DOCSLIB.ORG

Masarykova Univerzita Filozofická Fakulta

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Masarykova Univerzita Filozofická Fakulta Masarykova univerzita Filozofická fakulta Seminář dějin umění Katarína Kravčíková The Church of Hagia Eirene in Constantinople Chrám Hagia Eirene v Konstantinopoli Bakalářská diplomová práce Vedoucí práce: doc. Ivan Foletti, MA 2016 1 Prehlasujem, že som diplomovú prácu vypracovala samostatne s využitím uvedených prameňov a literatúry. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. 2 In this point, I would like to express how much indebted I am to my beloved family, friends and colleagues for their help and care. Without you, this work would not have been possible. I owe the great debt of gratitude to Veronika and Filip for their charm and readiness; to Adrien and Martin for their attentive suggestions, advice and time; to Poma and Michal for their loving support, patience and discussions and to Emrecan for the invaluable photographs and jokes. I am also very grateful to Kateřina, Matej and Zuzana for their keenness and careful corrections. I would like to thank to head of the Department Ondřej Jakubec, for his patience and goodwill to give me as much time as I needed. And finally, I would like to express my humble and sincere gratitude to Ivan Foletti. First, as to the supervisor of this thesis for his counsel and guidance, but above all, for providing me with an incredible amount of support, care and nicknames ever since we first met. Thank you. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. State of Research ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 THE FIRST MODERN STUDIES............................................................................................................................... 6 THE 20th CENTURY ................................................................................................................................................. 8 SPREADING THE INTEREST .................................................................................................................................. 11 THE GOLDEN SIXTIES ........................................................................................................................................... 14 NEW MILLENIUM, NEW QUESTIONS ................................................................................................................. 17 II. Description of the Matter and Chronology .................................................................................................... 19 1. CONSTANTINE THE GREAT AND EIRENE THE OLDEST ........................................................................... 20 2. JUSTINIAN THE GREAT AND EIRENE THE RESSURECTED ...................................................................... 22 I. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................. 22 II. THROUGH THE ATRIUM TO THE NARTHEX .......................................................................................... 24 III. THROUGH THE NARTHEX TO THE NAOS .............................................................................................. 25 IV. A POSSIBLE ELEVATION ............................................................................................................................ 26 V. FURNISHING AND DECORATION ............................................................................................................... 27 3. CONSTANTINE V AND EIRENE THE RENEWED .......................................................................................... 32 I. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................. 32 II. THE RECONCILIATION OF THE 6th AND 8th CENTURIES ...................................................................... 32 III. Word and Image ................................................................................................................................................. 44 IV. Light and Presence ..............................................................................................................................................47 THE PRESENCE ...................................................................................................................................................... 48 THE ABSENCE ........................................................................................................................................................ 50 V. Ecclesia and Peace .................................................................................................................................................54 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................................................... 57 Bibliography ................................................................................................................................................................. 58 List of Illustrations.....................................................................................................................................................67 4 Introduction The church of Hagia Eirene, or Aya İrini as called today in Turkish, stands on the same court of Topkapı Palace as Hagia Sophia, only 120 meters to the north-east. With its origin preceding the official foundation and consecration of the Constantinople itself, Hagia Eirene embodies the fascinating example of an uninterrupted tradition of the sacred place. Naturally, as we are going to observe closely, the building is not preserved neither intact, nor in its original form – what we can see today is from a chronological point of view a multi–layered structure not having any corporeal connection with the very first. However, the real value of Hagia Eirene is not rooted solely in the historicity of the place or material itself – we are dealing with an object which provided a place for crucial historical events, became a model for various churches outside Constantinople, and kept its importance and liturgical function even though splendid Hagia Sophia was built just around the corner. Moreover, its plain interior crowned by the simple cross on the golden mosaic background became a hallmark of the “iconoclastic” era and its approach to religious imagery. The aim of this thesis will be twofold. On one hand, in the introductory part, we would like to offer a synthesis of the previous research, including the remarks to now completely vanished complex of buildings amidst Hagia Eirene and Hagia Sophia. From this sphere of textual evidence alluding to the matter, we will proceed towards the object itself and scrutinize its materiality and chronology. A division of this part into the three chapters according to three benefactors of this church, that is to say Constantine the Great, Justinian I and Constantine V, we have found as a most plausible solution. Within this analysis, apart the description of the architecture, we have decided to deal in a greater extent with a rather marginalized representatives of the former interior decoration, specifically, the capitals of the arcade and remnants of the former fresco decoration. However, what we consider as the essential aspect of the interior and what is going to be stressed the most, is the unique synthronon in the apse. This object and his unusual materiality will lead our attention to the second part of the thesis, which will constitute of three proposed interpretations of the possible rhetoric of this sacred place. The synthronon itself and its capacities will become one of the essential arguments and focal points for the iconography we would like to put forward. 5 I. State of Research THE FIRST MODERN STUDIES If one would like to identify an academic junction amid historical sources referring to the church of Hagia Eirene and the modern historiography after the Fall of Constantinople, the year 1552 could be considered an appropriate starting point. In this year, the fifth century Descriptio Urbis Constantinopolitanae was published as a part of the Notitia1 and informs us in a very concise form about the existence of “Ecclesia Antiqua” along with “Ecclesia Magna” in the Regio II of the capital.2 More than a hundred years later, in 1680, the extensive volume Constantinopolis christiana by French philologist and historian Charles Du Fresne Du Cange was published. Within, under the number XX., in chapter 7 of the 4th book, we can find merely a page dedicated to Hagia Eirene. The author offers us an austere but complete list of direct historical references, several given in full original form together with their Latin transcription.3 After these two rather isolated summaries, we have almost no other mentions until the 19th century. Thus, if we proceed directly to that time, the amount of new textual references will undoubtedly increase. Still, from the 1st half of the century, there is less to deal with – descriptions of Constantinople written by Byzantios,4 Dallaway5 or Konstantinias6 all mention Hagia Eirene but we learn more about the war artefacts and trophies preserved inside than about the building itself. Anyhow, in the case of Dallaway’s Constantinople ancienne et modern, even in just a few lines, the author manages to give us a rather cryptic notion about marble and mosaic decoration: “…elle est embellie de marbre et de mosaiques”.7 Sadly, one can only guess what the exact meaning
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conversion of Kariye Museum to Mosque in Turkey
    Conversion of Kariye Museum to Mosque in Turkey August 24, 2020 A month after turning the iconic Hagia Sophia museum, originally a cathedral, into a mosque, Turkey’s government has decided to convert another Byzantine monument in Istanbul, which has been a museum for over 70 years, into a working mosque. Late last year, the Council of State, the highest administrative court in Turkey, had removed legal hurdles for the Chora (Kariye) museum’s reconversion into a mosque. President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, whose Islamist AK Party has long called for the reconversion of the Ottoman-era mosques that were secularised by Kemalists, signed a decree, transferring the management of the medieval monument to the Directorate of Islamic Affairs. Kariye Museum Originally built in the early 4th century as a chapel outside the city walls of Constantinople built by Constantine the Great, the Chora Church was one of the oldest religious monuments of the Byzantine era and of eastern Orthodox Christianity. It’s believed that the land where the chapel was built was the burial site of Babylas of Antioch, a saint of Eastern Christians, and his disciples. Emperor Justinian I, who built Hagia Sophia during 532-537, reconstructed Chora after the chapel had been ruined by an earthquake. Since then, it has been rebuilt many times. Today’s structure is considered to be at least 1,000 years old. Maria Doukaina, the mother-in-law of Emperor Alexios Komnenos I, launched a renovation project in the 11th century. She rebuilt Chora into the shape of a quincunx, five circles arranged in a cross which was considered a holy shape during the Byzantine era.
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantine Missionaries, Foreign Rulers, and Christian Narratives (Ca
    Conversion and Empire: Byzantine Missionaries, Foreign Rulers, and Christian Narratives (ca. 300-900) by Alexander Borislavov Angelov A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in The University of Michigan 2011 Doctoral Committee: Professor John V.A. Fine, Jr., Chair Professor Emeritus H. Don Cameron Professor Paul Christopher Johnson Professor Raymond H. Van Dam Associate Professor Diane Owen Hughes © Alexander Borislavov Angelov 2011 To my mother Irina with all my love and gratitude ii Acknowledgements To put in words deepest feelings of gratitude to so many people and for so many things is to reflect on various encounters and influences. In a sense, it is to sketch out a singular narrative but of many personal “conversions.” So now, being here, I am looking back, and it all seems so clear and obvious. But, it is the historian in me that realizes best the numerous situations, emotions, and dilemmas that brought me where I am. I feel so profoundly thankful for a journey that even I, obsessed with planning, could not have fully anticipated. In a final analysis, as my dissertation grew so did I, but neither could have become better without the presence of the people or the institutions that I feel so fortunate to be able to acknowledge here. At the University of Michigan, I first thank my mentor John Fine for his tremendous academic support over the years, for his friendship always present when most needed, and for best illustrating to me how true knowledge does in fact produce better humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hagia Sophia in Its Urban Context: an Interpretation of the Transformations of an Architectural Monument with Its Changing Physical and Cultural Environment
    THE HAGIA SOPHIA IN ITS URBAN CONTEXT: AN INTERPRETATION OF THE TRANSFORMATIONS OF AN ARCHITECTURAL MONUMENT WITH ITS CHANGING PHYSICAL AND CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of Engineering and Sciences of İzmir Institute of Technology in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Architecture by Nazlı TARAZ August 2014 İZMİR We approve the thesis of Nazlı TARAZ Examining Committee Members: ___________________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Zeynep AKTÜRE Department of Architecture, İzmir Institute of Technology _____________________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Ela ÇİL SAPSAĞLAM Department of Architecture, İzmir Institute of Technology ___________________________ Dr. Çiğdem ALAS 25 August 2014 ___________________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Zeynep AKTÜRE Supervisor, Department of Architecture, İzmir Institute of Technology ____ ___________________________ ______________________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Şeniz ÇIKIŞ Prof. Dr. R. Tuğrul SENGER Head of the Department of Architecture Dean of the Graduate School of Engineering and Sciences ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor Assist.Prof.Dr.Zeynep AKTÜRE for her guidance, patience and sharing her knowledge during the entire study. This thesis could not be completed without her valuable and unique support. I would like to express my sincere thanks to my committee members Assist. Prof. Dr. Ela ÇİL SAPSAĞLAM, Dr. Çiğdem ALAS, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Erdem ERTEN and Assist. Prof. Dr. Zoltan SOMHEGYI for their invaluable comments and recommendations. I owe thanks to my sisters Yelin DEMİR, Merve KILIÇ, Nil Nadire GELİŞKAN and Banu Işıl IŞIK for not leaving me alone and encouraging me all the time. And I also thank to Seçkin YILDIRIMDEMİR who has unabled to sleep for days to help and motivate me in the hardest times of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypothesis / Research Question Sources of Study
    Gillis and Keating 1 Hypothesis / Research Question Did Byzantine sport and the Constantinople Hippodrome influence modern day sporting events and venues? Sources of Study Primary Figure 1: The Serpent Column depicted three snakes intertwined and was one of three legs holding a gold cauldron and was erected on the spina of the Hippodrome. (Governorship Of Istanbul). Gillis and Keating 2 Figure 2: The walled obelisk stood at the southern end of the Hippodrome (Governorship of Istanbul) Figure 3: The Obelisk of Theodosius. This Obelisk of Theodosius stood in the Hippodrome. (Governorship of Istanbul) Gillis and Keating 3 Figure 4: Picture of one side of the base of the Obelisk of Theodosius. The other side’s depicts the emperor and his family watching chariot races from the imperial box (Governance of Istanbul). Secondary Wells, C. (2006). “Sailing From Byzanthium: How A Lost Empire Shaped The Word” Bantam Dell: New York, New York Guttmann, A. (1981). Sport Spectators from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Journal of Sport History. Vol. 8 No. 2 p. 5‐27 Schrodt, B. (1981). Sports of the Byzantine Empire. Journal of Sport History. Vol. 8, No. 3. Bassett, S. (1991). The Antiquities in the Hippodrome of Constantinople. Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 45, 87‐96 Gillis and Keating 4 Guilland, R.(1948). The Hippodrome at Byzantium. Speculum, 23 (4), 676‐682 Sultan Amhed Square. In ‘Governorship of Istanbul’. Retrieved Feb 19 2009 from: http://english.istanbul.gov.tr/Default.aspx?pid=300 Limitations The lack of primary accounts of the hippodrome and it’s sporting culture has affected our research by having interpretations of accounts rather than an un‐interpreted account of detail.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Descending from the Throne: Byzantine Bishops, Ritual and Spaces of Authority Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5q80k7ct Author Rose, Justin Richard Publication Date 2017 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Descending from the Throne: Byzantine Bishops, Ritual and Spaces of Authority A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Religious Studies by Justin Richard Rose December 2017 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Michael Alexander, Co-Chairperson Dr. Sherri Franks Johnson, Co-Chairperson Dr. Sharon E. J. Gerstel Dr. Muhammad Ali Copyright by Justin Richard Rose 2017 The Dissertation of Justin Richard Rose is approved: Committee Co-Chairperson ____________________________________________________________ Committee Co-Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements Before all else, I give thanks to Almighty God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Here on earth, I am grateful to my mother, friends and parishioners who have encouraged and supported me throughout this last round of graduate study. And, yes, Mother, this is the last round of graduate study. My experience at the University of California Riverside has been extraordinary. I am especially grateful to Dr. Sherri Franks Johnson for her support and guidance over the last six years. Sherri made my qualifying exam defense a truly positive experience. I am grateful for her continued support even after leaving the UCR faculty for Louisiana State University at Baton Rouge. Thanks to the Religious Studies department for the opportunities I have had during my academic study.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lamentation of Santa Sophia Marios Philippides
    Tears of the Great Church: The Lamentation of Santa Sophia Marios Philippides URING THE PERIOD of the Ottoman occupation, the so- called Tourkokratia, the Greeks expressed their concerns D in folk songs, whose numerous variants were gradually collected and published in the nineteenth century to form an impressive corpus. Some songs reach back all the way to the last years of Byzantine Greece before its fall to the Ottoman Turks. One song in particular achieved a great deal of pop- ularity and perhaps qualifies as the most popular demotic song among Greek-speakers of the nineteenth century and the first decades of the twentieth. The poem is well known, but it has not received the scholarly attention it deserves. Entitled [The Song] of Santa Sophia, it is thought to describe the situation shortly before the fall of Constantinople to Sultan Mehmed II Fatih on May 29, 1453. This song survived orally and was finally recorded in the nineteenth century. Numerous versions existed in the eighteenth century; its nucleus dates to the period of the fall of Constantinople. I will attempt to demonstrate that at least one form of this poem dates to a specific event in 1452, six months before the conquest of Constantinople. Numerous variations of this poem have been collected.1 Fau- riel, in the first edition, presented a short version.2 Pouqueville 1 Variants from numerous regions are collected in A. Kriares, Πλήρηϛ Συλλογὴ Κρητικῶν Δηµωδῶν Ἀσµάτων (Athens 1920). A version was pub- lished in C. A. Trypanis, The Penguin Book of Greek Verse (Harmondsworth 1971) 469–470, no.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Analysis of Hagia Sophia: a Historical Perspective
    Transactions on the Built Environment vol 3, © 1993 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3509 Structural analysis of Hagia Sophia: a historical perspective R. Mark, A.S. Cakmak, K. Hill, R. Davidson Department of Civil Engineering & Operations Research, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ ABSTRACT An ongoing structural study by a group of American and Turkish engineers is aimed at deriving a better understanding of the structure and determining the current earthquake worthiness of Justinian's Hagia Sophia. This paper discusses possible design antecedents and aspects of the building's structural history as well as the creation of numerical models of its primary structure that account for both short- and long- term, linear and non-linear material behavior. INTRODUCTION Begun in 532 as the principal church of the Byzantine Empire (and converted to a royal mosque after the fall of the Empire in 1453), Hagia Sophia in Istanbul held the record as the world's largest domed building for some 800 years. For the dual role that the building was to assume in both ecclesiastical and imperial liturgies, the architects, Anthemius of Tralles and Isidorus of Miletus, combined a traditional longitudinal basilican plan (a large rectangular hall having a high central space flanked by lower side aisles) with an immense central dome. Given the close correspondence in scale between the original dome of Hagia Sophia and that of the early second-century Roman Pantheon, it is likely that the Pantheon provided the principal structural model for this translation of Roman concrete into Byzantine, largely-brick construction. While archeological evidence for the original dome that collapsed in 558 is unavailable, sixty-century descriptions indicate that the dome interior was likely profiled from the same spherical surface as the pen dent ives (thus creating a "pendentive dome").
    [Show full text]
  • The Hagia Sophia Churches (Fr
    The Hagia Sophia Churches (Fr. George Florovsky) johnsanidopoulos.com/2020/07/the-hagia-sophia-churches-fr-george.html By Fr. George Florovsky The first temple in Constantinople dedicated under the name of "Holy Wisdom" was possibly designed by Constantine himself. The building was however completed much later and the "Great Church" was first consecrated only in 360, under Constantius, by an Arian bishop. It is not at all clear when the name "Hagia Sophia" was first given to the church. Socrates says only: "which is now called Sophia" (II, 43). It is quite possible that the "Great Church" in the beginning had no special name, and the name of Sophia came to prominence later; it was probably a current connotation rather than an intentional dedication. The name, however, by no means was an accident. Some archeologist of old guessed that the name was rather an abstract idea or a Divine attribute, and that Constantine used to dedicate temples to "abstract ideas," — Wisdom, Power, Peace. All this is but a misunderstanding. The name of Wisdom is a biblical name, and all these three "abstract" names are used in St. Paul, as names of Christ: Sophia [Σοφία], Dynamis [Δύναμις], Eirênê [Ειρήνη]. Passages in the Old Testament where the Wisdom of God was described as a person (and specially the VIII-th chapter of Proverbs) were from an early date regarded as referring to Christ, the Incarnate Word. We find this in St. Justin. The other suggestion, that Wisdom meant rather the Holy Spirit (the Spirit of Wisdom, of course), found in Theophilus of Antioch and St.
    [Show full text]
  • Postgraduate Course in Byzantine Archaeology and History
    Postgraduate Course in Byzantine Archaeology and History PROVISIONAL ITINERARY Sunday 13th June Arrival at BSA by 21.00 21.00 Informal welcome dinner Monday 14th June 09.30 Course introduction and tour of the BSA 10.15 Library tour and research facilities 11.00 Coffee 11.30 Byzantine Identity: geography, peoples and languages 13.00 Lunch 14.00 Byzantine Athens: archaeology, topography and history 20.00 Group dinner in Kolonaki Tuesday 15th June 09.30 The Parthenon after Antiquity 10.30 Exploring Byzantine Athens: field trip Wednesday 16th June 09.30 Field trip to the Byzantine and Christian Museum Everyday life in Byzantine Athens Byzantine Coinage: medium of transaction and manifestation of imperial propaganda Worship and Art Thursday 17th June 09.30 Introduction to the Byzantine Research Fund (BRF) collection and tour of the BSA Archive 11.00 Coffee 11.30 Introduction to Byzantine Church Architecture using the Byzantine Research Fund Collection (part 1) 13.30 Lunch 14.30 Introduction to course research projects Friday 18th June 09.00 Depart BSA 09.30 Field trip to Dafni Monastery Topography of Byzantine Attika Iconography: the mosaics of Dafni Monastery 10.30 Depart Dafni Monastery 13.00 Lunch (provided) 14.00 Field trip to Mystras Laconian history between Sparta and Mystras: the legacy of antiquity Church case studies: Hagia Sophia and the Perivleptos Monastery Domestic archaeology of the lower town 17.00 Arrive at Mystras hotel Saturday 19th June 08.30 Depart Mystras 10.30 Field trip to Monemvasia Geopolitics in the Byzantine and
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Opposition to Alexios I Komnenos (1081–1118)
    The Political Opposition to Alexios I Komnenos (1081–1118) Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung des Akademischen Grades eines Dr. phil., vorgelegt dem Fachbereich 07 Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz von João Vicente de Medeiros Publio Dias aus São Paulo, Brasilien 2020 Dekan: 1. Gutachter: 2. Gutachter: Tag des Prüfungskolloquiums: 18. Juli 2018 Dedicado a Dai Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... 1 Note on translation and transliteration .................................................................................. 2 i. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 3 i.i. Bibliographic Review ...................................................................................................... 4 i.ii Conceptual and Theoretical Issues on Political Opposition in Byzantium ...................... 7 i.iii Sources .......................................................................................................................... 18 i.iii.i Material for History of Nikephoros Bryennios .......................................................... 24 i.iii.ii The Alexiad of Anna Komnene ................................................................................. 26 i.iii.iii The Epitome Historion of Ioannes Zonaras .............................................................. 30 i.iii.iv The Chronike
    [Show full text]
  • An Architectural Reflection of Community : a Study of the Patriarchal Churches in Constnatinople/Istanbul As a Reflection Of
    Luther Seminary Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary MA Theses Student Theses 2012 An Architectural Reflection of Community : a Study of the Patriarchal Churches in Constnatinople/Istanbul as a Reflection of the Relationship of Christians and Muslims in the Ottoman Empire Greta Steeber Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.luthersem.edu/ma_theses Part of the Ancient, Medieval, Renaissance and Baroque Art and Architecture Commons, History of Christianity Commons, Islamic Studies Commons, and the Islamic World and Near East History Commons Recommended Citation Steeber, Greta, "An Architectural Reflection of Community : a Study of the Patriarchal Churches in Constnatinople/Istanbul as a Reflection of the Relationship of Christians and Muslims in the Ottoman Empire" (2012). MA Theses. Paper 25. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses at Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary. It has been accepted for inclusion in MA Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Architectural Reflection of Community: A Study of the Patriarchal Churches in Constantinople/Istanbul as a Reflection of the Relationship of Christians and Muslims in the Ottoman Empire By Greta Steeber A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts History of Christianity Luther Seminary 2012 Advisor: Dr. Charles Amjad-Ali Reader: Dr. Sarah Henrich 1 Chapter I The Introduction Constantinople was a city of churches. It was the seat of the Byzantine Christian Empire for over one thousand years and in the course of the Middle Ages had over five hundred churches.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I the Byzantine Empire
    A TALE OF TWO EMPIRES: PART I THE BYZANTINE EMPIRE LECTURE I FOUNDATION: FROM BYZANTIUM TO CONSTANTINOPLE LECTURE II RECONQUEST: JUSTINIAN AND THE GOLDEN AGE LECTURE III DECLINE AND RESURGENCE: THE MACEDONIANS LECTURE IV THE ARRIVAL AND CONQUESTS OF THE SELJUK TURKS LECTURE V BYZANTINES, TURKS AND CRUSADERS LECTURE VI BYZANTINE ART AND ARCHITECTURE Copyright © 2007 by Dr. William J. Neidinger, Stylus Productions and The Texas Foundation For Archaeological & Historical Research FOUNDATION: FROM BYZANTIUM TO CONSTANTINOPLE I. INTRODUCTION - Byzantine and Ottoman Empires traditionally taught as two separate studies - compartmentalized and specialized nature of humanities today - their stories form a continuum - empires came to rule over the same peoples - empires faced many of the same enemies - empires came to accommodate these defeated enemies within their spheres - empires developed universalist mythologies for their respective religions - both served as mercenaries for the other - both at one time allied to one another - at one time imperial families intermarried - Imaret of Nilüfer Hatun, Nicaea (Iznik, Turkey) - 1346 Theodora marries Orhan; Nilüfer Hatun - remains Christian; regent while Orhan away at war - mother of Sultan Murad I (Moslem) - 1388 Imaret built by Murad I - both occupied the same imperial city: Byzantium, New Rome, Constantinople, Istanbul II. THE IMPERIAL CITY - capital of three empires: Roman / Byzantine, Latin Kingdom of the East, Ottoman Turkish - modern assessment of the city by the land: hills, valleys, buildings & walls - ancient assessment of the city by the waters: Golden Horn, Sea of Marmara, Bosphorus - strategic location: bridge between Europe & Asia and Black Sea & Mediterranean Sea - 667 BC Byzas of Megara consults Delphi re: foundation of a colony - “…opposite the blind…” and Chalcedon - acropolis beneath Tokapi Sarai - mercantile depot, repair center; fish; wine - 512-479 BC Persian occupation - 5th – 4th c.
    [Show full text]