SIGINT: the Mission Cubesats Are Made for a Small Country’S Perspective
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Naval Research Laboratory 22 June 1960 SIGINT: The Mission CubeSats are Made For A Small Country’s Perspective 32nd Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites 1 ISIS - Innovative Solutions In Space Vertically Integrated Small Satellite Company SATELLITE CUBESAT LAUNCH SERVICES R&D SERVICES SOLUTIONS PRODUCTS 2 SIGINT – ELINT – Spectrum Monitoring SIGINT SpectrumCOMINT Monitoring ELINT FISINT/TELINT TECHNICAL OPERATIONAL • Discover new systems • Location • Details about emissions • Schedule • Performance estimation • Movement • ECM development • Warning 3 Spectrum Monitoring Causes of Interference Source: Eutelsat briefing to the ITU (2013) 4 Miniturization 5 ELINT: Single-Satellite Solution Lotos-S/Pion-NKS 8 - 12 m Images courtesy of RussianSpaceWeb 6 ELINT: Direction Finding Direction of Arrival/Angle of Arrival 7 Fundamental Limits Why the Shrink-Ray Won’t Work Size has effect on direction finding accuracy because of: • Antenna gain (i.e. SNR) • Number of array elements that can be placed • Array element spacing A 6U-face of CubeSat offers very limited real estate Images courtesy of NASA 8 BRIK-II Royal Netherlannds Air Force 9 ELINT: Multi-Satellite Solution Naval Ocean Surveillance System Picture by John C. Murphy 10 Capacité de Renseignement Electromagnétique Spatiale (CERES) 781 M€ Essaim 216 M€ 2004 Elisa 115 M€ 2007 2009 2011 CERES 450 M€ 2013 2015 2020 Images courtesy of CNES 11 Miniturization through Distribution Opening Up The Trade Space Number of satellites in orbit Image courtesy of the Science and Technology Policy Institute 12 Radio Astronomy An Intransparent Affair 13 Orbiting Low Frequency Antennas for Radio Astronomy < 100 km > 50 satellites = 0.006° (30 MHz) 14 Maturing CubeSats for ELINT/Spectrum Monitoring & Astronomy Development Areas Station-Keeping ISL & Synchronization 2-100 Satellites Relative Position Knowledge From A. Budianu et al. (2011) Reliability 15 In Progress… 16 Summary • Fundamental limits to miniturization of single satellite ELINT solutions can be overcome by distributed architectures • Fundamental limits to ground-based radio astronomy due to frequencies of interest can also be overcome by distributed space-based architectures • Similiarity in mission characteristics of ELINT, Spectrum Monitoring and Radio Astronomy points towards alignment of CubeSat development efforts • Development in the fields of CubeSat reliability, station-keeping, ISL & synchronization and none-GNSS based position determination still required [email protected] www.isispace.nl | www.isilaunch.com | www.cubesatshop.com 17 A Familiar Trade Source: Electronic Warfare and Radar Systems Engineering Handbook Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division 18 19 TDOA Geometry versus Accuracy 20 Direction Finding (DOA) Angular Error Angular Error DOA-vector DOA-vector nadir nadir Geolocation: Geolocation Given known position Error Geolocation intersection between Error DOA-vector and Earth surface: Hence for the same Same Angular Error angular accuracy the geolocation error grows Larger Geolocation Error with distance from receiver 21 Tselina-D Image: Ralf Vandebergh 22 Direction Finding (DOA) Angular Error DOA-vector EORSAT (RU) Elevation (ε) Tselnia (RU) Accuracy: 2 km nadir Altitude: 410 km Altitude: 650 km Geolocation ε = 90° Accuracy: ε = 5° ε = 30° Error (nadir) • 9 km – 46 km Angular 0.027° 0.076° 0.279° 8 – 230 km Geolocation: Error • Given known position intersection • 10 km between DOA-vector and Earth ε = 90° ε = 5° ε = 30° surface: (nadir) Angular Error (8 km) 0.196° 0.705° Hence for the same angular Angular Error (220 km) 0.330° accuracy the geolocation error Angular Error (10 km) 0.020° 0.247° 0.881° grows with distance from receiver If 0.705° at nadir is accurate, this would give an εmin of 9° for 220 km 23 Result Angular Error Smallest Mode Largest Angular Error 0.03° 0.1° - 0.3° 0.881° DOA-vector Elevation (ε) Typical direction finding accuracy nadir (DOA) from literature Geolocation (research funded by USAF, USN, DOD): Error 1° - 0.1° 24 DOA versus SNR ≅ 4 2 = = 2 4 2 � ⇒ ∝ 4 � Higher SNR: + • beam width of DOA + estimation spectrum � becomes narrow • of the signal becomes clearer • accuracy of MUSIC algorithm is increased 25 DOA versus Number of Array Elements Increasing the number of + array elements: + • beam width of DOA � estimation spectrum becomes narrow • directivity of the array improves 26 DOA versus Array Element Spacing Increasing array element spacing : • beam width of DOA estimation spectrum −⁄− becomes narrow • resolution of MUSIC algorithm improves Provided the spacing < half the wavelength 27.