Clinical Review Hyon Kwon, Pharmd, MPH Snda 208751/S-010 and S-011 Fiasp (Insulin Aspart)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Clinical Review Hyon Kwon, Pharmd, MPH Snda 208751/S-010 and S-011 Fiasp (Insulin Aspart) Clinical Review Hyon Kwon, PharmD, MPH sNDA 208751/S-010 and S-011 Fiasp (insulin aspart) CLINICAL REVIEW Application Type Efficacy supplement Application Number(s) sNDA 208751/S-10 and S-11 Priority or Standard Standard Submit Date(s) February 21, 2019 Received Date(s) February 21, 2019 PDUFA Goal Date December 21, 2019 Division/Office Division of Metabolism and Endocrinology Products (DMEP) Reviewer Name(s) Hyon Kwon, PharmD, MPH Review Completion Date Established/Proper Name Insulin aspart (Proposed) Trade Name Fiasp Applicant Novo Nordisk Dosage Form(s) Injection, 100 units/mL (U-100): 10 mL multiple-dose vial, 3 mL pen, 3 mL cartridges for use in a cartridge device Applicant Proposed Dosing Individualized Regimen(s) Applicant Proposed To improve glycemic control in children with diabetes mellitus Indication(s)/Population(s) Recommendation on Approval Regulatory Action Recommended Not applicable Indication(s)/Population(s) (if applicable) 1 Reference ID: 4533564 Clinical Review Hyon Kwon, PharmD, MPH sNDA 208751/S-010 and S-011 Fiasp (insulin aspart) Table of Contents Glossary ........................................................................................................................................... 7 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 9 Product Introduction ........................................................................................................ 9 Conclusions on the Substantial Evidence of Effectiveness .............................................. 9 Benefit-Risk Assessment ................................................................................................ 11 Patient Experience Data ................................................................................................. 16 2. Therapeutic Context .............................................................................................................. 17 Analysis of Condition ...................................................................................................... 17 Analysis of Current Treatment Options ......................................................................... 17 3. Regulatory Background ......................................................................................................... 19 U.S. Regulatory Actions and Marketing History ............................................................. 19 Summary of Presubmission/Submission Regulatory Activity ........................................ 19 Foreign Regulatory Actions and Marketing History ....................................................... 22 4. Significant Issues from Other Review Disciplines Pertinent to Clinical Conclusions on Efficacy and Safety................................................................................................................. 22 Office of Scientific Investigations (OSI) .......................................................................... 22 Product Quality .............................................................................................................. 23 Clinical Microbiology ...................................................................................................... 23 Nonclinical Pharmacology/Toxicology ........................................................................... 23 Clinical Pharmacology .................................................................................................... 23 Devices and Companion Diagnostic Issues .................................................................... 26 Consumer Study Reviews ............................................................................................... 26 5. Sources of Clinical Data and Review Strategy ....................................................................... 26 Table of Clinical Studies .................................................................................................. 26 Review Strategy .............................................................................................................. 28 6. Review of Relevant Individual Trials Used to Support Efficacy ............................................. 28 2 Reference ID: 4533564 Clinical Review Hyon Kwon, PharmD, MPH sNDA 208751/S-010 and S-011 Fiasp (insulin aspart) Trial NN1218-4101 – Efficacy and Safety of Faster-acting Insulin Aspart compared to NovoRapid both in Combination with Insulin Degludec in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes ................................................................................................................................. 28 Study Design............................................................................................................ 28 Study Results ........................................................................................................... 37 7. Integrated Review of Effectiveness ....................................................................................... 65 Additional Efficacy Considerations ................................................................................. 65 7.2.1. Considerations on Benefit in the Postmarket Setting ............................................ 65 Other Relevant Benefits .......................................................................................... 66 Integrated Assessment of Effectiveness ........................................................................ 66 8. Review of Safety .................................................................................................................... 67 Safety Review Approach ................................................................................................ 67 Review of the Safety Database ...................................................................................... 67 Overall Exposure ..................................................................................................... 67 Relevant characteristics of the safety population: ................................................. 68 Adequacy of the safety database: .......................................................................... 68 Adequacy of Applicant’s Clinical Safety Assessments .................................................... 68 Issues Regarding Data Integrity and Submission Quality ....................................... 68 Categorization of Adverse Events ........................................................................... 68 Routine Clinical Tests .............................................................................................. 71 Safety Results ................................................................................................................. 72 Deaths ..................................................................................................................... 72 Serious Adverse Events ........................................................................................... 72 Dropouts and/or Discontinuations Due to Adverse Effects ................................... 74 Significant Adverse Events - Hypoglycemia ............................................................ 74 Treatment Emergent Adverse Events and Adverse Reactions ............................... 82 Laboratory Findings ................................................................................................ 83 Vital Signs ................................................................................................................ 83 Electrocardiograms (ECGs) ...................................................................................... 84 QT ............................................................................................................................ 84 Immunogenicity ............................................................................................... 84 3 Reference ID: 4533564 Clinical Review Hyon Kwon, PharmD, MPH sNDA 208751/S-010 and S-011 Fiasp (insulin aspart) Analysis of Submission-Specific Safety Issues ................................................................ 84 Injection Site Reactions ........................................................................................... 84 Lipodystrophy ......................................................................................................... 86 Allergic Reaction ..................................................................................................... 86 Safety Analyses by Demographic Subgroups ................................................................. 87 Specific Safety Studies/Clinical Trials ............................................................................. 87 Additional Safety Explorations ....................................................................................... 87 Human Carcinogenicity or Tumor Development .................................................... 87 Human Reproduction and Pregnancy ..................................................................... 88 Pediatrics and Assessment of Effects on Growth ................................................... 88 Overdose, Drug Abuse Potential, Withdrawal, and Rebound ................................ 90 Safety in the Postmarket Setting.................................................................................... 90 Safety Concerns Identified Through Postmarket Experience ................................. 90 Expectations on Safety in the Postmarket Setting ................................................
Recommended publications
  • Exenatide QW: a New Treatment Option for Type 2 Diabetes Offering Ease of Use, Improved Efficacy, and Reduced Side Effects
    FEATURE ARTICLE Commentary: Exenatide QW: A New Treatment Option for Type 2 Diabetes Offering Ease of Use, Improved Efficacy, and Reduced Side Effects Charles F. Shaefer, Jr., MD Editor’s note: Once-weekly exenatide, (also called incretin mimetics) cur- with GLP-1 receptor agonists is the which has recently been approved for rently in use.3,4 only form of anti-diabetes therapy patients with type 2 diabetes, has great Validation of the acceptance offering proven weight loss. Finally, potential as a new diabetes therapy in clinical practice of GLP-1 GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy is in the primary care setting. This receptor agonists can be found in one of the recommended treatment commentary and the feature article that the recently released American strategies offering a low incidence of follows it (p. 95) offer an overview of Diabetes Association (ADA)/ hypoglycemia, an important aspect this new therapeutic tool and important European Association for the Study of diabetes therapy learned from the insights about its clinical utility. In the of Diabetes (EASD) position state- Action to Control Cardiovascular interest of transparency, however, we ment on the management of type 2 Risk in Diabetes trial.6 want to point out that the authors of diabetes, which placed these drugs As clinicians consider what to do both articles are affiliated with Amylin alongside older, well-accepted agents when metformin and lifestyle change Pharmaceuticals, which manufactures such as sulfonylureas (SUs) and do not adequately control a patient’s exenatide QW and markets it under the thiozolidinediones (TZDs) as a sec- A1C, they frequently ask, “incretin 5 trade name Bydureon.
    [Show full text]
  • GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
    Cognitive Vitality Reports® are reports written by neuroscientists at the Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF). These scientific reports include analysis of drugs, drugs-in- development, drug targets, supplements, nutraceuticals, food/drink, non-pharmacologic interventions, and risk factors. Neuroscientists evaluate the potential benefit (or harm) for brain health, as well as for age-related health concerns that can affect brain health (e.g., cardiovascular diseases, cancers, diabetes/metabolic syndrome). In addition, these reports include evaluation of safety data, from clinical trials if available, and from preclinical models. GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Evidence Summary GLP-1 agonists are beneficial for patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity. Some evidence suggests benefits for Alzheimer’s disease. It is unclear whether it is beneficial for individuals without underlying metabolic disease. Semaglutide seems to be most effective for metabolic dysfunction, though liraglutide has more preclinical data for Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroprotective Benefit: Evidence from many preclinical studies and a pilot biomarker study suggest some neuroprotective benefits with GLP-1 agonists. However, whether they may be beneficial for everyone or only a subset of individuals (e.g. diabetics) is unclear. Aging and related health concerns: GLP-1 agonists are beneficial for treating diabetes and cardiovascular complications relating to diabetes. It is not clear whether they have beneficial effects in otherwise healthy individuals. Safety: GLP-1 agonists are generally safe for most people with minor side effects. However, long-term side effects are not known. 1 Availability: Available Dose: Varies - see Chemical formula: C172H265N43O51 (Liraglutide) as a prescription chart at the end of MW: 3751.262 g/mol medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus
    TREATMENT OF DIABETES MELLITUS DIABETES is a condition that affects how the body makes energy from food. Food is broken down into sugar (glucose) in the body and released into the blood. When the blood sugar level rises after a meal, insulin responds to let the sugar into the cells to be used as energy. In diabetes, the body either does not make enough insulin or it stops responding to insulin as well as it should. This results in sugar staying in the blood and leads to serious health problems over time. DIAGNOSIS OF DIABETES1 • A1C Test: Lab test measuring average blood sugar over past two to three months • Fasting Blood Sugar Test: Lab test measuring blood sugar after eight hours of no food or drink • Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT): Measures blood sugar before and two hours after drinking a specific sugary liquid • Random Blood Sugar Test: Measures blood sugar at a moment in time, without any kind of preparation (like fasting) FASTING BLOOD ORAL GLUCOSE TOLERANCE RANDOM BLOOD RESULT A1C TEST SUGAR TEST TEST SUGAR TEST Diabetes ≥ 6.5% ≥126 mg/dL ≥ 200 mg/dL ≥ 200 mg/dL Prediabetes 5.7 – 6.4% 100 – 125 mg/dL 140 – 199 mg/dL N/A Normal < 5.7% ≤99 mg/dL < 140 mg/dL N/A NON-DRUG TREATMENTS2 THERAPY COST WHAT TO EXPECT Diet (Mediterranean diet) and exercise (30 minutes a day, five days a week of moderate- Weight loss $-$$ intensity exercise); 7% weight loss decreases risk of diabetes3 Psychological intervention $$-$$$ Psychotherapy may reduce diabetic distress and improve glycemic control4,5 nationalcooperativerx.com PRESCRIPTION TREATMENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Insulin Aspart Sanofi, If It Is Coloured Or It Has Solid Pieces in It
    ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS 1 This medicinal product is subject to additional monitoring. This will allow quick identification of new safety information. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions. See section 4.8 for how to report adverse reactions. 1. NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT Insulin aspart Sanofi 100 units/ml solution for injection in vial Insulin aspart Sanofi 100 units/ml solution for injection in cartridge Insulin aspart Sanofi 100 units/ml solution for injection in pre-filled pen 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION One ml solution contains 100 units insulin aspart* (equivalent to 3.5 mg). Insulin aspart Sanofi 100 units/ml solution for injection in vial Each vial contains 10 ml equivalent to 1,000 units insulin aspart. Insulin aspart Sanofi 100 units/ml solution for injection in cartridge Each cartridge contains 3 ml equivalent to 300 units insulin aspart. Insulin aspart Sanofi 100 units/ml solution for injection in pre-filled pen Each pre-filled pen contains 3 ml equivalent to 300 units insulin aspart. Each pre-filled pen delivers 1-80 units in steps of 1 unit. *produced in Escherichia coli by recombinant DNA technology. For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Solution for injection (injection). Clear, colourless, aqueous solution. 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 Therapeutic indications Insulin aspart Sanofi is indicated for the treatment of diabetes mellitus in adults, adolescents and children aged 1 year and above. 4.2 Posology and method of administration Posology The potency of insulin analogues, including insulin aspart, is expressed in units, whereas the potency of human insulin is expressed in international units.
    [Show full text]
  • Think Medicines!
    Think Issue 13 August 2016 MHRA Drug Safety SGLT2 inhibitors: updated advice on the risk of diabetic Medicines!Updates can be found ketoacidosis (DKA) at the following link. The MHRA are advising health care professionals to test for raised ketones in patients with ketoacidosis symptoms, who are taking SGLT2 inhibitors even if New higher strength Humalog® plasma glucose levels are near-normal. SGLT2 inhibitors include: Canagliflozin, 200 units/ml KwikPen™ Dapagliflozin and Empagliflozin. Serious, life-threatening, and fatal cases of In order to minimize medication DKA have been reported in patients taking an SGLT2 inhibitor. In several cases, errors. blood glucose levels were only moderately elevated (e.g. <14mmol/L) Insulin lispro 200 units/ml representing an atypical presentation for DKA, which could delay diagnosis and solution for injection should treatment. ONLY be administered using the Advice for health Care Professionals: Humalog 200 units/ml pre-filled Inform patients of the signs of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and advise them to pen (KwikPen). seek immediate medical advice if they develop any of these symptoms (e.g. When switching from one rapid weight loss, feeling sick or being sick, stomach pain, fast and deep Humalog strength to another, breathing, sleepiness, a sweet smell to the breath, a sweet or metallic taste in the dose does not need to be the mouth, or a different odour to urine or sweat). converted. Unnecessary dose Discuss the risk factors of DKA with patients. conversion may lead to under/ Discontinue treatment with the SGLT2 inhibitor immediately if DKA is over dosing and resultant hyper/ suspected or diagnosed.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Material
    Supplementary material Table S1. Search strategy performed on the following databases: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). 1. Randomi*ed study OR random allocation OR Randomi*ed controlled trial OR Random* Control* trial OR RCT Epidemiological study 2. sodium glucose cotransporter 2 OR sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor* OR sglt2 inhibitor* OR empagliflozin OR dapagliflozin OR canagliflozin OR ipragliflozin OR tofogliflozin OR ertugliflozin OR sotagliflozin OR sergliflozin OR remogliflozin 3. 1 AND 2 1 Table S2. Safety outcomes of empagliflozin and linagliptin combination therapy compared with empagliflozin or linagliptin monotherapy in treatment naïve type 2 diabetes patients Safety outcome Comparator 1 Comparator 2 I2 RR [95% CI] Number of events Number of events / / total subjects total subjects i. Empagliflozin + linagliptin vs empagliflozin monotherapy Empagliflozin + Empagliflozin linagliptin monotherapy ≥ 1 AE(s) 202/272 203/270 77% 0.99 [0.81, 1.21] ≥ 1 drug-related 37/272 38/270 0% 0.97 [0.64, 1.47] AE(s) ≥ 1 serious AE(s) 13/272 19/270 0% 0.68 [0.34, 1.35] Hypoglycaemia* 0/272 5/270 0% 0.18 [0.02, 1.56] UTI 32/272 25/270 29% 1.28 [0.70, 2.35] Events suggestive 12/272 13/270 9% 0.92 [0.40, 2.09] of genital infection i. Empagliflozin + linagliptin vs linagliptin monotherapy Empagliflozin + Linagliptin linagliptin monotherapy ≥ 1 AE(s) 202/272 97/135 0% 1.03 [0.91, 1.17] ≥ 1 drug-related 37/272 17/135 0% 1.08 [0.63, 1.84] AE(s) ≥ 1 serious AE(s) 13/272 2/135 0% 3.22 [0.74, 14.07] Hypoglycaemia* 0/272 1/135 NA 0.17 [0.01, 4.07] UTI 32/272 12/135 0% 1.32 [0.70, 2.49] Events suggestive 12/272 4/135 0% 1.45 [0.47, 4.47] of genital infection RR, relative risk; AE, adverse event; UTI, urinary tract infection.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Appraisal of the Role of Insulin Analogues in the Management of Diabetes Mellitus Ralph Oiknine, Marla Bernbaum and Arshag D
    Drugs 2005; 65 (3): 325-340 REVIEW ARTICLE 0012-6667/05/0003-0325/$39.95/0 2005 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved. A Critical Appraisal of the Role of Insulin Analogues in the Management of Diabetes Mellitus Ralph Oiknine, Marla Bernbaum and Arshag D. Mooradian Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Diabetes, and Metabolism, St Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA Contents Abstract ....................................................................................325 1. Physiology of Insulin Secretion .............................................................326 2. Conventional Insulin Preparations ..........................................................327 3. Insulin Analogues ........................................................................328 3.1 Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogues .......................................................328 3.1.1 Insulin Lispro ...................................................................328 3.1.2 Insulin Aspart ..................................................................329 3.1.3 Insulin Glulisine .................................................................329 3.1.4 Clinical Utility of Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogues ...................................330 3.2 Premixed Insulins and Insulin Analogues ................................................331 3.3 Basal Insulin Analogues ...............................................................331 3.3.1 Insulin Glargine ................................................................331
    [Show full text]
  • Steglujan, INN-Ertugliflozin-Sitagliptin
    25 January 2018 EMA/86941/2018 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Assessment report Steglujan International non-proprietary name: ertugliflozin / sitagliptin Procedure No. EMEA/H/C/004313/0000 Note Assessment report as adopted by the CHMP with all information of a commercially confidential nature deleted. 30 Churchill Place ● Canary Wharf ● London E14 5EU ● United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 3660 6000 Facsimile +44 (0)20 3660 5555 Send a question via our website www.ema.europa.eu/contact An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2018. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Table of contents 1. Background information on the procedure .............................................. 7 1.1. Submission of the dossier ...................................................................................... 7 1.2. Steps taken for the assessment of the product ......................................................... 8 2. Scientific discussion ................................................................................ 9 2.1. Problem statement ............................................................................................... 9 2.1.1. Disease or condition ........................................................................................... 9 2.1.2. Epidemiology .................................................................................................... 9 2.1.3. Clinical presentation ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IHS PROVIDER September 2017
    September 2017 Volume 42 Number 9 Indian Health Service National Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee SGLT-2 inhibitors (Update) NPTC Formulary Brief August Meeting 2017 Background: The FDA has currently approved three SGLT-2 inhibitors, two of which have completed FDA-mandated cardiovascular outcomes trials. Last year, in the Empagliflozin Cardiovascular Outcome Event Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients (EMPA-REG), empagliflozin not only reduced cardiovascular events, but also mortality.1 This year, the Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) demonstrated equivocal cardiovascular benefits, no mortality benefit, and significant harms in those receiving canagliflozin.2 The DECLARE-TIMI 58 cardiovascular study of dapagliflozin will be completed in April 2019 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01730534). Uncertainty remains regarding the current data, long- term benefits and harms, and differentiation among SGLT-2 inhibitors. Following a review of SGLT2 inhibitors at the August 2017 NPTC meeting on their cardiovascular outcomes, net benefit and place in therapy, no modifications were made to the National Core Formulary (NCF). Discussion: EMPA-REG enrolled 7,020 patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and HgbA1c values between 7.0-10.0%. All patients had established cardiovascular disease (CVD) and were observed for a median duration of 3.1 years. Empagliflozin reduced the primary outcome of cardiovascular (CV) death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or nonfatal cardiovascular accident (CVA) by 6.5 events per 1000 patient-years (pt-yrs). Mortality decreased by 9.2 events per 1000 pt-yrs, primarily driven by a reduction in CV mortality of 7.8 events per 1000 pt-yrs. Heart failure hospitalization decreased by 5.1 events per 1000 pt-yrs.
    [Show full text]
  • TRULICITY, INN-Dulaglutide
    ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS 1 1. NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT Trulicity 0.75 mg solution for injection in pre-filled pen Trulicity 1.5 mg solution for injection in pre-filled pen Trulicity 3 mg solution for injection in pre-filled pen Trulicity 4.5 mg solution for injection in pre-filled pen 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION Trulicity 0.75 mg solution for injection in pre-filled pen Each pre-filled pen contains 0.75 mg of dulaglutide* in 0.5 ml solution. Trulicity 1.5 mg solution for injection in pre-filled pen Each pre-filled pen contains 1.5 mg of dulaglutide* in 0.5 ml solution. Trulicity 3 mg solution for injection in pre-filled pen Each pre-filled pen contains 3 mg of dulaglutide* in 0.5 ml solution. Trulicity 4.5 mg solution for injection in pre-filled pen Each pre-filled pen contains 4.5 mg of dulaglutide* in 0.5 ml solution. *produced in CHO cells by recombinant DNA technology. For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Solution for injection. Clear, colourless solution. 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 Therapeutic indications Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Trulicity is indicated for the treatment of adults with insufficiently controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus as an adjunct to diet and exercise • as monotherapy when metformin is considered inappropriate due to intolerance or contraindications • in addition to other medicinal products for the treatment of diabetes. For study results with respect to combinations, effects on glycaemic control and cardiovascular events, and the populations studied, see sections 4.4, 4.5 and 5.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Step Therapy
    UnitedHealthcare Pharmacy Clinical Pharmacy Programs Program Number 2020 P 3086-9 Program Step Therapy – Diabetes Medications - SGLT2 Inhibitors Medication Farxiga (dapagliflozin)*, Glyxambi (empagliflozin/linagliptan), Invokana (canagliflozin)*, Invokamet (canagliflozin/metformin)*, Invokamet XR (canaglifloxin/metformin extended-release)*, Jardiance (empagliflozin), Qtern (dapagliflozin/saxagliptin)*, Segluromet (ertugliflozin/metformin)*, Steglatro (ertugliflozin)*, Steglujan (ertugliflozin/sitagliptin)*, Xigduo XR (dapagliflozin/metformin extended-release)* P&T Approval Date 10/2016, 10/2017, 4/2018, 8/2018, 12/2018, 2/2019, 2/2020, 5/2020; 7/2020 Effective Date 10/1/2020; Oxford only: 10/1/2020 1. Background: Farxiga (dapagliflozin)*, Invokana (canagliflozin)*, Jardiance (empagliflozin) and Steglatro (ertugliflozin)* are sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Farxiga*, Invokana* and Jardiance have additional indications. Farxiga* is indicated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure in adults with heart failure (NYHA class II-IV) with reduced ejection fraction. Invokana* is indicated to reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction and nonfatal stroke) in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and established cardiovascular disease (CVD), and to reduce the risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), doubling of
    [Show full text]
  • Steglujan (Ertugliflozin/Sitagliptin), Segluromet
    Steglatro™ (ertugliflozin), Steglujan™ (ertugliflozin/sitagliptin), Segluromet™ (ertugliflozin/metformin) – New drug approval • On December 19, 2017, the FDA approved Merck’s Steglatro (ertugliflozin), Steglujan (ertugliflozin/sitagliptin), and Segluromet (ertugliflozin/metformin) as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). — Steglujan is indicated when treatment with both ertugliflozin and sitagliptin is appropriate. — Segluromet is indicated when patients are not adequately controlled on a regimen containing ertugliflozin or metformin, or in patients who are already treated with both ertugliflozin and metformin. — These drugs are not recommended in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) or for the treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis. — Steglujan has not been studied in patients with a history of pancreatitis. It is unknown whether patients with a history of pancreatitis are at increased risk for the development of pancreatitis while using Steglujan. • Ertugliflozin is the fourth sodium-glucose co-transoporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor approved by the FDA. Other marketed SGLT2 inhibitors include Jardiance® (empagliflozin), Farxiga® (dapagliflozin), and Invokana® (canagliflozin). • The efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin were evaluated in multiple clinical studies involving patients with T2DM. Ertugliflozin was studied as monotherapy and in combination with metformin and/or a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor. Ertugliflozin was also studied in combination with other antidiabetic medications, including insulin and a sulfonylurea, and in T2DM patients with moderate renal impairment. — In patients with T2DM, treatment with ertugliflozin, ertugliflozin + sitagliptin, and ertugliflozin + metformin reduced hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) vs. placebo or the active comparator. — In patients with T2DM and moderate renal impairment, treatment with ertugliflozin did not result in a reduction in HbA1c vs.
    [Show full text]