DOCSLIB.ORG

Improved Knowledge of Biota and Habitats

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Improved Knowledge of Biota and Habitats Improved knowledge of Torres Strait seabed biota and reef habitats Marine and Atmospheric Research M.D.E. Haywood, M. Browne, T. D. Skewes, W.A. Rochester, I.M. McLeod, C.R. Pitcher, D.M. Dennis, J.R. Dunn, S.J. Cheers, T.J. Wassenberg Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility Project 1.3.1 Improved knowledge of Torres Strait seabed biota and reef habitats M.D.E. Haywood, M. Browne, T.D. Skewes, W.A. Rochester, I.M. McLeod, C.R. Pitcher, D.M. Dennis, J.R. Dunn, S.J. Cheers, T.J. Wassenberg. CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility Project 1.3.1 © James Cook University and The University of Queensland. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry: Author: Haywood, M.D.E (Michael Donald Edmund) 1958- Title: Improved knowledge of Torres Strait seabed biota and reef habitats / authors, M.D.E. Haywood [et al.]. Edition: 1st ed. Publisher: Cleveland, Qld. : CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, 2007. ISBN: 9781921424014 (pbk.) 9781921424038 (CD-ROM) 9781921424021 (pdf) Notes: Bibliography. Subjects: Marine ecology--Torres Strait. Marine biodiversity--Torres Strait. Reefs--Torres Strait--Environmental aspects. Torres Strait--Environmental aspects. Other Authors: CSIRO. Marine and Atmospheric Research. Dewey Number: 577.7476 This report should be cited as: Haywood, M.D.E., Browne, M., Skewes, T., Rochester, W., McLeod, I., Pitcher, R., Dennis, D., Dunn, J., Cheers, S., Wassenberg, T. (2007) Improved knowledge of Torres Strait seabed biota and reef habitats. Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility, Cairns (96pp.). Published through the Australian Government’s Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility. The Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility (MTSRF) is part of the Australian Government’s Commonwealth Environment Research Facilities programme. The MTSRF is represented in North Queensland by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited (RRRC). The aim of the MTSRF is to ensure the health of North Queensland’s public environmental assets – particularly the Great Barrier Reef and its catchments, tropical rainforests including the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area, and the Torres Strait – through the generation and transfer of world class research and knowledge sharing. This publication is copyright. The Copyright Act 1968 permits fair dealing for study, research, information or educational purposes subject to inclusion of a sufficient acknowledgement of the source. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment and Water Resources. While reasonable effort has been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. This report is available for download from the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited website: http://www.rrrc.org.au/publications/ February 2007 Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility Technical Report No. 1 Contents CONTENTS....................................................................................................................................I LIST OF FIGURES.......................................................................................................................III LIST OF TABLES .........................................................................................................................V 1. ACRONYMS USED IN THIS REPORT ............................................................................VII 2. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................................................VIII 3. SUMMARY..........................................................................................................................1 4. BACKGROUND..................................................................................................................2 5. INTER-REEFAL SEABED MAPPING................................................................................2 5.1. Introduction................................................................................................ 2 5.2. Methodology .............................................................................................. 3 5.2.1. Inter-reefal seabed mapping.......................................................... 3 5.2.1.1. Sampling design........................................................................3 5.2.2. Field sampling................................................................................ 4 5.2.2.1. Vessel description .....................................................................4 5.2.2.2. Towed Video Camera ...............................................................5 5.2.2.3. Tasks, Events and Navigation Data Logging............................6 5.2.3. Video data processing ................................................................... 7 5.2.4. Data analysis ................................................................................. 9 5.2.4.1. Physical co-variate data............................................................9 5.2.5. Accounting for aggregation / dispersion....................................... 11 5.2.6. Random forests............................................................................ 12 5.2.7. Transformation in non-parametric estimation .............................. 13 5.3. Results and Discussion .......................................................................... 14 5.3.1. Estimation of spatial distribution of counts................................... 14 5.3.2. Estimation of spatial distribution of cover types........................... 23 5.3.3. Comparison of video biota with that from sled and trawl ............. 27 6. CORAL REEF CHARACTERISATION ............................................................................35 6.1. Introduction.............................................................................................. 35 6.2. Methodology ............................................................................................ 36 6.2.1. Basemap...................................................................................... 36 6.2.2. Reef datasets............................................................................... 36 6.2.3. Survey methods........................................................................... 37 6.2.4. Sample design ............................................................................. 38 6.2.5. Field sampling.............................................................................. 38 6.2.6. Cluster analysis............................................................................ 40 6.2.6.1. Analysis datasets ....................................................................40 i Improved knowledge of biota and habitats 6.2.6.2. Species and habitat clustering ................................................41 6.2.6.3. Habitat-forming species and environmental factors................41 6.2.6.4. Fishes and environmental factors ...........................................42 6.2.7. Gap analysis ................................................................................ 43 6.3. Results...................................................................................................... 43 6.3.1. Physical covariate datasets ......................................................... 43 6.3.2. Maps of survey data..................................................................... 52 6.3.2.1. Substrate maps .......................................................................52 6.3.2.2. Coral growth forms..................................................................60 6.3.2.3. Reef fish distribution................................................................69 6.3.2.4. Holothurian distribution ...........................................................71 6.3.2.5. Seagrass distribution...............................................................73 6.3.3. Clustering the maximum number of samples (a) ......................... 74 6.3.4. Clustering by the maximum number of species (b)...................... 76 6.3.5. Clustering by habitat-forming species (c)..................................... 80 6.3.6. Clustering by habitat attributes (d)............................................... 82 6.3.7. Association between clusters from different analyses ................. 83 6.3.8. Habitat-forming species and fetch ............................................... 84 6.3.9. Habitat-forming species and environmental factors..................... 85 6.3.10. Fishes and environmental factors................................................ 87 6.3.11. Gap Analysis................................................................................ 89 6.4. Discussion................................................................................................ 90 6.4.1. Clustering..................................................................................... 90 6.4.2. Threats......................................................................................... 92 6.4.3. Gap analysis ................................................................................ 92 6.4.4. Identification of areas for future work..........................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Zootaxa, Dupliciporia Lanterna N. Sp. (Digenea: Zoogonidae)
    Zootaxa 1707: 60–68 (2008) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2008 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Dupliciporia lanterna n. sp. (Digenea: Zoogonidae) from Priacanthus hamrur (Perciformes: Priacanthidae) and additional zoogonids parasitizing fishes from the waters off New Caledonia RODNEY A. BRAY1 & JEAN-LOU JUSTINE2 1Department of Zoology, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Équipe Biogéographie Marine Tropicale, Unité Systématique, Adaptation, Évolution (CNRS, UPMC, MNHN, IRD), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, BP A5, 98848 Nouméa Cedex, Nouvelle Calédonie. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The genus Dupliciporia is considered valid based on observation of the type species, and is considered the senior syn- onym of Parasteganoderma and Liliaoralis. The new combinations Dupliciporia cephaloporum (Machida & Araki, 1990) and Dupliciporia cataluphi (Korotaeva, 1994) are formed. A new species, Dupliciporia lanterna, is described from the digestive tract of Priacanthus hamrur from the waters off New Caledonia, South Pacific. Dupliciporia lanterna n. sp. differs from its congeners in its elongate body and its rectilinear vitelline fields. Dupliciporia sp. (=Parastegano- derma sp. of El-Labadi et al. [2006]) from Pristigenys niphonia from the Gulf of Aqaba, is briefly described and figured. Other zoogonids reported from New Caledonian waters are Zoogonus pagrosomi from Lethrinus atkinsoni and Lethrinus genivittatus, Parvipyrum
    [Show full text]
  • View/Download
    SPARIFORMES · 1 The ETYFish Project © Christopher Scharpf and Kenneth J. Lazara COMMENTS: v. 4.0 - 13 Feb. 2021 Order SPARIFORMES 3 families · 49 genera · 283 species/subspecies Family LETHRINIDAE Emporerfishes and Large-eye Breams 5 genera · 43 species Subfamily Lethrininae Emporerfishes Lethrinus Cuvier 1829 from lethrinia, ancient Greek name for members of the genus Pagellus (Sparidae) which Cuvier applied to this genus Lethrinus amboinensis Bleeker 1854 -ensis, suffix denoting place: Ambon Island, Molucca Islands, Indonesia, type locality (occurs in eastern Indian Ocean and western Pacific from Indonesia east to Marshall Islands and Samoa, north to Japan, south to Western Australia) Lethrinus atkinsoni Seale 1910 patronym not identified but probably in honor of William Sackston Atkinson (1864-ca. 1925), an illustrator who prepared the plates for a paper published by Seale in 1905 and presumably the plates in this 1910 paper as well Lethrinus atlanticus Valenciennes 1830 Atlantic, the only species of the genus (and family) known to occur in the Atlantic Lethrinus borbonicus Valenciennes 1830 -icus, belonging to: Borbon (or Bourbon), early name for Réunion island, western Mascarenes, type locality (occurs in Red Sea and western Indian Ocean from Persian Gulf and East Africa to Socotra, Seychelles, Madagascar, Réunion, and the Mascarenes) Lethrinus conchyliatus (Smith 1959) clothed in purple, etymology not explained, probably referring to “bright mauve” area at central basal part of pectoral fins on living specimens Lethrinus crocineus
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the Damselfishes (Pomacentridae) and Patterns of Asymmetrical Diversification in Body Size and Feeding Ecology
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.07.430149; this version posted February 8, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Phylogeny of the damselfishes (Pomacentridae) and patterns of asymmetrical diversification in body size and feeding ecology Charlene L. McCord a, W. James Cooper b, Chloe M. Nash c, d & Mark W. Westneat c, d a California State University Dominguez Hills, College of Natural and Behavioral Sciences, 1000 E. Victoria Street, Carson, CA 90747 b Western Washington University, Department of Biology and Program in Marine and Coastal Science, 516 High Street, Bellingham, WA 98225 c University of Chicago, Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, and Committee on Evolutionary Biology, 1027 E. 57th St, Chicago IL, 60637, USA d Field Museum of Natural History, Division of Fishes, 1400 S. Lake Shore Dr., Chicago, IL 60605 Corresponding author: Mark W. Westneat [email protected] Journal: PLoS One Keywords: Pomacentridae, phylogenetics, body size, diversification, evolution, ecotype Abstract The damselfishes (family Pomacentridae) inhabit near-shore communities in tropical and temperature oceans as one of the major lineages with ecological and economic importance for coral reef fish assemblages. Our understanding of their evolutionary ecology, morphology and function has often been advanced by increasingly detailed and accurate molecular phylogenies. Here we present the next stage of multi-locus, molecular phylogenetics for the group based on analysis of 12 nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequences from 330 of the 422 damselfish species.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Trypanorhynch Metacestodes in Teleost Fishes from Coral Reefs Off Eastern Australia and New Caledonia
    Parasite 2014, 21,60 Ó I. Beveridge et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2014 DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2014060 Available online at: www.parasite-journal.org RESEARCH ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS Diversity of trypanorhynch metacestodes in teleost fishes from coral reefs off eastern Australia and New Caledonia Ian Beveridge1,*, Rodney A. Bray2, Thomas H. Cribb3, and Jean-Lou Justine4 1 Veterinary Clinical Centre, University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia 2 Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom 3 School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia 4 ISYEB, Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (UMR7205 CNRS, EPHE, MNHN, UPMC), Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, CP 51, 55 rue Buffon, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France Received 31 August 2014, Accepted 31 October 2014, Published online November 18 2014 Abstract – Trypanorhynch metacestodes were examined from teleosts from coral reefs in eastern Australia and from New Caledonia. From over 12,000 fishes examined, 33 named species of trypanorhynchs were recovered as well as three species of tentacularioids which are described but not named. Host-parasite and parasite-host lists are provided, including more than 100 new host records. Lacistorhynchoid and tentacularioid taxa predominated with fewer otobo- thrioid and gymnorhynchoids. Five species, Callitetrarhynchus gracilis, Floriceps minacanthus, Pseudotobothrium dipsacum, Pseudolacistorhynchus heroniensis and Ps. shipleyi, were particularly common and exhibited low host specificity. Limited data suggested a higher diversity of larval trypanorhynchs in larger piscivorous fish families. Several fish families surveyed extensively (Blenniidae, Chaetodontidae, Gobiidae, Kyphosidae and Scaridae) yielded no trypanorhynch larvae. The overall similarity between the fauna of the Great Barrier Reef and New Caledonia was 45%.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites of Coral Reef Fish: How Much Do We Know? with a Bibliography of Fish Parasites in New Caledonia
    Belg. J. Zool., 140 (Suppl.): 155-190 July 2010 Parasites of coral reef fish: how much do we know? With a bibliography of fish parasites in New Caledonia Jean-Lou Justine (1) UMR 7138 Systématique, Adaptation, Évolution, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 57, rue Cuvier, F-75321 Paris Cedex 05, France (2) Aquarium des lagons, B.P. 8185, 98807 Nouméa, Nouvelle-Calédonie Corresponding author: Jean-Lou Justine; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. A compilation of 107 references dealing with fish parasites in New Caledonia permitted the production of a parasite-host list and a host-parasite list. The lists include Turbellaria, Monopisthocotylea, Polyopisthocotylea, Digenea, Cestoda, Nematoda, Copepoda, Isopoda, Acanthocephala and Hirudinea, with 580 host-parasite combinations, corresponding with more than 370 species of parasites. Protozoa are not included. Platyhelminthes are the major group, with 239 species, including 98 monopisthocotylean monogeneans and 105 digeneans. Copepods include 61 records, and nematodes include 41 records. The list of fish recorded with parasites includes 195 species, in which most (ca. 170 species) are coral reef associated, the rest being a few deep-sea, pelagic or freshwater fishes. The serranids, lethrinids and lutjanids are the most commonly represented fish families. Although a list of published records does not provide a reliable estimate of biodiversity because of the important bias in publications being mainly in the domain of interest of the authors, it provides a basis to compare parasite biodiversity with other localities, and especially with other coral reefs. The present list is probably the most complete published account of parasite biodiversity of coral reef fishes.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices Appendices
    APPENDICES APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 – PUBLICATIONS SCIENTIFIC PAPERS Aidoo EN, Ute Mueller U, Hyndes GA, and Ryan Braccini M. 2015. Is a global quantitative KL. 2016. The effects of measurement uncertainty assessment of shark populations warranted? on spatial characterisation of recreational fishing Fisheries, 40: 492–501. catch rates. Fisheries Research 181: 1–13. Braccini M. 2016. Experts have different Andrews KR, Williams AJ, Fernandez-Silva I, perceptions of the management and conservation Newman SJ, Copus JM, Wakefield CB, Randall JE, status of sharks. Annals of Marine Biology and and Bowen BW. 2016. Phylogeny of deepwater Research 3: 1012. snappers (Genus Etelis) reveals a cryptic species pair in the Indo-Pacific and Pleistocene invasion of Braccini M, Aires-da-Silva A, and Taylor I. 2016. the Atlantic. Molecular Phylogenetics and Incorporating movement in the modelling of shark Evolution 100: 361-371. and ray population dynamics: approaches and management implications. Reviews in Fish Biology Bellchambers LM, Gaughan D, Wise B, Jackson G, and Fisheries 26: 13–24. and Fletcher WJ. 2016. Adopting Marine Stewardship Council certification of Western Caputi N, de Lestang S, Reid C, Hesp A, and How J. Australian fisheries at a jurisdictional level: the 2015. Maximum economic yield of the western benefits and challenges. Fisheries Research 183: rock lobster fishery of Western Australia after 609-616. moving from effort to quota control. Marine Policy, 51: 452-464. Bellchambers LM, Fisher EA, Harry AV, and Travaille KL. 2016. Identifying potential risks for Charles A, Westlund L, Bartley DM, Fletcher WJ, Marine Stewardship Council assessment and Garcia S, Govan H, and Sanders J.
    [Show full text]
  • Ex-Situ Documentation of Ethnobiology
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarSpace at University of Hawai'i at Manoa Vol. 8 (2014), pp. 788–809 http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/ldc http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24626 Ex-situ Documentation of Ethnobiology Francesca Lahe-Deklin Australian National University Aung Si University of Melbourne Migrant speakers of endangered languages living in urban centers in developed coun- tries represent a valuable resource through which these languages may be conveniently documented. Here, we first present a general methodology by which linguists can com- pile a meaningful set of visual (and sometimes audio) stimuli with which to carry out a reasonably detailed ethnobiological elicitation session in an ‘ex-situ’ setting, such as an urban university. We then showcase some preliminary results of such an elicitation carried out on the Dumo, or Vanimo, language of north-western Papua New Guinea during a linguistic field methods course at the Australian National University. With the help of a region-specific set of visual stimuli obtained from various sources, it was possible to document many fascinating aspects of the fish, and other marine-biological, knowledge of Dumo speakers, along with detailed ethnographic notes on the cultural significance of marine creatures. 1. INTRODUCTION. Developed countries such as Australia and the United States of Amer- ica have, in recent decades, become home to numerous ethnic communities of speakers of small, inadequately described or endangered languages (Roberts 2010). The presence of large numbers of such migrants in major urban centers, such as New York, London, or Melbourne, provides exciting opportunities for collaborations between linguists and the speakers of endangered languages, wherein the former document the language of the latter without the great expense of having to travel to a distant, possibly remote, location.
    [Show full text]
  • Pomacentridae): Structural and Expression Variation in Opsin Genes
    Molecular Ecology (2017) 26, 1323–1342 doi: 10.1111/mec.13968 Why UV vision and red vision are important for damselfish (Pomacentridae): structural and expression variation in opsin genes SARA M. STIEB,*† FABIO CORTESI,*† LORENZ SUEESS,* KAREN L. CARLETON,‡ WALTER SALZBURGER† and N. J. MARSHALL* *Sensory Neurobiology Group, Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia, †Zoological Institute, University of Basel, Basel 4051, Switzerland, ‡Department of Biology, The University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA Abstract Coral reefs belong to the most diverse ecosystems on our planet. The diversity in col- oration and lifestyles of coral reef fishes makes them a particularly promising system to study the role of visual communication and adaptation. Here, we investigated the evolution of visual pigment genes (opsins) in damselfish (Pomacentridae) and exam- ined whether structural and expression variation of opsins can be linked to ecology. Using DNA sequence data of a phylogenetically representative set of 31 damselfish species, we show that all but one visual opsin are evolving under positive selection. In addition, selection on opsin tuning sites, including cases of divergent, parallel, conver- gent and reversed evolution, has been strong throughout the radiation of damselfish, emphasizing the importance of visual tuning for this group. The highest functional variation in opsin protein sequences was observed in the short- followed by the long- wavelength end of the visual spectrum. Comparative gene expression analyses of a subset of the same species revealed that with SWS1, RH2B and RH2A always being expressed, damselfish use an overall short-wavelength shifted expression profile. Inter- estingly, not only did all species express SWS1 – a UV-sensitive opsin – and possess UV-transmitting lenses, most species also feature UV-reflective body parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Fishes of Wake Atoll1
    Annotated Checklist ofthe Fishes ofWake Atoll 1 Phillip S. Lobel2 and Lisa Kerr Lobel 3 Abstract: This study documents a total of 321 fishes in 64 families occurring at Wake Atoll, a coral atoll located at 19 0 17' N, 1660 36' E. Ten fishes are listed by genus only and one by family; some of these represent undescribed species. The first published account of the fishes of Wake by Fowler and Ball in 192 5 listed 107 species in 31 families. This paper updates 54 synonyms and corrects 20 misidentifications listed in the earlier account. The most recent published account by Myers in 1999 listed 122 fishes in 33 families. Our field surveys add 143 additional species records and 22 new family records for the atoll. Zoogeo­ graphic analysis indicates that the greatest species overlap of Wake Atoll fishes occurs with the Mariana Islands. Several fish species common at Wake Atoll are on the IUCN Red List or are otherwise of concern for conservation. Fish pop­ ulations at Wake Atoll are protected by virtue of it being a U.S. military base and off limits to commercial fishing. WAKE ATOLL IS an isolated atoll in the cen­ and Strategic Defense Command. Conse­ tral Pacific (19 0 17' N, 1660 36' E): It is ap­ quentially, access has been limited due to the proximately 3 km wide by 6.5 km long and military mission, and as a result the aquatic consists of three islands with a land area of fauna of the atoll has not received thorough 2 approximately 6.5 km • Wake is separated investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Biology of Lethrinus Harak on Guam
    Reproductive biology of Lethrinus harak on Guam Compiled by Brett M Taylor and Jennifer L McIlwan University of Guam Marine Laboratory Technical Report March 2 Reproduction in Lethrinus harak TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 3 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 4 METHODS ................................................................................................. 5 Processing of gonads ...................................................................................................... 5 Maturation and sex reversal ........................................................................................... 6 Reproductive seasonality ................................................................................................ 6 Reproductive development ............................................................................................ 6 RESULTS .................................................................................................... 6 Ovarian stages ................................................................................................................. 7 Seasonal variability ......................................................................................................... 8 Developmental ontogeny ............................................................................................... 8 DISCUSSION ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Prioritization of Key Vulnerable Reef Fish Species for Fiji, for Targeted Research
    National prioritization of key vulnerable reef fish species for Fiji, for targeted research Coral reef fish and invertebrates sold at the Suva market. Photo by: Sangeeta Mangubhai/WCS Introduction The majority of Fiji’s population is coastal and therefore highly reliant on inshore fisheries for their subsistence and local economic needs (Hunt 1999). At least 33 percent of all animal protein consumed in Fiji comes from fish, and subsistence and artisanal fisheries contribute at least US$59.1 million to Fiji’s annual GDP (Gillett 2009). There is growing concerns for the impacts of present day harvesting rates and methods, especially for vulnerable fish and invertebrate species in Fiji. This is resulting in a progressive decline in fish belonging to higher trophic (feeding) groups, a pattern that is termed “fishing down food webs” (Pauly et al. 1998). Coral reef fish vary in their vulnerability to fishing pressure, and how well they can recover, if fishing is stopped or significantly reduced. Recovery potential relates to the rate at which a species can replace the individuals that are lost to natural mortality and to fishing. In general, the medium to larger carnivorous fish high in the food chain are thought to be more vulnerable to fishing (e.g. groupers) requiring in decades to recover, while smaller fish (e.g. herbivores such as rabbitfish) are thought be less vulnerable (Abesamis et al. 2014). Certain life history characteristics of fish species together can be good predictors of vulnerability at the population level to fishing pressure, including: (a) maximum size; (b) body growth rate; (c) lifespan; (d) natural mortality rates; (e) age at maturity; and (f) length at maturity (Abesamis et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marine Biodiversity and Fisheries Catches of the Pitcairn Island Group
    The Marine Biodiversity and Fisheries Catches of the Pitcairn Island Group THE MARINE BIODIVERSITY AND FISHERIES CATCHES OF THE PITCAIRN ISLAND GROUP M.L.D. Palomares, D. Chaitanya, S. Harper, D. Zeller and D. Pauly A report prepared for the Global Ocean Legacy project of the Pew Environment Group by the Sea Around Us Project Fisheries Centre The University of British Columbia 2202 Main Mall Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z4 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Daniel Pauly RECONSTRUCTION OF TOTAL MARINE FISHERIES CATCHES FOR THE PITCAIRN ISLANDS (1950-2009) ...................................................................................... 3 Devraj Chaitanya, Sarah Harper and Dirk Zeller DOCUMENTING THE MARINE BIODIVERSITY OF THE PITCAIRN ISLANDS THROUGH FISHBASE AND SEALIFEBASE ..................................................................................... 10 Maria Lourdes D. Palomares, Patricia M. Sorongon, Marianne Pan, Jennifer C. Espedido, Lealde U. Pacres, Arlene Chon and Ace Amarga APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................................... 23 APPENDIX 1: FAO AND RECONSTRUCTED CATCH DATA ......................................................................................... 23 APPENDIX 2: TOTAL RECONSTRUCTED CATCH BY MAJOR TAXA ............................................................................
    [Show full text]