Seney National Wildlife Refuge • Common Name(Order

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Seney National Wildlife Refuge • Common Name(Order Seney National Wildlife Refuge Flora • Common Name(Order Family Genus species) Monocotyledons • Arum, Green Arrow (Arales Araceae Peltranda virginica) • Arethusa (Orchidales Orchidaceae Arethusa bulbosa) • Arrowhead, Grassy (Alismatales Alismataceae Sagittaria graminea) • Bentgrass, Redtop (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Agrostis gigantea) • Bluegrass, Fowl (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Poa palustris) • Bluegrass, Kentucky (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Poa pratensis) • Brome, Smooth (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Bromus inermis) • Bulrush, Hardstem (Cyperales Cyperaceae Scirpus acutus) • Bulrush, Three-square (Cyperales Cyperaceae Scirpus americanus) • Bur-reed, Common (Typhales Sparganiaceae Sparganium eurycarpum) • Bur-reed, Eastern (Typhales Sparganiaceae Sparganium americanum) • Bur-reed, Floating (Typhales Sparganiaceae Sparganium angustifolium) • Bur-reed, Floating-leaf (Typhales Sparganiaceae Sparganium fluctuans) • Bur-reed, Least (Typhales Sparganiaceae Sparganium minimum) • Canarygrass, Reed (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Phalaris arundinaceae) • Cattail, Common (Typhales Typaceae Typha latifolia) • Cattail, Common Hybrid (Typhales Typaceae Typha x glauca) • Cattail, Narrow-leaved (Typhales Typaceae Typha angustifolia) • Celery, Wild (Hydrocharitales Hydrocharitaceae Vallisneria americana) • Chives (Liliales Liliaceae Allium schoenoprasum) • Coral-root, Spotted (Orchidales Orchidaceae Corallorhiza maculata) • Cordgrass (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Spartina pectinata) • Cottongrass, Tall (Cyperales Cyperaceae Eriophorum angustifolium) • Cottongrass, Tawny (Cyperales Cyperaceae Eriophorum virginicum) • Cucumber, Wild (Liliales Liliaceae Streptopus amplexifolius) • Cucumber-root, Indian (Liliales Liliaceae Medeola virginiana) • Duckweed, Lesser (Arales Lemnaeae Lemna minor) • Flag, Wild Blue (Liliales Iridaceae Iris versicolor) • Grass, Blue-eyed (Liliales Iridaceae Sisyrinchium montanum) • Grass, Orchard (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Dactylis glomerata) • Grass, Rattlesnake (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Glyceria canadensis) • Grass, Rough Barnyard (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Echinochloa muricata) • Jack-in-the-pulpit (Arales Araceae Arisaema triphyllum) • Ladies'-tresses, Nodding (Orchidales Orchidaceae Spiranthes cernua) • Ladies'-tresses, Slender (Orchidales Orchidaceae Spiranthes lacera) • Lady's-slipper, Pink (Orchidales Orchidaceae Cypripedium acaule) • Lily, Wood (Liliales Liliaceae Lilium philadelphicum) • Lily-of-the-valley, False (Liliales Liliaceae Maianthemum canadense) • Mannagrass, Northern (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Glyceria borealis) • Naiad, Slender (Najadales Najadaceae Najas flexilis) • Nutsedge, Yellow (Cyperales Cyperaceae Cyperus esculentus) • Orchid, Club-spur (Orchidales Orchidaceae Habernaria clavellata) • Orchid, Purple Fringed (Orchidales Orchidaceae Habernaria psycodes) • Orchid, Ragged Fringed (Orchidales Orchidaceae Habernaria lacera) • Pipewort (Eriocaulales Eriocaulaceae Eriocaulon septangulare) • Pogonia, Rose (Orchidales Orchidaceae Pogonia ophioglossoides) • Pondweed, Alga (Potamogetonales Potamogetonaceae Potamogeton confervoides) • Pondweed, Alpine (Potamogetonales Potamogetonaceae Potamogeton alpinus) • Pondweed, Big-leaf (Potamogetonales Potamogetonaceae Potamogeton amplifolius) • Pondweed, Fern-leaf (Potamogetonales Potamogetonaceae Potamogeton robbinsii) • Pondweed, Flat-stalked (Potamogetonales Potamogetonaceae Potamogeton friesii) • Pondweed, Flat-stem (Potamogetonales Potamogetonaceae Potamogeton zosteriformis) • Pondweed, Floating-leaved (Potamogetonales Potamogetonaceae Potamogeton natans) • Pondweed, Grass-leaved (Potamogetonales Potamogetonaceae Potamogeton gramineus) • Pondweed, Illinois (Potamogetonales Potamogetonaceae Potamogeton illinoensis) • Pondweed, Leafy (Potamogetonales Potamogetonaceae Potamogeton foliosus) • Pondweed, Hybrid (Potamogetonales Potamogetonaceae Potamogeton x longiligulatus) • Pondweed, Ribbon-leaf Pondweed. (Potamogetonales Potamogetonaceae Potamogeton epihydrus) • Pondweed, Richardson's Pondweed (Potamogetonales Potamogetonaceae Potamogeton richardsonii) • Pondweed, Sago (Potamogetonales Potamogetonaceae Potamogeton pectinatus) • Pondweed, Slender-leaved (Potamogetonales Potamogetonaceae Potamogeton filiformis) • Pondweed, Small (Potamogetonales Potamogetonaceae Potamogeton berchtoldii) • Pondweed, White-stemmed (Potamogetonales Potamogetonaceae Potamogeton praelongus) • Quackgrass (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Agropyron repens) • Reedgrass, Blue-joint (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Calamagrostis canadensis) • Rice, Wild (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Zizania aquatica) • Ricegrass (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Oryzopsis asperifolia) • Rush, Annual (Juncales Juncaceae Juncus pelocarpus) • Rush, Common (Juncales Juncaceae Juncus effusus) • Rush, Jointed (Juncales Juncaceae Juncus nodosus) • Rush, Marsh (Juncales Juncaceae Juncus canadensis) • Rush, Narrow (Juncales Juncaceae Juncus brevicaudatus) • Ryegrass (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Lolium perenne) • Sedge, Bebb's (Cyperales Cyperaceae Carex bebbii) • Sedge, Bog (Cyperales Cyperaceae Carex oligosperma) • Sedge, Bottle (Cyperales Cyperaceae Carex rostrata) • Sedge, Crawford's (Cyperales Cyperaceae Carex crawfordii) • Sedge, Cyperus (Cyperales Cyperaceae Carex pseudo-cyperus) • Sedge, Flat (Cyperales Cyperaceae Cyperus odoratus) • Sedge, Fringed (Cyperales Cyperaceae Carex crinita) • Sedge, Hairy (Cyperales Cyperaceae Carex lacustris) • Sedge, Slender (Cyperales Cyperaceae Carex lasiocarpa) • Sedge, Swollen (Cyperales Cyperaceae Carex intumescens) • Sedge, Tuckerman (Cyperales Cyperaceae Carex tuckermanii) • Sedge, Yellow (Cyperales Cyperaceae Carex pensylvanica) • Sedge, Three-way (Cyperales Cyperaceae Dulichium arundinaceum) • Solomon's-seal, Hairy (Liliales Liliaceae Polygonatum pubescens) • Solomon's-seal, Starry False (Liliales Liliaceae Smilacina stellata) • Solomon's-seal, Three-leaved False (Liliales Liliaceae Smilacina trifolia) • Spike-rush, Needle (Cyperales Cyperaceae Eleocharis acicularis) • Spike-rush, Small's (Cyperales Cyperaceae Eleocharis smallii) • Spikenard, False (Liliales Liliaceae Smilacina racemosa) • Stargrass, Water (Liliales Pontederiaceae Heteranthera dubia) • Timothy (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Phleum pratense) • Trillium, Common (Liliales Liliaceae Trillium grandiflorum) • Trillium, Nodding (Liliales Liliaceae Trillium cernuum) • Twayblade, Broad-leaved (Orchidales Orchidaceae Listera convallarioides) • Wapato (Alismatales Alismataceae Sagittaria latifolia) • Woolgrass(Cyperales Cyperaceae Scirpus cyperinus) Dicotyledons • Barberry, Japanese (Ranunculales Berberidaceae Berberis thunbergii) • Buckthorn, Glossy (Rhamnales Rhamnaceae Rhamnus frangula) • Butter-and-eggs, (Scrophulariales Scrophularialceae Linaria vulgaris) • Buttercup, Tall (Ranunculales Ranunculaceae Ranunculus acris) • Campion, Bladder (Caryophyllales Caryophyllaceae Silene vulgaris) • Catnip (Lamiales Lamiaceae/Labiatae Nepeta cataria) • Cinquefoil, Silvery (Rosales Rosaceae Potentilla argentea) • Clover, White (Fabales Fabaceae/Leguminosae Trifolium repens) • Clover, White Sweet (Fabales Fabaceae/Leguminosae Melilotus alba) • Clover, Yellow Sweet (Fabales Fabaceae/Leguminosae Melilotus officinalis) • Daisy, Oxeye (Asterales Asteraceae/Compositae Chrysanthemum leusanthemum) • Goat's-beard, Yellow (Asterales Asteraceae/Compositae Tragopogon pratensis) • Hawkweed, Orange (Asterales Asteraceae/Compositae Hieracium aurantiacum) • Heal-all (Lamiales Lamiaceae/Labiatae Prunella vulgaris) • Honeysuckle, Tartarian (Caryophyllales Caprifoliaceae Lonicera tatarica) • Knapweed, Spotted (Asterales Asteraceae/Compositae Centaurea maculosa) • Live-forever (Rosales Crassulaceae Sedum telephium [purpureum]) • Loosestrife, Purple (Myrtales Lythraceae Lythrum salicaria) • Mallow, Musk (Malvales Malvaceae Malva moschata) • Mullein, Giant (Scrophulariales Scrophulariaceae Verbascum thapsus) • Plantain, Common (Plantaginales Plantaginaceae Plantago major) • Queen-Anne's-lace (Apiales/Umbellales Apiaceae/Umbelliferae Daucus carota) • Rose, Multiflora (Rosales Rosaceae Rosa multiflora) • St.
Recommended publications
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Information.Pdf
    SUPPORTING INFORMATION Analysis of 41 plant genomes supports a wave of successful genome duplications in association with the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary Kevin Vanneste1,2, Guy Baele3, Steven Maere1,2,*, and Yves Van de Peer1,2,4,* 1 Department of Plant Systems Biology, VIB, Ghent, Belgium 2 Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium 3 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium 4 Department of Genetics, Genomics Research Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa *Corresponding authors Yves Van de Peer Steven Maere VIB / Ghent University VIB / Ghent University Technologiepark 927 Technologiepark 927 Gent (9052), Belgium Gent (9052), Belgium Tel: +32 (0)9 331 3807 Tel: +32 (0)9 331 3805 Fax: +32 (0)9 331 3809 Fax: +32 (0)9 331 3809 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Overview Species grouping topology ................................................ 3 Calibrations and constraints .............................................. 5 Alternative calibrations and constraints ............................ 13 Relative rate tests ............................................................. 27 Re-dating the Pyrus bretschneideri WGD ......................... 30 WGD age estimates from literature ................................... 33 Eschscholzia californica and Acorus americanus ............. 34 2 Species grouping topology In order to date the node joining the homeologous pair, orthogroups were constructed consisting of both homeologs and orthologs from other plant species for which full genome sequence information was available. Different plant species were grouped into ‘species groups’ for which one ortholog was selected and added to the orthogroup, in order to keep the orthogroup topology fixed and to facilitate automation on the one hand, but also to allow enough orthogroups to be constructed on the other hand (see Material and methods).
    [Show full text]
  • Arthur Monrad Johnson Colletion of Botanical Drawings
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt7489r5rb No online items Arthur Monrad Johnson colletion of botanical drawings 1914-1941 Processed by Pat L. Walter. Louise M. Darling Biomedical Library History and Special Collections Division History and Special Collections Division UCLA 12-077 Center for Health Sciences Box 951798 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1798 Phone: 310/825-6940 Fax: 310/825-0465 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.library.ucla.edu/libraries/biomed/his/ ©2008 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Arthur Monrad Johnson colletion 48 1 of botanical drawings 1914-1941 Descriptive Summary Title: Arthur Monrad Johnson colletion of botanical drawings, Date (inclusive): 1914-1941 Collection number: 48 Creator: Johnson, Arthur Monrad 1878-1943 Extent: 3 boxes (2.5 linear feet) Repository: University of California, Los Angeles. Library. Louise M. Darling Biomedical Library History and Special Collections Division Los Angeles, California 90095-1490 Abstract: Approximately 1000 botanical drawings, most in pen and black ink on paper, of the structural parts of angiosperms and some gymnosperms, by Arthur Monrad Johnson. Many of the illustrations have been published in the author's scientific publications, such as his "Taxonomy of the Flowering Plants" and articles on the genus Saxifraga. Dr. Johnson was both a respected botanist and an accomplished artist beyond his botanical subjects. Physical location: Collection stored off-site (Southern Regional Library Facility): Advance notice required for access. Language of Material: Collection materials in English Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Arthur Monrad Johnson colletion of botanical drawings (Manuscript collection 48). Louise M. Darling Biomedical Library History and Special Collections Division, University of California, Los Angeles.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from 20 Years of Plant Genome Sequencing: an Unprecedented Resource in Need of More Diverse Representation
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.31.446451; this version posted May 31, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Lessons from 20 years of plant genome sequencing: an unprecedented resource in need of more diverse representation Authors: Rose A. Marks1,2,3, Scott Hotaling4, Paul B. Frandsen5,6, and Robert VanBuren1,2 1. Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA 2. Plant Resilience Institute, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA 3. Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa 4. School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA 5. Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA 6. Data Science Lab, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA Keywords: plants, embryophytes, genomics, colonialism, broadening participation Correspondence: Rose A. Marks, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; Email: [email protected]; Phone: (603) 852-3190; ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7102-5959 Abstract The field of plant genomics has grown rapidly in the past 20 years, leading to dramatic increases in both the quantity and quality of publicly available genomic resources. With an ever- expanding wealth of genomic data from an increasingly diverse set of taxa, unprecedented potential exists to better understand the evolution and genome biology of plants.
    [Show full text]
  • 1083 a Ground-Breaking Study Published 5 Years Ago Revealed That
    American Journal of Botany 100(6): 1083–1094. 2013. SPECIAL INVITED PAPER—EVOLUTION OF PLANT MATING SYSTEMS P OLLINATION AND MATING SYSTEMS OF APODANTHACEAE AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF REPRODUCTIVE TRAITS 1 IN PARASITIC ANGIOSPERMS S IDONIE B ELLOT 2 AND S USANNE S. RENNER 2 Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Str. 67 80638 Munich, Germany • Premise of the study: The most recent reviews of the reproductive biology and sexual systems of parasitic angiosperms were published 17 yr ago and reported that dioecy might be associated with parasitism. We use current knowledge on parasitic lineages and their sister groups, and data on the reproductive biology and sexual systems of Apodanthaceae, to readdress the question of possible trends in the reproductive biology of parasitic angiosperms. • Methods: Fieldwork in Zimbabwe and Iran produced data on the pollinators and sexual morph frequencies in two species of Apodanthaceae. Data on pollinators, dispersers, and sexual systems in parasites and their sister groups were compiled from the literature. • Key results: With the possible exception of some Viscaceae, most of the ca. 4500 parasitic angiosperms are animal-pollinated, and ca. 10% of parasites are dioecious, but the gain and loss of dioecy across angiosperms is too poorly known to infer a statisti- cal correlation. The studied Apodanthaceae are dioecious and pollinated by nectar- or pollen-foraging Calliphoridae and other fl ies. • Conclusions: Sister group comparisons so far do not reveal any reproductive traits that evolved (or were lost) concomitant with a parasitic life style, but the lack of wind pollination suggests that this pollen vector may be maladaptive in parasites, perhaps because of host foliage or fl owers borne close to the ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2: Plant Lists
    Appendix 2: Plant Lists Master List and Section Lists Mahlon Dickerson Reservation Botanical Survey and Stewardship Assessment Wild Ridge Plants, LLC 2015 2015 MASTER PLANT LIST MAHLON DICKERSON RESERVATION SCIENTIFIC NAME NATIVENESS S-RANK CC PLANT HABIT # OF SECTIONS Acalypha rhomboidea Native 1 Forb 9 Acer palmatum Invasive 0 Tree 1 Acer pensylvanicum Native 7 Tree 2 Acer platanoides Invasive 0 Tree 4 Acer rubrum Native 3 Tree 27 Acer saccharum Native 5 Tree 24 Achillea millefolium Native 0 Forb 18 Acorus calamus Alien 0 Forb 1 Actaea pachypoda Native 5 Forb 10 Adiantum pedatum Native 7 Fern 7 Ageratina altissima v. altissima Native 3 Forb 23 Agrimonia gryposepala Native 4 Forb 4 Agrostis canina Alien 0 Graminoid 2 Agrostis gigantea Alien 0 Graminoid 8 Agrostis hyemalis Native 2 Graminoid 3 Agrostis perennans Native 5 Graminoid 18 Agrostis stolonifera Invasive 0 Graminoid 3 Ailanthus altissima Invasive 0 Tree 8 Ajuga reptans Invasive 0 Forb 3 Alisma subcordatum Native 3 Forb 3 Alliaria petiolata Invasive 0 Forb 17 Allium tricoccum Native 8 Forb 3 Allium vineale Alien 0 Forb 2 Alnus incana ssp rugosa Native 6 Shrub 5 Alnus serrulata Native 4 Shrub 3 Ambrosia artemisiifolia Native 0 Forb 14 Amelanchier arborea Native 7 Tree 26 Amphicarpaea bracteata Native 4 Vine, herbaceous 18 2015 MASTER PLANT LIST MAHLON DICKERSON RESERVATION SCIENTIFIC NAME NATIVENESS S-RANK CC PLANT HABIT # OF SECTIONS Anagallis arvensis Alien 0 Forb 4 Anaphalis margaritacea Native 2 Forb 3 Andropogon gerardii Native 4 Graminoid 1 Andropogon virginicus Native 2 Graminoid 1 Anemone americana Native 9 Forb 6 Anemone quinquefolia Native 7 Forb 13 Anemone virginiana Native 4 Forb 5 Antennaria neglecta Native 2 Forb 2 Antennaria neodioica ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Allergy Syndrome: a Confuence of Immunology and Phylogeny by Merle K
    NATIONAL CENTER FOR CASE STUDY TEACHING IN SCIENCE NATIONAL CENTER FOR CASE STUDY TEACHING IN SCIENCE Oral Allergy Syndrome: A Confuence of Immunology and Phylogeny by Merle K. Heidemann, Mike S. Taylor, Amanda Storm, Cassie Dresser-Briggs, Alexa Warwick, and Peter J.T. White Objectives Upon completion of this case study, you should be able to: • Explain the symptoms of allergic reactions in terms of cell biology (immune system cells). • Describe the molecular features of cross reactivity. • Build phylogenetic trees using morphological data. • Build phylogenetic trees using molecular data and interpret two kinds of phylogenetic trees. Part I – Immunology Sam had a history of allergic reactions, including reactions to various plant pollens. Birch pollen elicited a particularly strong reaction, causing him annoying sneezing fts and a sore throat. As he grew to adulthood, he discovered that he was also variably allergic to common foods, including some raw fruits and vegetables, as well as most nuts. Sam was puzzled by his recent food allergies. Also puzzling was the variability in his reactions. He reacted strongly to some foods; others resulted in only a mild itchy throat. He wondered, What exactly causes allergic reactions? Sam was determined to fgure out how and why he reacted to birch pollen and later became allergic to other plant- based food. He also hoped this information might help him avoid other foods that might cause him allergies. First, Sam decided he needed to know something about the cellular bases of allergic reactions. He knew it had some- thing to do with the immune system. He did some basic research on the Internet and here’s what he found: Allergens are bits of protein from an innocuous foreign substance, such as pollen or food.
    [Show full text]
  • GENOME EVOLUTION in MONOCOTS a Dissertation
    GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School At the University of Missouri In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By Kate L. Hertweck Dr. J. Chris Pires, Dissertation Advisor JULY 2011 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS Presented by Kate L. Hertweck A candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy And hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Dr. J. Chris Pires Dr. Lori Eggert Dr. Candace Galen Dr. Rose‐Marie Muzika ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to many people for their assistance during the course of my graduate education. I would not have derived such a keen understanding of the learning process without the tutelage of Dr. Sandi Abell. Members of the Pires lab provided prolific support in improving lab techniques, computational analysis, greenhouse maintenance, and writing support. Team Monocot, including Dr. Mike Kinney, Dr. Roxi Steele, and Erica Wheeler were particularly helpful, but other lab members working on Brassicaceae (Dr. Zhiyong Xiong, Dr. Maqsood Rehman, Pat Edger, Tatiana Arias, Dustin Mayfield) all provided vital support as well. I am also grateful for the support of a high school student, Cady Anderson, and an undergraduate, Tori Docktor, for their assistance in laboratory procedures. Many people, scientist and otherwise, helped with field collections: Dr. Travis Columbus, Hester Bell, Doug and Judy McGoon, Julie Ketner, Katy Klymus, and William Alexander. Many thanks to Barb Sonderman for taking care of my greenhouse collection of many odd plants brought back from the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Full of Beans: a Study on the Alignment of Two Flowering Plants Classification Systems
    Full of beans: a study on the alignment of two flowering plants classification systems Yi-Yun Cheng and Bertram Ludäscher School of Information Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA {yiyunyc2,ludaesch}@illinois.edu Abstract. Advancements in technologies such as DNA analysis have given rise to new ways in organizing organisms in biodiversity classification systems. In this paper, we examine the feasibility of aligning two classification systems for flowering plants using a logic-based, Region Connection Calculus (RCC-5) ap- proach. The older “Cronquist system” (1981) classifies plants using their mor- phological features, while the more recent Angiosperm Phylogeny Group IV (APG IV) (2016) system classifies based on many new methods including ge- nome-level analysis. In our approach, we align pairwise concepts X and Y from two taxonomies using five basic set relations: congruence (X=Y), inclusion (X>Y), inverse inclusion (X<Y), overlap (X><Y), and disjointness (X!Y). With some of the RCC-5 relationships among the Fabaceae family (beans family) and the Sapindaceae family (maple family) uncertain, we anticipate that the merging of the two classification systems will lead to numerous merged solutions, so- called possible worlds. Our research demonstrates how logic-based alignment with ambiguities can lead to multiple merged solutions, which would not have been feasible when aligning taxonomies, classifications, or other knowledge or- ganization systems (KOS) manually. We believe that this work can introduce a novel approach for aligning KOS, where merged possible worlds can serve as a minimum viable product for engaging domain experts in the loop. Keywords: taxonomy alignment, KOS alignment, interoperability 1 Introduction With the advent of large-scale technologies and datasets, it has become increasingly difficult to organize information using a stable unitary classification scheme over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Bilirubin: an Animal Pigment in the Zingiberales and Diverse Angiosperm Orders Cary L
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 11-5-2010 Bilirubin: an Animal Pigment in the Zingiberales and Diverse Angiosperm Orders Cary L. Pirone Florida International University, [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FI10122201 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the Biochemistry Commons, and the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Pirone, Cary L., "Bilirubin: an Animal Pigment in the Zingiberales and Diverse Angiosperm Orders" (2010). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 336. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/336 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida BILIRUBIN: AN ANIMAL PIGMENT IN THE ZINGIBERALES AND DIVERSE ANGIOSPERM ORDERS A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in BIOLOGY by Cary Lunsford Pirone 2010 To: Dean Kenneth G. Furton College of Arts and Sciences This dissertation, written by Cary Lunsford Pirone, and entitled Bilirubin: An Animal Pigment in the Zingiberales and Diverse Angiosperm Orders, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved. ______________________________________ Bradley C. Bennett ______________________________________ Timothy M. Collins ______________________________________ Maureen A. Donnelly ______________________________________ John. T. Landrum ______________________________________ J. Martin Quirke ______________________________________ David W. Lee, Major Professor Date of Defense: November 5, 2010 The dissertation of Cary Lunsford Pirone is approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions to the Solution of Phylogenetic Problem in Fabales
    Research Article Bartın University International Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences Araştırma Makalesi JONAS, 2(2): 195-206 e-ISSN: 2667-5048 31 Aralık/December, 2019 CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE SOLUTION OF PHYLOGENETIC PROBLEM IN FABALES Deniz Aygören Uluer1*, Rahma Alshamrani 2 1 Ahi Evran University, Cicekdagi Vocational College, Department of Plant and Animal Production, 40700 Cicekdagi, KIRŞEHIR 2 King Abdulaziz University, Department of Biological Sciences, 21589, JEDDAH Abstract Fabales is a cosmopolitan angiosperm order which consists of four families, Leguminosae (Fabaceae), Polygalaceae, Surianaceae and Quillajaceae. The monophyly of the order is supported strongly by several studies, although interfamilial relationships are still poorly resolved and vary between studies; a situation common in higher level phylogenetic studies of ancient, rapid radiations. In this study, we carried out simulation analyses with previously published matK and rbcL regions. The results of our simulation analyses have shown that Fabales phylogeny can be solved and the 5,000 bp fast-evolving data type may be sufficient to resolve the Fabales phylogeny question. In our simulation analyses, while support increased as the sequence length did (up until a certain point), resolution showed mixed results. Interestingly, the accuracy of the phylogenetic trees did not improve with the increase in sequence length. Therefore, this study sounds a note of caution, with respect to interpreting the results of the “more data” approach, because the results have shown that large datasets can easily support an arbitrary root of Fabales. Keywords: Data type, Fabales, phylogeny, sequence length, simulation. 1. Introduction Fabales Bromhead is a cosmopolitan angiosperm order which consists of four families, Leguminosae (Fabaceae) Juss., Polygalaceae Hoffmanns.
    [Show full text]
  • Hitchcock's Sedge
    Natural Heritage Hitchcock’s Sedge & Endangered Species Carex hitchcockiana Dewey Program www.mass.gov/nhesp State Status: Special Concern Federal Status: None Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife GENERAL DESCRIPTION: Hitchcock’s sedge, a member of the Sedge family (Cyperaceae), is a perennial, herbaceous, grass-like plant of rich woodlands. It was named in honor of botanist Edward Hitchcock (1793-1864). It may occur singly or in large stands of slender stems. The plant is 8 to 28 inches (20–70 cm) tall. It is often found in association with other rich woodland herbs under a forest canopy. AIDS TO IDENTIFICATION: To positively identify Hitchcock’s sedge and other members of the genus Carex, a technical manual should be consulted. Species in this genus have tiny, wind-pollinated flowers that are borne in spikes. Each flower is unisexual and is closely subtended by small, flat scales that largely conceal the flowers. The staminate (i.e., pollen-bearing) flowers are subtended by a single scale. The pistillate (i.e., ovule- bearing) flowers are subtended by two scales, an outer flat scale (“pistillate scale”) and an inner, sac-like scale, called a “perigynium,” that encloses the flower, and later, the fruit. Holmgren, Noel H. 1998. The Illustrated Companion to Gleason and Cronquist’s Manual. New York Botanical Garden. Hitchcock’s Sedge belongs to a group of Carex (section illustration). The tiny fruit (“achene”) inside each Griseae) that all have impressed (sunken) perigynia perigynium has a sharply bent beak. Each flowering culm veins. In this species, the perigynium is broadest well has a single, terminal, staminate spike above two to four above the middle (obovate); it tapers gradually toward the pistillate spikes.
    [Show full text]