOŽE IMATI UTJECAJ____________________________________________ 65 3.1. Opis područja ekološke mreže na koja je moguć utjecaj___________________ 65 3.2. Opis ciljeva očuvanja ekološke mreže_________________________________ 72 3.3. Kartografski prikaz područja ekološke mreže s ucrtanim područjem zahvata ___ 75 4. OPIS UTJECAJA ZAHVATA NA EKOLOŠKU MREŽU ______________ 76 4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment in the Sava River Basin
    PRELIMINARY FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT IN THE SAVA RIVER BASIN July, 2014 Date Document Revision History Document Author/Reviser 23 September 2013 Initial draft – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ PEG FP 17 December 2013 Draft 2 – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ V. Tusić, M. Babić Mladenović 30 January 2014 Draft 2.1 – reviewed at 23rd PEG FP meeting Secretariat/ PEG FP 20 March 2014 Draft 3 – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ V. Tusić, A. Bezdrob 14 April 2014 Draft 3.1 – sent as doc. for 24th PEG FP meeting Secretariat/ PEG FP 02 June 2014 Draft 4 – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ V. Tusić 10 June 2014 Draft 4.1 – sent to PEG FP for approval Secretariat/ PEG FP (no comments) 18 June 2014 Draft 5 – sent to ISRBC Secretariat/ ISRBC 01 July 2014 ISRBC accepted and approved publishing on web ISRBC International Sava River Basin Commission Kneza Branimira 29 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia T: + 385 1 488 69 60 F: + 385 1 488 69 86 [email protected] www.savacommission.org TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE SAVA RIVER BASIN .................................................................. 3 3 OVERALL APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................... 4 3.1 SLOVENIA ...........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 3.2 Industrial Pollution Sources in Sava River Basin
    Sava River Basin Management Plan Background paper No. 3 Significant pressures identified in the Sava River Basin March 2013 This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the beneficiaries and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union. Sava River Basin Management Plan Table of contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 2 Criteria for assessment of point pollution sources ................................ 2 2.1 Agglomerations and Urban Wastewaters Treatment Plants - Criteria of significance, load and efficiency of wastewater treatment ..................................................... 2 2.2 Food industry – Criteria of significance ......................................................................................... 3 2.3 Industrial wastewaters - Direct and indirect discharges ........................................................ 3 2.4 Application of criteria for identification of significant industrial pollution sources .... 6 2.5 Water abstractions ................................................................................................................................. 7 2.6 Pollution sources - data collection ................................................................................................... 8 3 Pressures and measures - data overview by countries ....................... 9
    [Show full text]
  • Javna Vodoopskrba I Crpil1sta U Koprivničko-Križevačkoj Županiji
    Zdravko ŠIMUNIĆ JAVNA VODOOPSKRBA I CRPIL1STA U KOPRIVNIČKO-KRIŽEVAČKOJ ŽUPANIJI (Sukladno hidrogeološkim značajkama, područje Koprivničko-križevačke županije podijeljeno je na četiri vodna područja: Sjeverni dio vodnog područja slivova Lonje, Ilove i Česme; brdovito- brežuljkasti dio sliva Drave; Istočni dio uzvodne (zapadne) Podravine; Vodno područje srednje Podravine. Hidrogeološke značajke županije uvjetovane su geološkom građom, hidrografskom mrežom, morfologijom terena i klimatskim prilikama. Županija se nalazi u sjeverozapadnom dijelu Republike Hrvatske, a u regionalnom smislu nalazi se u sjevernom dijelu središnje Hrvatske. U teritorijalno-političkom smislu županija ima tri gradska područja: Koprivnica, Križevci, Đurđevac te 22 općine: Drnje, Đelekovec, Ferdinandovac, Cola, Gornja Rijeka, Hlebine, Kalinovac, Kalnik, Kloštar Podravski, Koprivnički Bregi, Koprivnički Ivanec, Legrad, Molve, Novigrad Podravski, Novo Virje, Peteranec, Podravske Sesvete, Rasinja, Solokovac, Sveti Ivan Žabno, Sveti Petar Orehovec i Virje. Središte županije je grad Koprivnica. Gledano s fizičko-geografskog položaja, županija je dio rubnog područja Panonske nizine. U okviru panonske megaregije zauzima dio u regiji zavale Sjeverozapadne Hrvatske. Tu zauzima veći dio Lonjsko-ilovske zavale s bilogorskom Podravinom, dok reljefni okvir županije čini gorski masiv Kalnika na zapadu, te samostalno pobrđe Bilogore, koje odvaja nizinu Lonjsko-ilovske zavale na jugu od nizine Drave na sjeveru. Bilogora ima važnu ulogu u sferi vodotoka, jer čini lokalnu razvodnicu
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Bodies in the Sava River Basin
    Sava River Basin Management Plan Background paper No.1 Surface water bodies in the Sava River Basin March 2013 This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the beneficiaries and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union. Sava River Basin Management Plan Table of Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 5 2. Description of the Sava River and its main tributaries ......................... 5 2.1 Sectioning of the River Sava.................................................................................................. 8 3 Delineation of surface water bodies ............................................................ 10 4 Surface water monitoring network in the Sava River Basin ............... 18 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 18 4.2 Assessment of the existing national and Danube basin wide monitoring networks .................................................................................................................................... 19 4.3 Danube Transnational Monitoring Network ...................................................................... 21 4.4 Comparability of monitoring results ....................................................................... 23 4.5 Monitoring
    [Show full text]
  • Matični Brojevi Naselja
    Matični broj Matični broj Redni broj Ime naselja Ime grada/općine Ime žup naselja grada/općine županije Ada 000019 ŠODOLOVCI 06149 14 Osječko-baranjska Adamovec 000027 GRAD ZAGREB 01333 21 Grad Zagreb Adžamovci 000035 REŠETARI 03727 12 Brodsko-posavska Alaginci 000043 POŽEGA 03514 11 Požeško-slavonska Alan 000051 SENJ 03875 09 Ličko-senjska Aleksinica 000086 GOSPIĆ 01309 09 Ličko-senjska Alilovci 000094 KAPTOL 01775 11 Požeško-slavonska Aljmaš 000108 ERDUT 01104 14 Osječko-baranjska Amatovci 000116 BRESTOVAC 00353 11 Požeško-slavonska Andigola 000124 ČAZMA 00639 07 Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Andraševec 000132 OROSLAVJE 03115 02 Krapinsko-zagorska Andrijaševci 000159 ANDRIJAŠEVCI 00019 16 Vukovarsko-srijemska Andrijevac 035041 KOŠKA 02054 14 Osječko-baranjska Andrilovec 000167 DUGO SELO 01015 01 Zagrebačka Antenal 000175 NOVIGRAD - CITTANOVA 02917 18 Istarska Antin 000183 TORDINCI 04588 16 Vukovarsko-srijemska Antolovec 000191 LEGRAD 02275 06 Koprivničko-križevačka Antonci 000213 GROŽNJAN - GRISIGNANA 01384 18 Istarska Antonci 000221 POREČ - PARENZO 03484 18 Istarska Antunovac 000248 ANTUNOVAC 00027 14 Osječko-baranjska Antunovac 000256 LIPIK 02313 11 Požeško-slavonska Antunovac 000078 VELIKA 04758 11 Požeško-slavonska Anžići 000264 VIŠNJAN - VISIGNANO 04979 18 Istarska Apatija 000272 LUDBREG 02445 05 Varaždinska Apatovec 000299 KRIŽEVCI 02143 06 Koprivničko-križevačka Apševci 000302 NIJEMCI 02950 16 Vukovarsko-srijemska Arapovac 000329 SLUNJ 04006 04 Karlovačka Arbanija 000337 TROGIR 04634 17 Splitsko-dalmatinska Aržano 000345 CISTA PROVO 00507 17 Splitsko-dalmatinska Ašikovci 000353 PLETERNICA 03344 11 Požeško-slavonska Auguštanovec 000361 POKUPSKO 05444 01 Zagrebačka Babići 000396 KAŠTELIR-LABINCI - CASTELLIERE-S.
    [Show full text]
  • MINISTARSTVO POLJOPRIVREDE 1280 Na Temelju Članka 50
    NN 65/2019 (5.7.2019.), Pravilnik o načinu revalorizacije zakupnine odnosno naknade za korištenje poljoprivrednog zemljišta u vlasništvu Republike Hrvatske MINISTARSTVO POLJOPRIVREDE 1280 Na temelju članka 50. stavka 6. Zakona o poljoprivrednom zemljištu (»Narodne novine«, broj 20/18 i 115/18) ministar poljoprivrede donosi PRAVILNIK O NAČINU REVALORIZACIJE ZAKUPNINE ODNOSNO NAKNADE ZA KORIŠTENJE POLJOPRIVREDNOG ZEMLJIŠTA U VLASNIŠTVU REPUBLIKE HRVATSKE Članak 1. Ovim Pravilnikom propisuje se način usklađenja zakupnine odnosno naknade za korištenje poljoprivrednog zemljišta u vlasništvu Republike Hrvatske za vrijeme trajanja ugovora (u daljnjem tekstu: revalorizacija). Članak 2. (1) Revalorizacija iz članka 1. ovoga Pravilnika provodi se ako je ugovorena zakupnina odnosno naknada niža ili viša u odnosu na jediničnu revaloriziranu zakupninu odnosno naknadu. (2) Revalorizacija iz članka 1. ovoga Pravilnika provodi se i u slučaju kada je prosječni godišnji indeks potrošačkih cijena (ukupno) jednak ili veći od 103,0 u odnosu na prethodnu godinu i to za indeks tog uvećanja. (3) Revalorizacija iz stavka 1. i 2. ovoga članka ne primjenjuje se na zakup ribnjaka i zakup zajedničkih pašnjaka. Članak 3. (1)Revalorizirana zakupnina odnosno naknada za poljoprivredno zemljište iz članka 2. stavka 1. ovoga Pravilnika izračunava se na temelju formule: RZ = JRZ × p gdje je: RZ – revalorizirana zakupnina odnosno naknada u kunama JRZ – jedinična revalorizirana zakupnina odnosno naknada /ha u kunama p – površina u ha. (2) Jedinična revalorizirana zakupnina odnosno naknada (JRZ) utvrđena je na temelju dvostruke početne zakupnine iz Uredbe o načinu izračuna početne zakupnine poljoprivrednog zemljišta u vlasništvu Republike Hrvatske (»Narodne novine«, br. 89/18) koja je umanjena za 5% . (3) Jedinična revalorizirana zakupnina odnosno naknada (JRZ) za poljoprivredno zemljište prikazana je po županijama, katastarskim općinama i katastarskim kulturama i navedena je u Tablici 1.
    [Show full text]