Agnieszka Holland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Agnieszka Holland INTERVIEW WITH AGNIESZKA HOLLAND DIRECTOR OF “SPOOR”, A FEATURE FILM SUPPORTED BY EURIMAGES AUGUST 2019 BY TARA KARAJICA Agnieszka Holland © Karolina Poryzała Born in Warsaw, Poland, in 1948, Agnieszka way to translate it to the screen. We did spend a lot of Holland graduated from the Film and TV School of the time searching for the form of the story because the Academy of Performing Arts (FAMU) in Prague and genre is not obvious; it’s very mixed. It’s a combination began her career assisting Krzysztof Zanussi and of genres and this kind of storytelling is always more Andrzej Wajda. She collaborated with Krzysztof complicated to deliver. Kieślowski on the screenplay of his trilogy, “Three Colours”. Her film, Gorączka”“ , was screened in the IN THAT SENSE, CAN YOU TALK ABOUT THE ADAPTA- Competition at the Berlinale in 1981, the year in which TION PROCESS? she emigrated to Paris. Since then, she has made I have always liked Olga’s writing very much, but over 30 films, won many awards, including the Gold- most of her novels don’t have a classical storytelling en Globe and a Berlinale Silver Bear, and has been structure – they are more a mix of essays, reflections, nominated for a BAFTA and an Emmy. Her films – “ In meditations and a lot of small stories that are inter- , “ and “ – Darkness” Europa Europa” Angry Harvest” twined. So this one seemed to be quite a simple piece to were all nominated for an Academy Award. adapt because it’s a psychological thriller with detective Tara Karajica talks to Agnieszka Holland about her story elements, suspense as well as certain psychologi- award-winning film, Spoor”“ , a cross-genre story that cal elements, and humour and grotesque. Olga wrote premiered at the 2017 Berlinale, where it won the the first draft and it was the first time she had adapted Silver Bear – Alfred Bauer Prize – for a feature film that her own writing and she was pretty sure that it would opens new perspectives, and about women in film. be quite simple. She did it in two months or even faster and when we read it, we found it really awful! It didn’t HOW DID “SPOOR” COME ABOUT? WHAT ATTRACT- work at all! It was stripped of all the bits of mystery ED YOU TO OLGA TOKARCZUK’S NOVEL “DRIVE YOUR and ambiguity and it was a very flat journalistic state- PLOUGH OVER THE BONES OF THE DEAD”? ment. So we then sat together, made a new structure and wrote some scenes, trying to find a common style. Well, I knew the writer, the content, the message and We were sure then that it would be the final script in also the challenge – the fact that it is a very capricious three months’ time but, two years and eighteen drafts and mysterious piece and it wasn’t evident to find a later, we were still battling to find the right one. 1– COUNCIL OF EUROPE - EURIMAGES INTERVIEW WITH AGNIESZKA HOLLAND - AUGUST 2019 CAN YOU DELVE A LITTLE DEEPER INTO YOUR WORK WITH KASIA ADAMIK? HOW WAS SHE INVOLVED IN THE FILM? HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN COLLABO- RATING WITH HER? We did some TV series and “Janosik: A True Story” together. Quite often, she did extended second-unit directing on most of my films from the past 20 years when she was available, a very extended second unit that wasn’t the classical second unit, but more in terms of the development of scenes. She has a slightly different style but, at the same time, it’s comple- Agnieszka Mandat © Robert Palka mentary and comes from a similar sensibility but Finally, it was a friend of mine, Štěpán Hulík, a Czech from a different point of view. I always found it very screenwriter who wrote “Burning Bush”, who did a interesting to use this polyphony, this duality in points quiet and discreet bit of script doctoring and suddenly of view, trying to merge it into a film without making it started to work. I would say that we had the house it fall apart, but adding value to the storytelling. She’s built and practically finished, but the windows were very generous and quite often she gives me a lot of her dirty so it was impossible to look inside or out, and he ideas that work without her really being the co-author. washed the windows. But the final decisions were made Here, her involvement was really extensive and really during the editing because, after working on the script important. It was obvious that we should be present- for such a long time, we didn’t solve all the possible ed as co-directors. We weren’t co-directing in terms of problems and the dynamic of the shooting and directing together by sitting in front of the monitor the search for the shooting style took the story in a and directing, but we were dividing the scenes into slightly different direction than we had expected at the two units. She was shooting one kind of scene and I beginning. It was a pretty elaborate task. In the end, was shooting another kind of scene in a different way. maybe it’s not perfect in terms of storytelling efficien- cy, but I think it has life, originality and importance. YOU DENOUNCE THE WAY RELIGION, AGGRESSION AND MASCULINITY OPERATE IN THE RIGID SOCIAL IN WHAT WAY DID THE EXPERIENCE OF MAKING HIERARCHY OF THE RURAL WORLD OF THE VALLEY, “SPOOR” MAKE YOU LEAVE YOUR COMFORT ZONE? A PLACE RULED PREDOMINANTLY BY MEN’S PRIDE, WHAT WERE THE CHALLENGES? GREED AND THOUGHTLESSNESS. IT FEELS THAT I wanted to make this film because it was very WOMEN AND ANIMALS JOIN FORCES AGAINST PA- different from my previous films. My last film had TRIARCHY. IS THAT RIGHT? quite a classical story and I found the way to make Well, I hope so. Of course, it’s a kind of metaphor. On it simple and complex at the same time, as well as a very practical level, it means that hunters are hunt- accessible and efficient. And I felt that I was working in a ers and they are blind to the suffering of animals and comfort zone and I had to leave that comfort zone and they also have disdain for the weaker, and women are not take advantage of the craft of the storyteller, which I actually am. Mostly, I know from day two or three how to shoot the piece, but here, we’ve been shooting dif- ferent versions of a scene for a week or maybe longer. Kasia Adamik, who was my co-director – she was the second unit director and then she became the co-di- rector because of the complexity of the shooting – brought another point of view. It was really a process. It wasn’t the execution of the concept that was ready before we started to shoot; it was the dynamics with mistakes and achievements, failures and little victo- ries. Agnieszka Mandat & Miroslav Krobot © Robert Palka 2– COUNCIL OF EUROPE - EURIMAGES INTERVIEW WITH AGNIESZKA HOLLAND - AUGUST 2019 about it. And this power also, of course, in our times, touches the reproductive rights of women. Women who are emancipated procreate much less than those accepting the patriarchal system. So, suddenly, the demography is changing, which is also changing everything. It’s one of women’s rights and part of the fight for freedom and feminism. Misogyny and political reactions like that of the Catholic Church, that of Donald Trump or the reaction of the Polish governing party are a reaction to this deep change and Agnieszka Mandat & Marcin Bosak © Robert Palka the danger is, of course, that they want to take from us, weaker. Older women are even weaker and ani- women, the rights that we have already gained. They mals are powerless. But the subject also works on a are not taken for granted. We have to fight for them metaphorical level and the hunters are not only all the time because we can lose them, something you hunters, but hunting is an attitude towards the world, can see in dystopian novels, films and TV series like, for which is heavily enforced by the Catholic religion à la example, “The Handmaid’s Tale”. polonaise. It means that we have power. It means that WAS IT A RISK TO MAKE THE FILM BECAUSE IT TACK- we can do with the air, the planet, the animals and LES NOT ONLY THE SACROSANCT DOCTRINES OF weaker people whatever we want. We want them to HUNTING AND THE CHURCH BUT ALSO WOMEN’S serve us, not to be the servants to a common good, FIGHT? to higher values such as solidarity, equality, freedom and respect for everything that is alive. We tried to We were making the film before the political change catch the moment of the rebellion which, of course, is in Poland. The film opened just as this change ambiguous because what Duszejko, the heroine, does happened, which was actually both sad and funny is not something I would advise you to do now. We because suddenly we could observe the same hate on also show a sort of fantasy about revenge and the trap a much higher level within the new government. The of anger, because anger is also, I think, the main sub- Minister of the Environment behaved exactly like the ject of this story. And there’s a duality, an ambiguity to hunters from our film, destroying everything around anger, because it can be very constructive in that it can them and hating ecologists.
Recommended publications
  • Women in Power About Aspen
    No. 04 ASPEN.REVIEW 2017 CENTRAL EUROPE COVER STORIES Małgorzata Fidelis, Konrad Niklewicz, Dita Přikrylová, Matthew Qvortrup, Iveta Radičová POLITICS Andrii Portnov ECONOMY Ivan Mikloš CULTURE Michał Lubina INTERVIEW Agnieszka Holland, Teddy Cruz 9 771805 679005 No. 04/2017 Women — in Power Women in Power Women Quo— Vadis, Central and Eastern Europe? — Thinking Architecture without Buildings About Aspen Aspen Review Central Europe quarterly presents current issues to the general public in the Aspenian way by adopting unusual approaches and unique viewpoints, by publishing analyses, interviews and commentaries by world-renowned professionals as well as Central European journalists and scholars. The Aspen Review is published by the Aspen Institute Central Europe. Aspen Institute Central Europe is a partner of the global Aspen network and serves as an independent platform where political, business, and non-prof-it leaders, as well as personalities from art, media, sports and science, can interact. The Institute facilitates interdisciplinary, regional cooperation, and supports young leaders in their development. The core of the Institute’s activities focuses on leadership seminars, expert meetings, and public conferences, all of which are held in a neutral manner to encourage open debate. The Institute’s Programs are divided into three areas: — Leadership Program offers educational and networking projects for outstanding young Central European professionals. Aspen Young Leaders Program brings together emerging and experienced leaders for four days of workshops, debates, and networking activities. — Policy Program enables expert discussions that support strategic thinking and interdisciplinary approach in topics as digital agenda, cities’ development and creative placemaking, art & business, education, as well as transatlantic and Visegrad cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Film Appreciation Wednesdays 6-10Pm in the Carole L
    Mike Traina, professor Petaluma office #674, (707) 778-3687 Hours: Tues 3-5pm, Wed 2-5pm [email protected] Additional days by appointment Media 10: Film Appreciation Wednesdays 6-10pm in the Carole L. Ellis Auditorium Course Syllabus, Spring 2017 READ THIS DOCUMENT CAREFULLY! Welcome to the Spring Cinema Series… a unique opportunity to learn about cinema in an interdisciplinary, cinematheque-style environment open to the general public! Throughout the term we will invite a variety of special guests to enrich your understanding of the films in the series. The films will be preceded by formal introductions and followed by public discussions. You are welcome and encouraged to bring guests throughout the term! This is not a traditional class, therefore it is important for you to review the course assignments and due dates carefully to ensure that you fulfill all the requirements to earn the grade you desire. We want the Cinema Series to be both entertaining and enlightening for students and community alike. Welcome to our college film club! COURSE DESCRIPTION This course will introduce students to one of the most powerful cultural and social communications media of our time: cinema. The successful student will become more aware of the complexity of film art, more sensitive to its nuances, textures, and rhythms, and more perceptive in “reading” its multilayered blend of image, sound, and motion. The films, texts, and classroom materials will cover a broad range of domestic, independent, and international cinema, making students aware of the culture, politics, and social history of the periods in which the films were produced.
    [Show full text]
  • Burning Bush
    presents BURNING BUSH A Film by Agnieszka Holland 2013 / Czech Republic / in Czech with English subtitles / Color A Kino Lorber Release from Kino Lorber, Inc. 333 West 39 St., Suite 503 New York, NY 10018 (212) 629-6880 Publicity Contact: Rodrigo Brandão – [email protected] Matt Barry – [email protected] SHORT SYNOPSIS The three-part drama, directed by the Polish director Agnieszka Holland, is HBO Europe’s most ambitious, big-budget project to date. The film returns to a pivotal time in modern Czech history, ignored in Czech cinema until now. It begins with a reconstruction of the shocking act of a Czech university student, who in protest of the Soviet occupation of Czechoslovakia, set himself on fire in Prague’s Wenceslas Square on January 16, 1969, and died four days later. Through the story of the brave defense attorney Dagmar Burešová, who defended Palach’s legacy in a doomed lawsuit, the film examines the transformations taking place in Czechoslovak society after the invasion of the armies of the Warsaw Pact in August of 1968 and the installation of a hardline Communist government. It depicts the beginnings of Czech and Slovak resistance against the occupation, which reached its apex with the mass protests during Palach’s funeral. It also shows the nation’s gradual resignation under the pressure of fear and harsher persecution. LONG SYNOPSIS Part I On the 16th of January1969 on Wenceslas Square in Prague, a young student sets himself on fire in front of dozens of passers-by. Police Major Jireš (Ivan Trojan) investigates the circumstances of Palach’s actions.
    [Show full text]
  • 89Th Annual Academy Awards® Oscar® Nominations Fact
    ® 89TH ANNUAL ACADEMY AWARDS ® OSCAR NOMINATIONS FACT SHEET Best Motion Picture of the Year: Arrival (Paramount) - Shawn Levy, Dan Levine, Aaron Ryder and David Linde, producers - This is the first nomination for all four. Fences (Paramount) - Scott Rudin, Denzel Washington and Todd Black, producers - This is the eighth nomination for Scott Rudin, who won for No Country for Old Men (2007). His other Best Picture nominations were for The Hours (2002), The Social Network (2010), True Grit (2010), Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close (2011), Captain Phillips (2013) and The Grand Budapest Hotel (2014). This is the first nomination in this category for both Denzel Washington and Todd Black. Hacksaw Ridge (Summit Entertainment) - Bill Mechanic and David Permut, producers - This is the first nomination for both. Hell or High Water (CBS Films and Lionsgate) - Carla Hacken and Julie Yorn, producers - This is the first nomination for both. Hidden Figures (20th Century Fox) - Donna Gigliotti, Peter Chernin, Jenno Topping, Pharrell Williams and Theodore Melfi, producers - This is the fourth nomination in this category for Donna Gigliotti, who won for Shakespeare in Love (1998). Her other Best Picture nominations were for The Reader (2008) and Silver Linings Playbook (2012). This is the first nomination in this category for Peter Chernin, Jenno Topping, Pharrell Williams and Theodore Melfi. La La Land (Summit Entertainment) - Fred Berger, Jordan Horowitz and Marc Platt, producers - This is the first nomination for both Fred Berger and Jordan Horowitz. This is the second nomination in this category for Marc Platt. He was nominated last year for Bridge of Spies. Lion (The Weinstein Company) - Emile Sherman, Iain Canning and Angie Fielder, producers - This is the second nomination in this category for both Emile Sherman and Iain Canning, who won for The King's Speech (2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Gazeta Volume 28, No. 1 Winter 2021
    Volume 28, No. 1 Gazeta Winter 2021 Orchestra from an orphanage led by Janusz Korczak (pictured center) and Stefania Wilczyńska. Warsaw, 1923. Courtesy of the Emanuel Ringelblum Jewish Historical Institute. Used with permission A quarterly publication of the American Association for Polish-Jewish Studies and Taube Foundation for Jewish Life & Culture Editorial & Design: Tressa Berman, Daniel Blokh, Fay Bussgang, Julian Bussgang, Shana Penn, Antony Polonsky, Aleksandra Sajdak, William Zeisel, LaserCom Design, and Taube Center for Jewish Life and Learning. CONTENTS Message from Irene Pipes ............................................................................................... 4 Message from Tad Taube and Shana Penn ................................................................... 5 FEATURE ARTICLES Paweł Śpiewak: “Do Not Close the Experience in a Time Capsule” ............................ 6 From Behind the Camera: Polish Jewish Narratives Agnieszka Holland and Roberta Grossman in Conversation ................................... 11 EXHIBITIONS When Memory Speaks: Ten Polish Cities/Ten Jewish Stories at the Galicia Jewish Museum Edward Serrota .................................................................................................................... 15 Traces of Memory in Japan ............................................................................................ 19 Where Art Thou? Gen 3:9 at the Jewish Historical Institute ........................................ 20 REPORTS Libel Action Against Barbara Engelking
    [Show full text]
  • Download Detailseite
    H-9005:H_ 30.01.2011 15:24 Uhr Seite 398 Berlinale 2011 Agnieszka Holland Hommage BITTERE ERNTE Armin Mueller-Stahl ANGRY HARVEST AMERE RECOLTE Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1985 Länge 105 Min. Format 35 mm, 1:1.37 Farbe Stabliste Regie Agnieszka Holland Buch Paul Hengge Agnieszka Agnieszka Holland Holland, nach dem Roman Biografie von Hermann Geboren am 28.11.1948 in Warschau. H. Field, Stanislaw Regiestudium an der Prager Film hoch - Mierzenski schule FAMU. In den 70er Jahren Kamera Jozef Ort-Snep Regis seurin an polnischen Theatern Kameraassistenz Christian Karp und beim Polnischen Fernsehen, Schnitt Barbara Kunze Regie assistentin bei Krzysztof Zanussi, Ton Gunther Kortwich Drehbücher für Andrzej Wajda. 1980 Elisabeth Trissenaar, Armin Mueller-Stahl Foto: Deutsche Kinemathek Musik Jörg Straßburger erster internationaler Kinoerfolg mit Bauten Werner Schwenke AKTORZY PROWINCJONALNI (PRO- Ausstattung Holger Scholz VINZSCHAUSPIELER). 1981 Emigration BITTERE ERNTE Kostüm Hannelore Wessel nach Paris. Hat seither Filme in Oberschlesien, 1943. Nachdem die Jüdin Rosa aus einem Güterzug und Regieassistenz Dorota Paciarelli Frankreich, Deutschland und den damit der Deportation in ein KZ entkommen ist, findet sie Unterschlupf bei Herstellungsltg. Peter Hahne USA realisiert. dem Bauer Leon. Er pflegt die verstörte Frau gesund. Doch Rosa weiß nicht, Produzent Artur Brauner wie sie ihren Retter einschätzen soll. Denn Leon ist zwar ein hilfsbereiter Co-Produzent Klaus-Dieter Biography Lehmann Born in Warsaw on 28.11.1948, she Mann, aber auch ein Kriegsgewinnler,
    [Show full text]
  • The Czech Cinematography Will Be Represented at the Oscars by The
    The film Charlatan directed by Agnieszka Holland is taking off to fight for an Oscar The Czech Film and Television Academy (CFTA), which presents the Czech Lion awards, also nominates the Czech Republic’s candidate for the Oscar every year. This year, it is sending the drama Charlatan directed by Agnieszka Holland to fight for the most prestigious film award. Agnieszka Holland’s latest film is inspired by the real life of the healer Jan Mikolášek and the script was written by Marek Epstein. Ivan Trojan and his son Josef Trojan starred in the leading roles. The film was premiered at the 70th Berlinale International Film Festival this year. The ceremonial gala evening of the 93rd awards of the American Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences will take place on 25th April 2021 in Los Angeles. The academics were choosing from 10 Czech feature films and documentary features that had been submitted by their producers. The voting took place from 1st to 11th October 2020. The film Charlatan was created within the framework of a Czech-Irish-Polish-Slovak co-production and it presents a stirring biographical drama of an exceptional man gifted with unique healing powers against the background of historical events. The plot is inspired by real fortunes of the healer Jan Mikolášek who throughout his career answered the pleas of thousands of people from all the social classes and also some of the most prominent figures of the political and cultural milieu. Mikolášek is a person without official medical education who possesses the unique as well as unfathomable talent to diagnose illnesses and heal people by herbs even when the doctors are at a loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Melbourne Cinémathčque | October 5
    Melbourne Cinémathèque | October 5 - 19: ANGRY HARVEST - THE FILMS OF AGNIESZKA HOLLAND * * * The Melbourne Cinémathèque - Dedicated to screening rare & significant films from the history of international cinemaLike 766 HOME ABOUT SCREENINGS CTEQ ANNOTATIONS TICKETING & VENUE MEDIA & SUPPORT CONTACTS SPECIAL SEASONS OTHER SCREENINGS October 5 - 19 ANGRY HARVEST: THE FILMS OF AGNIESZKA HOLLAND Agnieszka Holland (1948-) was born to Jewish & Catholic heritage in the year that Stalinism seized the political reigns in Poland. Her mixed cultural heritage has affected a fearless honesty in Holland's beliefs & has provided much of the political force behind her filmmaking. Denounced by some as an anti-Semite but also honoured by Jewish associations, Holland's dissidence suggests a struggle with morality that most certainly stemmed from her parents: her mother, a Catholic, fought in the 1944 Warsaw Uprising & her father served in the Soviet Union's Red Army. Graduating from the Prague film academy in the early 1970s, she worked as an assistant director for Krzysztof Zanussi and Andrzej Wajda before starting her own directing career in the mid-'70s. Her intimate, committed & often critical work focused on both the world of art (filmmaking, theatre) & the daily grind of people in contemporary Poland. In 1981, after 2 of her key films were banned in her own country (Fever & A Lonely Woman), Holland escaped the political turmoil in Poland & went into exile in France, where she was able to continue making bold films with her trademark dark humour. Her often- gentle observations of the human condition & relationships are powerfully contrasted with an unapologetic desire to present everything as she sees it, without hesitation.
    [Show full text]
  • February Volume Editorial VOL
    EDITORIAL February Volume Editorial VOL. 38 (FEBRUARY 2014) BY EDITORS Colette de Castro and Konstanty Kuzma will be at the Berlinale (February 6-16) to cover the event for EEFB. In this month’s editorial, we offer a short outline of film politics in Poland. In both Czechoslovakia and Poland, Socialist rule after 1945 coexisted with an unequalled flourishing of the national film culture, with the Polish film school taking off in the late 1950s and the Czechsolovak New Wave in the 1960s. Both movements emerged around state film schools (Łódź and Prague respectively), and soon gained acclaim beyond ideological and national borders. That includes mutual inspiration of the two neighbors who have never had strong feelings for each other: Agnieszka Holland, from Poland, moved to Prague early on, witnessing the Prague Spring and graduating from FAMU, the Czech national film school, in 1971. But the Socialist authorities didn’t always welcome auteurs propagating original ideas about art, politics or society. With the crackdown of Czechsolovakia’s reformist aspirations after 1968, filmmakers were banned or obstructed in pursuing their careers. Others, like Miloš Forman, turned away from their home country, seeking careers elsewhere (in Forman’s case, with considerable success). Still, those artists who revoked their criticism of the Prague Spring were given a second chance and thus able to continue making films in Czechoslovakia: though his 1969 film Larks on a String was banned until 1990, Jiří Menzel is but one prime example (in 1987, he even received an Academy Award nomination for My Sweet Little Village). In Poland, things turned uglier.
    [Show full text]
  • Indelible Shadows Film and the Holocaust
    Indelible Shadows Film and the Holocaust Third Edition Annette Insdorf published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia Ruiz de Alarcon´ 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org C Annette Insdorf, 1983, 1989, 2002, 2003 Foreword to 1989 edition C Elie Wiesel This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First edition published 1983 by Random House Second edition published 1989 by Cambridge University Press Reprinted 1990 Third edition first published 2003 Printed in the United States of America Typefaces Minion 10/12 pt. and Univers67 System LATEX2ε [TB] A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Insdorf, Annette. Indelible shadows : film and the Holocaust / Annette Insdorf. – 3rd ed. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-521-81563-0 – ISBN 0-521-01630-4 (pb.) 1. Holocaust, Jewish (1939–1945), in motion pictures. I. Title. PN1995.9.H53 I57 2002 791.43658 – dc21 2002023793 ISBN 0 521 81563 0 hardback ISBN 0 521 01630 4 paperback Contents Foreword by Elie Wiesel page xi Preface xiii Introduction xv I Finding an Appropriate Language 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Titel Kino 2-2000
    EXPORT-UNION OF GERMAN CINEMA 2/2000 At the Cannes International Film Festival: THE FAREWELL by Jan Schütte LOST KILLERS by Dito Tsintsadze NO PLACE TO GO by Oskar Roehler VASILISA by Elena Shatalova THE TIN DRUM – A LONE VICTOR On the History of the German Candidates for the Academy Award »SUCCESS IS IN THE DETAILS« A Portrait of Producer Kino Andrea Willson Scene from “THE FAREWELL” Scene from Studio Babelsberg Studios Art Department Production Postproduction Studio Babelsberg GmbH August-Bebel-Str. 26-53 D-14482 Potsdam Tel +49 331 72-0 Fax +49 331 72-12135 [email protected] www.studiobabelsberg.com TV SPIELFILM unterstützt die Aktion Shooting Stars der European Filmpromotion www.tvspielfilm.de KINO 2/2000 German Films at the 6 The Tin Drum – A Lone Victor 28 Cannes Festival On the history of the German candidates for the Academy Award 28 Abschied for Best Foreign Language Film THE FAREWELL Jan Schütte 11 Stations Of The Crossing 29 Lost Killers Portrait of Ulrike Ottinger Dito Tsintsadze 30 Die Unberührbare 12 Souls At The Lost-And-Found NO PLACE TO GO Portrait of Jan Schütte Oskar Roehler 31 Vasilisa 14 Success Is In The Details Elena Shatalova Portrait of Producer Andrea Willson 16 Bavarians At The Gate Bavaria Film International 17 An International Force Atlas International 18 KINO news 22 In Production 22 Die Blutgräfin 34 German Classics Ulrike Ottinger 22 Commercial Men 34 Es geschah am 20. Juli Lars Kraume – Aufstand gegen Adolf Hitler 23 Edelweisspiraten IT HAPPENED ON JULY 20TH Niko von Glasow-Brücher G. W.
    [Show full text]
  • Nga | Viewing History Through the Filmmaker's Lens
    VIEWING HISTORY THROUGH THE FILMMAKER'S LENS Agnieszka Holland, lecture delivered Sunday, December 1, 2013 National Gallery of Art When I was thirteen years old, I became fascinated with ancient Rome. The impulse for that was a highly suggestive Polish TV adaptation of Billy Wilder's The Ides of March. I desperately wanted to enter this intense world, and so I decided that I must have reincarnated many times and that in ancient Rome I had been Brutus, with all his complexity and remorse, only to return in the Renaissance, but not as Michelangelo or Leonardo, but as an unknown friend of the latter (who, by the way, had a mysterious, dangerous relationship with Buonarotti). I even kept diaries as these pretended incarnations of mine. I was also convinced that one of my incarnations lived in occupied Poland during the Second World War, but this seemed to painful to write about. It wasn't until years later that this subject came back to me. I don't really believe in films describing historical events that happened ages ago. The stronger the remoteness, the more arbitrarily a filmmaker has to present it. This engenders a certain risk of falling into the most commonly encountered kind of kitsch: simplification, anachronisms, and overt aestheticization. The easiest step is to imitate the external time indicators (though even this requires intuition, knowledge, and diligence), such as costumes, props, and architectural details. The most difficult task is to discover the sense of inner truth, which makes the story deeply rooted in the historical context but at the same time doesn't make it look like some history manual article.
    [Show full text]