DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Restoration Plan Long Beach Shoreline Master Program Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Restoration Plan Long Beach Shoreline Master Program Update SMA Grant Agreement No. G1400375 Washington State Department of Ecology Restoration Plan Shoreline Master Program Update Û City of Long Beach Û May 2015 Final Plan: reflects revisions based on comments from the public and the Washington State Department of Ecology This is the work product for Task No. 8 of SMA Grant Agreement No. G1400375 Final Restoration Plan Long Beach Shoreline Master Program Update Prepared by: Under supervision of: The City of Long Beach The Washington State Department of Ecology 115 Bolstad West PO Box 47775 PO Box 310 Olympia, Washington 98504 Long Beach, Washington 98631 Contact: Contact: Gayle Borchard Kim Van Zwalenburg Director of Community Development Senior Regional Shoreline Planner 360.642.4421 360.407.6520 This report funded in part by a grant from the Washington State Department of Ecology Û May 2015 This document should be cited as follows: City of Long Beach, Washington, 2015. Final Restoration Plan: Long Beach Shoreline Master Program Update. May. Table of Contents Section Page Acronyms & Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................ iii Glossary ....................................................................................................................................................... v Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Purposes of this Document ................................................................................................... 3 1.3 How to Use this Document .................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Restoration Principles ........................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Approach to Restoration ........................................................................................................ 5 2.3 Approach to Work .................................................................................................................. 6 3.0 Results ................................................................................................................................. 7 3.1 Degraded Areas .................................................................................................................... 7 3.1.1 Reach No. 1 ........................................................................................................................... 7 3.1.2 Reach No. 2 ........................................................................................................................... 7 3.1.3 Reach No. 3 ........................................................................................................................... 8 3.1.4 Reach No. 4 ........................................................................................................................... 8 3.1.5 Reach No. 5 ........................................................................................................................... 9 3.1.6 Reach No. 6 ........................................................................................................................... 9 3.1.7 Reach No. 7 ........................................................................................................................... 9 3.1.8 Reach No. 8 ......................................................................................................................... 10 3.1.9 Reach No. 9 ......................................................................................................................... 10 3.1.10 Reach No. 10 ....................................................................................................................... 10 3.2 Goals and Priorities ............................................................................................................. 11 3.2.1 Goals and Objectives ........................................................................................................... 11 Restoration Plan i Shoreline Master Program Update, City of Long Beach 3.3 Existing or Foreseeable Restoration Plans and Organizations ............................................ 12 3.3.1 Long Beach Comprehensive Plan ....................................................................................... 12 3.3.2 Pacific County Strategic Plan for Salmon Recovery ............................................................ 12 3.3.3 Pacific County Marine Resource Council (MRC) ......................................................... 13 3.4 Potential Restoration Projects and Programs (Strategies) .................................................. 13 3.4.1 Achieve no net loss .............................................................................................................. 13 3.4.2 Provide restoration opportunities ......................................................................................... 15 3.4.3 Increase biological diversity ................................................................................................. 15 3.5 Restoration Timelines and Benchmarks .............................................................................. 15 3.5.1 In One Year ......................................................................................................................... 15 3.5.2 In Five Years........................................................................................................................ 16 3.5.3 In Ten Years ........................................................................................................................ 16 4.0 Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... 17 5.0 References ......................................................................................................................... 19 APPENDICES APPENDICES A Article: Control of European Beachgrass (Ammophila arenaria) on the West Coast of the United States Û Restoration Plan ii Shoreline Master Program Update, City of Long Beach Acronyms & Abbreviations The first appearance in the text of each of the following acronyms and abbreviations is marked with the symbol. Ecology: Washington State Department of Ecology MHW or MHT: Mean High Water or Mean High Tide MRC: (The Pacific County) Marine Resource Council OHWM: Ordinary high water mark RCW: Revised Code of Washington SCL: Seashore Conservation Line SED: Shoreline Environment Designation SMA: Washington State Shoreline Management Act SMP: Shoreline Master Program SSWS: Shoreline of Statewide Significance WAC: Washington Administrative Code WRIA: Water Resource Inventory Area Û Restoration Plan iii Shoreline Master Program Update, City of Long Beach Blank Page Restoration Plan iv Shoreline Master Program Update, City of Long Beach Glossary The first appearance in the text of each of the following words or phrases is marked with the symbol. 1889 GOVERNMENT MEANDER LINE: The western limit of privately-owned beach property, the approximate location of mean high tide (MHT), at the time Washington achieved statehood in 1889. Also termed The 1889 Line or the Western Upland Boundary, or simply the 1889 Line. DEFLATION PLAIN: The low area between the foredune and old dune ridge, where the foredune blocks the deposition of new sand and wind scours and erodes the surface, often down to the water table. FOREDUNE: The large, currently developing primary dune, closest to the ocean. INTERDUNAL WETLAND: Wetlands located in small interdunal depressions to extensive deflation plains behind stabilized foredunes. Interdunal wetlands are primarily fresh water; they have mineral soil; and they are groundwater dependent with seasonal fluctuations. MEAN HIGH WATER: The average of all the high water heights observed over a specific 19- year period (currently 1983 through 2001) called the National Tidal Datum Epoch. Also termed Mean High Tide. MITIGATION SEQUENCING: A step-wise approach to mitigating the impacts of an action, whereby a preferred order is taken, emphasizing avoidance of the impact The preferred order of the mitigation sequence is as follows: 1. Avoid impacts by not taking a certain action or parts of an action; 2. Minimize impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation by using appropriate technology or by taking affirmative steps to avoid or reduce impacts; 3. Rectify impacts by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment; 4. Reduce or eliminate impacts over time by preservation and maintenance operations; 5. Compensate for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments; and for any of these five approaches 6. Monitor impacts, mitigation, and compensatory mitigation projects, taking appropriate corrective measures. ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK (OHWM): On lakes, streams, and tidal water, that mark that will be found by examining the bed and banks and ascertaining where
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE ENVIRONMENTAL LEGACY of the UC NATURAL RESERVE SYSTEM This Page Intentionally Left Blank the Environmental Legacy of the Uc Natural Reserve System
    THE ENVIRONMENTAL LEGACY OF THE UC NATURAL RESERVE SYSTEM This page intentionally left blank the environmental legacy of the uc natural reserve system edited by peggy l. fiedler, susan gee rumsey, and kathleen m. wong university of california press Berkeley Los Angeles London The publisher gratefully acknowledges the generous contri- bution to this book provided by the University of California Natural Reserve System. University of California Press, one of the most distinguished university presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advancing scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. Its activities are supported by the UC Press Foundation and by philanthropic contributions from individuals and institutions. For more information, visit www.ucpress.edu. University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press, Ltd. London, England © 2013 by The Regents of the University of California Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The environmental legacy of the UC natural reserve system / edited by Peggy L. Fiedler, Susan Gee Rumsey, and Kathleen M. Wong. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-520-27200-2 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Natural areas—California. 2. University of California Natural Reserve System—History. 3. University of California (System)—Faculty. 4. Environmental protection—California. 5. Ecology—Study and teaching— California. 6. Natural history—Study and teaching—California. I. Fiedler, Peggy Lee. II. Rumsey, Susan Gee. III. Wong, Kathleen M. (Kathleen Michelle) QH76.5.C2E59 2013 333.73'1609794—dc23 2012014651 Manufactured in China 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (R 2002) (Permanence of Paper).
    [Show full text]
  • Doggin' America's Beaches
    Doggin’ America’s Beaches A Traveler’s Guide To Dog-Friendly Beaches - (and those that aren’t) Doug Gelbert illustrations by Andrew Chesworth Cruden Bay Books There is always something for an active dog to look forward to at the beach... DOGGIN’ AMERICA’S BEACHES Copyright 2007 by Cruden Bay Books All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the Publisher. Cruden Bay Books PO Box 467 Montchanin, DE 19710 www.hikewithyourdog.com International Standard Book Number 978-0-9797074-4-5 “Dogs are our link to paradise...to sit with a dog on a hillside on a glorious afternoon is to be back in Eden, where doing nothing was not boring - it was peace.” - Milan Kundera Ahead On The Trail Your Dog On The Atlantic Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Gulf Of Mexico Beaches 6 Your Dog On The Pacific Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Great Lakes Beaches 0 Also... Tips For Taking Your Dog To The Beach 6 Doggin’ The Chesapeake Bay 4 Introduction It is hard to imagine any place a dog is happier than at a beach. Whether running around on the sand, jumping in the water or just lying in the sun, every dog deserves a day at the beach. But all too often dog owners stopping at a sandy stretch of beach are met with signs designed to make hearts - human and canine alike - droop: NO DOGS ON BEACH.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Status of California Monarchs
    The Legal Status of Monarch Butterflies in California International Environmental Law Project 2012 IELP Report on Monarch Legal Status The International Environmental Law Project (IELP) is a legal clinic at Lewis & Clark Law School that works to develop, implement, and enforce international environmental law. It works on a range of issues, including wildlife conservation, climate change, and issues relating to trade and the environment. This report was written by the following people from the Lewis & Clark Law School: Jennifer Amiott, Mikio Hisamatsu, Erica Lyman, Steve Moe, Toby McCartt, Jen Smith, Emily Stein, and Chris Wold. Biological information was reviewed by the following individuals from The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation: Carly Voight, Sarina Jepsen, and Scott Hoffman Black. This report was funded by the Monarch Joint Venture and the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation. For more information, contact: Chris Wold Associate Professor of Law & Director International Environmental Law Project Lewis & Clark Law School 10015 SW Terwilliger Blvd Portland, OR 97219 USA TEL +1-503-768-6734 FX +1-503-768-6671 E-mail: [email protected] Web: law.lclark.edu/org/ielp Copyright © 2012 International Environmental Law Project and the Xerces Society Photo of overwintering monarchs (Danaus plexippus) clustering on a coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) on front cover by Carly Voight, The Xerces Society. IELP Report on Monarch Legal Status Table of Contents Executive Summary .........................................................................................................................v I. Introduction .........................................................................................................................1 II. Regulatory Authority of the California Department of Fish and Game ..............................5 III. Protection for Monarchs in California State Parks and on Other State Lands .....................6 A. Management of California State Parks ....................................................................6 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Washington Tour When You Think About the Terrific Golf in the Pacific Northwest, Southwest Washington Is a Big Part of It
    SepTeMber 2013 SouThWeST WaShIngTon Where you can play golf More than just golf to do in Southwest Washington in the SW Washington area SW Washington is a vast area There are plenty of options off the with a lot of golf courses, including golf course when visiting SW Wash- Green Mountain (right). Take a look ington, including windsurfing on the where to tee it up when you are in Columbia River. For more, please see the area. See Page 3 for the map. inside this section. Freeway golf: I-5 is loaded In Southwest Washington, there is no shortage of golf along Inter- state-5 as you drive between Olympia and Vancouver, in fact one course you can see from the freeway is Tri Moun- tain in Ridgefield (right), which has views of three different mountains. Another popular choice for freeway golfers is the Home Course (far right) in DuPont, which helped host the 2010 US Amateur. For more, see Page 2 of this section of Inside Golf. Southwest Washington Tour When you think about the terrific golf in the Pacific Northwest, Southwest Washington is a big part of it. The area is loaded with golf and offers a wide variety of courses to choose from. The Southwest Washington region stretches from Olympia west to the Pacific Ocean and south to the city of Vancouver. With some of the Pacific Northwest’s top public courses located in Southwest Washington, golf has proven to be a popular attraction. From places like Tumwater (left) to Elk Ridge Golf Course (below) at Carson Hot Springs in White Salmon, finding good golf is never a problem.
    [Show full text]
  • UC San Diego Capstone Papers
    UC San Diego Capstone Papers Title Developing a Draft Management Plan for the Dike Rock Intertidal Area Scripps Coastal Reserve, La Jolla, California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4c57b1bc Author Som, Marina Publication Date 2015-04-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California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
    [Show full text]
  • Jenner Visitor Center Sonoma Coast State Beach Docent Manual
    CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS Jenner Visitor Center Sonoma Coast State Beach Docent Manual Developed by Stewards of the Coast & Redwoods Russian River District State Park Interpretive Association Jenner Visitor Center Docent Program California State Parks/Russian River District 25381 Steelhead Blvd, PO Box 123, Duncans Mills, CA 95430 (707) 865-2391, (707) 865-2046 (FAX) Stewards of the Coast and Redwoods (Stewards) PO Box 2, Duncans Mills, CA 95430 (707) 869-9177, (707) 869-8252 (FAX) [email protected], www.stewardsofthecoastandredwoods.org Stewards Executive Director Michele Luna Programs Manager Sukey Robb-Wilder State Park VIP Coordinator Mike Wisehart State Park Cooperating Association Liaison Greg Probst Sonoma Coast State Park Staff: Supervising Rangers Damien Jones Jeremy Stinson Supervising Lifeguard Tim Murphy Rangers Ben Vanden Heuvel Lexi Jones Trish Nealy Cover & Design Elements: Chris Lods Funding for this program is provided by the Fisherman’s Festival Allocation Committee, Copyright © 2004 Stewards of the Coast and Redwoods Acknowledgement page updated February 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents 1 Part I The California State Park System and Volunteers The California State Park System 4 State Park Rules and Regulations 5 Role and Function of Volunteers in the State Park System 8 Volunteerism Defined 8 Volunteer Standards 9 Interpretive Principles 11 Part II Russian River District State Park Information Quick Reference to Neighboring Parks 13 Sonoma Coast State Beach Information 14 Sonoma Coast Beach Safety 17 Tide Pooling
    [Show full text]
  • Introduced Aquatic Species in California Open Coastal Waters -2007
    INTRODUCED AQUATIC SPECIES IN CALIFORNIA OPEN COASTAL WATERS -2007 Final Report September 2008 California Department of Fish and Game Office of Spill Prevention and Response Moss Landing Marine Laboratories Marine Pollution Studies Laboratory 1 AUTHORS Erin R. Maloney, Russell Fairey, Ashleigh Lyman, Zea Walton, Marco Sigala Moss Landing Marine Laboratories/Marine Pollution Studies Laboratory This report should be cited as: Maloney, E., Fairey, R., Lyman, A., Walton, Z., Sigala, M. 2007. Introduced Aquatic Species in California’s Open Coastal Waters - 2007. Final Report. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA., 84 pp. 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was completed thanks to the efforts of the following individuals: California Department of Fish and Game: Project Management and Reporting Steve Foss, Michael Sowby, Peter Ode San Jose State University Foundation- Moss Landing Marine Laboratories Marine Pollution Studies Laboratory: Project oversight, field sampling, literature review and data analysis: Russell Fairey, Erin Maloney, Ashleigh Lyman, Mark Pranger, Marco Sigala, Cassandra Lamerdin, Zea Walton, Paul Tompkins, Kim Quaranta, Aurora Alifano, Selena McMillan, Jon Walsh, Jason Felton, Lewis Barnett, Vince Christian. Marine Benthic Ecology Laboratory: Project oversight, training, sample transfer, sorting and gross taxonomy, data entry: Aurora Alifano, Stepheni Ceperley, Cori Gibble, Kamille Hammerstrom, Andy Hansen, Scott Hansen, Brian Hoover, Erin Jensen, Jim Oakden, John Oliver, Sierra Perry, Jasmine Ruvalcaba, Jared
    [Show full text]
  • Mackerricher State Park 24100 Mackerricher Park Road (Off Hwy
    Our Mission The mission of California State Parks is to provide for the health, inspiration and ild harbor seals MacKerricher education of the people of California by helping W to preserve the state’s extraordinary biological State Park diversity, protecting its most valued natural and sun offshore while cultural resources, and creating opportunities for high-quality outdoor recreation. scores of shorebirds forage in mounds of beached kelp at these pristine beaches and California State Parks supports equal access. secluded coves. Prior to arrival, visitors with disabilities who need assistance should contact the park at (707) 937-5804. If you need this publication in an alternate format, contact [email protected]. CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 For information call: (800) 777-0369 (916) 653-6995, outside the U.S. 711, TTY relay service www.parks.ca.gov MacKerricher State Park 24100 MacKerricher Park Road (off Hwy. 1) Fort Bragg, CA 95437 (707) 937-5804 © 2002 California State Parks (Rev. 2017) M acKerricher State Park’s wild beauty, PLANT COMMUNITIES diverse habitats, and moderate climate The lake area and campgrounds host a forest make this special place on the Mendocino of Bishop and shore pine, Douglas-fir, and Coast a gem among California’s state parks. other types of vegetation that thrive in the Watch harbor seals and migrating gray favorable soil and climate. Dunes topped with whales, stroll on secluded beaches, bicycle sand verbena, sea rocket, sand primrose, beach along an old seaside logging road, and find morning-glory, and grasses produce a palette of yellows, reds, and greens rolling gently across solitude on one of Northern California’s most Inglenook Fen-Ten Mile Dunes Natural Preserve pristine stretches of sand dunes.
    [Show full text]
  • Chorizanthe Howellii (Howell's Spineflower) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arcata Fish A
    Chorizanthe howellii (Howell’s spineflower) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Chorizanthe howellii: MacKerricher State Park, California Photograph utilized courtesy Peter Warner, Fort Bragg, California U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office Arcata, California December 2011 5-YEAR REVIEW Chorizanthe howellii (Howell’s spineflower) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act to conduct a status review of each listed species at least once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5-year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species, be changed in status from endangered to threatened, or be changed in status from threatened to endangered. Our original listing of a species as endangered or threatened is based on the existence of threats attributable to one or more of the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Endangered Species Act, and we must consider these same five factors in any subsequent consideration of reclassification or delisting of a species. In the 5-year review, we consider the best available scientific and commercial data on the species, and focus on new information available since the species was listed or last reviewed. If we recommend a change in listing status based on the results of the 5-year review, we must propose to do so through a separate rule-making process defined in the Endangered Species Act that includes public review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Preserving the Fort Ross Archaeological Record]
    PRESERVING THE FORT ROSS ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD] E. Breck Parkman 2560 Meier Road Sebastopol, CA 95472 ABSTRACT A major archaeological program is currently under way at Fort Ross State Historic Park, located on California's North Coast. The two major aspects of the program concern the Native Alaskan Village site and the Russian Orthodox Cemetery. Traditionally, little has been known about either the Village or Cemetery, and this lack of understanding has made their protection more difficult. It is the author's contention that the Fort Ross archaeological resources must be made more visible if they are to be preserved. This paper, then, is a discussion of the rationale behind the program's implementation. INTRODUCTION the California Department ofParks and Rec­ reation (hereafter, DPR). Naturally, these goals Fort Ross State Historic Park (hereafter, pertain to archaeological sites as well as other FRSHP), located on the Sonoma County coast in kinds of cultural resources. Archaeological northern California, is an internationally-signifi­ preservation, or, perhaps more accurately, "con­ cant historic resource (see Farris 1989: Lightfoot servation," is accomplished by the DPR to a et al. 1991). The park contains numerous archae­ relatively high degree, in comparison to other ological sites, many of them associated with the public land stewards. However, the interpretation Russian-American Fur Company's 1812-1841 of the archaeological record is only occasionally outpost, "Colony Ross." Currently, a major undertaken. Those projects recently conducted at scientific undertaking, known as the Fort Ross FRSHP serve as examples of how both interpreta­ Archaeological Project, is underway at FRSHP. tion and preservation can be realized, and how the The project is being conducted under the direction former might positively affect the success of the ofDr.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific County, Washington and Incorporated Areas
    PACIFIC COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ILWACO, TOWN OF 530127 LONG BEACH, TOWN OF 530128 PACIFIC COUNTY, 530126 UNINCORPORATED AREAS RAYMOND, CITY OF 530129 SHOALWATER BAY INDIAN TRIBE 530341 SOUTH BEND, CITY OF 530130 Pacific County PRELIMINARY: AUGUST 30, 2013 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 53049CV000A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panels for this community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map (FBFM) panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone(s) New Zone Al through A30 AE B X C X Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: To Be Determined TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose of Study ................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments ...................................................................... 1 1.3 Coordination .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State's Scenic Byways & Road Trips
    waShington State’S Scenic BywayS & Road tRipS inSide: Road Maps & Scenic drives planning tips points of interest 2 taBLe of contentS waShington State’S Scenic BywayS & Road tRipS introduction 3 Washington State’s Scenic Byways & Road Trips guide has been made possible State Map overview of Scenic Byways 4 through funding from the Federal Highway Administration’s National Scenic Byways Program, Washington State Department of Transportation and aLL aMeRican RoadS Washington State Tourism. waShington State depaRtMent of coMMeRce Chinook Pass Scenic Byway 9 director, Rogers Weed International Selkirk Loop 15 waShington State touRiSM executive director, Marsha Massey nationaL Scenic BywayS Marketing Manager, Betsy Gabel product development Manager, Michelle Campbell Coulee Corridor 21 waShington State depaRtMent of tRanSpoRtation Mountains to Sound Greenway 25 Secretary of transportation, Paula Hammond director, highways and Local programs, Kathleen Davis Stevens Pass Greenway 29 Scenic Byways coordinator, Ed Spilker Strait of Juan de Fuca - Highway 112 33 Byway leaders and an interagency advisory group with representatives from the White Pass Scenic Byway 37 Washington State Department of Transportation, Washington State Department of Agriculture, Washington State Department of Fish & Wildlife, Washington State Tourism, Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission and State Scenic BywayS Audubon Washington were also instrumental in the creation of this guide. Cape Flattery Tribal Scenic Byway 40 puBLiShing SeRviceS pRovided By deStination
    [Show full text]