DOCSLIB.ORG

A Abutilon Mosaic Virus (Abmv), 8, 78 ACLSV. See Apple Chlorotic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Abutilon Mosaic Virus (Abmv), 8, 78 ACLSV. See Apple Chlorotic Index A Array technologies, 137, 256 Abutilon mosaic virus (AbMV), 8, 78 Artichoke Italian latent, 11, 59 ACLSV. See Apple chlorotic leaf spot virus (ACLSV) Artichoke latent, 11, 60 Aegilops, spp., 11 Artichoke yellow ring spot, 11, 59 Agarose gel electrophoresis, 134–135, 293 Aseptic plantlet culture, 252–253 Agropyron elongatum,11 Asparagus bean mosaic virus,11 Alfalfa cryptic virus (ACV), 5, 91 Asparagus latent, 11, 59 Alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV), 68, 69, 76, 90, 91, 107, 109, Asparagus officinalis, 11, 252 140, 141, 169, 173, 175, 203, 244, 261–264, 288 Asparagus stunt, 28, 59 Alfalfa temperate, 10, 57 Asparagus virus I (AV1), 11, 60 Alfamo virus,63 Asparagus virus II (AV2), 11, 59 Alliaria petiolata,29 Assessment of crop losses, 67–69 Allium cepa, 19, 21, 174 Atriplex pacifica,25 Alphacryptovirus,57 Aureusvirus,57 Alphaflexiviridae,60 Australian Lucerne latent, 11, 59 Aluminum mulches for vector control, 196, 197 Avena fatua,11 Amaranthus albus,10 Avena sativa, 21, 192 Amaranthus caudatus,15 Avocado sun-blotch, 6, 11, 57, 104, 132, 286 Amaranthus hybridus, 15, 27, 168, 169 Avocado viruses 1–3, 11, 57 Amaranthus viridis,26 Avoidance of virus inoculum from infected seeds, AMV. See Alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV) 186–189 Andean potato latent virus (APLV), 18, 61, 169, 288 Avoiding of continuous cropping, 189–190 Antisense RNA, 259, 264–265, 311 Avoid spread from finished crops, 314 Antiviral activities in plants, 259, 265–266 Avoid spread from ornamental plants, 314 Anulavirus,57 Avoid spread within seedlings trays, 314 Aphid vectors, 8, 70, 75, 77, 92, 170, 171, 190–192, 195, Avsunviroid, 5, 57, 60 218, 316 Avsunviroidae, 5, 57, 60 Aphis gossypii, 171 Azuki bean mosaic, 12, 60 Apium graveolens, 15, 26 Apple chlorotic leaf spot virus (ACLSV), 7, 8, 10, 61, 174, 289, 294 B Apple dapple viroid, 6, 10, 57 Badnavirus, 57, 141, 290 Apple mosaic virus (ApMV), 10, 59, 123, 209, 289, 292, Banana streak virus (BSV), 294, 296 294 Banana viruses, 11, 58 Apple scar skin viroid, 6, 10, 57, 128, 289, 294, 295 Barley false stripe, 11, 58, 105 Application of DIBA, 127 Barley mottle mosaic, 7, 8, 11, 62 Application of ELISA, 122–126, 292 Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV), 8, 63 Approved seed certification standards, 209–210 Barrier and cover crops, 192 Apricot, 6, 23, 247, 248, 292, 294 Bean common mosaic (BCMV), 4, 6, 12, 13, 60, 65, 68, Apricot gummosis,10 69, 87–92, 94, 103, 104, 107–109, 111, 112, 122, Apscaviroid,57 123, 127, 130, 139, 140, 142, 166–168, 173–175, Arabidopsis thaliana, 15, 26, 29, 87, 90, 240 177, 189, 191, 197–198, 202–205, 207, 212, 213, Arabis mosaic virus (ArMV), 141, 167, 295 216, 217, 219, 223, 242, 244, 260, 296 Arachis hypogaea, 14, 16, 17, 106 Bean common mosaic necrosis, 13, 60, 123, 139, 203 Arracacha virus A, 11, 59 Bean pod mottle virus (BPMV), 68, 77, 90, 105, 261 Arracacha virus B, 11, 59, 174 Bean red node, 28, 59 K.S. Sastry, Seed-borne Plant Virus Diseases, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-0813-6, 317 © Springer India 2013 318 Index Bean southern mosaic, 13, 61, 89, 174, 207 Bunyaviridae,61 Bean western mosaic, 12, 60, 89 Bymovirus,57 Bean yellow dwarf,8 BYMV. See Bean yellow mosaic virus (BYMV) Bean yellow mosaic virus (BYMV), 13, 21, 60, 61, 69, 90, 104, 106, 111, 123, 140, 141, 174, 202, 205, 207, 216, 242, 244, 264, 289, 295, 313 C Beet 1 alpha crypto, 13, 57 CABMV. See Cowpea aphid-borne mosaic (CABMV) Beet 2 alpha crypto, 13, 57 Cacao necrosis virus (CNV), 14, 59, 289 Beet 3 alpha crypto, 13, 57 Cacao swollen shoot virus (CSSV), 14, 57, 130, 289 Beet cryptic virus (BCV), 5, 91 Camelina sativa,29 Beetle vectors, 77, 170 CaMV. See Cauliflower mosaic (CaMV) Beet mild yellowing, 13, 60 Cannabis sativa,19 Beet temperate, 13, 57 Capillovirus, 57, 62, 63 Beet western yellows virus (BWYV), 8 Capsella bursapastoris,91 Beet yellows, 63, 174 Capsicum annuum, 10, 17, 23, 26 Beet 41 yellows,13 Capsicum frutescens, 17, 26, 27 Begomovirus, 57, 78, 260, 290, 294 Capsid protein mediated resistance, 257–258 Benincasa hispida,17 Carica papaya,21 Berseem mosaic, 10, 57 Carlavirus, 14, 25, 58, 62, 63, 76, 78, 110, 111, 177 Betacryptovirus,57 Carmovirus, 17, 58, 62, 63, 77, 177 Betaflexiviridae, 58, 61, 62 Carrot motley dwarf,8,294 Beta vulgaris (B. vulgaris,), 9, 10, 13, 20, 24, 27, 28, 91, Carrot motley leaf, 14, 62 174 Carrot red leaf (CaRLV), 8, 14, 60 Betula pendula,15 Carrot temperate virus 1 (CTeV1), 5, 14, 57 BICMV. See Blackeye cowpea mosaic (BICMV) Carrot temperate virus 2 (CTeV2), 5, 14, 57 Biological methods, 105–109 Carrot temperate virus 3 (CTeV3), 5, 14, 57 Biological properties, 109, 263 Carrot temperate virus 4 (CTeV4), 5, 14, 57 Biosafety regulations, 227, 228 Carthamus tinctorius, 25, 27 Blackeye cowpea mosaic (BICMV), 13, 60, 65, 69, 106, Cassia occidentalis,14 108, 111, 112, 115, 141, 191, 203, 205, 207, 212, Cassia yellow spot (poty), 14, 60 216 Cauliflower mosaic (CaMV), 7, 8, 15, 58, 63, 167 Black gram leaf crinkle,62 Caulimoviridae, 57, 58 Blackgram mild mottle, 13, 123 Caulimovirus, 58, 62, 63, 76, 141 Blackgram mottle virus (BMoV), 13, 58, 107, 117, 123, cDNA probes, 133, 136–137 130, 202 Celery latent, 15, 60 Black raspberry latent virus (BRLV), 14, 24, 59, 172, 175 Celosia argentea,20 Blue international seed sample certificate, 214, 215 Celosia cristata,25 Brassica chinensis var. parrachinensis,29 Cerastium holosteoides,17 Brassica napus var. silvestris,29 Cerastium viscosum,20 Brassica rapa var. amplexicaulis sub var. dentata,25 Cerastium vulgatum, 28, 91 Brassica rapa var. laciniifolia,20 Certification schemes, 114, 131, 213, 217–220, 293–298, Brassica vulgaris,24 311 Brinjal mosaic, 24, 61, 189 CF-PCR, 139, 142 Brinjal ring mosaic, 14, 62 CGMMV. See Cucumber green mottle mosaic virus Brinjal severe mosaic, 14, 62 (CGMMV) Broad bean mild mosaic, 14, 60 Challenges for the future, 315–317 Broad bean mottle, 14, 57 Challenges in diagnosis of pests in quarantine, 241 Broad bean stain, 14, 58, 69, 77, 89–91, 106, 123, 130, Chemical seed disinfection, 186–187 141, 166, 170, 174, 198, 240 Chenopodium album, 10, 25, 28, 169 Broad bean true mosaic, 14, 18, 58, 77, 115, 123, 127, Chenopodium amaranticolor, 15, 18, 19, 29, 109 130, 166, 170 Chenopodium murale, 21, 88, 89 Broad bean wilt, 14, 58 Chenopodium quinoa, 14, 15, 19, 20, 22, 24–26, 28, 174 Brome mosaic virus (BMV), 14, 57, 63, 91, 106, 115, Chenopodium serotinum (C. serotinum),18 123, 127, 130, 174 Cherry leaf roll virus (CLRV), 15, 59, 104, 111, 120, 123, Bromoviridae, 57–59 142, 144, 175–177, 187, 198, 240 Bromovirus, 57, 62, 63, 77, 110, 111, 141, 172, Cherry necrotic rusty mottle, 8, 15, 62 177 Cherry rasp leaf virus (CRLV), 15, 59, 174 Bromus inermis,11 Cherry ring mottle, 24, 59 Bromus, spp., 11 Cherry ring spot, 15, 62 Bumblebees, 79 Chicory yellow mottle (ChYMV), 15, 59 Index 319 Choice of enzyme labels and substrates, 120–121 Cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV), 16, 63, 68, 77, 105, Chrysanthemum coronarium,19 112, 115, 117, 141, 166, 186, 188, 202, 203, 212, Chrysanthemum morifolium,15 262–263, 312 Chrysanthemum stunt viroid (CSV), 6, 15, 60, 132, 140, Cowpea mottle virus (CPMoV), 16, 58, 77, 140, 198, 226, 294 202, 219, 240, 242 Cicer arietinum, 10, 17, 22, 106 Cowpea ring spot virus (CPRSV), 17, 58 Cichorium intybus,15 Cowpea severe mosaic virus (CPSMV), 17, 58, 124, 167 Cineraria mosaic, 15, 62 Cowpea severe mottle,17 Citrullus vulgaris, 17, 20 CPMoV. See Cowpea mottle virus (CPMoV) Citrus aurantifolia,15 CPMV. See Cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV) Citrus exocortis viroid, 6, 15, 60, 142, 226, 289, 294 Crambe hispanica,29 Citrus huanglongbing, 7 Crimson clover latent, 17, 59 Citrus leaf blotch, 15, 58 Crinivirus,58 Citrus mosaic, 15, 57, 289, 294 Crop rotation, 168, 191, 313, 316 Citrus psorosis, 8, 15, 60 Crops hygiene, 193–195 Citrus sinensis,15 Cross-banded masses in phloem, 110 Citrus sinensis x Poncirus trifoliata,15 Crotalaria juncea,26 Citrus tatter leaf, 15, 40, 292 Cryptovirus, 5, 57, 62, 63, 65, 76, 133, 177 Citrus veinal chlorosis,15 Crystalline aggregates, hexagonal, 110 Citrus xyloporosis,15 Crystalline arrays of virus particles, 110 Citrus yellow mosaic virus (CIYMV), 10, 58, 294 Crystalline, monolayer, 110 Classification of viruses, 56–62 Cucumber cryptic,5,18 Closed quarantines, 197, 250, 254 Cucumber green mottle mosaic virus (CGMMV), 17, 61, Closteroviridae,58 69, 80, 87, 89, 111, 127, 130, 140, 186, 188, 189, Closterovirus, 62, 63, 76, 110, 111, 295 194, 200, 202 Clover (red) mosaic, 16, 60 Cucumber leaf spot carmovirus (CLSV), 17, 57 Clover (white) mosaic, 16, 60 Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), 4, 6, 17, 58, 63, 68, 69, Clover (red) vein mosaic, 16, 58 77, 80, 87, 89–91, 103, 106, 108, 115, 124, 127, Clover yellow mosaic virus (CLYMV), 16, 60, 108 128, 134, 140, 141, 166–169, 171, 174, 177, 178, CLRV. See Cherry leaf roll virus (CLRV) 191–193, 196, 198, 202, 203, 205–207, 211, 212, Clumping of virus particles, 129–130 216, 219, 244, 258, 259, 261–264, 266, 288–290, CMV. See Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) 292, 294–296, 311, 313 Coat protein genes, 201, 259, 261–262, 264, 266, Cucumber pale fruit, 6, 19, 59, 226 311 Cucumis melo, 17, 20, 21, 27, 65, 79, 89, 106, 206 Cocadviroid,58 Cucumis melo var. flexaosus,20 Cocksfoot alpha cryptovirus,16 Cucumis pepo,30 Coconut cadang cadang viroid, 6, 16, 58, 132 Cucumis sativus, 17, 18, 27, 80, 89, 95 Cocos nucifera,16 Cucumis sativus cryptic,18 Coffea excelsa,16 Cucumovirus, 58, 62, 63, 76, 110, 111, 141, 167, 172, Coffee ring spot, 16, 60 177 Coleus blumei viroid 1, 6, 16, 58 Cucurbita flexuous,21 Coleus blumei viroid 2, 6, 16, 58 Cucurbita maxima, 24, 175 Coleus blumei viroid 3, 6, 16, 58 Cucurbita moschata,17
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Data Sheet on Cowpea Mild Mottle 'Carlavirus'
    Prepared by CABI and EPPO for the EU under Contract 90/399003 Data Sheets on Quarantine Pests Cowpea mild mottle 'carlavirus' IDENTITY Name: Cowpea mild mottle 'carlavirus' Taxonomic position: Viruses: Possible Carlavirus Common names: CPMMV (acronym) Angular mosaic (of beans), pale chlorosis (of tomato) (English) Notes on taxonomy and nomenclature: CPMMV is serologically closely related to groundnut crinkle, psophocarpus necrotic mosaic, voandzeia mosaic and tomato pale chlorosis viruses and is probably synonymous with them (Jeyanandarajah & Brunt, 1993). It is not serologically related to known carlaviruses, and should possibly be placed in a new sub-group of the carlaviruses. EPPO computer code: CPMMOX EU Annex designation: I/A1 HOSTS Natural hosts include Canavalia ensiformis, groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea), Phaseolus lunatus, P. vulgaris, Psophocarpus tetragonolobus, soyabeans (Glycine max), tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum), Vigna mungo, probably aubergines (Solanum melongena), cowpeas cv. Blackeye (Vigna unguiculata), Vicia faba and Vigna subterranea. The virus also occurs in various weeds (Fabaceae), including Stylosanthes and Tephrosia spp. Many more hosts can be artificially inoculated. GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION EPPO region: Egypt, Israel. Asia: India (Karnataka, Maharashtra and probably elsewhere), Indonesia, Israel, Malaysia, Thailand, Yemen. Africa: Côte d'Ivoire, Egypt, Ghana, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Nigeria, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, Zambia. South America: Brazil. Oceania: Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands. EU: Absent. BIOLOGY Unlike carlaviruses in general, CPMMV is transmitted in a non-persistent manner (Jeyanandarajah & Brunt, 1993). The ability to transmit CPMMV is usually retained for a maximum of 20-60 min (Muniyappa & Reddy, 1983). Non-vector transmission is by mechanical inoculation. Seed transmission has been demonstrated in a number of hosts in different countries, but there are also negative reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Autographa Gamma
    1 Table of Contents Table of Contents Authors, Reviewers, Draft Log 4 Introduction to the Reference 6 Soybean Background 11 Arthropods 14 Primary Pests of Soybean (Full Pest Datasheet) 14 Adoretus sinicus ............................................................................................................. 14 Autographa gamma ....................................................................................................... 26 Chrysodeixis chalcites ................................................................................................... 36 Cydia fabivora ................................................................................................................. 49 Diabrotica speciosa ........................................................................................................ 55 Helicoverpa armigera..................................................................................................... 65 Leguminivora glycinivorella .......................................................................................... 80 Mamestra brassicae....................................................................................................... 85 Spodoptera littoralis ....................................................................................................... 94 Spodoptera litura .......................................................................................................... 106 Secondary Pests of Soybean (Truncated Pest Datasheet) 118 Adoxophyes orana ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • P. Lava Kumar, A. T. Jones and F. Waliyar
    Methods Manual Edited by P. Lava Kumar, A. T. Jones and F. Waliyar Virology and Mycotoxin Diagnostics Laboratory International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics © International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, 2004 AUTHORS P. LAVA KUMAR Special Project Scientist – Virology Virology and Mycotoxin Diagnostics ICRISAT, Patancheru 502 324, India e-mail: [email protected] A. T. JONES Senior Principal Virologist Scottish Crop Research Institute (SCRI) Invergowrie Dundee DD2 5DA Scotland, United Kingdom e-mail: [email protected] FARID WALIYAR Principal Scientist and Global Theme Leader – Biotechnology ICRISAT, Patancheru 502 324, India e-mail: [email protected] Material from this manual may be reproduced for the research use providing the source is acknowledged as: KUMAR, P.L., JONES, A. T. and WALIYAR, F. (Eds) (2004). Serological and nucleic acid based methods for the detection of plant viruses. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru 502 324, India. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) Patancheru - 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India Telephone: +91 (0) 40 23296161 Fax: +91 (0) 40 23241239 +91 (0) 40 23296182 Web site: http://www.icrisat.org Cover photo: Purified particles of PoLV-PP (©Kumar et al., 2001) This publication is an output from the United Kingdom Department for International Development (DFID) Crop Protection Programme for the benefit of developing countries. Views expressed are not necessarily those of DFID. Manual designed by P Lava Kumar Serological and Nucleic Acid Based Methods for the Detection of Plant Viruses Edited by P.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytoalexins: Current Progress and Future Prospects
    Phytoalexins: Current Progress and Future Prospects Edited by Philippe Jeandet Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Molecules www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules Philippe Jeandet (Ed.) Phytoalexins: Current Progress and Future Prospects This book is a reprint of the special issue that appeared in the online open access journal Molecules (ISSN 1420-3049) in 2014 (available at: http://www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules/special_issues/phytoalexins-progress). Guest Editor Philippe Jeandet Laboratory of Stress, Defenses and Plant Reproduction U.R.V.V.C., UPRES EA 4707, Faculty of Sciences, University of Reims, PO Box. 1039, 51687 Reims cedex 02, France Editorial Office MDPI AG Klybeckstrasse 64 Basel, Switzerland Publisher Shu-Kun Lin Managing Editor Ran Dang 1. Edition 2015 MDPI • Basel • Beijing ISBN 978-3-03842-059-0 © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. All articles in this volume are Open Access distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles even for commercial purposes, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. However, the dissemination and distribution of copies of this book as a whole is restricted to MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. III Table of Contents About the Editor ............................................................................................................... VII List of
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Phylogeography of Rhizobial Symbionts Nodulating Legumes of the Tribe Genisteae
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Lincoln University Research Archive G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Review Phylogeny and Phylogeography of Rhizobial Symbionts Nodulating Legumes of the Tribe Genisteae Tomasz St˛epkowski 1,*, Joanna Banasiewicz 1, Camille E. Granada 2, Mitchell Andrews 3 and Luciane M. P. Passaglia 4 1 Autonomous Department of Microbial Biology, Faculty of Agriculture and Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] 2 Universidade do Vale do Taquari—UNIVATES, Rua Avelino Tallini, 171, 95900-000 Lajeado, RS, Brazil; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, P.O. Box 84, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand; [email protected] 4 Departamento de Genética, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500, Caixa Postal 15.053, 91501-970 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-509-453-708 Received: 31 January 2018; Accepted: 5 March 2018; Published: 14 March 2018 Abstract: The legume tribe Genisteae comprises 618, predominantly temperate species, showing an amphi-Atlantic distribution that was caused by several long-distance dispersal events. Seven out of the 16 authenticated rhizobial genera can nodulate particular Genisteae species. Bradyrhizobium predominates among rhizobia nodulating Genisteae legumes. Bradyrhizobium strains that infect Genisteae species belong to both the Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Bradyrhizobium elkanii superclades. In symbiotic gene phylogenies, Genisteae bradyrhizobia are scattered among several distinct clades, comprising strains that originate from phylogenetically distant legumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for Cowpea Mild Mottle Virus, a Seedborne Carlavirus (?) Judith K. Brown School of Plant Sciences University of A
    Recovery Plan for Cowpea mild mottle virus, a seedborne carla-like virus Judith K. Brown School of Plant Sciences University of Arizona, Tucson and Jose Carlos Verle Rodrigues University of Puerto Rico, San Juan NPDRS meeting APS, Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN August 10, 2014 Cowpea mild mottle virus (CpMMV) Origin (endemism): Africa: Kenya (1957), Ghana (1973)* Host: groundnut Arachis hypogaea L (1957, 1997, Sudan) cowpea Vigna unguiculata L. (1973) Distribution: now, worldwide in all legume growing locales (27+ documented) but importance in soybean unrealized until recently. Transmission •Whitefly-transmitted in non-persistent manner; Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) sibling species group (Muniyappa, 1983) AAP 10 min, IAP 5 min •Mechanically transmissible, experimentally •Seed borne to varying extents in different species and varieties of same species; particularly severe in certain soybean varieties. *often cited as the first report because the disease went largely unnoticed until then Likely multiple strains, but largely uninvestigated Synonyms: Groundnut crinkle (Dubern and Dollet, 1981) Psophocarpus necrotic mosaic (Fortuner et al., 1979) Voandzeia mosaic (Fauquet and Thouvenel, 1987) in the Cote d'Ivoire, tomato pale chlorosis in Israel (Cohen & Antignus, 1982) Tomato fuzzy vein in Nigeria (Brunt & Phillips, 1981) Bean angular mosaic virus in Brazil (Costa et al., 1983; Gaspar et al., 1985) shown to be serologically most closely related to CPMMV = proposed, distinct strains Isolates from solanaceous hosts in Jordan and Israel, although very similar to West African and Indian legume isolates, considered to be distinct strains – more information needed to confirm and differentiate (Menzel et al., 2010). Wide variation in virulence of CPMMV isolates from other countries also reported (Anno-Nyako, 1984, 1986, 1987; Siviprasad and Sreenivasulu, 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Cowpea Mild Mottle Virus Infecting Soybean Crops in Northwestern Argentina
    Cowpea mild mottle virus Infecting Soybean Crops in Northwestern Argentina Irma G. Laguna, Joel D. Arneodo, Patricia Rodríguez-Pardina & Magdalena Fiorona Instituto de Fitopatología y Fisiología Vegetal, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria - INTA, Camino 60 Cuadras km 5½, X5020ICA Córdoba, Argentina, e-mail:[email protected] (Accepted for publication on 20/01/2006) Corresponding autor: Irma G. Laguna RESUMO Cowpea mild mottle virus infectando soja no noroeste da Argentina Relata-se a ocorrência natural do Cowpea mild mottle virus (CPMMV, gênero Carlavirus) em culturas de soja [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] na província de Salta (noroeste argentino). Argentina is one of the leading soybean producing observed in samples from asymptomatic soybeans. On and exporting countries in the world. During the 2004/2005 this basis, plants were tested for Cowpea mild mottle virus cropping season, soybean production reached a record (CPMMV, genus Carlavirus) by DAS-ELISA. Leaf samples �8.� million tons. Although soybean is grown mainly in were ground in extraction buffer (PBS pH 6.8 + 0.05% Tween the central Pampas, it is also cultivated in the northwest 20 + 2% polyvinyl pyrrolidone) at a 1:5 (w/v) dilution. of the country, where it plays a significant role in the local Specific polyclonal antisera (DSMZ GmbH, Germany) were economy. Among the biotic factors affecting soybean used. Positive (supplied by DSMZ) and negative (healthy yields in this region, fungal diseases account for the major soybean) controls were included on each microtitre plate. economic losses (Wrather et al., Plant Dis. 81:107. 1997). After incubation with p-nitrophenyl phosphate at room Nevertheless, diseases of viral etiology have also been temperature for 1 h, A405nm values greater than 0.�00 were recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Role of Bradysia Impatiens (Diptera: Sciaridae) As a Vector Transmitting Peanut Stunt Virus on the Model Plant Nicotiana Benthamiana
    cells Article Analysis of the Role of Bradysia impatiens (Diptera: Sciaridae) as a Vector Transmitting Peanut Stunt Virus on the Model Plant Nicotiana benthamiana Marta Budziszewska, Patryk Fr ˛ackowiak and Aleksandra Obr˛epalska-St˛eplowska* Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Institute of Plant Protection—National Research Institute, Władysława W˛egorka20, 60-318 Pozna´n,Poland; [email protected] (M.B.); [email protected] (P.F.) * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] Abstract: Bradysia species, commonly known as fungus gnats, are ubiquitous in greenhouses, nurs- eries of horticultural plants, and commercial mushroom houses, causing significant economic losses. Moreover, the insects from the Bradysia genus have a well-documented role in plant pathogenic fungi transmission. Here, a study on the potential of Bradysia impatiens to acquire and transmit the peanut stunt virus (PSV) from plant to plant was undertaken. Four-day-old larvae of B. impatiens were exposed to PSV-P strain by feeding on virus-infected leaves of Nicotiana benthamiana and then transferred to healthy plants in laboratory conditions. Using the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), real-time PCR (RT-qPCR), and digital droplet PCR (RT-ddPCR), the PSV RNAs in the larva, pupa, and imago of B. impatiens were detected and quantified. The presence of PSV Citation: Budziszewska, M.; genomic RNA strands as well as viral coat protein in N. benthamiana, on which the viruliferous larvae Fr ˛ackowiak,P.; were feeding, was also confirmed at the molecular level, even though the characteristic symptoms of Obr˛epalska-St˛eplowska,A.
    [Show full text]
  • And Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus (TSWV) As Mixed Infection in Artichoke Production Areas - 7679
    Fidan – Koç: Occurrence of Artichoke latent potyvirus (ARLV) and Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) as mixed infection in artichoke production areas - 7679 - OCCURRENCE OF ARTICHOKE LATENT POTYVIRUS (ARLV) AND TOMATO SPOTTED WILT VIRUS (TSWV) AS MIXED INFECTION IN ARTICHOKE PRODUCTION AREAS FIDAN, H.1* – KOÇ, G.2 1Plant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey 2Subtropical Fruits Research and Experimental Center, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] (Received 11th Mar 2019; accepted 1st May 2019) Abstract. Artichoke (Cynara scolymus), is one of the most important agricultural products of North Cyprus (NC) due to its importance in export. During field surveys in artichokes production fields between 2013 and 2016, little and indistinguishable leaves, light shaded regions taking after mosaic with yellowish wilting of the leaves and little head development plants were gathered and broken down by DAS-ELISA for the examination of infections (most of them mentioned by Gallitelli et al. (2004)) which could be harmful to artichokes (belonging to groups of Nepovirus, Cheravirus, Fabavirus, Ilarvirus, Cucumovirus, Tombusvirus, Tobamovirus, Tobravirus, Potyvirus, Carlavirus, Potexvirus, Crinivirus, Tospovirus, Anulavirus, in the families of Rhabdoviridae and Bromoviridae respectively). Thirty-three samples were detected positive for mix infection of Artichoke Latent Potyvirus (ArLV) and Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) in Laboratory assays (ELISA and RT-PCR). The results were also confirmed by RT-PCR using total RNA which was extracted from the leaves. RT-PCR assay was conducted by newly designed Sense and antisense primer pairs specific to ArLV; L1TSWVR and L2TSWVF primer pairs specific to TSWV. As results of RT-PCR, the region of 485 bp special to coat protein of ArLV and 276 bp of TSWV were obtained in 2% agarose gel.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence to Support Safe Return to Clinical Practice by Oral Health Professionals in Canada During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Repo
    Evidence to support safe return to clinical practice by oral health professionals in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic: A report prepared for the Office of the Chief Dental Officer of Canada. November 2020 update This evidence synthesis was prepared for the Office of the Chief Dental Officer, based on a comprehensive review under contract by the following: Paul Allison, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University Raphael Freitas de Souza, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University Lilian Aboud, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University Martin Morris, Library, McGill University November 30th, 2020 1 Contents Page Introduction 3 Project goal and specific objectives 3 Methods used to identify and include relevant literature 4 Report structure 5 Summary of update report 5 Report results a) Which patients are at greater risk of the consequences of COVID-19 and so 7 consideration should be given to delaying elective in-person oral health care? b) What are the signs and symptoms of COVID-19 that oral health professionals 9 should screen for prior to providing in-person health care? c) What evidence exists to support patient scheduling, waiting and other non- treatment management measures for in-person oral health care? 10 d) What evidence exists to support the use of various forms of personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing in-person oral health care? 13 e) What evidence exists to support the decontamination and re-use of PPE? 15 f) What evidence exists concerning the provision of aerosol-generating 16 procedures (AGP) as part of in-person
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence That Whitefly-Transmitted Cowpea Mild Mottle Virus Belongs To
    Arch Virol (1998) 143: 769–780 Evidence that whitefly-transmitted cowpea mild mottle virus belongs to the genus Carlavirus 1 2 2 2; 1 R. A. Naidu ,S.Gowda , T. Satyanarayana , V. Boyko ∗, A. S. Reddy , W. O. Dawson2, and D. V. R. Reddy1 1Crop Protection Division, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, India 2Citrus Research and Education Center (CREC), University of Florida, Lake Alfred, Florida, U.S.A. Accepted October 7,1997 Summary. Two strains of whitefly-transmitted cowpea mild mottle virus (CP- MMV) causing severe (CPMMV-S) and mild (CPMMV-M) disease symptoms in peanuts were collected from two distinct agro-ecological zones in India. The host-range of these strains was restricted to Leguminosae and Chenopodiaceae, and each could be distinguished on the basis of symptoms incited in different hosts. The 30-terminal 2500 nucleotide sequence of the genomic RNA of both the strains was 70% identical and contains five open reading frames (ORFs). The first three (P25, P12 and P7) overlap to form a triple gene block of proteins, P32 en- codes the coat protein, followed by P12 protein located at the 30 end of the genome. Genome organization and pair-wise comparisons of amino acid sequences of pro- teins encoded by these ORFs with corresponding proteins of known carlaviruses and potexviruses suggest that CPMMV-S and CPMMV-M are closely related to viruses in the genus Carlavirus. Based on the data, it is concluded that CPMMV is a distinct species in the genus Carlavirus. Introduction Cowpea mild mottle virus (CPMMV) was first reported on cowpea in Ghana [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Viruses Infecting the Plant Pathogenic Fungus Rhizoctonia Solani
    viruses Review Viruses Infecting the Plant Pathogenic Fungus Rhizoctonia solani Assane Hamidou Abdoulaye 1 , Mohamed Frahat Foda 1,2,3,* and Ioly Kotta-Loizou 4 1 State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; [email protected] 2 State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China 3 Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Benha University, Moshtohor, Toukh 13736, Egypt 4 Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-137-2027-9115 Received: 19 October 2019; Accepted: 26 November 2019; Published: 30 November 2019 Abstract: The cosmopolitan fungus Rhizoctonia solani has a wide host range and is the causal agent of numerous crop diseases, leading to significant economic losses. To date, no cultivars showing complete resistance to R. solani have been identified and it is imperative to develop a strategy to control the spread of the disease. Fungal viruses, or mycoviruses, are widespread in all major groups of fungi and next-generation sequencing (NGS) is currently the most efficient approach for their identification. An increasing number of novel mycoviruses are being reported, including double-stranded (ds) RNA, circular single-stranded (ss) DNA, negative sense ( )ssRNA, and positive sense (+)ssRNA viruses. − The majority of mycovirus infections are cryptic with no obvious symptoms on the hosts; however, some mycoviruses may alter fungal host pathogenicity resulting in hypervirulence or hypovirulence and are therefore potential biological control agents that could be used to combat fungal diseases.
    [Show full text]