Future of Europe Observer, Vol. 3, No. 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Future of Europe Observer, Vol. 3, No. 1 Future of Europe Observer Contents Vol. 3 No. 1 January 2015 Not a pack of bureaucrats: the new European Commission ����1 Not a pack of bureaucrats: the new European Better Regulation, Inter- Commission Institutional Relations, the By Sally Brammer* Rule of Law and the Charter of he new President of the Eu- cratic legitimacy. In his address Fundamental Rights: First Vice ropean Commission Jean- to the European Parliament be- President Frans Timmermans 3 T Claude Juncker sees himself dif- fore they voted to accept the new Energy Union: Vice President ferently, he sees his role different- Commission he stated “I have been Maroš Šefčovič �����������������������������4 ly, he sees his Commission as a elected President of the Commis- ‘last chance Commission’ which sion on the basis of a programme Budget and Human Resources: will either succeed or fail. Junck- that binds me to the European Vice President Kristalina er has laid out an ambitious polit- Parliament. I have a contract with Georgieva ��������������������������������������5 ical agenda for the political cycle you, Mr President, and with this of 2014-2019. He views this agenda House.” Despite evidence that the EU Foreign and Security as a form of political contract - a Spitzenkandidat system did not Policy: High Representative mandate - and he has implement- motivate people to vote (a Euroba- and Vice President Federica ed broad changes in order to re- rometer poll following the election Mogherini ���������������������������������������6 alize it. In doing so he has raised found that only 5% of voters across Jobs, Growth, Investment expectations – whether they can the 28 member states were moti- and Competitiveness: Vice or will be real- vated President Jyrki Katainen ����������8 ized is another to vote question. in order Digital Single Market: Vice he new to in- President Andrus Ansip �����������9 TEuropean f luence Commission the ap- ZEI Insights ��������������������������������� 10 officially -be point- gan work on ment of Euro and Social Dialogue: Vice the next President Valdis Dombrovskis the 1st Novem- ber 2014. For Com- ............................................................11 mission the first time College of Commissioners ©European Commission 2015 there was a di- presi- 1 rect link between the outcome of dent ) the Commission’s new web- the European Parliament elections site proudly states “the President was elected by the European Par- Future of Europe Observer and the appointment of the Com- accompanies the debate on governance mission President. Juncker puts liament on the basis of his Politi- and regulation in the European Union. great worth in the fact that he cal Guidelines”. Juncker is making Authors are ZEI Scholars, Master of it clear that his ‘Agenda for Jobs, European Studies Fellows and Alumni. views himself as elected, believing this gives him much greater demo- Growth, Fairness and Democratic Change’ has the support of the parliament, thereby Commissioners have been grouped into 7 project improving the democratic legitimacy of European teams and require the approval of their respective decision-making. Vice President in order to push legislative propos- he bold statement of 10 priorities, within this als forward. It is expected that they work togeth- Tagenda, raises expectations and also outlines er as a college within a dynamic structure, as the objectives against which the Commission and its composition of the project team changes according actions can be measured, further increasing the to the policy in question. This dynamic and more pressure for success. One can predict that Juncker organic system has the potential to streamline co- will make use this pressure and the argument that ordination and increase efficiency; however it also could create confusion as Commissioners must sometimes report to more than one Vice President. For this new structure, which moves away from the idea that all Commissioners are equal, to be a success it requires that all Commissioners play nicely with each other and learn to share the man- agement of portfolios, with other Commissioners and with respective Vice Presidents. Time will tell whether these change will indeed improve inter- nal coordination and lead to better policy making, or whether it creates resentment and internal di- Commission President Jean Claude Junker visions. ©European Commission 2015 hose who campaigned against Juncker’s ap- he was elected on the basis of these 10 priorities Tpointment argued that he is an old Brussels in order to pressure other EU actors such as the insider; however he has proven he is here to shake Council and the Parliament to support his agenda. things up. He has used his experience and nego- Indeed he has already sent a letter to the Europe- tiating ability to cleverly appoint Vice-Presidents an Parliament and the Italian Prime Minister, who from smaller member states, whilst ensuring that held the rotating EU presidency, explaining the larger states have all received important portfolios. priorities and calling for the three institutions to To support his argument that the Commission is work together to develop strategic objectives and not just a troop of ‘anonymous high officials’ he deliverables. Therefore whilst increasing pressure has surrounded himself with a college of political on himself and his team he is also creating the heavyweights; with four former Prime Ministers opportunity for leverage during negotiations with and nineteen former Ministers who have the expe- the other EU actors. rience and leadership skills to take charge and not utlining 10 priorities has not been Juncker’s be overrun by director-generals. Oonly innovation, he has also shown a deter- 2014 was a year of transition in the European Union mination to fundamentally change the structure of and there is a sense of change in Brussels. Junck- the college with a centralization of power in a more er has implemented significant changes in order cabinet type structure. Previously the position of to increase the efficiency and transparency of the Commission Vice President was symbolic and hon- Commission, something observers have long been orary in nature; however Juncker has delegated calling for. Whether Juncker’s bold decisions and much of his own power to his Vice-Presidents. The sense of purpose can effect genuine change, which appointment of 7 Vice-Presidents with real power satisfies the high expectations so far generated, and coordination responsibilities is meant to im- will become apparent over the next few months. prove efficiency and ensure policy coherence. How- *Sally Brammer is a Research Fellow at ZEI and ever, an important question is whether this more Alumna “Class of 2012” hierarchical system leads to more or less internal struggles amongst Commissioners, the majority 1.For information: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/pdf/eurobarometre/2014/ of whom are used to powerful positions at home. post/post_2014_survey_analitical_overview_en.pdf 2 Future of Europe Observer Vol. 3 No. 1 January 2015 Better Regulation, Inter-Institutional Relations, the Rule of Law and the Charter of Fundamental Rights: First Vice President Frans Timmermans By Aliaksandra Liakh, Carolin Pütz and Maria Kapiniaris rans Timmermans is the new First Vice-Presi- tence to its Court to review EU measures may pose Fdent for Better Regulation, Inter-Institutional a serious threat to the uniform interpretation and Relations, the Rule of Law and the Charter of Fun- effective application of European Law. damental Rights. His main political objectives are immermans will face daily governance chal- focused on driving better regulation to ‘cut red- Tlenges as his responsibilities are central issues tape’, promoting better work with the European- for the EU and have significant implications for the Parliament and bringing the European Union (EU) rest of the Commissioners. The EU’s complex and closer to its citizens by strengthening interactions diverse multi-governance structure results from between the Commission and national parliaments. the differing perspectives of the EU institutions, He endeavours to enhance the transparency of the this is particularly clear during decision making. Commission’s activities by creating a mandatory Furthermore, there are disparities amongst Mem- register for lobbyists with the overarching objec- ber States, as each state claims its own interests tive being to uphold the Rule of Law and Charter and political aims, and importantly, their differing of Fundamental Rights in all of the Commission’s capabilities which will undoubtedly be debated and activities, which includes the process of accession overlapped during the process of policy making. of the EU to the Convention for the Protection of Factors which have shifted the political climate in Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of the Council of Europe. onflicting aims will arise in Timmerman’s Cportfolio as he strives to achieve the priori- ties laid down in Juncker’s political guidelines - to create a new boost for jobs and growth by pro- moting an positive environment for investment and entrepreneurship. European regulation plays in this respect a pivotal role.1 The challenge is to keep regulation simple and not to go beyond what is necessary.2 Thus, the EU has to find and trans- late into its legislation a proper balance between First Vice President Frans Timmermans, freedom for entrepreneurship, on the one hand, ©European Commission 2015 and safety for citizens on the other. Despite their Europe, as seen in the last elections
Recommended publications
  • Télécharger (79.278 Kb
    COMMISSION EUROPEENNE Bruxelles, le 8 mars 2013 CALENDRIER du 11 au 17 mars 2013 (Susceptible de modifications en cours de semaine) Activités des Institutions Déplacements et visites Lundi 11 mars Foreign Affairs Council (FAC) Mr Andris PIEBALGS receives Secretary of State of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation of Portugal, Mr Brites PEREIRA and General Affairs Council (GAC) Secretary of State of European Affairs of Portugal, Mr Transport, Telecommunications and Miguel MORAIS LEITÃO Energy Council (TTE Transport) Ms Androulla VASSILIOU in Dublin: gives a press European Parliament plenary session conference at the Royal Hospital Kilmainham (RHK); (11-14/03) delivers opening speech at the "EU Youth conference 2013" organised by the Irish presidency Ms Maria DAMANAKI and Mr Dacian CIOLOŞ in Dublin: deliver speeches at the meeting of the AgriFish Committees Chairpersons from National Parliaments of the European Union. Mr Dacian CIOLOŞ also delivers a speech at the European Young Farmers conference Ms Kristalina GEORGIEVA attends the Friends of Europe event "Japan Seminar - For a More Resilient Word" Ms Cecilia MALMSTRÖM receives Ms Eva Birgitta OHLSSON, Minister for European Union Affairs of Sweden Ms Cecilia MALMSTRÖM receives Ms Vesna PUSIĆ, First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign and European Affairs of Croatia Mardi 12 mars Mr Maroš ŠEFČOVIČ meets Ms M. Michel BARNIER rencontre M. Benoît HAMON, Ministre Lucinda CREIGHTON, Minister of délégué auprès du ministre français de l'Economie et des State for European affairs of Ireland,
    [Show full text]
  • The EU and the South Caucasus 25 Years Since Independence Nov 25, 2016 by Amanda Paul
    The EU and the South Caucasus 25 Years Since Independence Nov 25, 2016 by Amanda Paul Wedged between regional powers Russia, Iran and Turkey, the South Caucasus is an extraordinarily complex region; one of the most security-challenged and fragmented regions in the world with internal and external security threats working to reinforce each other. The three South Caucasus states – Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan – are complicated even in their internal configuration. Twenty-five years since the collapse of the Soviet Union the region remains plagued by conflict, its people living in insecurity. Moreover, the region has not been politically or economically integrated. Rather Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia have integrated into a wide-range of different, sometimes opposing, organisations and alliances. The EU joined the mix of actors and organisations engaged in the South Caucasus in the early 1990‟s intensifying its engagement over the years with the three states becoming part of the EU‟s European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) and Eastern Partnership (EaP). Despite hopes that the ENP/EaP could act as transformative tool to help strengthen stability, security, democracy and bring about a more cohesive region, the results have been rather patchy. The EU has failed to carve out a clear strategy or policy for the region and with the exception of Georgia there has been little genuine will to implement serious reform. Moreover, Russia‟s annexation of Crimea and war in the Donbas in 2014 and the increasingly polarised standoff between Moscow and the West has further exacerbated the fragile security situation, further exposing the inability of the EU to guarantee or even shore-up a partner‟s security.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme of the Youth, Peace and Security Conference
    1 Wednesday, 23 May European Parliament – open to all participants – 12:00 – 13:00 Registration European Parliament Accreditation Centre (right-hand side of the Simone Veil Agora entrance to the Altiero Spinelli building) 13:00 – 14:00 Buffet lunch reception Members’ Restaurant, Altiero Spinelli building 14:00 – 15:00 Opening Session Room 5G-3, Altiero Spinelli building Keynote Address by Mr. Antonio Tajani, President of the European Parliament Chair Ms. Heidi Hautala, Vice-President of the European Parliament Speakers Ms. Mariya Gabriel, EU Commissioner for Digital Economy and Society Mr. Oscar Fernandez-Taranco, UN Assistant Secretary-General for Peacebuilding Support Ms. Ivana Tufegdzic, fYROM, EP Young Political Leaders Mr. Dereje Wordofa, UNFPA Deputy Executive Director Ms. Nour Kaabi, Tunisia, NET-MED Youth – UNESCO Mr. Oyewole Simon Oginni, Nigeria, Former AU-EU Youth Fellow 2 15:00 – 16:30 Parallel Thematic Panel Discussions Panel I Youth inclusion for conflict prevention and sustaining peace Library reading room, Altiero Spinelli building Discussants Ms. Soraya Post, Member of the European Parliament Mr. Oscar Fernandez-Taranco, UN Assistant Secretary-General for Peacebuilding Support Mr. Christian Leffler, Deputy Secretary-General, European External Action Service Mr. Amnon Morag, Israel, EP Young Political Leaders Ms. Hela Slim, France, Former AU-EU Youth Fellow Mr. MacDonald K. Munyoro, Zimbabwe, EP Young Political Leaders Facilitator Ms. Gizem Kilinc, United Network of Young Peacebuilders Panel II Young people innovating for peace Library room 128, Altiero Spinelli building Discussants Ms. Barbara Pesce-Monteiro, Director, UN/UNDP Representation Office in Brussels Ms. Anna-Katharina Deininger, OSCE CiO Special Representative and OSG Focal Point on Youth and Security Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Frans Timmermans Cc: Günther Oettinger, Jyrki Katainen, Karmenu Vella and Phil Hogan
    Frans Timmermans Cc: Günther Oettinger, Jyrki Katainen, Karmenu Vella and Phil Hogan European Commission Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels 20th March 2018 Dear First Vice-President Timmermans, We are writing to you as civil society representatives (environmental NGOs, farmers, food movements, and animal welfare groups) regarding the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) reform, following recent details given in Commission presentations to the Council and the Parliament on its substance, in particular the common EU objectives. 1) We would like to recall that for the next CAP to be truly results-oriented, make effective and efficient use of EU taxpayers’ money, and respond to citizens’ demands to better protect our natural resources, ensure the welfare of farmed animals and ensure many and diversified farms, the EU objectives should be specific, measurable and time-bound so that progress towards them can be properly monitored.1 2) Unfortunately we are very concerned that the objectives will be very general and vague, which will make it very easy for Member States to systematically choose the least ambitious measures without facing adequate monitoring or control—as experienced with the last reform’s ‘greening’, which added complexity and completely failed to address the challenges facing the sector. 3) Furthermore, objectives focussed on increasing production—such as ‘food security’—are not only unjustified in the context of overproduction and overconsumption in Europe, especially of animal products, but also risk undermining other objectives on the long-term resilience of the sector, the environment, animal welfare, climate, human health and fair income for the smallest and most sustainable farms.
    [Show full text]
  • QUESTIONNAIRE to COMMISSIONER Günther
    QUESTIONNAIRE TO COMMISSIONER Günther OETTINGER On the transfer of portfolio for Budget & Human Resources Questions from the Committee on Budgets 1. "Budget galaxy" What is your vision of the future evolution of the Union budget in the light of the growing use of guarantees, financial instruments, trust funds and facilities? How would you ensure that those instruments do not jeopardize the agreed policies and provide additionality? What measures will you undertake in order to safeguard the unity and transparency of 2. Implementationthe budget and the delays prerogatives / Paymen of thet forecast budgetary authority? Major delays in the implementation of the 2014-2020 programmes led to a drop in payment needs in 2016 and 2017. This is worrying for the programmes itself, and risks the reconstitution of a backlog of unpaid bills at the end of the MFF term. What measures will you take to counter the underimplementation trend? How do you plan to avoid the reconstitution of a payment backlog at the end of the MFF period? After repeated requests, the Commission finally provided a payment forecast until 2020 at the occasion of the MFF mid-term review/revision. Do you commit to update this payment forecast every year, so that the budgetary authority 3. Preparationis provided sufficient of the post information-2020 MFF to take the right decisions? According to Art.25 of the MFF regulation, the Commission shall present a proposal for a new multiannual financial framework before 1st January 2018: • With reference to the above, could you provide details
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 15 Mr Jean-Claude Juncker President European Commission Cc
    Mr Jean-Claude Juncker President European Commission cc: Frans Timmermans, First Vice-President, in charge of Better Regulation, Inter-Institutional Relations, the Rule of Law and the Charter of Fundamental Rights Andrus Ansip, Vice-President for the Digital Single Market Jyrki Katainen, Vice-President for Jobs, Growth, Investment and Competitiveness Maroš Šefčovič, Vice-President for the Energy Union Vytenis Andriukaitis, Commissioner for Health and Food Safety Elžbieta Bieńkowska, Commissioner for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs Violeta Bulc, Commissioner for Transport Miguel Arias Cañete, Commissioner for Climate Action and Energy Corina Creţu, Commissioner for Regional Policy Carlos Moedas, Commissioner for Research, Science and Innovation Cecilia Malmström, Commissioner for Trade Pierre Moscovici, Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs, Taxation and Customs Tibor Navracsics, Commissioner for Education, Culture, Youth and Sport Günther Öttinger, Commissioner for Budget and Human Resources Marianne Thyssen, Commissioner for Employment, Social Affairs, Skills and Labour Mobility Karmenu Vella, Commissioner for Environment, Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Margrethe Vestager, Commissioner for Competition Brussels, 16 June 2017 Re: Contribute to economic growth and climate change mitigation through a EU Cycling Strategy Dear President Juncker, With this letter, signed by leaders from businesses, public authorities and civil society, we call upon the European Commission to unlock the potential for creating jobs
    [Show full text]
  • European Commission
    COMMISSION EUROPEENNE Bruxelles, le 12 septembre 2014 CALENDRIER du 15 au 21 septembre 2014 (Susceptible de modifications en cours de semaine) Déplacements et visites Lundi 15 septembre European Parliament plenary session (15-18/9) Mr José Manuel Durão BARROSO receives Mr Beinigno AQUINO III, President of the Philippines Mr Siim KALLAS receives Mr Román ESCOLANO, Vice-President of the European Investment Bank Mr Jyrki KATAINEN in Portugal: meets with Mr Pedro PASSOS COELHO, Prime Minister of Portugal; speech on “European Banking Union in the making" at the Bank of Portugal Mr Andris PIEBALGS and Ms Kristalina GEORGIEVA participate in the High level EU coordination meeting "A European wide response to the Ebola epidemic" Ms Androulla VASSILIOU visits Cyprus: meets Mr Costas KADIS, Minister of Education and Culture; opens of the Centre of Visual Arts and Research, Nicosia Mr Algirdas ŠEMETA in Vilnius: delivers a keynote speech at the Investors Forum "Europe‘s Competitiveness Recipe" Mr Johannes HAHN in Vienna: gives a key note speech at the conference organized by the Austrian Chamber of Economy: "EU structural funds in the period 2014-2020" with the participation of Mr Reinhold MITTERLEHNER, Minister of Economy Ms Connie HEDEGAARD in Copenhagen (Denmark): intervention at the Conference on Green Mobility in the future Mr László ANDOR delivers key note speech at the session "Integration of People with an Intellectual Disability - Policy-making perspective" at the Scientific Symposium of the 2014 Special Olympics European Summer Games (Antwerp)
    [Show full text]
  • Incomplete Hegemonies, Hybrid Neighbours: Identity Games and Policy Tools in Eastern Partnership Countries Andrey Makarychev
    Incomplete Hegemonies, Hybrid Neighbours: Identity games and policy tools in Eastern Partnership countries Andrey Makarychev No 2018/02, February 2018 Abstract This paper applies the concepts of hegemony and hybridity as analytical tools to help understand the structural changes taking place within the Eastern Partnership (EaP) countries and beyond. The author points to the split identities of many post-Soviet societies and the growing appeal of solutions aimed at balancing Russia’s or the EU’s dominance as important factors shaping EaP dynamics. Against this background, he explores how the post-Soviet borderlands can find their place in a still hypothetical pan-European space, and free themselves from the tensions of their competing hegemons. The EaP is divided into those countries that signed Association Agreements with the EU and those preferring to maintain their loyalty to Eurasian integration. Bringing the two groups closer together, however, is not beyond policy imagination. The policy-oriented part of this analysis focuses on a set of ideas and schemes aimed at enhancing interaction and blurring divisions between these countries. The author proposes five scenarios that might shape the future of EaP countries’ relations with the EU and with Russia: 1) the conflictual status quo in which both hegemonic powers will seek to weaken the position of the other; 2) trilateralism (EU, Russia plus an EaP country), which has been tried and failed, but still is considered as a possible option by some policy analysts; 3) the Kazakhstan-Armenia model of diplomatic advancement towards the EU, with some potential leverage on Russia; 4) deeper engagement by the EU with the Eurasian Economic Union, which has some competences for tariffs and technical standards; and 5) the decoupling of security policies from economic projects, which is so far the most difficult option to foresee and implement in practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Letter to G20 Finance Ministers
    13 July 2020 OPEN LETTER TO G20 FINANCE MINISTERS Global business, workers and civil society call for comprehensive emergency debt relief to enable developing countries to combat the COVID-19 pandemic Dear Finance Ministers, We are writing further to our joint letter sent on 10 April 2020, which called on G20 Governments to take international debt out of the equation in the fight against COVID-19 ahead of the Spring Meetings of the World Bank Group (WBG) and International Monetary Fund (IMF). On behalf of business, workers and civil society throughout the world, we would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your leadership in establishing the Debt Service Suspension Initiative (DSSI)—and, moreover, applaud the commitment made by several governments to replenish the IMF Catastrophe Containment and Relief Trust (CCRT) and Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust. For the real economy and society at large, this package of measures was a welcome signal of the G20’s overarching commitment to eliminate any risk of disorderly sovereign debt crises compounding the human and economic toll of COVID-19. It is increasingly clear, however, that your leadership is urgently required to decisively deliver on this imperative. With the global economy facing an even deeper downturn than projected in April, decisive and comprehensive action is now needed to ensure that debt service does not prevent developing economy governments from protecting the lives and livelihoods of their citizens in the face of the pandemic. We are especially concerned by the growing number of countries already facing or at risk of debt distress—including many countries that are not currently within the scope of the DSSI, whose economies have been highly exposed to the external shocks precipitated by COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • Sauli Niinistö – Tasavallan Presidentti Risto Uimonen Sauli Niinistö – Tasavallan Presidentti
    sauli niinistö – tasavallan presidentti Risto Uimonen sauli niinistö – tasavallan presidentti werner söderström osakeyhtiö helsinki © Risto Uimonen ja WSOY 2018 ISBN 978-951-0-43107-8 Painettu EU:ssa Lapsenlapsilleni Lotalle (4 v.) ja Nupulle (3 v.) Sisällys 11 | LUKIJALLE 17 | SISÄÄNAJO UUTEEN TYÖHÖN Valtarakenteet murtuvat 19 Symboliikkaa eduskunnan portailla 24 Suomen vähävaltaisin presidentti 27 Presidentin tulkintaoikeus 35 Valtionpää arvojohtajana 43 Sammon ryöstö 49 55 | ULKOPOLITIIKAN JOHTAJA Idänsuhteiden painoarvo 57 Niinistö paljastaa karvansa 65 Juhannus Pietarissa 74 Kovaa substanssia yllin kyllin 81 Presidentti hakee ja löytää linjan 89 Ikävyyksiä itänaapurin kanssa 95 Tappio Luxemburgille 101 Islannin ilmavalvontakiista 108 Isännän ote lujittuu 117 Kylmä todellisuus vastassa 127 Yllätysmatka Sotshiin ja Kiovaan 137 Niinistöstä kypsyy ulkopoliitikko 142 151 | LISÄTURVAA ULKOMAILTA Poliittista Nato-retoriikkaa 153 Tekoja puheiden takana 164 Avunanto ja vastaanotto 175 Onttoja eurooppalaisia sitoumuksia 182 Suomalais-ruotsalaista veljeilyä 189 201 | VENÄJÄ – KOLMAS PILARI Suoraa puhetta Putinille 203 Puun ja kuoren välissä 215 Merkillinen vuoto itärajalla 223 Presidentit Punkaharjulla 228 235 | PRESIDENTTI JA EDUSKUNTA Tiivistä yhteydenpitoa valiokuntien kanssa 237 Taiten junailtu isäntämaasopimus 247 Puoluejohtajat hienovaraisessa ohjauksessa 258 269 | KOLME HALLITUSTA Pääministerit ulkopolitiikan johtajina 271 Korkean tason moitteita 279 Puheenjohtajan etuotto-oikeus 287 Keskustajohtajasta pääministeri 293 Täs siul on sellane
    [Show full text]
  • THE JUNCKER COMMISSION: an Early Assessment
    THE JUNCKER COMMISSION: An Early Assessment John Peterson University of Edinburgh Paper prepared for the 14th Biennial Conference of the EU Studies Association, Boston, 5-7th February 2015 DRAFT: Not for citation without permission Comments welcome [email protected] Abstract This paper offers an early evaluation of the European Commission under the Presidency of Jean-Claude Juncker, following his contested appointment as the so-called Spitzencandidat of the centre-right after the 2014 European Parliament (EP) election. It confronts questions including: What will effect will the manner of Juncker’s appointment have on the perceived legitimacy of the Commission? Will Juncker claim that the strength his mandate gives him license to run a highly Presidential, centralised Commission along the lines of his predecessor, José Manuel Barroso? Will Juncker continue to seek a modest and supportive role for the Commission (as Barroso did), or will his Commission embrace more ambitious new projects or seek to re-energise old ones? What effect will British opposition to Juncker’s appointment have on the United Kingdom’s efforts to renegotiate its status in the EU? The paper draws on a round of interviews with senior Commission officials conducted in early 2015 to try to identify patterns of both continuity and change in the Commission. Its central aim is to assess the meaning of answers to the questions posed above both for the Commission and EU as a whole in the remainder of the decade. What follows is the proverbial ‘thought piece’: an analysis that seeks to provoke debate and pose the right questions about its subject, as opposed to one that offers many answers.
    [Show full text]
  • President High Representative
    First Vice-President High Representative Frans Timmermans Federica Mogherini Better Regulation, Inter-Institutional High Representative of the Union Relations, the Rule of Law and the for Foreign Affairs and Security Poli- Charter of Fundamental Rights cy / Vice-President of the PRESIDENT Commission Vice-President JEAN-CLAUDE JUNCKER Vice-President Kristalina Georgieva Andrus Ansip Vice-President Vice-President Budget & Human Resources Digital Single Market Vice-President Alenka Bratušek Valdis Dombrovskis Jyrki Katainen Energy Union Euro & Social Dialogue Jobs, Growth, Investment and Competitiveness Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Vĕra Jourová Günther Oettinger Pierre Moscovici Marianne Thyssen Corina Creţu Johannes Hahn Justice, Consumers and Gender Digital Economy & Society Economic and Financial Affairs, Employment, Social Affairs, Regional Policy European Neighbourhood Policy Equality Taxation and Customs Skills and Labour Mobility & Enlargement Negotiations Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Dimitris Avramopoulos Vytenis Andriukaitis Jonathan Hill Elżbieta Bieńkowska Miguel Arias Cañete Neven Mimica Financial Stability, Financial Services and Health & Food Safety Migration & Home Affairs Capital Markets Union Internal Market, Industry, Climate Action & Energy International Cooperation Entrepreneurship and SMEs & Development Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Margrethe Vestager Maroš Šefčovič Cecilia Malmström Karmenu Vella Competition Transport & Space Trade Environment, Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Tibor Navracsics Carlos Moedas Phil Hogan Christos Stylianides * The HRVP may ask the Commissioner Education, Culture, Youth and Research, Science Agriculture & Humanitarian Aid & (and other commissioners) to deputise Citizenship and Innovation Rural Development Crisis Management for her in areas related to Commission competence.
    [Show full text]