DOCSLIB.ORG

Educational Attainment in the Borough PDF 1 MB

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Educational Attainment in the Borough PDF 1 MB SERVICES FOR SCHOOLS Report for Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council Scrutiny Committee January 2016 www.hants.gov.uk GCSE results 2015 – Basingstoke and Deane Context of Key Stage 4 pupils 2015 in Basingstoke and Deane within Hampshire: Cohort- 1851 Borough Hampshire Comments % % Cohort 14% - Largest number of pupils of any borough/district. 1% increase over 2014 Disadvantaged 21% 18% More disadvantaged students than Hampshire averages and greater than 2014 by 2% but less than less than Gosport and Havant and just below Rushmoor. BME 13% 9% Greater than Hampshire overall but less than Rushmoor. EAL 7% 4% Above all Hampshire districts with the exception of Rushmoor. SEN 16% 13% Slightly higher than a number of districts Boys/girls 53%/47% 52%/48% National school Borough school % of School deprivation rankings deprivation disadvantaged 2014-2015, from ranking within pupils within 32,482 schools 70 Hampshire 2015 cohort schools 20,885 28 23% Aldworth 24,309 32 11% Bishop Challoner 25,644 45 12% Brighton Hill 23,546 54 11% The Clere 22,595 35 19% Costello 21,930 31 27% Cranbourne 16,213 10 32% Everest 16,276 11 31% Fort Hill 27,743 62 11% The Hurst 27,630 61 11% Testbourne 18,130 17 37% The Vyne Basingstoke and Deane outcome data 2015 - January 2016 Jean Thorpe 2 Approximately 72% pupils in the district are educated in Basingstoke town. The 2014 and 2015 cohorts are shown in Table 1. The secondary sector is characterised by a high proportion of small schools with less than 700 students on roll; there is approximately 16% surplus capacity at secondary schools which creates some student turbulence. There is evidence of pupils leaving the Basingstoke town secondary system to be educated elsewhere, mainly Winchester and Alresford. The measure in schools of 5A*-C including English and mathematics has been the benchmark for entry to further education for some years. This, along with separate progress score for English and mathematics measured between pupils leaving the primary sector (KS2) and the secondary sector (KS4), is how schools have been evaluated. A change to this metric comes in summer 2016 when Progress 8 and Attainment 8 measures will be in place. This requires pupils and schools to be evaluated in a similar way but over eight subjects. The cohort sizes below represent a slight increase over that of 2014 with 1560 more students on roll. Table 1: Borough cohort sizes Cohort: number of Cohort: number of Basingstoke and Deane secondary school pupils 2015 (KS4) pupils 2014 (KS4) Aldworth School 195 125 Bishop Challoner Catholic Secondary School 139 129 Brighton Hill Community School 193 222 The Clere School 120 114 The Costello School 222 220 Cranbourne Business and Enterprise College 130 117 Everest Community Academy 140 142 Fort Hill Community School 140 138 The Hurst Community College 240 194 Testbourne Community School 150 155 The Vyne Community School 130 126 Basingstoke and Deane outcome data 2015 - January 2016 Jean Thorpe 3 Table 2: percentage of pupils achieving 5A*-C and 5A*-C including English and mathematics, across the borough, county and nationally 2006-2015 Percentage 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 of pupils achieving 5+A*-C GCSEs: England any 59.20% 62.00% 65.30% 69.80% 76.10% 79.50% 83.00% 82.90% 65.50% 66.50% subject Hampshire 61.60% 62.70% 67.20% 70.40% 74.70% 77.40% 78.60% 79.00% 67.60% 67.70% any subject Borough any 56.10% 57.60% 59.14% 60.68% 63.82% 69.00% 76.50% 76.50% 64.0% 61.20% subject England inc English + 45.80% 46.70% 47.60% 50.70% 55.20% 58.90% 58.80% 60.60% 56.60% 57.30% mathematics Hampshire inc English + 50.20% 51.30% 53.85% 55.40% 58.90% 60.80% 58.50% 60.00% 58.90% 59.70% mathematics Borough inc English + 44.94% 44.40% 45.07% 46.78% 48.77% 51.20% 55.20% 55.20% 55.80% 53.50% mathematics Chart 1: percentage of pupils achieving 5A*-C and 5A*-C including English and mathematics, across the borough, county and nationally 2006-2015 Basingstoke and Deane outcome data 2015 - January 2016 Jean Thorpe 4 Headlines by school 5+ A*-C (or equivalent) including English and mathematics (2015) (Table 3 and Charts 2a and b) The percentage of pupils in each school in the borough achieving 5+ A*-C including English and mathematics ranges from 73.4% (Bishop Challoner) to 38.6% (Fort Hill Community School) (Table 3). There are five borough schools above the England average (57.3%), Hampshire average (59.7%) and borough average (53.5%). These are Bishop Challoner (72%), Testbourne Community School (65%), The Costello School (60%), The Hurst (67%) and The Clere School (62%). In contrast with 2014 Brighton Hill Community School is now below that of England, and The Clere has risen above. There are six schools below the England, Hampshire and borough averages: The Vyne (43%), Aldworth, (49%), Fort Hill (39%), Brighton Hill (51%), Cranbourne (51%) and Everest (39%). In 2015 the gap between the highest and the lowest performing school is 35%, 6% closer than in 2014, and the smallest gap since 2009. In recent years the highest performing school has attainment levels in the high 70%s and the lowest attaining school usually around 35-39%, although the gap has fluctuated since 2010. A recent change to the profile is the dipping of the schools’ upper attainment results, rather than a drop of the lowest results affecting the breadth of the range. The most notable changes from 2013 to 2015 are: - Bishop Challoner and Testbourne have consistently had the highest results year on year (Charts 2 and b) although Testbourne’s results are their lowest since 2010. - Cranbourne`s performance has declined by 15 percentage points from 2013 and is now performing below national, county and borough averages. - Both The Clere School’s and The Hurst’s results have steadily increased overall, The Hurst having it strongest outcomes for some years. - The results for both Brighton Hill and Costello show considerable fluctuation with a return to their 2013 profiles. - The results at Aldworth have declined for a third year since strong results in 2012. - The Vyne dropped 10% from greatly improved outcomes in 2014, although broadly remains above all outcomes to 2011. - Attainment at Fort Hill reduced in 2012 from 56% to 42% and again in 2015 to 39%, remaining low and considerably below national and county averages for 4 years. - There has been a 6% increase in attainment for Everest Community Academy from 33% in 2014 to 39% in 2015 but it remains some way from its strongest outcomes of 2013. Fort Hill is the lowest performing school in 2015. Basingstoke and Deane outcome data 2015 - January 2016 Jean Thorpe 5 Table 3: percentage of pupils achieving 5A*-C including English and mathematics, across the borough, county and nationally 2006-2015, and at a school level % of pupils achieving 5+A*-C GCSE (and equivalent) including English and Basingstoke and mathematics GCSE Deane KS4 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 (DfE) England average 47.60% 50.70% 55.20% 58.90% 58.80% 60.60% 56.60% 57.30% (validated 2015) 53.85% 55.40% 58.90% 60.80% 58.50% 60.00% 58.90% 59.70% Hampshire average Basingstoke and 45.07% 46.78% 48.77% 51.20% 55.20% 55.20% 55.80% 53.50% Deane average Aldworth School 42% 39% 34% 54% 60% 56% 50% 48.7% 65% 72% 76% 77% 68% 78% 74% 73.4% Bishop Challoner 62% 59% 58% 60% 56% 50% 61% 51.3% Brighton Hill The Clere School 51% 53% 65% 52% 63% 61% 56% 61.7% The Costello School 48% 51% 64% 63% 72% 58% 65% 59.5% 47% 44% 62% 59% 43% 66% 57% 50.8% Cranbourne Fort Hill 38% 44% 50% 56% 42% 42% 43% 38.6% The Hurst 48% 53% 60% 52% 61% 57% 61% 66.7% Everest Academy 25% 30% 17% 40% 34% 53% 33% 39.3% Testbourne 53% 66% 61% 70% 76% 72% 68% 64.7% The Vyne 38% 36% 33% 34% 44% 35% 53% 43.1% Charts 2a and b: percentage of pupils achieving 5A*-C including English and mathematics, across the borough, county and nationally 2006-2015, and at a school level Basingstoke and Deane outcome data 2015 - January 2016 Jean Thorpe 6 Basingstoke and Deane outcome data 2015 - January 2016 Jean Thorpe 7 Headlines by school 5+ A*-C (or equivalent) any subject (2015) (Table 4) GCSE attainment levels for 5+ GCSEs in “any subject” are usually higher in all schools than for the measure including English and mathematics. In 2015 there was a slight increase in results in England from 65.8% to 66.5%, in Hampshire from 67.6% to 67.7% but not in Basingstoke and Deane borough overall, where outcomes fell 2.8% to 61.2% There is however little change in the relative position of each school which is similar to the ranking when English and mathematics are counted within the 5 GCSEs. Attainment levels in Basingstoke and Deane schools range from 73.4% (Bishop Challoner) to 38.6% (Fort Hill) (Chart 3) when including English and mathematics but from 77.7% to 45% when considering all subjects together (Table 4). National, county and borough averages increase by 8-9% without the inclusion of English and mathematics. There are several aspects about the impact of strength in English and mathematics in overall attainment to consider; if schools are able to ensure that strength in English and mathematics enables pupils to access wider curriculum subjects this is generally reflected in a differential no smaller than the national 8+%, with a lower attainment figure being at least in line with that nationally.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Secondarydata 2018 for Website.Xlsx
    Allocation of secondary school places for September 2018 Abbreviations used: PAN - Published Admission Number SEN - Special Educational Needs EHCP - Education, Health and Care Plan The table below shows the published admission number (PAN) for entry to Year 7 in September 2018 at each secondary school in Hampshire, the total number of applications received (first, second and third preference) and the number of places offered on the national notification date (1 March 2018). The 'Allocated' column refers to children who were unsuccessful in gaining a place at any of their preferred schools and were offered a place at the school by the local authority because it was their catchment school or nearest school with a place available. Hampshire County Council is the admission authority for all community secondary schools and a breakdown of the number of places offered, by admission criteria, is also provided for these schools. For oversubscribed schools, the distance of the last child offered a place (measured in miles as a straight line) is shown. Information about the breakdown of places at other schools (Academies, Foundation, Aided and Trust schools), should be obtained from the school directly. Each school’s admission policy sets out how places are allocated when they are more applications than places available. You can view the admission policy for any school by visiting their school details page at: www.hants.gov.uk/educationandlearning/findaschool. School DfE No. Total no. of applications PAN Total no. of offers Statement of SEN/ EHCP
    [Show full text]
  • The Costello School Crossborough Hill, London Road, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 4AL
    School report The Costello School Crossborough Hill, London Road, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 4AL Inspection dates 6–7 March 2018 Overall effectiveness Requires improvement Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a school that requires improvement Overall, pupils do not make the progress they Many parents and carers are not sure how well should. their children are doing. Teachers’ use of the system lacks precision. Disadvantaged pupils do not make strong progress. They lag behind their classmates. Teaching is inconsistent across the school. The differences between their performance and Many pupils are fortunate to have a good other pupils nationally are not diminishing experience. Other pupils are hampered by quickly. weaker teaching and make slower progress. The most able pupils, and those who join the Frequent changes in personnel over the past school with high levels of attainment, do not go three academic years have led to instability in on to excel consistently in their GCSE the school’s leadership. examinations. Some parents, and a few staff, who raised Results in English, at GCSE level in science, and legitimate and well-founded concerns were not for many pupils in humanities and languages listened to until the school’s decline was are strong. In other subjects they are not as evident in published information. good as they should be. The governing body has been through an A new system to measure pupils’ progress and unhelpful period of turbulence.
    [Show full text]
  • Here - Amazing! - Another Highlight Was Seeing Strictly Come Dancing Arrive at St
    St Mark’s CofE Primary School Danebury Road, Hatch Warren Basingstoke, RG22 4US (01256) 346 111 [email protected] Growing and Learning Together in God’s Love www.stmarksprimary.net News Update – Monday 24th June 2019 A message from Mr Applegate - A highlight of last week was attending the Year 6 Leavers’ Service at Winchester Cathedral. The pupils were so well behaved, and very much enjoyed the event. As well as thinking about finishing Year 6, the theme of “the importance of bees” was celebrated. The 3D artwork they created is shown here - amazing! - Another highlight was seeing Strictly Come Dancing arrive at St Mark’s. The afterschool club had a finale, hosted by the talented Mrs Bridle. The children did so well as they danced their hearts away to a packed hall. Well done . - Yet another highlight was seeing the Y5 children interact with, and sing to, the residents at Pemberley House. See the Y5 webpage for some ‘moving’ photos, as well as a video of their singing. I welled up as I saw the power of pupils positively impacting on the older generation – and vice-versa. What a school to be part of! And still much to come! Well done to…. Year R – Beatrice, Elijah, Summer Year 1 – Archie, Henry, Finley, Toby Lunchtime Supervisory Assistant Vacancy Year 2 – Bethany W, Daniel, Noah W We are looking for a friendly, reliable and enthusiastic Year 3 – Bella, Samuel W, Ollie B person to join our lunchtime team. Year 4 – Leah, Sophie W, Oliver C Hours of work are 11.45am – 1.30pm Monday to Year 5 - All of Year 5! Friday.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Your School
    URN DFE School Name Does your Does your Is your Number school school meet our school our attainment eligible? Ever6FSM criteria? 137377 8734603 Abbey College, Ramsey Ncriteria? N N 137083 3835400 Abbey Grange Church of England Academy N N N 131969 8654000 Abbeyfield School N N N 138858 9284069 Abbeyfield School N Y Y 139067 8034113 Abbeywood Community School N Y Y 124449 8604500 Abbot Beyne School N Y Y 102449 3125409 Abbotsfield School N Y Y 136663 3115401 Abbs Cross Academy and Arts College N N N 135582 8946906 Abraham Darby Academy Y Y Y 137210 3594001 Abraham Guest Academy N Y Y 105560 3524271 Abraham Moss Community School Y Y Y 135622 3946905 Academy 360 Y Y Y 139290 8884140 Academy@Worden N Y Y 135649 8886905 Accrington Academy N Y Y 137421 8884630 Accrington St Christopher's Church of England High School N N N 111751 8064136 Acklam Grange School A Specialist Technology College for Maths and Computing N Y Y 100053 2024285 Acland Burghley School Y Y Y 138758 9265405 Acle Academy N N Y 101932 3074035 Acton High School Y Y Y 137446 8945400 Adams' Grammar School N N N 100748 2094600 Addey and Stanhope School Y Y Y 139074 3064042 Addington High School Y Y Y 117512 9194029 Adeyfield School N Y Y 140697 8514320 Admiral Lord Nelson School N N N 136613 3844026 Airedale Academy N Y Y 121691 8154208 Aireville School N N Y 138544 8884403 Albany Academy N N N 137172 9374240 Alcester Academy N N N 136622 9375407 Alcester Grammar School N N N 124819 9354059 Alde Valley School N N Y 134283 3574006 Alder Community High School N Y Y 119722 8884030
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 8: Academy Trusts Consolidated Into SARA 2016 to 17
    Annex 8 – Academy Trusts consolidated into SARA 2016/17 Company Number Academy Trust Name 10817580 1Excellence Multi Academy Trust 7318714 Abbey Academies Trust 7740516 Abbey College, Ramsey 7705552 Abbey Multi Academy Trust 8484553 Abbots Hall Primary Academy 7931886 Abingdon Learning Trust 9912859 Abney Trust 7820566 Abraham Guest Academy Trust 6625091 Academies Enterprise Trust 8349962 Academies of Inspiration 8360915 Academy @ Worden 6269025 Academy 360 7846852 Academy Transformation Trust 7484308 Accord Multi Academy Trust 7728029 Accrington St Christopher's Church of England High School 8681270 Ace Learning 10038640 ACE Schools Multi Academy Trust 8158718 Acer Learning Trust 9591931 Acer Trust 7678864 Achievement Through Collaboration Trust 8169571 Acle Academy 8424090 Acocks Green Primary School 8418341 Acorn Academy Cornwall 7654902 Acorn Education Trust 9253218 Acorn Multi Academy Trust 8638158 Acorn Trust 8707909 Activate Learning Education Trust 7650619 Active Education Academy Trust 9308398 AD Astra Academy Trust 10270029 Ad Meliora Academy Trust 7928558 Advance Learning Partnership 8414933 Advance Trust 7337888 Advantage Schools 8614382 Adventure Learning Academy Trust Page | 1 of 85 8117759 Affinity Multi Academy Trust 4389132 AIM Academies Trust 8842629 Aim High Academy Trust 7556117 Airedale Academies Trust 8628019 Akaal Academy Trust Derby Limited 8334743 Akaal Education Trust 7681848 Alameda Middle School 7523557 Alban Academies Trust 7644208 Alban City Free School Ltd 8123168 Albany Learning Trust 7700251 Alcester Academy
    [Show full text]
  • Brighton Hill Community School Brighton Way, Basingstoke, RG22 4HS
    Brighton Hill Community School Brighton Way, Basingstoke, RG22 4HS Inspection dates 30 April–1 May 2013 Previous inspection: Inadequate 4 Overall effectiveness This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Requires improvement 3 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3 Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because New approaches to teaching and improving Students are not doing as well as they should students’ results and behaviour are not being in speaking, reading and writing. consistently applied by all staff. Some teachers do not mark students’ work Not enough teaching is good. The quality of often enough. They do not always check that teaching varies too much between subjects students are following their advice and and different groups of students do not improving their work. experience the same standard of teaching. There is still some disruption to learning when Students of average and below-average teaching does not stimulate and interest the ability and students known to be entitled to students. free school meals do not make the same progress as other students in the school. The school has the following strengths The headteacher, his senior team and board Students’ results in mathematics have members are energetic and show a strong improved since the previous inspection and determination and the capacity to improve now compare favourably with figures for the school. similar schools. Teachers’ work and students’ results are Behaviour has improved considerably since the checked thoroughly and often.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2014–15
    Annual Report 2014–15 Published February 2016 Challenge Partners is a national network of local school partnerships. Our mission is to enable every pupil to experience the combined wisdom of the education system. Contents The Partnership 4 Our Collective Aims 12 Our Activities 16 Finances 28 Looking Forward 31 List of Partner Schools 33 Message from the Chief Executive This year our fledgling organisation reached a number of milestones. The first and most significant was that we entered our fifth year. During that time we have learnt much about how to run a successful national network of local Hubs of schools with a common purpose of providing the best education possible for all our pupils, especially the most disadvantaged. Membership of the Network of Excellence reached over 300 schools. This increase came from some new Hubs and also the continual growth of our existing ones. The next milestone was our decision not to form a Challenge Partners MAT. This was made for two reasons. The considerable additional funding we would have had to provide to support its formation, and that our leadership team felt our role was to support those members who wished to form their own MATs and not to compete with them. There are now over 30 MATs in Challenge Partners, with more joining. Nearly a third of the schools are now in MATs and the numbers continue to increase significantly. This has caused us to focus on our core provision for our schools and that now includes the very popular weekly email and a national brokering service.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2016 Admissions Data - Year 7
    September 2016 admissions data - Year 7 Abbreviations used: PAN - Published Admission Number SEN - Special Educational Needs EHCP - Education, Health and Care Plan The table below shows the total number of on-time applications (first, second and third preferences) received for each school in the normal admission round for September 2016 and the number of places offered on the national notification date (1 March 2016). A breakdown of the places offered by admission criteria is also provided for all Hampshire community and voluntary controlled schools and any academies, foundation or aided schools using the same criteria. A copy of Hampshire County Council's admission criteria can be found at www.hants.gov.uk/admissions_policies_2016. Data for schools following a different set of criteria can be obtained from the school directly. The 'Allocated' column shows the number of children who were allocated a place at the school by the Local Authority because the parent was unsuccessful in gaining a place at any of their preferred schools and this was the catchment or nearest school with a place available. For oversubscribed schools, the last column shows the distance (measured as a straight line unless otherwise stated in the school's admission policy) of the last child offered a place within the criterion in which the school oversubscribed. Please note that patterns of applicant data may not be repeated in subsequent years. DfE NO. School Total applications 2016 PAN 2016 Total Offers 2016 SEN/ EHCP Looked after Medical Catchment sibling Other
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Outcomes for Disadvantaged Learners In
    Improving outcomes for disadvantaged learners 2017­18 www3.hants.gov.uk/educa!on/hias.htm www.rosendale.researchschool.org.uk Contents Improving outcomes for disadvantaged learners . .1 Case studies . .8 Aldworth School . .8 Cove School . .10 Crestwood Community School . .14 Crookhorn College . .20 Fernhill School . .23 The Henry Cort Community College . .25 Park Community School . .28 Portchester Community School . .31 Purbrook Park School . .33 Vyne Community School . .36 Warblington School . .38 Cherry picking or broad vistas . .41 Building blocks for excellence . .43 Improving outcomes for disadvantaged learners ■ Active ingredients This report considers the ac!ve ingredients for a successful strategy for tackling educa!onal disadvantage. This is drawn from Hampshire school visits, case studies and the external expert input given during the programme. It also draws on the wider research evidence on improving outcomes for disadvantaged learners. These ingredients are as follows: 1. Leadership, culture and values 2. High expecta!ons 3. Understanding barriers and targeted, evidence based ac!vi!es 4. Monitoring and evalua!on 5. Securing accountability ■ Principles There are some principles that underpin these ingredients. These are as follows: ● Disadvantaged pupils are able to access high quality teaching every day. They should have at least equitable access to high quality teaching compared with their more fortunate peers. The quality of teaching has a dispropor!onate impact on disadvantaged pupils. ● Teachers in classroom feel accountable for the achievement of disadvantaged pupils. Disadvantaged pupils should not be considered ‘someone else’s responsibility’. ● That schools focus on pupil need, not labels and assump!ons when designing their strategy. ● That being eligible for the Pupil Premium does not equate to low a"ainment or low ‘ability’.
    [Show full text]
  • Aldworth School £57,274.04 CAPITA EDUCATION RESOURCING
    £ Aldworth School £57,274.04 CAPITA EDUCATION RESOURCING £47,570.77 HAYS EDUCATION £390.00 Reed Education £1,897.59 SIMPLY SUPPLY LTD £1,270.08 Teaching Personnel Ltd £5,963.60 THE TEACHING SUPPLY AGENCY £182.00 Applemore College £17,658.66 ALDERWOOD EDUCATION LTD £3,490.96 CAPITA EDUCATION RESOURCING £630.00 Celsian Education £3,293.31 RANDSTAD EDUCATION LTD £4,480.00 SIMPLY SUPPLY LTD £1,723.00 SUPPLY DESK LTD £390.00 Teaching Personnel Ltd £1,271.39 TIMEPLAN EDUCATION GROUP LTD £2,380.00 Brighton Hill Community School £15,930.48 CAPITA EDUCATION RESOURCING £11,395.00 ENGAGE EDUCATION £150.00 ITN MARK EDUCATION £3,652.88 REED PAYROLL MANAGEMENT LTD £732.60 Brune Park Community School £196,871.68 ALDERWOOD EDUCATION LTD £4,103.03 BROOK STREET UK LTD £708.96 CAPITA RESOURCING LTD £93,305.84 Celsian Education £2,664.87 ITN MARK EDUCATION £15,744.36 NETWORK VENTURES LTD £16,509.80 OFFICE ANGELS £1,596.39 RANDSTAD EDUCATION LTD £450.00 Reed Education £3,610.00 REED SPECIALIST RECRUITMENT LTD £7,460.00 SUPPLY DESK LTD £31,734.50 Teaching Personnel Ltd £16,643.93 TIMEPLAN EDUCATION GROUP LTD £2,340.00 Calthorpe Park School £88,654.88 CAPITA EDUCATION RESOURCING -£180.00 Celsian Education £160.07 ENGAGE EDUCATION £43,571.00 IT Talent Solutions Ltd £15,750.00 ITN MARK EDUCATION £1,674.35 REED SPECIALIST RECRUITMENT LTD £8,291.35 SIMPLY SUPPLY LTD £410.00 SUPPLY DESK LTD £160.00 Teaching Personnel Ltd £18,818.11 Court Moor School £1,305.00 JJFOX LTD £1,305.00 Cove School £148,651.75 HAYS EDUCATION £13,200.00 JJFOX LTD £26,204.50 SUPPLY DESK LTD
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Responses to Our Consultation on Revised Assessment Arrangements for GCSE Computer Science
    Analysis of responses to our consultation on revised assessment arrangements for GCSE computer science January 2018 Ofqual/18/6338 Analysis of responses to our consultation on revised assessment arrangements for GCSE computer science Contents Executive summary ..................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 3 The consultation on revised assessment arrangements for GCSE computer science .................................................................................................................. 3 Who responded? ......................................................................................................... 4 Approach to analysis ................................................................................................... 5 Views expressed – consultation response outcomes................................................. 6 Appendix A: List of organisational consultation respondents ................................... 29 Ofqual 2018 1 Analysis of responses to our consultation on revised assessment arrangements for GCSE computer science Executive summary We have consulted on our proposal to revise the assessment arrangements for GCSE computer science. The consultation ran between 27 November and 22 December 2017. The consultation questions were available to complete online or download. A copy of the consultation is available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/consultation-assessment-
    [Show full text]
  • Education Indicators: 2022 Cycle
    Contextual Data Education Indicators: 2022 Cycle Schools are listed in alphabetical order. You can use CTRL + F/ Level 2: GCSE or equivalent level qualifications Command + F to search for Level 3: A Level or equivalent level qualifications your school or college. Notes: 1. The education indicators are based on a combination of three years' of school performance data, where available, and combined using z-score methodology. For further information on this please follow the link below. 2. 'Yes' in the Level 2 or Level 3 column means that a candidate from this school, studying at this level, meets the criteria for an education indicator. 3. 'No' in the Level 2 or Level 3 column means that a candidate from this school, studying at this level, does not meet the criteria for an education indicator. 4. 'N/A' indicates that there is no reliable data available for this school for this particular level of study. All independent schools are also flagged as N/A due to the lack of reliable data available. 5. Contextual data is only applicable for schools in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland meaning only schools from these countries will appear in this list. If your school does not appear please contact [email protected]. For full information on contextual data and how it is used please refer to our website www.manchester.ac.uk/contextualdata or contact [email protected]. Level 2 Education Level 3 Education School Name Address 1 Address 2 Post Code Indicator Indicator 16-19 Abingdon Wootton Road Abingdon-on-Thames
    [Show full text]