DOCSLIB.ORG

CRPT-116Hrpt438.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CRPT-116Hrpt438.Pdf 116TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 116–438 PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 2) TO AUTHORIZE FUNDS FOR FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS, HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAMS, AND TRANSIT PROGRAMS, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES JUNE 29, 2020.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed Mr. MORELLE, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following R E P O R T [To accompany H. Res. 1028] The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House Resolution 1028, by a record vote of 8 to 4, report the same to the House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2, the Moving Forward Act, under a structured rule. The resolution provides two hours of general debate on the bill equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of the bill. The resolution provides that an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 116–54, modified by the amendment printed in Part A of this report, shall be considered as adopted and the bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. The resolution waives all points of order against provisions in the bill, as amend- ed. Section 2 of the resolution provides that following general de- bate, it shall be in order for the chair of the Committee on Trans- portation and Infrastructure or his designee to offer an amendment en bloc consisting of the further amendments printed in part B of this report. The amendment en bloc shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure or their respective designees, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question. Section 3 of the resolution pro- vides that after consideration of the amendment en bloc described in section 2, it shall be in order for the chair of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure or his designee to offer an amendment en bloc consisting of the further amendments printed 99–008 VerDate Sep 11 2014 14:50 Jul 01, 2020 Jkt 099008 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR438.XXX HR438 rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with HEARING 2 in part C of this report. The amendment en bloc shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for 30 minutes equally divided and con- trolled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Com- mittee on Transportation and Infrastructure or their respective designees, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be sub- ject to a demand for division of the question. Section 4 of the reso- lution provides that after consideration of the amendment en bloc described in section 3, it shall be in order for the chair of the Com- mittee on Transportation and Infrastructure or his designee to offer an amendment en bloc consisting of the further amendments print- ed in part D of this report. The amendment en bloc shall be consid- ered as read, shall be debatable for 30 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Com- mittee on Transportation and Infrastructure or their respective designees, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be sub- ject to a demand for division of the question. Section 5 of the reso- lution provides that after consideration of the amendment en bloc described in section 4, it shall be in order for the chair of the Com- mittee on Transportation and Infrastructure or his designee to offer an amendment en bloc consisting of the further amendments print- ed in part E of this report. The amendment en bloc shall be consid- ered as read, shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Com- mittee on Transportation and Infrastructure or their respective designees, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be sub- ject to a demand for division of the question. Section 6 of the reso- lution provides that after consideration of the amendment en bloc described in section 5, it shall be in order for the chair of the Com- mittee on Transportation and Infrastructure or his designee to offer an amendment en bloc consisting of the further amendments print- ed in part F of this report. The amendment en bloc shall be consid- ered as read, shall be debatable for 30 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Com- mittee on Transportation and Infrastructure or their respective designees, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be sub- ject to a demand for division of the question. Section 7 of the reso- lution provides that after consideration of the amendment en bloc described in section 6, it shall be in order for the ranking minority member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure or his designee to offer an amendment en bloc consisting of the fur- ther amendments printed in part G of this report. The amendment en bloc shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for 30 min- utes equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking mi- nority member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastruc- ture or their respective designees, shall not be subject to amend- ment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the ques- tion. Section 8 of the resolution provides that after consideration of the amendment en bloc described in section 7, each further amend- ment printed in part H of this report shall be considered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be de- batable for the time specified in the report equally divided and con- trolled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question. Section 9 of the resolution provides that prior to the VerDate Sep 11 2014 14:50 Jul 01, 2020 Jkt 099008 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR438.XXX HR438 rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with HEARING 3 offering of an amendment en bloc pursuant to sections 2 through 7, the chair of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure or his designee may designate amendments that shall not be con- sidered as part of the amendment en bloc. The resolution provides that any amendment designated pursuant to section 9 shall be in order after consideration of the further amendments printed in part H if offered by a Member designated in this report, shall be debatable for 10 minutes equally divided and controlled by the pro- ponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question. The resolution waives all points of order against amendments en bloc described in sections 2 through 7 and the further amendments de- scribed in sections 8 and 9. The resolution provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions. EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS The waiver of all points of order against consideration of H.R. 2 includes waivers of the following: • Clause 3(d) of rule XIII, which requires the inclusion of a committee cost estimate in a committee report. A CBO cost es- timate on H.R. 2 was not available at the time the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure filed its report. • Clause 3(e) of rule XIII, which requires the inclusion of a comparative print for a bill proposing to repeal or amend a statute. • Clause 12(a)(1) of rule XXI, which prohibits consideration of a bill unless there is a searchable electronic comparative print that shows how the bill proposes to change current law. • Clause 12(b) of rule XXI, which prohibits consideration of a bill unless there is a searchable electronic comparative print that shows how the text of the bill as proposed to be considered differs from the text of the bill as reported. • Section 306 of the Congressional Budget Act, which pro- hibits consideration of legislation within the jurisdiction of the Committee on the Budget unless referred to or reported by the Budget Committee. The waiver of all points of order against provisions in H.R. 2, as amended, includes waivers of the following: • Clause 4 of rule XXI, which prohibits reporting a bill car- rying an appropriation from a committee not having jurisdic- tion to report an appropriation. • Clause 5(a) of rule XXI, which prohibits a bill carrying a tax or tariff measure from being reported by a committee not having jurisdiction to report tax or tariff measures. Although the resolution waives all points of order against the amendments en bloc described in sections 2 through 7 of the reso- lution, the further amendments described in section 8, and the fur- ther amendments described in section 9, the Committee is not aware of any points of order. The waiver is prophylactic in nature. COMMITTEE VOTES The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion to report, together with the names of those voting for and against, are printed below: VerDate Sep 11 2014 14:50 Jul 01, 2020 Jkt 099008 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR438.XXX HR438 rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with HEARING 4 Rules Committee record vote No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • State Advances Designation of First Section of I-14 in Bell County
    State Advances Designation of First Section of I-14 in Bell County April 28, 2016 AUSTIN - The Texas Transportation Commission Thursday took the next major step in making the first section of Interstate 14 a reality in Central Texas. The commission voted to submit an application that is part of a multi-step process that will lead to designation of an existing 25-mile stretch of US 190 freeway in Bell County as I-14. The highway section from Copperas Cove and Fort Hood east to I-35 in Belton has been undergoing upgrades in recent years and additional widening projects are planned. The commission is petitioning the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) to include the segment of US 190 as part of the national Interstate Highway System as I-14. Separately, the Texas Department of Transportation is working with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to review elements of the existing highway to confirm they meet interstate highway design standards. That review is expected to be complete later this year. Once authorized by FHWA, the final designation can be approved by the Texas Transportation Commission and I-14 signs can be added to the highway and to directional signage on Interstate 35 and other intersecting roadways. The federal highway bill approved by Congress last year designated the Central Texas Corridor and established it as future Interstate 14. The congressionally designated corridor generally follows the route of US 190 across the state running from I-10 in West Texas to Fort Hood at Killeen and east through Belton, Bryan/College Station, Huntsville, Livingston, Woodville and Jasper before terminating at the Sabine River near Fort Polk.
    [Show full text]
  • Fivestate 2021 Map
    Five-State Expansion of the Congressionally Designated Interstate 14 Corridor Midland-Odessa, Texas to Augusta, Georgia FORT GORDON 40 MAXWELL AFB 20 ENGLAND MISSISSIPPI ALABAMA Atlanta 25 AIR PARK Wrens Augusta Birmingham 85 30 Macon 95 FORT BLISS TEXASBARNETT CAMP BEAUREGARD 20 Columbus Selma Phenix 16 PERMIAN Fort Worth HAYNESVILLE City Dallas Meridian BASIN BOSSIER Shreveport 20 Jackson Port of Demopolis 20 U.S. Montgomery Savannah Midland FORT HOOD U.S. I-14N GEORGIA San 59 LOUISIANA 80 El Paso Odessa Brookhaven Laurel 75 TEXAS Angelo 35 Natchez U.S. U.S. Lufkin U.S. 158 U.S. Eden Hattiesburg 65 190 45 Leesville FORT 385 87 Woodville Jasper Alexandria 84 FORT I-14S U.S. STEWART 10 Brady Temple Huntsville Pineville BENNING U.S. Belton 49 ROBINS U.S. 55 83 Livingston 59 10U.S. AFB Menard Killeen 84 U.S. 49 84 14 Bryan/ U.S. GOODFELLOW 69 96 Baton Junction Austin College 10 Port of AFB Station Lumberton Rouge Gulfport FORT 10 Seguin Port of New RUCKER Houston Beaumont Orleans San Antonio Port of FORT Interstate 14/Gulf Coast 69 Port Arthur POLK CAMP KESSLER Strategic Highway System 37 SHELBY AFB 1-14 Central Texas Corridor EAGLE Coastal Rening, LNG, FORDJT BASE U.S. Petrochemical, (Designated in 2015 FAST Act) SAN 181 ANTONIO Metal Processing Hubs Port of Proposed: Corpus Christi Expanded Central Texas Corridor Central Louisiana Corridor Central Mississippi Corridor CORPUS CHRISTI Middle Alabama Corridor ARMY DEPOT Middle Georgia Corridor Multiple Connectors to I-10 El Camino East/West Corridor Strategic Military Seaports (Conversion to 4-Lane; no grade separations or access roads) Lines shown generally reflect proposed corridor-level designation language.
    [Show full text]
  • Real-Time Information Dissemination Requirements for Illinois Per New Federal Rule: Project Extension (Phase Ii)
    CIVIL ENGINEERING STUDIES Illinois Center for Transportation Series No. 16-008 UILU-ENG-2016-2008 ISSN: 0197-9191 REAL-TIME INFORMATION DISSEMINATION REQUIREMENTS FOR ILLINOIS PER NEW FEDERAL RULE: PROJECT EXTENSION (PHASE II) Prepared By Ryan Fries Antoun Fadoul MD Toushik Ahmed Niloy Veda Vyas Md. Atiquzzaman Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Research Report No. FHWA-ICT-16-008 A report of the findings of ICT-R27-119 Real-Time Information Dissemination Requirements for Illinois per New Federal Rule: Project Extension (Phase II) Illinois Center for Transportation February 2016 TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-ICT-16-008 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Real-time Information Dissemination Requirements for Illinois per New February 2016 Federal Rule: Project Extension (Phase II) 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Ryan Fries, Antoun Fadoul, MD Toushik Ahmed Niloy, Veda Vyas, and Md. Report No. Atiquzzaman ICT-16-008 UILU-ENG-2016-2008 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Department of Civil Engineering Southern Illinois University Edwardsville 11. Contract or Grant No. Edwardsville, IL 62026 R27-119, Phase II 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Illinois Department of Transportation (SPR) Covered Bureau of Material and Physical Research Final Report, 8/16/2013 –12/31/2015 126 East Ash Street 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Springfield, IL 62704 FHWA 15. Supplementary Notes Conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract To satisfy the provisions of 23 CFR 511, state departments of transportations and other transportation agencies were required to establish real-time systems management information programs by November 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Advisory Committee January 3, 2017 2:00 P.M. 916 Main Street, 2Nd Floor Conference Room Lubbock, Texas
    Transportation Advisory Committee January 3, 2017 2:00 p.m. 916 Main Street, 2nd Floor Conference Room Lubbock, Texas 1. Call to Order of the Transportation Advisory Committee. 2. Acknowledgement of Quorum of the Transportation Advisory Committee. 3. Safety Procedures. 4. Public Comment Period/Acknowledgement of Guests of the Transportation Advisory Committee. 5. Approval of the October 4, 2016 Transportation Advisory Committee meeting minutes. 6. Consider a Resolution approving the 2016 Annual Performance and Expenditure Report and Listing of Obligated Projects to advance to the Policy Committee. 7. Discuss the status of the 2017/2020 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). 8. Consider a Resolution supporting the extension of I27 to advance to the Policy Committee. 9. Reports: Cities and County TxDOT Citibus LPD/DPS Texas Tech University Director’s AGENDA ITEM 1 Call to Order of the Transportation Advisory Committee. AGENDA ITEM 2 Acknowledgement of the Quorum of the Transportation Advisory Committee. AGENDA ITEM 3 Safety Procedures. Discussion: None Staff Recommendation: Review Safety Procedures Employee or Public Accident In the event that an emergency or serious illness of an employee or visitor while in this meeting: 1. Call 911 2. Call Courthouse security at 775-1547 or 775-1548. a. Provide address b. Type of emergency c. Do not move injured or ill person d. Designate someone to wait for the ambulance at the main Entrance Doors. e. HOLD elevator (same person who will wait for Emergency Personnel) Tornado or Inclement Weather When a tornado warning has been issued by the National Weather Service the office contacts will be notified by Courthouse Security and an automatic alarm system will sound: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Rural and Urban America PART3OF a SERIES
    August 2010 Transportation Reboot: Restarting America’s Most Essential Operating System The Case for Capacity: To Unlock Gridlock, Generate Jobs, Deliver Freight, and Connect Communities Connecting Rural and Urban America http://ExpandingCapacity.transportation.org PART3OF A SERIES AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS Acknowledgements Much of the material cited in this report, including the estimates of capacity increases required, is drawn from research published in May 2007 by the Transportation Research Board’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). The report, Future Options for the Interstate and Defense Highway System, can be accessed at http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/trbnet/ acl/NCHRP_20-24_52Task10_NCHRPFinal.pdf. The objective of the research project was to develop a potential vision for the future of the U.S. Interstate Highway System. The report was prepared by a study team led by David Gehr and Steve Lockwood of PB Consult, Gary Maring of Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Kevin E. Heanue, and Alan E. Pisarski. The research was sponsored by AASHTO and the Federal Highway Administration, and was guided by a panel chaired by Harold E. Linnenkohl, Georgia DOT (retired); and included Allen D. Biehler, P.E., Secretary, Pennsylvania DOT; John F. Conrad, P.E., Washington State DOT; Dr. David J. Forkenbrock, University of Iowa; Dr. Clay McShane, Northeastern University; Debra L. Miller, Secretary, Kansas DOT; Thomas E. Norton, Colorado DOT (formerly); Kenneth Orski, Urban Mobility Corporation; Dr. Bruce E. Seely, Michigan Technological University; MG David A. Sprynczynatyk, North Dakota Army National Guard; and LTG Kenneth R. Wykle, National Defense Transportation Association. The analysis period considered in the Future Options report was the 30 years from 2005 to 2035.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Texas on the MOVE
    Central Texas ON THE MOVE 2180 N. Main Street Belton, TX 76513 Spring 2017 Central Texas Gets a New Interstate Contact Us On January 26, 2017 the Texas Transportation Commission approved Contact us for more the designation of a part of US 190 in Central Texas as Interstate 14. information about our US 190 from the US 190 bypass in Copperas Cove to I-35 in Belton services. will now be I-14. This 25 mile section of I-14 is the beginning of a much larger transportation network that will improve connections, Killeen-Temple MPO freight mobility, safety and security throughout Central Texas. 2180 N. Main Street The Gulf Coast Strategic Highway System Belton, TX 76513 A “Forts to Ports” highway network was first conceived in the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act or SAFETEA-LU passed in 2005 which (254) 770-2200 included the 14th Amendment Highway. The 14th Amendment Highway Corridor was [email protected] designed to connect military forts in Mississippi, Alabama and Georgia through an interstate system to strategic ports to meet the needs of military transportation. As the Visit us on the web at: idea of “Forts to Ports” gained momentum, there were considerations to extend this corridor westward for a “Forts to Ports” highway system to serve military bases in www.ktmpo.org Louisiana and Texas. In This Issue Interstate 14 City Feature: Harker Heights MTP Project Reprioritization Air Quality Update Freight Advisory Committee Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee SH317 Construction Update Upcoming Bike Rides Source: Gulf Coast Strategic Highway Coalition. For more information, please visit the Gulf -Salado Smokin’ Spokes Coast Strategic Highway Coaltion’s website at www.gulfcoaststrategichighway.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Master I14 TX LA MS Map 6.8.2020.Ai
    3-State Expansion of the Congressionally 30 Designated Interstate 14 Corridor Congressional Action Red River Needed to Add Texarkana LA 8, LA 28, US 84 & Congressional Action Army Depot I-59/US 49 Routes Needed to Add 30 to I-14 Corridor US 87/SH 158, US 83 & Fort US 385 to the Worth FUTURE 369 I-14 Central Texas Corridor Shreveport Dallas 20 20 20 Jackson Meridian Fort 20 Bliss FUTURE Midland Garden 49 Odessa City Sterling U.S. 55 59 El Paso 14 City FUTURE 69 Camp 84 FUTURE Goodfellow Vidalia U.S. 158 U.S. Beauregard FUTURE 84 U.S. Fort 96 Laurel 20 AFB Waco FUTURE Archie 14 Pecos Crane 87 Natchez Brookhaven Hood Lufkin 28 U.S. San Angelo 14 14 385 Copperas Leesville 14 28 Alexandria Hattiesburg McCamey Eden San Cove FUTURE Brady Saba 63 Pineville Lampasas Temple Madisonville U.S. Camp 305 U.S. Belton U.S. Killeen 190 Jasper 190 Menard 190 Cameron 14 Shelby Fort Huntsville 49 U.S. Stockton U.S. 195 Rockdale Woodville Fort 83 Georgetown Baton 49 Bryan Livingston Kirbyville Polk Rouge Junction U.S. Pascagoula Round College U.S. Rock 69 Silsbee Fredericksburg Station 96 Biloxi oll Austin Lumberton T Gulfport 69 Beaumont Lockhart Houston New Port Arthur Orleans Joint Base Seguin Port of Beaumont Gulf Coast Strategic San Antonio San Antonio Port of Port Arthur Military Celebrating America’s Highway System 123 Deployment Ports Newest Interstate Highway Karnes City Pleasanton Kenedy Congressional Action 37 U.S. Needed to Add I-14 Central Texas Corridor 181 US 96 & US 69 to the (Congressionally Designated in 2015 FAST Act) Three Rivers Beeville I-14 Central Texas Corridor George West Proposed I-14 System Designations Sinton Key System Connectors to Upgrade Portland - La Quinta Port of Pending congressional legislaton (HR 2220) would extend the current I-14 Central Texas Corpus Laredo Corpus Christi Corridor designation west to Odessa.
    [Show full text]
  • Sls 16Rs-2367 Original 2016
    SLS 16RS-2367 ORIGINAL 2016 Regular Session SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 90 BY SENATOR JOHN SMITH CONGRESS. Memorialize Congress to designate the LA 8/LA 28 corridor as Future I-14. 1 A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 2 To memorialize the Congress of the United States to designate the Louisiana Highway 3 8/Louisiana Highway 28 corridor as Future Interstate 14. 4 WHEREAS, Interstate 14 (I-14), also known as the "14th Amendment Highway", 5 the Gulf-Coast Strategic Highway, and the Central Texas Corridor is a proposed interstate 6 highway from Texas to Georgia; the original conceptual western terminus of the highway 7 was from Natchez, Mississippi, and later from I-49 near Alexandria, Louisiana, extending 8 east through the states of Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama, ending at Augusta, Georgia 9 or North Augusta, South Carolina; and 10 WHEREAS, advocates of the Gulf-Coast Strategic Highway proposed extending I-14 11 to the I-10 near Fort Stockton and the junction of US 277 and I-10 near Sonora, Texas; and 12 WHEREAS, the proposal for the 14th Amendment Highway has its origins in the 13 Safe, Accountable, Flexible Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users 14 (SAFETEA-LU); and 15 WHEREAS, the study and planning of I-14 has continued because of support and 16 interest from both the Congress and the associated state highway departments; and 17 WHEREAS, the I-14 corridor provides a national strategic link to numerous major 18 military bases and major Gulf Coast and Atlantic ports used for overseas deployments in six Page 1 of 3 SLS 16RS-2367 ORIGINAL SCR NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Ports-To-Plains Conference September 15, 2016
    Ports-To-Plains Conference September 15, 2016 US 190 –BELL COUNTY, Texas Gulf Coast Strategic Highway Coalition Polk County at the Crossroads Polk County 2001 1993 - Alliance for I-69 Texas organized 2001 - Gulf Coast Strategic Alliance organized 2008 2 23-Years of I-69 Advocacy . The Alliance for I-69 Texas was formed in 1993 by elected officials and economic development organizations . All segments of route are represented in Alliance . Have an executive director plus Washington and State Capitol representation . Persistence has helped build support from lawmakers, governor, Transportation Commission and local communities Alliance for I‐69 Texas 3 The I-69 System in Texas . 1,070 system miles including I-69E, I-69C, I-69W, I-369, SH 44, I-169 and I-2 . One-third of Texas population lives in the 35 counties on the I-69 Routes . Already a very important freight corridor and connecting route . Includes some long rural sections through low population areas . Connects population centers, seaports, distribution points, and border ports of entry . Houston Metro – 6.4 million . RG Valley & Laredo – 2.1 million . Mexico Rio Grande – 1.7 million . Corpus Christi Metro – 427,000 . Texarkana Metro – 144,000 . Victoria Metro – 122,000 Alliance for I‐69 Texas 4 Signed Sections . Signed Miles . Rio Grande Valley – 120 (including I-169 and I-2 connector) . Corpus Christi – 7.8 . Houston Area – 75 . Texarkana – 3.5 . Laredo – 1.4 . TOTAL – 207 MILES . 279 miles are in planning studies and environmental . 128 miles are in final design and right-of-way acquisition Blue Represents . 110 miles are constructed or Sections Now at under construction including Freeway Standard projects in Fort Bend, Victoria, Nueces, Kleberg and Angelina Counties Alliance for I‐69 Texas 2011: First I-69 Section Signed Alliance for I‐69 Texas CORPUS CHRISTI/ROBSTOWN 6 2013: Sugar Land Signing Ceremony HOUSTON/SUGAR LAND 7 2013: I-69E/I-2 Ceremony in Harlingen Alliance for I‐69 Texas 8 2013: I-69C/I-2 Ceremony in Pharr Alliance for I‐69 Texas 9 Texarkana Sign Unveiling – Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Minute Record Volume 2019 March 19, 2019 Page 1Xx
    Official Minute Record Volume 2019 March 19, 2019 Page 1xx RESOLUTION 2019-0xx A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE DESIGNATION OF AN EXTENSION OF INTERSTATE 27 AS A FUTURE INTERSTATE IN TEXAS WHEREAS, Congress has already designated the Ports-to-Plains Corridor in Texas as a High Priority Corridor on the National Highway System; and WHEREAS, the Texas Department of Transportation published an Initial Assessment Report on the Extension of I-27/Ports to Plains Corridor in November , 2015 which stated: “The corridor will continue to be a critical link to state, national and international trade, growing population centers and critical energy and agricultural business sectors”; and WHEREAS, according to the Texas Freight Mobility Plan, “By 2040 over 73 percent of Texas’ population and 82 percent of the state’s employment is projected to be located within five miles of an interstate”; and WHEREAS, Texas has no major north-south interstate west of Interstate 35; and WHEREAS, the Texas Freight Mobility Plan notes that further investment alone on I-35 will not fix the problem saying, “The state must focus not only on improving existing facilities, but also on developing future freight corridors to move products to markets and exports”; and WHEREAS, the Texas Freight Mobility Plan goes on to recommend that TxDOT, “give additional consideration to the extension or designation of other interstate routes. Examples include I-27 and upgrades to portions of US Highway 190 to interstate standards”; and WHEREAS, the proposed extension of Interstate 27 connects
    [Show full text]
  • City Council Regular Meeting June 4, 2019
    City Council Regular Meeting June 4, 2019 A G E N D A CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY JUNE 4, 2019, AT 5:30 P.M. CST COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MONROE STREET, EAGLE PASS, MAVERICK COUNTY, TEXAS ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM MOMENT OF REVERENCE CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS 1. Presentation of award to retired officer Jaime L. Rodriguez for 21 years of service with the Eagle Pass Police Department. 2. Presentation of Proclamation for: • Code Enforcement Officers Week 3. City of Eagle Pass/BBVA Compass Bank Stars of the Month June • Mia Silva (Glass Elementary) • Adrian Rodriguez (Armando Cerna Elementary) MINUTES 4. Approval of the minutes for May 7, May 10, and May 17, 2019. REPORTS 5. Monthly Departmental A. Bridge B. Finance/Grants C. Fire D. Human Resources E. International Center for Trade/Main Street F. Library G. Municipal Court H. Parks & Recreation I. Planning & Building J. Police/Code Enforcement K. Public Works/City Shop L. Tax ORDINANCES 6. Consideration and possible approval of an ordinance amending Section 26-204(b), Article VIII, Chapter 26 (Traffic) of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Eagle Pass, by deleting the existing school zone on U. S. HWY 277 south approximately five hundred and fifty feet (550') west of Foster Maldonado Blvd., and approximately five hundred and fifty (550') south of said Blvd.; finding that the meeting at which this ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law; providing a severability clause; and establishing an effective date. 7. Third and final
    [Show full text]
  • EXHIBIT D Plains Corridor from the Northern Tip of Texas to Laredo
    A RESOLUTION BY SUTTON COUNTY SUPPORTING THE EXTENSION OF INTERSTATE 27 ALONG THE PORTS-TO-PLAINS CORRIDOR SOUTH OF LUBBOCK. WHEREAS, Congress has already designated the Ports-to-Plains Corridor in Texas as a High Priority Corridor on the National Highway System; and WHEREAS, the Texas Department of Transportation published an Initial Assessment Report on the Extension of1-27 /Ports to Plains Corridor in November , 2015 which stated: "The corridor will continue to be a critical link to state, national and international trade, growing population centers and critical energy and agricultural business sectors"; and WHEREAS, according to the Texas Freight Mobility Plan, "By 2040 over 73 percent of Texas' population and 82 percent of the state's employment is projected to be located within five miles of an interstate"; and WHEREAS, Texas has no major north-south interstate west of Interstate 35; and WHEREAS, the Texas Freight Mobility Plan notes that further investment alone on 1-35 will not fix the problem saying, "The state must focus not only on improving existing facilities, but also on developing future freight corridors to move products to markets and exports"; and WHEREAS, the Texas Freight Mobility Plan goes on to recommend that TxDOT, "give additional consideration to the extension or designation of other interstate routes. Examples include 1-27 and upgrades to portions of US Highway 190 to interstate standards"; and WHEREAS, the proposed extension oflnterstate 27 connects major West Texas population and economic centers including
    [Show full text]