Voices of Miners Improving the Health and Safety of Miners in Eastern Ukraine VOICES of MINERS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Voices of Miners Improving the Health and Safety of Miners in Eastern Ukraine VOICES of MINERS VOICES OF MINERS IMPROVING THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF MINERS IN EASTERN UKRAINE VOICES OF MINERS IMPROVING THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF MINERS IN EASTERN UKRAINE Published by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Ukraine Kyiv, Ukraine, December 2012 © UNDP, 2012 — All rights reserved All rights reserved. The views expressed in this publication are the author’s and do not necessarily represent those of the United Nations, including UNDP or its Member States. The mention of specific companies does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by UNDP in preference to others of a similar nature. UNDP does not warrant that the information contained in this publication is complete and correct and shall not be liable for any damages incurred as a result of its use. United Nations Development Programme in Ukraine 1 Klovsky Uzviz Kyiv, 01021, Ukraine VOICES OF MINERS IMPROVING THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF MINERS IN EASTERN UKRAINE CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. MINERS PAVLO VRONSKYI ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 5 OLEKSII MALANIN. 11 OLENA PROKOPENKO . 13 OLEKSANDR PYSARENKO . 17 MYKOLA IVASHKO. 25 VASYL KHOLOD ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 32 VOLODYMYR PROKHOROV . 36 MARYNA OMELCHENKO. 44 3. WIVES OF MINERS ZOIA IVACHYKOVA. 49 OLEKSANDRA PODOLSKA . 56 LIUDMYLA KARHALEVA-TEMYR. 62 4. MEDICAL WORKERS SVITLANA SHMYHOVA ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 68 IRYNA VLASOVA ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 72 OLEH VATANSKY . 82 YEVHEN SKLIAR, SERHII DEMYDENKO AND OLEKSANDR SUKOLENOV . 90 MINERS 3 VOICES OF MINERS IMPROVING THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF MINERS IN EASTERN UKRAINE INTRODUCTION The “Voices of Miners” is a collection of interviews with miners, miners’ wives, and doctors regarding the health and safety of miners in Krasnodon, Rovenky and Sverdlovsk. This report is part of UNDP’s “Improving the Health and Safety of Miners in Eastern Ukraine” project, which aims to identify and address the health and safety needs of miners. These stories complement the facts and figures provided in a related yet separate “Assessment Report.” Over the past year, UNDP conducted dozens of interviews, focus groups, and community workshops to understand the health and safety needs of miners. UNDP also worked closely with DTEK Rovenkiantratsit, DTEK Sverdlovantratsit, and Metinvest’s Krasnodon Coal to examine the working conditions of miners. In total, UNDP engaged over 650 miners, miners’ spouses, health workers, and government officials to discuss the miners’ needs and priorities. The following interviews were conducted by Mr. Hryhorii Kalashnikov, President of Life Without Barriers and a lifelong resident of Sverdlovsk, under the guidance of UNDP. The reader should note that the names in these interviews have been changed at the request of the interviewees unless otherwise noted. UNDP translated the original interviews from Russian to Ukrainian and English. UNDP translated the interviews with the intent to preserve the spirit of the interviews, not to provide verbatim transcripts. 4 VOICES OF MINERS IMPROVING THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF MINERS IN EASTERN UKRAINE PAVLO VRONSKYI 38 YEARS OLD A STOPE MINER, INJURED AT WORK (The first and last names of the interviewee have been changed.) Please tell us about you and your family. Where are you from? How is your life going in this town? I’m a native of Sverdlovsk and come from a family of miners. Yet I was born in the Far East, where my father was serving in the military. In 1978, after graduating from the Institute of Mining and in accordance with a job placement process, my father moved the family to Sverdlovsk. My father worked at almost all of the mines of Sverdlovantratsit: as a heading driver, mine foreman and even site supervisor. Learning about the toils of miners’ work from my father’s experiences and not through hearsay, I didn’t plan to work in the mines after finishing secondary school. In the 1990s, miners were receiving wages with large delays, sometimes up to one year later. When wages were finally distributed, it was already not worth the same amount of money because of inflation. A MINERS 5 VOICES OF MINERS IMPROVING THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF MINERS IN EASTERN UKRAINE family couldn’t even prepare a “tormozok,” or bag lunch, as there just wasn’t enough money to buy it. Staple products such as lard, sausage, and meat were becoming very expensive. When you work underground, in conditions with insufficient air and intensive physical exertion, the human body experiences stress. That’s why calories are burned very quickly and a worker always feels hungry. And how efficient can you be in the mines when you are hungry? Knowing the situation at the mines, the youth was not eager to work there. The same was with me. I preferred private entrepreneurship. As the border with Russia was close and the prices of goods differed, I was buying goods in the Rostov region and selling them at the market in Sverdlovsk. In parallel, I entered Donbas State Technical University and specialised in “Industrial and Civil Construction.” I graduated in 2003 but never worked in construction. You can see, again, that I didn’t choose to become a miner. In 2004, I married, my wife and I were expecting a baby, and I had sort of come to my senses that family life was a big responsibility after all. By that time, my wife had been working for several years already at the mine, and I also decided to go to work at the mine. Having been trained in the training centre, I started working as a stope miner. The work was hard, but it paid well. Not all of the mines and teams can boast of good wages. I was lucky with that. When our daughter was born, we started thinking about our personal dwelling, as we were living with our parents before. We saved some money by ourselves, received some from our parents, and bought an apartment in the centre of town on the fourth floor. And everything would have gone well if not for a disastrous incident. In 2011, the roof collapsed at my place of work, and I was seriously injured. Everything happened instantaneously, during the second half of the work shift around 18:00. In such cases, it’s very hard to predict and avoid injuries. It’s next to impossible. It all depends how lucky you are. A small piece of rock can fall on you, just marring or scratching you, or it could be a lump of a rock, five-by-five metres. Because of very noisy machines, you cannot, for instance, hear the sounds to predict a fall. Workers signal each other with gestures, as it’s not worth yelling as nobody would be able to hear you. For several minutes, probably because of the shock of the pain, I was unconscious. At that time, I didn’t know how serious the injury was, and only now I can assess whether I was properly 6 VOICES OF MINERS IMPROVING THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF MINERS IN EASTERN UKRAINE evacuated from the mine to the hospital. It takes about one hour and a half to cover the distance from the closest first aid station of the mine to the place where I work. That’s why the workers of my team brought me to the grass: they used a wooden ladder in place of a stretcher. Then, a doctor and mine rescue brigade (MRB) employees arrived on the scene. As soon as I was in the first aid station, they put me on a hand frame. Soon after, they loaded me in the MRB car, which wasn’t suited to transport a person lying on a hand frame. Somehow they managed to put me on the floor between the seats. I was transported to a city hospital in this state. Each hill on the road caused intolerable pain all over my body. I found out later that it was a vertebral fracture and crushed bones. I was brought to the reception ward of the hospital. There we began a long procedure of registration and other formalities before making the first injection or diagnostic examination. The torments continued as I was shifted to a metallic rigid wheelbarrow and transported for an x-ray. When they were placing me on the x-ray table, I could not help but whimper with pain. Fortunately, the director of the mine came to the hospital and insisted on transporting me to the regional clinical hospital in the city of Luhansk. It was Friday, so local doctors would hardly do anything with me until Monday. And it would be useless anyway as they could not do any surgical operations on the spine. If during the first 12 hours after the accident, the spinal medulla is not freed from the compression of damaged spine fragments, the consequences would be irreversible. At about 22:30 I was put into a “GAZelle” type ambulance to be delivered to the Luhansk regional hospital. Again, the whole way, I suffered from the movement of ambulance’s suspension. The pain didn’t go away. In less than one hour after our arrival to the Luhansk hospital, I was lying on the surgical table. The surgery was to be done immediately. My wife had already arrived and was giving her written consent to the doctors to conduct the surgery. I cannot judge how successful the operation was, but the doctors did their best. The financial expenses of the treatment were covered by the administration of the mines and the Social Insurance Fund for Occupational Injuries. Everything that was necessary for my treatment was provided. In two months, I was discharged from the hospital home. I could only lie at that time, and there was no wheelchair yet. I received the wheelchair by the Social Insurance Fund nine months after the injury.
Recommended publications
  • Daily Report 112/2021 17 May 20211
    - 1 - 1 Daily Report 112/2021 17 May 20211 Summary In Donetsk region, between the evenings of 14 and 16 May, the SMM recorded 1,173 ceasefire violations, including 53 explosions. In the previous reporting period, it recorded 197 ceasefire violations in the region. In Luhansk region, between the evenings of 14 and 16 May, the Mission recorded 192 ceasefire violations, including 67 explosions. In the previous reporting period, it recorded 74 ceasefire violations in the region. A man was injured due to undetermined explosive objects in Dovhe and a girl was injured due to gunfire in Voznesenivka (formerly Chervonopartyzansk), Luhansk region. The SMM continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske. It recorded ceasefire violations inside the disengagement area near Petrivske and SMM unmanned-aerial vehicles spotted people inside the disengagement areas near Zolote and Petrivske. The Mission facilitated and monitored adherence to localized ceasefires to enable the operation of critical civilian infrastructure. The SMM continued following up on the situation of civilians, including at three entry-exit checkpoints and the corresponding checkpoints of the armed formations in Luhansk region. The Mission’s freedom of movement continued to be restricted.* 1 Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30, 16 May 2021. All times are in Eastern European Summer Time. - 2 - Ceasefire violations 2 Number of recorded ceasefire violations 3 Number of recorded explosions4 2 For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table. During the reporting period, the SMM cameras in Petrivske and in Stanytsia Luhanska were not operational.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee of Ministers Secretariat Du Comite Des Ministres
    SECRETARIAT GENERAL SECRETARIAT OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS SECRETARIAT DU COMITE DES MINISTRES Contact: Clare OVEY Tel: 03 88 41 36 45 Date: 12/01/2018 DH-DD(2018)32 Documents distributed at the request of a Representative shall be under the sole responsibility of the said Representative, without prejudice to the legal or political position of the Committee of Ministers. Meeting: 1310th meeting (March 2018) (DH) Item reference: Action plan (09/01/2018) Communication from Ukraine concerning the case of NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine (Application No. 54825/00) * * * * * * * * * * * Les documents distribués à la demande d’un/e Représentant/e le sont sous la seule responsabilité dudit/de ladite Représentant/e, sans préjuger de la position juridique ou politique du Comité des Ministres. Réunion : 1310e réunion (mars 2018) (DH) Référence du point : Plan d’action Communication de l’Ukraine concernant l’affaire NEVMERZHITSKY c. Ukraine (requête n° 54825/00) (anglais uniquement) DH-DD(2018)32 : Communication from Ukraine. Documents distributed at the request of a Representative shall be under the sole responsibility of the said Representative, without prejudice to the legal or political position of the Committee of Ministers. DGI 09 JAN. 2018 Annex to the letter of the Agent of Ukraine SERVICE DE L’EXECUTION before the European Court of Human Rights DES ARRETS DE LA CEDH of 05 January 2018 no. 190/5.2.1/ін-18 Updated Action plan on measures to be taken for implementation of the European Court’s judgments in the cases of Nevmerzhitsky group v. Ukraine (application no. 54825/00, judgment of 05/04/2005, final on 12/10/2005); Yakovenko group (Application No.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 258/2020 29 October 2020 1 Summary
    - 1 - Daily Report 258/2020 29 October 2020 1 Summary • The SMM recorded one ceasefire violation in Donetsk region and none in Luhansk region. In the previous reporting period, it recorded two ceasefire violations in Donetsk region and none in Luhansk region. • A man died due to the detonation of a hand grenade in Sievierodonetsk, Luhansk region. • The SMM continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske. During evening hours, an SMM long-range unmanned aerial vehicle spotted four people inside the disengagement area near Zolote. • The Mission facilitated and monitored adherence to localised ceasefires to enable repairs to and the operation of critical civilian infrastructure. • The SMM continued following up on the situation of civilians amid the COVID-19 pandemic, including at entry-exit checkpoint in Luhansk region and checkpoints of the armed formations in both Donetsk and Luhansk regions. • The Mission visited two border crossing points in non-government-controlled areas of Luhansk region. • The Mission’s freedom of movement continued to be restricted, including at border crossing points outside government control near Dovzhanske and Voznesenivka, Luhansk region (including at a railway station).* Ceasefire violations 2 Number of recorded ceasefire violations 3 Number of recorded explosions 4 1 Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30, 28 October 2020. All times are in Eastern European Time. 2 For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table. During the reporting period, the SMM cameras in Petrivske and Berezove were not operational. 3 Including explosions 4 Including from unidentified weapons - 2 - Map of recorded ceasefire violations - 3 - In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded one ceasefire violation, an undetermined explosion, while facilitating and monitoring adherence to a localised ceasefire in Betmanove (formerly Krasnyi Partyzan, non-government-controlled, 23km north-east of Donetsk).
    [Show full text]
  • Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 15 April 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY …………………………………………………. 3 I. INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………. 6 A. Context B. Universal and regional human rights instruments ratified by Ukraine C. UN human rights response D. Methodology III. UNDERLYING HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS ……………………… … 10 A. Corruption and violations of economic and social rights B. Lack of accountability for human rights violations and weak rule of law institutions IV. HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS RELATED TO THE MAIDAN PROTESTS ……………………………………………………… 13 A. Violations of the right to freedom of assembly B. Excessive use of force, killings, disappearances, torture and ill-treatment C. Accountability and national investigations V. CURRENT OVERALL HUMAN RIGHTS CHALLENGES ……………… 15 A. Protection of minority rights B. Freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and the right to information C. Incitement to hatred, discrimination or violence D. Lustration, judicial and security sector reforms VI. SPECIFIC HUMAN RIGHTS CHALLENGES IN CRIMEA …………….. 20 VII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ………………………….. 22 A. Conclusions B. Recommendations for immediate action C. Long-term recommendations Annex I: Concept Note for the deployment of the UN human rights monitoring mission in Ukraine 2 | P a g e I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. During March 2014 ASG Ivan Šimonović visited Ukraine twice, and travelled to Bakhchisaray, Kyiv, Kharkiv, Lviv, Sevastopol and Simferopol, where he met with national and local authorities, Ombudspersons, civil society and other representatives, and victims of alleged human rights abuses. This report is based on his findings, also drawing on the work of the newly established United Nations Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU).
    [Show full text]
  • Late T from the O C Pecial Monitoring Mi Ion to Ukraine ( MM
    12/2/2017 Latest from the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), based on information received as of 19:30, 2 December 2017 | OSCE Latet from the OC pecial Monitoring Miion to Ukraine (MM), aed on information received a of 19:30, 2 Decemer 2017 KYIV 2 December 2017 This report is for the media and the general public. The SMM recorded fewer ceasere violations in Donetsk region and more in Luhansk region compared with the previous reporting period. The Mission continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske; it observed calm situations in each. Its access remained restricted in the disengagement areas and elsewhere, including near Siedove and Samiilove.* It followed up on reports of shelling at a grain production facility in Yasynuvata. The Mission saw weapons in violation of withdrawal lines near Netailove. It observed Ukrainian Armed Forces positions in southern areas of Verkhnotoretske. In Luhansk city the SMM saw Russian Federation ags placed alongside “LPR” ags outside certain buildings. It facilitated and monitored repairs and maintenance of essential infrastructure in Vesela Hora. The SMM visited three border areas not under the control of the Government. In Donetsk region the SMM recorded fewer ceasere violations[1], including, however, more than 170 explosions, compared with the previous reporting period (about 100 explosions). While in government-controlled Svitlodarsk (57km north-east of Donetsk) on the evening of 30 November the SMM heard 80 undetermined explosions and small-arms and heavy- machine-gun re 3-5km south-east and 6-7km east and south. On 1 December, while at the same location, the SMM heard 33 undetermined explosions 4-7km south-east.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation in Ukraine
    COMMUNICATION SUBMITTED UNDER ARTICLE 15 OF THE ROME STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT SITUATION IN UKRAINE: WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY COMMITTED IN PRISONS SEIZED AND CONTROLLED BY ANTI-GOVERNMENT FORCES September 2020 TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS ATO Anti-Terrorist Operation CF Correctional Facility DPR Donetsk Peoples’ Republic ECHR European Convention on Human Rights ECtHR European Court of Human Rights FIDH International Federation for Human Rights IAC International Armed Conflict ICC International Criminal Court ICTY International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia KHPG Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group LPR Luhansk Peoples’ Republic NIAC Non-International Armed Conflict PTDC Pre Trial Detention Centre SBU Ukrainian State Security UAF Ukrainian Armed Forces The preparation and elaboration of this FIDH-KHPG Communication were made possible thanks to the support of the United Nations Development Programme in Ukraine, International Renaissance Foundation, the European Commission, Open Society Foundations, National Endowment for Democracy (United States), the Democracy Commission of the United States Embassy in Ukraine, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of FIDH and KHPG and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the aforementioned supporting institutions. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of abbreviations 2 I. Introduction 4 II. Executive Summary 6 III. Filing Parties 9 IV. Methodology 12 V. Factual Background 17 A. Outbreak of Armed Conflict in Eastern Ukraine 17 B. Ukrainian Prisons in Donetsk and Luhansk Provinces Prior 24 to the Outbreak of Armed Conflict C. Impact of the Outbreak of Armed Conflict on Prisoners in 24 Eastern Ukraine D.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 225/2020 21 September 2020 1 Summary
    - 1 - Daily Report 225/2020 21 September 2020 1 Summary • Between the evenings of 18 and 20 September, the SMM recorded no ceasefire violations in Donetsk region. In the previous reporting period, it recorded 12 ceasefire violations in the region. • Between the evenings of 18 and 20 September, the Mission recorded in total four ceasefire violations in Luhansk region. In the previous reporting period, it recorded no ceasefire violations in the region. • The Mission continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske. During evening and night hours, an SMM long-range unmanned aerial vehicle spotted people inside the latter two areas. • The SMM observed weapons in violation of withdrawal lines in non-government- controlled areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions, including 21 multiple launch rocket systems. • The Mission facilitated and monitored adherence to localised ceasefires to enable repairs to and the operation of critical civilian infrastructure. • The SMM continued following up on the situation of civilians amid the COVID-19 pandemic, including at an entry-exit checkpoint and the corresponding checkpoint of the armed formations in Luhansk region. • The Mission’s freedom of movement continued to be restricted, including at checkpoints of the armed formations near Staromykhailivka, Staromarivka, and Zaichenko, all in Donetsk region.* 1 Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30, 20 September 2020. All times are in Eastern European Summer Time. - 2 - Ceasefire violations 2 Number of recorded ceasefire violations 3 Number of recorded explosions 4 2 For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table. During the reporting period, the SMM cameras in Petrivske and near Shyrokyne were not operational.
    [Show full text]
  • Late T from the O C Pecial Monitoring Mi Ion to Ukraine (
    Latet from the OC pecial Monitoring Miion to Ukraine (MM), aed on information received a of 19:30, 17 Decemer 2018 KYIV 18 December 2018 This report is for the media and the general public. Summary Compared with the previous 24 hours, the SMM recorded more ceasere violations in Donetsk and Luhansk regions. The Mission observed weapons in violation of withdrawal lines on both sides of the contact line. The SMM facilitated and monitored adherence to the ceasere to enable repairs to essential civilian infrastructure as well as damaged houses in Marinka and Krasnohorivka. It continued to facilitate the operation of the Donetsk Filtration Station. Restrictions of the Mission’s access continued in all three disengagement areas. The SMM was also restricted at two weapons storage sites in non- government-controlled-areas of Donetsk region, as well as Novoamvrosiivske and Makiivka and close to Voznesenivka, a non- government-controlled area of Luhansk region near the border with the Russian Federation.* Ceasefire violations[1] In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded more ceasefire violations, including about 70 explosions, compared with the previous 24 hours (about 45 explosions). More than half of the ceasere violations were recorded in areas south-east of Svitlodarsk (government-controlled, 57km north-east of Donetsk). In Luhansk region, the SMM recorded more ceasere violations (of which more than half were recorded in the security zone), including about 200 explosions, compared with the previous 24 hours (85 explosions). More than half of the explosions were recorded in areas south of Syrotyne (government-controlled, 71km north-west of Luhansk) and south-east of Zolote-2/Karbonit (government-controlled, 62km west of Luhansk) (see the disengagement areas section below).
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 31/2021 9 February 2021 1
    - 1 - 1 Daily Report 31/2021 9 February 2021 1 Summary • The SMM recorded 42 ceasefire violations in Donetsk region. In the previous 24 hours, it recorded 106 ceasefire violations in the region. • The Mission recorded five ceasefire violations in Luhansk region. In the previous 24 hours, it recorded 15 ceasefire violations in the region. • The SMM saw fresh damage to a functioning school in Zolote-5/Mykhailivka, Luhansk region. • The Mission continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske, and again saw containers inside and near the southern edge of the area near Zolote. • The SMM spotted for the first time anti-tank mines near Zaitseve, Donetsk region. • The Mission facilitated and monitored adherence to localized ceasefires to enable operation and maintenance of critical civilian infrastructure and demining activities. • The SMM continued following up on the situation of civilians, including at four entry- exit checkpoints and five corresponding checkpoints of the armed formations in Donetsk and Luhansk regions. • The SMM’s freedom of movement continued to be restricted, including at a border crossing point near and a railway station in Voznesenivka (formerly Chervonopartyzansk), Luhansk region.* Ceasefire violations 2 Number of recorded ceasefire violations 3 Number of recorded explosions 4 1 Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30, 8 February 2021. All times are in Eastern European Time. 2 For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table. During the reporting period, the SMM camera in Petrivske was not operational. 3 Including explosions. 4 Including from unidentified weapons. - 2 - Map of recorded ceasefire violations - 3 - In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded 42 ceasefire violations, including seven undetermined explosions, the majority of which occurred during the day in areas south-east of Zalizne (formerly Artemove, government-controlled, 42km north-east of Donetsk) (see below).
    [Show full text]
  • Donbas in Flames
    GUIDE TO THE CONFLICT ZONE This publication is the result of work of a group of authors of various competencies: investigative journalism, politology, geography, and history. Written as a kind of vade mecum, this guidebook will familiarize the reader with the precursors, problems, terminology, and characteristics of the war in the Donbas. The book is targeted at experts, journalists, and representatives of international missions working in Ukraine. It will also interest a wide range of readers trying to understand and develop their own opinion on the situation in the east of Ukraine. The electronic version of this publication can be downloaded from https://prometheus.ngo/donbas-v-ogni Donbas In Flames УДК 908(477.61/.62-074)”2014/…”(036=111) Guide to the conflict zone ББК 26.89(4Укр55) Lviv, 2017 Д67 Editor: Alina Maiorova Authors: Mykola Balaban, Olga Volyanyuk, Christina Dobrovolska, Bohdan Balaban, Maksym Maiorov English translation: Artem Velychko, Christina Dobrovolska, Svitlana Kemblowski, Anna Shargorodskaya, Andrii Gryganskyi, Max Alginin Design: Lukyan Turetsky Activity supported by the Security Environment Canada Fund for Local Initiatives Research Center © 2017 “Prometheus” NGO Activité réalisée avec l’appui du Fonds canadien d'initiatives locales Content Foreword. When the truth is the best weapon 5 Chapter 1. Donbas - The panoramic picture 7 Donbas on the Map of Ukraine 7 As Seen by Analysts and Journalists 10 Donbas (Un)Known to the World 14 Chapter 2. Could the War be Avoided? 17 Ukrainian land 17 Rust Belt 20 Similar and different 22 Voting Rights 25 Unsolicited patronage 26 Chapter 3. Chronicles of War 31 End of February 2014 31 March 2014 32 April 2014 33 May 2014 36 June 2014 38 July 2014 39 August 2014 41 Beginning of September 2014 42 September 2014 - February 2015 42 From February 2015 to this day 44 Chapter 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Latest from the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), Based on Information Received As of 19:30, 10 June 2019
    • Compared with the previous 24 hours, the Mission recorded fewer ceasefire violations both in Donetsk and Luhansk regions. • The SMM observed damage from small-arms fire to civilian properties in Chermalyk. • It saw a weapon in violation in non-government-controlled Boikivske. • The Mission continued to observe long queues of civilians at checkpoints along the contact line. • The SMM facilitated and monitored adherence to the ceasefire to enable repairs to and the operation of critical civilian infrastructure on both sides of the contact line. • Restrictions of the SMM’s access continued in all three disengagement areas and elsewhere.* Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. DAILY REPORT Latest from the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), based on information received as of 19:30, 10 June 2019 This report is for the media and the general public. Summary • Compared with the previous 24 hours, the Mission recorded fewer ceasefire violations both in Donetsk and Luhansk regions. • The SMM observed damage from small-arms fire to civilian properties in Chermalyk. • It saw a weapon in violation in non-government-controlled Boikivske. • The Mission continued to observe long queues of civilians at checkpoints along the contact line. • The SMM facilitated and monitored adherence to the ceasefire to enable repairs to and the operation of critical civilian infrastructure on both sides of the contact line. • Restrictions of the SMM’s access continued in all three disengagement areas and elsewhere.* Ceasefire violations[1] In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded fewer ceasefire violations, including, however, the same number of explosions (about 100), compared with the previous 24 hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Late T from the O C Pecial Monitoring Mi Ion to Ukraine ( MM
    2/6/2018 Latest from the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), based on information received as of 19:30, 5 February 2018 | OSCE Latet from the OC pecial Monitoring Miion to Ukraine (MM), aed on information received a of 19:30, 5 Feruar 2018 KYIV 6 February 2018 This report is for the media and the general public. The SMM recorded fewer ceasere violations in Donetsk region compared with the previous 24 hours and no ceasere violations in Luhansk region. The Mission continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske; it recorded ceasere violations near the Petrivske disengagement area. The Mission’s access remained restricted in all three areas and elsewhere, including in Kreminets and Naberezhne.* The SMM observed weapons in violation of withdrawal lines near Sievierodonetsk and Khrustalnyi. The SMM continued to facilitate and monitor repair and maintenance works on essential civilian infrastructure near Shchastia, Artema, Kalynove, Mykhailivka-Almazna, and Slovianoserbsk. The Mission visited ve border areas not under government control. The SMM observed gatherings in Kharkiv and Odessa, and followed up on reports of an incident at the building where the Zakarpattia Hungarian Union is located in Uzhhorod. In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded fewer ceasere violations[1] including about 200 explosions compared with the previous 24 hours (290 explosions). During the day on 5 February, the SMM camera at the Donetsk Filtration Station (15km north of Donetsk) recorded ten projectiles in ight from west to east 0.5-1.5km south. During the day on 5 February, positioned at the railway station in Yasynuvata (non- government-controlled, 16km north-east of Donetsk) for over three hours, the SMM heard seven undetermined explosions and 18 bursts and shots of small-arms re, all 2-3km west and north-west.
    [Show full text]