The Depression and World War II

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Depression and World War II The Depression and World War II By Ian Densford Featuring James E. Horn Glenn Whitman, AP History Densford 2 Table of Contents I. Contract Not included online II. Statement of Purpose 3 III. Biography 4 IV. Historical Contextualization 6 V. Transcript 21 VI. Analysis 39 VII. Works Consulted 47 Densford 3 Statement of Purpose The purpose of this interview is to learn about the depression and World War II era through what Mr. Jmnes Horn has experienced. It is important to know about this period because it directly preceded America at a time when it was about to drastically change its foreign policy. Densford 4 Biography: James E. Horn James Eden Horn was bom on December 4, 1921 in a small town in Arkansas. His parents moved to Washington DC in 1924; they had found life in Arkansas "limited." His father worked for the government and had a steady income of $1200 a year. His mother worked at a department store and earned $12 a week. Their first area of residence was in Southwest DC, in an efficiency apartment near where the current Agricultural Depmtment building is located. It had, what Mr. Horn referred to as, a "Murphy Bed," which was a bed in the wall that folded down. After living there for a short while, they moved to the 2100 block of F Street, Northwest DC, an area that is called Foggy Bottom. James attended high school at Western. He was put on the Second All-High Team for basketball by the school newspaper. Hitler invaded Poland when he was seventeen in 1939, but he knew or heard little about it. He won a French competition that same year, and was awarded with a third place metal by the French Ambassador. James was in his second year of college when the Japanese attacked Pearl Hmbor; he was listening to a Red Skins gmne when the announcer interrupted and reported what had happened. James went to college at the University Maryland, mid graduated with a degree in Chemistry. During those four yems, he played basketball, football, and he boxed. He played basketball in his freshman year, then took two years off to catch up with his schoolwork. When he returned to the team as a senior, he mostly played the bench. HE played football for one year under Clark Shawnasee, who cmne up with the T-formation. He boxed in the ROTC Tournament and made it to the semi-finals, but had to withdraw from an arm injury. He graduated from Maryland in 1943 and signed up for the draft. Densford 5 He took Qumtermaster basic training at Fort Lee, Virginia. Afterwards he took an aptitude test, earning a 144 out of 165. As a result, he was invited to pmticipate in the Army Specialized Training Program (ASTP). He then was sent to Cincinnati to take courses in engineering. The ASTP was abolished because ofthe need for every man in the war, so Jmnes went to Missouri to continue his courses in engineering. He left New York on June 30, 1944. He spent a few weeks in England before he went over to France. He was part of a replacement depot, but ended up with his own outfit because he spoke fluent French. He never ran into any combat, mid just missed the Battle ofthe Bulge in late 1944. He returned home in March of 1946. He lived with his pments until he could support himself. He was pmt ofthe 52 20 Club, a program in which the government gave veterans twenty dollars a week for a year. After deciding not to work for the government, James got involved in business, mid selling Real Estate later on. He got married in January of 1951 to one Conelia Ruth Hoffman. She was from Waynesburrow, Pennsylvania. They moved into a new three- floor house in 1957. Their house was 9512 Crosby Road, Silver Spring, Marylmid. They had five children together. Mr. Horn has lived on Crosby Road since his house was built in 1957. He lives a fairly busy life, exercising and attending dances regulmly. Densford 6 America in World War II World War II officially began in 1939 with Hitler's invasion of Poland. It has been considered both the best mid worst wm. Some thought it was a "good war" because it ended the depression in America and established it as a world power. Others thought it was one ofthe worst wars because it was a wm America really did not belong in, mid it brought about new massive weapons of destruction. In either case, America became involved in the war. Up until America entered the war. Hitler was fighting a successful war throughout Europe. It was not until the summer of 1944 that Hitler began to face significant loses. America's entrance into the Second World War was necessary because ofthe vital role it played in obtaining victory for the Allies. Fifty three million people were killed in the Second World War. Most of these deaths can be blamed on one man, Adolph Hitler, who was determined to restore Germany's pride and strength, which had been destroyed by World War Is treaty. As said by Hitler, "the Treaty of Versailles was the document of German humiliation," and he wanted revenge for the disgrace his country had to bear. The treaty had split the Austro-Hungarian Empire; Hitler wanted to rejoin it, establishing a Third Reich. In order to achieve this, he needed to reinstate strong nationalism and have the complete support ofthe German people. The National Socialist German Worker, or Nazi, Pmty gave him a position that allowed him to speak out against the current government and be heard, even supported. The First World War gave him propaganda, something that would stir the hearts of German citizens. After the depression hit Europe, shortly after WWI, Hitler took the opportunity to win the people over and shut down the failing Weimm Republic, which had little support because ofthe extreme economic decisions it had made. Hitler Densford 7 blamed the Treaty of Versailles as the cause of Germany's depression; some six million voters backed him. His popularity grew and he became Chmicellor of Germany in 1933, the same year Franklin Roosevelt (FRD) became president, and eliminated all opposition. He won the support ofthe people the same way FDR did, by establishing government funded public projects, such as the construction ofthe Autobahn, Germmiy's super highway. After rallying enough support. Hitler began to make his moves in building his empire. In 1935, he announced that Germany would no longer have a small military, which was a violation of WWI's Treaty of Versailles. In 1936, he moved his Nazi troops into the demilitarized zone of Rhineland and began to fortify the area. He took over Austria without firing a shot in 1938, mid allied himself with the fascist dictator of Italy, Benito Mussolini. That same year, representatives of Germany, Italy, France, and Britain held the Munich Conference. America's isolationist views prevented an American representative from attending. The meetings participants agreed on allowing Germany to keep the countries it had taken if it would stop expanding westward. In 1939, Germany signed the Non-Aggression Pact with Russia, ridding Hitler's fem of a two-front war. On September 1, 1939, Hitler invaded Poland, using his new Stuka dive-bomber planes and tanks to his advantage mid putting Blitzkrieg, or lightning warfare, into effect. Two days later, Frmice and Great Britain declared war on Germany. Though war was declared, no fighting occurred on the western front until 1940 because German mid Russian forces moved north, invading both Norway and Finlmid. On May 10, 1940, this "Phony War" ended, as the western front became active. Churchill became the Prime Minister the same day, after Chamberlain's retirement. Densford 8 In a month, Nazi forces had taken control ofthe countries surrounding the English Channel, besides Britain, having only been slowed down by a Imge resistance at The Hague. Hitler occupied Paris on June 13. On the twenty-second, France signed an armistice with Germany, permitting the Nazis to occupy half the country as well as the coast, while the French mmy was demobilized with a still existent government in unoccupied zones. Once Hitler had France, he planned to t^e Britain, code named Operation Sea Lion. The British Royal Air Force, the RAF, was greatly helped by the invention ofthe radar during the Battle of Britain. The Nazi Air Force, the Luftwaffe, commanded by General Hermmin Goring, began relentless assaults on the RAF bases in August, nearly wiping out their radar mid devastating their plmies. The Luftwaffe soon switched to civilimi tmgets. The Blitz, before the RAF bases were completely wiped out. The Blitz was a failure, it only made the British more determined to fight and made America more aware and interested in the wm. In December 1940, seeing that the western front was a stalemate. Hitler postponed Operation Sea Lion and tumed to expanding eastward. The British had won the Battle of Britain. The Nazi forces now moved straight through Yugoslavia mid into Greece; both countries surrendered in April of 1941. Hitler's plan was to now invade Russia, strongly believing that the defeat of Russia would bring the fall of Britain. It was called Operation Barbarossa, and it began in June of 1941. Many believe that if Hitler had not fought in the Balkans, Germany might have been able to capture Russia (Ambrose 101). The only thing that really hindered the Germans was the hmsh Russimi winter; a second assault could have been organized if America had not entered the wm.
Recommended publications
  • Fighting Patton Photographs
    Fighting Patton Photographs [A]Mexican Punitive Expedition pershing-villa-obregon.tif: Patton’s first mortal enemy was the commander of Francisco “Pancho” Villa’s bodyguard during the Mexican Punitive Expedition. Left to right: General Álvaro Obregón, Villa, Brig. Gen. John Pershing, Capt. George Patton. [A]World War I Patton_France_1918.tif: Col. George Patton with one of his 1st Tank Brigade FT17s in France in 1918. Diepenbroick-Grüter_Otto Eitel_Friedrich.tif: Prince Freiherr von.tif: Otto Freiherr Friedrich Eitel commanded the von Diepenbroick-Grüter, 1st Guards Division in the pictured as a cadet in 1872, Argonnes. commanded the 10th Infantry Division at St. Mihiel. Gallwitz_Max von.tif: General Wilhelm_Crown Prince.tif: Crown der Artillerie Max von Prince Wilhelm commanded the Gallwitz’s army group defended region opposite the Americans. the St. Mihiel salient. [A]Morocco and Vichy France Patton_Hewitt.tif: Patton and Rear Admiral Henry Kent Hewitt, commanding Western Naval Task Force, aboard the Augusta before invading Vichy-controlled Morocco in Operation Torch. NoguesLascroux: Arriving at Fedala to negotiate an armistice at 1400 on 11 November 1942, Gen. Charles Noguès (left) is met by Col. Hobart Gay. Major General Auguste Lahoulle, Commander of French Air Forces in Morocco, is on the right. Major General Georges Lascroux, Commander in Chief of Moroccan troops, carries a briefcase. Noguès_Charles.tif: Charles Petit_Jean.tif: Jean Petit, Noguès, was Vichy commander- commanded the garrison at in-chief in Morocco. Port Lyautey. (Courtesy of Stéphane Petit) [A]The Axis Powers Patton_Monty.tif: Patton and his rival Gen. Bernard Montgomery greet each other on Sicily in July 1943. The two fought the Axis powers in Tunisia, Sicily, and the European theater.
    [Show full text]
  • The Allies Who Liberated Paris, and the Nazi Who Saved It
    The Washington Post August 25, 2019 The Allies who liberated Paris, and the Nazi who saved it Book Review The Liberation of Paris by Jean Edward Smith Simon & Schuster, $27, 242 pp. by Charles Trueheart American troops march down the Champs Elysee after the liberation of Paris in July 1944. (Photo by: dpa/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images) We know better than to believe that the war against Nazi Germany in Europe came to an end 75 summers ago with the Allied landings on the Normandy beaches of France. The war went on for nearly another grueling year, of course, there and in the Pacific. Yet Operation Overlord, on June 6, 1944, is rightly memorialized — for its audacity, its consequences, its enormous sacrifice on behalf of a beleaguered ally and an embattled principle — as the turning point. Some of that climactic finality clings to D-Day’s inspiring coda, 11 weeks later: the surrender of Nazi-occupied Paris to Allied and French forces. The liberation of Paris in the last days of August was a near-miracle of orderly capitulation that left nearly all of the venerated city and nearly all of its people unharmed. The liberation represented not just the end of the city’s darkest hour, with rapturous pent-up joy in the streets, but the very birth of modern France, the founding moment of the era that Charles de Gaulle would define and dominate. And it thrust Dwight D. Eisenhower, not for the last time, into the role of diplomat and political crisis manager. The loathing that President Franklin Roosevelt, and to a slightly lesser extent British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, held for the self-appointed leader of the Free French is no secret and no surprise.
    [Show full text]
  • The Germans in France During World War II: Defeat, Occupation, Liberation, and Memory UCB-OLLI Bert Gordon [email protected] Winter 2020
    The Germans in France During World War II: Defeat, Occupation, Liberation, and Memory UCB-OLLI Bert Gordon [email protected] Winter 2020 Introduction Collaboration, Resistance, Survival: The Germans in France During World War II - Defeat, Occupation, Liberation, and Memory Shortly before being executed for having collaborated with Nazi Germany during the German occupation of France in the Second World War, the French writer Robert Brasillach wrote that “Frenchmen given to reflection, during these years, will have more or less slept with Germany—not without quarrels—and the memory of it will remain sweet for them.” Brasillach’s statement shines a light on a highly charged and complex period: the four-year occupation of France by Nazi Germany from 1940 through 1944. In the years since the war, the French have continued to discuss and debate the experiences of those who lived through the war and their meanings for identity and memory in France. On 25 August 2019, a new museum, actually a transfer and extension of a previously existing museum in Paris, was opened to commemorate the 75th anniversary of the liberation of the French capital. Above: German Servicewomen in Occupied Paris Gordon, The Germans in France During World War II: Defeat, Occupation, Liberation, and Memory Our course examines the Occupation in six two-hour meetings. Each class session will have a theme, subdivided into two halves with a ten-minute break in between. Class Schedule: 1. From Victory to Defeat: France emerges victorious after the First World War but fails to maintain its supremacy. 1-A. The Interwar Years: We focus on France’s path from victory in the First World War through their failure to successfully resist the rise of Nazi Germany during the interwar years and their overwhelming defeat in the Second.
    [Show full text]
  • World War II: People, Politics, and Power / Edited by William L Hosch
    Published in 2010 by Britannica Educational Publishing (a trademark of Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.) in association with Rosen Educational Services, LLC 29 East 21st Street, New York, NY 10010. Copyright © 2010 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, and the Thistle logo are registered trademarks of Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. All rights reserved. Rosen Educational Services materials copyright © 2010 Rosen Educational Services, LLC. All rights reserved. Distributed exclusively by Rosen Educational Services. For a listing of additional Britannica Educational Publishing titles, call toll free (800) 237-9932. First Edition Britannica Educational Publishing Michael I. Levy: Executive Editor Marilyn L. Barton: Senior Coordinator, Production Control Steven Bosco: Director, Editorial Technologies Lisa S. Braucher: Senior Producer and Data Editor Yvette Charboneau: Senior Copy Editor Kathy Nakamura: Manager, Media Acquisition William L. Hosch: Associate Editor, Science and Technology Rosen Educational Services Hope Lourie Killcoyne: Senior Editor and Project Manager Joanne Randolph: Editor Nelson Sá: Art Director Matthew Cauli: Designer Introduction by Therese Shea Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data World War II: people, politics, and power / edited by William L Hosch. p. cm.—(America at war) “In association with Britannica Educational Publishing, Rosen Educational Services.” Includes index. ISBN 978-1-61530-046-4 (eBook) 1. World War, 1939–1945—Juvenile literature. I. Hosch, William L. II. Title:
    [Show full text]
  • Obeying Orders: Atrocity, Military Discipline, and the Law of War
    California Law Review VOL. 86 OCTOBER 1998 No. 5 Copyright © 1998 by California Law Review, Inc. Obeying Orders: Atrocity, Military Discipline, and the Law of War Mark J. Osielt TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ..................................................................................... 944 General Background ......................................................................... 946 A. Genealogy of Terms ............................................................. 951 B. "Cracking the Culture" of the "Separate Community" ...... 953 C. Civilian and Military Approaches to Legal Error ................... 959 D. Current Law as Compromise ................................................. 961 E. Why Ever Excuse Obedience to Illegal Orders? ............ .. .......965 I. Obedience to Superior Orders: The Uncertain Scope of Manifest Illegality ....................................................................... 969 A. The Nature of the Defense .................................................... 971 Copyright © 1998 California Law Review, Inc. t Mark J. Osiel, Professor of Law, University of Iowa. J.D., Ph.D., Harvard University, 1987. For their helpful comments, I would like to thank Steven Burton, Eliot A. Cohen, Mary Dudziak, Sir Michael Howard, Kenneth Kress, Col. Howard Levie, Lt. Col. Mark Martins, John Norton Moore, Maj. Gen. A.P.V. Rogers, Tina Rosenberg, Col. Scott Silliman, Robert F. Turner, Detlev Vagts, Lea Vandervelde, and the participants in faculty seminars at Stanford and the University of Iowa. Conversations with several leading Judge Advocate General (hereinafter JAG) officers and civilian Defense Department lawyers, whose anonymity must be preserved, proved invaluable. Discussions with Carlos Nino and Jaime Malamud-Goti, while they were prosecuting officers for crimes arising from Argentina's "dirty war," were also very helpful. I am grateful to several members of legal academia who were willing, on condition of anonymity, to share some rather unflattering tales of their own military activities during World War II and the Korean War.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle for the Ruhr: the German Army's Final Defeat in the West" (2006)
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2006 Battle for the Ruhr: The rGe man Army's Final Defeat in the West Derek Stephen Zumbro Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Zumbro, Derek Stephen, "Battle for the Ruhr: The German Army's Final Defeat in the West" (2006). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 2507. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/2507 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. BATTLE FOR THE RUHR: THE GERMAN ARMY’S FINAL DEFEAT IN THE WEST A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Derek S. Zumbro B.A., University of Southern Mississippi, 1980 M.S., University of Southern Mississippi, 2001 August 2006 Table of Contents ABSTRACT...............................................................................................................................iv INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • H-Diplo Review Essay 199 on Gordon. War Tourism. Second World War France from Defeat and Occupation to the Creation of Heritage
    H-Diplo H-Diplo Review Essay 199 on Gordon. War Tourism. Second World War France from Defeat and Occupation to the Creation of Heritage Discussion published by George Fujii on Thursday, March 5, 2020 H-Diplo Review Essay 199 5 March 2020 Bertram M. Gordon. War Tourism. Second World War France from Defeat and Occupation to the Creation of Heritage. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2018. ISBN: 9781501715877 (hardcover, $42.95). https://hdiplo.org/to/E199 Review Editor: Diane Labrosse | Production Editor: George Fujii Review by Donald Reid, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill "War tourism,” the title of Bertram M. Gordon’s book on the experience and memory of World War II in France, is an awkward phrase, but this awkwardness signals to the reader the breadth of Gordon’s project. For the chapters on the war, he uses tourism in the conventional sense, if in the unconventional situations of the visits the Germans took to sites in occupied France and excursions of the French in occupied France. Some French took advantage of the paid holidays that were introduced by the Popular Front and maintained during the war, while others added to the activities in prewar Michelin guides what Caroline Moorehead inVillage of Secrets refers to ironically as tourisme alimentaire, the starving French going to bargain with farmers that was a complement to the gastronomic tourism of German officers in occupied Paris. Moorehead also shows how prewar tourism to Le Chambon-sur-Lignon had introduced some French to people and places that provided them otherwise unattainable security during the Occupation.[1] If the tour of Europe was originally reserved for those who could afford to benefit by such interruptions to their lives, the German soldiers’ tour of duty— ‘join the army and see the world’ in British parlance—extended the activity to less elevated social groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Art Historians and Nazi Plunder
    Jonathan Petropoulos Art Historiansand Nazi Plunder -Imagine the thoughts that passed through the mind of Kajetan Muhlmann in June 1941 as he sat in the first-class compartment of the Reichsbahn train carrying him from Cracow to Berlin. Next to him, wrapped tightly in protective packaging, were three paintings: Raphael's Portrait of a Gentleman, Leonardo da Vinci's Lady with an Ermine, and Rembrandt's Landscape with the Good Samaritan. They were three of the most prized artworks in Poland- taken from the Czartoryski family's collection - and they were in his personal care. Mûhlmann, it would seem, had very mixed emotions as he watched the Polish countryside pass outside the window. On the one hand, he was a Nazi, a German nationalist, and took great satisfaction in the notion that these masterpieces, these examplesof "Aryan"superiority, were returning heim ins Reich ("home to the Reich"). Muhlmann later testified about the excitement he felt merely transporting these masterpieces and the prospect of reporting their arrivalin Berlin to Reichsmarschall Hermann Goring, his patron and protector, undoubtedly enhanced this sentiment. Goring was then at the height of his power and had undeniable presence. To be summoned by the Reichsmarschall to his grandiose Carinhall estate was a heady experience that helped bolster Muhlmann's ego and made him feel a part of the Nazi elite. Yet his excitement and self-satisfaction were tempered by a certain frustration and dread. This was now the second trip to hand over these paintings: after the first deliveryto Berlin, when Goring had stored the works in the KaiserFriedrich Museum, General Governor Hans Frank, another of his superiors, had responded by ordering them returned to Cracow, and Mûhlmann had complied.
    [Show full text]
  • Anticipating Overlord
    Anticipating Overlord ANTICIPATING OVERLORD INTELLIGENCE AND DECEPTION: GERMAN ESTIMATES OF ALLIED INTENTIONS TO LAND INVASION FORCES IN NORTHWEST EUROPE BY CAPTAIN THOMAS LEON CUBBAGE II MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BRANCH, U.S. ARMY A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GENERAL INTELLIGENCE DEPARTMENT DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE SCHOOL, WASHINGTON, D.C. 06 JUNE 1969 (Re-Typed and Edited: 15 March 2016) Anticipating Overlord Table of Contents CHAPTER PAGE I INTRODUCTION …………………………………………….………….…….. 1 II GERMAN PLANS 1939-40 ……………………………….…….…….….….. 7 III ENGLISH INVASION PLANS 1940-41 ……………………….……….….. 11 IV GERMAN PLANS & ESTIMATES 1941 …………………………………... 14 V ALLIED INVASION PLANNING 1942 …………….……………………..… 17 VI GERMAN PLANS & ESTIMATES 1942 ……………………………….….. 20 VII ALLIED PLANS & DECEPTION OPS 1943 ..…………………….…….… 28 VIII GERMAN PLANS & ESTIMATES 1943 ……………….…………….….... 37 IX “FORTITUDE” – THE ALLIED DECEPTION PLAN ……….…...……,.…. 52 X ALLIED PLANNING: JANUARY THRU APRIL 1944………….…….….... 62 XI GERMAN PLANS & ESTIMATES: JANUARY THRU APRIL ……...….... 73 XII ALLIED INVASION PLANNING MAY 1944 ……………………...……….. 95 XIII GERMAN PLANS & ESTIMATES MAY 1944 ………………….…….…. 103 XIV THE FIRST FOUR DAYS OF JUNE 1944 ………………………….…… 122 XV THE LAST DAY BEFORE THE INVASION …………………………..…. 140 XVI D-DAY, TUESDAY, THE 6TH OF JUNE 1944 (0000 to 0530 Hours) …. 156 XVII D-DAY, TUESDAY, THE 6TH OF JUNE 1944 (0530 to 2400 Hours) …. 173 XVIII AFTERMATH — 7 JUNE THRU 25 JULY 1944 …………………….….. 190 XIX REVIEW OF GERMAN COLLECTION, ANALYSIS AND ESTIMATES CAPABILITY………………………...…………………... 217 XX ROOTS OF THE GERMAN INTELLIGENCE FAILURE RE UNDERSTANDING D-DAY ….…………………………………… 225 XXI IMPLICATIONS OF THE GERMAN INTELLIGENCE FAILURE …..…. 236 i Anticipating Overlord BIBLIOGRAPHY ………………………………………………….………………... 239 Appendixes …………………………………………………………………...…….. 251 A. Table of Equivalent Ranks ……………………………………….………… 251 B. Glossary of German Individuals Appearing in this Paper ………..……... 252 C. Glossary of Code Names and Short Titles …………………………….… 255 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalleutnant Hans Graf Von Sponeck (1888–1944) Und Das Schicksal Der Juden in Der Ukraine, Juni–Dezember 1941*
    Aufsatz Erik Grimmer-Solem »Selbständiges verantwortliches Handeln«. Generalleutnant Hans Graf von Sponeck (1888–1944) und das Schicksal der Juden in der Ukraine, Juni–Dezember 1941* Generalleutnant Hans Graf von Sponeck ist durch den eigenmächtigen Rückzug seiner Truppen von der Halbinsel Kertsch auf der Krim am 29. Dezember 1941 be- rühmt geworden. Er befahl den Rückzug ohne Rücksprache mit dem Oberbefehls- haber der 11. Armee und dem Führerhauptquartier, um die drohende Einkreisung der 46. Infanterie-Division zu verhindern. Am 31. Dezember 1941 wurde Sponeck seines Amtes enthoben und am 23. Januar 1942 in einem Kriegsgerichtverfahren wegen »fahrlässigen Ungehorsams im Felde« zum Tode verurteilt. Hitler wandelte die Todesstrafe in sechs Jahre Festungshaft um1. Im Zuge der Vergeltung nach dem missglückten Attentat auf Hitler am 20. Juli 1944 wurde Sponeck auf Befehl Hein- rich Himmlers in der Festung Germersheim am 23. Juli 1944 ohne standrechtliches Urteil erschossen2. In der Nachkriegszeit wurde von Sponeck posthum geehrt. So in Germersheim wo die General-Hans-Graf-Sponeck-Kaserne bereits 1966 seinen Namen erhielt; in Neustrelitz, Parkstraße 3, hängt seit 1992 eine Gedenktafel am Zaun der Villa, in der Sponeck von 1935 bis 1937 lebte. In Bremen, Germersheim, München und in Sasbach-Jechtingen bei Freiburg wurden Straßen und Plätze nach ihm benannt. Im Jahr 2007 verlegte man im Rahmen eines Erinnerungsprojektes an die Opfer der NS-Gewaltherrschaft einen Stolperstein vor seiner alten Dienstwohnung in Bremen Horn-Lehe, Horner Heerstraße
    [Show full text]
  • The German Retreat from France, 1944 by Joachim Ludewig, Edited by Major General David T
    Rückzug: The German Retreat from France, 1944 by Joachim Ludewig, edited by Major General David T. Zabecki. University Press of Kentucky 2012. Rückzug is part of the University of Kentucky’s Foreign Military Studies series and is a work of impeccable scholarship on the collapse of Nazi rule in France following the Allied landings on the Normandy Beaches in June 1944. Joachim Ludewig, a civil servant at the German Defence Ministry and an officer in the German Army Reserve, divides his study into three sections, the sub-sections of which then analyse specific dimensions of the theme. The three parts are: The Initial Situation Facing OB West in the Middle of August 1944: The Situation in Northern France and the Allied Landings along the Mediterranean Coast; From the Retreat of the German Army in the West to the Climax of the Crisis: Combat Operations from August 20 to September 4, 1944; Developments from the Climax of the Crisis until the Transition to Positional Warfare in the West: Combat Operations in September 1944. In spite of the fact that Rückzug has nearly a hundred pages of notes and no less than twenty five maps this is by no means a dry academic text, indeed in view of the dramatic and crucial events that it describes it could never be so. The surrender of France was, for Hitler, one of his most important strategic achievements, and the loss of France was a very severe blow; this no doubt accounts for the order he gave to destroy Paris as part of the French retreat, an order that Dietrich von Choltitz, the Wehrmacht Commander in Paris, chose to ignore.
    [Show full text]
  • Nancy Gerstman & Emily Russo, Zeitgeist
    Theatrical & Festival Booking Contacts: Nancy Gerstman & Emily Russo, Zeitgeist Films [email protected][email protected] 212-274-1989 New York Press Contact: Adam Walker, Film Forum 212-627-2035 • [email protected] SYNOPSIS As the Allies march toward Paris in the summer of 1944, Hitler gives or- ders that the French capital should not fall into enemy hands, or if it does, then ‘only as a field of rubble’. The person assigned to carry out this bar- baric act is Wehrmacht commander of Greater Paris, General Dietrich von Choltitz, who already has mines planted on the Eiffel Tower, in the Louvre and Notre-Dame and on the bridges over the Seine. Nothing should be left as a reminder of the city’s former glory. However, at dawn on 25 August, Swedish Consul General Raoul Nordling steals into German headquarters through a secret underground tunnel and there starts a tension-filled game of cat and mouse as Nordling tries to persuade Choltitz to abandon his plan. In this passionate and emotional adaptation of the 2011 stage success by Cyril Gély, the great Volker Schlöndorff (Academy Award winner THE TIN DRUM) has created a psychologically elaborate game of political manners between two highly contrasting characters. While Choltitz entrenches him- self behind his duty to obey unquestioningly all military orders, Nordling tries everything he can to appeal to reason and humanity and prevent the senseless destruction of the beloved 'City of Lights'. Q&A WITH VOLKER SCHLONDORFF What drew you to the project? War places men in extreme situations and brings out the best and worst in humanity.
    [Show full text]