Department of the House of Representatives Annual Report 2014–15 Part 1 Overviews 3
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2015-16 Annual Report
2015-16 Annual Report About GetUp GetUp is a community of over one million Australians who come together around a shared basic belief in fairness, compassion, and courage. Our work on economic fairness, climate justice and human rights is driven by our values, and our fierce independence from political factions and party politics. GetUp has become one of the most powerful campaigning communities in Australia by giving everyday people the chance to make an extraordinary impact -- online, across the airwaves and in the streets. GetUp’s one million members amplify their impact by contacting their representatives, giving small one-off and recurring donations, and stepping up to lead major campaign efforts. We combine the sheer power of one million members with the ingenuity of expert strategists. Whether it’s raucous protests or partnering with policy experts, we strive for a thriving democracy by constantly holding our politicians to account. 1 2015-16 Annual Report Letter from the National Director In the 2014-15 Annual Report, we pledged to together ‘roll out our most ambitious, online and on-the-ground election effort yet’ and GetUp’s 2016 election effort did not disappoint. GetUp members from all across Australia came together to demonstrate the strength of our people powered movement, striving to create a more fair, flourishing and just Australia on a greater scale than ever before. From handing out how-to-vote cards to phone banking, to chipping in to fund billboards, everyday Australians took on the right wing blockers holding us back - and won. Using the power of people, GetUp achieved: ! An average swing of 4.9% against the hard right in our target seats; ! Eight MPs who were blocking progress on issues we care about lost their place in Parliament; ! Massive swings against other hard right blockers including George Christensen and Peter Dutton; ! Australia-wide conversations from all sides of politics about the big issues, like investing in hospitals, renewable energy and ending corporate tax dodging. -
Unleashing Our Tourism Potential
PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Northern Horizons – Unleashing Our Tourism Potential Report on the Inquiry into Opportunities and Methods for Stimulating the Tourism Industry in Northern Australia Joint Standing Committee on Northern Australia June 2018 CANBERRA © Commonwealth of Australia ISBN 978-1-74366-661-6 (Printed Version) ISBN 978-1-74366-662-3 (HTML Version) This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License. The details of this licence are available on the Creative Commons website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/. Chair's Foreword Northern Australia is home to many iconic locations that attract millions of tourists from across Australia and the world. Uluru in the Northern Territory, the Great Barrier Reef in Queensland, and Broome with its unique pearls in Western Australia are all world-renowned tourism destinations, but only scratch the surface of what Northern Australia’s tourism industry has to offer. In 2014 the Committee’s predecessor, the Joint Select Committee on Northern Australia1, released its report Pivot North: Inquiry into the Development of Northern Australia (Pivot North). Pivot North presented an overarching examination of challenges to, and opportunities for, economic growth and development in Northern Australia. In 2016, the predecessor Committee inquired into opportunities to expand the aquaculture industry. This Committee has now turned its focus to examining ways to stimulate the tourism industry in Northern Australia. The tourism industry presents a major opportunity to support the long term economic and social development of the north and thereby contribute to the sustainability of a large number of remote and regional communities. -
Estimates 11 June 2014
ESTIMATES COMMITTEE PROCEEDINGS – Wednesday 11 June 2014 The Estimates Committee convened at 8.30 am Madam CHAIR: Good morning everyone. Before commencing questions this morning I would like to make a statement about the admissibility of questions and conduct at these hearings. Estimate hearings provide a valuable opportunity for members to question ministers about any matters related to the budget. They are an opportunity to obtain information; however, standing orders do not allow questions to make inferences or imputations about any person, or for members to attribute unbecoming conduct or motives to another member. To assist openness and the free flow of questioning, I have allowed significant latitude in the asking of questions. However, when it comes to making imputations or attributing unbecoming conduct my tolerance has been exhausted. I encourage members to ask questions relating to the budget, and warn members that questions outside the standing orders will not be allowed. For the benefit of Hansard we have Nathan Barrett, member for Blain; Gary Higgins, member for Daly; me, member for Drysdale; the Opposition Leader and member for Karama, Delia Lawrie, the member for Nightcliff, Natasha Fyles; and the member for Nelson, Gerry Wood. I welcome you Chief Minister, and invite you to introduce the officers accompanying you today. CHIEF MINISTER’S PORTFOLIOS AUDITOR-GENERAL’S OFFICE Mr GILES: Thank you very much Madam Chair, and thank you to the PAC. I would like to welcome Frank McGuiness, Auditor-General and ask that any questions be directed to me or Frank in regard to the Auditor- General. Madam CHAIR: Chief Minister, I invite you to make an opening statement of no more than five minutes. -
The House of Representatives Results Ben Raue
7 The House of Representatives Results Ben Raue At the 2016 Australian federal election, the first-term Liberal–National Coalition government faced a significant swing against it, suffering a net loss of 12 seats. The government managed to win a narrow majority, with just 76 out of 150 seats. This chapter covers the results of the election in the House of Representatives, focusing on key electoral contests, as well as explaining the electoral system used for the House of Representatives, redistributions conducted prior to the elections, by-elections held during the previous term, the number of nominations made for the House of Representatives and the impact of preferences on the election result. Electoral system The House of Representatives is the lower house of Australia’s bicameral parliament. Elections are usually held simultaneously with elections for the upper house (Senate), although Senate elections are conducted using a method of proportional representation. House of Representatives elections are due once every three years. Australia’s House of Representatives consists of 150 members, each elected to represent a single-member constituency. Members are elected using compulsory preferential voting, with voters required to effectively choose preferences between every candidate on the ballot. If no candidate wins more than half of the vote, 159 DOUBLE DISILLUSION the vote for the lowest-polling candidate is redistributed according to the preferences of that candidate’s voters, and this process is repeated until a candidate has a majority of the vote. Due to this preferential voting system, this chapter will refer to the vote for candidates before and after preferences are distributed. -
Representation of Women in Australian Parliaments 2014 9 July
RESEARCH PAPER SERIES, 2014–15 9 JULY 2014 Representation of women in Australian parliaments 2014 Dr Joy McCann and Janet Wilson Politics and Public Administration Executive summary • Across Australia women continue to be significantly under-represented in parliament and executive government, comprising less than one-third of all parliamentarians and one-fifth of all ministers. • Internationally, Australia’s ranking for women in national government continues to decline when compared with other countries. • The representation of women in Australia’s parliaments hovers around the ‘critical mass’ of 30 per cent regarded by the United Nations as the minimum level necessary for women to influence decision-making in parliament. • There is no consensus amongst researchers in the field as to why women continue to be under-represented in Australia’s system of parliamentary democracy, although a number of factors contribute to the gender imbalance. This paper includes discussion of some of the structural, social and cultural factors influencing women’s representation including the type of electoral system, the culture of political parties, and the nature of politics and the parliamentary environment in Australia. • This updated paper draws on recent data and research to discuss trends and issues relating to women in Australian parliaments within an international context. It includes data on women in leadership and ministry positions, on committees and as candidates in Commonwealth elections. Whilst the focus is on the Commonwealth Parliament, the paper includes comparative information about women in state and territory parliaments. • The issue of gender diversity is also discussed within the broader context of women in leadership and executive decision-making roles in Australia including local government, government boards and in the corporate sector. -
Morrison's Miracle the 2019 Australian Federal Election
MORRISON'S MIRACLE THE 2019 AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL ELECTION MORRISON'S MIRACLE THE 2019 AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL ELECTION EDITED BY ANIKA GAUJA, MARIAN SAWER AND MARIAN SIMMS In memory of Dr John Beaton FASSA, Executive Director of the Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia from 2001 to 2018 and an avid supporter of this series of election analyses Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] Available to download for free at press.anu.edu.au ISBN (print): 9781760463618 ISBN (online): 9781760463625 WorldCat (print): 1157333181 WorldCat (online): 1157332115 DOI: 10.22459/MM.2020 This title is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The full licence terms are available at creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Cover design and layout by ANU Press Cover photograph: Scott Morrison Campaign Day 11. Photo by Mick Tsikas, AAP. This edition © 2020 ANU Press CONTENTS Figures . ix Plates . xiii Tables . .. xv Abbreviations . xix Acknowledgements . xxiii Contributors . xxv Foreword . xxxiii 1 . Morrison’s miracle: Analysing the 2019 Australian federal election . 1 Anika Gauja, Marian Sawer and Marian Simms Part 1. Campaign and context 2 . Election campaign overview . 21 Marian Simms 3 . The rules of the game . 47 Marian Sawer and Michael Maley 4 . Candidates and pre‑selection . .. 71 Anika Gauja and Marija Taflaga 5 . Ideology and populism . 91 Carol Johnson 6 . The personalisation of the campaign . 107 Paul Strangio and James Walter 7 . National polling and other disasters . 125 Luke Mansillo and Simon Jackman 8 . -
Australasian Parliamentary Review
Australasian Parliamentary Review JOURNAL OF THE AUSTRALASIAN STUDY OF PARLIAMENT GROUP Editor: Rodney Smith, Professor of Australian Politics, University of Sydney Representative Democracy Under Pandemic Aboriginal Voting Power Australian Upper Houses SPRING 2019/AUTUMN 2020 • VOL 34 NO 2 • $A35 2 AUSTRALASIAN STUDY OF PARLIAMENT GROUP (ASPG) AND THE AUSTRALASIAN PARLIAMENTARY REVIEW (APR) The APR is the official journal of ASPG, which was formed in 1978 for the purpose of encouraging and stimulating research, writing and teaching about parliamentary institutions in Australia, New Zealand and the South Pacific (see back page for Notes to Contributors to the journal and details of AGPS membership, which includes a subscription to APR). To know more about the ASPG, including its Executive membership and its Chapters, go to www.aspg.org.au AUSTRALASIAN PARLIAMENTARY REVIEW Editor: Professor Rodney Smith, University of Sydney. Email: [email protected] EDITORIAL BOARD Dr Peter Aimer, University of Auckland Professor Graeme Orr, University of Queensland Jennifer Aldred, Public and Regulatory Policy Dr Harry Phillips, Parliament Consultant of Western Australia Dr Dr David Clune, University of Sydney Stephen Redenbach, Dr Ken Coghill, Monash University Parliament of Victoria Professor Brian Costar, Swinburne University of Dr Paul Reynolds, Parliament Technology of Queensland Dr Jennifer Curtin, University of Auckland Kirsten Robinson, Parliament Dr Gareth Griffith, NSW Parliamentary Library of Western Australia Professor John Halligan, -
Representation of Women in Australian Parliaments
Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services BACKGROUND NOTE 7 March 2012 Representation of women in Australian parliaments Dr Joy McCann and Janet Wilson Politics and Public Administration Section Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 How does Australia rate? ......................................................................................................................... 2 Parliamentarians ................................................................................................................................. 2 Parliamentary leaders and presiding officers ..................................................................................... 3 Ministers and parliamentary secretaries ............................................................................................ 4 Women chairing parliamentary committees ...................................................................................... 6 Women candidates in Commonwealth elections ............................................................................... 7 Historical overview................................................................................................................................. 10 First women in parliament ................................................................................................................ 10 Commonwealth .......................................................................................................................... -
Contents Visitors
DEBATES – Thursday 23 March 2017 CONTENTS VISITORS ................................................................................................................................................. 1347 Moulden Primary School ....................................................................................................................... 1347 Speaker’s statement ................................................................................................................................. 1347 Terror Attacks in London ....................................................................................................................... 1347 LEAVE OF ABSENCE .............................................................................................................................. 1347 Deputy Chief Minister ............................................................................................................................ 1347 MINISTERIAL ARRANGEMENTS ............................................................................................................ 1348 Question Time ....................................................................................................................................... 1348 MINISTERIAL STATEMENT ..................................................................................................................... 1348 Supporting Territory Women ................................................................................................................. 1348 VISITORS ................................................................................................................................................ -
Strategic Political Counsel Pre-Election Brief Prepared June
Strategic Political Counsel Pre-Election Brief Prepared June 30, 2016 Introduction This Brief contains an overview of marginal seats in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, and also provides information about who the current seat is held by, including the incumbent member, the main contestant, and most importantly, the margin by which the seat is currently held. Additionally, this brief includes opinion polls for both the primary and 2PP vote of both upper and lower houses. Executive Summary With the election only a few days away, our research indicates the following; Strategic Political Counsel’s Election Forecast: House of Representatives 1. Labor’s primary vote has dipped across the country, but they are still favoured to pick up a number of marginal seats. 2. The Coalition will win a workable majority of 82-83 seats in the House of Representatives. 3. Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce will retain New England. 4. The Nationals are a strong chance to win the seat of Murray. 5. Luke Hartsuyker will retain Cowper. 6. Natasha Griggs will not retain Solomon. 7. Jamie Briggs will lose Mayo to Nick Xenophon Team candidate Rebekha Sharkie. 8. Christopher Pyne will retain Sturt, defeating the Nick Xenophon Team candidate by a comfortable margin. 9. Cathy McGowan will retain Indi. Senate 1. The Coalition will win 31-32 Senate seats. 2. The Nick Xenophon Team will win between 25% - 30% of the senate vote in South Australia and win 4 Senate seats, with the possibility of a 5th in Western Australia or Victoria. 3. Jacquie Lambie will be re-elected. -
Electoral Administration and Aboriginal Voting Power In
Electoral Administration and Aboriginal Voting Power in the Northern Territory: Reality and Potential Viewed from the 2019 Federal Election* Will Sanders1 Senior Fellow, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University * Double-blind reviewed article. Abstract Due to population proportion, Aboriginal people have the potential to exercise electoral power in Australia’s Northern Territory. Looking back from 2019, this paper explores the contribution of Aboriginal votes to federal elections in the Northern Territory. It argues that Aboriginal votes have made the Territory stronger for Labor, compared to regional areas of Queensland and Western Australia. It also notes low enrolment and turnout figures in House of Representatives divisions with high proportions of Aboriginal population, which suggests potential Aboriginal electoral power that is as-yet unused. Turnout and enrolment figures are related to developments in electoral administration since 1983, when enrolment was first made compulsory for Aboriginal Australians over 18, as for others. Whether compulsory enrolment and voting has yet been achieved by electoral administration in remote areas is discussed, as is the 1 Acknowledgements: Marian Simms and Marian Sawer encouraged me to contribute a 2000-word essay on the Northern Territory to a June 2019 Academy of Social Sciences Australia workshop of political scientists examining the 2019 federal election. From that little essay has grown a much larger one, covering issues of electoral administration in remote areas as well as Aboriginal voting. Thank you Marians for the encouragement to delve again into this important field. My other great debt is to officers of the Australian Electoral Commission who shared their knowledge with an academic who just phoned up and started asking them about some of the details of their administrative practice. -
Disorderly Conduct in the House of Representatives from 1901 to 2016
RESEARCH PAPER SERIES, 2016–17 22 DECEMBER 2016 ‘That's it, you’re out’: disorderly conduct in the House of Representatives from 1901 to 2016 Rob Lundie Politics and Public Administration Executive summary • Of the 1,136 members who have served in the House of Representatives from 1901 to the end of the 44th Parliament in May 2016, 329 (30 per cent) have been penalised for disorderly behaviour in the Chamber. This study outlines the bases of the House’s authority to deal with disorderly behaviour, and the procedures available to the Speaker to act on such behaviour. It then analyses the 1,876 instances of disorderly behaviour identified in the official Hansard record with a view to identifying patterns over time, and the extent and degree of such behaviour. • The authority for the rules of conduct in the House of Representatives is derived from the Australian Constitution. Members themselves have broad responsibility for their behaviour in the House. However, it is the role of the Speaker, or the occupier of the Chair, to ensure that order is maintained during parliamentary proceedings. This responsibility is derived from the Standing Orders. • Since its introduction in 1994, the ‘sin bin’ has become the disciplinary action of choice for speakers, while the number of namings and suspensions has decreased. The sin bin appears to have been successful in avoiding the disruption caused by the naming and suspension procedure. However, as the number of sin bin sanctions has increased, it may be that this penalty has contributed to greater disorder because members may view it as little more than a slap on the wrist and of little deterrent value.