DOCSLIB.ORG

Table 2: Examining Authority's General Questions Arising from the Draft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table 2: Examining Authority's General Questions Arising from the Draft A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down (Stonehenge) Wiltshire TR010025 Wiltshire Council Response to Examining Authority’s (ExA) First Round of Written Questions Table of Contents Wiltshire Council Response to Examining Authority’s Questions ............................... 2 Appendices .............................................................................................................184 Appendix A – Glossary of Terms .........................................................................185 Appendix B – CH.1.30 – Heritage Monitoring and Advisory Group (HMAG) Draft Terms of Reference ............................................................................................189 Appendix C – Fg.1.22 – EA Fluvial Design Guide ..................................................195 Appendix D – WM.1.14 - Wiltshire and Swindon Waste Core Strategy (Policies 5 and 6) .................................................................................................................200 A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down (TR010025) WILTSHIRE COUNCIL RESPONSE TO EXAMINING AUTHORITY’S QUESTIONS Question Question: Question Response: ExQ 1 to: G.1 General and cross-topic questions G.1.2 Applicant Document 7.1 - Case for the scheme and NPS Comprehensive survey of the footprint of the Scheme accordance, paragraph 7.2.5, states that the and the surrounding area within a calculated zone of Applicant is not aware of any respect in which influence has been undertaken and has identified those deciding the application in accordance with the habitats and species likely to be adversely affected by National Policy Statement for National Networks the proposal. The survey data has been used to (NPSNN) would be unlawful. The RR of the inform a robust mitigation strategy for the Scheme. Stonehenge Alliance [RR-1898] submits that the approval of the scheme would be contrary to The Environmental Impact Assessment Directive A full Environmental Impact Assessment has been (85/337/EEC); The Habitats Directive (Council completed and the results used to inform the Scheme Directive 92/43/EEC); The Conservation of design and the mitigation strategy. Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 (Habitats Regulations) in respect of the Salisbury Plain SPA and River Avon SAC; The Bern Convention on the The European legislation (derived from EU Council Conservation of European Wildlife and Habitats; Directives) is implemented in the UK under the The Birds Directive (2009/147/EC) in respect of Habitats Regulations. A full Appropriate Assessment Annex I species; The Aarhus Convention, in under the Habitats Regulations has been undertaken in respect of genuine public participation in respect of all European sites potentially affected by the - 2 - A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down (TR010025) Question Question: Question Response: ExQ 1 to: environmental decision-making; The European proposed Scheme (within a calculated zone of Convention on the protection of the influence). This has considered the impacts and the Archaeological Heritage; The European Landscape mitigation available and implementable. Wiltshire Convention; The SEA Directive (European Council believes that all potential impacts on the Directive 2001/42/EC); The Environmental designated features of all European Sites within the Assessment of Plans and Programmes calculated zone of influence have been correctly Regulations 2004 (Statutory Instrument 2004, identified and sufficient and appropriate mitigation no. 1633) on the environmental impacts of the designed, such that the conclusion of "no likely planned A303/A358 corridor improvements significant effect" on the conservation objectives of the programme alone and in combination; and the named European site, is correct and supported by World Heritage Convention. sufficient and robust evidence. Natural England, the organisation with the overall responsibility for Please respond to the specific points raised in European Sites in England, has agreed the conclusion relation to the potential breach of these of the Appropriate Assessment. directions, regulations and conventions. i) The Council accepts the need for the Scheme. G.1.4 Wiltshire Document 7.1 - Case for the scheme and NPS Council accordance, makes an assessment of the ii) The Council is of the opinion that the Scheme is scheme’s accordance with the NPSNN and broadly compliant with the NPSNN. However, identifies the need for the scheme. with regards to drainage, the Applicant has not i. Does Wiltshire Council accept that the satisfactorily addressed all aspects of the need case for the project, as set out Scheme’s accordance with the NPSNN. therein, is made out? ii. Has the Applicant satisfactorily addressed iii) Wiltshire Council is not in agreement with the Applicant’s climate change allowances for road - 3 - A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down (TR010025) Question Question: Question Response: ExQ 1 to: all aspects of the scheme’s accordance drainage, and the climate change allowances for with the NPSNN? the groundwater assessment is still under discussion. There are outstanding actions from iii. If not, please identify any aspects with the peer review of the flood risk assessment for which the Council disagrees. groundwater, surface water and road drainage. Until the actions are addressed, Wiltshire Council is unable to agree to full compliance with the NPSNN. i) Yes, this is a complete list. G.1.5 Wiltshire Document 7.1 - Case for the scheme and NPS Council accordance, paragraph 7.3.14, identifies the ii) Yes, overall the Scheme would conform with the relevant plans which comprise the development relevant policies of the development plan. plan for the area. Section 3 of the Local Impact Report covers this i. Does that comprise a complete list? matter. ii. Does the Council agree that the scheme would conform with relevant policies of the development plan? iii. If not, please indicate any areas of disagreement with Appendix B.2 – 7. i) Yes, it is agreed. G.1.9 Wiltshire The ES Chapter 15: Assessment of cumulative Council effects, paragraph 15.2.12, makes reference to ii) Yes. consultation with Wiltshire Council as regards the compilation of the long list of identified - 4 - A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down (TR010025) Question Question: Question Response: ExQ 1 to: development, followed by the circulation of a iii) No. short list and the final check. i. Please confirm that the Applicant’s methodology and identification of other development for the purposes of the cumulative assessment is agreed? ii. Please confirm that the list of nine developments set out in paragraph 15.2.20 is agreed? iii. Are there any other proposed developments relevant to the consideration of cumulative impact? G.1.10 Applicant The ES Chapter 15: Assessment of cumulative At the time of the publication of the ES, the ETRO was effects, paragraphs 15.2.20 and 15.4.4, makes in place. It has subsequently been quashed so is no reference to the Experimental Traffic Regulation longer in place. Order (ETRO) on Byways AMES 11 and 12. Please explain further the position as regards the ETRO and the reliance placed upon it in the cumulative assessment. Ag.1 Agriculture - 5 - A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down (TR010025) Question Question: Question Response: ExQ 1 to: Ag.1.2 Wiltshire Agricultural Land Classification i) Wiltshire Council’s Development Plan has no Council In respect of Agricultural Land Classification: specific policies relating to agricultural land i. Please provide any Policies (and supporting classification. As a local planning authority, the text) within the adopted development plan Council takes account of national guidance in relevant to this issue; and paragraph 170 (b) of the NPPF when making decisions where this is a relevant factor. ii. the Council’s assessment of the Proposed Development against these policies. ii) Not Applicable. The Council is aware that loss of best and most versatile agricultural land is a factor to be taken into account in the planning balance, but note that this would be the outcome from any of the routes proposed. i) For Applicant to respond. Ag.1.4 Applicant Agricultural land (access) A number of RRs, including that from the National ii) Wiltshire Council’s public rights of way officers are Farmers’ Union [RR-2252] raise concerns and awaiting design and construction details to be queries in respect of the effect of the use of supplied by the Applicant for Deadline 2. existing and proposed rights of way on agricultural land. iii) As ii) above. i. Please provide a detailed justification for proposed creation of each new public right iv) As ii) above. of way which would affect existing - 6 - A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down (TR010025) Question Question: Question Response: ExQ 1 to: agricultural land? ii. What consideration has been given to prevent any improper use of the existing and proposed Public Rights of Way (PRoW) network (including fly tipping, hare coursing, parking and camping) and how would any measures be secured as part of the DCO? iii. What arrangements would be put in place for the maintenance (including future responsibilities) of any new PRoW including associated infrastructure such as fencing and barriers? iv. The scheme includes the creation of a new restricted byway open to agricultural vehicles along part of the existing A303. How will the surfacing, gates, and other barriers be designed and secured to ensure it is appropriate to allow for access and use by agricultural vehicles? Ag.1.13 Applicant Agricultural land (access) Wiltshire Council’s public rights of way officers would prefer the alignment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • English Heritage Stonehenge Visitor Enhancement Project Planning
    English Heritage Stonehenge Visitor Enhancement Project Planning Submission for Permanent Coach Visitor Facilities & Visitor Transit System Improvements Heritage Impact Assessment April 2016 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Project Background 1 1.2 Consultations 4 2.0 METHODOLOGY 5 2.1 Aims and Scope 5 2.2 Planning and Policy Context 5 2.3 Impact Assessment Methodology 9 3.0 EXISTING BASELINE CONDITIONS 15 3.1 Introduction 15 3.2 Designated Heritage Assets 15 3.3 Historic Development of the Study Area 20 3.4 Monument Groups and Outstanding Universal Value 20 3.5 Sites and Monuments within the Assessment Area 24 4.0 ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS AND MITIGATION 29 4.1 Proposed Works 29 4.2 Mitigation Strategy 32 4.3 Construction Effects 35 4.4 Operational Effects 39 5.0 EFFECTS ON THE OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE OF THE WHS 44 5.1 Introduction 44 5.2 Stonehenge and the Stonehenge Avenue 44 5.3 The Cursus 45 5.4 The Cursus Barrows 46 5.5 The Lesser Cursus and Associated Barrows 46 5.6 The Monarch of the Plain 46 6.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 48 6.1 Effects on the Outstanding Universal Value of the WHS 48 6.2 Effects on Archaeological Remains 50 SVEP Permanent Coach Park April 2016 Heritage Impact Assessment 11110205_SVEP_HIA_V2_CMdw_15-04-16 Chris Blandford Associates REFERENCES 51 GLOSSARY 52 FIGURES 1 Designated Sites and Monuments in the Study and Assessment Areas 2 Scheduled Monuments and Recorded Sites in the Assessment Area 3 Scheme Elements Re-using Previously Developed Land / Reversible Scheme Elements APPENDICES 1 Heritage Impact Assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Sha/21049 Appeal Against Nhs England
    1 Trevelyan Square 4 April 2019 Boar Lane Leeds LS1 6AE REF: SHA/21049 Tel: 0113 86 65500 APPEAL AGAINST NHS ENGLAND SOUTH WEST AREA Fax: 0207 821 0029 TEAM, NHS COMMISSIONING BOARD ("NHS Email: [email protected] ENGLAND") DECISION TO REFUSE AN APPLICATION BY A& H PHARMACIES LTD FOR INCLUSION IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL LIST OFFERING UNFORESEEN BENEFITS UNDER REGULATION 18 WITHIN 450m OF COURTYARD SURGERY, 39 HIGH STREET, WEST LAVINGTON, DEVIZES, WILTSHIRE, SN10 4JB 1 Outcome 1.1 The Pharmacy Appeals Committee (“Committee”), appointed by NHS Resolution, quashes the decision of NHS England and redetermines the application. 1.2 The Committee determined that the application should be refused. NHS Resolution is the operating name of NHS Litigation Authority – we were established in 1995 as a Special Health Authority and are a not-for-profit part of the NHS. Our purpose is to provide expertise to the NHS on resolving concerns fairly, share learning for improvement and preserve resources for patient care. To find out how we use personal information, please read our privacy statement at www.nhsla.com/Pages/How-we-use-your-information-- -FHSAU.aspx 1 Trevelyan Square REF: SHA/21049 Boar Lane Leeds APPEAL AGAINST NHS ENGLAND SOUTH WEST AREA LS1 6AE TEAM, NHS COMMISSIONING BOARD ("NHS Tel: 0113 86 65500 ENGLAND") DECISION TO REFUSE AN APPLICATION Fax: 0207 821 0029 BY A& H PHARMACIES LTD FOR INCLUSION IN THE Email: [email protected] PHARMACEUTICAL LIST OFFERING UNFORESEEN BENEFITS UNDER REGULATION 18 WITHIN 450m OF COURTYARD SURGERY, 39 HIGH STREET, WEST LAVINGTON, DEVIZES, WILTSHIRE, SN10 4JB 1 The Application By application dated 12 June 2017, A&H Pharmacies Ltd (“the Applicant”) applied to NHS Commissioning Board (“NHS England”) for inclusion in the pharmaceutical list offering unforeseen benefits under Regulation 18 within 450m of Courtyard Surgery, 39 High Street, West Lavington, Devizes, Wiltshire, SN10 4JB .
    [Show full text]
  • Amesbury CATG Minutes March 2019 , Item 22. PDF
    MINUTES Meeting: Amesbury Community Area Transport Group (CATG) Place: Redworth Centre, Amesbury Leisure Centre, Amesbury Date: Monday 4 March 2019 Time: 10.00 am Please direct any enquiries on this Agenda to Kate Davey (Traffic Engineer), direct line 01225 713302 or email [email protected] Page 1 AGENDA 1 Note Tracker The following information is included in the attached Note Tracker: • Attendees and Apologies • Approval of notes of the previous meeting • Financial Position • Top 5 Priority Schemes • Other Priority Schemes • New Requests/Issues • Current / ongoing schemes • Other items 2 Date of the next meeting 13th May 2019 Page 2 AMESBURY COMMUNITY AREA TRANSPORT GROUP ACTION NOTES Actions and 03 Item Update Who recommendations Date of meeting: 4th March 2019 1. Attendees and apologies Present: Cllr Mike Hewitt – Wiltshire Council Cllr Robert Yuill – Wiltshire Council Cllr John Smale – Wiltshire Council Andy Cole – Wiltshire Council Highways Kate Davey – Wiltshire Council Highways Jacqui Abbott – Wiltshire Council CEM David Hassett – Shrewton Parish Council Richard Harris – Shrewton Parish Council Trevor Pettitt – Newton Tony Parish Council Roger Fisher – Amesbury Town Council Darrell Amison – Figheldean Parish Council Mark Shuldham – Wylye Parish Council Debby Potter – Tilshead Parish Council Charles Penn – Winterbourne Parish Council John Ellis – Durrington Town Council Graham Jenkins – Bulford Parish Council Steven Cocking – Idmiston Parish Council Apologies: Cllr Graham Wright – Wiltshire Council Cllr Darren Henry – Wiltshire Council Spencer Drinkwater – Wiltshire Council Transport Planning AMESBURY COMMUNITY AREA TRANSPORT GROUP ACTION NOTES 2. Notes of last meeting The notes of the last meeting held on 12th November 2018 were All agreed. accepted as a true record.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Sites of Astronomy and Archaeoastronomy in the Context of the UNESCO World Heritage Convention
    Heritage Sites of Astronomy and Archaeoastronomy in the context of the UNESCO World Heritage Convention Thematic Study, vol. 2 Clive Ruggles and Michel Cotte with contributions by Margaret Austin, Juan Belmonte, Nicolas Bourgeois, Amanda Chadburn, Danielle Fauque, Iván Ghezzi, Ian Glass, John Hearnshaw, Alison Loveridge, Cipriano Marín, Mikhail Marov, Harriet Nash, Malcolm Smith, Luís Tirapicos, Richard Wainscoat and Günther Wuchterl Edited by Clive Ruggles Published by Ocarina Books Ltd 27 Central Avenue, Bognor Regis, West Sussex, PO21 5HT, United Kingdom and International Council on Monuments and Sites Office: International Secretariat of ICOMOS, 49–51 rue de la Fédération, F–75015 Paris, France in conjunction with the International Astronomical Union IAU–UAI Secretariat, 98-bis Blvd Arago, F–75014 Paris, France Supported by Instituto de Investigaciones Arqueológicas (www.idarq.org), Peru MCC–Heritage, France Royal Astronomical Society, United Kingdom ISBN 978–0–9540867–6–3 (e-book) ISBN 978–2–918086–19–2 (e-book) © ICOMOS and the individual authors, 2017 All rights reserved A preliminary version of this publication was presented at a side-event during the 39th session of the UNESCO World Heritage Committee (39COM) in Bonn, Germany, in July 2015 Front cover photographs: Star-timing device at Al Fath, Oman. © Harriet Nash Pic du Midi Observatory, France. © Claude Etchelecou Chankillo, Peru. © Iván Ghezzi Starlight over the church of the Good Shepherd, Tekapo, New Zealand. © Fraser Gunn Table of contents Preface ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A303 Stonehenge Public Consultation Response 200418
    SOUTH WEST OFFICE Direct Dial: 0117 975 0699 A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down team [email protected] Date: 20 April 2018 Our Ref: PL00326762 BY EMAIL ONLY Dear Sirs, RE: A303 Stonehenge ­ Amesbury to Berwick Down, response to public consultation on proposed route Role of Historic England We are the government's expert advisor on England’s heritage and we have a statutory role in the planning system. Central to our role is the advice we give to local planning authorities, government departments, developers and owners on development proposals affecting the historic environment. ‘Constructive Conservation’ expresses the role we play in promoting a positive and collaborative approach to conservation that focuses on actively managing change. The aim is to accommodate the changes necessary to ensure the continued use and enjoyment of heritage assets while recognising and reinforcing their historic significance. Our advice seeks to minimise the loss of significance to these assets. We also look for opportunities to enhance the historic environment. Part of our role involves advising the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DDCMS) on matters relating to World Heritage, as DDCMS act as the State Party responsible for fulfilling the government’s responsibilities as a signatory to the 1972 World Heritage Convention. In this capacity we have taken part in the 2015 and 2017 advisory missions where the UNESCO World Heritage Centre and their advisory body ICOMOS International (not to be confused with ICOMOS­UK) were invited by DDCMS to visit the Stonehenge WHS and consider the evolving scheme proposals. In formulating this response we have taken into account the reports of both advisory missions and the decision of the 2017 World Heritage Committee which was informed by the 2015 and 2017 mission reports.
    [Show full text]
  • The Land's End Trail Tavistock to Avebury.Pub
    The Land's End Trail Part II – Tavistock to Avebury CONTENTS Land’s End Trail Part II Tavistock to Avebury 191 or 192 miles Page 1 Introduction Page 2 Route notes, glossary of terms and abbreviations, map information Page 3 Stage 14 Dartmoor Fringe I Tavistock to Lydford 10 miles Page 4 Stage 15 Dartmoor Fringe II Lydford to Belstone 13 miles Page 5 Stage 14/15 High Dartmoor Stage Tavistock to Belstone over the Moor 22 miles Page 6 Stage 16 Taw Stage Belstone to Sampford Courtenay 8 miles Page 7 Stage 17 Tarka Stage Sampford Courtenay to Chulmleigh 15 miles Page 8 Stage 18 Nympton Stage Chulmleigh to South Molton 11.5 miles Page 9 Stage 19 Exmoor Stage South Molton to Dulverton 19 miles Page 10 Stage 20 Haddon Hill Stage Dulverton to Wiveliscombe 13.5 miles Page 11 Stage 21 Taunton Deane Stage Wiveliscombe to Bishops Lydeard 7 miles Page 12 Stage 22 Quantock Hills Stage Bishops Lydeard to Bridgwater 13 miles Page 13 Stage 23 Sedgemoor Stage Bridgwater to Glastonbury 17 miles Page 14 Stage 24 Pennard Hill Stage Glastonbury to Bruton 16 miles Page 15 Stage 25 Longleat Stage Bruton to Warminster 17.5 miles Page 16 Stage 26 White Horse Stage Warminster to Market Lavington 17.5 miles Page 17 Stage 27 Pewsey Vale Stage Market Lavington to Avebury 15 miles NOTE: 1. Stages 14 & 15 and 14/15 offer alternative easy and hard routes across Dartmoor 2. Mileages after South Molton may be subject to amendment INTRODUCTION to the complete Land’s End Trail This long distance path makes its way up the central spine of Cornwall, Devon and Somerset and on to Avebury .
    [Show full text]
  • Addendum Addressing 'New Discovery'
    A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down TR010025 Additional submission Heritage Impact Assessment – Addendum addressing ‘new discovery’ responding to Secretary of State letter dated 16 July 2020 APFP Regulation 5(2)(q) Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Examination Procedure) Rules 2010 August 2020 Table of contents Chapter Pages Executive Summary 5 1 Introduction 6 2 Heritage Impact Assessment method 8 2.1 Data sources 8 2.2 Published works 8 2.3 Scope of assessment 9 2.4 Evaluation of heritage resource 11 2.5 Assessment of scale of specific impact and change 14 2.6 Evaluation of overall impact 14 2.7 Matters considered in this HIA Addendum 15 2.8 Natural and cultural features 15 2.9 Referencing of heritage assets 17 3 Assessment assumptions and limitations 9 4 Baseline information: the Durrington Walls discovery 19 4.1 WHS history and description 19 4.2 Description of new discovery associated with Durrington Walls Henge 19 4.3 Assessment of significance of Durrington Walls discovery 23 4.4 The Durrington Walls discovery and WHS inscription criteria 40 5 Other large pit-like geophysical anomalies in the landscape 43 5.1 Discrete and isolated heritage assets including pits 43 5.2 Description of other large pit-like geophysical anomalies in the landscape 43 5.3 Assessment of significance of other large pit-like anomalies in the landscape 48 6 Mitigation 54 7 Impacts of A303 Scheme 56 8 Impact assessment on the Attributes which convey the OUV of the WHS, Integrity and Authenticity 57 9 Conclusions 59 10 References 60 Figures 66 Abbreviations List 67 Glossary 69 Page 2 of 71 A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down| HE551506-AMW-EHR-SW_GN_000_Z-RP-LH-6000499 Table of Tables Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • West Lavington Neighbourhood Plan - Referendum Version (Final Plan) West Lavington Neighbourhood Plan 2017-2026
    Lavington Council West Lavington Parish West Neighbourhood Our Place: Our Plan Our Place: Our Plan Panell Littleton and Lavington West for A Plan 2017-2026 Referendum Version April 2019 West Lavington Neighbourhood Plan - Referendum Version (Final Plan) West Lavington Neighbourhood Plan 2017-2026 Our Place: Our Plan A Plan for West Lavington and Littleton Panell Referendum Version – April 2019 The West Lavington Neighbourhood Plan produced in accordance with the Neighbourhood Planning Regulations 2012 The Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group on behalf of West Lavington Parish Council: Councillor Sandra Gamble (Chair) Nick Barnes Councillor Steve Coxhead Liz Evans Councillor Julia Ford Eileen Hinton Councillor Michael May Su Newson Mike Page Paul Rayner Councillor Richard Scott The Parish Council received professional planning support from NEIGHBOURHOOD-PLAN.CO.UK during the production of this Neighbourhood Plan. NEIGHBOURHOOD-PLAN.CO.UK For any query relating to the Neighbourhood Plan contact: Kaye Elston – Clerk to the Council Tel - 07782 251464 Email: [email protected] www.westlavington.org.uk/planning/neighbourhood-plan.php Our Place: Our Plan – A Plan for West Lavington and Littleton Panell 2 West Lavington Neighbourhood Plan - Referendum Version (Final Plan) West Lavington Neighbourhood Plan 2017-2026 The Neighbourhood Plan (Incorporating Policies Map) Supporting Documents SEA & HRA Basic Designated Consultation Screening Evidence Base Conditions Area Plan Statement Request Statement Settlement SEA Screening HRA Screening Housing
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge World Heritage Site Management
    Stonehenge World Heritage Site Management Plan 2009 2.4 The “core zone” of the 2000 Name of World Heritage Site – Part of Site C373, Management Plan Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites 2.4.1 Much of the 2000 Plan was predicated on the idea of Date of Inscription onto World Heritage List – 1986, management zones including a‘core zone’ around on the nomination of the UK Government Stonehenge itself. The terms ‘core area’ or ‘core zone’ were used inter-changeably throughout the Plan to The Stonehenge WHS and its boundary refer to the central part of the WHS which is reasonably well-defined visually by the immediate See Map 1 – The Stonehenge World ridgelines and horizons that surround Stonehenge, Heritage Site particularly in the east, along King Barrow Ridge and to the south, where Normanton Down Ridge forms 3.1.1 To the north, the WHS boundary is drawn along the the boundary. Other attempts have been made to road known as The Packway, between Rollestone define this geographical area, including an attempt by Camp and the A345 roundabout; to the east, largely Cleal et al in their 1995 monograph on Stonehenge; along the west bank of the River Avon and along the “Stonehenge Bowl” set out in Appendix C of the Countess Road; and to the south along field 2000 Management Plan; and the “MILS” area (the boundaries past Rox Hill to the A360 road. The Monument’s Immediate Landscape Setting – the western boundary is formed by the A360 and monument in question is Stonehenge itself) as defined B3086 roads.
    [Show full text]
  • West Lavington Neighbourhood Plan (Submission)
    Lavington Council West Lavington Parish West Neighbourhood Our Place: Our Plan Our Place: Our Plan Panell Littleton and Lavington West for A Plan 2017-2026 Submission Plan April 2018 West Lavington Neighbourhood Plan - Submission Plan West Lavington Neighbourhood Plan 2017-2026 Our Place: Our Plan A Plan for West Lavington and Littleton Panell Submission Plan – April 2018 Submission of the Neighbourhood Plan in accordance with Regulation 15 of Neighbourhood Planning Regulations 2012 The Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group on behalf of West Lavington Parish Council: Councillor Sandra Gamble (Chair) Nick Barnes Councillor Steve Coxhead Liz Evans Councillor Julia Ford Eileen Hinton Councillor Michael May Su Newson Mike Page Paul Rayner Councillor Richard Scott The Parish Council received professional planning support from NEIGHBOURHOOD-PLAN.CO.UK during the production of this Neighbourhood Plan. NEIGHBOURHOOD-PLAN.CO.UK For any query relating to the Neighbourhood Plan contact: Kaye Elston – Clerk to the Council Tel - 07782 251464 Email: [email protected] Our Place: Our Plan – A Plan for West Lavington and Littleton Panell 2 West Lavington Neighbourhood Plan - Submission Plan West Lavington Neighbourhood Plan 2017-2026 Documents Forming the Neighbourhood Plan The Neighbourhood Plan Supplementary Document - Neighbourhood Policies Map Housing Allocation Site Plan Development Brief Supporting Documents SEA & HRA Basic Designated Consultation Screening Evidence Base Conditions Area Plan Statement Request Statement Settlement SEA Screening
    [Show full text]
  • Fugglestone Red, Salisbury ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY
    Prepared by Pegasus Planning Group on behalf of Persimmon Homes | May 2012 | P.0747 Fugglestone Red, Salisbury ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY Pegasus Planning Group CONTENTS Introduction 4 Assessment Approach 5 Cumulative Effects 5 Application Site Description 7 Application Site 8 Proposed Development 8 Alternatives 13 Socio Economics 14 Ecology & Nature Conservation 14 Landscape & Visuals 18 Archaelogy & Cultural Heritage 22 Agricultural Circumstances 23 Transport & Access 25 Air Quality 27 Noise & Vibration 28 Hydrology, Drainage & Flood Risk 29 Ground Conditions 29 Conclusion 31 Pegasus Planning Group Ref: P.0747 Date: MAY 2012 COPYRIGHT: The contents of this document must not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part without the written consent of Pegasus Planning Group. FUGGLESTONE RED, SALISBURY INTRODUCTION Persimmon Homes Ltd (the “Applicant”) is seeking to While the second application considered is described as: obtain planning permission for a residential-led mixed “LAND NORT WEST OF THE AVENUE, SALISBURY” use development (the “Proposed Development”) at Fugglestone Red in Salisbury, Wiltshire. “PROPOSED NEW CEMETERY WITH VEHICULAR ACCESS FROM THE AVENUE” An Environmental Statement (ES) has been prepared in support of two planning applications submitted on The two sites cumulatively are hereafter referred to as adjacent sites. The first planning application considered is the Application Site and have been considered together described as “ for the purposes of the environmental assessment. The Application Site is situated within the administrative area “LAND TO THE NORTH WEST OF FUGGLESTONE RED of Wiltshire Council (WC). AND BEMERTON HEATH, SALISBURY” This document comprises a non-technical summary “PROPOSED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT COMPRISING (NTS) of the ES.
    [Show full text]
  • Packway Garage Larkhill, Wiltshire
    Packway Garage Larkhill, Wiltshire Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment Planning Ref: 17/09624/FUL Ref: 201550.01 February 2018 wessexarchaeology Document Information Document title Packway Garage, Larkhill, Wiltshire Document subtitle Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment Document reference 201550.1 Client name James Hay Pension Trustees Ltd Address C/O CBRE Toronto Square Toronto Street Leeds LS1 2HJ On behalf of Michael Ranger Site location The Old Service Station, The Packway, Durrington, Wiltshire, SP4 8PZ County Wiltshire National grid reference SU 14258 44075 Planning authority Wiltshire Council Planning reference 17/09624/FUL WA project code 201550 Document compiled by Johanna Greaves Contributions from Will Foster and Johanna Greaves Quality Assurance Issue and date Status Author Approved by 1 Draft JSG AHNB 2 Final JSG AHNB Packway Garage, Larkhill, Wiltshire Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment Contents Summary ........................................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................... iii 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................1 1.1 Project background .........................................................................................................1 1.2 The Site ...........................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]