Understanding Quadratic Functions and Solving Quadratic Equations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Understanding Quadratic Functions and Solving Quadratic Equations Understanding Quadratic Functions and Solving Quadratic Equations: An Analysis of Student Thinking and Reasoning Leslie Ellen Johnson Nielsen A dissertation to be submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON 2015 Reading Committee: Elham Kazemi, Chair Kara Jackson Ron Irving Program Authorized to Offer Degree: College of Education © Copyright 2015 Leslie Ellen Johnson Nielsen University of Washington Abstract Understanding Quadratic Functions and Solving Quadratic Equations: An Analysis of Student Thinking and Reasoning Leslie Ellen Johnson Nielsen Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Elham Kazemi College of Education Understanding quadratic functions is critical to student success in high school mathematics and beyond, yet very little is known about what students understand about these functions. There is agreement in the field that quadratics are one of the most conceptually challenging subjects in the secondary mathematics curriculum. However, research on student learning in this area has focused on procedural aspects of solving equations, with very little known about student understanding of the behavior of quadratic functions. This study sought to learn what high school students who have completed an Algebra 2 or Precalculus class understand about quadratics. Specifically, what connections, if any, do they make between representations of quadratic functions? How do students approach solving quadratic equations, and how do they interpret the solutions? Lastly, what cognitive affordances support them in their learning and understanding of quadratic functions, and what cognitive obstacles do they encounter? This qualitative study employed cognitive interviews of 27 students in grades nine through eleven. The data included video and audio recordings as well as student work, captured on a smart pen pencast. The data was analyzed in four phases: (1) focusing on one student at a time, (2) focusing on individual problems, (3) focusing across students, and then (4) revisiting individual problems across students using a conceptual framework grounded in big ideas and essential understandings of quadratics and a children’s mathematical learning perspective. I found that students have a strong sense of the symmetry of the parent function, but are not consistently able to explain the cause of that symmetry. As students solved equations and graphed functions, they transitioned between equations set equal to constant values, expressions, and equations defining functions. At times this was a productive strategy, but for some students it reflected confusion about what they were solving. Lastly, I found that students apply their understandings from work with linear functions to solving and graphing quadratic equations. This study provides an initial framework for how students think about quadratic functions which may enable mathematics educators to better interpret how students’ prior learning influences their understanding of big ideas within the study of quadratic functions. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ............................................................................................................................ iii List of Figures ........................................................................................................................... iii Chapter 1: Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2: Framing Ideas and Informing Literature .................................................... 6 Big Ideas and Essential Understandings of Quadratic Functions ...................................... 6 Conceptualizing Student Learning ............................................................................................ 20 Students’ Understandings Of Quadratics: A Review Of The Literature ........................ 28 Chapter 3: Research Methods and Study Design ........................................................ 37 Setting .................................................................................................................................................. 37 Participants ....................................................................................................................................... 37 Data Collection .................................................................................................................................. 39 Cognitive Interviews ....................................................................................................................... 39 Data Analysis ..................................................................................................................................... 43 CHAPTER 4: FINDINGS ......................................................................................................... 52 Student Performance Across Solving Problems ................................................................... 53 Demographic Differences ............................................................................................................. 55 The Problems .................................................................................................................................... 56 How Students Think About Quadratics, The Parent Function And Symmetry Of Quadratics .......................................................................................................................................... 66 The Parent Function and Symmetry of Quadratics ............................................................. 67 Affordances of Considering the Parent Function for Solving Quadratic Equations . 71 Obstacles Related to Symmetry .................................................................................................. 73 i “Solving What?” What students think they are solving or solving for when they work with quadratic equations and functions ...................................................................... 77 The Impact Of Students’ Linear Thinking On Solving Quadratic Equations And Graphing Quadratic Functions .................................................................................................... 84 Appling Linear Techniques When Solving Quadratic Equations .................................... 85 Linear Thinking When Graphing Quadratic Functions ...................................................... 91 CHAPTER 5: DISCUSSION ..................................................................................................... 97 Linear Thinking when Solving .................................................................................................... 98 Solving What? .................................................................................................................................. 101 Quality of Explanations ............................................................................................................... 105 Framework of Student Learning in Quadratics .................................................................. 108 Contributions .................................................................................................................................. 115 Limitations ....................................................................................................................................... 116 Directions for Future Research ................................................................................................ 117 Implications for Instruction ...................................................................................................... 118 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................ 127 References .............................................................................................................................. 128 Appendices ............................................................................................................................. 135 APPENDIX A: INTERVIEW PROTOCOL .......................................................................... 136 APPENDIX B: STUDY DESIGN TABLE ............................................................................. 142 APPENDIX C: ANTICIPATED CORRECT SOLUTIONS METHODS ........................... 148 APPENDIX D: STUDENT RESPONSE FORM ................................................................... 161 APPENDIX E: CODES ............................................................................................................ 164 ii LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Participant Grade Level and Teacher by Course 38 Table 2: Scoring Values for Students’ Initial Responses to Problems 48 Table 3: Student Response Code Point Values 53 Table 4: Student performance on solving equations on a 4-point scale 54 Table 5: Foundational Understandings 109 Table 6: Framework of Student Learning in Quadratics 114 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Table and Graph for the Parent Function 9 Figure 2. Solving Quadratic Functions 13 Figure 3: Completing the Square 15 Figure 4: Conceptual Understanding of Quadratics 19 Figure 5: Relationships between expressions and equations 20 Figure 6: Graph of a parabola without a visible y-intercept 31 Figure 7: Pencast of Student Work in Livescribe Player 43 Figure 8: Tabitha's Box Method for Factoring 58 Figure 9: Tracy's Work 62 Figure 10: Tabitha's Sketch of the Parent Function
Recommended publications
  • A Computational Approach to Solve a System of Transcendental Equations with Multi-Functions and Multi-Variables
    mathematics Article A Computational Approach to Solve a System of Transcendental Equations with Multi-Functions and Multi-Variables Chukwuma Ogbonnaya 1,2,* , Chamil Abeykoon 3 , Adel Nasser 1 and Ali Turan 4 1 Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Alex Ekwueme Federal University, Ndufu Alike Ikwo, Abakaliki PMB 1010, Nigeria 3 Aerospace Research Institute and Northwest Composites Centre, School of Materials, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; [email protected] 4 Independent Researcher, Manchester M22 4ES, Lancashire, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-(0)74-3850-3799 Abstract: A system of transcendental equations (SoTE) is a set of simultaneous equations containing at least a transcendental function. Solutions involving transcendental equations are often problematic, particularly in the form of a system of equations. This challenge has limited the number of equations, with inter-related multi-functions and multi-variables, often included in the mathematical modelling of physical systems during problem formulation. Here, we presented detailed steps for using a code- based modelling approach for solving SoTEs that may be encountered in science and engineering problems. A SoTE comprising six functions, including Sine-Gordon wave functions, was used to illustrate the steps. Parametric studies were performed to visualize how a change in the variables Citation: Ogbonnaya, C.; Abeykoon, affected the superposition of the waves as the independent variable varies from x1 = 1:0.0005:100 to C.; Nasser, A.; Turan, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Math 1232-04F (Survey of Calculus) Dr. J.S. Zheng Chapter R. Functions
    Math 1232-04F (Survey of Calculus) Dr. J.S. Zheng Chapter R. Functions, Graphs, and Models R.4 Slope and Linear Functions R.5* Nonlinear Functions and Models R.6 Exponential and Logarithmic Functions R.7* Mathematical Modeling and Curve Fitting • Linear Functions (11) Graph the following equations. Determine if they are functions. (a) y = 2 (b) x = 2 (c) y = 3x (d) y = −2x + 4 (12) Definition. The variable y is directly proportional to x (or varies directly with x) if there is some positive constant m such that y = mx. We call m the constant of proportionality, or variation constant. (13) The weight M of a person's muscles is directly proportional to the person's body weight W . It is known that a person weighing 200 lb has 80 lb of muscle. (a) Find an equation of variation expressing M as a function of W . (b) What is the muscle weight of a person weighing 120 lb? (14) Definition. A linear function is any function that can be written in the form y = mx + b or f(x) = mx + b, called the slope-intercept equation of a line. The constant m is called the slope. The point (0; b) is called the y-intercept. (15) Find the slope and y-intercept of the graph of 3x + 5y − 2 = 0. (16) Find an equation of the line that has slope 4 and passes through the point (−1; 1). (17) Definition. The equation y − y1 = m(x − x1) is called the point-slope equation of a line. The point is (x1; y1), and the slope is m.
    [Show full text]
  • Solving Equations; Patterns, Functions, and Algebra; 8.15A
    Mathematics Enhanced Scope and Sequence – Grade 8 Solving Equations Reporting Category Patterns, Functions, and Algebra Topic Solving equations in one variable Primary SOL 8.15a The student will solve multistep linear equations in one variable with the variable on one and two sides of the equation. Materials • Sets of algebra tiles • Equation-Solving Balance Mat (attached) • Equation-Solving Ordering Cards (attached) • Be the Teacher: Solving Equations activity sheet (attached) • Student whiteboards and markers Vocabulary equation, variable, coefficient, constant (earlier grades) Student/Teacher Actions (what students and teachers should be doing to facilitate learning) 1. Give each student a set of algebra tiles and a copy of the Equation-Solving Balance Mat. Lead students through the steps for using the tiles to model the solutions to the following equations. As you are working through the solution of each equation with the students, point out that you are undoing each operation and keeping the equation balanced by doing the same thing to both sides. Explain why you do this. When students are comfortable with modeling equation solutions with algebra tiles, transition to writing out the solution steps algebraically while still using the tiles. Eventually, progress to only writing out the steps algebraically without using the tiles. • x + 3 = 6 • x − 2 = 5 • 3x = 9 • 2x + 1 = 9 • −x + 4 = 7 • −2x − 1 = 7 • 3(x + 1) = 9 • 2x = x − 5 Continue to allow students to use the tiles whenever they wish as they work to solve equations. 2. Give each student a whiteboard and marker. Provide students with a problem to solve, and as they write each step, have them hold up their whiteboards so you can ensure that they are completing each step correctly and understanding the process.
    [Show full text]
  • Write the Function in Standard Form
    Write The Function In Standard Form Bealle often suppurates featly when active Davidson lopper fleetly and ray her paedogenesis. Tressed Jesse still outmaneuvers: clinometric and georgic Augie diphthongises quite dirtily but mistitling her indumentum sustainedly. If undefended or gobioid Allen usually pulsate his Orientalism miming jauntily or blow-up stolidly and headfirst, how Alhambresque is Gustavo? Now the vertex always sits exactly smack dab between the roots, when you do have roots. For the two sides to be equal, the corresponding coefficients must be equal. So, changing the value of p vertically stretches or shrinks the parabola. To save problems you must sign in. This short tutorial helps you learn how to find vertex, focus, and directrix of a parabola equation with an example using the formulas. The draft was successfully published. To determine the domain and range of any function on a graph, the general idea is to assume that they are both real numbers, then look for places where no values exist. For our purposes, this is close enough. English has also become the most widely used second language. Simplify the radical, but notice that the number under the radical symbol is negative! On this lesson, you fill learn how to graph a quadratic function, find the axis of symmetry, vertex, and the x intercepts and y intercepts of a parabolawi. Be sure to write the terms with the exponent on the variable in descending order. Wendler Polynomial Webquest Introduction: By the end of this webquest, you will have a deeper understanding of polynomials. Anyone can ask a math question, and most questions get answers! Follow along with the highlighted text while you listen! And if I have an upward opening parabola, the vertex is going to be the minimum point.
    [Show full text]
  • Diffman: an Object-Oriented MATLAB Toolbox for Solving Differential Equations on Manifolds
    Applied Numerical Mathematics 39 (2001) 323–347 www.elsevier.com/locate/apnum DiffMan: An object-oriented MATLAB toolbox for solving differential equations on manifolds Kenth Engø a,∗,1, Arne Marthinsen b,2, Hans Z. Munthe-Kaas a,3 a Department of Informatics, University of Bergen, N-5020 Bergen, Norway b Department of Mathematical Sciences, NTNU, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway Abstract We describe an object-oriented MATLAB toolbox for solving differential equations on manifolds. The software reflects recent development within the area of geometric integration. Through the use of elements from differential geometry, in particular Lie groups and homogeneous spaces, coordinate free formulations of numerical integrators are developed. The strict mathematical definitions and results are well suited for implementation in an object- oriented language, and, due to its simplicity, the authors have chosen MATLAB as the working environment. The basic ideas of DiffMan are presented, along with particular examples that illustrate the working of and the theory behind the software package. 2001 IMACS. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Geometric integration; Numerical integration of ordinary differential equations on manifolds; Numerical analysis; Lie groups; Lie algebras; Homogeneous spaces; Object-oriented programming; MATLAB; Free Lie algebras 1. Introduction DiffMan is an object-oriented MATLAB [24] toolbox designed to solve differential equations evolving on manifolds. The current version of the toolbox addresses primarily the solution of ordinary differential equations. The solution techniques implemented fall into the category of geometric integrators— a very active area of research during the last few years. The essence of geometric integration is to construct numerical methods that respect underlying constraints, for instance, the configuration space * Corresponding author.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 1: Multiplying and Factoring Polynomial Expressions
    NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM Lesson 1 M4 ALGEBRA I Lesson 1: Multiplying and Factoring Polynomial Expressions Classwork Opening Exercise Write expressions for the areas of the two rectangles in the figures given below. 8 2 2 Now write an expression for the area of this rectangle: 8 2 Example 1 The total area of this rectangle is represented by 3a + 3a. Find expressions for the dimensions of the total rectangle. 2 3 + 3 square units 2 푎 푎 Lesson 1: Multiplying and Factoring Polynomial Expressions Date: 2/2/14 S.1 This work is licensed under a © 2014 Common Core, Inc. Some rights reserved. commoncore.org Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM Lesson 1 M4 ALGEBRA I Exercises 1–3 Factor each by factoring out the Greatest Common Factor: 1. 10 + 5 푎푏 푎 2. 3 9 + 3 2 푔 ℎ − 푔 ℎ 12ℎ 3. 6 + 9 + 18 2 3 4 5 푦 푦 푦 Discussion: Language of Polynomials A prime number is a positive integer greater than 1 whose only positive integer factors are 1 and itself. A composite number is a positive integer greater than 1 that is not a prime number. A composite number can be written as the product of positive integers with at least one factor that is not 1 or itself. For example, the prime number 7 has only 1 and 7 as its factors. The composite number 6 has factors of 1, 2, 3, and 6; it could be written as the product 2 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Strategies for Improving Algebra Knowledge in Middle and High School Students
    EDUCATOR’S PRACTICE GUIDE A set of recommendations to address challenges in classrooms and schools WHAT WORKS CLEARINGHOUSE™ Teaching Strategies for Improving Algebra Knowledge in Middle and High School Students NCEE 2015-4010 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION About this practice guide The Institute of Education Sciences (IES) publishes practice guides in education to provide edu- cators with the best available evidence and expertise on current challenges in education. The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) develops practice guides in conjunction with an expert panel, combining the panel’s expertise with the findings of existing rigorous research to produce spe- cific recommendations for addressing these challenges. The WWC and the panel rate the strength of the research evidence supporting each of their recommendations. See Appendix A for a full description of practice guides. The goal of this practice guide is to offer educators specific, evidence-based recommendations that address the challenges of teaching algebra to students in grades 6 through 12. This guide synthesizes the best available research and shares practices that are supported by evidence. It is intended to be practical and easy for teachers to use. The guide includes many examples in each recommendation to demonstrate the concepts discussed. Practice guides published by IES are available on the What Works Clearinghouse website at http://whatworks.ed.gov. How to use this guide This guide provides educators with instructional recommendations that can be implemented in conjunction with existing standards or curricula and does not recommend a particular curriculum. Teachers can use the guide when planning instruction to prepare students for future mathemat- ics and post-secondary success.
    [Show full text]
  • Step-By-Step Solution Possibilities in Different Computer Algebra Systems
    Step-by-Step Solution Possibilities in Different Computer Algebra Systems Eno Tõnisson University of Tartu Estonia E-mail: [email protected] Introduction The aim of my research is to compare different computer algebra systems, and specifically to find out how the students could solve problems step-by-step using different computer algebra systems. The present paper provides the preliminary comparison of some aspects related to step-by-step solution in DERIVE, Maple, Mathematica, and MuPAD. The paper begins with examples of one-step solutions of equations. This is followed by a cursory survey of useful commands, entering commands, programming etc. I hope that a more detailed and complete review will be composed quite soon. Suggestions for complementing the comparison are welcome. It is necessary to know which concrete versions are under consideration. In alphabetical order: DERIVE for Windows. Version 4.11 (1996) Maple V Release 5. Student Version 5.00 (1998) Mathematica for Students. Version 3.0 (1996) MuPAD Light. Version 1.4.1 (1998) Only pure systems (without additional packages, etc.) are under consideration. I believe that there may be more (especially interface-sensitive) possibilities in MuPAD Pro than in MuPAD Light. My paper is not the first comparison, of course. I found several previous ones in the Internet. For example, 1. Michael Wester. A review of CAS mathematical capabilities. 1995 There are 131 short problems covering a broad range of symbolic mathematics. http://math.unm.edu/~wester/cas/Paper.ps (One of the profoundest comparisons is probably M. Wester's book Practical Guide to Computer Algebra Systems.) 1 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Equation-Solving: Linear, Quadratic, and Cubic
    California State University, San Bernardino CSUSB ScholarWorks Theses Digitization Project John M. Pfau Library 2006 The evolution of equation-solving: Linear, quadratic, and cubic Annabelle Louise Porter Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project Part of the Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Porter, Annabelle Louise, "The evolution of equation-solving: Linear, quadratic, and cubic" (2006). Theses Digitization Project. 3069. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/3069 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the John M. Pfau Library at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses Digitization Project by an authorized administrator of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EVOLUTION OF EQUATION-SOLVING LINEAR, QUADRATIC, AND CUBIC A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degre Master of Arts in Teaching: Mathematics by Annabelle Louise Porter June 2006 THE EVOLUTION OF EQUATION-SOLVING: LINEAR, QUADRATIC, AND CUBIC A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino by Annabelle Louise Porter June 2006 Approved by: Shawnee McMurran, Committee Chair Date Laura Wallace, Committee Member , (Committee Member Peter Williams, Chair Davida Fischman Department of Mathematics MAT Coordinator Department of Mathematics ABSTRACT Algebra and algebraic thinking have been cornerstones of problem solving in many different cultures over time. Since ancient times, algebra has been used and developed in cultures around the world, and has undergone quite a bit of transformation. This paper is intended as a professional developmental tool to help secondary algebra teachers understand the concepts underlying the algorithms we use, how these algorithms developed, and why they work.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature of the Discriminant
    Name: ___________________________ Date: ___________ Class Period: _____ Nature of the Discriminant Quadratic − b b 2 − 4ac x = b2 − 4ac Discriminant Formula 2a The discriminant predicts the “nature of the roots of a quadratic equation given that a, b, and c are rational numbers. It tells you the number of real roots/x-intercepts associated with a quadratic function. Value of the Example showing nature of roots of Graph indicating x-intercepts Discriminant b2 – 4ac ax2 + bx + c = 0 for y = ax2 + bx + c POSITIVE Not a perfect x2 – 2x – 7 = 0 2 b – 4ac > 0 square − (−2) (−2)2 − 4(1)(−7) x = 2(1) 2 32 2 4 2 x = = = 1 2 2 2 2 Discriminant: 32 There are two real roots. These roots are irrational. There are two x-intercepts. Perfect square x2 + 6x + 5 = 0 − 6 62 − 4(1)(5) x = 2(1) − 6 16 − 6 4 x = = = −1,−5 2 2 Discriminant: 16 There are two real roots. These roots are rational. There are two x-intercepts. ZERO b2 – 4ac = 0 x2 – 2x + 1 = 0 − (−2) (−2)2 − 4(1)(1) x = 2(1) 2 0 2 x = = = 1 2 2 Discriminant: 0 There is one real root (with a multiplicity of 2). This root is rational. There is one x-intercept. NEGATIVE b2 – 4ac < 0 x2 – 3x + 10 = 0 − (−3) (−3)2 − 4(1)(10) x = 2(1) 3 − 31 3 31 x = = i 2 2 2 Discriminant: -31 There are two complex/imaginary roots. There are no x-intercepts. Quadratic Formula and Discriminant Practice 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Formula Sheet 1 Factoring Formulas 2 Exponentiation Rules
    Formula Sheet 1 Factoring Formulas For any real numbers a and b, (a + b)2 = a2 + 2ab + b2 Square of a Sum (a − b)2 = a2 − 2ab + b2 Square of a Difference a2 − b2 = (a − b)(a + b) Difference of Squares a3 − b3 = (a − b)(a2 + ab + b2) Difference of Cubes a3 + b3 = (a + b)(a2 − ab + b2) Sum of Cubes 2 Exponentiation Rules p r For any real numbers a and b, and any rational numbers and , q s ap=qar=s = ap=q+r=s Product Rule ps+qr = a qs ap=q = ap=q−r=s Quotient Rule ar=s ps−qr = a qs (ap=q)r=s = apr=qs Power of a Power Rule (ab)p=q = ap=qbp=q Power of a Product Rule ap=q ap=q = Power of a Quotient Rule b bp=q a0 = 1 Zero Exponent 1 a−p=q = Negative Exponents ap=q 1 = ap=q Negative Exponents a−p=q Remember, there are different notations: p q a = a1=q p q ap = ap=q = (a1=q)p 1 3 Quadratic Formula Finally, the quadratic formula: if a, b and c are real numbers, then the quadratic polynomial equation ax2 + bx + c = 0 (3.1) has (either one or two) solutions p −b ± b2 − 4ac x = (3.2) 2a 4 Points and Lines Given two points in the plane, P = (x1; y1);Q = (x2; y2) you can obtain the following information: p 2 2 1. The distance between them, d(P; Q) = (x2 − x1) + (y2 − y1) . x + x y + y 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing a Computer Algebra System Capable of Generating Pedagogical Step-By-Step Solutions
    DEGREE PROJECT IN COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, SECOND CYCLE, 30 CREDITS STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2016 Constructing a Computer Algebra System Capable of Generating Pedagogical Step-by-Step Solutions DMITRIJ LIOUBARTSEV KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND COMMUNICATION Constructing a Computer Algebra System Capable of Generating Pedagogical Step-by-Step Solutions DMITRIJ LIOUBARTSEV Examenrapport vid NADA Handledare: Mårten Björkman Examinator: Olof Bälter Abstract For the problem of producing pedagogical step-by-step so- lutions to mathematical problems in education, standard methods and algorithms used in construction of computer algebra systems are often not suitable. A method of us- ing rules to manipulate mathematical expressions in small steps is suggested and implemented. The problem of creat- ing a step-by-step solution by choosing which rule to apply and when to do it is redefined as a graph search problem and variations of the A* algorithm are used to solve it. It is all put together into one prototype solver that was evalu- ated in a study. The study was a questionnaire distributed among high school students. The results showed that while the solutions were not as good as human-made ones, they were competent. Further improvements of the method are suggested that would probably lead to better solutions. Referat Konstruktion av ett datoralgebrasystem kapabelt att generera pedagogiska steg-för-steg-lösningar För problemet att producera pedagogiska steg-för-steg lös- ningar till matematiska problem inom utbildning, är vanli- ga metoder och algoritmer som används i konstruktion av datoralgebrasystem ofta inte lämpliga. En metod som an- vänder regler för att manipulera matematiska uttryck i små steg föreslås och implementeras.
    [Show full text]