DOCSLIB.ORG

The Lived Experience of Monogamy Among Gay Men in Monogamous Relationships

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Lived Experience of Monogamy Among Gay Men in Monogamous Relationships Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2020 The Lived Experience of Monogamy Among Gay Men in Monogamous Relationships Kellie L. Barton Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Clinical Psychology Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Walden University College of Social and Behavioral Sciences This is to certify that the doctoral dissertation by Kellie Barton has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Chet Lesniak, Committee Chairperson, Psychology Faculty Dr. Scott Friedman, Committee Member, Psychology Faculty Dr. Susan Marcus, University Reviewer, Psychology Faculty Chief Academic Officer and Provost Sue Subocz, Ph.D. Walden University 2020 Abstract The Lived Experience of Monogamy Among Gay Men in Monogamous Relationships by Kellie Barton MS, Walden University, 2012 BS, University of Phoenix, 2010 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Clinical Psychology Walden University February 2020 Abstract Research on male gay relationships spans more than 50 years, and the focus of most of this research has been on understanding the development processes, consequences, and risk factors of nonmonogamous relationships. Few researchers have explored the nature and meaning of monogamy in the male gay community. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to explore the lived experience of monogamy to give voice to other expressions of gay male relationships and potentially add to the literature surrounding clinical implications of treatment. The framework for developing the research emerged from the construct of the monogamy gap, derived from theories of cultural hegemony and cognitive dissonance. Giorgi’s phenomenological approach was used to explore 2 primary research questions: (a) What is the experience of monogamy in gay male relationships? and (b) What is the experience of the monogamy gap for men in gay relationships? Interviews were conducted with 6 adult men who reported being monogamous for at least 12 months. The results revealed that the experience of monogamy is not as portrayed in typical research and literature. Key themes that emerged were family of origin, societal expectations, infidelity versus monogamy, and communications of expectations related to monogamy. The discussion of social change centers on medical, mental, and personal well-being of this target group, and sharing the results of this study to inform researchers, clinicians, and those working with marginalized gay adult men. The Lived Experience of Monogamy Among Gay Men in Monogamous Relationships by Kellie Barton MA, Walden University, 2012 BS, University of Phoenix, 2010 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Clinical Psychology Walden University February 2020 Dedication For my children, Joey, Aubrey, and Kai, who have sacrificed with me through this experience. Their support, encouragement, and understanding of the time and commitment to this process has been a daily reminder to me of why I began this journey and who I am working for. To all the men who have experienced negative stigma due to their sexual orientation, know that there are researchers working to obtain more accurate data, clinicians striving to provide a greater quality of care, and people who desire a better understanding of your experience. Acknowledgements I am grateful for and appreciative of the people who have played a significant role in my dissertation process. First and foremost, I thank Dr. Arcella Trimble who set the standard in my Academic Year in Residency that the dissertation stage is where the hard work happens and is not the time to quit. To Dr. Chet Lesniak who took on my dissertation and remained on as my chair despite many pauses and subsequent submission attempts. I appreciate the insights from Dr. Scott Friedman, second committee member, who helped me view the process through a different lens and the URR Dr. Susan Marcus who provided thoughtful and constructive feedback. I thank my family who continued to cheer me on and never wavered in their support. Dr. Brenda Murrow who provided invaluable insight and knowledge throughout the writing process. I especially want to thank all the participants in this study for their willingness to share their story and their contribution of knowledge to an often misunderstood and misrepresented area. Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction to the Study ....................................................................................1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 Background of the Study ...............................................................................................2 Problem Statement .........................................................................................................5 Purpose of the Study ......................................................................................................5 Research Questions ........................................................................................................5 Conceptual Framework and Theoretical Foundation .....................................................6 Conceptual Framework ............................................................................................6 Theoretical Foundation ............................................................................................8 Nature of the Study ......................................................................................................10 Definitions....................................................................................................................11 Assumptions .................................................................................................................12 Scope and Delimitations ..............................................................................................13 Limitations ...................................................................................................................15 Significance..................................................................................................................16 Summary ......................................................................................................................17 Chapter 2: Literature Review .............................................................................................18 Introduction ..................................................................................................................18 Literature Search Strategy............................................................................................18 Historical Context of Homosexuality ..........................................................................19 Emergence of Homosexuality as a Disease Model ................................................19 Transformation From Disease Model to Choice and Sexual Expression ..............20 i Monogamy and Relationship Health in Gay Couples ..................................................22 Comparative Studies: Hetero/Homosexual Relationship Satisfaction, Health, and Longevity ...............................................................................................................22 Research on Monogamy and Relationship Health .................................................26 Current Research on Relationship Health in Gay Couples ....................................27 Studies of Monogamy in Gay Male Couples .........................................................27 Role of Health and Medical Concerns ...................................................................34 Cultural Pressures and Conformity ........................................................................36 Effect on Health due to Changes in State and Federal Law ..................................39 Conceptual and Theoretical Framework .......................................................................40 Defining Monogamy ..............................................................................................41 Framework for the Current Study ..........................................................................42 Monogamy Gap .....................................................................................................42 Research Examining the Tenets of Monogamy Gap Theory .................................42 Cultural Hegemony ................................................................................................46 Cognitive Dissonance ............................................................................................47 Theoretical Application .........................................................................................49 Summary ......................................................................................................................49 Chapter 3: Research Method
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Men's Endorsement of Monogamy: the Role of Gendered Relationship
    Men’s Endorsement of Monogamy: The Role of Gendered Relationship Scripts on Beliefs about Committed Relationships, Love, and Romance by Amy Catherine Moors A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Psychology and Women’s Studies) in The University of Michigan 2015 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Terri D. Conley, Chair Assistant Professor Allison N. Earl Associate Professor Robin S. Edelstein Professor Deborah Keller-Cohen © Amy C. Moors 2015 DEDICATION To Susan J. Moors and Richard J. Moors for both of your unwavering support, encouragement, and optimism since 1984. And, to Daniel Ethan Gosnell for your sage advice, smiling face, and willingness to move from the east coast to the midwest. You’re my dreamboat. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I have received support, advice, mentorship, and encouragement from a great number of individuals. I would have ended up on a different path if it was not for my undergraduate mentors at William Paterson University: Katherine Makarec, Elizabeth Haines, Neil Kressel, Jan Pinkston, and Bruce Diamond. I would also like to thank Thomas Toppino for his mentorship and passing down his careful empirical eye to me during my time at Villanova University. My dissertation committee of Terri Conley (my advisor), Robin Edelstein, Debby Keller-Cohen, and Ali Earl have provided me with excellent support and constructive critique as I moved from ideas to completed studies. I am truly grateful for this all-star committee. In addition, Terri, Robin, and Abby Stewart have been deeply influential throughout my six years of training; I have grown in all aspects of scholarship from them.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX B Syphilis Case Illustrating the Application of the Manual APPENDIX B
    APPENDIX B Syphilis Case Illustrating the Application of the Manual APPENDIX B Appendix B Syphilis Case Illustrating the Application of the Manual THE SITUATION After analyzing syphilis morbidity reports and interview records, STD officials in the city of Chancri-La noticed an increase in the number of syphilis cases among men who reported having sex with men (MSM). From 1999 to 2002, the number of MSM cases had gone up, as well as the percentage of MSM cases. In 1999, there was only 1 MSM case, which represented .9% of the syphilis cases in males. By 2002, the number of MSM cases had increased to 14, and represented 29.2% of their male cases. Further analysis revealed that the cases were not concentrated in one geographic part of the city, based on the males’ residences. However, through interviews conducted by the Disease Intervention Specialists (DIS), the STD officials learned that most of the males socialized in the same area. ACTIONS TAKEN A DIS was already screening sporadically at a gay bar. To address this emerging problem, STD officials initiated meetings with six community-based organizations (CBOs) that work with the MSM community. Together, they designed a plan of action to implement jointly. One of the activities implemented was syphilis screening in different venues (i.e., bathhouses, gay bars, CBOs, mobile unit, and a gay parade). The STD director and program staff were interested in determining which of these screening approaches was more successful in reaching the target population. The following illustrates the steps involved in designing and implementing this evaluation.
    [Show full text]
  • Lekking Mating Systems Monogamy
    Petrie et al. 1991 Lekking •Black Grouse •Yearly variation in lek sites 120 years after Darwin suggested female From Scandinavian word ‘lek’ for “play” choice could maintain elaborate plumage: Evidence in support of Hot Spot: Males defend small territories of no resource value •Multiple species lekking near river confluences First demonstration of female preference •Typically clumped in a small display area for elaborate plumage in males. Females arrive there solely for finding mates Evidence against female preference hypothesis: •Uganda kob (an antelope that leks) Underlying Theory: Why do this? Bradbury’s hypothesis •Operational Sex Ratio across leks is fairly •Intersexual Selection •Should be favored in species with wide-ranging constant Specific Hypotheses foraging ecology 1. Female mate choice depends on male plumage •Unpredictable, temporally variable food However, as with all things ecological: train characteristics (intersexual sel’n hyp.) versus sources (tropical fruits ripening at different Depends heavily on the species. 2. Certain plumage train characteristics confer a times on different trees) •Ruffs (type of sandpiper) exhibit competitive advantage to males (intrasexual sel’n behavior supporting all three hypothesis) Big Question: Why do males congregate in small areas? hypotheses Not mutually exclusive hypotheses •Three Hypotheses: •Located near small ponds on elevated ground •“Hot Spot” hypothesis •Females prefer groups with at least 5 displayers Previous Studies (Two) •“Hot Shot” hypothesis •Low-ranking males choose to display near •Experimental manipulations •Female preference hypothesis dominant males •Demo’d increased mating success but didn’t clearly document the mechanism Evidence for “Hot Shot” •Great snipes (European sandpipers) Observational Study •Removal of dominant males caused desertion •One lek at Whipsnade Zoological Park (England) by nearby subordinates •Removal of subordinates created rapidly-filled vacancies Back to Peacocks..
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Gay and Lesbian Hall of Fame 2001
    CHICAGO GAY AND LESBIAN HALL OF FAME 2001 City of Chicago Commission on Human Relations Richard M. Daley Clarence N. Wood Mayor Chair/Commissioner Advisory Council on Gay and Lesbian Issues William W. Greaves Laura A. Rissover Director/Community Liaison Chairperson Ó 2001 Hall of Fame Committee. All rights reserved. COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST City of Chicago Commission on Human Relations Advisory Council on Gay and Lesbian Issues 740 North Sedgwick Street, 3rd Floor Chicago, Illinois 60610 312.744.7911 (VOICE) 312.744.1088 (CTT/TDD) Www.GLHallofFame.org 1 2 3 CHICAGO GAY AND LESBIAN HALL OF FAME The Chicago Gay and Lesbian Hall of Fame is both a historic event and an exhibit. Through the Hall of Fame, residents of Chicago and our country are made aware of the contributions of Chicago's lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered (LGBT) communities and the communities’ efforts to eradicate homophobic bias and discrimination. With the support of the City of Chicago Commission on Human Relations, the Advisory Council on Gay and Lesbian Issues established the Chicago Gay and Lesbian Hall of Fame in June 1991. The inaugural induction ceremony took place during Pride Week at City Hall, hosted by Mayor Richard M. Daley. This was the first event of its kind in the country. The Hall of Fame recognizes the volunteer and professional achievements of people of the LGBT communities, their organizations, and their friends, as well as their contributions to their communities and to the city of Chicago. This is a unique tribute to dedicated individuals and organizations whose services have improved the quality of life for all of Chicago's citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • From Romantic Jealousy to Sympathetic Joy: Monogamy, Polyamory, and Beyond Jorge N
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by California Institute of Integral Studies libraries Digital Commons @ CIIS International Journal of Transpersonal Studies Advance Publication Archive 2019 From Romantic Jealousy to Sympathetic Joy: Monogamy, Polyamory, and Beyond Jorge N. Ferrer Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.ciis.edu/advance-archive Part of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Philosophy Commons, Religion Commons, and the Transpersonal Psychology Commons From Romantic Jealousy to Sympathetic Joy: Monogamy, Polyamory, and Beyond Jorge N. Ferrer. Cailornia Institute of Integral Studies San Francisco, CA, USA This paper explores how the extension of contemplative qualities to intimate relationships can transform human sexual/emotional responses and relationship choices. The paper reviews contemporary findings from the field of evolutionary psychology on the twin origins of jealousy and monogamy, argues for the possibility to transform jealousy into sympathetic joy (or compersion), addresses the common objections against polyamory (or nonmonogamy), and challenges the culturally prevalent belief that the only spiritually correct sexual options are either celibacy or (lifelong or serial) monogamy. To conclude, it is suggested that the cultivation of sympathetic joy in intimate bonds can pave the way to overcome the problematic dichotomy between monogamy and polyamory, grounding individuals in a radical openness to the dynamic unfolding of life
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Gay and Straight Men and Their Utilization of the Bar Scene
    Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Masters Theses & Specialist Projects Graduate School 5-2015 Meet Me at the Bar? A Comparison of Gay and Straight Men and Their tU ilization of The aB r Scene Jasmine M. Routon Western Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses Part of the Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, and the Gender and Sexuality Commons Recommended Citation Routon, Jasmine M., "Meet Me at the Bar? A Comparison of Gay and Straight Men and Their tU ilization of The aB r Scene" (2015). Masters Theses & Specialist Projects. Paper 1470. http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/1470 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses & Specialist Projects by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MEET ME AT THE BAR? A COMPARISON OF GAY AND STRAIGHT MEN AND THEIR UTILIZATION OF THE BAR SCENE A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Sociology Western Kentucky University Bowling Green, Kentucky In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree Master of Arts By Jasmine M. Routon May 2015 I dedicate this thesis to my best friend, Brant Weiss, who continues to motivate and inspire me. We have shared many conversations concerning life, love, sexuality and many other beautiful disasters that have all contributed to my research interests. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I would like to acknowledge my thesis chair, Donielle Lovell, who has been a mentor to me since my undergraduate years.
    [Show full text]
  • A Grounded Theory of How Mixed Orientation Married
    “Making it Work”: A Grounded Theory of How Mixed Orientation Married Couples Commit, Sexually Identify, and Gender Themselves Christian Edward Jordal Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Human Development Katherine R. Allen April L. Few-Demo Christine E. Kaestle Margaret L. Keeling April 27, 2011 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Bisexuality; gender; marital commitment; mixed orientation marriage Abstract Married bisexuals who come out to their heterosexual partners do not invariably divorce. This qualitative study included 14 intact, mixed orientation married couples. The mean marriage duration was 14.5 years, and the mean time since the bisexual spouse had come out was 7.9 years. The research focused the negotiation processes around three constructs: (a) sexual identity; (b) gender identity; and (c) marital commitment. Dyadic interviews were used to generate a grounded theory of the identity and commitment negotiation processes occurring among intact mixed orientation married couples. The findings revealed two sexual identity trajectories: Bisexuals who identify before marriage and reemerge within marriage; or bisexuals who do not identity before marriage but who emerge from within marriage. Two gender identity processes were reported: gender non-conformity and deliberate gender conformity. Finally, two negotiation processes around marital commitment were found: (a) closed marital commitment, and (b) open marital commitment. Closed marital commitment was defined as monogamous. Open marital commitment had four subtypes: (a) monogamous with the option to open; (b) open on one side (i.e., the bisexual spouse was or had the option to establish a tertiary relationship outside the marriage); (c) open on both sides or polyamorous; and (d) third-person inclusive (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • About Outing: Public Discourse, Private Lives
    Washington University Law Review Volume 73 Issue 4 January 1995 About Outing: Public Discourse, Private Lives Katheleen Guzman University of Oklahoma Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Part of the First Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Katheleen Guzman, About Outing: Public Discourse, Private Lives, 73 WASH. U. L. Q. 1531 (1995). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol73/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABOUT OUTING: PUBLIC DISCOURSE, PRIVATE LIVES KATHELEEN GUZMAN* Out of sight, out of mind. We're here. We're Queer. Get used to it. You made your bed. Now lie in it.' I. INTRODUCTION "Outing" is the forced exposure of a person's same-sex orientation. While techniques used to achieve this end vary,2 the most visible examples of outing are employed by gay activists in publications such as The Advocate or OutWeek,4 where ostensibly, names are published to advance a rights agenda. Outing is not, however, confined to fringe media. The mainstream press has joined the fray, immortalizing in print "the love[r] that dare[s] not speak its name."' The rules of outing have changed since its national emergence in the early 1990s. As recently as March of 1995, the media forced a relatively unknown person from the closet.6 The polemic engendered by outing * Associate Professor of Law, University of Oklahoma College of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Compulsory Monogamy and Polyamorous Existence Elizabeth Emens
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers Working Papers 2004 Monogamy's Law: Compulsory Monogamy and Polyamorous Existence Elizabeth Emens Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/ public_law_and_legal_theory Part of the Law Commons Chicago Unbound includes both works in progress and final versions of articles. Please be aware that a more recent version of this article may be available on Chicago Unbound, SSRN or elsewhere. Recommended Citation Elizabeth Emens, "Monogamy's Law: Compulsory Monogamy and Polyamorous Existence" (University of Chicago Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper No. 58, 2004). This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Working Papers at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHICAGO PUBLIC LAW AND LEGAL THEORY WORKING PAPER NO. 58 MONOGAMY’S LAW: COMPULSORY MONOGAMY AND POLYAMOROUS EXISTENCE Elizabeth F. Emens THE LAW SCHOOL THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO February 2003 This paper can be downloaded without charge at http://www.law.uchicago.edu/academics/publiclaw/index.html and at The Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection: http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=506242 1 MONOGAMY’S LAW: COMPULSORY MONOGAMY AND POLYAMOROUS EXISTENCE 29 N.Y.U. REVIEW OF LAW & SOCIAL CHANGE (forthcoming 2004) Elizabeth F. Emens† Work-in-progress: Please do not cite or quote without the author’s permission. I. INTRODUCTION II. COMPULSORY MONOGAMY A. MONOGAMY’S MANDATE 1. THE WESTERN ROMANCE TRADITION 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Invisible Lesbian: the Creation and Maintenance of Quiet Queer Space and the Social Power of Lesbian Bartenders
    THE INVISIBLE LESBIAN: THE CREATION AND MAINTENANCE OF QUIET QUEER SPACE AND THE SOCIAL POWER OF LESBIAN BARTENDERS A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Sociology Colorado College In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Bachelor of Arts in Sociology By Kathleen Hallgren May/2012 ABSTRACT Despite extensive scholarship exploring relationships between space, gender, and sexuality, little attention has been given to lesbian/queer subjects in everyday heterosexual spaces such as bars. Furthermore, there is an absence of work addressing the bartender as a social actor. This research confronts those gaps by examining the social power of lesbian bartenders in straight bars to facilitate lesbian networks, and to cultivate and maintain “quiet queer spaces”—structurally heterosexual and socially heteronormative spaces that temporarily and covertly double as safe spaces for queer populations. By drawing on previous scholarship, and conducting a primary investigation through interviews and observations, I examine the creation and maintenance of quiet queer spaces in Colorado Springs bars to conclude that quiet queer spaces are both present and necessary in lesbian networks. I specifically examine the position of the lesbian bartender in straight bars as one of unique social power, essential in the creation and identification of quiet queer space. 2 After living in Colorado Springs for nearly four years, I could almost have been convinced that I was the only lesbian1 in the city. Beyond the campus of the city’s small liberal arts college, I saw no evidence of queer populations. This is curious, given recent studies2 that suggest one in every ten Americans is gay.
    [Show full text]
  • Counseling the Polyamorous Client: Implications for Competent Practice
    fSuggested APA style reference information can be found at http://www.counseling.org/knowledge-center/vistas Article 50 Counseling the Polyamorous Client: Implications for Competent Practice Adrianne L. Johnson Johnson, Adrianne L., is an Assistant Professor of Clinical Mental Health Counseling at Wright State University. Her experience includes adult outpatient, crisis, college, and rehabilitation counseling. She has presented internationally on a broad range of counseling and counselor education topics, and her research interests include bias and diversity in counseling and counselor education. Abstract The self-reports of polyamorous clients regarding therapeutic experiences raise concerns for the counseling field. Many poly individuals are not receiving quality mental health care or relationship counseling because of valid fears regarding professional bias and condemnation of their lifestyle choices. The unique issues and concerns of polyamorous clients is an emerging interest in the mental health field and counselors have an ethical obligation to understand, explore, and address the unique needs of this population. Introduction The current culture in the United States has historically promoted heterosexual monogamy as the most widely accepted and advocated ethical/moral relationship option available, and clients identifying as polyamorous often practice covertly and with great stress “due to the cultural pressure, social stigmas, or fear of legal ramifications” (Black, 2006, p. 1). Polyamory is a lifestyle in which a person may have more than one romantic relationship with consent and support expressed for this choice by each of the people concerned (Weitzman, 2006, p. 139). Polyamorous people face stigmatization, stereotypes, negative bias, and marginalization in both the mainstream society and in the offices of counseling professionals.
    [Show full text]
  • Nostalgia, Utopia, and Desire in the New York Lesbian Bar
    Vassar College Digital Window @ Vassar Senior Capstone Projects 2019 “It’s your future, don’t miss it”: nostalgia, utopia, and desire in the New York lesbian bar Zoe Wennerholm Vassar College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalwindow.vassar.edu/senior_capstone Recommended Citation Wennerholm, Zoe, "“It’s your future, don’t miss it”: nostalgia, utopia, and desire in the New York lesbian bar" (2019). Senior Capstone Projects. 897. https://digitalwindow.vassar.edu/senior_capstone/897 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Window @ Vassar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of Digital Window @ Vassar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “It’s Your Future, Don’t Miss It”: Nostalgia, Utopia, and Desire in the New York Lesbian Bar Zoe Wennerholm April 26, 2019 Senior Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Bachelor of Arts in Urban Studies ________________________ Advisor, Lisa Brawley Table of Contents Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………….3 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………….4 Chapter 1: History: A Brief Review of Lesbian Bars in the 20th and 21st Century American Urban Landscape……………………………………………………………………………9 Chapter 2: Loss: Lesbian Bar Closings and Their Affective Reverberations………………29 Chapter 3: Desire: The Lesbian Bar in the Queer Imaginary……………………………….47 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………….52 References Cited……………………………………………………………………………55 Appendix 1: Interview with Gwen Shockey…………………………………………………60 Appendix 2: Timeline of New York Lesbian Bars…………………………………………73 2 Acknowledgements I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Professor Lisa Brawley, whose guidance and encouragement always came at exactly the right time. My heartfelt thanks also goes to Gwen Shockey, whose enthusiasm and willingness to speak with a naïve young dyke made me feel understood and inspired.
    [Show full text]