Final Project Completion Report 2012-2015
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Pro-Poor Tourism Case Study from Humla District, West
48 6. Appendices 6.1 Data on tourist numbers in Humla Table A1 Number of trekking permits issued16 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 28 209 191 462 404 558 949 595 Table A2 Nationality of tourists registering at Simikot Police Station 1996-2000 (top ten nationalities account for 97% of visitors ) % of total tourists SN Country over 4 years 1 Germany 27.13 2 Australia/Austria 13.65 3 Switzerland 11.61 4 USA 11.45 5 France 9.36 6 UK 7.76 7 Italy 5.12 8 Spain 2.64 9 Netherlands 2.20 10 Japan 1.65 16 Source: Paudyal & Sharma 2000 49 6.2 Background information on SNV’s programmes in Humla preceding the DPP sustainable tourism programme 1985-1992 A Trail and Bridge Building Project was run to improve infrastructure in the Karnali Zone because this was seen to be a pre-requisite for developing the area generally. The project completed a total of 21 bridges, 2 trails and 10 drinking water schemes covering several Karnali Zone districts. In Humla, work on trails, 7 bridges, and several drinking water projects were completed. On the Simikot - Hilsa trail a suspension bridge crossing the Karnali River at Yalbang and a section of trail called ‘Salli-Salla’ were constructed. 1993 – September 1999 The Karnali Local Development Programme was run to further develop infrastructural improvements and to integrate these with social development by building capacity at community and local NGO levels. The district level activities included • District Development Committee (DDC) (i.e. local government) capacity building in participatory planning; • Improvement of intra-district infrastructure; and • Support of NGOs committed to work in the Karnali Zone. -
Feasibility Study of Kailash Sacred Landscape
Kailash Sacred Landscape Conservation Initiative Feasability Assessment Report - Nepal Central Department of Botany Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Nepal June 2010 Contributors, Advisors, Consultants Core group contributors • Chaudhary, Ram P., Professor, Central Department of Botany, Tribhuvan University; National Coordinator, KSLCI-Nepal • Shrestha, Krishna K., Head, Central Department of Botany • Jha, Pramod K., Professor, Central Department of Botany • Bhatta, Kuber P., Consultant, Kailash Sacred Landscape Project, Nepal Contributors • Acharya, M., Department of Forest, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation (MFSC) • Bajracharya, B., International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) • Basnet, G., Independent Consultant, Environmental Anthropologist • Basnet, T., Tribhuvan University • Belbase, N., Legal expert • Bhatta, S., Department of National Park and Wildlife Conservation • Bhusal, Y. R. Secretary, Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Das, A. N., Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Ghimire, S. K., Tribhuvan University • Joshi, S. P., Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Khanal, S., Independent Contributor • Maharjan, R., Department of Forest • Paudel, K. C., Department of Plant Resources • Rajbhandari, K.R., Expert, Plant Biodiversity • Rimal, S., Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Sah, R.N., Department of Forest • Sharma, K., Department of Hydrology • Shrestha, S. M., Department of Forest • Siwakoti, M., Tribhuvan University • Upadhyaya, M.P., National Agricultural Research Council -
Wild Yak Bos Mutus in Nepal: Rediscovery of a Flagship Species
Mammalia 2015; aop Raju Acharya, Yadav Ghimirey*, Geraldine Werhahn, Naresh Kusi, Bidhan Adhikary and Binod Kunwar Wild yak Bos mutus in Nepal: rediscovery of a flagship species DOI 10.1515/mammalia-2015-0066 2009). It has also been believed to inhabit the lower eleva- Received April 15, 2015; accepted July 21, 2015 tion Altai ranges in Mongolia (Olsen 1990). The possible fossil of wild yak discovered in Nepal (Olsen 1990) provided historical evidence of the species’ Abstract: Wild yak Bos mutus is believed to have gone presence in the country. Schaller and Liu (1996) also extinct from Nepal. Various searches in the last decade stated the occurrence of the wild yak in Nepal. Wild failed to document its presence. In Humla district, far- yak is said to inhabit the areas north of the Himalayas western Nepal, we used observation from transects and (Jerdon 1874, Hinton and Fry 1923), which also include vantage points, sign survey on trails, and informal dis- Limi Valley. Skins and horns were sporadically discov- cussions to ascertain the presence of wild yak in 2013 ered by explorers in the Himalayan and trans-Himala- (May–June) and 2014 (June–July). Direct sightings of two yan region of the country. These include evidence of individuals and hoof marks, dung piles, pelts, and head three horns of the species (around four decades old) of an individual killed in 2012 confirmed its presence. that can still be found in Lo Manthang (two pairs of The wild yak has an uncertain national status with con- horn) and Tsaile (one pair of horns) of Upper Mustang firmed records only from Humla district. -
Biodiversity in Karnali Province: Current Status and Conservation
Biodiversity in Karnali Province: Current Status and Conservation Karnali Province Government Ministry of Industry, Tourism, Forest and Environment Surkhet, Nepal Biodiversity in Karnali Province: Current Status and Conservation Karnali Province Government Ministry of Industry, Tourism, Forest and Environment Surkhet, Nepal Copyright: © 2020 Ministry of Industry, Tourism, Forest and Environment, Karnali Province Government, Surkhet, Nepal The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of Ministry of Tourism, Forest and Environment, Karnali Province Government, Surkhet, Nepal Editors: Krishna Prasad Acharya, PhD and Prakash K. Paudel, PhD Technical Team: Achyut Tiwari, PhD, Jiban Poudel, PhD, Kiran Thapa Magar, Yogendra Poudel, Sher Bahadur Shrestha, Rajendra Basukala, Sher Bahadur Rokaya, Himalaya Saud, Niraj Shrestha, Tejendra Rawal Production Editors: Prakash Basnet and Anju Chaudhary Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Acharya, K. P., Paudel, P. K. (2020). Biodiversity in Karnali Province: Current Status and Conservation. Ministry of Industry, Tourism, Forest and Environment, Karnali Province Government, Surkhet, Nepal Cover photograph: Tibetan wild ass in Limi valley © Tashi R. Ghale Keywords: biodiversity, conservation, Karnali province, people-wildlife nexus, biodiversity profile Editors’ Note Gyau Khola Valley, Upper Humla © Geraldine Werhahn This book “Biodiversity in Karnali Province: Current Status and Conservation”, is prepared to consolidate existing knowledge about the state of biodiversity in Karnali province. The book presents interrelated dynamics of society, physical environment, flora and fauna that have implications for biodiversity conservation. -
Karnali Province Tourism Master Plan 2076/77 - 2085/86 BS (2020/21-2029/30)
Karnali Province Ministry of Industry, Tourism, Forest and Environment Surkhet, Nepal Karnali Province Tourism Master Plan 2076/77 - 2085/86 BS (2020/21-2029/30) January 2020 i Karnali Province Ministry of Industry, Tourism, Forest and Environment (MoITFE) Surkhet, Nepal, 2020 KARNALI PROVINCE TOURISM MASTER PLAN 2076/77 - 2085/086 BS (2020/21-2029/30) Technical Assistance WWF Nepal, Kathmandu Office, Nepal Consulting Services Mountain Heritage, Kathmandu, Nepal Advisors Hon. Nanda Singh Budha : Minister; Ministry of Industry, Tourism, Forest and Environment/Karnali Province Dr. Krishna Prasad Acharya : Secretary; Ministry of Industry, Tourism, Forest and Environment/Karnali Province Mr. Dhirendra Pradhan : Ex- Secretary; Ministry of Industry, Tourism, Forest and Environment/Karnali Province Dr. Ghana Shyam Gurung : Country Representative, WWF Nepal Mr. Santosh Mani Nepal : Senior Director, WWF Nepal Focal Persons Ms. Anju Chaudhary : MoITFE/Karnali Province Mr. Eak Raj Sigdel : WWF Nepal Planning Expert Team Members Ms. Lisa Choegyel : Senior Tourism Marketing Advisor Mr. Ram Chandra Sedai : Team Leader/Tourism Expert Dr. Roshan Sherchan : Biodiversity Expert Mr. Jailab K. Rai : Socio-Economist and Gender Specialist Er. Krishna Gautam : Environmental Engineer Mr. Harihar Neupane : Institutional and Governance Expert Mr. Yuba Raj Lama : Culture Expert Cover Photo Credit Ram C.Sedai (All, except mentioned as other's), Bharat Bandhu Thapa (Halji Gomba & Ribo Bumpa Gomba), Chhewang N. Lama (Saipal Base Camp), Dr. Deependra Rokaya (Kailash View Dwar), www.welcometorukum.org (Kham Magar), Google Search (Snow Leopard, Musk Deer, Patal Waterfall, Red Panda). ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Consultant Team would like to acknowledge following institutions and individuals for their meaningful contribution towards the formulation of Karnali Province Tourism Development Master Plan. -
SNV in Humla District, West Nepal
PPT Working Paper No. 3 Practical strategies for pro-poor tourism: case study of pro-poor tourism and SNV in Humla District, West Nepal Naomi M. Saville April 2001 Preface This case study was written as a contribution to a project on ‘pro-poor tourism strategies.’ The pro-poor tourism project is collaborative research involving the Overseas Development Institute (ODI), the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), the Centre for Responsible Tourism at the University of Greenwich (CRT), together with in-country case study collaborators. It is funded by the Economic and Social Research Unit (ESCOR) of the UK Department for International Development (DFID). The project reviewed the experience of pro-poor tourism strategies based on six commissioned case studies. These studies used a common methodology developed within this project. The case study work was undertaken mainly between September and December 2000. Findings have been synthesised into a research report and a policy briefing, while the 6 case studies are all available as Working Papers. The outputs of the project are: Pro-poor tourism strategies: Making tourism work for the poor. Pro-poor Tourism Report No 1. (60pp) by Caroline Ashley, Dilys Roe and Harold Goodwin, April 2001. Pro-poor tourism: Expanding opportunities for the poor. PPT Policy Briefing No 1. (4pp). By Caroline Ashley, Harold Goodwin and Dilys Roe, April 2001. Pro poor Tourism Working Papers: No 1 Practical strategies for pro-poor tourism, Wilderness Safaris South Africa: Rocktail Bay and Ndumu Lodge. Clive Poultney and Anna Spenceley No 2 Practical strategies for pro-poor tourism. Case studies of Makuleke and Manyeleti tourism initiatives: South Africa. -
A Sociolinguistic Survey of Humla Tibetan in Northwest Nepal
DigitalResources Electronic Survey Report 2020-013 A Sociolinguistic Survey of Humla Tibetan in Northwest Nepal Klaas de Vries A Sociolinguistic Survey of Humla Tibetan in Northwest Nepal Klaas de Vries SIL International® 2020 SIL Electronic Survey Report 2020-013, Month 2020 © 2020 SIL International® All rights reserved Data and materials collected by researchers in an era before documentation of permission was standardized may be included in this publication. SIL makes diligent efforts to identify and acknowledge sources and to obtain appropriate permissions wherever possible, acting in good faith and on the best information available at the time of publication. Abstract The Humla Tibetan language [hut], spoken in the far northwest of Nepal, has received little scholarly attention. This report presents the results of sociolinguistic research conducted among the Tibetan- speaking communities in Humla District. The main goal of this research is to describe the primary dialect areas and investigate the relationships between them. Other goals are investigation of the ethnolinguistic identity, assessment of language vitality, and understanding of the desires for development of the communities. In 2012 and 2013, three fieldwork trips were undertaken for data collection. During these trips seven sociolinguistic tools were used. These were wordlists, informal interviews, knowledgeable insider questionnaires, Recorded Story Questions, observation schedule, and two participatory method tools, namely Dialect Mapping and Appreciative Inquiry. This research found that the different speech varieties among the Tibetan-speaking villages of Humla District should be seen as dialects of the same language. Four dialects are identified, namely: the Limi dialect (Til, Halji, and Jang), the Upper Humla dialect (from Yari to Yalbang), the Lower Humla dialect (from Kermi to Kholsi to Tanggin), and the Eastern Humla dialect (from Burangse to Dojam). -
Beekeeping in Humla District West Nepal
Beekeeping in Humla district West Nepal: a field study Commissioned by the District Partner Programme (DPP) - SNV Nepal With extra results from a study commissioned by ApTibeT Conducted and written by Naomi M. Saville and Narayan Prasad Acharya Final Draft submitted 15 May 2001 1 Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the District Partner Programme (DPP) of SNV for commissioning and funding this study and Appropriate Technology for Tibetans (ApTibeT) for allowing us to share our findings from the study commissioned by them. Thanks to all the field staff of DPP in Humla who welcomed us and made us so much at home in their guesthouse. An especial 'thank you' to Tschering Dorje who guided us, carried our pack and helped us in every way in the field. We could not have hoped for a more cooperative and easy assistant. Thanks to staff of the Village Development Programme (VDP), especially Phunjok Lama and Ram Chandra Jaisi, who assisted us in the field. A very big 'thank you' to the staff of Humla Conservation and Development Association (HCDA) for their excellent management and exceedingly warm welcome in the field. Thanks especially to HCDA field motivators Sunita Budha, Hira Rokaya, Dharma Bahadur Shahi and Prayag Bahadur Shahi for their enthusiastic assistance in working with Melchham communities and in making us welcome and comfortable. Thanks to HCDA runner Kara Siraha for assistance and Sunam Budha and Gorkha Budha for accompanying and guiding us over Margole Lekh. Thanks also to Sonam Lama of Bargaun for guide-porter assistance and Khadka Chatyel who guided us over Muniya Lekh in April 2000 during the ApTibeT study. -
For Namkha Rural Municipality, Nepal
PROCEEDINGS Consultative workshop on tourism planning (2020–2024) for Namkha Rural Municipality, Nepal 6 May 2019, Kathmandu, Nepal Copyright © 2019 International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial, No Derivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Published by International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development Note GPO Box 3226, Kathmandu, Nepal This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or nonprofit purposes Production team without special permission from the copyright holder, Shradha Ghale (Consultant editor) provided acknowledgement of the source is made. Samuel Thomas (Senior editor) ICIMOD would appreciate receiving a copy of any Rachana Chettri (Editor) publication that uses this publication as a source. No Punam Pradhan (Graphic designer) use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior Photos: Jitendra Bajracharya permission in writing from ICIMOD. Citation The views and interpretations in this publication are ICIMOD (2019). Tourism planning (2020–2024) for Namkha Rural those of the author(s). They are not attributable to Municipality, Nepal, Proceedings, ICIMOD, Kathmandu ICIMOD and do not imply the expression of any opinion concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or the endorsement -
Food Security and Vulnerability Profile 2000 VAM Unit World Food
NEPAL Food Security and Vulnerability Profile 2000 VAM Unit World Food Programme Nepal September 2001 Nepal Food Security and Vulnerability Profile 2000 PREFACE Global food security and the struggle against hunger are priorities that have been repeatedly emphasised by the international community. In 1996, in the Rome declaration of the World Food Summit, Heads of State and Government of 186 countries of the world ‘reaffirmed the right of everyone to have access to safe and nutritious food, consistent with the right to adequate food and the fundamental right of everyone to be free from hunger.’ They came forward with an immediate view to reducing the number of undernourished people to half its present level no later than 2015. Past experience reveals that there is no easy way to escape from poverty, food insecurity and vulnerability. Additional efforts are needed to understand the factors that cause widespread hunger and poverty, and to design appropriate measures conducive towards an environment in which the goal of ‘food for all’ becomes a common goal, to which diverse initiatives are directed. For efficient utilisation of WFP resources, targeting is of the utmost importance and calls for an investigation into three interrelated questions: Who are the food insecure? Where are they? Why they are food insecure? With the objective of contributing to this effort, WFP/Nepal undertakes its own Vulnerability Analysis and Mapping. VAM at WFP Nepal performed secondary data analysis and produced a report which helped WFP to define its geographic targeting, as part of its new Country Programme (2002-06) design. More recently, to understand more fully the dynamics of food insecurity and vulnerability on the basis of vulnerable population’s own perceptions, WFP/Nepal carried out a field-based investigation; of which the outcome is this report before you. -
The Rufford Foundation Final Report
The Rufford Foundation Final Report Congratulations on the completion of your project that was supported by The Rufford Foundation. I ask all grant recipients to complete a Final Report Form that helps us to gauge the success of our grant giving. The Final Report must be sent in word format and not PDF format or any other format. I understand that projects often do not follow the predicted course but knowledge of your experiences is valuable to us and others who may be undertaking similar work. Please be as honest as you can in answering the questions – remember that negative experiences are just as valuable as positive ones if they help others to learn from them. Please complete the form in English and be as clear and concise as you can. Please note that the information may be edited for clarity. I will ask for further information if required. If you have any other materials produced by the project, particularly a few relevant photographs, please send these to us separately. Please submit your final report to [email protected]. Thank you for your help. Josh Cole, Grants Director Grant Recipient Details Your name Tenzing Lama Building local capacities for wildlife conservation Project title in Namkha region, Humla district, Nepal RSG reference 26480-1 Reporting period September 2018 – October 2019 Amount of grant £4,880 Your email address [email protected] Date of this report 22 October 2019 1. Please indicate the level of achievement of the project’s original objectives and include any relevant comments on factors affecting this. Objective achieved Not achieved Partially achieved Fully Comments To aware and educate local communities for wildlife conservation Household interviews to assess Because of early snow fall and livestock depredation patterns prolonged winter, I couldn’t to carnivores complete all the questionnaires. -
Status and Ethnobiology of Mountain Weasel Mustela Altaica in Humla District, Nepal
Status and ethnobiology of Mountain Weasel Mustela altaica in Humla district, Nepal Yadav GHIMIREY* and Raju ACHARYA Abstract Information on weasels Mustela in the western Himalayas is scarce, so even small numbers of records of them are of high value. Frequent sightings of Mountain Weasel Mustela altaica during May–June 2013 in Humla, Nepal, indicated that it is common there, even around settlements. Ethnobiological observations revealed killing of the species for superstition, but probably not at levels damaging to the population. Keywords: altitude, Limi valley, local beliefs, locality records, natural history, pika, superstition, threat हु륍ला जि쥍लामा पहाडी म쥍्ा車प्रो Mustela altaica को अवथा र मानि्ह셁्ँगको अꅍतर्륍बꅍध ्ारा車श ऩ�चिम हिमाऱयबाट साना मलसाॊप्रा Mustela ि셁को राम्रो जानकारी नभएकोऱ े यिाॉबाट ययनीि셁को सानो जानकारी ऩयन मि配वऩु셍 ण िुꅍछ । नेऩाऱको िु륍ऱा �जलऱामा २०१३ को म े देखि जुन स륍म गररएको अ鵍ययनको क्रममा ऩिाडी मलसाॊप्रो Mustela altaica धेरै ऩटक देखिएकोऱे यसको अवथा सामाꅍय नै िुनुऩन े यककन गन ण सककꅍछ । सामा�जक सवेक्ष셍को ऩरर셍ामऱ े अꅍधववचवासका कार셍 मायनसऱ े यसऱाई मान े गरेको ऩ配तो ऱाग े ऩयन माररन े दरऱ े भन े यसको अवथामा असर नऩान े देखिꅍछ । Introduction (DDC 2004). It lies in north-westernmost Nepal and borders Tibet Autonomous Region, China (Fig. 1). Within Humla, Limi Mountain (= Pale) Weasel Mustela altaica is one of six wea- village development committee (VDC; a VDC is an area, not a sel species reported from Nepal (Baral & Shah 2008, Chetri collection of people) was explored widely in May–June 2013.