Authority and Obedience in Bernhard Schlink's Der Vorleser and Die
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Authority and Obedience in Bernhard Schlink’s Der Vorleser and Die Heimkehr by Margit Assmann Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts University of Tasmania September 2010 i Statements This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma at the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Signed: Margit Assmann Date: 21 September 2010 ii Abstract In presenting the crimes of SS-guards through the medium of an illiterate woman, Schlink’s novel Der Vorleser (1995) attracted a mainly stern critical response. The much-criticised one-sided portrayal of destructive obedience seems to be addressed by his next novel Die Heimkehr (2006), where submission to malevolent authority is transferred to an intellectual platform set in America in the years following World War II. Although Schlink maintains he did not intend Die Heimkehr as a sequel to Der Vorleser, there are several thematic aspects linking the two novels. Both have a male German narrator, who was born around the end of World War II and has close links with a former Nazi collaborator. At the centre of both novels is Schlink’s portrayal of the nature of obedience to authority, uncovering the reality of man’s divided nature that consists in both good and evil. Destructive obedience is portrayed in both novels rather one-sidedly, either as a problem of a lack of education, or as a discussion on an intellectual level. It therefore seems justified to read Der Vorleser and Die Heimkehr in chronological order to arrive at a more realistic picture of obedience to authority. In Die Heimkehr, Schlink’s authority figure is an American University professor who uses Stanley Milgram’s (1960’s) study series of obedience to authority for his own questionable purposes. Schlink therefore provides within the plot itself a theoretical approach to analyse this novel. The examination of Schlink’s portrayal of authority and obedience reveals that Der Vorleser and Die Heimkehr when read as independent works, do not address the universal dilemma of submission iii to malevolent authority. However, an analysis of Schlink’s earlier novel Der Vorleser, based on Milgram’s theories, uncovers surprising parallels with Die Heimkehr even though, as Schlink has stated, the novels are not connected. This dissertation draws upon Milgram’s study to uncover and examine the relationship between authority and obedience in Schlink’s novels to show how atrocities come about. The study provides a paradigm for analysing the protagonists of Der Vorleser and Die Heimkehr based on Milgram’s obedience study, which, as yet, has not been consulted for an analysis of Schlink’s novels. Read in sequence however, using Milgram’s theories, Der Vorleser and Die Heimkehr can be shown to complement each other and confirm that Schlink views obedience to destructive authority as a permanent and universal problem. iv Acknowledgements I would like to express my gratitude to Dr. Eva Meidl and Dr. Billy Badger for their valuable advice, which helped me to complete this project. I thank Professor Bernhard Schlink who kindly responded to the questions I had about his two novels that I examined in this work. I have also very much appreciated the stimulation of seminars provided by the School of English, Journalism and European Languages. Finally, I thank my father for his encouragement and support. v Table of Contents Introduction.................................................................................................... 1 1. Authority and Obedience – Stanley Milgram ................................ 11 1.1. Authority – Milgram, Weber and Potts............................................... 14 1.1.1. Rational Authority ........................................................................ 19 1.1.2. Charisma/Charismatic Authority .................................................. 20 1.1.1.1. Authority and Trust .......................................................... 23 1.1.1.2. Authority and Deception................................................... 26 1.1.1.3. Authority and Manipulation.............................................. 28 1.1.1.4. Authority and Responsibility............................................. 29 1.2. Obedience ............................................................................................. 31 1.2.1. Forces underlying Obedience to Authority.................................... 33 1.2.2. The Universality of Obedience to Authority................................... 39 2. Authority and Obedience in Schlink’s Der Vorleser .................... 43 2.1. Authority in Der Vorleser ..................................................................... 44 2.1.1. Rational Authority ........................................................................ 45 2.1.2. Charisma/charismatic Authority ................................................... 47 2.1.1.1. Authority and Trust .......................................................... 51 2.1.1.2. Authority and Deception.................................................. 54 2.1.1.3. Authority and Manipulation............................................. 56 2.1.1.4. Authority and Responsibility ............................................ 59 2.2. Obedience in Der Vorleser .................................................................... 61 2.2.1. Forces underlying Obedience to Authority.................................... 62 2.2.2. The Universality of Obedience to Authority................................... 70 3. Authority and Obedience in Schlink’s Die Heimkehr.................. 74 3.1. Authority in Die Heimkehr................................................................... 75 3.1.1. Rational Authority ........................................................................ 76 3.1.2. Charisma/Charismatic Authority .................................................. 82 3.1.1.1. Authority and Trust .......................................................... 85 3.1.1.2. Authority and Deception.................................................. 87 3.1.1.3. Authority and Manipulation............................................. 89 3.1.1.4. Authority and Responsibility............................................. 94 3.2. Obedience in Die Heimkehr.................................................................. 98 3.2.1. Forces underlying Obedience to Authority.................................... 99 3.2.2. The Universality of Obedience to Authority................................. 106 Conclusion................................................................................................... 108 Bibliography............................................................................................... 113 1 Authority and Obedience in Bernhard Schlink’s Der Vorleser and Die Heimkehr Introduction Bernhard Schlink, a German professor of law, is known for such literary accomplishments like Vergangenheitsschuld: Beiträge zu einem deutschen Thema (2007), Selbs Justiz (2006), Die Heimkehr (2006), Selbs Mord (2001), Liebesfluchten (2000), Selbs Betrug (1994), and Die Gordische Schleife (1988), but it was his novel Der Vorleser that brought him international recognition in 1995. With its movie adaptation called The Reader by David Hare in 2008, Schlink’s Der Vorleser received renewed attention. The following discussion will concentrate on Der Vorleser and Die Heimkehr, as they share several thematic aspects. For example, the novels have a male German narrator born roughly around the end of World War II with close links to a Nazi collaborator. At the heart of these novels, is Schlink’s discussion about the nature of obedience to authority. In light of these shared aspects, it can be mooted that Schlink intended to address the much debated and criticised portrayal of authority and obedience in Der Vorleser and in his novel Die Heimkehr. For example, in Der Vorleser, Schlink’s primary focus is on the destructive obedience of a former female SS guard who comes from a lower working class background and is illiterate. In Die Heimkehr, he transfers the theme of destructive obedience to an intellectual platform in America long after World War II. If these aspects are meant to connect both novels, then the one-sided picture of obedience to authority in Der Vorleser is 2 complemented in Die Heimkehr. However, personal correspondence with the author1 reveals that Schlink did not intend Die Heimkehr as a sequel to Der Vorleser. He did not see the need to show that everyone is capable of obeying a “malevolent authority,” since “Intellektuelle nicht moralischer sind als Nicht-Intellektuelle - das zeigt das Dritte Reich so häufig und so deutlich, daß es nicht eigens in einem Roman gezeigt werden muß.”2 Yet, this is a theme Schlink explores in his novel Die Heimkehr. Since Schlink’s main focus on obedience to “malevolent authority” in both novels does concentrate on either a German illiterate or on mainly American intellectuals, I believe a sequential treatment of Der Vorleser and Die Heimkehr is justified in order to arrive at a more comprehensive picture about this human response to an order. To substantiate