Gay Men Married to Straight Women Kevin John Zimmerman Iowa State University

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gay Men Married to Straight Women Kevin John Zimmerman Iowa State University Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2013 Maintaining commitment in long-lasting mixed- orientation relationships: Gay men married to straight women Kevin John Zimmerman Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, and the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Studies Commons Recommended Citation Zimmerman, Kevin John, "Maintaining commitment in long-lasting mixed-orientation relationships: Gay men married to straight women" (2013). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 13464. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/13464 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. i Maintaining commitment in long-lasting mixed-orientation relationships: Gay men married to straight women by Kevin J. Zimmerman A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major: Human Development and Family Studies Program of Study Committee: Timothy Griesdorn, Co-major Professor Susan Stewart, Co-major Professor Carolyn Cutrona Clinton Gudmunson Anthony Santiago Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2013 Copyright © Kevin J. Zimmerman, 2013. All rights reserved. ii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to the couples who let me into their lives by being willing to talk with me, a stranger to them, about some of the most intimate and personal aspects of their lives. They gave a couple hours of their lives to contribute to this research, and I spent many days with their words as I transcribed, read, analyzed, interpreted, reported, and discussed their stories. Although each story is unique, I have learned a great deal about the nature of successful, long-lasting, mixed-orientation relationships, and I hope that the insights that I have gained and discuss herein can in some measure recompense my participants for their willing involvement in this study. I also dedicate this dissertation to mixed-orientation couples. May your closest relationships be filled with authenticity and love. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES........................................................................................................................ vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................................... viii ABSTRACT................................................................................................................................... iv CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION Background and Context..................................................................................................... 1 Statement of Purpose and Research Questions................................................................... 3 Assumptions........................................................................................................................ 4 The Researcher.................................................................................................................... 5 Rationale and Significance ................................................................................................. 7 Definitions of Terminology ................................................................................................ 8 CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW Overview........................................................................................................................... 10 Mixed-Orientation Relationships...................................................................................... 11 Reasons for Entering the Relationship.................................................................. 11 Protective Factors.................................................................................................. 12 Challenges to the Relationship.............................................................................. 15 Studies of Couples ................................................................................................ 17 Theory & Models.............................................................................................................. 23 Social Exchange Theory ....................................................................................... 24 Commitment Models ............................................................................................ 27 Queer Theory ........................................................................................................ 31 Summary........................................................................................................................... 32 CHAPTER 3. METHODOLOGY Overview........................................................................................................................... 33 Rationale for Qualitative Research Design....................................................................... 33 Rationale for a Phenomenological Approach ................................................................... 34 Overview of Research Design .......................................................................................... 35 IRB approval......................................................................................................... 36 Sampling procedure .............................................................................................. 36 Data collection methods........................................................................................ 39 Methods of data analysis and synthesis ................................................................ 43 Ethical Considerations ...................................................................................................... 46 Trustworthiness................................................................................................................. 47 Limitations of the Research Design.................................................................................. 51 Chapter Summary ............................................................................................................. 52 CHAPTER 4. RESULTS The Couples ...................................................................................................................... 53 Overall Participant Characteristics ................................................................................... 59 iv Overview of the Findings.................................................................................................. 65 Finding 1—Reasons for Marriage .................................................................................... 70 Love for Spouse .................................................................................................... 70 Clicked ...................................................................................................... 71 Physical Attraction.................................................................................... 71 Personality................................................................................................. 73 Common Interests ..................................................................................... 74 Finding 2—Coming Out ................................................................................................... 75 Gay Identity Development.................................................................................... 75 Bisexuality as a Transition to Gay Identity............................................... 77 Pornography.............................................................................................. 78 Sex with Men ............................................................................................ 79 Turmoil Pre-Disclosure......................................................................................... 80 Sense of Relief ...................................................................................................... 82 Wives’ Emotional Reactions to Coming Out........................................................ 83 Fear of Abandonment ............................................................................... 84 Acceptance............................................................................................................ 85 Turning Points........................................................................................... 86 Finding 3—Strengths of the Relationship......................................................................... 90 Love for Partner .................................................................................................... 90 Love for Relationship ........................................................................................... 92 Sources of Support................................................................................................ 95 Family ....................................................................................................... 95 Friends....................................................................................................... 97 Online.....................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • I Non-Binary Speech, Race, and Non-Normative Gender
    Non-binary speech, race, and non-normative gender: Sociolinguistic style beyond the binary Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Ariana June Steele, B.A. Linguistics Graduate Program The Ohio State University 2019 Thesis Committee: Kathryn Campbell-Kibler, Adviser Cynthia Clopper i Copyright by Ariana June Steele 2019 ii Abstract Non-binary speech is understudied in the realm of sociolinguistics. Previous studies on non- binary speech (Kirtley 2015; Gratton 2016; Jas 2018) suggest that non-binary speakers are able to make use of linguistic variables that have been tied to binary gender in novel ways, often dependent on social context and goals, though these studies are limited in scope, considering eight or feWer non-binary talkers in their studies. Research into sociolinguistic style (Eckert 2008; Campbell-Kibler 2011) emphasiZes the ways that multiple linguistic and extralinguistic variables can be employed simultaneously to construct coherent styles, leaving room for speaker race to be included in the stylistic context (Pharao et al. 2014). Zimman’s (2017) study on transmasculine speakers showed that speakers can employ binary gendered linguistic variables in speech styles to position themselves towards or against normative binary gender. The current study considers how tWenty non-binary speakers, stratified by sex assigned at birth and race, use /s/ and f0, variables which tied to gender in previous research, alongside clothing to construct non-binary gendered styles. Results further support that race is an important construct in understanding gendered speech, as Black non-binary speakers produce /s/ differently with respect to self-identified masculinity than do white non-binary speakers.
    [Show full text]
  • Men's Endorsement of Monogamy: the Role of Gendered Relationship
    Men’s Endorsement of Monogamy: The Role of Gendered Relationship Scripts on Beliefs about Committed Relationships, Love, and Romance by Amy Catherine Moors A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Psychology and Women’s Studies) in The University of Michigan 2015 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Terri D. Conley, Chair Assistant Professor Allison N. Earl Associate Professor Robin S. Edelstein Professor Deborah Keller-Cohen © Amy C. Moors 2015 DEDICATION To Susan J. Moors and Richard J. Moors for both of your unwavering support, encouragement, and optimism since 1984. And, to Daniel Ethan Gosnell for your sage advice, smiling face, and willingness to move from the east coast to the midwest. You’re my dreamboat. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I have received support, advice, mentorship, and encouragement from a great number of individuals. I would have ended up on a different path if it was not for my undergraduate mentors at William Paterson University: Katherine Makarec, Elizabeth Haines, Neil Kressel, Jan Pinkston, and Bruce Diamond. I would also like to thank Thomas Toppino for his mentorship and passing down his careful empirical eye to me during my time at Villanova University. My dissertation committee of Terri Conley (my advisor), Robin Edelstein, Debby Keller-Cohen, and Ali Earl have provided me with excellent support and constructive critique as I moved from ideas to completed studies. I am truly grateful for this all-star committee. In addition, Terri, Robin, and Abby Stewart have been deeply influential throughout my six years of training; I have grown in all aspects of scholarship from them.
    [Show full text]
  • Asexuality 101
    BY THE NUMBERS Asexual people (or aces) experience little or no 28% sexual attraction. While most asexual people desire emotionally intimate relationships, they are not drawn to sex as a way to express that intimacy. of the community is 18 or younger ASEXUALITY ISN’T ACES MIGHT 32% Abstinence because of Want friendship, a bad relationship understanding, and Abstinence because of empathy religious reasons Fall in love of the community are between 19 and 21 Celibacy Experience arousal and Sexual repression, orgasm aversion, or Masturbate 19% dysfunction Have sex Loss of libido due to Not have sex age or circumstance Be of any gender, age, Fear of intimacy or background of the community are currently Inability to find a Have a spouse and/or in high school partner children 40% of the community are in college Aromantic – people who experience little or no romantic 20% attraction and are content with close friendships and other non-romantic relationships. Demisexual – people who only experience sexual attraction of the community identify as once they form a strong emotional connection with the person. transgender or are questioning Grey-A – people who identify somewhere between sexual and their gender identity asexual on the sexuality spectrum. 41% Queerplatonic – One type of non-romantic relationship where there is an intense emotional connection going beyond what is traditionally thought of as friendship. Romantic orientations – Aces commonly use hetero-, homo-, of the community identify as part of the LGBT community bi-, and pan- in front of the word romantic to describe who they experience romantic attraction to. Source: Asexy Community Census http://www.tinyurl.com/AsexyCensusResults Asexual Awareness Week Community Engagement Series – Trevor Project | Last Updated April 2012 ACE SPECIFIC Feeling e mpty, isolated, Some aces voice a fear of ISSUES and/or alone.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Rise and Decline of Wulitou 无厘头's Popularity in China
    The Act of Seeing and the Narrative: On the Rise and Decline of Wulitou 无厘头’s Popularity in China Inaugural dissertation to complete the doctorate from the Faculty of Arts and Humanities of the University of Cologne in the subject Chinese Studies presented by Wen Zhang ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My thanks go to my supervisors, Prof. Dr. Stefan Kramer, Prof. Dr. Weiping Huang, and Prof. Dr. Brigitte Weingart for their support and encouragement. Also to the Faculty of Arts and Humanities of the University of Cologne for providing me with the opportunity to undertake this research. Last but not least, I want to thank my friends Thorsten Krämer, James Pastouna and Hung-min Krämer for reviewing this dissertation and for their valuable comments. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 1 0.1 Wulitou as a Popular Style of Narrative in China ........................................................... 1 0.2 Story, Narrative and Schema ................................................................................................. 3 0.3 The Deconstruction of Schema in Wulitou Narratives ................................................... 5 0.4 The Act of Seeing and the Construction of Narrative .................................................... 7 0.5 The Rise of the Internet and Wulitou Narrative .............................................................. 8 0.6 Wulitou Narrative and Chinese Native Cultural Context ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Guide: Helping Families to Support Their LGBT Children
    A PrActitioner’s resource Guide: Helping Families to Support Their LGBT Children ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A Practitioner’s Resource Guide: Helping Families to Support Their LGBT Children was prepared by Caitlin Ryan, PhD, ACSW, Director of the Family Acceptance Project at San Francisco State University under contract number HHSP233201200519P for SAMHSA, HHS. DISCLAIMER The views, opinions, and content of this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or policies of SAMHSA or HHS. PUBLIC DOMAIN NOTICE All materials appearing in this publication are in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied with- out permission from SAMHSA. Citation of the source is appreciated. The publication may not be repro- duced or distributed for a fee without the specific, written authorization of the Office of Communications, SAMHSA. ELECTRONIC ACCESS This publication may be downloaded or ordered at http://store.samhsa.gov/. Or call SAMHSA at 1-877-SAMHSA-7 (1-877-726-4727) (English and Español). RECOMMENDED CITATION Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, A Practitioner’s Resource Guide: Helping Families to Support Their LGBT Children. HHS Publication No. PEP14-LGBTKIDS. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2014. Table of Contents Introduction 2 Critical Role of Families in Reducing Risk & Promoting Well-Being 4 Helping Families Decrease Risk & Increase Well-Being for Their LGBT Children 8 Increasing Family Support: How to Help Right Now 11 Resources for Practitioners and Families 12 Endnotes 13 References 14 Introduction ince the early 1990s, young people have increasingly their LGBT children. So few practitioners tried to engage or been coming out or identifying as lesbian, gay, and work with these families (Ryan & Chen-Hayes, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practice Highlights
    Best Practice Highlights Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and people who may be questioning their sexual orientation or sexual identity (LGBTQ) Prepared by Robert Paul Cabaj, M.D. The LGBTQ Population There really is no single LGBTQ community, rather a very diverse population that comes from all racial, ethnic, cultural, socioeconomic, and geographic backgrounds. People who are LGBTQ may move to urban areas, if they can, where there may be a sense of greater acceptance and personal safety. It is very difficult to know the percentage of people who identify as LGBTQ. Stigma and the fear of biases contribute to an underreporting of actual sexual orientation. Some people may also self-identify one way even if their internal desires or sexual behavior imply a different orientation. Identify issues may be especially pronounced for LBGTQ people from particular racial and ethnic minority groups. Significant History – Events which influenced the community and contextualize assessment and treatment Understanding the history of the LGBTQ community both in American society and within the profession of psychiatry is essential in bringing context to treatment. Some major milestones have contributed to the civil rights of LGBTQ people and to greater acceptance. First, the Stonewall riots of 1969 have become the historic launching point for gay rights. In 2003, the Supreme Count struck down sodomy laws across the county with their decision in Lawrence vs. Texas. In 2013, the Supreme Court decision on United States vs. Windsor led to the same sex couple being allowed to share the same federal benefits as opposite sex couples, ending the Defense of Marriage Act.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lived Experience of Monogamy Among Gay Men in Monogamous Relationships
    Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2020 The Lived Experience of Monogamy Among Gay Men in Monogamous Relationships Kellie L. Barton Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Clinical Psychology Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Walden University College of Social and Behavioral Sciences This is to certify that the doctoral dissertation by Kellie Barton has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Chet Lesniak, Committee Chairperson, Psychology Faculty Dr. Scott Friedman, Committee Member, Psychology Faculty Dr. Susan Marcus, University Reviewer, Psychology Faculty Chief Academic Officer and Provost Sue Subocz, Ph.D. Walden University 2020 Abstract The Lived Experience of Monogamy Among Gay Men in Monogamous Relationships by Kellie Barton MS, Walden University, 2012 BS, University of Phoenix, 2010 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Clinical Psychology Walden University February 2020 Abstract Research on male gay relationships spans more than 50 years, and the focus of most of this research has been on understanding the development processes, consequences, and risk factors of nonmonogamous relationships. Few researchers have explored the nature and meaning of monogamy in the male gay community.
    [Show full text]
  • Sex with Guilt
    Review Sex With Guilt James A. Brundage. Law, Sex, and Christian Society in Medieval Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987. Pp. xxiv, 674. $45.00. Paul Freedman Medieval law was an accretion of traditions from several sources. This is well known, for example, with regard to the historical development of English Common Law. Continental and church law of the Middle Ages was built on a foundation of Roman or Roman-inspired codes and prac- tices and so tended to emphasize statute and authoritative executive state- ments more than did customary laws. In both its political government and legislation the medieval church was increasingly centralized. Nevertheless, even the church faced the task of reconciling diverse norms and precedents (Biblical, Patristic, Roman, Germanic) that reflected conflicting proce- dures and social expectations. One might expect medieval canon law relat- ing to sexual behavior to have been straightforward and unyielding, but this is not the case. Because of the interaction of ethical and textual tradi- tions, and the nature of medieval society (which was rather more exuber- ant than is commonly believed), the development of ecclesiastical regula- tion was slow and complex. The Middle Ages was hardly unique in attempting to control the mani- festations of sexual desire. All societies have both informal expectations and formal rules about sex and marriage. Where they differ, often radi- cally, is in marking off aspects of sexual and domestic relations considered private and thus left to individual conscience or preference from those sub- Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, Vol. 1, Iss. 2 [1989], Art. 5 Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities [Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Patricia Highsmith's Queer Disruption: Subverting Gay Tragedy in the 1950S
    Patricia Highsmith’s Queer Disruption: Subverting Gay Tragedy in the 1950s By Charlotte Findlay A thesis submitted to Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in English Literature Victoria University of Wellington 2019 ii iii Contents Acknowledgements ………………………………………………………………..……………..iv Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………v Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..1 1: Rejoicing in Evil: Queer Ambiguity and Amorality in The Talented Mr Ripley …………..…14 2: “Don’t Do That in Public”: Finding Space for Lesbians in The Price of Salt…………………44 Conclusion ...…………………………………………………………………………………….80 Works Cited …………..…………………………………………………………………………83 iv Acknowledgements Thanks to my supervisor, Jane Stafford, for providing always excellent advice, for helping me clarify my ideas by pointing out which bits of my drafts were in fact good, and for making the whole process surprisingly painless. Thanks to Mum and Tony, for keeping me functional for the last few months (I am sure all the salad improved my writing immensely.) And last but not least, thanks to the ladies of 804 for the support, gossip, pad thai, and niche literary humour I doubt anybody else would appreciate. I hope your year has been as good as mine. v Abstract Published in a time when tragedy was pervasive in gay literature, Patricia Highsmith’s 1952 novel The Price of Salt, published later as Carol, was the first lesbian novel with a happy ending. It was unusual for depicting lesbians as sympathetic, ordinary women, whose sexuality did not consign them to a life of misery. The novel criticises how 1950s American society worked to suppress lesbianism and women’s agency. It also refuses to let that suppression succeed by giving its lesbian couple a future together.
    [Show full text]
  • Art. Music. Games. Life. 16 09
    ART. MUSIC. GAMES. LIFE. 16 09 03 Editor’s Letter 27 04 Disposed Media Gaming 06 Wishlist 07 BigLime 08 Freeware 09 Sonic Retrospective 10 Alexander Brandon 12 Deus Ex: Invisible War 20 14 Game Reviews Music 16 Kylie Showgirl Tour 18 Kylie Retrospective 20 Varsity Drag 22 Good/Bad: Radio 1 23 Doormat 25 Music Reviews Film & TV 32 27 Dexter 29 Film Reviews Comics 31 Death Of Captain Marvel 32 Blankets 34 Comic Reviews Gallery 36 Andrew Campbell 37 Matthew Plater 38 Laura Copeland 39 Next Issue… Publisher/Production Editor Tim Cheesman Editor Dan Thornton Deputy Editor Ian Moreno-Melgar Art Editor Andrew Campbell Sub Editor/Designer Rachel Wild Contributors Keith Andrew/Dan Gassis/Adam Parker/James Hamilton/Paul Blakeley/Andrew Revell Illustrators James Downing/Laura Copeland Cover Art Matthew Plater [© Disposable Media 2007. // All images and characters are retained by original company holding.] dm6/editor’s letter as some bloke once mumbled. “The times, they are You may have spotted a new name at the bottom of this a-changing” column, as I’ve stepped into the hefty shoes and legacy of former Editor Andrew Revell. But luckily, fans of ‘Rev’ will be happy to know he’s still contributing his prosaic genius, and now he actually gets time to sleep in between issues. If my undeserved promotion wasn’t enough, we’re also happy to announce a new bi-monthly schedule for DM. Natural disasters and Acts of God not withstanding. And if that isn’t enough to rock you to the very foundations of your soul, we’re also putting the finishing touches to a newDisposable Media website.
    [Show full text]
  • Lekking Mating Systems Monogamy
    Petrie et al. 1991 Lekking •Black Grouse •Yearly variation in lek sites 120 years after Darwin suggested female From Scandinavian word ‘lek’ for “play” choice could maintain elaborate plumage: Evidence in support of Hot Spot: Males defend small territories of no resource value •Multiple species lekking near river confluences First demonstration of female preference •Typically clumped in a small display area for elaborate plumage in males. Females arrive there solely for finding mates Evidence against female preference hypothesis: •Uganda kob (an antelope that leks) Underlying Theory: Why do this? Bradbury’s hypothesis •Operational Sex Ratio across leks is fairly •Intersexual Selection •Should be favored in species with wide-ranging constant Specific Hypotheses foraging ecology 1. Female mate choice depends on male plumage •Unpredictable, temporally variable food However, as with all things ecological: train characteristics (intersexual sel’n hyp.) versus sources (tropical fruits ripening at different Depends heavily on the species. 2. Certain plumage train characteristics confer a times on different trees) •Ruffs (type of sandpiper) exhibit competitive advantage to males (intrasexual sel’n behavior supporting all three hypothesis) Big Question: Why do males congregate in small areas? hypotheses Not mutually exclusive hypotheses •Three Hypotheses: •Located near small ponds on elevated ground •“Hot Spot” hypothesis •Females prefer groups with at least 5 displayers Previous Studies (Two) •“Hot Shot” hypothesis •Low-ranking males choose to display near •Experimental manipulations •Female preference hypothesis dominant males •Demo’d increased mating success but didn’t clearly document the mechanism Evidence for “Hot Shot” •Great snipes (European sandpipers) Observational Study •Removal of dominant males caused desertion •One lek at Whipsnade Zoological Park (England) by nearby subordinates •Removal of subordinates created rapidly-filled vacancies Back to Peacocks..
    [Show full text]
  • Elections at the Conference
    36th European Conference of the International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association 18th ILGA-Europe conference Riga, 9 October – 11 October 2014 Organised in association with the Rīga organising committee ILGA-Europe Conference 2014 ELECTIONS AT THE CONFERENCE This document consists of the following information: 1. Presentation of the candidates to ILGA-Europe and ILGA Boards 2. Explanation of the election procedures for ILGA-Europe Board 3. Explanation of the election procedures for ILGA Board 4. Presentation of the candidate for the host venue for the 2016 ILGA-Europe conference 1. Candidates to ILGA-Europe and ILGA Boards Below is the list of candidates for the ILGA-Europe Board. Their nominations and election statements are attached at the end of this document. The election procedures are explained in the separate document ‘Guide to elections’ included in this mailing. Name Organisation Country Identifying as Agata Chaber Kampania Przeciw Homofobii Poland Gender – Campaign Against neutral / Homophobia (KPH) trans Magali Deval Commission LGBT – Europe France F Ecologie – Les Verts (LGBT committee – French Greens) ELECTIONS AT THE CONFERENCE – THIRD MAILING (Riga) Darienne UNISON National LGBT UK F Flemington Committee Costa Gavrielides Accept – LGBT Cyprus Cyprus M Joyce Hamilton COC Netherland Netherlands F Henrik Hynkemejer LGBT Denmark, The Danish Denmark M National Organisation for Gay Men, Lesbians, Bisexuals and Transgender persons. Konstantina OLKE (Lesbian and Gay Greece F Kosmidou Community of Greece) Brian Sheehan Gay & Lesbian Equality Ireland M Network (GLEN) Below is the list of candidates for the ILGA Board. Their nominations and election statements are attached at the end of this document.
    [Show full text]