DOCSLIB.ORG

Washington's 2015 Big Game Hunting Seasons & Regulations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Washington's 2015 Big Game Hunting Seasons & Regulations Washington’s 2015 Big Game Hunting Seasons & Regulations Effective April 1, 2015 - March 31, 2016 Photo by Joe Lind May 20, 2015 Special Permit Application Deadline: 2015 BIG GAME SEASONS AND REGULATIONS PAMPHLET CORRECTIONS AS OF DEC. 2, 2015 Page 6 (added Oct. 28) The definition for Military Personnel incorrectly states that dependents must establish a 90-day residency. Dependents do not have to establish this 90-day requirement. Page 19 (added May 5) Under the High Buck Hunts, the page number for the U.S. Forest Service maps should be 99. Page 21 (added May 5) Under the High Buck Hunts, the page number for the U.S. Forest Service maps should be 99. Page 32 (added May 14) Hunt choices 1530 – 1540 (GMUs 411-417, 419-422) within the Youth Deer category are supposed to also be for a Second Deer tag. Since these hunts were placed in the wrong category, selected applicants have the choice to either purchase a second deer tag and participate in the hunt, or return the permit and have their points restored within the Youth Deer category. Page 33 (added May 14) Hunt choices 1573 – 1583 (GMUs 411-417, 419-422) within the Youth Deer category are supposed to also be for a Second Deer tag. Since these hunts were placed in the wrong category, selected applicants have the choice to either purchase a second deer tag and participate in the hunt, or return the permit and have their points restored within the Youth Deer category. Page 35 (added May 14) Hunt choices 1621 – 1631 (GMUs 411-417, 419-422) within the Deer Hunters 65 and Over category are supposed to also be for a Second Deer tag. Since these hunts were placed in the wrong category, selected applicants have the choice to either purchase a second deer tag and participate in the hunt, or return the permit and have their points restored within the Deer Hunters 65 and Over category. Page 36 (added May 14) Hunt choices 1655 – 1667 (GMUs 411-417, 419-422) within the Deer Hunters 65 and Over category are supposed to also be for a Second Deer tag. Since these hunts were placed in the wrong category, selected applicants have the choice to either purchase a second deer tag and participate in the hunt, or return the permit and have their points restored within the Deer Hunters 65 and Over category. Page 38 (added May 14) Hunt choices 1754 – 1764 (GMUs 411-417, 419-422) within the Deer Hunters with Disabilities category are supposed to also be for a Second Deer tag. Since these hunts were placed in the wrong category, selected applicants have the choice to either purchase a second deer tag and participate in the hunt, or return the permit and have their points restored within the Deer Hunters with Disabilities category. Page 38 (added May 14) The Deer Hunters with Disabilities hunt choice, 1760 – Cypress, will not be included in the special permit drawing because it does not provide adequate access to hunters with disabilities. Page 39 (added May 14) Hunt choices 1776 – 1786 (GMUs 411-417, 419-422) within the Deer Hunters with Disabilities category are supposed to also be for a Second Deer tag. Since these hunts were placed in the wrong category, selected applicants have the choice to either purchase a second deer tag and participate in the hunt, or return the permit and have their points restored within the Deer Hunters with Disabilities category. Page 39 (added May 14) The Deer Hunters with Disabilities hunt choice, 1782 - Cypress, will not be included in the special permit drawing because it does not provide adequate access to hunters with disabilities. Page 41 (added June 22) Deer hunt note “F” incorrectly states that the hunter needs to contact the USAF Survival School. This is not accurate. The USAF Survival School will contact hunters drawn for this area. Page 50 (added April 17) The elk eastern Washington modern firearm season, Oct. 31 – Nov. 15, should include GMUs 284, 290. Page 60 (added April 30) Hunt choice 2424, Nooksack, should have hunt note “H” added, which states hunters must wear hunter orange. Page 61 (added April 30) Hunt choice 2516, Nooksack, should have hunt note “H” added, which states hunters must wear hunter orange. Page 62 (added April 29) Hunt choices 2609 – 2612, and 2617 should have hunt note “H” added, which states hunters must wear hunter orange. Page 67 (added December 2) The state of Michigan has been added to the list of states where Washington requires additional and specific processing of deer, elk, and moose carcasses before those harvested animals can be brought into the state. An emergency rule has been filed to include Michigan because chronic wasting disease (CWD) was detected in a wild, free-ranging deer after Washington’s hunting rules were adopted and the hunting regulations were published. Page 84 (added April 30) Bail forfeiture (payment of a fine on a citation) will not count towards a suspension. The pamphlet incorrectly states that the law treats bail forfeiture as a conviction that will be counted. Page 84 (added October 28) Under the “Firearm Laws” section, RCW 9.41.170 is incorrect. The pertaining RCWs are: 9.41.040, 9.41.173, and 9.41.175 Page 96 (added April 28) The landowner access fee programs are known to impact access to areas in the following GMUs: 418, 437, 448, 501, 506, 520, 524, 550, 556, 564, 568, 574, 578, 602, 603, 612, 615, 638, 642, 648, 651,653, 654, 658, 660, 667, 672, 673, and 681. Page 103 (added August 31) In the second line of the area description for Elk Area 5066 Norway Pass, USFS Trail 320 should actually be listed as USFS Trail 230. (The trail is referenced twice in the description, but the first reference is not correct.) 2015 Washington State Big Game Hunting Pamphlet Table of Contents INFORMATION General Information Deer Seasons and Permits GENERAL Department of Fish and Wildlife Offices 3 Hunting Requirements and General Definitions 18 License Fees and Requirements 4-5 Modern Firearm General 19 Age Requirements 5 Archery General 20 Hunter Orange 5 Muzzleloader General 21 Definitions 6 Deer Special Permits 22-41 Mandatory Hunter Reporting 7 Elk Seasons and Permits DEER Multiple Season Permits 8 Raffle Permit Hunts 10-11 Elk Tag Areas 48 Special Hunting Season Permit Application Instructions 12-13 General Information and Definitions 49 Special Hunting Permit Category Table 14 Modern Firearm General 50 Disease 66-67 Archery General 51 Reporting Violations 81 Muzzleloader General 52 ELK Hunting Hours 83 Elk Special Permits 53-64 Violations and Penalties 84 Cougar Equipment and Hunting Methods 85-86 Tribal Hunting 86 General Season 68 Prohibited Hunting Methods 87 Harvest Guideline System 68 COUGAR Tagging and Transporting 88 Hide Sealing Requirements 68 Hunting Access and Closures 89 Black Bear Firearm Restriction Areas 90 Public Conduct Rules for WDFW Lands 91 Black Bear General Seasons 69 Persons with Disabilities 91 Spring Black Bear Special Permits 70 BEAR BLACK Hunter’s Code of Conduct 92 Goat, Moose, Bighorn Sheep Vehicle Access Pass/Discover Pass 5, 92 Hunter Education 94 Moose Special Permits 71-72 Cooperative Road Management Areas 95 Mountain Goat Special Permits 74 WDFW Private Lands Program 96 Bighorn Sheep Permits 76-77 BIGHORN SHEEP BIGHORN GOAT, MOOSE, GOAT, Maps Other Seasons Deer Areas 42-43 Bobcat, Coyote, Fox, Grouse, Crow 79 Game Management Units (Western) 44 Raccoon, Rabbit and Hare 79 Game Management Units (Eastern) 45 Wild Turkey General Seasons and Special Permits 80 Elk Areas 46-47 Moose Areas 73 Significant changes are red. & SMALL GAME Mountain Goat Areas 75 TURKEY Bighorn Sheep Units 78 Noteworthy information is blue. Other Map Sources 99 Legal Descriptions WAC Summary Information This pamphlet is a summary of the hunting regulations and seasons adopted by Moose Areas 100 the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission This pamphlet does not contain DESCRIPTIONS Bighorn Sheep Units 100 nor is it intended to contain all Department regulations Regulations specific to Mountain Goat Areas 100-101 the hunting seasons described in this pamphlet are found in Sections 232-28-248 AREA Elk Areas 101-103 through 232-28-516, and 232-12-001 through 232-12-840, of the Washington Deer Areas 103-104 Administrative Code Game Management Units 104-117 This program receives Federal assistance from the U S Fish and Wildlife Service Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, the U S Department of the Interior and its bureaus prohibit discrimination on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability and sex (in educational programs) If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity or facility, please contact the WDFW ADA Program Manager at P O Box 43139, Olympia WA 98504 or write to: U S Fish and Wildlife Service, Chief, Public Civil Rights Division, Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20240 1 Report your hunting activity by Jan. 31, 2016 for Big Game & Turkey by calling toll-free at 1-877-945-3492 or going online at wdfw.wa.gov/hunting. 2015 Washington State Big Game Hunting Pamphlet Message from WDFW Hunters shape new • More antlerless whitetail hunting in northeast: Antlerless deer opportunities in opportunities in the field northeastern Washington were dramatically reduced in recent years by the effects of Welcome to another year of big game hunting some hard winters Many of those hunting in Washington Both of us are new to our opportunities are being
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report
    RECONNAISSANCE SURFICIAL GEOLOGIC MAPPING OF THE LATE CENOZOIC SEDIMENTS OF THE COLUMBIA BASIN, WASHINGTON by James G. Rigby and Kurt Othberg with contributions from Newell Campbell Larry Hanson Eugene Kiver Dale Stradling Gary Webster Open File Report 79-3 September 1979 State of Washington Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources Olympia, Washington CONTENTS Introduction Objectives Study Area Regional Setting 1 Mapping Procedure 4 Sample Collection 8 Description of Map Units 8 Pre-Miocene Rocks 8 Columbia River Basalt, Yakima Basalt Subgroup 9 Ellensburg Formation 9 Gravels of the Ancestral Columbia River 13 Ringold Formation 15 Thorp Gravel 17 Gravel of Terrace Remnants 19 Tieton Andesite 23 Palouse Formation and Other Loess Deposits 23 Glacial Deposits 25 Catastrophic Flood Deposits 28 Background and previous work 30 Description and interpretation of flood deposits 35 Distinctive geomorphic features 38 Terraces and other features of undetermined origin 40 Post-Pleistocene Deposits 43 Landslide Deposits 44 Alluvium 45 Alluvial Fan Deposits 45 Older Alluvial Fan Deposits 45 Colluvium 46 Sand Dunes 46 Mirna Mounds and Other Periglacial(?) Patterned Ground 47 Structural Geology 48 Southwest Quadrant 48 Toppenish Ridge 49 Ah tanum Ridge 52 Horse Heaven Hills 52 East Selah Fault 53 Northern Saddle Mountains and Smyrna Bench 54 Selah Butte Area 57 Miscellaneous Areas 58 Northwest Quadrant 58 Kittitas Valley 58 Beebe Terrace Disturbance 59 Winesap Lineament 60 Northeast Quadrant 60 Southeast Quadrant 61 Recommendations 62 Stratigraphy 62 Structure 63 Summary 64 References Cited 66 Appendix A - Tephrochronology and identification of collected datable materials 82 Appendix B - Description of field mapping units 88 Northeast Quadrant 89 Northwest Quadrant 90 Southwest Quadrant 91 Southeast Quadrant 92 ii ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodically Spaced Anticlines of the Columbia Plateau
    Geological Society of America Special Paper 239 1989 Periodically spaced anticlines of the Columbia Plateau Thomas R. Watters Center for Earth and Planetary Studies, National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. 20560 ABSTRACT Deformation of the continental flood-basalt in the westernmost portion of the Columbia Plateau has resulted in regularly spaced anticlinal ridges. The periodic nature of the anticlines is characterized by dividing the Yakima fold belt into three domains on the basis of spacings and orientations: (1) the northern domain, made up of the eastern segments of Umtanum Ridge, the Saddle Mountains, and the Frenchman Hills; (2) the central domain, made up of segments of Rattlesnake Ridge, the eastern segments of Horse Heaven Hills, Yakima Ridge, the western segments of Umtanum Ridge, Cleman Mountain, Bethel Ridge, and Manastash Ridge; and (3) the southern domain, made up of Gordon Ridge, the Columbia Hills, the western segment of Horse Heaven Hills, Toppenish Ridge, and Ahtanum Ridge. The northern, central, and southern domains have mean spacings of 19.6,11.6, and 27.6 km, respectively, with a total range of 4 to 36 km and a mean of 20.4 km (n = 203). The basalts are modeled as a multilayer of thin linear elastic plates with frictionless contacts, resting on a mechanically weak elastic substrate of finite thickness, that has buckled at a critical wavelength of folding. Free slip between layers is assumed, based on the presence of thin sedimentary interbeds in the Grande Ronde Basalt separating groups of flows with an average thickness of roughly 280 m.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Regions of Washington
    What are the Major Geographic Regions of Washington? Geographic Regions of Washington Okanogan Highlands Puget Basin Columbia Plateau The Rivers of WA & the 5 Geographic Regions Okanogan Highlands Columbia Puget Basin Plateau Direction of flow for WA rivers? Direction of flow for WA the rivers: Okanogan Highlands Puget Basin Columbia Plateau Where does the water end up? All water in WA eventually makes it into the Pacific, but there are 5 main drainage points in WA. The 5 Drainage Points Puget Columbia Pacific Ocean Pacific Sound River Snake River Columbia River Describe: 5 Drainage Points of Washington 1. Snake River -drains rivers in SE WA before it empties into Columbia 2. Columbia River -drains rivers E of Cascades and in S WA, and flows to the Pacific 3. Pacific Ocean - drains rivers W of Coast Range 4. Strait of Juan de Fuca – drains rivers N of Coast Range 5. Puget Sound - drains rivers E of Coast Range & W of Cascade Crest Where does the water end up? Puget Columbia Pacific Ocean Pacific Sound River Snake River Columbia River 5 Regions Descriptions Okanogan Highlands • Forested hills, grassy lowlands – Dry, inland forest. • Climate: Moderately hot, dry summers; cold winters with measurable snowfall • Elevation: 1,000‘ – 6,000’. – Cities: Spokane, Okanogan, Colville – Rivers: Okanogan, Kettle River, Okanogan Spokane, Pend Oreille, Highlands Upper Columbia Okanogan Highlands Okanogan Highlands Columbia Plateau • Semi-desert – Shrub & grasslands. Trees along some stretches of local rivers • Climate: Hot, dry summers; cold winters with occasional snowfall. – Rivers: Columbia, Snake, Yakima, Wenatchee, Palouse – Cities: Yakima, Wenatchee, Tri-Cities, Moses Lake, Ephrata – Hanford Nuclear Reservation Columbia Plateau Columbia Plateau Columbia Plateau Coast Range Olympic Mtns Black Hills Willapa Hills Coast Range • Olympic Mountains, Black Hills, & Willapa Hills – Rain forest on western side of range.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic History of Siletzia, a Large Igneous Province in the Oregon And
    Geologic history of Siletzia, a large igneous province in the Oregon and Washington Coast Range: Correlation to the geomagnetic polarity time scale and implications for a long-lived Yellowstone hotspot Wells, R., Bukry, D., Friedman, R., Pyle, D., Duncan, R., Haeussler, P., & Wooden, J. (2014). Geologic history of Siletzia, a large igneous province in the Oregon and Washington Coast Range: Correlation to the geomagnetic polarity time scale and implications for a long-lived Yellowstone hotspot. Geosphere, 10 (4), 692-719. doi:10.1130/GES01018.1 10.1130/GES01018.1 Geological Society of America Version of Record http://cdss.library.oregonstate.edu/sa-termsofuse Downloaded from geosphere.gsapubs.org on September 10, 2014 Geologic history of Siletzia, a large igneous province in the Oregon and Washington Coast Range: Correlation to the geomagnetic polarity time scale and implications for a long-lived Yellowstone hotspot Ray Wells1, David Bukry1, Richard Friedman2, Doug Pyle3, Robert Duncan4, Peter Haeussler5, and Joe Wooden6 1U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefi eld Road, Menlo Park, California 94025-3561, USA 2Pacifi c Centre for Isotopic and Geochemical Research, Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, 6339 Stores Road, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada 3Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1680 East West Road, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA 4College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, 104 CEOAS Administration Building, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-5503, USA 5U.S. Geological Survey, 4210 University Drive, Anchorage, Alaska 99508-4626, USA 6School of Earth Sciences, Stanford University, 397 Panama Mall Mitchell Building 101, Stanford, California 94305-2210, USA ABSTRACT frames, the Yellowstone hotspot (YHS) is on southern Vancouver Island (Canada) to Rose- or near an inferred northeast-striking Kula- burg, Oregon (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • A G~Ographic Dictionary of Washington
    ' ' ., • I ,•,, ... I II•''• -. .. ' . '' . ... .; - . .II. • ~ ~ ,..,..\f •• ... • - WASHINGTON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY HENRY LANDES, State Geologist BULLETIN No. 17 A G~ographic Dictionary of Washington By HENRY LANDES OLYMPIA FRAN K M, LAMBORN ~PUBLIC PRINTER 1917 BOARD OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. Governor ERNEST LISTER, Chairman. Lieutenant Governor Louis F. HART. State Treasurer W.W. SHERMAN, Secretary. President HENRY SuzzALLO. President ERNEST 0. HOLLAND. HENRY LANDES, State Geologist. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. Go,:ernor Ernest Lister, Chairman, and Members of the Board of Geological Survey: GENTLEMEN : I have the honor to submit herewith a report entitled "A Geographic Dictionary of Washington," with the recommendation that it be printed as Bulletin No. 17 of the Sun-ey reports. Very respectfully, HENRY LAKDES, State Geologist. University Station, Seattle, December 1, 1917. TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page CHAPTER I. GENERAL INFORMATION............................. 7 I Location and Area................................... .. ... .. 7 Topography ... .... : . 8 Olympic Mountains . 8 Willapa Hills . • . 9 Puget Sound Basin. 10 Cascade Mountains . 11 Okanogan Highlands ................................ : ....' . 13 Columbia Plateau . 13 Blue Mountains ..................................... , . 15 Selkirk Mountains ......... : . : ... : .. : . 15 Clhnate . 16 Temperature ......... .' . .. 16 Rainfall . 19 United States Weather Bureau Stations....................... 38 Drainage . 38 Stream Gaging Stations. 42 Gradient of Columbia River. 44 Summary of Discharge
    [Show full text]
  • Petrogenesis of Siletzia: the World’S Youngest Oceanic Plateau
    Results in Geochemistry 1 (2020) 100004 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Results in Geochemistry journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ringeo Petrogenesis of Siletzia: The world’s youngest oceanic plateau T.Jake R. Ciborowski a,∗, Bethan A. Phillips b,1, Andrew C. Kerr b, Dan N. Barfod c, Darren F. Mark c a School of Environment and Technology, University of Brighton, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UK b School of Earth and Ocean Science, Cardiff University, Main Building, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK c Natural Environment Research Council Argon Isotope Facility, Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, East Kilbride G75 0QF, UK a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Keywords: Siletzia is an accreted Palaeocene-Eocene Large Igneous Province, preserved in the northwest United States and Igneous petrology southern Vancouver Island. Although previous workers have suggested that components of Siletzia were formed Geochemistry in tectonic settings including back arc basins, island arcs and ocean islands, more recent work has presented Geochemical modelling evidence for parts of Siletzia to have formed in response to partial melting of a mantle plume. In this paper, we Mantle plumes integrate geochemical and geochronological data to investigate the petrogenetic evolution of the province. Oceanic plateau Large igneous provinces The major element geochemistry of the Siletzia lava flows is used to determine the compositions of the primary magmas of the province, as well as the conditions of mantle melting. These primary magmas are compositionally similar to modern Ocean Island and Mid-Ocean Ridge lavas. Geochemical modelling of these magmas indicates they predominantly evolved through fractional crystallisation of olivine, pyroxenes, plagioclase, spinel and ap- atite in shallow magma chambers, and experienced limited interaction with crustal components.
    [Show full text]
  • Splay-Fault Origin for the Yakima Fold-And-Thrust Belt, Washington State 2 3 Thomas L
    1 Splay-fault origin for the Yakima fold-and-thrust belt, Washington State 2 3 Thomas L. Pratt, United States Geological Survey, School of Oceanography, Box 357940, 4 University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98115 5 6 ABSTRACT 7 The Yakima fold-and-thrust belt (YFTB) is a set of anticlines above reverse faults in the 8 Miocene Columbia River Basalt (CRB) flows of Washington State. The YFTB is bisected by the 9 ~1100-km-long Olympic-Wallowa geomorphic lineament (OWL). There is considerable debate 10 about the origin and earthquake potential of the YFTB and OWL, which lie near six major dams 11 and a large nuclear waste storage site. Here I show that the trends of the YFTB anticlines relative 12 to the OWL match remarkably well the trends of the principal stresses determined from Linear 13 Elastic Fracture Mechanics (LEFM) modeling of the end of a vertical strike-slip fault. From this 14 comparison and the termination of some YFTB anticlines at the OWL, I argue that the YFTB 15 formed as splay faults caused by an abrupt decrease in the amount of strike-slip motion along the 16 OWL. If this hypothesis is correct, the OWL and YFTB are likely interconnected, deeply-rooted 17 structures capable of large earthquakes. 18 19 20 INTRODUCTION 21 The Yakima fold and thrust belt (YFTB) of central Washington State is a set of 22 prominent anticlines in the Miocene Columbia River Basalt flows (CRB; figure 1). The YFTB 23 anticlines form three distinct sets (Riedel et al., 1989 and 1994; Watters, 1989).
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Game Status and Trend Report
    STATE OF WASHINGTON 2017 Game Status and Trend Report AN OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON 2017 GAME STATUS AND TREND REPORT July 1, 2016 – June 30, 2017 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 600 Capitol Way North Olympia, WA 98501-1091 STATE OF WASHINGTON Jay Inslee Governor WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Dr. Jim Unsworth Director WILDLIFE PROGRAM Eric Gardner Assistant Director GAME DIVISION Anis Aoude Game Division Manager This Program Receives Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration, Project W-96-R, Statewide Wildlife Management. This report should be cited as: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2017. 2017 Game status and trend report. Wildlife Program, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington, USA. TABLE OF CONTENTS Deer .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Blue Mountains Mule Deer Management Zone ....................................................................... 2 Columbia Plateau Mule Deer Management Zone ................................................................... 6 East Columbia Gorge Mule Deer Management Zone ............................................................13 East Slope Cascades Mule Deer Management Zone ..............................................................17 Naches Mule Deer Management Zone ................................................................................... 22 Northern Rocky Mountains Mule Deer Management Zone
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS NORTH AMERICA 4 OREGON..........................................................................................64 CHILE..........................................................................................85 ARIZONA..........................................................................................4 CHARDONNAY..........................................................................................64 CABERNET..........................................................................................85 OTHER RED VARIETAL..........................................................................................4 OTHER WINE..........................................................................................65 CHARDONNAY..........................................................................................86 CALIFORNIA..........................................................................................4 PINOT GRIGIO..........................................................................................65 FORTIFIED..........................................................................................87 CABERNET..........................................................................................4 PINOT NOIR..........................................................................................66 MALBEC..........................................................................................87 CHARDONNAY..........................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Geographies of Empty Spaces on Print and Digital Reference Maps: a Study of Washington State
    Central Washington University ScholarWorks@CWU Geography Faculty Scholarship College of the Sciences 5-15-2020 Geographies of Empty Spaces on Print and Digital Reference Maps: A Study of Washington State Sterling Quinn Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/geography Part of the Human Geography Commons DOI: 10.14714/CP95.1591 PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE Geographies of Empty Spaces on Print and Digital Reference Maps: A Study of Washington State Sterling Quinn Central Washington University [email protected] J. B. Harley’s insistence that “there is no such thing as an empty space on a map” invites critical inquiry into which places are being left blank in popular reference maps, and why. I discuss the myriad reasons that items may not appear on a map, and invite a rethinking of the way selection is conceptualized in cartographic education. In this study, several GIS- supported methods are used to identify and compare consistently empty areas in print and digital maps of Washington State made by Google, Microsoft, OpenStreetMap, Rand McNally, National Geographic, and the state Department of Transportation. I then examine the physical and human landscapes of these places using imagery overlays, queries of land ownership data, and observations from site visits. In the state of Washington, empty spaces on the map are highly con- nected with regional and global economies, and are essential for supporting the needs of urban life such as food, electricity, construction, and waste disposal. City dwellers may not ever see or recognize the intensive land uses occurring in these geographies, whose landowners include an intriguing mix of large industries, multiple levels of government, religious colonies, and individuals searching for space and solitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Net Shore-Drift and Artificial Structures Within Grays Harbor, Willapa Bay
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR WWU Graduate School Collection WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship Spring 1995 Net Shore-Drift nda Artificial Structures within Grays Harbor, Willapa Bay, and Mouth of the Columbia River, Washington B. Patrice (Berenthine Patrice) Thomas Western Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Thomas, B. Patrice (Berenthine Patrice), "Net Shore-Drift nda Artificial Structures within Grays Harbor, Willapa Bay, and Mouth of the Columbia River, Washington" (1995). WWU Graduate School Collection. 812. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet/812 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in WWU Graduate School Collection by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WWU LIBRARIES NET SHORE-DRIFT AND ARTIFICIAL STRUCTURES WITHIN GRAYS HARBOR, WILLAPA BAY, AND MOUTH OF THE COLUMBIA RIVER, WASHINGTON by B. Patrice Thomas Accepted in Partial Completion of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Dean of Graduate School Advisory Committee Chair, Dr. Christopher A. Suczek Director, Dr. Maurice L. Schwartz Member, Dr. Thomas A. Terich MASTER’S THESIS In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master’s degree at Western Washington University, I agree that the Library shall make its copies freely available for inspection. I further agree that extensive copying of this thesis is allowable only forscholarly purposes. It is understood, however, that any copying or publication of this thesis for commercial purposes, or for financial gain, shall not be allowed without my written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.22.19 Agenda Packet
    AGENDA Board of Directors Meeting Fort Worden Public Development Authority (FWPDA) Wednesday, May 22, 2019 | 9:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. Commons Building 210, Room A, Fort Worden Regular Board Meeting I. Call to Order II. Roll Call & Staff Introductions ❖ Donald Cobb Jr, Executive Chef ❖ John Coltharp, Catering Manager III. Community Partnership Presentation: Port Townsend Pétanque Alliance IV. Changes to the Agenda V. Public Comment VI. Correspondence ❖ Partners Report ❖ April 16, 2019 Executive Committee Minutes ❖ Cash Flow Report ❖ April 24, 2019 email from David Thielk to Board of Directors VII. Consent Agenda A. Review and Approval of Regular Board Meeting Minutes, April 24, 2019 Action: Motion to approve April 24, 2019 Board Meeting Minutes VIII. Review and Discussion of Financials A. Staff Report B. Board Discussion IX. Makers Square Construction Contract Award A. Staff Report B. Board Discussion Action: Move to approve Resolution 19-10 authorizing the Executive Director to execute a construction contract with Clark Construction, the approved lowest responsive, responsible bidder, for the Makers Square project, and to sign all necessary documents for the project. Page 1 of 67 X. Website Upgrades A. Staff Report B. Board Discussion Action: Move to approve Resolution 19-11 authorizing the Executive Director to enter into a service agreement not to exceed $25,000 with Flying Crow to refresh FWPDA’s website. XI. Staff Report A. State Parks Capital Budget B. Current Projects & Major Repairs C. Glamping Update D. Marketing and Sales Report E. Chetzemoka Interpretive Trail F. 4th of July G. Neighborhood Advisory Committee H. Incident Command Training XII.
    [Show full text]