DOCSLIB.ORG

In the Supreme Court of the United States

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In the Supreme Court of the United States No. 02-722 In the Supreme Court of the United States AMERICAN INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN RE-INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL., Petitioners, v. JOHN GARAMENDI, IN HIS CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit JOINT APPENDIX KENNETH S. GELLER FRANK KAPLAN Counsel of Record Counsel of Record JOHN J. SULLIVAN Alschuler Grossman Stein Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Kahan LLP & Maw 1620 26th Street 1909 K Street, NW Fourth Floor Washington, DC 20006 Santa Monica, CA 90404 (202) 263-3000 (310) 907-1000 Counsel for Petitioners Counsel for Respondent PETITION FOR CERTIORARI FILED NOVEMBER 7, 2002 CERTIORARI GRANTED JANUARY 10, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Appendix Page A. Relevant Docket Entries: United States District Court for the Eastern District of California .............. 1 B. Relevant Docket Entries: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit................... 13 C. Order Granting Certiorari (January 10, 2003) ...... 23 D. Declaration of Rabbi Abraham Cooper (April 24, 2000) ...................................... 24 E. Declaration of Arthur P. Stern (April 25, 2000) .... 29 F. Declaration of Leslie Tick (May 3, 2000) ......... 32 G. Statement by Deputy Treasury Secretary Stuart E. Eizenstat (June 12, 2000) ...................... 50 H. Letter from National Security Adviser Samuel R. Berger and Counsel to the President Beth Nolan to National Security Assistant Michael Steiner (June 16, 2000) ...................................... 52 I. Letter from National Security Assistant Michael Steiner to National Security Adviser Samuel [R]. Berger (July 5, 2000) ......................... 55 J. Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Stuart E Eizenstat, Remarks at the 12th and Concluding Plenary on the German Foundation, Berlin, Germany (July 17, 2000) ..................................... 57 K. Harry Schweid, Armitage Speaks on Holocaust Claims (AP July 18, 2001) ..................... 69 (I) ii TABLE OF CONTENTS — Continued Appendix Page L. Supplemental Declaration of Frank Kaplan (August 13, 2001) ................................... 71 NOTICE The following items have been omitted in printing this Joint Appendix because they appear on the following pages in the printed Appendix to the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari: A. Opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, filed July 15, 2002 (amended September 9, 2002) ........................... 1a B. Opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, filed February 7, 2001 ............ 34a C. Opinion of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, filed October 2, 2001 61a D. Opinion of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, filed June 9, 2000 . 85a F. Letter from Deputy Treasury Secretary Stuart E. Eizenstat to the Honorable Gray Davis (November 30, 1999) .................................... 123a G. Deputy Treasury Secretary Stuart E. Eizenstat, Special Representative of the Secretary of State and the President on Holocaust-Related Issues, Senate Foreign Relations Committee (April 5, 2000) .... 126a H. The Executive Agreement on the German Foundation (July 17, 2000) ............................ 153a iii TABLE OF CONTENTS — Continued Appendix Page I. Joint Statement by President George W. Bush and Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder on a Transatlantic Vision for the 21st Century (March 29, 2001) .... 169a J. Statement by Ambassador Randolph M. Bell, Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC, to the U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Government Reform, Subcommittee on Governmental Efficiency, Financial Management and Intergovernmental Relations (September 24, 2002) ....................... 174a The following items have been omitted in printing this Joint Appendix because they appear on the following pages in the printed Appendix to the Respondent’s Brief in Opposition: D. Testimony of Leslie Tick, California Department of Insurance, United States House of Representatives Government Reform[’s] Subcommittee on Governmental Efficiency, Financial Management and International Relations (September 24, 2002) ...... 23 E. Statement of Representative Henry A. Waxman, Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Government Reform, at the Subcommittee on Governmental Efficiency, Financial Management and International Relations Hearing on H.R. 2963 (September 24, 2002) ......................... 31 F. Prepared Statement of David S. Waldman, Vice President-Chief Operations Counsel, MONY Life Insurance Company, for the House Committee on the Government Reform’s Sub-committee on Government Efficiency, Financial Management and iv TABLE OF CONTENTS — Continued Appendix Page Inter-Government Relations Hearing on H.R. 2963 (September 24, 2002) ......................... 35 G. Order of U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denying petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc filed on March 29, 2001, in Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of American, et al. v. Low, No. 00-16163, et al. (Gerling I) ................. 42 H. Cover page and pages 6-9 of Brief for Amicus Curiae the United States of America served on or about September 20, 2000, in Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of American, et al. v. Low, No. 00-16163, et al. (Gerling I).................................. 44 I. Cover page and page 11 of Brief for Amicus Curiae the United States of America served on or about March 9, 2001, in Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of American, et al. v. Low, No. 00-16163, et al. (Gerling I) ............................... 50 J. An unofficial translation of the Bundestag resolution, adopted on May 30, 2001, dealing with the German Foundation; obtained from the United States Department of State .......................... 53 K. Cover page and page 6 of Motion of the Federal Republic of Germany for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae and Brief Amicus Curiae supporting affirmance of summary judgment for plaintiffs- appellees/cross-appellants, served on or about March 15, 2001, in Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of American, et al. v. Low, No. 01-17023, et al. (Gerling II) ........................................ 55 v TABLE OF CONTENTS — Continued Appendix Page L. Investigative Subpoena for Records issued In the Matter of Holocaust Victims Insurance Enforcement Proceeding Case No. 31393-99-SC .............. 58 N. Cover page and excerpt from pages 41-42 of Memorandum of Law in Support of Azzicurazioni Generali S.p.A.’s Motion to Dismiss, Strike, and/or for Judgment on All Plaintiffs’ Claims, on Choice of Law and Related Grounds, dated November 15, 2002, in In re: Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A. Holocaust Insurance Litigation (S.D.N.Y. 2002) (No. MDL 1374 M 21-89 (MBM)) ....................... 71 1 APPENDIX A UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Nos. 00-CV-506, 00-CV-613, 00-CV-779, 00-CV-875 GERLING GLOBAL REINSURANCE CORP. OF AMERICA, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. CHUCK QUACKENBUSH, IN HIS CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant. RELEVANT DOCKET ENTRIES* DATE # DOCKET ENTRY [entries from the Docket in 00-CV-506 (Gerling)] 3/9/00 1 COMPLAINT by the Gerling plaintiffs. 3/9/00 7 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for preliminary injunction by plaintiffs. 3/9/00 8 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES by plaintiffs in support of motion for preliminary injunction. * For the Court’s convenience, the docket entries have been revised and reworded to reflect more clearly the actual entries in the district court’s docket. Separate dockets were maintained for the four cases filed by petitioners and Gerling until October 16, 2000, when the district court ordered the cases consolidated. 2 3/27/00 20 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to dismiss by defendant. 3/27/00 21 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES by defendant in support of motion to dismiss. 3/27/00 22 DECLARATION of Frank Kaplan in support of motion to dismiss. 4/10/00 29 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION by plaintiffs to motion to dismiss by defendant. 4/10/00 30 NOTICE OF COUNTER-MOTION AND COUNTER-MOTION for summary judgment by plaintiffs. 4/10/00 32 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES by plaintiffs in support of counter-motion for summary judgment. 5/8/00 55 RESPONSE by defendant to motion for summary judgment by plaintiffs, and to motion for preliminary injunction by plaintiffs. 5/8/00 57 OBJECTIONS by defendant to evidence submitted by plaintiffs in support of motions for summary judgment and preliminary injunction. 5/8/00 60 DECLARATIONS in opposition to motion for preliminary injunction and motion for summary judgment. 5/15/00 73 BRIEF of the Federal Republic of Germany as amicus curiae. 5/17/00 77 OPPOSITION by defendant to motion for summary judgment by plaintiffs, and to 3 motion for preliminary injunction by plaintiffs. 5/22/00 78 REPLY BRIEF by defendant in support of motion to dismiss complaint. 5/22/00 80 REPLY by plaintiffs in support of counter-motion for summary judgment. 5/22/00 85 RESPONSE by defendant to brief of Federal Republic of Germany as amicus curiae. 6/2/00 92 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to file amicus brief by the People of the State of California. 6/6/00 94 MINUTES of hearing * * *: motion to file amicus brief by the People of the State of California SUBMITTED, motion to dismiss by defendant SUBMITTED, motion for preliminary injunction by plaintiffs SUBMITTED, motion for summary judgment by plaintiffs SUBMITTED; order to be prepared by the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lloyd Cutler
    White House Interview Program DATE: July 8, 1999 INTERVIEWEE: LLOYD CUTLER INTERVIEWER: Martha Kumar With Nancy Kassop MK: May we tape? LC: Yes, but I’d like to have one understanding. I have been misquoted on more than one occasion. I’ll be happy to talk to you about what I think about the transition but I don’t want my name attached to any of it. MK: Okay. So we’ll come back to you for any quotes. We’re going to look at both aspects: the transition itself and then the operations of the office. Working on the theory that one of the things that would be important for people is to understand how an effective operation works, what should they be aiming toward? For example, what is a smooth-running counsel’s office? What are the kinds of relationships that should be established and that sort of thing? So, in addition to looking at the transition, we’re just hoping they’re looking toward effective governance. In your time in Washington, observing many administrations from various distances, you have a good sense of transitions, what works and what doesn’t work. One of the things we want to do is isolate what are the elements of success—just take a number, six elements, five elements—that you think are common to successful transitions. What makes them work? LC: Well, the most important thing to grasp first is how much a White House itself, especially as it starts off after a change in the party occupying the White House, resembles a city hall.
    [Show full text]
  • White House Transition Interview
    White House Interview Program DATE: December 29, 1999 INTERVIEWEE: GERALD RAFSHOON INTERVIEWER: Martha Kumar [Disc 1 of 1] MK: When you’d like to go off-the-record or on-background, that’s fine as well. Ultimately the material goes into a presidential library; it will go into the [Jimmy] Carter Library. We’re working with the National Archives on it. The full interviews don’t come out publicly until 2001, when a new President comes in, and also you’ve had a chance to go over the transcript. GR: Okay. MK: It’s going to be used in various ways. It’s a group of presidency scholars and we’re doing profiles of seven offices. We’ve selected seven offices. And we’ll go back over time to the [Richard] Nixon administration, and profile what the functions have been, the responsibilities, different ways in which they’ve been organized. I’m writing the one by myself on communications. I’m doing press and communications by myself. The pieces themselves are going to be short, although they’ll be on a pass-coded website for people coming in so they can then⎯in addition to reading the fifteen pages about some of the general things about the office⎯they’ll be able to select items within it as well. We’ll have links in to longer pieces. And then we’re doing what we call “Standards of a Successful Start” in the spring, which are isolating maybe eight elements that are common to successful transitions. GR: Interesting. Did you read Bob Woodward's latest book, Shadow: Five Presidents and the Legacy of Watergate? MK: Yes.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening Argument - Lloyd Cutler: the Last Superlawyer - Nationaljourn
    Opening Argument - Lloyd Cutler: The Last Superlawyer - NationalJourn... http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/opening-argument-lloyd-cutler... BY STUART TAYLOR JR May 14, 2005 . There will never be another superlawyer on the scale of Lloyd Cutler, who died on May 8 at age 87. This is not to deny the possibility that someone, somewhere may replicate the dazzling array of talents that made Cutler the pre-eminent lawyer-statesman of his generation: intellectual brilliance, wisdom, public-spiritedness, eloquence, genius for grasping the interests of everyone around the table, and passion for forging consensus solutions to hard problems. But even if more such people walk among us, the political and legal environments that enabled Cutler to be Cutler no longer exist. This is a man who served every Democratic president since LBJ and every Republican president since Ronald Reagan; who won the trust and friendship of the best and brightest leaders in both major parties; who represented corporate titans and civil-rights groups; who moved effortlessly between private and public sectors; who tackled national problems as diverse as the race riots of the 1960s, the Iranian hostage crisis, the vast, unsecured nuclear stockpiles in Russia, and faulty intelligence on weapons in Iraq. The snarling partisanship, pervasive mistrust, intellectual shallowness, and TV-driven demagogy that permeate today's Washington would make it all but impossible for a Lloyd Cutler to work his magic now. He was in his element when steering small groups of serious, moderate-spirited leaders who wanted to make the system work, and who were moved not by flash or fiery rhetoric or poll numbers, but by intellectual rigor.
    [Show full text]
  • Senator SIMON. Mr. Chairman, If I Could Just Say I Am Going to the Same Press Conference on Health Care
    468 Senator SIMON. Mr. Chairman, if I could just say I am going to the same press conference on health care. The CHAIRMAN. One thing Mr. Nader understands is press con- ferences, and I am sure he will understand your need to be there. Senator METZENBAUM. Also, he understands health care. The CHAIRMAN. He understands health care, as well. As a matter of fact, I am surprised he is not going to the press conference with you. Senator COHEN. Mr. Chairman, I am told there is going to be a vote at 1:45 p.m. The CHAIRMAN. I am glad to be informed of all these things. Why don't we just begin and we will see where the schedule takes us. Mr. Nader, welcome. PANEL CONSISTING OF RALPH NADER, WASHINGTON, DC; SID- NEY M. WOLFE, CITIZEN'S GROUP, WASHINGTON, DC; LLOYD CONSTANTINE, CONSTANTINE & ASSOCIATES, NEW YORK, NY; AND RALPH ZESTES, KOGOD COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AD- MINISTRATION, AMERICAN UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON, DC STATEMENT OF RALPH NADER Mr. NADER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members of the com- mittee. I would like to submit my 20-page testimony and note that there are five important attachments: First, one by Professor Carstensen, of the University of Wisconsin Law School, dealing with the case of price squeeze that was so widely discussed earlier in these hear- ings, a case by Judge Breyer; second, a thorough critique by a friend of Judge Breyer, but he is a critic, Professor Tom McGarity, of the University of Texas Law School, on Judge Breyer's health and environmental safety positions; third, a critique of Judge Breyer's chapter on the National Highway Traffic Safety Adminis- tration, by Clarence Ditlow and Joan Claybrook, which illustrates that some of Judge Breyer's research is quite shoddy; fourth, a list of very stimulating questions by Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Counsel to the President: a Guide to Its Records at the Jimmy Carter Library
    441 Freedom Parkway NE Atlanta, GA 30307 http://www.jimmycarterlibrary.gov Records of the White House Office of Counsel to the President: A Guide to Its Records at the Jimmy Carter Library Collection Summary Creator: Office of Counsel to the President Title: Records of the White House Office of Counsel to the President Dates: 1977-1981 Quantity: 400 linear feet (118 linear feet, 7 linear inches open for research), 462 containers Identification: Accession Number: 80-1 National Archives Identifier: 1083 Scope and Content: The files consist of correspondence, memoranda, notes, briefing papers, legal documents, and miscellaneous printed material. These materials relate to information regarding all official White House legal issues including domestic matters and foreign policy treaties. The files also consist of legal advice given to the president on personal and political situations. Creator Information: Office of Counsel to the President The purpose of the White House Office of Counsel to the President was to provide legal advice to the President and the White House staff. It also acted as liaison to the Department of Justice and to the legal counsels of various government agencies. It dealt with ethical matters, conflicts of interest, and security clearances concerning Presidential appointees and White House staff. It provided legal advice on the President's official and personal legal affairs, legislation, and Supreme Court cases. It also was involved in the coordination of appointments to the1 federal judiciary. The Counsel's Office staff is comprised of lawyers plus clerical and administrative personnel. Detailees, consultants, and interns increased the size of the office to varying levels throughout the administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional "Refolution" in the Ex-Communist World: the Rule of Law
    American University International Law Review Volume 12 | Issue 1 Article 2 1997 Constitutional "Refolution" in the Ex-Communist World: The Rule of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/auilr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation American University International Law Review. "Constitutional "Refolution" in the Ex-Communist World: The Rule of Law." American University International Law Review 12, no. 1 (1997): 45-143. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SYMPOSIUM CONSTITUTIONAL "REFOLUTION" IN THE EX-COMMUNIST WORLD: THE RULE OF LAW September 26, 1996 FOREWORD* Since the collapse of communist power in the early 1990s, Eastern Europe and the rest of the former Soviet-dominated world have experienced significant and unprecedented changes. Although potentially revolutionary in impact, the eco- nomic, political, and legal transitions have been achieved through reform of exist- ing institutions rather than violent revolution. Timothy Garton Ash has called this process "refolution." This symposium will focus on the development and promo- tion of the rule of law in the context of this "refolution" now underway in the for- mer communist world. The panelists, each an experienced and renowned special- ist, will present their views in a roundtable format that will include extensive audience questions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lloyd N. Cutler Lecture Rule Of
    THE LL OYD N. CU tl ER LE ct URE on the RU L E OF LAW The Rule of Law: Indispensable Pre-Requisite 1828 L Street, NW Schloss Leopoldskron for Democracy Eleventh Floor P.O. Box 129 Washington, DC 20036 USA 5010 Salzburg, Austria Justice Richard J. Goldstone +1 (202) 467-8864 +43 (662) 839830 November 9, 2009 www.SalzburgGlobal.org The Phillips Collection Washington, D.C. RICHA R D J. GOLDSTONE PR O gr AM ichard J. Goldstone is an international jurist and legal scholar who Welcome B. Thomas Mansbach has a distinguished record of service both to his native country of Chair, Advisory Board RSouth Africa and the larger global community. His legal studies were completed at the University of the Witwatersrand in 1962, and over three Lloyd N. Cutler Center for the Rule of Law decades he served as Judge of the Transvaal Supreme Court, judge of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court and, for nearly a decade, Remarks Justice Sandra Day O’Connor Justice of the Constitutional Court of South Africa. From 1991 to 1994, he led the South African Commission of Inquiry Regarding Public Violence Member, Advisory Board and Intimidation. Lloyd N. Cutler Center for the Rule of Law In 1994, he was appointed Chief Prosecutor of the United Nations International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. Introduction Stephen L. Salyer He later led the International Independent Inquiry on Kosovo. More President and Chief Executive Officer recently, he was appointed by the Secretary-General of the United Salzburg Global Seminar Nations to the Independent International Committee that investigated the Iraq Oil for Food Program and, earlier this year, he led the UN Fact Finding Mission on Gaza established by the President of the UN Cutler Lecture The Rule of Law: Indispensable Pre-Requisite Human Rights Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Full PDF
    Chapter Title Preparing to Be President The Memos of Richard E. Neustadt Edited by Charles O. Jones The AEI Press Publisher for the American Enterprise Institute W A S H I N G T O N , D . C . 2000 Book Title 2 Chapter Title Contents Foreword vv Norman J. Ornstein and Thomas E. Mann Part 1 The Editor’s Introduction The Truman Aide Turned Professor 33 Part 2 Neustadt Memos for the Kennedy Transition Memo 1. Organizing the Transition 21 Memo 2. Staffing the President-Elect 38 Attachment A: Roosevelt’s Approach to Staffing the White House 54 Attachment B: Roosevelt’s Approach to Staffing the Budget Bureau 61 Memo 3. Cabinet Departments: Some Things to Keep in Mind 63 Memo 4. White House Titles 70 Memo 5. A White House Aide for Personnel and Congressional Liaison 72 Memo 6. The National Security Council: First Steps 75 Memo 7. Shutting Down Eisenhower’s “Cabinet System” 82 Memo 8. Appointing Fred Dutton “Staff Secretary” Instead of “Cabinet Secretary” 83 Memo 9. Location of Disarmament Agency 86 Memo 10. The Science Adviser: First Steps 94 iii iv CONTENTS Memo 11. Coping with “Flaps” in the Early Days of the New Administration 997 Memo 12. Possible Remarks by the President at the Outset of the Cabinet Meeting (prepared with Fred Dutton) 101 Part 3 Neustadt Memos from Reagan to Clinton Memo 13. Historical Problems in Staffing the White House (for James Baker III) 107 Memo 14. Transition Planning during the Campaign (for Michael Dukakis law partner Paul Brountas) 120 Memo 15. “Lessons” for the Eleven Weeks (for Bill Clinton friend Robert B.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Investigations: Subpoenas and Contempt Power
    Order Code RL31836 Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Congressional Investigations: Subpoenas and Contempt Power April 2, 2003 Louis Fisher Senior Specialist in Separation of Powers Government and Finance Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Congressional Investigations: Subpoenas and Contempt Power Summary When conducting investigations of the executive branch, congressional committees and Members of Congress generally receive the information required for legislative needs. If agencies fail to cooperate or the President invokes executive privilege, Congress can turn to a number of legislative powers that are likely to compel compliance. The two techniques described in this report are the issuance of subpoenas and the holding of executive officials in contempt. These techniques usually lead to an accommodation that meets the needs of both branches. Litigation is used at times, but federal judges generally encourage congressional and executive parties to settle their differences out of court. The specific examples in this report explain how information disputes arise and how they are resolved. For legal analysis see CRS Report 95-464A, Investigative Oversight: An Introduction to the Law, Practice, and Procedure of Congressional Inquiry, by Morton Rosenberg, and CRS Report RS30319, Presidential Claims of Executive Privilege: History, Law, Practice and Recent Developments, by Morton Rosenberg. A number of legislative tools, including subpoenas and contempt citations, are covered in CRS Report RL30966,
    [Show full text]
  • The Lloyd N. Cutler Lecture on the Rule of Law the Phillips Collection Washington, D.C
    The Lloyd N. Cutler Lecture on the Rule of Law The Phillips Collection Washington, D.C. November 9, 2009 Note--This is a transcript of the program that is based on manuscripts submitted by the speakers and by transcription from audio files. Errors may have occurred in the process of creating this printed document. B. Thomas Mansbach Chair, Advisory Board Lloyd N. Cutler Center for the Rule of Law Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Tom Mansbach and I’m here tonight wearing two hats. First and by far the most important, I have the honor to serve as the Chairman of the Advisory Board of the Cutler Center for Rule of Law at the Salzburg Global Seminar. In this capacity, it is my pleasure to welcome you to the Inaugural Lloyd N. Cutler Lecture on the Rule of Law. In the few short months since we began this effort, we’ve been most fortunate to have been able to assemble a very distinguished Advisory Board, whose members are listed in your program and many of whom are with us this evening I’m glad to say. It is a true testimonial to the esteem in which Lloyd Cutler is held today still and a monument to his memory in the City of Washington. His impact on American history will not be ephemeral. Wearing my second hat, as a Trustee of the Phillips Collection, it is a distinct pleasure to welcome you to our Museum and our beautiful new auditorium. Following tonight’s program, as you wend your way to the reception in the Music Room in the Mansion, I hope that you will linger – but just for a moment – in the galleries with the old friends that populate their walls.
    [Show full text]
  • Mifitary I Law Xeview
    I rr ,I Mifitary I Law xeview AMERICAN MILITARY LAW IN THE LIGHT OF THE FIRST MUTINY ACT'S TRICENTENNIAL Colonel Frederick Bernays Wiener, AUS (Retired) THE SIXTH ANNUAL WALDEMAR A. SOLF LECTURE IN INTERNATIONAL LAW. TERRORISM, THE LAW, AND THE NATIONAL DEFENSE Abraham D. Sofaer THE CULTURE OF CHANGE IN MILITARY LAW Eugene R. Fidel1 ANDREW JACKSON, MARTIAL LAW, CMLIAN CONTROL OF THE MILITARY, AND AMERICAN POLITICS: AN INTRIGUING AMALGAM Jonathan Lurie INSTRUCI'IONS AND ADVOCACY Major Michael D. Warren and Lieutenant Colonel W. Gary Jewel1 Volume 126 Fall 1989 Pamphlet HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NO. 27-100-126 Washington, D.C., Fall 1989 MILITARY LAW REVIEW-VOL. 126 The Military Law Review has been published quarterly at The Judge Advocate General’s School, US. Army, Charlottesville, Vir- ginia, since 1958. The Review provides a forum for those interested in military law to share the products of their experience and research and is designed for use by military attorneys in connection with their official duties. Writings offered for publication should be of direct concern and import in this area of scholarship, and preference will be given to those writings having lasting value as reference material for the military lawyer. The Review encourages frank discussion of relevant legislative, administrative, and judicial developments. EDITORIAL STAFF MAJOR ALAN D. CHUTE,Editor MS. EVA F. SKINNER, Editorial Assistant SUBSCRIFWONS: Private subscriptions may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. Publication exchange subscriptions are available to law schools and other organizations that publish legal periodicals.
    [Show full text]
  • Lloyd N. Cutler Lecture on Rule of Law November 20, 2016 the Supreme Court
    Lloyd N. Cutler Lecture on Rule of Law November 20, 2016 The Supreme Court Law and the Use of Force: Challenges for the Next President John B. Bellinger III I. Introduction Justice Kennedy, ladies and gentlemen, it’s a great privilege for me to be asked to give this lecture. I want to thank Stephen Salyer, Heather Haaga, and the board of the Salzburg Global Seminar for inviting me. I want to thank all of you for coming this evening. I am especially honored that Lloyd Cutler’s daughter, Beverly, is here tonight. I was very fortunate to be able to work closely with Lloyd when I was an associate at Wilmer Cutler & Pickering in the early 1990s. I had recently left the CIA where I had the privilege to serve as a young special assistant to CIA Director William Webster. Lloyd recruited me to work on some of his more interesting government-related projects. Among other assignments, I helped Lloyd advise three former Republican Secretaries of LloydCutlerLecture(final).docx State -- Henry Kissinger, George Shultz, and James Baker -- each of whom had become the subject of a congressional or Independent Counsel investigation. My fellow associates were somewhat envious of this interesting work but questioned whether there was any future to a Republican Secretary of State practice. I am glad I was able to prove them wrong. In 1994, while I was working with Lloyd, President Clinton recruited him to serve again as White House Counsel. Lloyd said at the time: “In government, as in other aspects of life, trust is the coin of the realm, and I pledge myself to do what I can to assure that trust is maintained.” That is an important credo for all of us today.
    [Show full text]