DOCSLIB.ORG

The 2001 Season

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT HOLMUL, GUATEMALA. PRELIMINARY REPORT OF THE 2001 SEASON Francisco Estrada-Belli (Vanderbilt University) With contributions by Ryan Mongeluzzo (SUNY, Albany), Molly Morgan(Vanderbilt U.), Katie South (Boston U) ,Dan Slater (English Heritage), Jason Gonzales (Southern Illinois U., Carbondale), Marc Wolf (T.I.M.S.), Kristin Gardella, Justin Ebersole (Boston U.), Britta Watters, Luis Salazar, Mynor Silvestre, Mario Penados, Samuel Vasquez, Angel Chavez, Enrique Monterroso (USAC). Vanderbilt University Department of Anthropology Box 306050 station B Nashville, TN 37235 CONTENTS: Introduction....................................................................................................................... 3 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 3 SITE CENTER.................................................................................................................. 4 East Plaza........................................................................................................................... 4 Main Plaza ......................................................................................................................... 5 Group III, Court A ........................................................................................................... 6 Group III, Court B............................................................................................................ 6 Ball Court I........................................................................................................................ 8 Str. 13 Elite Courtyard..................................................................................................... 9 Stela 5 ................................................................................................................................. 9 Altar 3 .............................................................................................................................. 10 Group II, .......................................................................................................................... 10 Building B ........................................................................................................................ 10 Building F ........................................................................................................................ 10 CIVAL.............................................................................................................................. 10 T’OT................................................................................................................................. 11 RIVERONA..................................................................................................................... 12 LA SUFRICAYA ............................................................................................................ 12 K’O................................................................................................................................... 13 Conclusions and future directions................................................................................. 14 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................... 16 References........................................................................................................................ 17 Illustrations...................................................................................................................... 18 APPENDIX A, T’ot profile drawings.................................Error! Bookmark not defined. APPENDIX B, misc. profile drawing.................................Error! Bookmark not defined. APPENDIX C, ceramics sample illustrations .............................................................. 62 APPENDIX D, conservation illustrations..........................Error! Bookmark not defined. Cover page: Stela 5 from La Sufricaya. Photo: Justin Ebersole. 2 Introduction The present report summarizes the results of the 2001 field season of the Holmul Archaeological project at Holmul, Petén and other sites in its vicinity. This field season was made possible thanks to funding from the National Geographic Society, Vanderbilt University, the Ahau Foundation, and government permits extended by IDAEH of Guatemala. The HAP’01 team included 20 participants from US and Guatemalan academic institutions, 40 workmen and three cooks, and the help of several outside individuals. The field work was carried out between May 5th and June 30th 2001, and was followed by an extended period of data processing during the fall. The aim of the Holmul Archaeological Project is to develop and test new interpretive models on the nature and dynamic development of ancient Maya political, economic and ideological institution by analyzing the material correlates of such institutions in the context of a medium-sized Maya city of the Classic period. This research focuses on the archaeological investigation of the city of Holmul which is a key location in the region between Tikal, Naranjo and other major Maya cities. The site was first investigated in 1911 by Raymond E. Merwin of the Peabody Museum of Harvard University and it has the potential of providing an uninterrupted sequence of development from Preclassic to Terminal Classic times, of ceremonial, residential, burial and other contexts (Merwin and Vaillant 1932). We believe that through field survey and excavations, patterns of social organization, economic specialization and long distance interaction at Holmul will test new theoretical models of Classic Maya society. Specific research questions focus on the crucial historical, social and economic processes that led to the formation of dynastic lines at cities in the southern Maya Lowlands during the transition from the Late Preclassic to the Early Classic period (ca. A.D. 100-400). We are also interested in how the trajectory of architectural growth and decline of a Maya city can reflect historical and socio-economic processes that operate at different rates through time and space. How do land use and trade change over time during the Classic period? Is there any evidence from the perspective of a long-lived medium-sized city that can help us understand the Terminal Classic period in the Southern Lowlands? These topics will occupy several years of multi-disciplinary collaborative research including several sub-projects involving graduate dissertation work by Guatemalan and US students. Methodology The goal of the 2001 field season was to continue the program of systematic mapping and excavation initiated in 2000 in Holmul’s site center and peripheral areas (Estrada-Belli 2000, 2001, 2002): Phase 1 1) Exploration and detailed mapping of the site center and 2) of the residential areas by survey transects; use of GPS and geo-referenced aerial photos and satellite imagery to guide surveyors to important landform features and possible archaeological sites beyond the site core (Figure 1). 3 3) Investigate site chronology and architectural development through recording of looters' trenches profiles and test pit excavations Phase 2 4) Mapping of outlying minor centers within a 6 km radius. 5) Expanded archaeological excavations through axial trenching on plaza structures and sub-floor excavations within the site center. 6) Excavations at outlying minor centers, 7) stabilizing looted or damaged structures, 8) analysis of artifact chronology, manufacture technology, and long-distance interaction, using ceramic and stone tool data. Phase 3 9) Further expanded investigation of site center and outliers through large area clearings, trenching and sub-floor testing to include full range of architectural types, function and sizes in public and residential contexts. 10) stabilize architecture exposed by archaeological excavations. During the 2001 season mapping was continued in the site center, adding detail to the maps of Groups I and III and further expanding the mapped area of the East plaza. 250 m transects were mapped from the site center up to 1 km outwards in the four cardinal directions. Mapping was also carried out at the minor centers of Cival, T’ot, La Sufricaya, Riverona, and K’o. Excavations were placed in the East and Main plazas, near Group I, in Ball-Court I, in an elite courtyard (Str.13), on Group III Courts A and B and at other locations in the site center. These produced several important discoveries, including midden deposits, plaza floors, a ball-game marker, and a complex “throne room” (Group III Court B). Excavations and looters’ trenches were also recorded at La Sufricaya and T’ot, which uncovered carved monuments, large stucco masks, and mural paintings of some significance beyond the local Holmul context. SITE CENTER East Plaza The East Plaza is about 1 hectare in area and 130 by 68m, bounded by Ruin X to the west, Structure 7 on the east, Structure 5 to the north and Structure 46 on the south (Figure 2, 3). The paired layout of Ruin X and Structure 7 appears to match the model of Late Preclassic Group E at Uaxactun, and Tikal’s Mundo Perdido, as well as the Late Classic version of the same model known from several Eastern Petén sites as Complejo Ritual Publico (see Fialko 1988: 13-21; formerly known as “E-Groups”). In addition, three stelae (1, 2, 12) and two altars are located in this plaza along E-W and N-S axes and three fragments of monuments are
Recommended publications
  • “Charlie Chaplin” Figures of the Maya Lowlands

    “Charlie Chaplin” Figures of the Maya Lowlands

    RITUAL USE OF THE HUMAN FORM: A CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS OF THE “CHARLIE CHAPLIN” FIGURES OF THE MAYA LOWLANDS by LISA M. LOMITOLA B.A. University of Central Florida, 2008 A thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Anthropology in the College of Sciences at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Summer Term 2012 ©2012 Lisa M. Lomitola ii ABSTRACT Small anthropomorphic figures, most often referred to as “Charlie Chaplins,” appear in ritual deposits throughout the ancient Maya sites of Belize during the late Preclassic and Early Classic Periods and later, throughout the Petén region of Guatemala. Often these figures appear within similar cache assemblages and are carved from “exotic” materials such as shell or jade. This thesis examines the contexts in which these figures appear and considers the wider implications for commonly held ritual practices throughout the Maya lowlands during the Classic Period and the similarities between “Charlie Chaplin” figures and anthropomorphic figures found in ritual contexts outside of the Maya area. iii Dedicated to Corbin and Maya Lomitola iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Drs. Arlen and Diane Chase for the many opportunities they have given me both in the field and within the University of Central Florida. Their encouragement and guidance made this research possible. My experiences at the site of Caracol, Belize have instilled a love for archaeology in me that will last a lifetime. Thank you Dr. Barber for the advice and continual positivity; your passion and joy of archaeology inspires me. In addition, James Crandall and Jorge Garcia, thank you for your feedback, patience, and support; your friendship and experience are invaluable.
  • COMPENDIO DE LEYES SOBRE LA PROTECCIÓN DEL PATRIMONIO CULTURAL GUATEMALTECO Título: COMPENDIO DE LEYES SOBRE LA PROTECCIÓN DEL PATRIMONIO CULTURAL GUATEMALTECO

    COMPENDIO DE LEYES SOBRE LA PROTECCIÓN DEL PATRIMONIO CULTURAL GUATEMALTECO Título: COMPENDIO DE LEYES SOBRE LA PROTECCIÓN DEL PATRIMONIO CULTURAL GUATEMALTECO

    COMPENDIO DE LEYES SOBRE LA PROTECCIÓN DEL PATRIMONIO CULTURAL GUATEMALTECO Título: COMPENDIO DE LEYES SOBRE LA PROTECCIÓN DEL PATRIMONIO CULTURAL GUATEMALTECO Katherine Grigsby Representante y Directora de UNESCO en Guatemala Blanca Niño Norton Coordinadora Proyecto PROMUSEUM Oscar Mora, Consultor, Ministerio de Cultura y Deportes © UNESCO, 2006 ISBN: 92-9136-082-1 La Información contenida en esta publicación puede ser utilizada siempre que se cite la fuente. COMPENDIO DE LEYES SOBRE LA PROTECCIÓN DEL PATRIMONIO CULTURAL DE GUATEMALA CULTURAL DEL PATRIMONIO COMPENDIO DE LEYES SOBRE LA PROTECCIÓN ÍNDICE Constitución Política de la República de Guatemala 7 Ley para la Protección del Patrimonio Cultural de la Nación 9 Ley Protectora de la Ciudad de la Antigua Guatemala 25 Código Penal 35 Reglamento de Funcionamiento del Parque Nacional Tikal 39 Acuerdo Ministerial sobre Protección de Kaminal Juyú 43 Acuerdo Ministerial sobre las Normas para la Protección y uso de las Áreas Adyacentes afectas al Montículo de la Culebra y Acueducto de Pinula 45 Acuerdo de Creación de Zonas y Monumentos Arqueológicos Históricos y Artísticos de los Periodos Prehispánico e Hispánico 47 Acuerdo Ministerial Número 721-2003 56 Reglamento para la Protección y Conservación del Centro Histórico y los Conjuntos Históricos de la Ciudad de Guatemala 61 Convención para la Protección del Patrimonio Mundial, Cultural y Natural 69 Convención sobre las Medidas que deben adoptarse para Prohibir e Impedir la Importación, la Exportación y la Transferencia de Propiedad Ilícita
  • Archaeological Investigations in the Holmul Region, Peten Results of the Fourth Season, 2003

    Archaeological Investigations in the Holmul Region, Peten Results of the Fourth Season, 2003

    ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN THE HOLMUL REGION, PETEN RESULTS OF THE FOURTH SEASON, 2003 Edited by Francisco Estrada-Belli With contributions by: Jeremy Bauer, Molly Morgan, Angel Castillo, Nick Bentley, Jonathan Rodgers, Rush Clark (Cival), Jennifer Foley, Nina Neivens (La Sufricaya), Chris Hewitson, Judith Valle, Edy Barrios, Justin Ebersole, Juan Carlos Pere Calderón, Antonlin Velasquez (Holmul). Conservation reports by Angelyn Rivera and LeslieRainer Artelab s.r.l., Italy Preclassic mask on Structure 1, Group 1, at Cival. Address: Vanderbilt University Department of Anthropology Box 306050 St at ion B Nashville, TN 37235 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................4 Synthesis of analyses of mural fragments by Artelab, s.r.l., Italy.........................................................6 HOLMUL 2003 REPORTS PART I........................................................................................... 13 Conservation and Excavations at La Sufricaya.............................................................................. 14 FIGURES.............................................................................................................................. 16 La Sufricaya- ST 18 and SL07................................................................................................... 43 ST18 –Illustrations.................................................................................................................. 46 Informe Preliminar
  • Survey and Settlement at the Ancient Maya Site of Ka’Kabish, Northern Belize

    Survey and Settlement at the Ancient Maya Site of Ka’Kabish, Northern Belize

    SURVEY AND SETTLEMENT AT THE ANCIENT MAYA SITE OF KA’KABISH, NORTHERN BELIZE A Thesis Submitted to the Committee on Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Faculty of Arts and Science TRENT UNIVERSITY Peterborough, Ontario, Canada © Copyright by Alec McLellan 2012 Anthropology M.A. Graduate Program January 2013 ABSTRACT SURVEY AND SETTLEMENT AT THE ANCIENT MAYA SITE OF KA’KABISH, NORTHERN BELIZE Alec McLellan Archaeologists at the ancient Maya site of Ka’Kabish, in northern Belize, have begun to recreate the developmental history of this medium sized center. Over the course of the 2010 and 2011 field seasons, investigations of settlement surrounding the site revealed several areas of domestic occupation.Archaeologists conducted field survey and test-pit excavationsto investigate the distribution and density of these structures, as well as the occupation history, of the settlement zone. These investigations revealed that areasof the site wereoccupied as early as theLate Preclassic (300BC-AD100) until the Late Postclassic (AD1250-1521), approaching the Colonialperiod of early Maya history.Archaeologists compared distributional characteristics, along with structural densities, to other ancient Maya sites in Northern Belize. These results demonstrate changes in the Ka’Kabish community over time and space, providing yet another example of the variability in the rise and fall of ancient Maya polities. Key Words: Archaeology, Ancient Maya, Ka’Kabish, Archaeological Survey, Settlement ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I want to acknowledge my supervisory committee members – Dr. Paul Healy, Dr. Helen Haines, and Dr. Gyles Iannone – who offered me guidance and support throughout this process.Without their timely advice, and constant reminders, I would not have been able to complete this work.
  • Prehistoric Human-Environment Interactions in the Southern Maya Lowlands: the Holmul Region Case

    Prehistoric Human-Environment Interactions in the Southern Maya Lowlands: the Holmul Region Case

    Prehistoric Human-Environment Interactions in the Southern Maya Lowlands: The Holmul Region Case Final Report to the National Science Foundation 2010 Submitted by: Francisco Estrada-Belli and David Wahl Introduction Dramatic population changes evident in the Lowland Maya archaeological record have led scholars to speculate on the possible role of environmental degradation and climate change. As a result, several paleoecological and geochemical studies have been carried out in the Maya area which indicate that agriculture and urbanization may have caused significant forest clearance and soil erosion (Beach et al., 2006; Binford et al., 1987; Deevey et al., 1979; Dunning et al., 2002; Hansen et al., 2002; Jacob and Hallmark, 1996; Wahl et al., 2007). Studies also indicate that the late Holocene was characterized by centennial to millennial scale climatic variability (Curtis et al., 1996; Hodell et al., 1995; Hodell et al., 2001; Hodell et al., 2005b; Medina-Elizalde et al., 2010). These findings reinforce theories that natural or anthropogenically induced environmental change contributed to large population declines in the southern Maya lowlands at the end of the Preclassic (~A.D. 200) and Classic (~A.D. 900) periods. However, a full picture of the chronology and causes of environmental change during the Maya period has not emerged. Many records are insecurely dated, lacking from key cultural areas, or of low resolution. Dating problems have led to ambiguities regarding the timing of major shifts in proxy data (Brenner et al., 2002; Leyden, 2002; Vaughan et al., 1985). The result is a variety of interpretations on the impact of observed environmental changes from one site to another.
  • The Investigation of Classic Period Maya Warfare at Caracol, Belice

    The Investigation of Classic Period Maya Warfare at Caracol, Belice

    The Investigation of Classic Period Maya Warfare at Caracol, Belice ARLEN F. CHASE DIANE Z. CHASE University of Central Florida Prior to the 1950s the prevalent view of the like rulers who were concerned whith preserving ancient Maya was as a peaceful people. ln 1952, their histories in hieroglyphic texts on stone and Robert Rands completed his Ph. D. thesis on the stucco; investigations at the site have thus far evidences of warfare in Classic Maya art, following uncovered some 40 carved monuments (Beetz and up on the important work just completed by Tatia- Satterthwaite 1981; A. Chase and D. Chase na Proskouriakoff (1950). Since then, research has 1987b). Caracol is unusual, however, in having rapidly accumulated substantial documentation left us written records that it successfully waged that the Maya were in fact warlike (cf. Marcus warfare against two of its neighboring polities at 1974; Repetto Tio 1985). There is now evidence different times within the early part of the Late for the existence of wars between major political Classic Period. units in the Maya area and, importantly, Maya There are two wars documented in the hiero- kingship has also been shown to be inextricably glyphic texts: Caracol defeats Tikal in 9.6.8.4.2 or joined with concepts of war, captives, and sacrifice A. D. 562 (A. Chase and D. Chase 1987a:6, (Demarest 1978; Schele and Miller 1986; Freidel 1987b:33,60; S. Houston in press) and Naranjo in 1986). Warfare also has been utilized as a power- 9.9.18.16.3 or A. D. 631 (Sosa and Reents 1980).
  • The PARI Journal Vol. XII, No. 3

    The PARI Journal Vol. XII, No. 3

    ThePARIJournal A quarterly publication of the Pre-Columbian Art Research Institute Volume XII, No. 3, Winter 2012 Excavations of Nakum Structure 15: Discoveryof Royal Burials and In This Issue: Accompanying Offerings JAROSŁAW ŹRAŁKA Excavations of Institute of Archaeology, Jagiellonian University NakumStructure15: WIESŁAW KOSZKUL Discovery of Institute of Archaeology, Jagiellonian University Royal Burials and BERNARD HERMES Accompanying Proyecto Arqueológico Nakum, Guatemala Offerings SIMON MARTIN by University of Pennsylvania Museum Jarosław Źrałka Introduction the Triangulo Project of the Guatemalan Wiesław Koszkul Institute of Anthropology and History Bernard Hermes Two royal burials along with many at- (IDAEH). As a result of this research, the and tendant offerings were recently found epicenter and periphery of the site have Simon Martin in a pyramid located in the Acropolis been studied in detail and many structures complex at the Maya site of Nakum. These excavated and subsequently restored PAGES 1-20 discoveries were made during research (Calderón et al. 2008; Hermes et al. 2005; conducted under the aegis of the Nakum Hermes and Źrałka 2008). In 2006, thanks Archaeological Project, which has been to permission granted from IDAEH, a excavating the site since 2006. Artefacts new archaeological project was started Joel Skidmore discovered in the burials and the pyramid Editor at Nakum (The Nakum Archaeological [email protected] significantly enrich our understanding of Project) directed by Wiesław Koszkul the history of Nakum and throw new light and Jarosław Źrałka from the Jagiellonian Marc Zender on its relationship with neighboring sites. University, Cracow, Poland. Recently our Associate Editor Nakum is one of the most important excavations have focused on investigating [email protected] Maya sites located in the northeastern two untouched pyramids located in the Peten, Guatemala, in the area of the Southern Sector of the site, in the area of The PARI Journal Triangulo Park (a “cultural triangle” com- the so-called Acropolis.
  • Archaeological Investigations at Holmul, Petén, Guatemala Preliminary Results of the Third Season, 2002

    Archaeological Investigations at Holmul, Petén, Guatemala Preliminary Results of the Third Season, 2002

    FAMSI © 2003: Francisco Estrada-Belli Archaeological Investigations at Holmul, Petén, Guatemala Preliminary Results of the Third Season, 2002 With contributions by Britta Watters, John Tomasic (Vanderbilt U.) Katie South (S. Illinois U.), Chris Hewitson (English Heritage), Marc Wolf (T.A.M.S.), Kristen Gardella (U. Penn.), Justin Ebersole, James Doyle, David Bell, Andie Gehlhausen (Vanderbilt U.), Kristen Klein (Florida State U.), Collin Watters (Western Illinois, U.), Claudio Lozano Guerra-Librero (Anphorae), Jena DeJuilio, Shoshuanna Parks (Boston U.), Raul Archila, Luis Salazar, Mynor Silvestre, Mario Penados, Angel Chavez, Enrique Monterroso (USAC, CUDEP). Research Year: 2002 Culture: Maya Chronology: Late Pre-Classic to Classic Location: Petén, Guatemala Sites: Holmul, Cival, Hahakab and La Sufricaya Table of Contents Introduction Methodology Synopsis of the 2002 season results Discovery of Hahakab Other Explorations in the Holmul area Mapping at Holmul Excavations within Holmul site center Group 13 Group III, Court A Group III, Court B South Group 1 Salvage excavations at K’o Investigations at La Sufricaya Summary of excavations in Str. 1 Imaging of the La Sufricaya Murals 1-3 Conservation of Murals Summary of excavations in Stelae 4, 5, 6, 8 Residential buildings at La Sufricaya Investigations at Cival Conclusions and future research directions Acknowledgements List of Figures Sources Cited Appendix A. Ceramics Appendix B. Drawings Appendix C. Epigraphy Introduction The present report summarizes the results of the 2002 field season of the Holmul Archaeological Project at Holmul, Petén and at the sites of Cival, Hahakab and La Sufricaya in its vicinity (Figure 1). This field season was made possible thanks to funding from the National Geographic Society, Vanderbilt University, the Ahau Foundation, FAMSI, Interco, as well as permits extended by IDAEH of Guatemala.
  • Maya Osteobiographies of the Holmul Region, Guatemala

    Maya Osteobiographies of the Holmul Region, Guatemala

    BOSTON UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES Dissertation MAYA OSTEOBIOGRAPHIES OF THE HOLMUL REGION, GUATEMALA: CURATING LIFE HISTORIES THROUGH BIOARCHAEOLOGY AND STABLE ISOTOPE ANALYSIS By AVIVA ANN CORMIER B.A., Brandeis University, 2009 M.A., Boston University, 2015 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2018 © 2018 by Aviva Ann Cormier All rights reserved Approved by First Reader David M. Carballo, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Archaeology Second Reader Jonathan Bethard, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Anthropology University of South Florida Third Reader Jane E. Buikstra, Ph.D. Regents’ Professor Arizona State University DEDICATION To my family, my mother, and Chad. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The completion of this dissertation and this stage of my academic journey would not have been possible without so many individuals and institutions. Thank you to my committee- David Carballo, Mac Marston, Jon Bethard, and Jane Buikstra- for their invaluable guidance and advice. Without their patience, encouragement, and inspiration, this dissertation would not have been possible. David and Mac, thank you for welcoming me as your student and providing me with endless support. Jon, thank you for being my mentor and friend and for teaching me the ways of the Dremel. Thank you, Jane, for introducing me to Kampsville and inspiring me to be a better bioarchaeologist. I also wish to thank Bill Saturno for welcoming me to BU and guiding me through the challenging start of my academic career. Thank you, Francisco Estrada-Belli, for the opportunity to work with the Holmul Archaeological Project and your support of my work both in Guatemala and in Boston.
  • Ceremonial Plazas in the Cival Region, Guatemala

    Ceremonial Plazas in the Cival Region, Guatemala

    Monumental Foundations: An Investigation of the Preclassic Development of Civic- Ceremonial Plazas in the Cival Region, Guatemala by Kaitlin R. Ahern May 2020 A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Graduate School of the University at Buffalo, The State University of New York in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Anthropology This page is intentionally left blank. ii Copyright by Kaitlin R. Ahern 2020 II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: There is a long list of individuals and organizations that have both contributed to my formation as both an archaeologist and as a scholar. I am immensely grateful to my advisor, Dr. Timothy Chevral and committee members Dr. Douglas Perrelli and Dr. Sarunas Milisauskas, for their guidance and assistance in the completion of my doctorate. I am thankful to Warren Barbour for warmly accepting me into the Master’s program at the University at Buffalo and welcoming me into UB’s Teotihuacan Archaeology Laboratory. I will always treasure my memories with him discussing the formation of cities and states, especially urban planning and Teotihuacan. He will be greatly missed. Timothy Chevral graciously became my new chair once Warren Barbour retired. Throughout my graduate school education, he taught a wide array of courses that served to enrich my anthropological and archaeological understanding. His courses also greatly enhanced my knowledge regarding archaeological theory and introduced me to the archaeological sciences. Douglas Perrelli provided me with a North American perspective to my research and spent time helping me prepare for my advanced exams. Sarunas Milisauskas taught me about the history of archaeology and how it has impacted archaeological approaches in other countries.
  • Amenaza Por Deslizamientos E Inundaciones

    Amenaza Por Deslizamientos E Inundaciones

    AMENAZA CODIGO: AMENAZA POR DESLIZAMIENTOS E INUNDACIONES POR DESLIZAMIENTOS DEPARTAMENTO DE PETEN La pre d ic c ión d e e sta am e naza utiliza la m e tod ología re c onoc id a 1712 d e Mora-V ahrson, para e stim ar las am e nazas d e d e slizam ie ntos a un nive l d e d e talle d e 1 kilóm e tro. Esta c om ple ja m od e lac ión utiliza una c om binac ión d e d atos sobre la litología, la hum e d ad d e l sue lo, MUNICIPIO DE POPTÚN pe nd ie nte y pronóstic os d e tie m po e n e ste c aso pre c ipitac ión 550000.000000 560000.000000 570000.000000 580000.000000 590000^.000000 600000.000000 610000.000000 620000.000000 630000.000000 640000.000000 650000.000000 90°0'W 89°50'W 89°40'W " 89°30'W 89°20'W 89°10'W ac um ulad a q ue CATHALAC ge ne ra d iariam e nte a través d e l " " m od e lo m e sosc ale PSU/N CAR, e l MM5. Finca El Rosario El Pacay Pantano " " Sitio é Finca La San Valentin "San Juan t Laguneta La Finca La R ic "Moquena Las Flores Parcelamiento Arqueologico Río L" a Fí uenten Se e stim a e sta am e naza e n térm inos d e ‘Baja’, ‘Me d ia’ y ‘Alta‘. "Colorada "Chapala Finca El " Colpeten o Sa San Morena R Colorada " R " " Quibix El Pumpal El Chal La P" uente " " " Dolores "Camayal Finca La "Marcos Laguneta " Finca Las Estrella "Sanicte Santo " "El Campo E B e lE i c e Joyas La Colorada Finca " Toribio " Finca " " Finca Luz Del Campuc R " " í Río Chiquibul Rancho Brasilia Cristo Rey Valle o Finca Valle " S V Grande V Alta " Finca a De Las Finca c Mopan A Sabaneta u Manuel " Esmeraldas Z l " La Paz " A Tres L Comunidad L " " N
  • Anthropology 35: 59-74

    Anthropology 35: 59-74

    ARCHAEOLOGY 551 The Early Maya: Studies in Mesoamerican Archaeology Professor: Dr. William A. Saturno E-mail: [email protected] Office: Tent in the middle of camp [email protected] COURSE DESCRIPTION: Welcome to San Bartolo! This course invites you to experience first-hand what Maya civilization was like by teaching you how archaeologists use traces of the past to reconstruct ancient societies. You will be reading about the Maya and learning about their environment, their daily activities and their extraordinary craft, their small villages and their large cities. At the same time you will observe around you and practice the archaeologists’ theories and methods highlighted in the required readings for this course. You will experience the jungle environment through camp life, survey and mapping, excavate humble ceramic pots and utilitarian tools, masonry architecture, and unique painted stucco walls, and you will travel to visit sites that together represent some of the highest achievements of Maya culture. COURSE REQUIREMENTS: Your final grade in this course will be determined by your performance on your weekly attendance at and active participation in discussions (25%), 3 short papers (10% each) and a final exam (45%). We will meet on Saturdays from 8:00am-12:00pm to discuss the week’s theme and their impacts of, and potential problems with, the assigned readings. REQUIRED TEXTS: There is one textbook required for this course and several readings that will be made available for you. All assigned readings should be completed before coming to the seminar, as they will form the basis for both discussions and exam.