DOCSLIB.ORG

Late T from the O C Pecial Monitoring Mi Ion to Ukraine (

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Late T from the O C Pecial Monitoring Mi Ion to Ukraine ( Latet from the OC pecial Monitoring Miion to Ukraine (MM), aed on information received a of 19:30, 17 Decemer 2018 KYIV 18 December 2018 This report is for the media and the general public. Summary Compared with the previous 24 hours, the SMM recorded more ceasere violations in Donetsk and Luhansk regions. The Mission observed weapons in violation of withdrawal lines on both sides of the contact line. The SMM facilitated and monitored adherence to the ceasere to enable repairs to essential civilian infrastructure as well as damaged houses in Marinka and Krasnohorivka. It continued to facilitate the operation of the Donetsk Filtration Station. Restrictions of the Mission’s access continued in all three disengagement areas. The SMM was also restricted at two weapons storage sites in non- government-controlled-areas of Donetsk region, as well as Novoamvrosiivske and Makiivka and close to Voznesenivka, a non- government-controlled area of Luhansk region near the border with the Russian Federation.* Ceasefire violations[1] In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded more ceasefire violations, including about 70 explosions, compared with the previous 24 hours (about 45 explosions). More than half of the ceasere violations were recorded in areas south-east of Svitlodarsk (government-controlled, 57km north-east of Donetsk). In Luhansk region, the SMM recorded more ceasere violations (of which more than half were recorded in the security zone), including about 200 explosions, compared with the previous 24 hours (85 explosions). More than half of the explosions were recorded in areas south of Syrotyne (government-controlled, 71km north-west of Luhansk) and south-east of Zolote-2/Karbonit (government-controlled, 62km west of Luhansk) (see the disengagement areas section below). About 190 ceasere violations, including about 130 explosions, were assessed as live-re training (outside the security zone). Disengagement areas[2] On the evening of 16 December, the SMM camera in Zolote (government-controlled, 60kmwest of Luhansk) recorded nine projectiles in ight from south-south-east to north-north-west at an assessed range of 1-3km east (unable to determine whether inside or outside the Zolote disengagement area). In the afternoon of 17 December, positioned in Zolote-2/Karbonit, the SMM heard about 30 undetermined explosions at an assessed range of 6-10km south-east (assessed as outside the disengagement area). Positioned inside the disengagement area near Stanytsia Luhanska, the SMM observed a calm situation.[3] Withdrawal of weapons The SMM continued to monitor the withdrawal of weapons in implementation of the Memorandum and the Package of Measures and its Addendum. In violation of the withdrawal lines Government-controlled areas 16 December An SMM long-range unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) spotted: 12 self-propelled howitzers (2S1 Gvozdika, 122mm) and two anti-tank guns (MT-12 Rapira, 100mm) at the railway station in Kostiantynivka (60km north of Donetsk); a surface-to-air missile system (9K35 Strela-10) near Hnutove (20km north- east of Mariupol); and a surface-to-air missile system (9K31 Strela-1) near Starohnativka (51km south of Donetsk). 17 December Ten self-propelled howitzers (seven 2S1 and three 2S3 Akatsiya, 152mm) at the railway station in Kostiantynivka; Two self-propelled howitzers (2S3) heading south-west on road H-20 near Kostiantynivka; Five towed howitzers (D-30 Lyagushka, 122mm) on a train near Bakhmut (formerly Artemivsk, 67km north of Donetsk); Three self-propelled howitzers (2S3) heading south on road H-20 near Romanivka (41km north of Donetsk) Non-government-controlled areas 16 December An SMM long-range UAV spotted: a tank (T-64) next to a residential house in Verkhnoshyrokivske (formerly Oktiabr, 29km north-east of Mariupol). An SMM mini-UAV spotted: four multiple launch rocket systems (MLRS) (BM-21 Grad, 122mm) near Sadovyi (57km south-west of Luhansk) (For previous observations in that area, see SMM Daily Report 1 August 2018 ) and an MLRS (BM-21) at a training area south-east of Miusynsk (62km south- west of Luhansk). Beyond the withdrawal lines but outside designated storage sites Government-controlled areas 16 December An SMM mini-UAV spotted: a self-propelled anti-aircraft system (2K22 Tunguska) at the railway station in Rubizhne (84km north-west of Luhansk). 17 December A surface-to-air missile system (9K33 Osa) in Kalchyk (24km north of Mariupol). Non-government-controlled areas 16 December An SMM mini-UAV spotted: ten self-propelled howitzers (2S1), six towed howitzer (D-30), four surface-to- air missile systems (9K35) and three tanks (T-64) at a training area south- east of Miusynsk. 17 December Three tanks (T-72) at a training area south-east of Ternove (57km east of Donetsk). Weapons that the SMM was unable to verify as withdrawn[4] Weapon storage site beyond the respective withdrawal lines in a government-controlled-area of Donetsk region* 17 December Two towed howitzers (D-30) remained missing. Indications of military and military-type presence in the security zone[5] Government-controlled areas 15 December An SMM mini-UAV spotted: two infantry ghting vehicles (IFV) (BMP-1) near Zolote-4/Rodina (59km west of Luhansk), about 100m north of the Zolote disengagement area. 16 December An SMM long-range (UAV) spotted: two armoured personnel carriers (APC) (one MT-LB and one BTR variant) near Novoselivka Druha (69km south of Donetsk); an APC (possible BTR) near Opytne (12km north-west of Donetsk); an APC (BTR-80) near Pyshchevyk (25km north-east of Mariupol); an anti-aircraft gun (ZU-23, 23mm) near Hnutove; an armoured recovery vehicle (BREM-2) near Hranitne (60km south of Donetsk); two IFVs (BMP variants) near Novohryhorivka (55km south of Donetsk); an APC (BTR variant) near Novotroitske (36km south-west of Donetsk); and two IFVs (BMP-1) near Nevelske (18km north-west of Donetsk). 17 December Two IFVs (BMP-1) near Zolote-4/Rodina; Three IFVs (BMP-1) near Zolote; Six IFVs (BMP-1) near Popasna (69km west of Luhansk); An APC (BTR-70) near Raihorodka (34km north-west of Luhansk); and An APC (BTR-70) in Avdiivka (17km north of Donetsk); and Non-government-controlled areas 16 December An SMM long-range UAV spotted: a probable IFV (BMP variant) in a residential area of Pikuzy (formerly Kominternove, 26km north-east of Mariupol); three IFVs (BMP-2) and two APCs (BTR-80 and MT-LB) in a residential area of Sosnivske (35km north-east of Mariupol); and two IFVs (BMP-2) near Dokuchaievsk (30km south-west of Donetsk). 17 December Four APCs (two MT-LB and two undetermined variants) and two IFVs (BMP variants) near Svobodne (73km south of Donetsk). Mine hazard signs The Mission observed several new wooden sticks on both sides of a 800m stretch of road C051132 near a cemetery in Taramchuk (government-controlled, 29km south- west of Donetsk), of which some had mine signs (red background with a skull and cross bones and “Stop, Mines” written in Ukrainian and “Danger, Mines” in English). (For previous observations in that area, see SMM Daily Report 30 November 2018) SMM facilitation of repairs to civilian infrastructure The SMM facilitated and monitored adherence to the ceasere to enable repair works to the Petrivske water pumping station near Artema (government-controlled, 26km north of Luhansk), to the Krasnohorivka gas distribution station between Marinka (government-controlled, 23km south-west of Donetsk) and Oleksandrivka (non- government-controlled, 20km south-west of Donetsk), to power lines near Troitske (government-controlled, 69km west of Luhansk), to damaged houses in Marinka and Krasnohorivka (government-controlled, 21km west of Donetsk) as well as to enable an assessment of a water pipeline near Popasna. It continued to facilitate the operation of the Donetsk Filtration Station (15km north of Donetsk). Border areas not under government control At a border crossing point near Voznesenivka (formerly Chervonopartyzansk, 65km south-east of Luhansk), the SMM saw 26 cars (seven with Ukrainian and 17 with Russian Federation licence plates, and two with “LPR” plates) and a bus with Russian Federation licence plates and about 20 people on board in a queue to exit Ukraine. About ten minutes after the SMM’s arrival, a member of the armed formations told the SMM to leave the area.* At the Chervona Mohyla railway station in Voznesenivka, the SMM saw about 100 stationary uncovered cargo wagons (unable to see whether empty or loaded) and 20 tank wagons parked on rails. After about ve minutes, a member of the armed formations told the SMM to leave the area.* While at a border crossing point near Marynivka (78km east of Donetsk) for about 60 minutes, the SMM saw 20 cars (four with Ukrainian and six with Russian Federation licence plates, and ten with “DPR” plates) and three pedestrians (two men in their thirties and one woman in her sixties) exiting Ukraine. The Mission also saw 11 cars (three with Ukrainian licence plates and eight with “DPR” plates) and three pedestrians (two women in their sixties and one man in his thirties) entering Ukraine. The SMM continued monitoring in Kherson, Odessa, Lviv, Kharkiv, Ivano-Frankivsk, Dnipro, Chernivtsi and Kyiv. *Restrictions of SMM’s freedom of movement or other impediments to fulfilment of its mandate The SMM’s monitoring and freedom of movement are restricted by security hazards and threats, including risks posed by mines, unexploded ordnance (UXO) and other impediments – which vary from day to day. The SMM’s mandate provides for safe and secure access throughout Ukraine. All signatories of the Package of Measures have agreed on the need for this safe and secure access, that restriction of the SMM’s freedom of movement constitutes a violation, and on the need for rapid response to these violations. They have also agreed that the Joint Centre for Control and Co-ordination (JCCC) should contribute to such response and co-ordinate mine clearance.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comparative Connections a Triannual E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations
    Comparative Connections A Triannual E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations China-Russia Relations: Navigating through the Ukraine Storm Yu Bin Wittenberg University Against the backdrop of escalating violence in Ukraine, Sino-Russian relations were on the fast track over the past four months in three broad areas: strategic coordination, economics, and mil- mil relations. This was particularly evident during President Putin’s state visit to China in late May when the two countries inked a 30-year, $400 billion gas deal after 20 years of hard negotiation. Meanwhile, the two navies were drilling off the East China Sea coast and the Conference on Interaction and Confidence Building Measures in Asia (CICA) was being held in Shanghai. Beyond this, Moscow and Beijing were instrumental in pushing the creation of the $50 billion BRICS development bank and a $100 billion reserve fund after years of frustrated waiting for a bigger voice for the developing world in the IMF and World Bank. Putin in Shanghai for state visit and more President Vladimir Putin traveled to Shanghai on May 20-21 to meet Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping. This was the seventh time they have met since March 2013 when Xi assumed the presidency in China. The trip was made against a backdrop of a deepening crisis in Ukraine: 42 pro-Russian activists were killed in the Odessa fire on May 2 and pro-Russian separatists in Donetsk and Luhansk declared independence on May 11. Four days after Putin’s China trip, the Ukrainian Army unveiled its “anti-terrorist operations,” and on July 17 Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 was downed.
    [Show full text]
  • EURASIA Russian Heavy Artillery
    EURASIA Russian Heavy Artillery: Leaving Depots and Returning to Service OE Watch Commentary: The Soviet Union developed large caliber artillery, such as the 2S4 ‘Tyulpan’ 240mm mortar and the 2S7 ‘Pion’ 203mm howitzer, to suppress lines of communication, destroy enemy headquarters, tactical nuclear weapons, logistic areas, and other important targets and to destroy urban areas and field fortifications. After the end of the Cold War, the Russian Federation placed most of these large caliber artillery systems into long-term storage depots for several reasons. The first is that they were intended to deliver nuclear, as well as conventional, munitions (the end of the Cold War meant that a long-range tactical nuclear weapon delivery was no longer needed). Another reason is that better tube (2S19M Msta-SM) and missile (MLRS/SRBM/GLCM) systems, such as new 300mm MLRS platforms, the Iskander missile system, and the 2S19M Msta-SM 152mm howitzer, allow Russia to fulfill many of the same tasks as large caliber artillery to varying degrees. The 2S4 ‘Tyulpan’ self-propelled mortar is equipped with a 240mm 2B8 mortar mounted on a modified Object 123 tracked chassis (similar to the 2S3 Akatsiya self-propelled howitzer) with a V-59 V-12, 520 horsepower diesel engine, capable of 60 km/h road speed. The Tyulpan has a crew of four, but five additional crewman are carried in the support vehicle that typically accompanies it. The system is capable of firing conventional, chemical, and nuclear munitions at a rate of one round per minute, although Russia reportedly now only has conventional munitions in service.
    [Show full text]
  • India's Prospects in the Area of Ballistic Missile Defense
    РАБОЧИЕ МАТЕРИАЛЫ WORKING PAPERS МОСКОВСКИЙ ЦЕНТР КАРНЕГИ CARNEGIE MOSCOW CENTER Petr toPychkanov IndIa’s ProsPects In the area of BallIstIc MIssIle defense: a regIonal securIty PersPectIve 32012 WORKING PAPERS № 3 • 2012 PETR TOPYCHKANOV INDIA’S PROSPECTS IN THE AREA OF BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE: A REGIONAL SECURITY PERSPECTIVE МОСКОВСКИЙ ЦЕНТР КАРНЕГИ CARNEGIE MOSCOW CENTER The Working Papers series was founded in 1999. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the Carnegie Endowment or the Carnegie Moscow Center. Carnegie Moscow Center Russia, 125009 Moscow, Tverskaya ul., 16/2. Tel: +7 (495) 935-8904 Fax: +7 (495) 935-8906 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.carnegie.ru Electronic versions of all Carnegie Moscow Center publications may be found at: http://www.carnegie.ru The Carnegie Moscow Center is an independent public policy research institution that promotes intellectual collaboration among Russian and international scholars and policy experts and provides analysis on a wide range of political, economic, and social issues. The main vehicles for its work are its publications and seminars. Working Papers provide readers with access to the main current research on Russian and Eurasian domestic and foreign policy. The series includes intermediate results of research and articles for immediate release. You may send your comments to the email address above. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace or the Carnegie Moscow Center. The publication is distributed freeofcharge.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Military Utility of Spectral Design in Signature Management: a Systems Approach
    National Defence University Series 1: Research Publications No. 21 On the Military Utility of Spectral Design in Signature Management: a Systems Approach On the Military Utility of Spectral Design in Signature On the Military Utility of Spectral Design in Signature Management: a Systems Approach Kent Andersson Kent Andersson National Defence University PL 7, 00861 HELSINKI Tel. +358 299 800 www.mpkk.fi ISBN 978-951-25-2998-8 (pbk.) ISBN 978-951-25-2999-5 (PDF) ISSN 2342-9992 (print) ISSN 2343-0001 (web) Series 1, No. 21 The Finnish Defence Forces KENT ANDERSSON ON THE MILITARY UTILITY OF SPECTRAL DESIGN IN SIGNATURE MANAGEMENT: A SYSTEMS APPROACH Doctoral dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Military Sciences to be presented, with the consent of the Finnish National Defence University, for public examination in Sverigesalen, at the Swedish Defence University, Drottning Kristinas väg 37, in Stockholm, on Friday 13th of April at 1 pm. NATIONAL DEFENCE UNIVERSITY HELSINKI 2018 NATIONAL DEFENCE UNIVERSITY SERIES 1: RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS NO. 21 FINSKA FÖRSVARSUNIVERSITETET SERIE 1: FORSKINGSPUBLIKATIONER NR. 21 ON THE MILITARY UTILITY OF SPECTRAL DESIGN IN SIGNATURE MANAGEMENT: A SYSTEMS APPROACH KENT ANDERSSON NATIONAL DEFENCE UNIVERSITY HELSINKI 2018 Kent Andersson: On the Military Utility of Spectral Design in Signature Management: a Sys- tems Approach National Defence University, Finland Series 1: Research Publications No. 21 Doctoral dissertation Finska Försvarshögskolan Publikationsserie 1: Forskingspublikationer nr. 21 Doktorsavhandling Author: Lt Col, Tech. Lic. Kent Andersson Supervising professor: Professor Jouko Vankka, National Defence University, Finland Preliminary examiners: Professor Harold Lawson, Prof. Emeritus, ACM, IEEE and INCOSE Fellow, IEEE Computer pioneer, Sweden Professor Christer Larsson, Lund University, Sweden Official opponents: Professor Jari Hartikainen, Finnish Defence Research Agency, Finland Professor Harold Lawson, Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Avoiding Another War Between Israel and Hezbollah
    COUNTING THE COST Avoiding Another War between Israel and Hezbollah By Nicholas Blanford and Assaf Orion “He who wishes to fight must first count the cost.” Sun Tzu, The Art of War ABOUT THE SCOWCROFT MIDDLE EAST SECURITY INITIATIVE The Atlantic Council’s Scowcroft Middle East Security Initiative honors the legacy of Brent Scowcroft and his tireless efforts to build a new security architecture for the region. Our work in this area addresses the full range of security threats and challenges including the danger of interstate warfare, the role of terrorist groups and other nonstate actors, and the underlying security threats facing countries in the region. Through all of the Council’s Middle East programming, we work with allies and partners in Europe and the wider Middle East to protect US interests, build peace and security, and unlock the human potential of the region. You can read more about our programs at www.atlanticcouncil.org/ programs/middle-east-programs/. May 2020 ISBN-13: 978-1-61977-099-7 This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. This report is made possible by general support to the Atlantic Council’s Middle East Programs. COUNTING THE COST Avoiding Another War between Israel and Hezbollah CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 112/2021 17 May 20211
    - 1 - 1 Daily Report 112/2021 17 May 20211 Summary In Donetsk region, between the evenings of 14 and 16 May, the SMM recorded 1,173 ceasefire violations, including 53 explosions. In the previous reporting period, it recorded 197 ceasefire violations in the region. In Luhansk region, between the evenings of 14 and 16 May, the Mission recorded 192 ceasefire violations, including 67 explosions. In the previous reporting period, it recorded 74 ceasefire violations in the region. A man was injured due to undetermined explosive objects in Dovhe and a girl was injured due to gunfire in Voznesenivka (formerly Chervonopartyzansk), Luhansk region. The SMM continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske. It recorded ceasefire violations inside the disengagement area near Petrivske and SMM unmanned-aerial vehicles spotted people inside the disengagement areas near Zolote and Petrivske. The Mission facilitated and monitored adherence to localized ceasefires to enable the operation of critical civilian infrastructure. The SMM continued following up on the situation of civilians, including at three entry-exit checkpoints and the corresponding checkpoints of the armed formations in Luhansk region. The Mission’s freedom of movement continued to be restricted.* 1 Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30, 16 May 2021. All times are in Eastern European Summer Time. - 2 - Ceasefire violations 2 Number of recorded ceasefire violations 3 Number of recorded explosions4 2 For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table. During the reporting period, the SMM cameras in Petrivske and in Stanytsia Luhanska were not operational.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee of Ministers Secretariat Du Comite Des Ministres
    SECRETARIAT GENERAL SECRETARIAT OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS SECRETARIAT DU COMITE DES MINISTRES Contact: Clare OVEY Tel: 03 88 41 36 45 Date: 12/01/2018 DH-DD(2018)32 Documents distributed at the request of a Representative shall be under the sole responsibility of the said Representative, without prejudice to the legal or political position of the Committee of Ministers. Meeting: 1310th meeting (March 2018) (DH) Item reference: Action plan (09/01/2018) Communication from Ukraine concerning the case of NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine (Application No. 54825/00) * * * * * * * * * * * Les documents distribués à la demande d’un/e Représentant/e le sont sous la seule responsabilité dudit/de ladite Représentant/e, sans préjuger de la position juridique ou politique du Comité des Ministres. Réunion : 1310e réunion (mars 2018) (DH) Référence du point : Plan d’action Communication de l’Ukraine concernant l’affaire NEVMERZHITSKY c. Ukraine (requête n° 54825/00) (anglais uniquement) DH-DD(2018)32 : Communication from Ukraine. Documents distributed at the request of a Representative shall be under the sole responsibility of the said Representative, without prejudice to the legal or political position of the Committee of Ministers. DGI 09 JAN. 2018 Annex to the letter of the Agent of Ukraine SERVICE DE L’EXECUTION before the European Court of Human Rights DES ARRETS DE LA CEDH of 05 January 2018 no. 190/5.2.1/ін-18 Updated Action plan on measures to be taken for implementation of the European Court’s judgments in the cases of Nevmerzhitsky group v. Ukraine (application no. 54825/00, judgment of 05/04/2005, final on 12/10/2005); Yakovenko group (Application No.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 258/2020 29 October 2020 1 Summary
    - 1 - Daily Report 258/2020 29 October 2020 1 Summary • The SMM recorded one ceasefire violation in Donetsk region and none in Luhansk region. In the previous reporting period, it recorded two ceasefire violations in Donetsk region and none in Luhansk region. • A man died due to the detonation of a hand grenade in Sievierodonetsk, Luhansk region. • The SMM continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske. During evening hours, an SMM long-range unmanned aerial vehicle spotted four people inside the disengagement area near Zolote. • The Mission facilitated and monitored adherence to localised ceasefires to enable repairs to and the operation of critical civilian infrastructure. • The SMM continued following up on the situation of civilians amid the COVID-19 pandemic, including at entry-exit checkpoint in Luhansk region and checkpoints of the armed formations in both Donetsk and Luhansk regions. • The Mission visited two border crossing points in non-government-controlled areas of Luhansk region. • The Mission’s freedom of movement continued to be restricted, including at border crossing points outside government control near Dovzhanske and Voznesenivka, Luhansk region (including at a railway station).* Ceasefire violations 2 Number of recorded ceasefire violations 3 Number of recorded explosions 4 1 Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30, 28 October 2020. All times are in Eastern European Time. 2 For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table. During the reporting period, the SMM cameras in Petrivske and Berezove were not operational. 3 Including explosions 4 Including from unidentified weapons - 2 - Map of recorded ceasefire violations - 3 - In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded one ceasefire violation, an undetermined explosion, while facilitating and monitoring adherence to a localised ceasefire in Betmanove (formerly Krasnyi Partyzan, non-government-controlled, 23km north-east of Donetsk).
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 40/2020 18 February 20201 Summary
    - 1 - Daily Report 40/2020 18 February 20201 Summary • Compared with the previous 24 hours, the SMM recorded more ceasefire violations in Donetsk region and fewer in Luhansk region. • The Mission continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske. • The SMM saw weapons in violation of withdrawal lines on both sides of the contact line in Donetsk region and in a non-government-controlled area of Luhansk region. • An SMM long-range unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) spotted three electronic warfare systems and an active radar system near non-government-controlled Verbova Balka. • An SMM long-range UAV spotted a train moving eastwards towards the border near non- government-controlled Voznesenivka. • Due to signal interference, the SMM lost connection with two of its mini-UAVs near non-government-controlled Holubivske and was unable to recover them. • The SMM’s freedom of movement was restricted again at checkpoints of the armed formations in Verkhnoshyrokivske in southern Donetsk region and close to a border area near non-government-controlled Voznesenivka in Luhansk region.* Ceasefire violations2 Number of recorded ceasefire violations3 Number of recorded explosions4 1 Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30, 17 February 2020. All times are in Eastern European Time. 2 For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table. The SMM cameras near Bohdanivka and Hnutove were not operational during the reporting period. 3 Including explosions. 4 Including from unidentified weapons. - 2 - Map of recorded ceasefire violations - 3 - In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded more ceasefire violations, including more explosions (about 105), compared with the previous 24 hours (15 explosions).
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Military Studies Office
    community.apan.org/wg/tradoc-g2/fmso/ PENDING PUBLIC RELEASE/APPROVAL - QUESTIONS: 757-501-6236 Foreign Military Studies Office Volume 9 Issue #10 OEWATCH October 2019 FOREIGN NEWS & PERSPECTIVES OF THE OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT EURASIA 28 New Chinese Aircraft Carrier to Carry 50 Percent More 3 Sinking the Armata? Fighters AFRICA 4 Where is Strelkov Aiming? 30 China and Kazakhstan Upgrade Ties 59 Urban Deployment Reveals South African Military Deficiencies 5 Northern and Eastern Military Districts Get S-300V4 Air 32 China and Russia Sign Heavy Helicopter Deal 60 South Africa’s Xenophobic Violence: Foreigners as Scapegoats Defense Systems 34 China Reports the Launch of Unmanned ‘Mini-Aegis-Class for Failing Economy 7 Russian Ground Forces’ Air Defense: A Look At Russia’s Destroyer’ 61 Somalia’s Newest Military Commander Also Its Youngest Threat-Based Military 35 Contrasting Chinese and Foreign Media Accounts on 62 African Union Raises Concerns Over Foreign Military Bases in 8 The Modernization of Russian Coastal Defense Missiles Xinjiang Africa 10 Mines Seen as Key Capabilities for Russian Naval and Coastal 37 Papuans Hope for Independence, but is it Possible? 63 Regional Rivalries Heat Up as AMISOM Leaves Somalia Defense 39 Another Counter-Terrorism Operation in Palu, Indonesia 64 China’s Investment in African Aviation 12 Russia Developing On-Orbit Fueling Technologies 40 India to Create New Chief of Defence Staff Position 65 International Connections to Guinea-Bissau Drug Trafficking 13 Public Protests and “Hybrid War” 66 Borno Governor
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine 2014
    TheRaising Chinese Red Flags: QLZ87 Automatic Grenade An Examination of Arms & Munitions in the Ongoing LauncherConflict in Ukraine 2014 Jonathan Ferguson & N.R. Jenzen-Jones RESEARCH REPORT No. 3 COPYRIGHT Published in Australia by Armament Research Services (ARES) © Armament Research Services Pty. Ltd. Published in November 2014 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Armament Research Services, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organisation. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Publications Manager, Armament Research Services: [email protected] CREDITS Authors: Jonathan Ferguson & N.R. Jenzen-Jones Contributors: Yuri Lyamin & Michael Smallwood Technical Review: Yuri Lyamin, Ian McCollum & Hans Migielski Copy Editor: Jean Yew Layout/Design: Yianna Paris, Green Shell Media ABOUT ARMAMENT RESEARCH SERVICES Armament Research Services (ARES) is a specialist consultancy which offers technical expertise and analysis to a range of government and non-government entities in the arms and munitions field.ARES fills a critical market gap, and offers unique technical support to other actors operating in the sector. Drawing on the extensive experience and broad-ranging skillsets of our staff and contractors, ARES delivers full-spectrum research and analysis, technical review, training, and project support services, often in support of national, regional, and international initiatives. ARMAMENT RESEARCH SERVICES Pty. Ltd. t + 61 8 6365 4401 e [email protected] w www.armamentresearch.com Jonathan Ferguson & N.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 15 April 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY …………………………………………………. 3 I. INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………. 6 A. Context B. Universal and regional human rights instruments ratified by Ukraine C. UN human rights response D. Methodology III. UNDERLYING HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS ……………………… … 10 A. Corruption and violations of economic and social rights B. Lack of accountability for human rights violations and weak rule of law institutions IV. HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS RELATED TO THE MAIDAN PROTESTS ……………………………………………………… 13 A. Violations of the right to freedom of assembly B. Excessive use of force, killings, disappearances, torture and ill-treatment C. Accountability and national investigations V. CURRENT OVERALL HUMAN RIGHTS CHALLENGES ……………… 15 A. Protection of minority rights B. Freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and the right to information C. Incitement to hatred, discrimination or violence D. Lustration, judicial and security sector reforms VI. SPECIFIC HUMAN RIGHTS CHALLENGES IN CRIMEA …………….. 20 VII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ………………………….. 22 A. Conclusions B. Recommendations for immediate action C. Long-term recommendations Annex I: Concept Note for the deployment of the UN human rights monitoring mission in Ukraine 2 | P a g e I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. During March 2014 ASG Ivan Šimonović visited Ukraine twice, and travelled to Bakhchisaray, Kyiv, Kharkiv, Lviv, Sevastopol and Simferopol, where he met with national and local authorities, Ombudspersons, civil society and other representatives, and victims of alleged human rights abuses. This report is based on his findings, also drawing on the work of the newly established United Nations Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU).
    [Show full text]