Poetry and Ritual

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Poetry and Ritual POETRY AND RITUAL By J. M. LEIGHTON B.A. (RAND), D. LITT ET PHIL. (UNISA), T.H.E.D. Inaugural lecture delivered on 4 March, 1970 on appointment to the Chair in the Department of English at the Rand Afrikaans University Publication series of the Rand Afrikaans University A 28 JOHANNESBURG 1970 The Publications of the Rand Afrikaans University are published in the following series: A: INAUGURAL ADDRESSES AND LECTURES, B: RESEARCH BY LECTURERS AND STUDENTS. Mr Rector and Vice-Chancellor . .. Ladies and gentlemen members of the Council . .. Ladies and gentlemen colleagues . The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and not necessarily Ladies and gentlemen students . those of the University Ladies and gentlemen who honour this occasion with your presence, I see it as my duty, in the Department of English at this university, not only to teach the English language, but also to try and indicate something of the culture that is, so to speak, built into both language and literature. A language is not only a medium of referential communication, but also a medium of cultural communication. In order to reveal this culture to my students, I use the technique of literary criticism of texts selected from the three major genres of poetry, drama, and the novel. I hope that by this means they will discover that although ideas and responses might vary from national group to national group, all humanity forms a whole greater than anyone of its parts; that although emphases might differ the same basic range of emotions, ideas, and moral values are common to all mankind; that no nation has a monopoly of truth and virtue, and in any nation will be found those whose unnecessary, false, hard-headed © RAND AFRIKAANS UNIVERSITY, 1970 prejudices prevent a free interplay of serious minds. - 73961 - In order to accomplish this aim, it is necessary to try and define, with precision, the fundamental features of the literary 3 writer, it is surely the duty of the reader to adjust his response discipline. Indeed, one might say that definition is one of the to that required by the particular form. essential disciplines of the academic process. Not that know­ The distinction I propose between prose and poetry, then, ledge changes, though it does that too, but each age brings into is not a distinction of technique or outer form, but an inherent, relationship new combinations of thought and feeling that need or aesthetic, distinction. The proposition I must defend is that to be described. It is my aim tonight to try and describe one great poetry is essentially the communication of experience in of the essential features of literary art - the place of ritual in which religious ritual is used to enhance symbolism, or interpret poetry. I hope also to show incidentally that ritual in poetry the significance of rites, whereas prose is the medium of commu­ is one of the remaining features that makes poetry uniquely nication of those matters that concern man in a terrestrial, non­ different from prose. religious, social context. Prose is the language of everyday In their standard work on the theory of literature, Wellek communication, of discourse and discussion, of reference and and Warren state that 'most modern literary theory would be controversy; poetry is the language of man in search of his inclined to scrap the prose-poetry distinction, and then to divide relationship not only with society, but also with the unknown, imaginative literature (Dichtung) into fiction (novel, short story, or imperfectly known, God; the language of vision and of ecstasy. epic), drama (whether in prose or verse), and poetry (centring It is on ritual in poetic expression that I shall now concentrate. on what corresponds to the ancient "lyric poetry").'l) That it * * * might or might not be advisable to scrap the distinction between Before I attempt a demonstration of this view of poetry, prose and poetry is, unfortunately, a matter that the two authors several questions, interrelated questions, must be answered. decline to discuss. Moreover, the fact that no comment is forth­ Most important, what is ritual; and then, how far are vision coming suggests at least a tacit acceptance that modern literary and ecstacy an essential ingredient of ritual; what is the signifi­ theory is justified, and it is precisely this tacit acceptance that cance of Christianity; and finally, in what way is the use of requires questioning. ritual an inherent element in the inner form of a poem - i.e. With the development of numerous variations of literary how does it influence poetic structure? styles, the older distinctions between prose and poetry have First then a definition of ritual - and this is given in the become increasingly unacceptable. The well-known controversy full knowledge that definitions please only the makers of the between Coleridge and Wordsworth in this respect was based definitions. Nevertheless it must be done, if only because those on structural or technical differences that were already clouded who remain in their shells are apt to see less than those who at the end of the eighteenth century. So many prose writers, endanger their necks by sticking them out: for example, deliberately use semi-regular rhythms for rhetorical Religious ritual is a prescribed ceremony, in which some effect, and so many poets reject all but the loosest rhythmic belief of central importance to man's consciousness of the structures, that distinction solely on these grounds is clearly relationship existing between himself and God is dramatically impossible. Metaphor, image, symbol, inversion, satire, irony, symbolized, with a view to establishing or confirming belief comedy, tragedy - name what technique or form you will, it by repetition. will be found to be common to both kinds of writing. Hence, in discussing Sir James Frazer's interpretation of the Yet there is a distinction, else why should one medium be golden bough episode in Virgil's Aeneid, Maud Bodkin says: be deliberately chosen for a particular purpose, and not another? . the blossoming branch offered to the dead as part of The distinction, I firmly believe, must be made, for the integration the ritual of interment, brings in symbol the power that of structure and content in a particular form is such that it re-awakens forest and garden, to keep watch beside the 2 requires a particular kind of reading and a particular kind of corpse or accompany the freed spirit. ) response. If the choice is deliberate, there must be a reader's And Jessie Weston, considering the same episode, further com­ response in view. And if a particular response is aimed at by a 2) Maud Bodkin. ArchetypalPatterns in Poetry, Vintage Books, New York, 1) Rene Wellek and Austin Warren. Theory ofLiterature, Peregrine Y 28, 1958, p. 126. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, 1966, p. 227. 5 4 ~~------._- ----­ ments on the religious significance, in saying: As if we were God's spies: and we'll wear out But in view of the use made of these (nature) cults as the In a wall'd prison packs and sects of great ones medium of imparting high spiritual teaching, a use which ... 5 That ebb and flow by the moon. ) can no longer be ignored or evaded, are we not ... justified precis~ly in asking if the true importance of the rites has as yet been The ecstatic happiness revealed in this poetic speech is recognized. 3 ) the result of the 'Dionysian union with a larger whole' of which Maud Bodkin speaks. A dramatic version of the ritual of co~­ Now clearly is it impossible for mankind to know God perfectly. trition, forgiveness, and reconciliation has bee!! ce!e?rated m This understanding, first-hand understanding that is, can only Lear's earlier meeting with his daughter, and hiS spmt has ac­ come through vision, or, to use the terms of my definition, cordingly been freed from the dema~ds of court l?omp, and 'consciousness of the cosmic relationship existing between (man) self-indulgence, so that he can now take upon (himself) the and God'. Maud Bodkin, with her psychological interest, mystery of things', and he and Cordelia can look back on the would say that such vision is an archetype of human experience, world of ambition and petty climbing that constitutes 'court and when it forces its way into the conscious mind it leads to news', as though they 'were God's spies'. ecstacy. His freedom moreover, is not only freedom from emotional Such ecstacy has a number of different effects: in the first and intellectual involvement in the petty affairs of terrestrial place, by means of the visionary awareness of a cosmic relation­ life but also freedom from the confines of the temporal and ship, the visionist is drawn away from the demands of the personal sp;tial. Time and space have no meaning in an infinite and will, and is able to see life and its patterns with something like eternal world, so that, despite their 'wall'd prison', they will objectivity. No longer are the private aspirations, desires, hopes outlast 'packs end sects of great ones/That ebb aI?-d flow. by of the individual of paramount importance, but he can, like the moon'. Perhaps it is not too far-fetched to see m the tidal Troilus in his seventh sphere, look down on the toil and sweat 'ebb and flow' of human affairs a subjection to physical forces of life, and laugh with the laughter of the gods. 'This felt release,' from which Lear at least, has been released, and this release says Maud Bodkin, 'and Dionysian union with a larger whole, has excited both 'ecstacy and the serene clarity of Appollonian would seem to constitute that element of religious mystery _ vision and meaning.
Recommended publications
  • Hero, Shadow and Trickster; Three Archetypes in the Kingkiller Chronicle
    Hero, Shadow and Trickster; Three Archetypes in The Kingkiller Chronicle Tapio Tikkanen Master’s Thesis English Philology Faculty of Humanities University of Oulu Autumn 2018 Table of contents 1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................1 2 The History of Archetypes.........................................................................................................2 2.1 Carl Jung and the Collective Unconscious...........................................................................2 2.2 James Frazer’s Anthropological Examinations....................................................................4 2.3 Maud Bodkin’s Application of Jungian Archetypes to Poetry..............................................6 2.4 Northrop Frye and the Archetypes of Literature.................................................................9 3 Outlining the Archetypes........................................................................................................11 3.1 The Hero.........................................................................................................................11 3.2 The Shadow....................................................................................................................14 3.3 The Trickster...................................................................................................................15 4 Archetypes and Fantasy...…………….........................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Archetypal Approach to Eliot's “The Waste Land”
    postscriptum: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Literary Studies, Vol: 1 (January 2016) Online; Peer-Reviewed; Open Access www.postscriptum.co.in Nandi, Rinku. “Archetypal Approach … ” pp. 57-66 Archetypal Approach to Eliot's “The Waste Land” Rinku Nandi Assistant Teacher (P.G.) of English, Baidyadanga Girls’ High School Abstract In literary criticism archetype denotes a primordial image. It is through primordial images that universal archetypes are experienced and the unconscious is revealed. In “The Waste Land” the central theme of sterility is expressed through the central myth of ‘death-rebirth archetype’ very minutely. Eliot uses the mythic mode with the archetypal approach in “The Waste Land”. This paper tries to capture this mythic sensibility, in its limited way, as expressed in “The Waste Land”. Keywords death, rebirth, sterility 58 Nandi Archetypal criticism is a branch of literary criticism which investigates and studies repetitive narrative structures, character types, themes, motifs and images that according to Carl Jung are universally shared by people of all cultures. These repetitive patterns are a result of universal forms on structures in the human psyche, which when presented well in literature immediately draw a strong response from the reader as he / she shares the archetypes expressed by the author. The anthropological origins of archetypal criticism can pre-date its psychoanalytic origins by over thirty years. The Scottish anthropologist, James G. Frazer, made significant contribution to this field when his work The Golden Bough (1890-1915) was published. He studied the elemental patterns of myth and ritual that recur in diverse cultures and religions. Frazer argues that the death-rebirth myth is present in almost all cultural mythologies and is acted out in terms of growing seasons and vegetation.
    [Show full text]
  • William Blake, Northrop Frye, and Archetypal Criticism Mark Ryan University of Nottingham
    Fearful Symmetries: William Blake, Northrop Frye, and Archetypal Criticism Mark Ryan University of Nottingham orthrop frye’s wide-ranging analysis of William Blake’s art Nin Fearful Symmetry and in other criticism has long been appropriated by Blake scholars in their support of the archetypal tradition, with its emphasis on the meaning and sources of symbolism in the works of Blake. Such criticism has been viewed as standing in opposition to the historical research of David Erdman and others, whose view of Blake’s poetry and art results from a close inspection of the life and times of the artist. However, Frye’s contribution in this field has endured due to his insistence on relat- ing Blake’s ideas to other traditions of literary and religious thought and his ability to analyze Blake’s symbols and their interconnections. Frye’s study of Blake has had enormously important repercussions for literary critical studies, as it helped to form the basis of his own system of critical theory in the Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays (1957). In the Anatomy, Frye provides an analysis of four different types of literary expression, the third of which is the archetypal. In this article, it is my intention to partially explore the archetypal tradition of criticism, to which Frye is a prominent contributor, and to highlight the ways in which Frye’s analysis of archetypal symbolism in Blake created a new direction in literary criticism. The first section will give a brief synopsis of typical literature from the archetypal ESC 37.2 (June 2011): 173–183 critical tradition and explain Frye’s position within the field in relation to his use of Jung’s theories and study of Blake.
    [Show full text]
  • ROBSON, Arthur George, 1939- ASPECTS of the HERODOTEAN CONTEXT
    This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 67-6363 ROBSON, Arthur George, 1939- ASPECTS OF THE HERODOTEAN CONTEXT. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1966 Language and Literature, classical University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan ASPECTS OF THE HERODOTEAN CONTEXT DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Arthur George Robson, B.A., M.A. ******* The Ohio State University 1966 Approved by Department of Classics PREFACE This paper grew from one of much briefer compass on Herodotus* philosophy of history; prepared for a graduate seminar at the suggestion of the author but under the stimulation and inspiration of his dissertation adviser, Robert J. Lenardon. 1 can indirectly indicate the quality of guidance afforded me by saying that a lover of Thucydides inculcated a love of Herodotus. Whether such fair-mindedness and high-minded objectivity derives more from the example of Herodotus or of Thucydides is a moot point which the two of us resolve in quietly opposed ways. This continually growing interest then in why Herodotus wrote what he wrote in the way he did produced the present study. I do not of course presume to furnish the definitive answer to these questions. 1 have rather chosen simply to reflect upon important aspects of these topics in an organized fashion. The emphasis of my own studies has been literary and philosophical; and accordingly the present work represents this emphasis. From these two vantage ii points X have dealt more with Herodotus the historian than I have the history of Herodotus.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PROBLEM of SYMBOLISM H the ANCIENT J^Iarhers •'A
    The problem of symbolism in The Ancient Mariner; a review and analysis Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Keppler, Carl Francis, 1909- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 10/10/2021 19:54:30 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/319158 THE PROBLEM OF SYMBOLISM H THE ANCIENT j^IARHERs •' A REVIEW AM). MALISIS Gai°l PffEeppler : ' ' . : ■ :::'Kv:A:Wsls::; ' ' ' ‘ . ■ submitted to the faculty of the Department of English in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of "m a s t e r op arts in the Oradnate Golleges University of Arizona # .. TABU, OF CQimiTS Chapter - - Page I„ ^INTRODUCTQKI: THE SITUATION H D THE PROPOSAL. , . ./» . © 1 H o : THE NATURE O F SBffiOLISM. .-s,* ^ o . » .5 III. .EARLY WRITINGS ON THE PROBLEM: THE PERIOD OF NEGLECT ' : ' OR,EAST DISBESSAL (1798-1918) . ;o.^ . „ © 8 IV. RECENT WRITINGS OS THE PROBLEM; THE PERIOD OF INCREASING . INTEREST,AND INSIGHT (1919-I950). O' ... <, » 0 = 0 = . © 16. ,(a) The Personal-Biographical Studies o o e © 00© © o © , 17 (b) The Ideational-Biographical Studies o © o o o o © © 21 V. APPRAISAL AND ' ANALISIS . V . V' = • . v © 31 (a) Weaknesses.>00 © o o o © © o o o o o o © 0 0 © © e o © 31 (b) - Aohievesiehts © . © © . © « © © © © © © © ® © © © 41 (c) Directions© © © © © © © © © © '© © © © © © © © © © © © 44 Vl,' ' FUTURE "POSSIBILITIES © . © . © © v© © © . © © © © © © ©/ © : © ®> © 47 (a) Formulation of Method.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Archetypal elements in the poetry of Sylvia Plath. Soutter, Jennifer How to cite: Soutter, Jennifer (1989) Archetypal elements in the poetry of Sylvia Plath., Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/954/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk ARCHETYPAL ELEMENTS IN THE POETRY OF SYLVIA PLATH Jennifer Soutter Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1989 Abstract Jungian psychology underpins much of this thesis, specifically the central concept of that psychology, the process of individuation. Sylvia Plath's work and thought is responsive to Jungian analysis, and her poetry is examined within this framework, utilisation being made of her prose writings as additional evidence of that responsiveness. The hypothesis is that the process of individuation can be traced through the use of certain archetypal elements in her literary oeuvre, and that she used that oeuvre as a method of constructing her identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Mythological and Archetypal Approaches
    7 Mythological and Archetypal Approaches I. DEFINITIONS AND MISCONCEPTIONS In The Masks of God, Joseph Campbell recounts a curious phenomenon of animal behavior. Newly hatched chickens, bits of eggshells still clinging to their tails, will dart for cover when a hawk flies overhead; yet they remain unaffected by other birds. Furthermore, a wooden model of a hawk, drawn forward along a wire above their coop, will send them scurrying (if the model is pulled backward, however, there is no response). "Whence;' Campbell asks, "this abrupt seizure by an image to which there is no counterpart in the chicken's world? Living gulls and ducks, herons and pigeons, leave it cold; but the work of art strikes some very deep chord!" (31; our italics). Campbell's hinted analogy, though only roughly approximate, will serve none­ theless as an instructive introduction to the mythological approach to literature. For it is with the relationship of literary art to "some very deep chord" in human nature that mythological criticism deals. The myth critic is concerned to seek out those mysterious elements that inform certain literary works and that elicit, with almost uncanny force, dramatic and near-universal human reactions. The myth critic wishes to discover how certain works of literature, usually those that have becom~,_.Qr promise to become, "classics:' image a kind of reality to which readers respond-while other works, seemingly as well constructed, and even some forms of reality, leave them cold. Speaking figuratively, the myth critic studies in depth the "wooden hawks" of great literature: the so-called archetypes or archetypal pat- {terns that the writer has drawn forward along the tensed structural wires of his or "'her masterpiece and that vibrate in such a way that a sympathetic resonance is set " off deep within the reader.
    [Show full text]
  • Twentieth-Century Historical, Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives
    The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism VOLUME 9 Twentieth-Century Historical, Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008 The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism general editors Professor H. B. Nisbet University of Cambridge Professor Claude Rawson Yale University The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism will provide a com- prehensive historical account of Western literary criticism from class- ical antiquity to the present day, dealing with both literary theory and critical practice. The History is intended as an authoritative work of reference and exposition, but more than a mere chronicle of facts. While remaining broadly non-partisan it will, where ap- propriate, address controversial issues of current critical debate without evasion or false pretences of neutrality. Each volume is a self-contained unit designed to be used independently as well as in conjunction with the others in the series. Substantial bibliographical material in each volume will provide the foundation for further study of the subjects in question. volumes published Volume 1: Classical Criticism, edited by George A. Kennedy Volume 2: The Middle Ages, edited by Alastair Minnis and Ian Johnson Volume 3: The Renaissance, edited by Glyn Norton Volume 4: The Eighteenth Century, edited by H. B. Nisbet and Claude Rawson Volume 5: Romanticism, edited by Marshall Brown Volume 7: Modernism and the New Criticism, edited by A. Walton Litz, Louis Menand, and Lawrence Rainey Volume 8: From Formalism to
    [Show full text]
  • Intro and Course Overview Part a 1. Name the Two Main Characters in Plato's Ion? 2. Identify 3 Books on and About Archetypal Criticism
    Intro and course overview Part A 1. Name the two main characters in Plato's Ion? 2. Identify 3 books on and about archetypal criticism. Archetypal Patterns in Poetry, Maud Bodkin Poetics, Aristotle Anatomy of Criticis, Northrop Frye Principles of Literary Criticism, I.A Richards The Golden Bough, James George Frazer 3. Spot 2 writers of the aesthetic movement in Europe? 4. Who is the author of S/Z? Answer key 1. Socrates and Ion 2. Archetypal Patterns in Poetry, Maud Bodkin, Anatomy of Criticis, Northrop Frye and The Golden Bough, James George Frazer 3. Algernon Charles Swinburne, Oscar Wilde. 4. Roland Barthes Part B 1. From among the following recognize the definition of Dramatic irony. "A mode of dramatic or narrative writing in which author builds up artistic illusion, only to break it down by revealing that he, as artist, is the arbitrary creator and manipulator of his characters and their actions." "A reference to literary works in which God, or destiny, or the universal process, is represented as though deliberately manipulating events to frustrate and mock the protagonist." "A situation in a play or narrative in which the audience shares with the author knowledge of which a character is ignorant." 2. True or false a. The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe by C.S. Lewis is religious allegory with Aslan as Christ and Edmund as Judas. b. The 2008 Disney movie Wall-E is not an allegory to save earth. 3. Who among the following are the critics associated with the Frankfurt School? Karl Popper, Theodore Adorno, George Lukacs, Walter Benjamin, Jurgen Habermas 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Mythology in English Literature Harry Potter's Greek Connection
    25 Greek Mythology in English Literature Harry Potter’s Greek Connection A Study of the Influence of Greek Mythology in J K Rowling’s Harry Potter Series of Books Sugandha Indulkar Ancient Greeks were people of exceptional wisdom and foresight so much so that thousands of years later too, in an age of computers, mobile phones and space travel we can see the impact of their mythology on various phenomena from daily life. Their influence on fiction and creative writing seems to be endless. J K Rowling’s popular Harry Potter series of books draws immensely from ancient Greek mythology in characterisation, plot, theme, animals or imaginary creatures and various other aspects. This paper strives to trace as many parallels as possible in an attempt to decode the success value and appeal ancient Greek mythology holds for the present day reader. Myth and Mythology To begin with one needs to discuss what is myth and mythology. In classical Greek, ‘mythos’ signified any story or plot, whether true or invented. In its central modern significance however, a myth is one story in a mythology - a system of stories of ancient origin which aimed to determine why the world is as it is and things happen as they do, to provide a rationale for social customs and observances, and to establish sanctions for the rules by which people conduct their lives. Most myths are related to social rituals - set forms and procedures in sacred ceremonies but anthropologists disagree whether rituals generated myths or myths generated rituals. A number of modern writers have also asserted that an integrative mythology, whether inherited or invented, is essential to literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Reguirc1n0n·Cs Fo1· Tl1o De9rce L)·F ~1Aster of Fl·R~S 1N
    1\ [:0. _::.: 0••• 1 0 ('J.1', ·:-" J,l - .. .- -·.1__ ~·,_ '··'· ',.l ',·l,''•'., ·.·l·. •.·. '··. ,.J.l .;,!" - ~· .d._..,~ ~~ ~~J.. ..._l. .',-~- c1.., .l- .;:•,., .;1.,., --..1.- •.•I .') f ·:J.·· ·•...··• t .;.L \..·''I r•'~ ()'.. ~~.·i ·;-, -~~ c:._·,• reGuirc1n0n·cs fo1· tl1o de9rce l)·f ~1aster of fl·r~s 1n "E~ngJ.i:;h_ TABI.B OF CONTENTS J.v ABSTRACT ········~·d~·····6···-· ., 1. INTRODUCTION L HAWTHORNE'S NATURAL PR?OCCUPATION WITH FIR£~: AU'i'OBIOGP..APHICAL MUSXNGS _,' 2. HEARTH-fiRE IN THE SXETCHES AND TAUS COMPLEX IMAGES OF HEARTH-FIRE CONCWSJON 3. 11\'f.AGFS o.r.; !·H?L;. -FTRJ:. MYTHlC HELL- FI\~E THE 30NI'IRJ: AS A HELL-FIRE CON'CLU.SlDN 4. BI3LICA'~ I-JE.LL-Fl'W Al:D TEE IMAGL Cit' SATAN 4(i BE:~L··i--:Il:.:F i\.{f·r: SA'fAN AS i\N.Ai~OGI~~S OF EYJt · A STUlf( Cil-' T11/0 \.'iOF..KS . !>''·'-. t:k~Af]Vb ~X1·~~jLJ~S OF lHE HELl,-FI~I ~ '\, .• J..• SAT/\>;; i"\ S'i'UDI C:F THREE ·r.~\L.. [S ABSTRACT NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE'S JivL~GES OF FIRE: f,N ARCHETYPAL ANAL ..,{SIS OF SELECTET.l S!.CETC:Hl~S A.ND TALES by Doroth·! Sargent Ra11k:ir1 MasteY of A1·ts in Engli.sh May, 10?5 ti.0u t<.' :-!a,.vthOTT!\:;'s uniqt~e utJ.liz.:;.·~:.:tJn cf a-r·chctyp;~::-;~ espe·· J. v Irli.tlally, it seemed appropriate to recall, th·rot1gl1 fiaw·thorne 1 s autobiographical musings, hi.s personal fascina- tion with the phe11omenon of fire itself and to reveal 1~is awarer1ess of it as a source for crea·tivity.
    [Show full text]
  • William Blake, Northrop Frye, and Archetypal Criticism Mark Ryan University of Nottingham
    Fearful Symmetries: William Blake, Northrop Frye, and Archetypal Criticism Mark Ryan University of Nottingham orthrop frye’s wide-ranging analysis of William Blake’s art Nin Fearful Symmetry and in other criticism has long been appropriated by Blake scholars in their support of the archetypal tradition, with its emphasis on the meaning and sources of symbolism in the works of Blake. Such criticism has been viewed as standing in opposition to the historical research of David Erdman and others, whose view of Blake’s poetry and art results from a close inspection of the life and times of the artist. However, Frye’s contribution in this field has endured due to his insistence on relat- ing Blake’s ideas to other traditions of literary and religious thought and his ability to analyze Blake’s symbols and their interconnections. Frye’s study of Blake has had enormously important repercussions for literary critical studies, as it helped to form the basis of his own system of critical theory in the Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays (1957). In the Anatomy, Frye provides an analysis of four different types of literary expression, the third of which is the archetypal. In this article, it is my intention to partially explore the archetypal tradition of criticism, to which Frye is a prominent contributor, and to highlight the ways in which Frye’s analysis of archetypal symbolism in Blake created a new direction in literary criticism. The first section will give a brief synopsis of typical literature from the archetypal ESC 37.2 (June 2011): 173–183 critical tradition and explain Frye’s position within the field in relation to his use of Jung’s theories and study of Blake.
    [Show full text]