A Bibliography of Technology and the African-American Experience
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Guide to the Society for the History of Technology Records
Guide to the Society for the History of Technology Records NMAH.AC.0400 Robert Harding and Alison Oswald 1999 Archives Center, National Museum of American History P.O. Box 37012 Suite 1100, MRC 601 Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 [email protected] http://americanhistory.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 3 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 8 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 4 Bibliography.................................................................................................................... 10 Names and Subjects .................................................................................................... 10 Container Listing ........................................................................................................... 11 Subgroup I: General Records, 1956 - 2017........................................................... 11 Subgroup II: Technology and Culture Records, 1958 - 2012............................... 136 Society for the History of Technology Records -
Creole Technologies and Global Histories: Rethinking How Things Travel in Space and Time
Creole technologies and global histories: rethinking how things travel in space and time By David Edgerton* The Uruguayan writer Eduardo Galeano once wrote: ‘la diosa tecnología no habla español’ [the Goddess Techno- logy does not speak Spanish].1 Indeed historians of techno- logy in many parts of the world are told the equivalent. Most of us, it is claimed, don’t speak technology; don’t have technology to speak of.2 As I have argued elsewhere, in order to be able to write a history of technology which is both global and historical, and which engages directly with more * Imperial College London. I am most grateful to participants at the Lisbon workshop on “The Circulation of Science and Technology: Places Travels and Landscapes” for their comments, as well as to Waqar Zaidi, anonymous referees, Tiago Saraiva, and especially to Eric Schatzberg. 1 Eduardo Galeano, Las Venas abiertas de America Latina (Buenos Aires/México, D. F.: Siglo XXI, 1978), first published 1971, p. 381. 2 This point has been made to me by many colleagues from around the world, and also by an American historian of technology, Pauline Kusiak, who noted that in Senegal, the Senegalese were astonished to find her studying ‘technology’ in their country. HoST, 2007, 1: 75-112 HoST , Vol.1, Summer 2007 than a tiny minority of white males, we need to break the unfortunate association, indeed conflation, that exists between invention and innovation on the one hand, and technology on the other. 3 In this paper, which draws on a chapter in a forthcoming book, I focus on twentieth-century horse transport in the rich world, and explore the new technologies of the poor world, and especially of its megacities.4 By looking at these cases I show the continued vitality of what is taken to be a technology of previous centuries, and demonstrate how its twentieth growth and survival cannot be understood as persistence. -
A Complete Bibliography of Publications in Isis, 1970–1979
A Complete Bibliography of Publications in Isis, 1970{1979 Nelson H. F. Beebe University of Utah Department of Mathematics, 110 LCB 155 S 1400 E RM 233 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0090 USA Tel: +1 801 581 5254 FAX: +1 801 581 4148 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] (Internet) WWW URL: http://www.math.utah.edu/~beebe/ 26 February 2019 Version 0.14 Title word cross-reference ⊃ [521]. 1 [511]. 1050 [362]. 10th [521]. 11th [1186, 521]. 125th [737]. 1350 [1250]. 1485 [566]. 14th [1409]. 1524 [1554]. 1528 [1484]. 1537 [660]. 1561 [794]. 15th [245]. 1600 [983, 1526, 261]. 1617 [528]. 1632 [805]. 1643 [1058]. 1645 [1776]. 1650 [864]. 1660 [1361]. 1671 [372]. 1672 [1654]. 1674 [1654]. 1675 [88]. 1680 [889]. 1687 [1147]. 1691 [1148]. 1692 [888, 371]. 1695 [296]. 16th [1823]. 1700 [864]. 1700-talets [890]. 1704 [476]. 1708 [265]. 1713 [1415]. 1733 [756]. 1741 [1494]. 1751 [1197]. 1760 [1258]. 1774 [1558]. 1777 [1909, 572]. 1780 [314, 663]. 1792 [269]. 1794 [266]. 1796 [1195, 840]. 1799 [128]. 1799/1804 [128]. 17th [1256, 623, 1813]. 1800 [1641, 100, 1343, 1044, 1655, 248, 1331]. 1802 [127, 437]. 1803 [405, 1778]. 1804 [128]. 1807 [625]. 1814 [668]. 1815 [1777]. 1820 [1660]. 1826 [1857]. 1832 [668]. 1841 [1362]. 1844 [1913, 946]. 1848 [1708]. 185 [1327]. 1850 [1230, 1391]. 1855 [442]. 1860 [301, 1232, 1917, 1367]. 1865 [445, 1263]. 1 2 1866 [253, 71]. 1868 [1019]. 1870's [674]. 1875 [1364]. 1878 [25]. 1880 [1427, 807, 1894]. 1882 [381]. 1889 [1428]. 1893 [1588]. 1894 [1921]. 1895 [896]. -
Host Vol1 David Edgerton
King’s Research Portal Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Edgerton, D. E. H. (2007). Creole technologies and global histories: rethinking how things travel in space and time. History of Science and Technology Journal, 1(1), 75-112. Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. -
AWARDS ANNUAL MEETING Milano 24-27 October
2019 SOCIETY FOR THE HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY AWARDS ANNUAL MEETING milano 24-27 october www.historyoftechnology.org In 2020 the SHOT Annual Meeting takes place in New Orleans, Louisiana (USA), 7-11 October. CONTENTS Society for the History of Technology. 2 2019 Prize Committees .................................................... 3 2019 Awards and Fellowships ............................................... 9 Awards, Grants and Fellowships Special Interest Groups .......................... 22 Previous winners .......................................................... 25 SOCIETY FOR THE HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY President Tom Misa University of Minnesota Vice President Arwen Mohun University of Delaware Secretary Jan Korsten Foundation for the History of Technology Treasurer Amy Bix Iowa State University Editor-in-Chief Suzanne Moon University of Oklahoma 2 SHOT Awards 2019 2019 PRIZE COMMITTEES Leonardo da Vinci Medal The highest recognition from the Society for the History of Technology is the Leonardo da Vinci Medal, presented to an individual who has made an outstanding contribution to the history of technology, through research, teaching, publication, and other activities. Andras Beck (formerly of the Hungarian Academy of Arts) designed the medal, the face of which shows Leonardo’s head modeled after the artist’s self-portrait. The reverse design shows (in the words of the sculptor) “the basic sources of energy: water, wind, and fire.” A certificate accompanies the medal. John Krige (Chair), Georgia Institute of Technology Jennifer Alexander, -
03/Post/Final Pass
“A Very Special Relationship” SHOT and the Smithsonian’s Museum of History and Technology ROBERT C. POST Synergism: Cooperative action of discrete agencies . such that the total effect is greater than the sum of the two or more effects taken independently. —Webster’s Third New International Dictionary Friday, 23 May 1958, a fair spring day in Cleveland. The Plain Dealer head- lined the accidental explosion of eight Nike missiles at Middletown, New Jersey, with a death toll of seven or more. Editorially it lamented “Soviet Russia’s present leadership in the field of rocketry,”and a news item quoted a man identified as “America’s chief tracer of unidentified flying objects” on the danger of withholding UFO information from the public: “Russia might claim flying saucers as a propaganda ‘secret weapon’ at any time.” There was a story on the impending demise of the three-cent stamp, and Dr. Post held various jobs at the National Museum of History and Technology/Museum of American History from 1971 to 1996. From 1974 to 1978 he was special assistant to Brooke Hindle, to whose memory he dedicates this article with gratitude for friendship and support, and, not least, for the title. Post writes: “For help with my research, thanks to Bruce Kirby and LaNina Clayton at the Smithsonian Institution Archives and Rob Harding and John Fleckner at the Archives Center, National Museum of American History, intrepid guardians of the SHOT legacy. Thanks also for guidance, support, or criticism to Ron Becker, Silvio Bedini, Barney Finn, Robert Friedel, Morrell and Barbara Heald, Ben Lawless, Miriam Levin, Art Molella, Bob Multhauf, Alex Roland, Joe Schultz, Bruce Seely, John Staudenmaier, Carlene Stephens, Jeffrey Stine, Eugene Uyeki, Robert Vogel, Jack White, Rosalind Williams, and especially to Dian Post. -
A Bibliography of Publications in Centaurus: an International Journal of the History of Science and Its Cultural Aspects
A Bibliography of Publications in Centaurus: An International Journal of the History of Science and its Cultural Aspects Nelson H. F. Beebe University of Utah Department of Mathematics, 110 LCB 155 S 1400 E RM 233 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0090 USA Tel: +1 801 581 5254 FAX: +1 801 581 4148 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] (Internet) WWW URL: http://www.math.utah.edu/~beebe/ 06 March 2021 Version 1.20 Title word cross-reference 22◦ [588]. 2: n [566]. $49.95 [1574]. $85.00 [1577]. c [850, 1027, 558]. th v [1087]. [876]. 2 [239, 1322]. 4 [239]. ∆IAITA [164]. κφανη& [1031]. ΓEPONTΩN [164]. [517, 86, 112, 113, 741, 281, 411, 335]. [517, 86,p 112, 113, 741, 281, 411, 335]. Φ [734, 801, 735]. π [703]. 0 [1215]. S [673]. 2 [1025]. -derived [1558]. -Matrix [673]. 0 [1542, 1576, 1603, 1578]. 0-8229-4547-9 [1578]. 0-8229-4556-8 [1603]. 1 [1545, 1262, 1173, 1579, 1605]. 1/2 [580]. 10 [1408]. 11 [335]. 12th [107]. 13th [52]. 14th [1002, 1006]. 14th-Century [1002]. 1550 [157]. 1599 [1008]. 1 2 15th [395, 32, 167]. 1650 [1039]. 1669 [636]. 1670 [1335]. 1670-1760 [1335]. 1685 [1013]. 16th [1478, 1477, 1011, 32, 421, 563, 148, 84, 826, 1054, 339, 200, 555]. 16th-century [1477]. 1700 [1279]. 1715 [1581]. 1760 [1335]. 1764 [1277]. 1777 [55]. 1786 [182]. 17th [1478, 1570, 1571]. 17th-century [1570, 1571]. 18 [916]. 1800 [1585]. 1810 [1337]. 1820s [1055]. 1822 [438]. 1822-1972 [438]. 1830s [1362]. 1840 [1600]. -
How to Think About Science and Technology: an Introduction to Science and Technology Studies
How to think about science and technology: An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies Roger Turner STS Program Science and technology shape the way we interact with our environment and imagine our bodies. STS is an interdisciplinary field that considers how science and technology work in society. To understand science, we’ll explore questions like: How do scientists establish their credibility? How is scientific knowledge affected by gender? Are there scientific revolutions? Thinking about technology, we’ll discuss: Does technology determine the future? How do people actually use technologies? Is “technology” more than just machines? In this freshman seminar, we’ll read scholars from history, sociology, anthropology and philosophy as they consider how to understand science. The course provides a solid theoretical foundation for future studies in STS, introducing some of its most influential arguments. Assignments Each week you will write a 2-page paper comparing readings A and B listed on the syllabus. Your goal is to show that you understand the readings by describing an important similarity or difference between the two pieces. At the end of term, you will write a final paper (~10 pages) that takes a current event or controversy related to science and/or technology, and analyze that event in light of the theoretical articles we’ve been reading. Start reading newspapers now, if you don’t already. Supplementary Podcast The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation has produced a marvelous series of interviews with the authors of some of our texts. I encourage you to listen to these podcasts as a supplement to our discussions. They can be downloaded for free through the iTunes store by searching for “How to Think about Science.” Texts • The Science Studies Reader, Mario Biagioli, ed. -
Martha Trescott Prize Ruth Schwartz Cowan (Chair), University of Pennsylvania Janet Abbate, Virginia Tech Adelheid Voskuhl, University of Pennsylvania
AWARDS AND FELLOWSHIPS 2020 SHOT 2020 VIRTUAL FORUM – 8-10 OCTOBER 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS - Award and Fellowship Committees - 3 - 2020 SHOT Awards and Fellowships - 5 SHOT Awards and Fellowships 2020 – page 1 – revised version 11 October 2020 2020 AWARD AND FELLOWSHIP COMMITTEES Leonardo da Vinci Medal John Krige (Chair), Georgia Institute of Technology Robert Bud, Science Museum London Angelina Callahan, Naval Research Laboratory Edward Jones Imhotep, University of Toronto Monique Laney, Auburn University Mar Hicks, Illinois Institute of Technology Sabine Höhler, KTH Royal Institute of Technology Paul Israel, Rutgers University Patrick McCray, University of California – Santa Barbara Maria Portuondo, Johns Hopkins University Ruth Schwartz Cowan, University of Pennsylvania Erik Rau, Hagley Museum and Library Kranzberg Dissertation Fellowship Sabine Höhler (Chair), KTH Royal Institute of Technology Babak Ashrafi, Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine Glenn Bugos, Moment LLC Joy Rohde, University of Michigan Brooke Hindle Postdoctoral Fellowship Monique Laney (Chair), Auburn University Hyungsub Choi, Seoul National University Eric Schatzberg, Georgia Institute of Technology AHA NASA Fellowships Angelina Callahan, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory – committee member on behalf of SHOT SHOT Awards and Fellowships 2020 – page 2 – revised version 11 October 2020 Bernard S. Finn IEEE History Prize (formerly IEEE Life Members’ Prize in Electrical History) Paul Israel (Chair), Rutgers University Paul Ceruzzi, Smithsonian, National -
Cultural History of the Science and Technology of Human Enhancement
ORBIT-OnlineRepository ofBirkbeckInstitutionalTheses Enabling Open Access to Birkbeck’s Research Degree output Engineering humans : cultural history of the science and technology of human enhancement https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/40210/ Version: Full Version Citation: Haug, Knut Hallvard Sverre (2016) Engineering humans : cul- tural history of the science and technology of human enhancement. [Thesis] (Unpublished) c 2020 The Author(s) All material available through ORBIT is protected by intellectual property law, including copy- right law. Any use made of the contents should comply with the relevant law. Deposit Guide Contact: email 1 Engineering Humans a cultural history of the science and technology of human enhancement Knut Hallvard Sverre Haug Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of English and Humanities School of Arts Birkbeck, University of London 2015 2 I declare that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Hallvard Haug 3 Abstract This thesis investigates the technological imaginary of human enhancement: how it has been conceived historically and the scientific understanding that has shaped it. Human enhancement technologies have been prominent in popular culture narratives for a long time, but in the past twenty years they have moved out of science fiction to being an issue for serious discussion, in academic disciplines, political debate and the mass media.. Even so, the bioethical debate on enhancement, whether it is pharmacological means of improving cognition and morality or genetic engineering to create smarter people or other possibilities, is consistently centred on technologies that do not yet exist. The investigation is divided into three main areas: a chapter on eugenics, two chapters on cybernetics and the cyborg, and two chapters on transhumanism. -
The Haraway Reader
The Haraway Reader Donna Haraway ROUTLEDGE NEW YORK AND WNDON Published in 2004 by Routledge 29 West 35th Street New York, NY 10001 www.routledge-ny.com Published in Great Britain by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane London EC4P 4EE www.routledge.co.uk Copyright© 2004 by Taylor & Francis Books, Inc. Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group. Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system without permission in writing from the publisher. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Haraway, Donna Jeanne. The Haraway reader I Donna Haraway. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-415-96688-4 (HB: alk. paper)-ISBN 0-415-96689-2 (PB.: alk. paper) I. Feminist theory. 2. Feminist criticism. 3. Technology-Social aspects. 4. Science-Social aspects. I. Title. HQ 1190 .H364 2003 305.42'01-dc21 2003005861 To all my companion species CONTENTS Introduction: A Kinship of Feminist Figurations 1 A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s 7 2 Ecce Homo, Ain't (Ar'n't) I a Woman, and Inappropriate/cl Others: The Human in a Post-Humanist Landscape 47 3 The Promises of Monsters: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/cl Others 63 4 Otherworldly Conversations; Terran Topics; Local Terms 125 5 Teddy Bear Patriarchy: Taxidermy in the Garden of Eden, New York City, 1908-1936 151 6 Morphing in the Order: Flexible Strategies, Feminist Science Studies, and Primate Revisions 199 7 ModesLWitness@Second_Millennium 223 8 Race: Universal Donors in a Vampire Culture. -
Good Fortune, Mirrors, and Kisses
08_bijker 600– 618:03_49.3dobraszczyk 568– 8/18/13 4:17 PM Page 600 DAVINCIMEDALADDRESS Good Fortune, Mirrors, and Kisses WIEBEE.BIJKER I am very honored by receiving SHOT’s Leonardo da Vinci Medal. It was also a bewildering experience to listen to Arne Kaijser, immediate past pres- ident of SHOT and chair of the da Vinci Committee, reading the citation: Is this about me?1 I shall try to answer this question by taking up the invi- tation by Bernard Carlson, SHOT’s secretary, to use this da Vinci lecture to provide “a mix of major ideas as well as autobiographical reflections.” So, I will look into the mirror; but as a dyed-in-the-wool social constructivist, I will especially describe what then appears as the context in which I have been working. How has the history of technology during the past three dec- ades shaped me? The bottom line of my story is that I have been extremely fortunate. I have been fortunate to meet Thomas Hughes and I have been fortunate to meet Trevor Pinch. How different they are: Trevor is the Irish-British “rock star of the STS community,” while Tom is the southern gentleman; Trevor always emphasizes that “a good presentation makes one and only one point,” while Tom sees wider around and farther beyond than I could ever imagine.2 But they are similar too: both pushed to include a reference to pink champagne in our joint introduction to the SCOTS volume.3 For me, Trevor and Tom epitomize the sociology and history of technology.