DOCSLIB.ORG

2005 in Fi 2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ADDRESS LIST 2005 IN FIGURES GRUPO FERROVIAL Million euro Príncipe de Vergara, 135 2005* 2004* 2003 2002 2001 2000 % CAGR% 28002 Madrid 05/04 05/00 FINANCIAL Tel. +34 91 586 25 00 DATA Fax +34 91 586 26 77 ANNUAL REPORT 2005 ANNUAL REPORT Net sales 8,989 7,254 6,026 5,040 4,240 3,598 24% 20% Operating income 871.3 716.8 614.9 485.1 389 271 22% 26% Net income 415.8 528.6 340.6 455.8 218 159 -21% 21% FERROVIAL AGROMÁN FERROVIAL INMOBILIARIA Net income (1) 415.8 289.9 296.2 257.9 Ribera del Loira, 42 López de Hoyos, 35 Parque Empresarial Puerta de las Naciones 28002 Madrid Earnings per share 2.96 3.77 2.43 3.25 1.56 1.14 -21% 21% (1) 28042 Madrid Earnings per share 2.96 2.07 2.11 1.84 Tel. +34 91 586 99 00 Total assets 21,412 15,161 14,552 11,267 10,981 8,821 Fax +34 91 586 25 56 Tel. +34 91 300 85 00 Equity 3,025 2,518 1,754 1,495 1,198 1,050 Fax +34 91 300 88 96 Gross capital expenditure 1,665 389 862 541 430 367 Net debt/(Cash) 272 (139) 591 (303) 287 417 FERROVIAL SERVICIOS Total gross dividend 126.3 115.0 84.2 92.1 55.9 38.6 (1) FERROVIAL INFRAESTRUCTURAS Serrano Galvache, 56 Total gross dividend 85.6 64.5 Plaza Manuel Gómez Moreno, 2 Edificio Madroño - Parque Norte Edificio Alfredo Mahou 28033 Madrid 28020 Madrid OPERATING DATA Tel. +34 91 338 83 00 Tel. +34 91 418 56 00 Fax +34 91 388 52 38 Number of employees 57,247 49,892 34,347 28,454 23,522 24,208 Fax +34 91 555 12 41 Construction backlog 7,500 6,721 6,106 5,922 5,599 5,283 Real Estate pre-sales 788 694 720 655 603 601 Services backlog 7,174 (2) 4,973 (2) 5,177 (2) 816 718 729 SHAREHOLDER RELATIONS Príncipe de Vergara, 135 RATIOS 28002 Madrid Tel. 902 25 30 50 EBIT margin 9.7% 9.9% 10.2% 9.6% 8.8% 7.5% e-mail: [email protected] Net margin 4.6% 7.3% 5.7% 9.0% 5.1% 4.4% ROE 20.6% 17.2% 20.0% 33.9% 19.4% 16.1% ROE (1) 19.4% 21.0% 20.7% Leverage 9% 34% 24% 39% If you have any queries about any aspect of the Annual Report, please contact: Pay-out 30% 22% 25% 21% 26% 24% Pay-out (1) 30% 40% 28% 26% EXTERNAL RELATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT Príncipe de Vergara, 135 28002 Madrid PER SHARE DATA e-mail: [email protected] Capitalisation 8,206 5,515 3,897 3,387 2,762 1,908 www.ferrovial.com Year-end share price 58.5 39.32 27.78 24.15 19.69 13.60 Average daily trading volume (value) 27.5 12.7 12.0 10.2 6.3 4.6 Gross dividend per share 0.90 0.82 0.60 0.67 0.41 0.28 Gross dividend per share (1) 0.61 0.47 Appreciation in the year 49% 42% 15% 23% 45% -6% No. of shares at year-end 140,264,743 140,264,743 140,264,743 140,264,743 140,264,743 140,264,743 (1) ANNUAL Excluding non-recurring income at Cintra due to the IPO (2004), reversal of provisions in 2003 and sale of 40% to Macquarie (2002) (2) Does not include the Tube Lines backlog REPORT (*) Data conform to IAS 2005 ADDRESS LIST 2005 IN FIGURES GRUPO FERROVIAL Million euro Príncipe de Vergara, 135 2005* 2004* 2003 2002 2001 2000 % CAGR% 28002 Madrid 05/04 05/00 FINANCIAL Tel. +34 91 586 25 00 DATA Fax +34 91 586 26 77 ANNUAL REPORT 2005 ANNUAL REPORT Net sales 8,989 7,254 6,026 5,040 4,240 3,598 24% 20% Operating income 871.3 716.8 614.9 485.1 389 271 22% 26% Net income 415.8 528.6 340.6 455.8 218 159 -21% 21% FERROVIAL AGROMÁN FERROVIAL INMOBILIARIA Net income (1) 415.8 289.9 296.2 257.9 Ribera del Loira, 42 López de Hoyos, 35 Parque Empresarial Puerta de las Naciones 28002 Madrid Earnings per share 2.96 3.77 2.43 3.25 1.56 1.14 -21% 21% (1) 28042 Madrid Earnings per share 2.96 2.07 2.11 1.84 Tel. +34 91 586 99 00 Total assets 21,412 15,161 14,552 11,267 10,981 8,821 Fax +34 91 586 25 56 Tel. +34 91 300 85 00 Equity 3,025 2,518 1,754 1,495 1,198 1,050 Fax +34 91 300 88 96 Gross capital expenditure 1,665 389 862 541 430 367 Net debt/(Cash) 272 (139) 591 (303) 287 417 FERROVIAL SERVICIOS Total gross dividend 126.3 115.0 84.2 92.1 55.9 38.6 (1) FERROVIAL INFRAESTRUCTURAS Serrano Galvache, 56 Total gross dividend 85.6 64.5 Plaza Manuel Gómez Moreno, 2 Edificio Madroño - Parque Norte Edificio Alfredo Mahou 28033 Madrid 28020 Madrid OPERATING DATA Tel. +34 91 338 83 00 Tel. +34 91 418 56 00 Fax +34 91 388 52 38 Number of employees 57,247 49,892 34,347 28,454 23,522 24,208 Fax +34 91 555 12 41 Construction backlog 7,500 6,721 6,106 5,922 5,599 5,283 Real Estate pre-sales 788 694 720 655 603 601 Services backlog 7,174 (2) 4,973 (2) 5,177 (2) 816 718 729 SHAREHOLDER RELATIONS Príncipe de Vergara, 135 RATIOS 28002 Madrid Tel. 902 25 30 50 EBIT margin 9.7% 9.9% 10.2% 9.6% 8.8% 7.5% e-mail: [email protected] Net margin 4.6% 7.3% 5.7% 9.0% 5.1% 4.4% ROE 20.6% 17.2% 20.0% 33.9% 19.4% 16.1% ROE (1) 19.4% 21.0% 20.7% Leverage 9% 34% 24% 39% If you have any queries about any aspect of the Annual Report, please contact: Pay-out 30% 22% 25% 21% 26% 24% Pay-out (1) 30% 40% 28% 26% EXTERNAL RELATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT Príncipe de Vergara, 135 28002 Madrid PER SHARE DATA e-mail: [email protected] Capitalisation 8,206 5,515 3,897 3,387 2,762 1,908 www.ferrovial.com Year-end share price 58.5 39.32 27.78 24.15 19.69 13.60 Average daily trading volume (value) 27.5 12.7 12.0 10.2 6.3 4.6 Gross dividend per share 0.90 0.82 0.60 0.67 0.41 0.28 Gross dividend per share (1) 0.61 0.47 Appreciation in the year 49% 42% 15% 23% 45% -6% No. of shares at year-end 140,264,743 140,264,743 140,264,743 140,264,743 140,264,743 140,264,743 (1) ANNUAL Excluding non-recurring income at Cintra due to the IPO (2004), reversal of provisions in 2003 and sale of 40% to Macquarie (2002) (2) Does not include the Tube Lines backlog REPORT (*) Data conform to IAS 2005 DOW JONES THE GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY INDEXES FTSE4Good COMPACT SIGNIFICANT EVENTS 2005-2006 INTERNATIONALISATION DIVERSIFICATION AGENDA EXPANSION IN THE UNITED INAUGURATION IN IRELAND ENTRANCE INTO REVENUES 2005 CONSTRUCTION INFRASTRUCTURE 1. Examination and approval of the financial statements - balance sheet, income statement and notes to KINGDOM Cintra opened its first Irish toll THE US CONSTRUCTION 8.9 billion euro financial statements - and the management report of the Company for the year ended 31 December Revenues 4,387.3 Revenues 760.3 Amey bought professional road, the N4/N6, ten months MARKET International 2005. 43% EBIT 204.8 EBIT 301.9 services firm Owen Williams. ahead of schedule. Ferrovial announced the EBIT margin (%) 4.8 EBIT margin (%) 39.7 February 2006 December 2005 acquisition of Webber, one of the Spain Backlog 7,500 Committed investment 2,000 2. Examination and approval of the financial statements - balance sheet, income statement and notes to 57% leading construction companies Operating cash flow 502 Operating cash flow 414 financial statements - and the management report of the Company's consolidated group for the year in Texas, the second-largest ended 31 December 2005. STRENGTHENED POSITION DIVESTMENT OF ONO infrastructure market in the US. IN THE USA Sale of a 9.6% stake in the REAL ESTATE SERVICES August 2005 3. Proposed distribution of income for the year 2005. Cintra was chosen as preferred telecommunications operator. REVENUES 1998 2.4 billion euro Revenues 813.6 Revenues 3,200.1 bidder for the Indiana Toll Road, November 2005 EBIT 156.0 EBIT 215.3 4. the second toll road to be AIRPORT SERVICES International Examination and approval of the management of the Board of Directors in 2005. 11% EBIT margin (%) 19.2 EBIT margin (%) 6.7 privatised in the US. Ferrovial acquired Swissport, the Backlog 1,085 Backlog* 7,174 MARKET LEADER IN Spain 5. Reappointment of Directors: January 2006 world's leading independent 89% Operating cash flow 61 Operating cash flow 169 WASTE MANAGEMENT handling operator. * Does not include Tube Lines backlog Million euro IN CATALUÑA August 2005 5.1 Reappointment of Rafael del Pino y Calvo-Sotelo. “BUILDING SCHOOLS FOR THE Cespa awarded contract to REVENUES 1998 REVENUES 2005 5.2 Reappointment of Casa Grande de Cartagena, S.L. FUTURE" PROGRAMME manage Barcelona Ecopark IV.
Recommended publications
  • The Operator's Story Appendix

    The Operator's Story Appendix

    Railway and Transport Strategy Centre The Operator’s Story Appendix: London’s Story © World Bank / Imperial College London Property of the World Bank and the RTSC at Imperial College London Community of Metros CoMET The Operator’s Story: Notes from London Case Study Interviews February 2017 Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide a permanent record for the researchers of what was said by people interviewed for ‘The Operator’s Story’ in London. These notes are based upon 14 meetings between 6th-9th October 2015, plus one further meeting in January 2016. This document will ultimately form an appendix to the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’ piece Although the findings have been arranged and structured by Imperial College London, they remain a collation of thoughts and statements from interviewees, and continue to be the opinions of those interviewed, rather than of Imperial College London. Prefacing the notes is a summary of Imperial College’s key findings based on comments made, which will be drawn out further in the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’. Method This content is a collation in note form of views expressed in the interviews that were conducted for this study. Comments are not attributed to specific individuals, as agreed with the interviewees and TfL. However, in some cases it is noted that a comment was made by an individual external not employed by TfL (‘external commentator’), where it is appropriate to draw a distinction between views expressed by TfL themselves and those expressed about their organisation.
  • London Underground Public Private Partnerships

    London Underground Public Private Partnerships

    House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts London Underground Public Private Partnerships Seventeenth Report of Session 2004–05 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 9 March 2005 HC 446 Incorporating HC 783-i, Session 2003–04 Published on 31 March 2005 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £13.50 The Committee of Public Accounts The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No 148). Current membership Mr Edward Leigh MP (Conservative, Gainsborough) (Chairman) Mr Richard Allan MP (Liberal Democrat, Sheffield Hallam) Mr Richard Bacon MP (Conservative, South Norfolk) Mrs Angela Browning MP (Conservative, Tiverton and Honiton) Jon Cruddas MP (Labour, Dagenham) Rt Hon David Curry MP (Conservative, Skipton and Ripon) Mr Ian Davidson MP (Labour, Glasgow Pollock) Rt Hon Frank Field MP (Labour, Birkenhead) Mr Brian Jenkins MP (Labour, Tamworth) Mr Nigel Jones MP (Liberal Democrat, Cheltenham) Jim Sheridan MP (Labour, West Renfrewshire) Mr Siôn Simon MP (Labour, Birmingham Erdington) Mr Gerry Steinberg MP (Labour, City of Durham) Mr Stephen Timms MP (Labour, East Ham) Jon Trickett MP (Labour, Hemsworth) Rt Hon Alan Williams MP (Labour, Swansea West) The following was also a member of the Committee during the period of this inquiry. Ms Ruth Kelly MP (Labour, Bolton West) Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 148.
  • May CARG 2020.Pdf

    May CARG 2020.Pdf

    ISSUE 30 – MAY 2020 ISSUE 30 – MAY ISSUE 29 – FEBRUARY 2020 Promoting positive mental health in teenagers and those who support them through the provision of mental health education, resilience strategies and early intervention What we offer Calm Harm is an Clear Fear is an app to Head Ed is a library stem4 offers mental stem4’s website is app to help young help children & young of mental health health conferences a comprehensive people manage the people manage the educational videos for students, parents, and clinically urge to self-harm symptoms of anxiety for use in schools education & health informed resource professionals www.stem4.org.uk Registered Charity No 1144506 Any individuals depicted in our images are models and used solely for illustrative purposes. We all know of young people, whether employees, family or friends, who are struggling in some way with mental health issues; at ARL, we are so very pleased to support the vital work of stem4: early intervention really can make a difference to young lives. Please help in any way that you can. ADVISER RANKINGS – CORPORATE ADVISERS RANKINGS GUIDE MAY 2020 | Q2 | ISSUE 30 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted The Corporate Advisers Rankings Guide is available to UK subscribers at £180 per in any form or by any means (including photocopying or recording) without the annum for four updated editions, including postage and packaging. A PDF version written permission of the copyright holder except in accordance with the provision is also available at £360 + VAT. of copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Barnard’s Inn, 86 Fetter Lane, London, EC4A To appear in the Rankings Guide or for subscription details, please contact us 1EN.
  • Crr 412/2002

    Crr 412/2002

    HSE Health & Safety Executive A survey of UK approaches to sharing good practice in health and safety risk management Prepared by Risk Solutions for the Health and Safety Executive CONTRACT RESEARCH REPORT 412/2002 HSE Health & Safety Executive A survey of UK approaches to sharing good practice in health and safety risk management E Baker Risk Solutions 1st floor, Central House 14 Upper Woburn Place London, WC1H 0JN United Kingdom The concept of good practice is central to HSE’s approach to regulation of health and safety management. There must therefore be a common understanding of what good practice is and where it can be found. A survey was conducted to explore how industry actually identifies good practice in health and safety management, decides how to adopt it, and how this is communicated with others. The findings are based primarily on a segmentation of the survey results by organisation size, due to homogeneity of the returns along other axes of analysis. A key finding is that there is no common understanding of the term good practice or how this is distinguished from best practice. Regulatory interpretation of good practice is perceived to be inconsistent. Three models were identified: A) Large organisations, primarily in privatised industries, have effective Trade Associations where good practice is developed and guidance disseminated industry-wide. B) Large and medium-sized organisations in competitive industries have ineffective trade associations. They develop good practices in-house and may only share these with their competitors when forced to do so. C) Small organisations have little contact with their competitors.
  • J Jarvis & Sons Ltd V Blue Circle Dartford Estates Ltd [2007]

    J Jarvis & Sons Ltd V Blue Circle Dartford Estates Ltd [2007]

    J Jarvis & Sons Ltd v Blue Circle Dartford Estates Ltd [2007] APP.L.R. 05/14 JUDGMENT : MR JUSTICE JACKSON: TCC. 14th May 2007 1. This judgment is in seven parts, namely, Part 1 "Introduction"; Part 2 "The Facts"; Part 3 "The Present Proceedings"; Part 4 "The Law"; Part 5 "The Application for an Injunction"; Part 6 "Jarvis's Challenges to the Interim Award"; and Part 7 "Conclusion". Part 1: Introduction 2. This is an action brought by a main contractor in order to prevent the continuance of an arbitration. The contractor seeks to achieve that result either by means of an injunction or, alternatively, by challenging an Interim Award of the Arbitrator. This litigation has been infused with some urgency because it was launched just fifteen days before the date fixed for the start of arbitration hearing. 3. J Jarvis & Sons Limited is claimant in these proceedings and defendant in the arbitration. Prior to 18th February 1997, the name of this company was J Jarvis & Sons plc. I shall refer to the company as "Jarvis". Jarvis is the subsidiary company of Jarvis plc. Blue Circle Dartford Estates Limited is defendant in these proceedings and claimant in the arbitration. I shall refer to this party as "Blue Circle". Blue Circle is a subsidiary company of Blue Circle Industries plc. The solicitors for the parties will feature occasionally in the narrative. Squire & Co are solicitors for Jarvis. Howrey LLP are solicitors for Blue Circle. 4. I turn now to other companies which will feature in the narrative of events. GEFCO (UK) Limited are forwarding agents.
  • Using the London Underground the London Underground

    Using the London Underground the London Underground

    Using the London Underground The London Underground (also called the Tube) can be very daunting to anyone using the system for the first time – the crowds of people and bombardment of new sensory input can present a challenge in itself! To help you prepare for your journey, here’s some information on what to expect, as well as other tips and tricks to improve the experience. Entrance/Exit 2, Marble Arch Where do I need to go? The famous Tube map, available online and as a leaflet at Tube stations, shows which lines run through which stations across the entire network, allowing you to work out a route between your starting point and your destination. Stations where you can change lines are normally marked on the map with a white circle, although stations with step-free access will instead be marked with a white or blue circle including a wheelchair symbol. Part of the Tube map, showing central London Alternatively, various map websites and apps offer a journey planner tool – just type in two stations and you’ll be shown the quickest route and an approximate journey time. Transport for London’s own journey planner, which also includes other TfL-run transport such as buses, allows you to request step-free access, routes with fewest changes, and a host of other accessibility options. Always check for closures and delays on the day before you travel, for example on the TfL website – sometimes lines close at the weekend for maintenance, and this information will be available in advance. If you have Twitter, you can follow the accounts for TfL and the specific accounts for your most commonly used lines for up- to-date information.
  • Item 6 Tube Lines Periodic Review: Response to Arbiter's Draft Findings

    Item 6 Tube Lines Periodic Review: Response to Arbiter's Draft Findings

    AGENDA ITEM 6 TRANSPORT FOR LONDON BOARD SUBJECT: TUBE LINES PERIODIC REVIEW: RESPONSE TO ARBITER’S DRAFT FINDINGS DATE: 3 FEBRUARY 2010 1 PURPOSE AND DECISION REQUIRED 1.1 The purpose of this paper is to: (a) provide a summary of the Arbiter’s findings issued on 17 December 2009 and the implications thereof; (b) describe LU’s response made to the Arbiter on 1 February 2010; (c) describe the position on Tube Lines (TLL) related issues, particularly as regards the line upgrades and claims; and (d) address the issue of the affordability of the works to be undertaken by TLL in the second Review Period (RP2) of the PPP Contract and the response to be made to the Arbiter’s questions on this issue. 1.2 The Board is asked to (i) note the contents of this report and the responses from LU and the Mayor to the Arbiter’s draft directions and (ii) to agree TfL’s response. 2 BACKGROUND 2.1 The PPP Contract with TLL commenced on 1 January 2003. It is a 30 year contract with a ‘Periodic Review’ every 7.5 years to re-set the costs going forward. The contract requires certain key deliverables (eg the Jubilee line upgrade) plus a general obligation to improve asset condition and deliver a target level of asset performance. LU pays TLL an ‘Infrastructure Service Charge’ (ISC) each 4-week period. 2.2 Under the contract TLL’s shareholders (now comprising Ferrovial and Bechtel) are entitled to earn an equity rate of return of 26%, and in addition TLL has Secondment Agreements with the shareholders under which a number (circa 150) of individuals are loaned to TLL.
  • Public Private Partnership Foreign Case Studies Report

    Public Private Partnership Foreign Case Studies Report

    Foreign PPP Case Study Analysis Report FINAL Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 1 1.0 Introduction......................................................................................................... 13 1.1 Document Purpose ......................................................................................... 13 1.2 Report Structure.............................................................................................. 13 2.0 Background ........................................................................................................ 13 3.0 Project Objectives............................................................................................... 14 4.0 Approach to Case Study Analysis ......................................................................14 5.0 Introduction to PPPs and PSC............................................................................15 5.1 Public Private Partnerships............................................................................. 15 5.2 Public Sector Comparator............................................................................... 19 6.0 Case Study Summaries...................................................................................... 22 6.1 Canada Line.................................................................................................... 23 6.2 London Underground.....................................................................................
  • London Underground - 150 Years and Beyond

    London Underground - 150 Years and Beyond

    A London Councils Member briefing January 2014 London Underground - 150 Years and Beyond 2013 saw celebrations of 150 years of an underground railway in London. The underground has changed and shaped the way people live in the capital and this anniversary has provided Transport for London with the opportunity to set out a vision for its future. Overview This briefing summarises Transport for London’s (TfL) vision for the future of the underground (Tube). Gareth Powell, Director of Strategy at London Underground, gave a presentation to the meeting of the Transport and Environment Committee on 12 December 2013. He stated London Underground’s priorities for the future are: • Keeping London Moving- Reliability and safely • Keeping London Growing - Capacity from the current network and from growing the network • Making Life in London Better - Customer service where every journey matters The vision also includes five commitments to Londoners: 1. Introduce a new 24-hour Tube service at weekends 2. Further improve the reliability and capacity of services 3. All Tube stations are controlled and staffed while services operating 4. Make journeys easier for customers – supported by technology 5. Deliver improvements with the best possible value for money Analysis For 150 years the Tube has been constantly evolving to meet the needs of Londoners. Today, the Tube travels 43 million miles and carries over one billion passengers a year. There have been many key milestones since it first opened in 1863, 10 are highlighted below: 1890 First deep level electric Tube railway in the world and access to platforms by hydaulic lift 1905-38 The Tube reshapes suburban London, including the development of ‘Metroland’ 1968-69 First computer-controlled underground railway in the world, with automatic trains and ticket gates 1977 First airport link for the Tube, with Picadilly line extension to Heathrow Central (terminals 1,2 and 3).
  • Appendix 2 PPP Equity Sales with Profits Data in UK (1998-2012)

    Appendix 2 PPP Equity Sales with Profits Data in UK (1998-2012)

    PPP Wealth Machine: UK and Global trends in trading project ownership Appendix 2 PPP equity sales with profits data in UK (1998-2012) Vendor PPP project No. of Purchaser of % share Price Profit/ Annual PPP equity holding £m loss Rate of sold £m Return at time of equity sale 1998 Serco Ltd Defence Helicopter Flying 1 FR Aviation Ltd and 33.0 3.4 plus 4.6 179.3 School (FBS Limited, Bristow Helicopter net operational contract – 47 Group liabilities helicopters and site services) 2001 Western Power Hyder Investments plc - A55 6 John Laing plc Various 92.5 58.5 63.3 Distribution road stakes A130 road M40 road project Dockland Light Railway London Underground Connect project Ministry of Defence headquarters 2003 Amey plc M6, Scotland 8 John Laing plc 19.5 42.9 25.9 45.2 A19 road 50.0 Birmingham & Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust (Erdington & Winson Green) MoD Main Building British Transport Police London Underground Glasgow schools-Project 2002 25.5 Edinburgh schools 30.0 Walsall street lighting 50.0 Mowlem City Greenwich Lewisham Rail 1 Infrastructure 40.0 19.4 16.0 73.3 Construction Link (Docklands Light Railway) Investors John Laing plc National Physical Laboratory 1 Serco Group plc 50.0 0.8 0.4 21.1 Wackenhut Premier Custodial Group: HMP 4 Serco Group plc 50.0 48.6 35.0 66.8 Corrections Dovegate Prison - now Corporation Inc HMP Ashfield Prison has HMP Lowdham Grange Prison 100% Hassockfield Secure Training Centre John Laing plc A19 road Dishforth to Tyne 1 PFI Investors Ltd 50.0 3.4 No 0.0 Tunnel profit or loss Vinci plc Lloyd George
  • Safestyle UK Plc Annual Report & Accounts 2019 Safestyle UK Plc

    Safestyle UK Plc Annual Report & Accounts 2019 Safestyle UK Plc

    safestyleukplc.co.uk Safestyle UK plc Annual Report & Accounts 2019 Safestyle UK plc Financial Overview Contents Revenue (£m) 2017 158.6 Safestyle UK plc 2018 116.4 -27% Annual Report 2019 2019 126.2 8% The UK’s No.1 for replacement Underlying profit / (loss) before taxation¹ (£m) 2017 15.1 windows and doors³ 2018 (8.7) -158% 01 Welcome page and Financial Overview 2019 (1.5) 83% Strategic Report Reported profit / (loss) before taxation (£m) 06 What we do 2017 13.8 20 Chairman’s Statement 22 CEO’s Statement 2018 (16.3) -218% 24 Financial Review 2019 (3.8) 76% 30 Risk Management 36 Corporate Social Responsibility 38 Our People Net cash² (£m) Governance 2017 11.0 2018 0.3 -98% 46 Board of Directors 48 Audit Committee Report 2019 0.4 71% 50 Directors’ Remuneration Report 58 Directors’ Report Average installed order value (£) 61 Independent Auditor’s Report 2017 3,232 Financials 2018 3,319 3% 68 Consolidated Income Statement 2019 3,337 1% 69 Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 70 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 71 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows Average frame price (£) 72 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 2017 608 2018 646 6% 2019 678 5% Frames installed 2017 265,716 2018 184,184 -31% 2019 190,252 3% ¹ See the Financial Review for definition of underlying profit / (loss) before taxation ² See the Financial Review for definition of net cash Annual Report & Accounts 2019 01 ³ Based on Fensa data Safestyle UK plc Highly Recommended All figures from February 2020 Safestyle UK leading the way in customer reviews
  • UK Jubilee Line Extension (JLE)

    UK Jubilee Line Extension (JLE)

    UK Jubilee Line Extension (JLE) - 1 - This report was compiled by the OMEGA Centre, University College London. Please Note: This Project Profile has been prepared as part of the ongoing OMEGA Centre of Excellence work on Mega Urban Transport Projects. The information presented in the Profile is essentially a 'work in progress' and will be updated/amended as necessary as work proceeds. Readers are therefore advised to periodically check for any updates or revisions. The Centre and its collaborators/partners have obtained data from sources believed to be reliable and have made every reasonable effort to ensure its accuracy. However, the Centre and its collaborators/partners cannot assume responsibility for errors and omissions in the data nor in the documentation accompanying them. - 2 - CONTENTS A INTRODUCTION Type of Project Location Major Associated Developments Current Status B BACKGROUND TO PROJECT Principal Project Objectives Key Enabling Mechanisms and Timeline of Key Decisions Principal Organisations Involved • Central Government Bodies/Departments • Local Government • London Underground Limited • Olympia & York • The coordinating group • Contractors Planning and Environmental Regime • The JLE Planning Regime • The Environmental Statement • Project Environmental Policy & the Environmental Management System (EMS) • Archaeological Impact Assessment • Public Consultation • Ecological Mitigation • Regeneration Land Acquisition C PRINCIPAL PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS Route Description Main Termini and Intermediate Stations • Westminster