A History from 1980 to 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A History from 1980 to 2010 The College of Agriculture and Life Sciences: A History from 1980 to 2010 by Roger L. Caldwell, Professor Emeritus College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Tucson, Arizona 85721 The University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences: A History from 1980 to 2010 by Roger L. Caldwell Professor Emeritus June 2011 College of Agriculture and Life Sciences University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 Published by College of Agriculture and Life Sciences University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 Copyright © 2011 Arizona Board of Regents Table of Contents Table of Contents, i List of Figures, iv List of Tables, iv Foreword, v Preface, vi Highlights viii Part 1. Introduction and Historic Context, 1 Chapter 1. Introduction, 2 Chapter 2. Historical Periods of the University and College, 12 Chapter 3. The Transition Years Explored, 15 Part 1. Summary, 17 Part 2. Caretaking, Stabilizing, Refocusing and Sustaining, 18 Chapter 4. Caretaking: Looking for a Dean 1978-1980, 19 Chapter 5. Stabilizing: Adapting to a New Era 1980-1987, 20 Chapter 6. Refocusing: Growing Under New Conditions 1987-1997, 22 Chapter 7. Sustaining: Preparing for an Uncertain Future 1997-2010, 24 Part 2. Summary, 25 Part 3. Organization, Planning and Focus, 26 Chapter 8. College Structure and Management, 27 Chapter 9. Providing Recognition, 30 Chapter 10. Views on New Directions Facing Universities, 32 Chapter 11. Planning and Focus, 38 Chapter 12. Politics, Innovations, and Disruptions, 45 Part 3. Summary, 49 Part 4. History Since 1980 from Various Perspectives, 50 Chapter 13. Perspective of Academic Departments and Schools, 51 Chapter 14. Perspective of Dean’s Office, 91 Chapter 15. Perspective of Academic Programs, 95 Chapter 16. Perspective of Cooperative Extension, 99 i Chapter 17. Perspective of Agricultural Experiment Station, 105 Chapter 18. Perspective of Administrative Services Office, 108 Chapter 19. Perspective of Development and Alumni Office, 112 Chapter 20. Perspective of International Programs, 114 Chapter 21. Perspective of Communications Activities, 118 Part 4. Summary, 124 Part 5. Personal Recollections and Case Histories, 125 Chapter 22. Ten Case Histories of Change, 126 Chapter 23. Developing the Maricopa Agricultural Center, 141 Chapter 24. Recollections of Faculty and Staff, 148 Chapter 25. Excerpts of Oral Histories, 162 Chapter 26. Excerpts From Alumni Newsletter Agri-News, 170 Part 5. Summary, 174 Part 6 Recurring Themes and Change, 175 Chapter 27. Identifying Recurring Themes, 176 Chapter 28. Reacting to Continually Changing Environments, 179 Part 6. Summary, 180 Part 7. Looking Backward and Forward, 181 Chapter 29. Looking Backward 60 Years, 182 Chapter 30. Looking Forward 30 Years, 184 Part 7. Summary, 186 Appendices 187 Appendix A. Key Events at a Glance 1950 – 2000, 188 Appendix B. Arizona Agricultural Trends, 189 Appendix C. University Research Funding Availability, 191 Appendix D. Trends of Societal Change Indicators, 192 Appendix E. Administrative Support Structure and Organization, 196 Appendix F. Units Representing College-wide Programs, 199 Appendix G. Facilities: Campus, Agricultural Centers, Counties, 201 Appendix H. Descriptions of Specialized Units, 204 Appendix I. Listing of Administrative Unit Directors or Heads, 209 Appendix J. Faculty and Staff Honors and Awards Recipients 1980-2010, 217 Appendix K. Endowed Chairs and Their Holders, 227 Appendix L. College Awards to Citizens, 228 ii Appendix M. Key Driving Forces - Clusters of Related Trends, 236 Appendix N. College Programmatic Focus 2010, 237 Appendix O. Overview of Academic Departmental Name Changes 1905-2010, 238 Appendix P. Faculty Memberships in Professional Associations, 239 Appendix Q. Faculty Involved in Preparing Leaders for Tomorrow, 245 Appendix R. Bart Cardon’s Epilogue to First CALS History Report, 248 Acknowledgements, 249 References, 250 Further Reading, 252 First CALS History Book – 1885-1985, 252 Second CALS History, Magazine Format – 1980-2010, 252 References and Footnotes in this Book, 252 Index, 253 iii List of Figures Figure 1 Arizona Population Growth by Decade, 5 Figure 2. Arizona's Growth Rate is Cyclical and Slowing, 5 Figure 3. University of Arizona Bachelor Degree Trends, 6 Figure 4. University of Arizona Graduate Degree Trends, 6 Figure 5. University of Arizona Research Expenditures, 7 Figure 6. Public Laws on Agriculture, 10 Figure 7. Public Laws on Environment, 10 Figure 8. Frequency of "Pollution" in Books 1900-2000, 11 Figure 9. Frequency of "Molecular Biology‖ in Books 1900-2000, 11 Figure 10. CALS Research Expenditures, 107 Figure 11. Arizona Agricultural Trends: Wheat, 189 Figure 12. Arizona Agricultural Trends: Cotton, 189 Figure 13. Arizona Agricultural Trends: Hay, 190 Figure 14. Arizona Agricultural Trends: Milk Cows, 190 Figure 15. Arizona Agricultural Trends: Cattle and Calves, 190 Figure 16. Percent Annual Growth for NSF R&D All Universities, 191 Figure 17. Total R&D Expenditures All Universities, 191 Figure 18. U.S. Public Law Trends for Agriculture, 192 Figure 19. U.S. Public Law Trends for Environment, 192 Figure 20. U.S. Public Law Trends on Public Health, 193 Figure 21. U.S. Public Law Trends for Public Lands and Water Management, 193 Figure 22. Frequency of Pollution in Books 1900-2000, 194 Figure 23. Frequency of Molecular Biology in Books 1900-2000, 194 Figure 24. Frequency of Learning in Books 1900-2000, 195 Figure 25. Frequency of Agriculture in Books 1900-2000, 195 List of Tables Table 1. Representative Arizona Agricultural Yield Improvements, 8 Table 2. Comparison of College Awards to Citizens from 1950 to 2010, 30 Table 3. Award Categories for CALS Faculty and Staff, 31 Table 4. Comparison of Departments and Schools Over a 60 Year Period, 51 iv Foreword I have had the privilege of being involved in education and the evolution of the modern Arizona for many years. While cattle ranching was my initial occupation, I became a part of various groups relating to the future of Arizo- na. I acquired new perspectives, and new friends, from each of these groups, and ended up being the chairman or president of most of them. Examples include the University of Arizona Foundation, the Arizona Board of Re- gents, the Tucson Airport Authority, Tucson Medical Center, the Science Foundation of Arizona, the Southern Arizona Leadership Council, the former Tucson 30, and Arizona Town Hall. Along the way I met Roger and I had also heard about some of his activities through other contacts. I learned that he had broad interests and was a unique faculty member. He has served in a variety of university positions and had a special understanding of how universities function, from the multiple perspectives of the various interest groups on campus. In addition, he was a member of a small group of people that assisted the Arizona Board of Regents in the late 1980s in a study to make all three Arizona universities more competitive, efficient, and with increased quality. He has also served on commissions and committees within Arizona going back to the late 1960s. After retirement he was approached to consider writing a history of the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. I can relate to his variety of interests and knowledge as my own career has covered such a range of expe- riences. Reading this book brought back a lot of memories – most of them pleasurable! There, indeed, has been a lot of change and there will be more change in the future. Learning how we navigated the past changes, and understand- ing why those changes occurred, is an important key to preparing ourselves for the future. This book takes this approach – giving the reader a sense of the past as history but also as a prelude for the future. For those readers who would like to know both the general history of the college, and to some extent the university, as well as the specific history of departments and other aspects of the colleges, this is the book for you. This book is organized in ways that allow the reader to find specific sections of special interest, but it is not just a single history but also a series of histories, each from the perspective of different groups of people and of differ- ent aspects of university life. It reviews how the University of Arizona changed from a primarily teaching institu- tion in the 1950s to a major research university by the 1980s, and how the College of Agricultural and Life Sci- ences had to refocus efforts as societal issues and science-based changes caused the college to modify its focus and approach to teaching, research, and extension activities. It also describes and clarifies the roles of various deans, presents ―recollections‖ of various faculty and staff, and has some case histories of how specific depart- ments or programs changed. The book ends by summarizing recurring themes, reviews the last 60 years, and comments on the relevance of these themes for navigating the next 30 years. This book not only presents the history of the college but lists a good deal of reference material ranging from trend information that impacts the college to lists of awards and administrative leaders for campus departments and schools, agricultural centers, and cooperative extension county offices. For readers that have been involved in the college, I hope this book brings back memories for you as it did for me. For other readers, or future college members in leadership positions, you will find the book a worthy addition to your collection. Fred T. Boice Boice Financial Company Tucson, Arizona May 2011 v Preface The 30-year time period for this book covers a period of rapid change in the College and its audiences. The peri- od included a series of new technologies, financial reductions, new programs and facilities, and reorganizations. It covers the period of two Deans but also provides context based on activities from the previous 30-year period; and it identifies some possibilities for the next 30-year period.
Recommended publications
  • REPORT of the TASK FORCE on the FUTURE of UMASS AMHERST
    REPORT of the TASK FORCE ON THE FUTURE OF UMASS AMHERST October 3, 2001 OUTLINE OF THE UMASS AMHERST TASK FORCE REPORT I. THE CONTEXT OF THE TASK FORCE REPORT II. A BRIEF HISTORY OF UMASS AMHERST III. CLASSIFICATIONS OF INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION • The Carnegie Foundation Classification (1994) • The Carnegie Foundation Classification (2000) • The Association of American Universities (AAU) IV. NATIONAL RATINGS OF UMASS AMHERST • US News and World Report • The National Research Council (NRC) • The Association of American Colleges (AAU) • The “Center” at the University of Florida V. FINANCIAL RESOURCES • A Comparison of Fiscal Resources with Peer Institutions • A Comparison of Fiscal Expenditures with Peer Institutions • Investment Decisions and Opportunities • Opportunities for Enhancing Revenue VI. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1 Part One THE CONTEXT OF THE TASK FORCE REPORT The decade of the nineties was a period of significant change — and at times upheaval – for the University of Massachusetts at Amherst (UMA). On several fronts the campus advanced its position as an important center for teaching, research and service to the public: • The Board of Higher Education selected UMass Amherst in 1997 as the home of the statewide honors college — Commonwealth College. The first class was enrolled in 1999. • For the past two years, UMass Amherst has been named one of the institutions offering the best value for the money in the Kaplan/Newsweek college guide, and this year was also listed as a leading school supporting diversity. • The 1995 National Research Council (NRC) ranking of research doctoral programs placed UMass Amherst in the top 25% nationally in Linguistics, Materials Science, Psychology, Computer Sciences, Chemical Engineering, and Electrical Engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Superfast Broadband Projects Directory 2014: Crunch Year for Superfast UK
    UK Superfast Broadband Projects Directory 2014: crunch year for Superfast UK Prepared by: Annelise Berendt Date: 14 February 2014 Version: 1.0 Point Topic Ltd 73 Farringdon Road London EC1M 3JQ, UK Tel. +44 (0) 20 3301 3305 Email [email protected] Point Topic – UK Plus report – 2014: crunch year for Superfast UK Contents 1. Background 4 2. Introduction 5 3. The service provider picture 8 4. BT Group puts another £50m into the pot 11 4.1 Fibre on Demand developments 11 4.2 Self-install getting closer 12 4.3 Multicast for GEA launched for TV provision 12 4.4 Cornwall passes target and begins to impact local economy 13 4.5 Northern Ireland FTTC network has over 150,000 customers 13 4.6 BT looks to raise its MDU game 14 4.7 Last batch of 19 exchanges quietly announced 14 4.8 BT Retail sees strong fibre-based growth 16 5. Virgin Media increases the speed stakes 17 5.1 Higher speed services and boosts for existing customers 17 5.2 Virgin acquires Smallworld Fibre 17 6. Altnets move into make or break year 18 6.1 CityFibre floats on AIM 18 6.2 Gradwell launches GigaBath based on CityFibre infrastructure 19 6.3 IFNL continues to build homes passed numbers 20 6.4 Hyperoptic launches in Olympic Village 20 6.5 Venus welcomes Connection Voucher Scheme 21 6.6 Community Fibre in Westminster pilot 21 6.7 Velocity1 uses Wembley to showcase the bigger picture 21 6.8 Call Flow Solutions continues private and publicly-funded rollout 22 6.9 Fibre Options seeing increasing developer interest 22 6.10 Gigaclear continues to grow rural footprint 23 6.11 B4RN sticks to its coverage plans 23 6.12 Cybermoor FTTP services go live 24 6.13 LonsdaleNET launches fibre network in Cumbria 24 6.14 TripleConnect in Cumbrian new build fibre deployment 25 6.15 KC fibre connections approach 7,000 lines 25 6.16 The closure of Digital Region 26 6.17 Student fibre sector is a springboard for the wider market 27 Page 2 of 37 Point Topic – UK Plus report – 2014: crunch year for Superfast UK 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP 10 Downing Street London SW1A 2AA 1 June
    Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP 10 Downing Street London SW1A 2AA 1 June 2020 Dear Prime Minister, Please accept our support during these unprecedented times. As with all UK businesses, we are committed to ensuring that all possible efforts are made to save lives and tackle the current health crisis and resulting economic downturn. With the UK facing major economic and social concerns including the risk of high unemployment and rising regional inequality, we believe that an ambitious low carbon growth and environmental improvement agenda can do a lot to address these concerns, as well as make the UK economy better prepared to deal with future shocks such as those related to climate change. We are therefore writing to ask that the economic recovery plans you are developing align with the UK’s wider goals and deliver a clean, just recovery, that creates quality employment and builds a more sustainable, inclusive and resilient UK economy for the future. A wide range of input, from academic experts to city leaders to official advice, has shown measures that cut greenhouse gas emissions and stimulate the economy have the potential to be more effective in supporting jobs and economic growth whilst also supporting our long term climate goals and delivering better outcomes in other key areas of public interest, such as public health and wellbeing. In addition, investments in industries and projects such as building renovation, offshore wind, electric vehicles, environmental improvements and low carbon industrial clusters have the potential to bring investment and job creation across multiple regions of the UK. As businesses and business groups operating in the UK, we reaffirm our commitment to action on climate change and our determination to create a cleaner, competitive and inclusive UK economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 104 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 104 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 141 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, MAY 3, 1995 No. 72 House of Representatives The House met at 11 a.m. and was lead the membership in the Pledge of TIME TO BRING THE AMERICAN called to order by the Speaker pro tem- Allegiance. PEOPLE INTO THE BUDGET DE- pore [Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina]. Mr. DURBIN led the Pledge of Alle- BATE f giance as follows: (Mr. BENTSEN asked and was given DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the permission to address the House for 1 PRO TEMPORE United States of America, and to the Repub- minute.) lic for which it stands, one nation under God, Mr. BENTSEN. Mr. Speaker, the Re- The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. publican majority is getting ready to fore the House the following commu- f make dramatic changes in the Medi- nication from the Speaker: care program. I am concerned that the WASHINGTON, DC, American people will not be included May 3, 1995. THE PRESIDENT'S RELEVANCE AND MEDICARE in this debate. I hereby designate the Honorable BOB The Republican majority has already INGLIS to act as Speaker pro tempore on this (Mr. DELAY asked and was given per- day. missed the deadline to submit a budg- mission to address the House for 1 NEWT GINGRICH, et. To balance the budget and save $1 Speaker of the House of Representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts
    Annual Report and Accounts 2016 and Accounts Annual Report Nationwide Building Society Annual Report and Accounts 2016 2016 Annual Report and Accounts Delivering value for our members Because we’re owned by our members, not shareholders. Because we’re a building society and our mutual values ensure we put our members first. Because delivering value for our members is the reason why we exist. Contents Strategic Report 2016 Society highlights 5 Chairman’s statement 7 Chief Executive’s review 11 Report Strategic Strategic review 17 Financial review 27 Risk overview 37 Our people 39 Citizenship report 43 The Nationwide Foundation 53 Governance Board of directors 57 Group directors 61 Governance Directors’ report 63 Report of the directors on corporate governance 69 Report of the directors on remuneration 93 Business and Risk Report Introduction 107 Business and Risk Report Business Principal risks 108 Top and emerging risks 109 Lending risk 111 Financial risk 151 Operational risk 183 Conduct and compliance risk 186 Strategic risk 188 Managing risk 189 Financial Statements Financial Statements Independent auditors’ report 195 Accounts 202 Notes to the accounts 208 Other Information Annual business statement 289 Other Information Forward looking statements 293 Glossary 294 Index 304 2 Back to Contents 2016 Annual Report and Accounts Strategic Report 2016 Society highlights 5 Chairman’s statement 7 Chief Executive’s review 11 Strategic review 17 Financial review 27 Risk overview 37 Our people 39 Citizenship report 43 The Nationwide Foundation 53 The Strategic Report on pages 3 to 54 has been approved by the board of directors and signed on its behalf by: Joe Garner Chief Executive 23 May 2016 3 Back to Contents Strategic Report Strategic Report Report Strategic 4 Back to Contents 2016 Annual Report and Accounts 2016 Society highlights Our vision is to be the UK’s first choice financial services provider.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 3, No. 2 & 3, Summer/Fall 1973
    THE COCHISE QUARTERLY Volume 3 Number 2 & 3 Summer and Fall 1973 CONTENTS Mr. Butterfield's Route by John O. Theobald 3 Pioneers In Profile by Glenn G. Dunham 11 The Amos Wien Family-Pioneers In Profile by Beatrice Wien 18 The Gadsden Hotel by Kay Gregor 24 COVER PHOTOGRAPH The Overland Mail Company's stagecoach rocks across the desert near Picacho Peak on its way to Tucson and the, East in this illustra- tion depicting Arizona's pre-Civil War public transportation. The historic Butterfield route is traced by John Theobald, who is consid- ered an authority on the subject. A Publication of the Cochise County Historical and Archaeological Society P. O. Box 818 Douglas, Arizona 85607 2 MR. BUTTERFIELD'S ROUTE It stretched 437 miles across Arizona, bringing the first stagecoaches through lands infested by hostile Indians, outlaws and cruel caprices of nature by John O. Theobald Editor's note-The article Mr. Butterfield's Route was first published on February 5, 1967, in Arizona Magazine, a part of the Sunday Edition of the Arizona Republic. We are indebted to the Arizona Magazine for permission to re-print the article here in the Quarterly. We are also indebted to Lillian G. Theobald, wife of the late John O. Theo- bald for her kind permission to use the material. It was about 6 p.m. Oct. 1, 1858, that the first stagecoach of the westbound Overland Mail crossed the line that was later to divide Arizona and New Mexico as territories and states. It was part of the beginning of one of our country's greatest transportation achievements, the first attempt at a schedule time- table transcontinental link between the East and West.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report & Form 20-F 2016
    BT Group plc Annual Report & Form 20-F 2016 Broadening and deepening our customer relationships Front cover and above image Bethany Johnson, BT apprentice Bethany’s Story The cover of our 2016 Annual Report features Bethany Johnson, a service delivery apprentice in her second year with the company. Working for Openreach, Bethany makes a difference to customers every day, helping them to get connected and making sure they’re happy with their service. For Bethany, her role is about earning the customers’ trust and doing a vital job right, the first time. Bethany is one of 1,700 apprentices and graduates that we’ve hired in the past two years, with a further 1,400 roles announced in February 2016. We’ll also have returned 2,000 contact centre roles to the UK as part of our commitment to answer more customer service calls within the UK. This is one Online Annual Report part of the investment we’re making to deliver superior customer service and www.bt.com/annualreport to grow our business. More than 25m businesses and homes now have access to superfast broadband and the UK has seen a massive increase in average broadband speed – from just 4Mbps in 2009 to almost 29Mbps in 2015. Together with the efforts we are making to transform our costs, our focus on investment and growth will deliver our strategy of broadening and deepening our customer relationships. Find out more throughout this Annual Report and on our website. Delivering our purpose update www.btplc.com/Purposefulbusiness Watch Bethany’s story online www.btplc.com/bethany Welcome to BT Group plc’s Annual Report 2016 This is the BT Annual Report for the year ended Contents 31 March 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study for the SANTA CRUZ VALLEY NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA
    Feasibility Study for the SANTA CRUZ VALLEY NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA FINAL Prepared by the Center for Desert Archaeology April 2005 CREDITS Assembled and edited by: Jonathan Mabry, Center for Desert Archaeology Contributions by (in alphabetical order): Linnea Caproni, Preservation Studies Program, University of Arizona William Doelle, Center for Desert Archaeology Anne Goldberg, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona Andrew Gorski, Preservation Studies Program, University of Arizona Kendall Kroesen, Tucson Audubon Society Larry Marshall, Environmental Education Exchange Linda Mayro, Pima County Cultural Resources Office Bill Robinson, Center for Desert Archaeology Carl Russell, CBV Group J. Homer Thiel, Desert Archaeology, Inc. Photographs contributed by: Adriel Heisey Bob Sharp Gordon Simmons Tucson Citizen Newspaper Tumacácori National Historical Park Maps created by: Catherine Gilman, Desert Archaeology, Inc. Brett Hill, Center for Desert Archaeology James Holmlund, Western Mapping Company Resource information provided by: Arizona Game and Fish Department Center for Desert Archaeology Metropolitan Tucson Convention and Visitors Bureau Pima County Staff Pimería Alta Historical Society Preservation Studies Program, University of Arizona Sky Island Alliance Sonoran Desert Network The Arizona Nature Conservancy Tucson Audubon Society Water Resources Research Center, University of Arizona PREFACE The proposed Santa Cruz Valley National Heritage Area is a big land filled with small details. One’s first impression may be of size and distance—broad valleys rimmed by mountain ranges, with a huge sky arching over all. However, a closer look reveals that, beneath the broad brush strokes, this is a land of astonishing variety. For example, it is comprised of several kinds of desert, year-round flowing streams, and sky island mountain ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • Telecommunications Provider Locator
    Telecommunications Provider Locator Industry Analysis & Technology Division Wireline Competition Bureau January 2010 This report is available for reference in the FCC’s Information Center at 445 12th Street, S.W., Courtyard Level. Copies may be purchased by contacting Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, telephone 800-378-3160, facsimile 202-488-5563, or via e-mail at [email protected]. This report can be downloaded and interactively searched on the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical Reports Internet site located at www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/locator.html. Telecommunications Provider Locator This report lists the contact information, primary telecommunications business and service(s) offered by 6,493 telecommunications providers. The last report was released March 13, 2009.1 The information in this report is drawn from providers’ Telecommunications Reporting Worksheets (FCC Form 499-A). It can be used by customers to identify and locate telecommunications providers, by telecommunications providers to identify and locate others in the industry, and by equipment vendors to identify potential customers. Virtually all providers of telecommunications must file FCC Form 499-A each year.2 These forms are not filed with the FCC but rather with the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC), which serves as the data collection agent. The pool of filers contained in this edition consists of companies that operated and collected revenue during 2007, as well as new companies that file the form to fulfill the Commission’s registration requirement.3 Information from filings received by USAC after October 13, 2008, and from filings that were incomplete has been excluded from this report.
    [Show full text]
  • SCIENCE at the BICENTENNIAL a Report from the Research Community
    SCIENCE AT THE BICENTENNIAL A Report from the Research Community 4ot.UTJcM, m 4fr . lip '?76.191 National Science Board/1976 NATIONAL SCIENCE BOARD DR. NORMAN HACKERMAN (Chairman, National Science Board), President, Rice University DR. RUSSELL D. O'NEAL (Vice Chairman, National Science Board), Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, KMS Industries, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan DR. W. GLENN CAMPBELL, Director, Hoover Institution on War, Revolution, and Peace, Stanford University DR. H. E. CARTER, Coordinator of Interdisciplinary Programs, University of Arizona DR. ROBERT A. CHARPIE, President, Cabot Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts DR. JEWEL PLUMMER COBB, Dean and Professor of Zoology, Connecticut College DR. LLOYD M. COOKE, Director of Urban Affairs and University Relations, Union Carbide Corporation, New York, New York DR. ROBERT H. DICKE, Albert Einstein Professor of Science, Department of Physics, Princeton University DR. DAVID M. GATES, Professor of Botany and Director, Biological Station, Department of Botany, University of Michigan DR. T. MARSHALL HAHN, JR., Executive Vice President, Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Portland, Oregon DR. ANNA J. HARRISON, Professor of Chemistry, Mount Holyoke College DR. ROGER W. HEYNS, President, American Council on Education DR. W. N. HUBBARD, JR., President, The Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, Michigan DR. SAUNDERS MAC LANE, Max Mason Distinguished Service Professor of Mathematics, University of Chicago MR. WILLIAM H. MECKLING, Dean, The Graduate School of Management, The University of Rochester DR. GROVER E. MURRAY, President, Texas Tech University and Texas Tech University School of Medicine DR. WILLIAM A. NIERENBERG, Director, Scripps Institution of Oceanography DR. FRANK PRESS, Chairman, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology DR. JOSEPH M.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Department of Health Services Division of Public Health Services Bureau of Health Systems Development
    Arizona Department of Health Services Division of Public Health Services Bureau of Health Systems Development Designation of Arizona Medically Underserved Areas October 2016 Douglas A. Ducey, Governor Cara M. Christ, Director http://www.azdhs.gov/prevention/health-systems-development/data-reports-maps/index.php#reports BUREAU OF HEALTH SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT, Arizona Department of Health Services October 2016 Page 1 of 25 INTRODUCTION The Arizona Medically Underserved Area (AzMUA) report is prepared by the Arizona Department of Health Services, as mandated by A.R.S. § 36-2352. Within the Arizona Department of Health Services, Division of Public Health, the Bureau of Health Systems Development (HSD) is responsible for activities associated with the implementation of A.R.S. § 36-2352. HSD is responsible for assisting communities in obtaining both state and federal shortage designations. Additionally, HSD manages the Arizona Loan Repayment Programs established by A.R.S. § 36-2172 and A.R.S. § 36-2174. The Arizona Loan Repayment Programs provide incentives in the form of loan repayment for primary health care providers to work in medically underserved areas. The Arizona Rural Private Practice Loan Repayment Program utilizes AzMUA designation as a criteria. Non-Department programs that require AzMUA designation include: the Arizona Medical Student Loan Program under A.R.S. Title 15, Chapter 13, Article 7, and priority consideration by the University of Arizona School of Medicine under A.R.S. § 15-1751 for applicants who demonstrate a willingness to practice in the state's underserved areas and the establishment of health service districts pursuant to A.R.S. Title 48, Chapter 16, Article 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Vail,Varizona:Vhistoric Preservation Planvvv[2014]
    VAIL, ARIZONA: HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN [2014] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS [PP. 4] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY [PP. 5] SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW [PP. 8] INTRODUCTION TO THE PLAN INTRODUCTION TO THE VAIL AREA LEGAL BASIS SECTION 2 VAIL HISTORY AND HERITAGE [PP. 26] PREHISTORIC HISTORY: TRANSPORTATION HISTORY: CATTLE RANCHING HISTORY: MINING HISTORY: COMMUNITY HISTORIC RESOURCE SURVEY SECTION 3 PRESERVATION: PAST PRESERVATION EFFORTS AND A RENEWED EMPHASIS [PP. 54] PAST PRESERVATION EFFORTS A RENEWED EMPHASIS: VAIL AS CULTURAL LANDSCAPE SECTION 4 PLANNING: LAND-USE AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT [PP.60] ZONING GROWTH MANAGEMENT SECTION 5 COMMUNITY: DEFINING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION [PP. 71] SECTION 6 RECOMMENDATIONS: BUILDING A PRESERVATION PROGRAM IN VAIL [PP.75] SAVING THE OLD VAIL POST OFFICE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE STUDY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND INCENTIVE PROGRAMS TOWN SITE DESIGN CONCEPTS AND ALTERNATIVES SECTION 7 GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND ACTIONS [PP.98] RESOURCES AND APPENDICES [PP.101] Image 1 (on title page): Original Vail Town Site, including Old Vail Road (Highway 80), The Shrine of Santa Rita in the Desert in the Desert and The 1908 Vail & Post Office, March 1935 Shrine Dedication. (Courtesy Catholic Diocese of Tucson Archives) 2 TABLES AND MAPS Table 1: Previous Cultural Resource ManageMent Projects within One Mile of the Historic Town Site (pp. 54) Table 2: Previously Identified Historic Properties within One Mile of Historic Town Site (pp. 55) Table 3: Zoning Definitions (pp. 67-68) Map 1 Project location: Vail, Arizona original town site at Colossal Cave Road and Old Vail Road (previously Highway 80) Map 2 One-mile focus zone, centered around the original town site and 1908 Vail & Post Office Map 3 One-mile “focus zone,” and five-mile “conteXtual zone”; together, the Vail Historic Preservation Plan focus area Map 4 The location of the post office and town site within the one-mile “focus zone” with the overall conteXt of land ownership in the area.
    [Show full text]