The Gazette of India

REGISTERED No. D. (D)-73 The Gazette of India PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY No. 12] NEW DELHI, SATURDAY, MARCH 20, 1976/PHALGUNA 30, 1897 Separate paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii) Statutory orders and notifications issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (other than the Ministry of Defence) by Central Authorities (other than the Administrations of Union Territories) CABINET SECRETARIAT (Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms) New Delhi, the 28th February, 1976 S.O. 1078.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (6) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri P. R. Namjoshi, Advocate, Bombay, as a Special Public Prosecutor for conducting the prosecution of the accused persons in case R. C. No. 60/71 of the Special Police Establish- ment, Bombay, in State Vs. Shri B. P. Garwala, Ex-Head Shroff and Shri Aziz Sultan Hajeebhoy, Ex-Agent, Union Bank of India, Bombay, before the court of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bombay, or in the Court of any other Metropoli- tan Magistrate nominated by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate. [No. 225/75/75-AVD. II] B. C. VANJANI, Under Secy. 157 GI/75—1 (1277) 1278 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 20, 1976/PHALGUNA 30, 1897 [PART IJ- ORDER New Delhi, the 18th February, 1976 S.O. 1688.—Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied lhat Shri Himathbai Girdhabhai Patel, Malav Bhagol, Petlad, District Kaira (Gujarat), a contesting candidate in the general election held in June, 1975 to the Gujarat Legislative Assembly from 135-PetIad Constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his election expenses as required by the Re- presentation of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder ; And whereas the said candidate, even after due notices, has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good reaion or justification for such failure ; ELECTION COMMISSION Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the said ORDER Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said Shri New Delhi, the 17th February, 1976 Himutbhai Girdhabhai Patel to be disqualified for being S.O. 1079.—Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of that Shri Uga Jetha Parmar, Vankar Vas, Khorasa Oil, Taluka Parliament or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Malia, District Junagadh (Gujarat), a contesting candidate in the general election held in .Tune, 1975, to the Gujarat Council of a State for a period of three years from the date Legislative Assembly from 41-Maliya Constitency, as failed of this order. to lodge an account of his election expenses in the manner required by the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and [No. GJ/LA/135/75(21)] the Rules made thereunder; And whereas the said candidate, even after due notices, has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good reason or justification for such failure ; Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the said Act, (he Election Commission hereby declares the said Shri Ugn Jetha Parmar to be disqualified for being chosen aa, and for beinfi, a member of either House of Parliament or of ths Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a State for a period of three years from the date of this order. [No. GJ/LA/41/75(20)] SEC. 3(ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 20, 1976/PHALGUNA 30, 1897 1279 ORDER And whereas the said candidate, even after due notices, has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and the New Delhi, the 25th February, 1976 Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good reason or justification for such failure ; SO. 1081.—Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied that Shri N. Manickam, 11/30, R. H. S. Sastry Road, Ram- Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the said nagar, Coimbatore (Tamil Nadu), a contesting candidate for Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said Shri the bye-election lo the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly he'd Motimm Jcrambhai Patel, to be disqualified for being chosen in February, 1974 from 105-Coimbatore West constituency, as, and for being, a member of cither House of Parliament has failed lo lodge an account of his election expenses within or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a the time and in the manner required by the Representation State for a period of three years from the date of this order. of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder; [No. GJ-LA/173/75/(22)] And whereas the said candidate, even after due notices, has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and the V. NAGASUBRAMANAIN, Secy. Election Commission is further satisfied that he has no good reason or justification for such failure ; Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the 6aid Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said Shri N. Manickam to be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being a member of either House of Parliament or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a State for a period of three years from the date of this order. [No. TN-LA/105/74(Byr)(74)] ORDER New Delhi, the 1st March, 1976 S.O. 1083.—Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied that Shri Ram Prakash Paswan, Village & P.O. Maheshwara, via Khajauli, District Darbhanga (Bihar) who was a contesting candidate for election to the Bihar Legislative Assem- bly from 82-Rajnagar (SC) constituency held in March, 1972 has failed to lodge an account of his election expenses in the manner as required by the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder; ORDER And whereas after considering the representation made by the said candidate, the Election Commission is satisfied that New Delhi, the 2nd March, 1976 he has no good reason or justification for such failure ; S.O. 1082.—Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the said (hat Shri Motimm jerambhai Patel, At Kadiawad, Navsari, Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said Shri Ram Prakash Paswan to be disqualified for being chosen as, Takikii Navsuri, District Bulsar (Gujarat), a contesting candi- and for being, a member of cither House of Parliament or date in the general election held in Junet 1975 to the Gujarat of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a State Legislative Assembly from 173-Jalalpore constituency, has for a period of three years from the date of this order. an "ailed lo lodge account of his election expenses within [No. BR-LA/82/72(218» the time and in the manner required by the Representation k of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder; A. N. SEN, Secy. 1280 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 20, 1976/PHALGUNA 30, 1897 [PART II— MINISTRY OF LAW, JUSTICE AND COMPANY AHFATRS (Department of Legal Affairs) New Delhi, the 9th February, 1976 S.O.I084.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the Destruction of Records Act, 1917 (5 of 1917), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (Destruction of Records) Rules, 1946, namely:- 1. (1) These Rules may be called the Income-tax Appellate Tri- bunal (Destruction of Records) Amendment Rules, 1976. (2) They shall come into force on the date of their publica- tion of the official Gazette. 2. For rule 2 of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (Destruc- tion in Records) Rules, 1946, the following shall be substituted, namely :- "2. The records and registers of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal specified in column 1 of the following Table may be destroyed at the end of the period specified in the corresponding entry• in column 2 thereof; namely:— TABLE Reoords or registers Period (1) (2) I. APPEAL RECORDS: (A) Where reference applica- 6 years from the date of the tion has been filed and case Tribunal's final order in the stated. appeal passed conformably to the judgment of the High Court or tho Supcme Court, as the case may be. (B) Where reference applica- 6 years from the date of the tion has been filed but case Tribunal's order/High Cour t not stated. order rejecting the application. (C) Where no reference app- 6 years from the date of the lication has been filed. Tribunal's order disposing of the appeal. (D) Acquisition appeals. 6 years from the date of the order of the Tribunal or High Court, as the case may be. SEC 3fii)l THE GAZETTE OF INDTA : MARCH 20, 1976/PHALGUNA 30, 1897 1281 1 2 II. Reference Application Records: 6 years from the date of the Tribunal's final order in the (A) Where case stated. connected appeal. 6 years from the date of the Tribunal's order/High Court's (B) Where case not stated. order rejecting the application- III. Register of Disposals 3 years from the latest date of disposal of appeal in the register. IV. O'her Records 3 years from the date of the last (excluding Register of en)ry. Appeals ;md Rtrgiskr of Reference Application which stw.ll be retained permanently). [No. A. 6001 l(1)/73-Adm. TII(LA)] N. D. SINHA, Under Secy. MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue & Insurance) (Legislative Department) New Delhi, the 12th February, 1976 New Delhi, the 27th February, 1976 INCOME TAX S.O.

Load more