Scanned Using Book Scancenter 5033

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Scanned Using Book Scancenter 5033 V THE EARLY PERIOD OF THE JAPANESE INVASION 193M933 The Manchurian Incident and the Mongolian Response During the summer of 1931, a series of conflicts occurred between the Chinese and the Japanese military adventurers along the Korean border. Among these conflicts, the Wanbaoshan Incident was the most sinister; because of this incident, tension between the two countries greatly increased. These incidents were planned and instigated by the Japanese militarists to create a pretext for invasion. In the early morning of September 18, 1931, the Japanese army stationed at the Japanese Concession in the Shenyang (Mukden) area shelled the military base of Zhang Xueliang’s forces located at the Northern Camp and started the Manchurian Incident. At that very moment, Zhang, who was in Beiping, asked for instructions from Nanjing. The watchword of the KMT was “ nonresistance,” a policy that, it was thought, would earn China the support of world opinion and force the Japanese to back down through peace­ ful measures. Although the League of Nations in Geneva was sympathetic to China, such moral support could neither help the antiaggressive advocacy of certain Japanese politi­ cians nor halt the militarists’ adventures. The Japanese Guandong Army in Dalian and LUshun took advantage of the Chinese policy of nonresistance to swiftly occupy all of Manchuria, including the Jerim League, the Hulunbuir area, and the Yeke-Minggan Ban­ ner of eastern Inner Mongolia. During this time, the Soviet Union’s military was suffer­ ing from Stalin’s purges, and so could mobilize no real strength to halt Japanese expan­ sion. This incident had a great impact in Mongolia, China, and northeast Asia. It also changed Prince De’s fate and made him a notable figure in the history of twentieth- century Mongolia. Further, it marked the beginning of open Japanese intervention in Mongolian affairs. As for Prince De himself, this incident was a major turning point. It not only changed his philosophy of life, but also gradually led him away from an extreme conservative position toward all kinds of progressive liberal ideologies, and from a nar­ row-minded desire for rehabilitation of Mongolian feudalistic institutions to the goals of Mongolian national survival and independence. The Japanese occupation of Mukden unexpectedly deprived many Mongols of their political bases. Merse’s Normal Academy of the Northeast Mongolian Banners was affected first, and it disintegrated. As for Merse himself, because of his earlier involve­ ment with the Comintern and the Inner Mongolian People’s Revolutionary Party, he felt deep antagonism toward Japan. Moreover, because of his socialistic inclinations, he left Mukden immediately after the fall of the city and returned to his homeland, Hulunbuir. Later, when Japanese forces invaded that area, he proceeded to Ulaanbaatar and disap­ peared. Some reports said that he was killed by Su Bingwen, a commander of the Chi- V: The Early Period of the Japanese Invasion 47 nese remnant forces, but there is no evidence to supportthis. Although the Normal Academy of the Northeast Mongolian Banners existed for only two years, many students were influenced by Merse’s zeal for Mongolian recon­ struction and survival. Among them, a group of radicals deeply influenced by his leftist inclinations later joined the Communist International upon the recommendation of one Altanbagana, a Kharachin Mongol who was trained in Ulaanbaatar during the active pe­ riod of the Inner Mongolian People’s Revolutionary Party. These young radicals joined the Communist Party not necessarily because of their devotion to the philosophy of Marx and Lenin, but rather to fulfill their own strong nationalistic aspirations. Their goal was to unite Inner and Outer Mongolia and to establish an independent country for all Mon­ gols. During the Japanese occupation, most of the students of this academy left Mukden, returned to their homes, and waited for their chance to struggle for the survival of their own people. The Mongol princes and nobles were, of course, also disturbed. Among them. Prince Namjilsereng of the Darkhan Banner (formally known as the Khorchin Left Cen­ tral Banner), then the deputy head of the Jerim League, fled to Beiping, along with his family. Wubao, the newly appointed jasag of Bingtu Banner (formally known as the Khorchin Left Front Banner), also soon fled to Beiping. The goal of this man, an oppor­ tunist, was perhaps to show his loyalty to the Chinese government merely to assure his own personal political advantage in the future. The great majority of the ruling nobles simply waited anxiously for the dust to settle. By this time, the Japanese militarists had already brought the former Manchu emperor, Puyi, from Tianjin to Dalian and prepared to use him as a political puppet to appease the people of the Japanese-occupied regions. Some Mongol nobles who had re­ ceived their ranks and titles from the former dynasty began to relax and look forward to an imperial restoration and the renewal of all their feudalistic privileges. Some even hoped a second Qing Dynasty would be established. The leaders of this group were Chimedsampil, the head of the Jerim League; Yeshikhaishun, the Tushiyetu prince of the Khorchin Right Central Banner; and Guifii and his son, Lingsheng, of the Hulunbuir area. The liaison officer between the Japanese Guandong Army and the Mongols was Jitsuzo Kikutake, a special agent of the Southern Manchurian Railway Company. The Japanese occupation of Manchuria spawned two political rumors: one raised hopes forthe restoration of the Manchu’s Qing Dynasty; the other looked forward to establishment of a Manchu-Mongol country. The Mongols responded differently to these two rumors. The former won the support of the nobles; the latter particularly ap­ pealed to the intellectuals and commoners. It soon became apparent, however, that these rumors were in fact groundless. First, it would have been extremely difficult to effect a complete restoration of the Qing Dynasty because too many things had changed since the abdication of the last Manchu emperor twenty years earlier. Second, after the death of Prince Gungsangnorbu in the spring of 1930, Inner Mongolia lost its common leader, a man who had high prestige and enjoyed personal contacts with many Japanese leaders. Many Mongols who were antagonistic toward Chinese cultivation of herding lands would have been glad to see the Japanese push the Chinese settlers out from their former grazing fields. That was the attitude of many Mongols in the realms under Japan­ ese occupation. But the response from the western limer Mongolian leaders was different from that in the east. They maintained a wait-and-see attitude and had no desire for the Japanese to intervene further in their own areas. Most of the conservative ruling nobles 48 The Last Mongol Prince were more pro-Chinese than pro-Manchu, and feared Japanese aggression. The intellec­ tuals, liberal or radical, were mostly influenced by their Chinese educations and were basically anti-Japanese. As for the two leagues of Josotu and Juu Uda, although the Japa­ nese had not yet invaded their territory, it was clear that their central locations made in­ vasion inevitable, and their leaders could do nothing but wait and prepare for the change to come. Moreover, because of their close relationship with the Nanjing government, they were more disillusionedthan most. A group of eastern Mongolian intellectuals tried to use the Manchurian Incident to create a movement to establish an independent Mongolian state. They organized their own military forces and attacked and occupied such cities in Mongolian territory as Taonan and Bayantala (Tongliao), that were still occupied by remnant Chinese forces. At first, the Japanese tolerated their activities; but as this manifestation of Mongolian na­ tionalism peaked, Japan decided to establish its puppet state, Manchukuo (“The Manchu Country”), and brought the movement to a halt by threatening to kill its leaders. Under such circumstances, the nationalists disbanded their forces “ of their own accord.” The most influential initiators of this movement were Jirgalang, a Dahur Mongol intellectual educated in Japan; Khafungga, an intellectual from the Bingtu Banner and a former stu­ dent of Merse at the Normal Academy of the Northeast Mongolian Banners and Ashkan, an intellectual from the Darkhan Banner, educated in the Mongolian-Tibetan Academy in Beiping. In order to pacify these intellectuals, the Japanese offered them official posts in the Manchukuo government. But their desire for Mongolian self-determination did not waver. Afterward, when Prince De initiated the Inner Mongolian Autonomy Movement, many young men came to join him from areas of Japanese occupation. Their dissatisfac­ tion with Japanese policy toward the Mongols in Manchukuo was one of the main rea­ sons for their defections. Jirgalang was one of these young men. The Changing Situation in Nanjing and Manchuria Japan’s invasion had tremendous political impact on the Chinese government. China’s policy of nonresistance was seriously criticized by the great majority of the Chi­ nese people and created many political problems. In the spring of 1932, after a long per­ iod of consultation between different groups in the KMT, Chiang Kai-shek decided to step down from his administrative position and assume the position of chairman of the military committee in order to manage the national defense against Japan and the pacifi­ cation of the Chinese Communists. Chiang had his long-time political opponent Wang Jingwei take over the Executive Yuan, the central organ of national administration. The KMT soon reshuffled the government to encourage unity among national minorities and convened the Conference on National Calamities at Luoyang in April 1932. Prince De, Wu Heling, and a dozen of the Mongol leaders were invited to attend the conference. Some Tibetans were also invited, among whom were two leading figures with intimate connections with Mongolia: the Panchen Lama and the Janggiya Khutugtu.
Recommended publications
  • The Chinese Civil War (1927–37 and 1946–49)
    13 CIVIL WAR CASE STUDY 2: THE CHINESE CIVIL WAR (1927–37 AND 1946–49) As you read this chapter you need to focus on the following essay questions: • Analyze the causes of the Chinese Civil War. • To what extent was the communist victory in China due to the use of guerrilla warfare? • In what ways was the Chinese Civil War a revolutionary war? For the first half of the 20th century, China faced political chaos. Following a revolution in 1911, which overthrew the Manchu dynasty, the new Republic failed to take hold and China continued to be exploited by foreign powers, lacking any strong central government. The Chinese Civil War was an attempt by two ideologically opposed forces – the nationalists and the communists – to see who would ultimately be able to restore order and regain central control over China. The struggle between these two forces, which officially started in 1927, was interrupted by the outbreak of the Sino-Japanese war in 1937, but started again in 1946 once the war with Japan was over. The results of this war were to have a major effect not just on China itself, but also on the international stage. Mao Zedong, the communist Timeline of events – 1911–27 victor of the Chinese Civil War. 1911 Double Tenth Revolution and establishment of the Chinese Republic 1912 Dr Sun Yixian becomes Provisional President of the Republic. Guomindang (GMD) formed and wins majority in parliament. Sun resigns and Yuan Shikai declared provisional president 1915 Japan’s Twenty-One Demands. Yuan attempts to become Emperor 1916 Yuan dies/warlord era begins 1917 Sun attempts to set up republic in Guangzhou.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Notes Introduction 1. Hobsbawm 1990, 66. 2. Diamond 1998, 322–33. 3. Fairbank 1992, 44–45. 4. Fei Xiaotong 1989, 1–2. 5. Diamond 1998, 323, original emphasis. 6. Crossley 1999; Di Cosmo 1998; Purdue 2005a; Lavely and Wong 1998, 717. 7. Richards 2003, 112–47; Lattimore 1937; Pan Chia-lin and Taeuber 1952. 8. My usage of the term “geo-body” follows Thongchai 1994. 9. B. Anderson 1991, 86. 10. Purdue 2001, 304. 11. Dreyer 2006, 279–80; Fei Xiaotong 1981, 23–25. 12. Jiang Ping 1994, 16. 13. Morris-Suzuki 1998, 4; Duara 2003; Handler 1988, 6–9. 14. Duara 1995; Duara 2003. 15. Turner 1962, 3. 16. Adelman and Aron 1999, 816. 17. M. Anderson 1996, 4, Anderson’s italics. 18. Fitzgerald 1996a: 136. 19. Ibid., 107. 20. Tsu Jing 2005. 21. R. Wong 2006, 95. 22. Chatterjee (1986) was the first to theorize colonial nationalism as a “derivative discourse” of Western Orientalism. 23. Gladney 1994, 92–95; Harrell 1995a; Schein 2000. 24. Fei Xiaotong 1989, 1. 25. Cohen 1991, 114–25; Schwarcz 1986; Tu Wei-ming 1994. 26. Harrison 2000, 240–43, 83–85; Harrison 2001. 27. Harrison 2000, 83–85; Cohen 1991, 126. 186 • Notes 28. Duara 2003, 9–40. 29. See, for example, Lattimore 1940 and 1962; Forbes 1986; Goldstein 1989; Benson 1990; Lipman 1998; Millward 1998; Purdue 2005a; Mitter 2000; Atwood 2002; Tighe 2005; Reardon-Anderson 2005; Giersch 2006; Crossley, Siu, and Sutton 2006; Gladney 1991, 1994, and 1996; Harrell 1995a and 2001; Brown 1996 and 2004; Cheung Siu-woo 1995 and 2003; Schein 2000; Kulp 2000; Bulag 2002 and 2006; Rossabi 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • National Party and Local Politics in Ordos, Inner Mongolia (1926-1935) Christopher P
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Department of East Asian Languages and School of Arts and Sciences Civilizations 1992 National Party and Local Politics in Ordos, Inner Mongolia (1926-1935) Christopher P. Atwood University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/ealc Part of the East Asian Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Atwood, Christopher P., "National Party and Local Politics in Ordos, Inner Mongolia (1926-1935)" (1992). Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations. 22. https://repository.upenn.edu/ealc/22 At the time of publication, author Christopher P. Atwood was affiliated with Indiana University. Currently, he is a faculty member in the East Asian Languages and Civilizations Department at the University of Pennsylvania. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/ealc/22 For more information, please contact [email protected]. National Party and Local Politics in Ordos, Inner Mongolia (1926-1935) Disciplines Arts and Humanities | East Asian Languages and Societies Comments At the time of publication, author Christopher P. Atwood was affiliated with Indiana University. Currently, he is a faculty member in the East Asian Languages and Civilizations Department at the University of Pennsylvania. This journal article is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/ealc/22 CHRISTOPHER ATWOOD (Bloomington) NATIONAL PARTY AND LOCAL POLITICS IN ORDOS, INNER MONGOLIA (1926-1935) At the beginning of spring 1929, a lama was cremated in Üüshin banner, on the Ordos plateau. After the fire burned out the attend- ants gathered the remnants of his bones and, mixing these sacred rel- ics with earth, interred them in a small pagoda designed to hold the remnants of holy men* An unridden horse was released on the steppe for the liberation of the lama's soul, while the living monks held serv- ices in the temple.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Oral History Collections at Columbia: Toward Better Access1
    Journal of East Asian Libraries, No. 140, Oct. 2006 CHINESE ORAL HISTORY COLLECTIONS AT COLUMBIA: TOWARD BETTER ACCESS1 Chengzhi Wang Columbia University Introduction Source materials keep their scholarly value unabated with the passage of time. This is true of the Chinese Oral History collections at Columbia. Most of the collections were created, acquired in association with the Chinese Oral History Project undertaken about three decades ago, but they are still frequently inquired about and consulted by students and scholars researching modern China. All the original Chinese oral history collections are kept at the Rare Book and Manuscript Library (RBML) at Columbia. Some difficulties in accessing the collections from afar and at Columbia have been reported by new users. Among other problems, new users assume that records for these Chinese-language oral histories have been completely entered into CLIO (Columbia Libraries Information Online), Columbia’s online catalog, and converted to LC pinyin system, and so are searchable in CLIO, but in fact this is not true. Many authors and titles of the oral histories, if known, are not directly searchable. Some general titles of oral history projects are searchable, and the search results offer substantial useful information in great detail. Yet, few users would search CLIO using the correct general titles, and some specific personal papers and archives cannot be located this way.2 Moreover, it seems the Journal of East Asian Libraries and other library professional periodicals have not carried any articles focusing on this important oral history collection.3 The Chinese Oral History project at Columbia officially started in 1958 and ended in 1980.
    [Show full text]
  • Battles of the Great Wall by Ah Xiang
    Battles of the Great Wall by Ah Xiang Excerpts from “Resistance Wars: 1931-1945” at http://www.republicanchina.org/war.html For updates and related articles, check http://www.republicanchina.org/RepublicanChina-pdf.htm Japanese Invasion of Jehol Shortly after the Shanghai Ceasefire Agreement, Japan’s militarists staged a coup d’état on May 15th, 1932, and killed their dove-faction prime minister. Declaring the inseparable relationship between Jehol [Rehe] and Manchuria in “Manchukuo independence proclamation” in Feb 1932, Japanese Kwantung Army commander took the coup as a green light for encroaching onto Jehol. Initially, Japanese intended to pacify Jehol by converting the provincial chair Tang Yulin. Having failed to buy over Tang Yulin, Japan resorted to military attacks by moving the bulk of its Kwantung Army towards Jehol border. In Jehol, Zhang Xueliang, as chairman of the Peiping branch of the KMT Military Committee, had deployed four infantry brigades and three cavalry brigades, about 17,000 troops, in Chaoyang, Kailu, Lingyuan, Chifeng and Chengde. Beginning from Oct, Zhang Xueliang, under the support of Premier TV Soong of the Administrative House, began to build two fortified defense lines inside of Jehol. Japan, citing the 1901 boxer protocol, had stationed about 200 garrison force in both Shanhaiguan Pass and Qinghuangdao. For distracting Chinese forces, Japan orchestrated two provocations at the Pass of Sea and Mountain in Oct and December of 1932. On the night of Jan 1st, 1933, Japan’s Shanghaiguan garrison commander made up an incident by exploding grenades and firing a few shots, and then demanded with Chinese for pulling out troops.
    [Show full text]
  • Threading on Thin Ice: Resistance and Conciliation in the Jade Marshal’S Nationalism, 1919-1939
    THREADING ON THIN ICE: RESISTANCE AND CONCILIATION IN THE JADE MARSHAL’S NATIONALISM, 1919-1939 Mengchuan Lin A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History (Modern China). Chapel Hill 2013 Approved by: Michael Tsin Miles Fletcher Klaus Larres ©2013 Mengchuan Lin ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii Abstract Mengchuan Lin: Threading On Thin Ice: Resistance and Conciliation in the Jade Marshal’s Nationalism, 1919-1939 (Under the direction of Michael Tsin) The 1920s marked a decade in the history of modern China which is typically referred to as the period of warlords. This period was characterised by political chaos, internal division and internecine warfare between various cliques of military strongmen who controlled China’s numerous provinces. These de facto military dictators of China, known as warlords in historical literature, were customarily construed to be avaricious and self-serving despots who ruled their large territories with little regard for the welfare of their subjects or that of the Chinese nation. My thesis aims to revise these previously held assumptions concerning the historical agency of Chinese warlords by investigating the unusual conduct of a particularly influential warlord: Wu Peifu. Wu’s display of deeply seated nationalistic tendencies throughout his political career, I argue, complicates our understanding of the impact that Chinese warlords exerted on the rise of Chinese national
    [Show full text]
  • Final Program of CCC2020
    第三十九届中国控制会议 The 39th Chinese Control Conference 程序册 Final Program 主办单位 中国自动化学会控制理论专业委员会 中国自动化学会 中国系统工程学会 承办单位 东北大学 CCC2020 Sponsoring Organizations Technical Committee on Control Theory, Chinese Association of Automation Chinese Association of Automation Systems Engineering Society of China Northeastern University, China 2020 年 7 月 27-29 日,中国·沈阳 July 27-29, 2020, Shenyang, China Proceedings of CCC2020 IEEE Catalog Number: CFP2040A -USB ISBN: 978-988-15639-9-6 CCC2020 Copyright and Reprint Permission: This material is permitted for personal use. For any other copying, reprint, republication or redistribution permission, please contact TCCT Secretariat, No. 55 Zhongguancun East Road, Beijing 100190, P. R. China. All rights reserved. Copyright@2020 by TCCT. 目录 (Contents) 目录 (Contents) ................................................................................................................................................... i 欢迎辞 (Welcome Address) ................................................................................................................................1 组织机构 (Conference Committees) ...................................................................................................................4 重要信息 (Important Information) ....................................................................................................................11 口头报告与张贴报告要求 (Instruction for Oral and Poster Presentations) .....................................................12 大会报告 (Plenary Lectures).............................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • East Asian Science, Technology, and Medicine (EASTM - Universität Tübingen)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by East Asian Science, Technology, and Medicine (EASTM - Universität Tübingen) EASTM 42 (2015): 39-71 The Experience of Illness in Early Twentieth-century Rural Shanxi Henrietta Harrison [Henrietta Harrison is professor of modern Chinese studies at Oxford University. She received her doctorate from Oxford University in 1996 and subsequently taught at Leeds and Harvard universities. She works mainly on the history of central Shanxi and has published a biography of Liu Dapeng (The Man Awakened from Dreams: One Man’s Life in a North China Village 1857- 1942, 2005) as well as a history of a Catholic village in the same area (The Missionary’s Curse and Other Tales from a Chinese Catholic Village, 2013). Contact: [email protected]] * * * Abstract: This paper uses the diary and other records of Liu Dapeng 劉大鵬 (1857-1942), a Shanxi village resident, to examine how people in rural China experienced and understood illness at an important time of transition for medical systems in China. It explains how Liu understood the illnesses that afflicted himself and members of his family in terms of providence. The healing methods he used ranged through self-medication with folk remedies and modern patent medicines; remedies provided by families friends and neighbours (including acupuncture and prescriptions based on classical Chinese medicine); remedies provided by gods and shamans; and prescriptions provided by professional doctors of Chinese medicine, whom Liu deeply distrusted. It also examines the arrival of Western medicine in Shanxi and argues that while this existed it was incorporated into networks of medicine provided by family and friends, rather than functioning as a separate institutional system.
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned Using Book Scancenter 5033
    Ill DEMCHUGDONGROB’S EARLY CAREER 1919-1928 The Ruling Prince of His Own Banner After the old Prince Namjilwangchug died, there was not an actual ruling prince of the Sunid Right Banner for almost seventeen years. Therefore, Demchugdongrob’s assumption of power as jasag was a momentous and happy occasion for the whole ban­ ner. It also relieved, at least ostensibly, his “ official” mother (the Turned khatun, the first wife of his father) and the elderly officials of the banner of their heavy responsibilities.' During 1919, Prince De’s first year in charge of the banner administration, a group of Buriyad Mongolian intellectuals initiated the Pan-Mongolian movement, and in late February convened a meeting of delegates from Buriyad and Inner Mongolia at Dau- ria, in Siberia. They decided to organize a government for all Mongolia and sent repre­ sentatives to the Paris Peace Conference to strive for international recognition ofMon­ golia’s independence. Because it had already established its own government. Outer Mongolia rejected the invitation, but some Inner Mongols, especially the leaders of the Hulunbuir area in the far north of Inner Mongolia, were willing to Join, and the Naiji- Toyin Khutugtu of Hohhot Turned (Inner Mongolia) was recognized as their leader. Though this movement failed to achieve its goal of recognition at the Paris con­ ference, it influenced all of Mongolia. Even though the activities of Japanese militarists and the White Russian leader, Semenov, overshadowed this movement, it still helped to rouse a common Mongolian desire for unity and independence. Although Demchugdong- rob was not involved in these matters, he was inevitably influenced by them.
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned Using Book Scancenter 5033
    VII THE PERIOD OF THE MONGOLIAN POLITICAL COUNCIL APRIL 1934 - JANUARY 1936 Founding of the Council The approved Eight Articles on Mongolian Local Autonomy became the legal foundation for Mongolian self-rule that Mongolian leaders had desired for years. In ac­ cordance with these principles, both the Temporary Outline of the Organization of the Mongolian Local Autonomous Political Affairs Council and its main personnel were all announced. The hearts of both traditional and more modem-minded Mongol leaders were gladdened, and they also perceived this as an unprecedented event in the history of the Republic of China. Still, the Eight Articles also occasioned a counterattack from the frontier provinces. Fu Zuoyi and his clique tried hard to destroy this great accomplish­ ment. Because of this. Prince De and other leaders ofthe autonomy movement had no choice but to concentrate their attention and energy on dealing with the pressure from without. But they were unable to make progress solving internal problems and satisfying the desires of the Mongol people because of Japanese westward expansion and changes in China ’s domestic political scene. After the Mongolian delegates returned to Beile-yin sume and submitted their report, both Prince Yon and Prince De took up their positions on April 3, 1934 and then telegraphed the Chinese government that they would go ahead with ceremonies to mark the establishment of the Mongolian Political Council and the inauguration of its mem­ bers. Princes Yon and De invited General He Yingqin, the Superintendent of Mongolian Local Autonomy, to come and “supervise” the ceremony. On April 23, 1934 the Mongolian Political Council was founded and its mem­ bers were sworn in.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Contribution and Loss of China in the War of Resistance Against the Japanese Aggression Zhaozhen An*
    Review Article Global Media Journal 2018 Vol.16 No. ISSN 1550-7521 31:123 The Historical Contribution and Loss of China in the War of Resistance against the Japanese Aggression Zhaozhen An* Institute of Russian Studies, Heilongjiang Provincial Academy of Social Sciences, 501 Rd. Youyi, Harbin, 150018, PR China *Corresponding author: Zhaozhen An, Institute of Russian Studies, Heilongjiang Provincial Academy of Social Sciences, 501 Rd. Youyi, Harbin, 150018, PR China, Tel: 13936669450; E-mail: [email protected] Received date: Jul 09, 2018; Accepted date: Jul 24, 2018; Published date: Aug 4, 2018 Copyright: © 2018 An Z. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Citation: An Z. The Historical Contribution and Loss of China in the War of Resistance against the Japanese Aggression. Global Media Journal 2018, 16:31. the world war is generally said to have begun on 1 September 1939, the day of the invasion of Poland by Nazi Germany and Abstract the subsequent declarations of war on Germany by France and the United Kingdom. From late 1939 to early 1941, in a series The War of Chinese People's Resistance against Japanese of campaigns and treaties, Germany conquered or controlled Aggression is very important for the world; its much of continental Europe, and formed the Axis alliance with international contribution occupies an important place: Italy and Japan. The war continued primarily between the first, China violated the plan of the German and Japanese European Axis powers and the coalition of the United Kingdom fascists on the global strategy; secondly, the fearless and the British Commonwealth, with campaigns including the Chinese people created the condition and prerequisite for North Africa and East Africa campaigns, the aerial Battle of correcting the situation of World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Fortifications, Modern Firepower, and Warlord Politics a Study on the Siege of Xi'an and Its Historical Significance
    /Ancient Fortifications, Modern Firepower, and Warlord Politics A Study on the Siege of Xi'an and its Historical Significance by Kingsley Tsang |fJP=!(Zeng Qingzhang) B.A., The University of British Columbia, 2000 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Arts . in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of History) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA August 2 002 © Kingsley Tsang, 2002 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of History The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada Date August 28, 2002 Abstract The Warlord period (1916-28) is a much-neglected era in modern Chinese scholarship. Scholars tend to ignore it because the events were complicated and the warlords acted without an ideological commitment. They are seen as violent but unsophisticated thugs with minimum affects on the history of Chinese military. The Siege of Xi'an (April to November 1926) demonstrated the fallacy of this assumption and the uniqueness of the warlord military system. The warlords managed to fuse the Chinese and Western military experience in a hybrid warring style.
    [Show full text]