DOCSLIB.ORG

H-Diplo Review Essay 199 on Gordon. War Tourism. Second World War France from Defeat and Occupation to the Creation of Heritage

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
H-Diplo Review Essay 199 on Gordon. War Tourism. Second World War France from Defeat and Occupation to the Creation of Heritage H-Diplo H-Diplo Review Essay 199 on Gordon. War Tourism. Second World War France from Defeat and Occupation to the Creation of Heritage Discussion published by George Fujii on Thursday, March 5, 2020 H-Diplo Review Essay 199 5 March 2020 Bertram M. Gordon. War Tourism. Second World War France from Defeat and Occupation to the Creation of Heritage. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2018. ISBN: 9781501715877 (hardcover, $42.95). https://hdiplo.org/to/E199 Review Editor: Diane Labrosse | Production Editor: George Fujii Review by Donald Reid, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill "War tourism,” the title of Bertram M. Gordon’s book on the experience and memory of World War II in France, is an awkward phrase, but this awkwardness signals to the reader the breadth of Gordon’s project. For the chapters on the war, he uses tourism in the conventional sense, if in the unconventional situations of the visits the Germans took to sites in occupied France and excursions of the French in occupied France. Some French took advantage of the paid holidays that were introduced by the Popular Front and maintained during the war, while others added to the activities in prewar Michelin guides what Caroline Moorehead inVillage of Secrets refers to ironically as tourisme alimentaire, the starving French going to bargain with farmers that was a complement to the gastronomic tourism of German officers in occupied Paris. Moorehead also shows how prewar tourism to Le Chambon-sur-Lignon had introduced some French to people and places that provided them otherwise unattainable security during the Occupation.[1] If the tour of Europe was originally reserved for those who could afford to benefit by such interruptions to their lives, the German soldiers’ tour of duty— ‘join the army and see the world’ in British parlance—extended the activity to less elevated social groups. In a shock to readers, Gordon says that some French who did forced labor service in Germany had “their tourism moments” as well. (96) Yet what sets Gordon’s work apart is that he makes curiosity, not necessarily physical displacement, a key to touristic behaviors. He draws on the theoretical literature on tourism to extend the concept of tourists to Parisians who watched German military parades in their city in 1940 and, four years later, observed the victory parade led by Charles de Gaulle down the Champs- Elysées. In his examination of the Germans during their first years in occupied France, Gordon develops the concept of tourism beyond that of a business or of activities for German soldiers who were on rest and relaxation tours away from the eastern front. He argues that tourism is experienced through “tourism imaginaries.” (11) The Germans came to France with the idea that it was an important, if Citation: George Fujii. H-Diplo Review Essay 199 on Gordon. War Tourism. Second World War France from Defeat and Occupation to the Creation of Heritage. H-Diplo. 03-05-2020. https://networks.h-net.org/node/28443/discussions/5920320/h-diplo-review-essay-199-gordon-war-tourism-second-world-war Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-Diplo antiquated, site of European culture; the invaders believed that they showed their own high culture by recognizing this. The Germans presented themselves as the energetic, modern inheritors of this culture and took the opportunity to tell the French what they were doing to protect buildings and objects from damage in war. Gordon quite rightly contrasts the German recognition of a cultural heritage in France in which they could place themselves with the consequences of their rejection of such an interpretation in dealing with Poland. But this tourism imaginary valued sites in France, not the defeated French themselves; the Germans asserted their superiority by criticizing the decadence of French culture. Touring France, German authorities believed, made Germans feel more German and more proud. Gordon does not just assert the existence of this imaginary. He suggests its role in central events at the beginning and the end of the Occupation. Why in June 1940 did Germany not sweep through France and ally with Franco’s Spain to take Gibraltar and cut the United Kingdom off from the western Mediterranean? Gordon posits that Adolf Hitler was fixated on an earlier war memory from the First World War. He toured World War I battlefields and sought to show that he dominated the places he visited in Paris. Germany signed the armistice with France in June 1940 in the same railway car in Compiègne in which Germany had signed the armistice in November 1918. In July 1940, Hitler declared that France would “become a country of tourism.” (100) Gordon contends that Hitler’s celebratory tours of battlegrounds and of Paris “helped postpone any further serious German offensive either against England or to the south until it was too late.” (61) The Compiègne railway car did not survive the war, but, despite Hitler’s orders to destroy Paris in 1944, Paris did not suffer the fate of Warsaw. Though the story may have been embellished over time, in its canonical telling, a member of the Paris municipal council took General Dietrich von Choltitz out on a balcony with a view of the Place de la Concorde and asked him to imagine looking out over Paris in the future “as a tourist.” (145) The general then decided to disobey Hitler and save Paris. Another story of a political leader threatening to destroy the cultural sites of a nation, and the military leadership refusing to do so is playing out as I write this review, although what impeded the American military in Iran was international law, not the sense that an American would ever visit these sites as a tourist. Gordon recognizes that the tourist imaginary in occupied France replicated elements of the colonial experience. However, the cultural and political relations between one-time opponents before and after World War II made the postwar tourism Gordon examines particular to a conflict like World War II in Europe. It will not have cognates for Europeans and Americans in Algeria, Afghanistan, or Iraq. There is an element of this imaginary that Gordon does not directly address. Is war tourism a gendered concept, not only for many war tourists—men remembering when they were men—, but in its discursive construction? At one point, Gordon hypothesizes that if the ratio of male to female history professors were to change, this would change the gender distribution of visits to historical sites. (211) Perhaps, but such a phenomenon would not be specific to war-related sites. During the Occupation, the large number of POWs and primarily male French laborers in Germany made the population of occupied France disproportionately female. Gordon recognizes that German and later American troops came to France with sexual fantasies about French women, but that these troops were primarily composed of young men only reinforced a situation inherent in many forms of tourism: the nation that sends tourists is gendered male and where they go and are looked after is gendered feminine. A typical tourist tract of 1941 directed to Germans featured “an attractive young woman in Citation: George Fujii. H-Diplo Review Essay 199 on Gordon. War Tourism. Second World War France from Defeat and Occupation to the Creation of Heritage. H-Diplo. 03-05-2020. https://networks.h-net.org/node/28443/discussions/5920320/h-diplo-review-essay-199-gordon-war-tourism-second-world-war Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2 H-Diplo French peasant costume standing at the seashore.” (128) Not surprisingly, the scene the municipal councilor showed von Choltitz of what he could save features “an attractive young woman riding by on her bicycle, children sailing their boats in the Tuileries pond,” but no men. (144) Gordon does not devote a lot of attention to service personnel in tourist economies. However, the cruel act of watching as “the objects of tourist curiosity” (6) the post-liberation parades of women in one’s community whose heads had been shaved because they had slept with Germans could be interpreted as a gendered response to the shame attributed to one form of tourist culture in occupied France. Just as Gordon’s examination of Germans in occupied France takes readers beyond a political and economic history to address the ways that Germans experienced France in terms of the cultural representations they brought with them, Gordon develops the concept of the site of memory by integrating it with the political and economic histories of areas of postwar France. Gordon locates historically the interaction of memory and practices of tourism at the Maginot Line, and in Normandy, Paris and elsewhere for national and international visitors. He devotes particular attention to lingering Pétainophiles and to the situation of Vichy, a prewar tourist site that has struggled with the dramatic decline in spa tourism. It is no longer frequented by colonial officials on leave or covered by the state health insurance, and has had to deal with a bad brand name inherited from the Occupation. Gordon places developments at Vichy and elsewhere in the context of the conflicts within France over the memory of the Occupation and the war. He shows that there is an international dimension to this history as well. Gordon agrees with the historian Friedhelm Boll that the elements of the commemorative sites at Normandy that appeal to Anglo-American tourists maintain the feeling and value of the ongoing conflict in which battles took place (156-157). This, Boll and Gordon aver, is very unlike the call for peace and reconciliation that marked Franco-German World War I sites like Verdun or the interpretive goals of World War II sites like the Caen Memorial- Museum of Peace.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fighting Patton Photographs
    Fighting Patton Photographs [A]Mexican Punitive Expedition pershing-villa-obregon.tif: Patton’s first mortal enemy was the commander of Francisco “Pancho” Villa’s bodyguard during the Mexican Punitive Expedition. Left to right: General Álvaro Obregón, Villa, Brig. Gen. John Pershing, Capt. George Patton. [A]World War I Patton_France_1918.tif: Col. George Patton with one of his 1st Tank Brigade FT17s in France in 1918. Diepenbroick-Grüter_Otto Eitel_Friedrich.tif: Prince Freiherr von.tif: Otto Freiherr Friedrich Eitel commanded the von Diepenbroick-Grüter, 1st Guards Division in the pictured as a cadet in 1872, Argonnes. commanded the 10th Infantry Division at St. Mihiel. Gallwitz_Max von.tif: General Wilhelm_Crown Prince.tif: Crown der Artillerie Max von Prince Wilhelm commanded the Gallwitz’s army group defended region opposite the Americans. the St. Mihiel salient. [A]Morocco and Vichy France Patton_Hewitt.tif: Patton and Rear Admiral Henry Kent Hewitt, commanding Western Naval Task Force, aboard the Augusta before invading Vichy-controlled Morocco in Operation Torch. NoguesLascroux: Arriving at Fedala to negotiate an armistice at 1400 on 11 November 1942, Gen. Charles Noguès (left) is met by Col. Hobart Gay. Major General Auguste Lahoulle, Commander of French Air Forces in Morocco, is on the right. Major General Georges Lascroux, Commander in Chief of Moroccan troops, carries a briefcase. Noguès_Charles.tif: Charles Petit_Jean.tif: Jean Petit, Noguès, was Vichy commander- commanded the garrison at in-chief in Morocco. Port Lyautey. (Courtesy of Stéphane Petit) [A]The Axis Powers Patton_Monty.tif: Patton and his rival Gen. Bernard Montgomery greet each other on Sicily in July 1943. The two fought the Axis powers in Tunisia, Sicily, and the European theater.
    [Show full text]
  • The Allies Who Liberated Paris, and the Nazi Who Saved It
    The Washington Post August 25, 2019 The Allies who liberated Paris, and the Nazi who saved it Book Review The Liberation of Paris by Jean Edward Smith Simon & Schuster, $27, 242 pp. by Charles Trueheart American troops march down the Champs Elysee after the liberation of Paris in July 1944. (Photo by: dpa/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images) We know better than to believe that the war against Nazi Germany in Europe came to an end 75 summers ago with the Allied landings on the Normandy beaches of France. The war went on for nearly another grueling year, of course, there and in the Pacific. Yet Operation Overlord, on June 6, 1944, is rightly memorialized — for its audacity, its consequences, its enormous sacrifice on behalf of a beleaguered ally and an embattled principle — as the turning point. Some of that climactic finality clings to D-Day’s inspiring coda, 11 weeks later: the surrender of Nazi-occupied Paris to Allied and French forces. The liberation of Paris in the last days of August was a near-miracle of orderly capitulation that left nearly all of the venerated city and nearly all of its people unharmed. The liberation represented not just the end of the city’s darkest hour, with rapturous pent-up joy in the streets, but the very birth of modern France, the founding moment of the era that Charles de Gaulle would define and dominate. And it thrust Dwight D. Eisenhower, not for the last time, into the role of diplomat and political crisis manager. The loathing that President Franklin Roosevelt, and to a slightly lesser extent British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, held for the self-appointed leader of the Free French is no secret and no surprise.
    [Show full text]
  • The Germans in France During World War II: Defeat, Occupation, Liberation, and Memory UCB-OLLI Bert Gordon [email protected] Winter 2020
    The Germans in France During World War II: Defeat, Occupation, Liberation, and Memory UCB-OLLI Bert Gordon [email protected] Winter 2020 Introduction Collaboration, Resistance, Survival: The Germans in France During World War II - Defeat, Occupation, Liberation, and Memory Shortly before being executed for having collaborated with Nazi Germany during the German occupation of France in the Second World War, the French writer Robert Brasillach wrote that “Frenchmen given to reflection, during these years, will have more or less slept with Germany—not without quarrels—and the memory of it will remain sweet for them.” Brasillach’s statement shines a light on a highly charged and complex period: the four-year occupation of France by Nazi Germany from 1940 through 1944. In the years since the war, the French have continued to discuss and debate the experiences of those who lived through the war and their meanings for identity and memory in France. On 25 August 2019, a new museum, actually a transfer and extension of a previously existing museum in Paris, was opened to commemorate the 75th anniversary of the liberation of the French capital. Above: German Servicewomen in Occupied Paris Gordon, The Germans in France During World War II: Defeat, Occupation, Liberation, and Memory Our course examines the Occupation in six two-hour meetings. Each class session will have a theme, subdivided into two halves with a ten-minute break in between. Class Schedule: 1. From Victory to Defeat: France emerges victorious after the First World War but fails to maintain its supremacy. 1-A. The Interwar Years: We focus on France’s path from victory in the First World War through their failure to successfully resist the rise of Nazi Germany during the interwar years and their overwhelming defeat in the Second.
    [Show full text]
  • World War II: People, Politics, and Power / Edited by William L Hosch
    Published in 2010 by Britannica Educational Publishing (a trademark of Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.) in association with Rosen Educational Services, LLC 29 East 21st Street, New York, NY 10010. Copyright © 2010 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, and the Thistle logo are registered trademarks of Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. All rights reserved. Rosen Educational Services materials copyright © 2010 Rosen Educational Services, LLC. All rights reserved. Distributed exclusively by Rosen Educational Services. For a listing of additional Britannica Educational Publishing titles, call toll free (800) 237-9932. First Edition Britannica Educational Publishing Michael I. Levy: Executive Editor Marilyn L. Barton: Senior Coordinator, Production Control Steven Bosco: Director, Editorial Technologies Lisa S. Braucher: Senior Producer and Data Editor Yvette Charboneau: Senior Copy Editor Kathy Nakamura: Manager, Media Acquisition William L. Hosch: Associate Editor, Science and Technology Rosen Educational Services Hope Lourie Killcoyne: Senior Editor and Project Manager Joanne Randolph: Editor Nelson Sá: Art Director Matthew Cauli: Designer Introduction by Therese Shea Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data World War II: people, politics, and power / edited by William L Hosch. p. cm.—(America at war) “In association with Britannica Educational Publishing, Rosen Educational Services.” Includes index. ISBN 978-1-61530-046-4 (eBook) 1. World War, 1939–1945—Juvenile literature. I. Hosch, William L. II. Title:
    [Show full text]
  • Obeying Orders: Atrocity, Military Discipline, and the Law of War
    California Law Review VOL. 86 OCTOBER 1998 No. 5 Copyright © 1998 by California Law Review, Inc. Obeying Orders: Atrocity, Military Discipline, and the Law of War Mark J. Osielt TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ..................................................................................... 944 General Background ......................................................................... 946 A. Genealogy of Terms ............................................................. 951 B. "Cracking the Culture" of the "Separate Community" ...... 953 C. Civilian and Military Approaches to Legal Error ................... 959 D. Current Law as Compromise ................................................. 961 E. Why Ever Excuse Obedience to Illegal Orders? ............ .. .......965 I. Obedience to Superior Orders: The Uncertain Scope of Manifest Illegality ....................................................................... 969 A. The Nature of the Defense .................................................... 971 Copyright © 1998 California Law Review, Inc. t Mark J. Osiel, Professor of Law, University of Iowa. J.D., Ph.D., Harvard University, 1987. For their helpful comments, I would like to thank Steven Burton, Eliot A. Cohen, Mary Dudziak, Sir Michael Howard, Kenneth Kress, Col. Howard Levie, Lt. Col. Mark Martins, John Norton Moore, Maj. Gen. A.P.V. Rogers, Tina Rosenberg, Col. Scott Silliman, Robert F. Turner, Detlev Vagts, Lea Vandervelde, and the participants in faculty seminars at Stanford and the University of Iowa. Conversations with several leading Judge Advocate General (hereinafter JAG) officers and civilian Defense Department lawyers, whose anonymity must be preserved, proved invaluable. Discussions with Carlos Nino and Jaime Malamud-Goti, while they were prosecuting officers for crimes arising from Argentina's "dirty war," were also very helpful. I am grateful to several members of legal academia who were willing, on condition of anonymity, to share some rather unflattering tales of their own military activities during World War II and the Korean War.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle for the Ruhr: the German Army's Final Defeat in the West" (2006)
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2006 Battle for the Ruhr: The rGe man Army's Final Defeat in the West Derek Stephen Zumbro Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Zumbro, Derek Stephen, "Battle for the Ruhr: The German Army's Final Defeat in the West" (2006). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 2507. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/2507 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. BATTLE FOR THE RUHR: THE GERMAN ARMY’S FINAL DEFEAT IN THE WEST A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Derek S. Zumbro B.A., University of Southern Mississippi, 1980 M.S., University of Southern Mississippi, 2001 August 2006 Table of Contents ABSTRACT...............................................................................................................................iv INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Art Historians and Nazi Plunder
    Jonathan Petropoulos Art Historiansand Nazi Plunder -Imagine the thoughts that passed through the mind of Kajetan Muhlmann in June 1941 as he sat in the first-class compartment of the Reichsbahn train carrying him from Cracow to Berlin. Next to him, wrapped tightly in protective packaging, were three paintings: Raphael's Portrait of a Gentleman, Leonardo da Vinci's Lady with an Ermine, and Rembrandt's Landscape with the Good Samaritan. They were three of the most prized artworks in Poland- taken from the Czartoryski family's collection - and they were in his personal care. Mûhlmann, it would seem, had very mixed emotions as he watched the Polish countryside pass outside the window. On the one hand, he was a Nazi, a German nationalist, and took great satisfaction in the notion that these masterpieces, these examplesof "Aryan"superiority, were returning heim ins Reich ("home to the Reich"). Muhlmann later testified about the excitement he felt merely transporting these masterpieces and the prospect of reporting their arrivalin Berlin to Reichsmarschall Hermann Goring, his patron and protector, undoubtedly enhanced this sentiment. Goring was then at the height of his power and had undeniable presence. To be summoned by the Reichsmarschall to his grandiose Carinhall estate was a heady experience that helped bolster Muhlmann's ego and made him feel a part of the Nazi elite. Yet his excitement and self-satisfaction were tempered by a certain frustration and dread. This was now the second trip to hand over these paintings: after the first deliveryto Berlin, when Goring had stored the works in the KaiserFriedrich Museum, General Governor Hans Frank, another of his superiors, had responded by ordering them returned to Cracow, and Mûhlmann had complied.
    [Show full text]
  • Anticipating Overlord
    Anticipating Overlord ANTICIPATING OVERLORD INTELLIGENCE AND DECEPTION: GERMAN ESTIMATES OF ALLIED INTENTIONS TO LAND INVASION FORCES IN NORTHWEST EUROPE BY CAPTAIN THOMAS LEON CUBBAGE II MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BRANCH, U.S. ARMY A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GENERAL INTELLIGENCE DEPARTMENT DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE SCHOOL, WASHINGTON, D.C. 06 JUNE 1969 (Re-Typed and Edited: 15 March 2016) Anticipating Overlord Table of Contents CHAPTER PAGE I INTRODUCTION …………………………………………….………….…….. 1 II GERMAN PLANS 1939-40 ……………………………….…….…….….….. 7 III ENGLISH INVASION PLANS 1940-41 ……………………….……….….. 11 IV GERMAN PLANS & ESTIMATES 1941 …………………………………... 14 V ALLIED INVASION PLANNING 1942 …………….……………………..… 17 VI GERMAN PLANS & ESTIMATES 1942 ……………………………….….. 20 VII ALLIED PLANS & DECEPTION OPS 1943 ..…………………….…….… 28 VIII GERMAN PLANS & ESTIMATES 1943 ……………….…………….….... 37 IX “FORTITUDE” – THE ALLIED DECEPTION PLAN ……….…...……,.…. 52 X ALLIED PLANNING: JANUARY THRU APRIL 1944………….…….….... 62 XI GERMAN PLANS & ESTIMATES: JANUARY THRU APRIL ……...….... 73 XII ALLIED INVASION PLANNING MAY 1944 ……………………...……….. 95 XIII GERMAN PLANS & ESTIMATES MAY 1944 ………………….…….…. 103 XIV THE FIRST FOUR DAYS OF JUNE 1944 ………………………….…… 122 XV THE LAST DAY BEFORE THE INVASION …………………………..…. 140 XVI D-DAY, TUESDAY, THE 6TH OF JUNE 1944 (0000 to 0530 Hours) …. 156 XVII D-DAY, TUESDAY, THE 6TH OF JUNE 1944 (0530 to 2400 Hours) …. 173 XVIII AFTERMATH — 7 JUNE THRU 25 JULY 1944 …………………….….. 190 XIX REVIEW OF GERMAN COLLECTION, ANALYSIS AND ESTIMATES CAPABILITY………………………...…………………... 217 XX ROOTS OF THE GERMAN INTELLIGENCE FAILURE RE UNDERSTANDING D-DAY ….…………………………………… 225 XXI IMPLICATIONS OF THE GERMAN INTELLIGENCE FAILURE …..…. 236 i Anticipating Overlord BIBLIOGRAPHY ………………………………………………….………………... 239 Appendixes …………………………………………………………………...…….. 251 A. Table of Equivalent Ranks ……………………………………….………… 251 B. Glossary of German Individuals Appearing in this Paper ………..……... 252 C. Glossary of Code Names and Short Titles …………………………….… 255 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalleutnant Hans Graf Von Sponeck (1888–1944) Und Das Schicksal Der Juden in Der Ukraine, Juni–Dezember 1941*
    Aufsatz Erik Grimmer-Solem »Selbständiges verantwortliches Handeln«. Generalleutnant Hans Graf von Sponeck (1888–1944) und das Schicksal der Juden in der Ukraine, Juni–Dezember 1941* Generalleutnant Hans Graf von Sponeck ist durch den eigenmächtigen Rückzug seiner Truppen von der Halbinsel Kertsch auf der Krim am 29. Dezember 1941 be- rühmt geworden. Er befahl den Rückzug ohne Rücksprache mit dem Oberbefehls- haber der 11. Armee und dem Führerhauptquartier, um die drohende Einkreisung der 46. Infanterie-Division zu verhindern. Am 31. Dezember 1941 wurde Sponeck seines Amtes enthoben und am 23. Januar 1942 in einem Kriegsgerichtverfahren wegen »fahrlässigen Ungehorsams im Felde« zum Tode verurteilt. Hitler wandelte die Todesstrafe in sechs Jahre Festungshaft um1. Im Zuge der Vergeltung nach dem missglückten Attentat auf Hitler am 20. Juli 1944 wurde Sponeck auf Befehl Hein- rich Himmlers in der Festung Germersheim am 23. Juli 1944 ohne standrechtliches Urteil erschossen2. In der Nachkriegszeit wurde von Sponeck posthum geehrt. So in Germersheim wo die General-Hans-Graf-Sponeck-Kaserne bereits 1966 seinen Namen erhielt; in Neustrelitz, Parkstraße 3, hängt seit 1992 eine Gedenktafel am Zaun der Villa, in der Sponeck von 1935 bis 1937 lebte. In Bremen, Germersheim, München und in Sasbach-Jechtingen bei Freiburg wurden Straßen und Plätze nach ihm benannt. Im Jahr 2007 verlegte man im Rahmen eines Erinnerungsprojektes an die Opfer der NS-Gewaltherrschaft einen Stolperstein vor seiner alten Dienstwohnung in Bremen Horn-Lehe, Horner Heerstraße
    [Show full text]
  • The German Retreat from France, 1944 by Joachim Ludewig, Edited by Major General David T
    Rückzug: The German Retreat from France, 1944 by Joachim Ludewig, edited by Major General David T. Zabecki. University Press of Kentucky 2012. Rückzug is part of the University of Kentucky’s Foreign Military Studies series and is a work of impeccable scholarship on the collapse of Nazi rule in France following the Allied landings on the Normandy Beaches in June 1944. Joachim Ludewig, a civil servant at the German Defence Ministry and an officer in the German Army Reserve, divides his study into three sections, the sub-sections of which then analyse specific dimensions of the theme. The three parts are: The Initial Situation Facing OB West in the Middle of August 1944: The Situation in Northern France and the Allied Landings along the Mediterranean Coast; From the Retreat of the German Army in the West to the Climax of the Crisis: Combat Operations from August 20 to September 4, 1944; Developments from the Climax of the Crisis until the Transition to Positional Warfare in the West: Combat Operations in September 1944. In spite of the fact that Rückzug has nearly a hundred pages of notes and no less than twenty five maps this is by no means a dry academic text, indeed in view of the dramatic and crucial events that it describes it could never be so. The surrender of France was, for Hitler, one of his most important strategic achievements, and the loss of France was a very severe blow; this no doubt accounts for the order he gave to destroy Paris as part of the French retreat, an order that Dietrich von Choltitz, the Wehrmacht Commander in Paris, chose to ignore.
    [Show full text]
  • Nancy Gerstman & Emily Russo, Zeitgeist
    Theatrical & Festival Booking Contacts: Nancy Gerstman & Emily Russo, Zeitgeist Films [email protected] • [email protected] 212-274-1989 New York Press Contact: Adam Walker, Film Forum 212-627-2035 • [email protected] SYNOPSIS As the Allies march toward Paris in the summer of 1944, Hitler gives or- ders that the French capital should not fall into enemy hands, or if it does, then ‘only as a field of rubble’. The person assigned to carry out this bar- baric act is Wehrmacht commander of Greater Paris, General Dietrich von Choltitz, who already has mines planted on the Eiffel Tower, in the Louvre and Notre-Dame and on the bridges over the Seine. Nothing should be left as a reminder of the city’s former glory. However, at dawn on 25 August, Swedish Consul General Raoul Nordling steals into German headquarters through a secret underground tunnel and there starts a tension-filled game of cat and mouse as Nordling tries to persuade Choltitz to abandon his plan. In this passionate and emotional adaptation of the 2011 stage success by Cyril Gély, the great Volker Schlöndorff (Academy Award winner THE TIN DRUM) has created a psychologically elaborate game of political manners between two highly contrasting characters. While Choltitz entrenches him- self behind his duty to obey unquestioningly all military orders, Nordling tries everything he can to appeal to reason and humanity and prevent the senseless destruction of the beloved 'City of Lights'. Q&A WITH VOLKER SCHLONDORFF What drew you to the project? War places men in extreme situations and brings out the best and worst in humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • NEW ORLEANS NOSTALGIA Remembering New Orleans History, Culture and Traditions by Ned Hémard
    NEW ORLEANS NOSTALGIA Remembering New Orleans History, Culture and Traditions By Ned Hémard Two Cities of Light As the tenth anniversary of Hurricane Katrina approaches, New Orleanians once again set aside some time for retrospection. Katrina was a force by which countless dreams were postponed. Human beings were displaced or lost forever. Homes were damaged or completely lost. Many businesses and jobs were interrupted or ended, while some enterprising individuals found new opportunities. Some people lost family members or close friends, either from the devastating effects of the storm itself or from its psychological aftermath. As horrific as it all was, New Orleans is still here. Its historic buildings and landmarks were, for the most part, spared. The architectural gems of the French Quarter and Garden District; the St. Louis Cathedral, Cabildo and Prebytère flanked on each side by the Pontalba Apartments; the Superdome; the city’s parks, museums and churches were not all wiped out with one powerful stroke. Familiar New Orleans landmarks These monuments remain to remind us of the city’s rich cultural past and how this historic and romantic metropolis has endured the ravages of numerous tempests, yellow fever, war and occupation. That’s why it made us so angry when some voices, soon after Katrina, questioned the logic of our very existence. Another bleak August, back in 1944, another city was in danger of being totally annihilated. This time, that city’s proudest landmarks, public buildings and works of art were to be utterly and completely destroyed. That city was Paris, France, the “City of Light,” and in late August 1944 its future looked very dark indeed.
    [Show full text]