“Thick As Autumnal Leaves”—
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Studies in African Linguistics Volume 46, Numbers 1&2, 2017 Melanie
Studies in African Linguistics Volume 46, Numbers 1&2, 2017 CONDITIONAL CONSTRUCTIONS IN BUWAL Melanie Viljoen SIL Cameroon Buwal is a Central Chadic language spoken in the Far North Region of Cameroon. This study examines the structure of conditional constructions in Buwal and their functions. Conditionals in Buwal can be divided into four major categories according to how they are marked: possible, counterfactual, necessary and concessive. Possible conditionals include both reality and unreality conditionals. The usual order is for the protasis to precede the apodosis, but the reverse order is also possible. All types of tense/aspect marking are possible in both the protasis and the apodosis with variations arising from semantic rather than grammatical restrictions. The possible conditional marker can also function as a temporal marker in certain contexts. In a conditional construction, the protasis provides a framework or background for the apodosis. Keywords: conditional, Buwal, Chadic 0. Introduction Buwal is a Central Chadic language spoken by approximately 10 000 people in and around the village of Gadala in the Far North Region of Cameroon, Mayo-Tsanaga Division, Mokolo Subdivision. Buwal’s classification according to the Ethnologue (Lewis, Simons & Fennig 2014) is Afroasiatic, Chadic, Biu-Mandara, A, A7. The majority of linguistic research done on this language has been conducted by the author, who completed a description of the grammar to fulfil the requirements of a Ph.D. in 2013. This study, although partially based on this description, goes into greater depth than the description in examining both the structure of Buwal conditionals and their functions. 1. Structure of Buwal Conditional Constructions Conditional constructions in Buwal can be divided into four major categories according to how they are marked; possible (1.1), counterfactual (1.2), necessary (1.3) and concessive (1.4). -
Conditionals in Political Texts
JOSIP JURAJ STROSSMAYER UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES Adnan Bujak Conditionals in political texts A corpus-based study Doctoral dissertation Advisor: Dr. Mario Brdar Osijek, 2014 CONTENTS Abstract ...........................................................................................................................3 List of tables ....................................................................................................................4 List of figures ..................................................................................................................5 List of charts....................................................................................................................6 Abbreviations, Symbols and Font Styles ..........................................................................7 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................9 1.1. The subject matter .........................................................................................9 1.2. Dissertation structure .....................................................................................10 1.3. Rationale .......................................................................................................11 1.4. Research questions ........................................................................................12 2. Theoretical framework .................................................................................................13 -
The Semiotics of Axiological Convergences and Divergences1 Ľubomír Plesník
DOI: 10.2478/aa-2020-0004 West – East: The semiotics of axiological convergences and divergences1 Ľubomír Plesník Professor Ľubomír Plesník works as a researcher and teacher at the Institute of Literary and Artistic Communication (from 1993 to 2003 he was the director of the Institute, and at present he is the head of the Department of Semiotic Studies within the Institute). His research deals primarily with problems of literary theory, methodology and semiotics of culture. Based on the work of František Miko, he has developed concepts relating to pragmatist aesthetics, reception poetics and existential semiotics with a special focus on comparison of Western and oriental epistemes (Pragmatická estetika textu 1995, Estetika inakosti 1998, Estetika jednakosti 2001, Tezaurus estetických výrazových kvalít 2011). Abstract: This study focuses on the verbal representation of life strategies in Vetalapanchavimshati, an old Indian collection of stories, which is part of Somadeva’s Kathasaritsagara. On the basis of the aspect of gain ~ loss, two basic life strategies are identified. The first one, the lower strategy, is defined by an attempt to obtain material gain, which is attained at the cost of a spiritual loss. The second one, the higher strategy, negates the first one (spiritual gain attained at the cost of a material loss) and it is an internally diversified series of axiological models. The core of the study explains the combinatorial variants which, in their highest positions, even transcend the gain ~ loss opposition. The final part of the study demonstrates the intersections between the higher strategy and selected European cultural initiatives (gnosis). 1. Problem definition, area of concern and material field Our goal is to reflect on the differences and intersections in the iconization of gains and losses in life between the Western and Eastern civilizations and cultural spheres. -
Virgil, Aeneid 11 (Pallas & Camilla) 1–224, 498–521, 532–96, 648–89, 725–835 G
Virgil, Aeneid 11 (Pallas & Camilla) 1–224, 498–521, 532–96, 648–89, 725–835 G Latin text, study aids with vocabulary, and commentary ILDENHARD INGO GILDENHARD AND JOHN HENDERSON A dead boy (Pallas) and the death of a girl (Camilla) loom over the opening and the closing part of the eleventh book of the Aeneid. Following the savage slaughter in Aeneid 10, the AND book opens in a mournful mood as the warring parti es revisit yesterday’s killing fi elds to att end to their dead. One casualty in parti cular commands att enti on: Aeneas’ protégé H Pallas, killed and despoiled by Turnus in the previous book. His death plunges his father ENDERSON Evander and his surrogate father Aeneas into heart-rending despair – and helps set up the foundati onal act of sacrifi cial brutality that caps the poem, when Aeneas seeks to avenge Pallas by slaying Turnus in wrathful fury. Turnus’ departure from the living is prefi gured by that of his ally Camilla, a maiden schooled in the marti al arts, who sets the mold for warrior princesses such as Xena and Wonder Woman. In the fi nal third of Aeneid 11, she wreaks havoc not just on the batt lefi eld but on gender stereotypes and the conventi ons of the epic genre, before she too succumbs to a premature death. In the porti ons of the book selected for discussion here, Virgil off ers some of his most emoti ve (and disturbing) meditati ons on the tragic nature of human existence – but also knows how to lighten the mood with a bit of drag. -
Dissertations, Department of Linguistics
UC Berkeley Dissertations, Department of Linguistics Title A Cognitive Approach to Mandarin Conditionals Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5qw934z5 Author Yang, Fan-Pei Publication Date 2007 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California A Cognitive Approach To Mandarin Conditionals By Fan-Pei Gloria Yang B.A. (National Taiwan Normal Univeristy) 1998 M.A. (University of California, Berkeley) 2003 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Eve Sweetser, Chair Professor George Lakoff Professor Jerome Feldman Spring 2007 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. A Cognitive Approach To Mandarin Conditionals Copyright © 2007 By Fan-Pei Gloria Yang Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Abstract A Cognitive Approach To Mandarin Conditionals By Fan-Pei Gloria Yang Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Berkeley Professor Eve Sweetser, Chair This dissertation provides a description of some of the common Mandarin conditional constructions, with a focus on describing the contributions of the linking devices to the conditional interpretations and their interactions with other elements in constructions. The analyses are based on corpus data and include studies on the pragmatic uses of conditionals. The discussion endeavors to show how cognitive structures link to linguistic structures and how spaces are built and frames evoked. Consequently, the research does not just provide a syntactic description, but offers an in-depth discussion of epistemic stance and grounding of information indicated by the linking devices. -
CLA 2323A Greek Mythology
Outline of the Iliad CLCV 2000A Classical Mythology Book 1 C. Hektor finds Andromache and Astyanax (369-502) I. The Quarrel (1-430) V. Paris and Hektor return to the fighting (503-529) II. Return of Chryseis to her home (430-492) Book 7 III. Balancing scene among the gods (493-611) I. Hektor and Paris return to battle (1-16) Book 2 II. Duel between Hektor and Aias (17-322) I. Agamemnon tests the army (1-154) III. Fighting halted to bury the dead (323-482) A. Odysseus recalls the troops (155-210) A. Greeks dig walls around ships (323-344) B. Thersites episode (211-332) B. Paris refuses to return Helen but offers other gifts (345-397) C. Nestor’s counsel (333-483) C. Greeks refuse Paris’ gifts (398-420) II. Catalogue of Greek Ships (484-785) D. Cremation of dead, Greeks build walls (421-482) III. Catalogue of Trojan troops (786-877) Book 8 Book 3 I. Assembly of gods; Zeus forbids gods to take part in battle (1-52) I. Truce by single combat between Paris and Menelaos (1-120) II. A day of fighting (53-349) II. The Teichoskopeia (Helen’s ‘View from the Wall’) (121-244) A. Battle begins with the scales of Zeus (53-65) III. The duel and the rescue (245-382) B. Nestor threatened by Hektor, rescued by Diomedes (78-166) IV. Helen and Paris (383-461) C. Advance of Trojans under Hektor (167-216) Book 4 D. Agamemnon rallies troops (217-334) I. Pandaros breaks the truce (1-122) E. -
The Birth of Gilgamesh
THE BIRTH OF GILGAMEÍ (Ael. NA XII.21) A case-study in literary receptivity* Wouter F.M. Henkelman (Leiden) Rapunzel, Rapunzel, Laß mir dein Haar herunter! 1. Greek and Near Eastern literature 1.1. Das zaubernde Wort – In a letter to Helene von Nostitz, Rainer Maria Rilke wrote about the Babylonian Gilgameß Epic, a translation of which he had just read in the Inselbücherei series. According to Rilke the epic contained “Maße und Gestalten die zum Größesten gehören, was das zaubernde Wort zu irgendeiner Zeit gegeben hat. (...) Hier ist das Epos der Todesfurcht, entstanden im Unvordenklichen unter Menschen, bei denen zuerst die Trennung von Tod und Leben definitiv und verhängnisvoll geworden war.”1 The literary quality of the Gilgameß epic is indeed striking – the celebrated friendship of Gilgameß and Enkidu and the sorrow of Gilgameß over the latter’s death are pictured in a compelling drama of such powerful imagery that it has even outlived its own bold image of eternity, the mighty walls of Uruk. Ever since its rediscovery, now some 130 years ago, the epic has stirred the minds of its many readers and – as is the hallmark of any true work of art – found just as many interpretations. It may come as no great surprise, then, that in the debate on Oriental ‘influences’ or (better) Near Eastern or ‘West-Asiatic’ elements in Greek literature the Gilgameß Epic has continuously held a central place. This is not the place to review the long and, at times, tediously unproductive debate between the modern philobarbaroi and the defenders of the romantic vision of a monolithic Hellas rising from the lowly dusts of time to a sublime state of ‘edle Einfalt’ all by itself and by itself alone. -
Lecture 14 Aeneid 12: War in Italy MDS1TRW the Roman World: Myth
MDS1TRW The Roman World: Myth and Empire Lecture 14 Aeneid 12: War in Italy hp://www.eBay.co.uk/itm/The-Aeneid-Rare-Card-LieBiG-Set-Part-II-Greece-Greek-Camille-Nisus-Gladiator/130940254241?_trksid=p2047675.m1850&_trkparms=aid%3D222002%26alGo%3DSIC.FIT%26ao %3D1%26asc%3D11%26meid%3D1158694072794277908%26pid%3D100011%26prG%3D1005%26rk%3D4%26rkt%3D5%26sd%3D380663535810%26 AENEID BOOKS 7-12 WAR IN LATIUM 7: Allecto ‘infects’ Turnus and Amata 8: Aeneas visits Evander at Pallanteum (’Rome’) 9: NiGht raid: Nisus and Euryalus (c.f. Iliad 10 Doloneia) 10: Turnus vs. Pallas, Aeneas vs. Mezenaus 11: MourninG for Pallas; truce; Camilla 12: Final duel AENEID BOOKS 7-12: THE ‘GREATER WORK’ New proem: 7.40 (p.141) – ‘Come now, Erato’ Use of first person sinGular ‘I shall tell’ REPLAYING THE TROJAN WAR Love trianGles: • Helen, Menelaus, Paris • Lavinia, Turnus, Aeneas • c.f. 7.96 (p.143) oracle: no marriage to a Lan Sibyl’s prophey (6.82f. = p.117) • ‘A second Achilles’ [Iliad and anGer of Achilles] • son of a Goddess – Venilia // Thes • N.B. father Daunus, Rutulian king (//Priam?) • sister Juturna (// Apollo – protector of Hector) • A. & T. as Achilles and Hector: But which is which? Book of fathers and sons 1. Turnus vs. Pallas 10.440-509 • aer Pallas’ aristeia • T: ‘Pallas is mine, and mine alone. I wish his father were here to see it.’ • Pallas also Bloodthirsty (10.459f.) • c.f. Evander’s paranG speech (8.560f. pp.166): ‘my only source of joy’ • P. killed in spear comBat • T. strips Body – Belt // Hector & Patroclus (Iliad 18) FUROR AND PIETAS IN BOOK 10 Aeneas: revenGe and furor • vicams (incl. -
Iliad Aristeia Chart – 3Rd Period 2018
Iliad Aristeia Chart – 3rd Period 2018 Aristeia: a soldier’s highest moment of glory in war, when he fights so bravely and single-mindedly as to experience no fear and to appear nearly invincible Instructions: Keep track of the aristeias in the epic as we read. Be sure to take note of line numbers so that you may refer back to the text with ease. Read carefully, but be aware that some of the character’s aristeias will be incomplete. Character: Character: Character: Character: Agamemnon Hector ________________________ ________________________ 1. Divine inspiration/ Page 296, 11. 11-14 Page 303 Iris (sent by Zeus) exhortation: Who/what inspires the hero’s “There Strife took her stand, Lines 233-242 aristeia? raising her high-pitched cry, “But soon as a spear or bowshot great and terrible . in each wound the king and Atrides Achaean’s heart – no stopping mount his chariot again – then them now” Zeus will hand you the power to (Strife = Eris/Goddes of kill and kill” Discord) 2. Armoring: What Page 297, 11. 18-50 “Hector leapt to the ground does the hero put on, from his chariot fully armed and in what order? Be 1. “wrapped his legs with well and brandishing two sharp detailed! made greaves” spears” (lines 245-246) 2. “strapped the breastplate round his chest” (ornate guest- gift for Ag. leaving for Troy) 3. “slung his sword” 4. “well-wrought shield” 5. “set his helmet” 6. “two tough spears” So fearsome looking “awestruck at the sight Athena and Hera loosed a crack of thunder” 3. Bursting into the Line 107 – “And right in the Bursting into ranks: “Hector – ranks of the enemy: midst sprang Agamemnon first whipping the fight and fire in How does the hero and killed a fighter” each man like a huntsman . -
Satan As the Hero of Paradise Lost
Satan as the hero of Paradise Lost Tvrtković, Mak Master's thesis / Diplomski rad 2019 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: University of Zagreb, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences / Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Filozofski fakultet Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:131:756766 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-09-28 Repository / Repozitorij: ODRAZ - open repository of the University of Zagreb Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Odsjek za anglistiku Filozofski fakultet Sveu čilište u Zagrebu Diplomski rad Satan as the hero of Paradise Lost Književno-kulturološki smjer Kandidat: Mak Tvrtkovi ć Mentor: dr. sc. Tomislav Brlek, izv. prof. Akademska godina: 2018./2019. Table of Contents Introduction: John Milton and Paradise Lost ............................................................................ 2 Paradise Lost in short .............................................................................................................. 4 Heroic Devil ....................................................................................................................... 5 Types of heroes .......................................................................................................................... 8 Prometheus and Satan ........................................................................................................... 12 Milton as Satan, Satan as Milton .................................................................................... -
Information to Users
INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfrlm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from anytype of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is d^endoit upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margin^, and inqnoper alignment can adverse^ affea reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these wül be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note wiD indicate the deletioxL Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlays. Eadi original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photogr^hic prints are availablea iq rfor photogr^hs or illustrations ^jpearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800.521-0600 THE STRUCTURE OF SOCRATIC DIALOGUE: AN ARISTOTELIAN ANALYSIS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Robert L. -
Dramatic Structure from Aristotle to Modern Times
Drama Dr. Abdel-Fattah Adel Upon the completion of this section, you will be able to: 1. To define "plot" as an element of drama 2. To summarize the development of the understanding of the dramatic structure from Aristotle to modern times. 3. To recognize the parts Freytag's pyramid of the development of dramatic plot. 4. To state the main criticism to Freytag's pyramid. 5. To apply Freytag's pyramid on a story line. Plot Dramatic structure Plot is a literary term for the events a story comprises, particularly as they relate to one another in a pattern, a sequence, through cause and effect, or by coincidence. It is the artistic arrangement of a sequence of events. Dramatic structure is the structure of a dramatic work such as a play or film. There is no difference between plot and dramatic structure. •Agree •Don’t agree There is no difference between plot and dramatic structure. Plot is related to the arrangement of the events. Dramatic structure is the overall layout of the story. There can be more than one plot in a play. •Agree •Don’t agree There can be more than one plot in a play. The play may contain a main plot a several sub-plots. Aristotle Horace Freytag In his Poetics, Aristotle considered plot ("mythos") the most important element of drama—more important than character, for example. He put forth the idea that ("A whole is what has a beginning and middle and end. This three-part view of a plot structure (with a beginning, middle, and end – technically, the protasis, epitasis, and catastrophe) must causally relate to one another as being either necessary, or probable.