Crevasse Patterns and the Strain-Rate Tensor: a High-Resolution Comparison

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Crevasse Patterns and the Strain-Rate Tensor: a High-Resolution Comparison University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Geosciences Faculty Publications Geosciences 1998 Crevasse patterns and the strain-rate tensor: a high-resolution comparison Joel T. Harper University of Montana - Missoula, [email protected] Neil Humphrey University of Wyoming W. Tad Pfeffer University of Colorado Boulder Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/geosci_pubs Part of the Glaciology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Harper, Joel T.; Humphrey, Neil; and Pfeffer, W. Tad, "Crevasse patterns and the strain-rate tensor: a high- resolution comparison" (1998). Geosciences Faculty Publications. 37. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/geosci_pubs/37 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Geosciences at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geosciences Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JournalojGlaciology, Vo!. 44, No. 146, 1998 Crevasse patterns and the strain-rate tensor: a high-resolution comparison 2 J. T. HARPER,i N. F. HUMPHREY,I W. T. PFEFFER IDepartment ojGeology and Geophysics, University ojT!lYoming, Laramie, TiJYoming 82071, US.A. 2Jnstitute oj Arctic and Alpine Research, University ojColorado, Bouldel; Colorado 80309, US.A. ABSTRACT. Values of the strain-rate tensor represented at a 20 m length scale a re found to ex plain the pattern and orientation of crevasses in a 0.13 km 2 reach of Worthing­ ton Glacier, Alaska, U.S.A. The flow fi eld of the reach is constructed from surveyed dis­ placements of 110 markers spaced 20- 30 m apart. A velocity gradient m ethod is then used to calcul ate values of the principal strain-rate axes at the nodes of a 20 m x 20 m ortho­ gonal grid. Crevasses in the study reach are of two types, splaying and transverse, and are everywhere normal to the trajectories of greatest (most tensile) principal strain ra te. Splaying crevasses exist where the longitudinal strain rate (Ex ) is :'S 0 and transverse cre­ vasses are present under longitudinally extending flow (i. e. Ex > 0). The orientation of cre­ vasses changes in the down-glacier direction, but the calculated rota tion by the flow field does not account for this change in orientation. Observations suggest that individual cre­ vasses represent local values of the regional flow field and are transient on the time-scale of 1- 2 years; they are not persistent features that a re translated a nd rotated by flow. Crevasse patterns are thus found to be a useful tool for mapping the strain-rate ten or in this reach of a temperate valley glacier. INTRODUCTION different flow regimes. For example, Nye (1952) described the crevasse patterns that would be expected under various Crevasses, features that are common to virtually all glaciers configurations oflateral shear and longitudinal stress. and ice shee ts, are often interpreted as an indication of ten­ While some observa tional case-studies of crevasses have sional stress in surface layers of ice. For example, the cre­ been m ade (e.g. Nye, 1952; Meier a nd others, 1957; M eier, vasses in the upper reaches of an icefall are commonly 1958; Gunn, 1964; K ehle, 1964; Holdsworth, 1969b; Col beck assumed to represent fas t and extending flow. \tVhile such and Evans, 1971; H ambrey and Mii 11 er, 1978; Hambrey and assumptions are broadly valid, glaciologists often need a others, 1980; Vornberger and Whill ans, 1990), field-based more complete description of the flow fi eld than the currenL testing of theory has been limited a nd results have been in­ understanding of crevasses allows. A better knowledge of conclusive. Previous work has been conducted at a variety of the relationship between crevasses and flow-field dynamics length scales, from measuring the strain fi eld over a few cen­ might enable quick and useful assessments of the surface timeters around a single crevasse (Colbeck and Eva ns, 1971) flow conditions to be made from these features. A rough ap­ to modeling the development of kilometer-long Antarctic praisal of the surface flow field would thus be possible for crevasses (Vornberger and Whill ans, 1990). Most fi eld regions of many glaciers and ice sheets. This paper presents studies have made comparisons of crevasse occurrence with a case-study that compares observations of crevasses and measured values of the principal strain rates. A review of detailed measurements of the flow fi eld as a means ofinves­ nearly all published fi eld measurements by Vaughan (1993) tigating the relationship between crevassing and the strain­ found that the thermal activation energies for creep and fail­ rate tenso r. ure appear to be closely related, although no systematic var­ The problem of crevassing has been addressed by theo­ iation with tensile strength was found. Other workers have retical, laboratory, and field-based observational studies. At suggested a value of 0.01 a I as the critical level of ex tending a small scale, work such as that by Rist and Murrell (1994) strain rate for the formation of new crevasses in temperate and Rist and others (1994) has examined the orientation of ice (e.g. Meier, 1958; Holdsworth, 1969a). This, however, brittle fractures a nd microcracks in stressed polycrystalline has not been well establi shed, as H a mbrey and Mi.iller ice. Various workers have addressed the larger-scale (1978) found new crevasses opening over values ranging problem of crevasse formation in glaciers with force-balance from 0.004 to 0.163 a I. considerati ons. Much of this work has fo cused on the fr ac­ In addition to the uncertainties associated with crevasse ture mechanics controlling the spacing and penetration initiation, other questions remain about the relationship depth of crevasses (e.g. Loewe, 1955; Nye, 1955; Robin, 1974; between crevassing a nd flow dynamics. In particular, rela­ Smith, 1976; \"'eertman, 1977; Nemat-Nasser and others, 1979; tively little research has been directed toward the develop­ Sassolas and others, 1996). Still other work has addressed the ment of crevasse fi elds. Does an array of adjacent crevasses theoretical patterns of crevasse families associated with represent various stages in the life cyele of a crevasse as it is 68 Harper and others: Crevasse patterns and strain -rate tensor translated and rotated through the fl ow fi eld? Or is each center line of the glacier to the north val ley wall. Boreholes crevasse a transient event representing only the stress condi­ drilled to the bed and ice-penetrating radar measurements tions of its current location? Nye (19 83: 75) stated, "the cre­ show that ice thickness ranges from 185 to 210 m (Welch and vasses one observes on a glacier have been carried away others, 1996). Other work on this study reach has addressed from the places where they were originally formed and have the subglacial hydrology (Stone a nd others, 1994), surface been rotated by the fl ow". For this reason, he suggested that velocity variations (H arper and others, 1996) and the char­ the trajectories of principal stress and strain rate may not acteristics of the bed and subsurface ice (Harper and Hum­ necessaril y match the crevasse pattern. H oldsworth phrey, 1995). (1969b) found that a seri es of transverse crevasses on Kaska­ wulsh Glacier, YukonTerritory, Canada, are a train with two METHODS new crevasses formed at a starting zone each year. Further­ more, Vornberger and \l\Th illans (1990) modeled the transla­ Nye (1959) pioneered a procedure for calculating the princi­ tion and rotation of splaying crevasses on Ice Stream B, pal axes of strain rate from measurements of the relative dis­ Antarctica, as individual crevasses that persist for decades placement of velocity markers. The methods for calculating and are transported tens of kilometers. Yet, open crevasses the principal axes used here are an adaptation of this certainly h ave a finite lifetime; as ice moves into a changing approach. A total of 110 point measurements of velocity are stress field existing crevasses become relict, while new ones interpolated to form a ve locity-fi eld grid. Gradients in the open. Rel ict crevasses may p ersist in the new stress regime, velocity fi eld are then used to calculate components of the may disappear by ablation or infilling with snow and refro­ strain-rate tensor at each of the grid nodes. The velocity gra­ zen meltwater, or may close by shear a nd compressional dient method h as the ad\'a ntage of rapid data coll ection and strains. The ques tions that rem ain about the life cycle of cre­ process ing, which enabl es a large sampling of the fl ow field. vasses m ay a t least in part be due to a very limited number of However, the a rea sampled by this meth od is less certain compa ri sons of crevasse fields with high spatial resolution than with techniques for direct measurement of deforma­ measurem ents of the flow field. tion wit hin "stra in elements". In this study the problem is addressed with a large obse r­ vational data set defining the surface flow fi eld at a short Velocities length scale (10- 20 m). This allows the strain-rate tensor to Surface \"C locities were measured during two summers by be calculated on a grid of densel y spaced points with hori­ repeated surveys of an array of stakes using a tota l station zontal resolution approximately equal to one-fifth of the ice theodoli te. In the first year, 46 sta kes were pl aced in the depth.
Recommended publications
  • University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan GEOLOGY of the SCOTT GLACIER and WISCONSIN RANGE AREAS, CENTRAL TRANSANTARCTIC MOUNTAINS, ANTARCTICA
    This dissertation has been /»OOAOO m icrofilm ed exactly as received MINSHEW, Jr., Velon Haywood, 1939- GEOLOGY OF THE SCOTT GLACIER AND WISCONSIN RANGE AREAS, CENTRAL TRANSANTARCTIC MOUNTAINS, ANTARCTICA. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1967 Geology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan GEOLOGY OF THE SCOTT GLACIER AND WISCONSIN RANGE AREAS, CENTRAL TRANSANTARCTIC MOUNTAINS, ANTARCTICA DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University by Velon Haywood Minshew, Jr. B.S., M.S, The Ohio State University 1967 Approved by -Adviser Department of Geology ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report covers two field seasons in the central Trans- antarctic Mountains, During this time, the Mt, Weaver field party consisted of: George Doumani, leader and paleontologist; Larry Lackey, field assistant; Courtney Skinner, field assistant. The Wisconsin Range party was composed of: Gunter Faure, leader and geochronologist; John Mercer, glacial geologist; John Murtaugh, igneous petrclogist; James Teller, field assistant; Courtney Skinner, field assistant; Harry Gair, visiting strati- grapher. The author served as a stratigrapher with both expedi­ tions . Various members of the staff of the Department of Geology, The Ohio State University, as well as some specialists from the outside were consulted in the laboratory studies for the pre­ paration of this report. Dr. George E. Moore supervised the petrographic work and critically reviewed the manuscript. Dr. J. M. Schopf examined the coal and plant fossils, and provided information concerning their age and environmental significance. Drs. Richard P. Goldthwait and Colin B. B. Bull spent time with the author discussing the late Paleozoic glacial deposits, and reviewed portions of the manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Viscoelasticity
    ENGINEERING VISCOELASTICITY David Roylance Department of Materials Science and Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139 October 24, 2001 1 Introduction This document is intended to outline an important aspect of the mechanical response of polymers and polymer-matrix composites: the field of linear viscoelasticity. The topics included here are aimed at providing an instructional introduction to this large and elegant subject, and should not be taken as a thorough or comprehensive treatment. The references appearing either as footnotes to the text or listed separately at the end of the notes should be consulted for more thorough coverage. Viscoelastic response is often used as a probe in polymer science, since it is sensitive to the material’s chemistry and microstructure. The concepts and techniques presented here are important for this purpose, but the principal objective of this document is to demonstrate how linear viscoelasticity can be incorporated into the general theory of mechanics of materials, so that structures containing viscoelastic components can be designed and analyzed. While not all polymers are viscoelastic to any important practical extent, and even fewer are linearly viscoelastic1, this theory provides a usable engineering approximation for many applications in polymer and composites engineering. Even in instances requiring more elaborate treatments, the linear viscoelastic theory is a useful starting point. 2 Molecular Mechanisms When subjected to an applied stress, polymers may deform by either or both of two fundamen- tally different atomistic mechanisms. The lengths and angles of the chemical bonds connecting the atoms may distort, moving the atoms to new positions of greater internal energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Project ICEFLOW
    ICEFLOW: short-term movements in the Cryosphere Bas Altena Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo. now at: Institute for Marine and Atmospheric research, Utrecht University. Bas Altena, project Iceflow geometric properties from optical remote sensing Bas Altena, project Iceflow Sentinel-2 Fast flow through icefall [published] Ensemble matching of repeat satellite images applied to measure fast-changing ice flow, verified with mountain climber trajectories on Khumbu icefall, Mount Everest. Journal of Glaciology. [outreach] see also ESA Sentinel Online: Copernicus Sentinel-2 monitors glacier icefall, helping climbers ascend Mount Everest Bas Altena, project Iceflow Sentinel-2 Fast flow through icefall 0 1 2 km glacier surface speed [meter/day] Khumbu Glacier 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 Mt. Everest 300 1800 1200 600 0 2/4 right 0 5/4 4/4 left 4/4 2/4 R 3/4 L -300 terrain slope [deg] Nuptse surface velocity contours Western Chm interval per 1/4 [meter/day] 10◦ 20◦ 30◦ 40◦ [outreach] see also Adventure Mountain: Mount Everest: The way the Khumbu Icefall flows Bas Altena, project Iceflow Sentinel-2 Fast flow through icefall ∆H Ut=2000 U t=2020 H internal velocity profile icefall α 2A @H 3 U = − 3+2 H tan αρgH @x MSc thesis research at Wageningen University Bas Altena, project Iceflow Quantifying precision in velocity products 557 200 557 600 7 666 200 NCC 7 666 000 score 1 7 665 800 Θ 0.5 0 7 665 600 557 460 557 480 557 500 557 520 7 665 800 search space zoom in template/chip correlation surface 7 666 200 7 666 200 7 666 000 7 666 000 7 665 800 7 665 800 7 665 600 7 665 600 557 200 557 600 557 200 557 600 [submitted] Dispersion estimation of remotely sensed glacier displacements for better error propagation.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Place-Names in Antarctica Introduced by Poland in 1978-1990
    POLISH POLAR RESEARCH 13 3-4 273-302 1992 List of place-names in Antarctica introduced by Poland in 1978-1990 The place-names listed here in alphabetical order, have been introduced to the areas of King George Island and parts of Nelson Island (West Antarctica), and the surroundings of A. B. Dobrowolski Station at Bunger Hills (East Antarctica) as the result of Polish activities in these regions during the period of 1977-1990. The place-names connected with the activities of the Polish H. Arctowski Station have been* published by Birkenmajer (1980, 1984) and Tokarski (1981). Some of them were used on the Polish maps: 1:50,000 Admiralty Bay and 1:5,000 Lions Rump. The sheet reference is to the maps 1:200,000 scale, British Antarctic Territory, South Shetland Islands, published in 1968: King George Island (sheet W 62 58) and Bridgeman Island (Sheet W 62 56). The place-names connected with the activities of the Polish A. B. Dobrowolski Station have been published by Battke (1985) and used on the map 1:5,000 Antarctic Territory — Bunger Oasis. Agat Point. 6211'30" S, 58'26" W (King George Island) Small basaltic promontory with numerous agates (hence the name), immediately north of Staszek Cove. Admiralty Bay. Sheet W 62 58. Polish name: Przylądek Agat (Birkenmajer, 1980) Ambona. 62"09'30" S, 58°29' W (King George Island) Small rock ledge, 85 m a. s. 1. {ambona, Pol. = pulpit), above Arctowski Station, Admiralty Bay, Sheet W 62 58 (Birkenmajer, 1980). Andrzej Ridge. 62"02' S, 58° 13' W (King George Island) Ridge in Rose Peak massif, Arctowski Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Rheological Nomenclature: Measurements in Ceramic Particulate Systems
    NfST Nisr National institute of Standards and Technology Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce NIST Special Publication 946 Guide to Rheological Nomenclature: Measurements in Ceramic Particulate Systems Vincent A. Hackley and Chiara F. Ferraris rhe National Institute of Standards and Technology was established in 1988 by Congress to "assist industry in the development of technology . needed to improve product quality, to modernize manufacturing processes, to ensure product reliability . and to facilitate rapid commercialization ... of products based on new scientific discoveries." NIST, originally founded as the National Bureau of Standards in 1901, works to strengthen U.S. industry's competitiveness; advance science and engineering; and improve public health, safety, and the environment. One of the agency's basic functions is to develop, maintain, and retain custody of the national standards of measurement, and provide the means and methods for comparing standards used in science, engineering, manufacturing, commerce, industry, and education with the standards adopted or recognized by the Federal Government. As an agency of the U.S. Commerce Department's Technology Administration, NIST conducts basic and applied research in the physical sciences and engineering, and develops measurement techniques, test methods, standards, and related services. The Institute does generic and precompetitive work on new and advanced technologies. NIST's research facilities are located at Gaithersburg, MD 20899, and at Boulder, CO 80303.
    [Show full text]
  • Navier-Stokes-Equation
    Math 613 * Fall 2018 * Victor Matveev Derivation of the Navier-Stokes Equation 1. Relationship between force (stress), stress tensor, and strain: Consider any sub-volume inside the fluid, with variable unit normal n to the surface of this sub-volume. Definition: Force per area at each point along the surface of this sub-volume is called the stress vector T. When fluid is not in motion, T is pointing parallel to the outward normal n, and its magnitude equals pressure p: T = p n. However, if there is shear flow, the two are not parallel to each other, so we need a marix (a tensor), called the stress-tensor , to express the force direction relative to the normal direction, defined as follows: T Tn or Tnkjjk As we will see below, σ is a symmetric matrix, so we can also write Tn or Tnkkjj The difference in directions of T and n is due to the non-diagonal “deviatoric” part of the stress tensor, jk, which makes the force deviate from the normal: jkp jk jk where p is the usual (scalar) pressure From general considerations, it is clear that the only source of such “skew” / ”deviatoric” force in fluid is the shear component of the flow, described by the shear (non-diagonal) part of the “strain rate” tensor e kj: 2 1 jk2ee jk mm jk where euujk j k k j (strain rate tensro) 3 2 Note: the funny construct 2/3 guarantees that the part of proportional to has a zero trace. The two terms above represent the most general (and the only possible) mathematical expression that depends on first-order velocity derivatives and is invariant under coordinate transformations like rotations.
    [Show full text]
  • P1616 Text-Only PDF File
    A Geologic Guide to Wrangell–Saint Elias National Park and Preserve, Alaska A Tectonic Collage of Northbound Terranes By Gary R. Winkler1 With contributions by Edward M. MacKevett, Jr.,2 George Plafker,3 Donald H. Richter,4 Danny S. Rosenkrans,5 and Henry R. Schmoll1 Introduction region—his explorations of Malaspina Glacier and Mt. St. Elias—characterized the vast mountains and glaciers whose realms he invaded with a sense of astonishment. His descrip­ Wrangell–Saint Elias National Park and Preserve (fig. tions are filled with superlatives. In the ensuing 100+ years, 6), the largest unit in the U.S. National Park System, earth scientists have learned much more about the geologic encompasses nearly 13.2 million acres of geological won­ evolution of the parklands, but the possibility of astonishment derments. Furthermore, its geologic makeup is shared with still is with us as we unravel the results of continuing tectonic contiguous Tetlin National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska, Kluane processes along the south-central Alaska continental margin. National Park and Game Sanctuary in the Yukon Territory, the Russell’s superlatives are justified: Wrangell–Saint Elias Alsek-Tatshenshini Provincial Park in British Columbia, the is, indeed, an awesome collage of geologic terranes. Most Cordova district of Chugach National Forest and the Yakutat wonderful has been the continuing discovery that the disparate district of Tongass National Forest, and Glacier Bay National terranes are, like us, invaders of a sort with unique trajectories Park and Preserve at the north end of Alaska’s panhan­ and timelines marking their northward journeys to arrive in dle—shared landscapes of awesome dimensions and classic today’s parklands.
    [Show full text]
  • Ductile Deformation - Concepts of Finite Strain
    327 Ductile deformation - Concepts of finite strain Deformation includes any process that results in a change in shape, size or location of a body. A solid body subjected to external forces tends to move or change its displacement. These displacements can involve four distinct component patterns: - 1) A body is forced to change its position; it undergoes translation. - 2) A body is forced to change its orientation; it undergoes rotation. - 3) A body is forced to change size; it undergoes dilation. - 4) A body is forced to change shape; it undergoes distortion. These movement components are often described in terms of slip or flow. The distinction is scale- dependent, slip describing movement on a discrete plane, whereas flow is a penetrative movement that involves the whole of the rock. The four basic movements may be combined. - During rigid body deformation, rocks are translated and/or rotated but the original size and shape are preserved. - If instead of moving, the body absorbs some or all the forces, it becomes stressed. The forces then cause particle displacement within the body so that the body changes its shape and/or size; it becomes deformed. Deformation describes the complete transformation from the initial to the final geometry and location of a body. Deformation produces discontinuities in brittle rocks. In ductile rocks, deformation is macroscopically continuous, distributed within the mass of the rock. Instead, brittle deformation essentially involves relative movements between undeformed (but displaced) blocks. Finite strain jpb, 2019 328 Strain describes the non-rigid body deformation, i.e. the amount of movement caused by stresses between parts of a body.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Tasman Glacier
    1 ICE DYNAMICS OF THE HAUPAPA/TASMAN GLACIER MEASURED AT HIGH SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL RESOLUTION, AORAKI/MOUNT COOK, NEW ZEALAND A THESIS Presented to the School of Geography, Environment and Earth Sciences Victoria University of Wellington In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTERS OF SCIENCE By Edmond Anderson Lui, B.Sc., GradDipEnvLaw Wellington, New Zealand October, 2016 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS SIGNATURE PAGE .................................................................................................................... TITLE PAGE ............................................................................................................................................... 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................... 2 LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................... 5 LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................................... 9 LIST OF EQUATIONS ...........................................................................................................................10 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................................11 MOTIVATIONS ........................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Strain Examples
    Lecture 14: Strain Examples GEOS 655 Tectonic Geodesy Jeff Freymueller A Worked Example Θ = e ε + ω dxˆ dxˆ • Consider this case of i ijk ( km km ) j m pure shear deformation, and two vectors dx and ⎡ 0 α 0⎤ 1 ⎢ ⎥ 0 0 dx2. How do they rotate? ε = ⎢α ⎥ • We’ll look at€ vector 1 first, ⎣⎢ 0 0 0⎦⎥ and go through each dx(2) ω = (0,0,0) component of Θ. dx(1) € (1)dx = (1,0,0) = dxˆ 1 (2)dx = (0,1,0) = dxˆ 2 € A Worked Example • First for i = 1 Θ1 = e1 jk (εkm + ωkm )dxˆ j dxˆ m • Rules for e1jk ⎡ 0 α 0⎤ – If j or k =1, e = 0 ⎢ ⎥ 1jk ε = α 0 0 – If j = k =2 or 3, e = 0 ⎢ ⎥ € 1jk ⎢ 0 0 0⎥ – This leaves j=2, k=3 and ⎣ ⎦ j=3, k=2 dx(2) ω = (0,0,0) – Both of these terms will result in zero because dx(1) • j=2,k=3: ε3m = 0 • j=3,k=2: dx3 = 0 € – True for both vectors (1)dx = (1,0,0) = dxˆ 1 (2)dx = (0,1,0) = dxˆ 2 € A Worked Example • Now for i = 2 Θ2 = e2 jk (εkm + ωkm )dxˆ j dxˆ m • Rules for e2jk ⎡ 0 α 0⎤ – If j or k =2, e = 0 ⎢ ⎥ 2jk ε = α 0 0 – If j = k =1 or 3, e = 0 ⎢ ⎥ € 2jk ⎢ 0 0 0⎥ – This leaves j=1, k=3 and ⎣ ⎦ j=3, k=1 dx(2) ω = (0,0,0) – Both of these terms will result in zero because dx(1) • j=1,k=3: ε3m = 0 • j=3,k=1: dx3 = 0 € – True for both vectors (1)dx = (1,0,0) = dxˆ 1 (2)dx = (0,1,0) = dxˆ 2 € A Worked Example • Now for i = 3 Θ3 = e3 jk (εkm + ωkm )dxˆ j dxˆ m • Rules for e 3jk ⎡ 0 α 0⎤ – Only j=1, k=2 and j=2, k=1 ⎢ ⎥ are non-zero -α ε = α 0 0 € ⎢ ⎥ • Vector 1: ⎣⎢ 0 0 0⎦⎥ ( j =1,k = 2) e dx ε dx (2) 312 1 2m m dx ω = (0,0,0) =1⋅1⋅ (α ⋅1+ 0⋅ 0 + 0⋅ 0) = α α ( j = 2,k =1) e321dx2ε1m dxm (1) = −1⋅ 0⋅ (0⋅1+ α ⋅ 0 + 0⋅ 0) = 0 dx • Vector 2: ( j =1,k = 2) e312dx1ε2m dxm € € =1⋅ 0⋅ (α ⋅ 0 + 0⋅ 0 + 0⋅ 0) = 0 (1)dx = (1,0,0) = dxˆ 1 ( j = 2,k =1) e dx ε dx 321 2 1m m (2)dx = (0,1,0) = dxˆ = −1⋅1⋅ (0⋅ 0 + α ⋅1+ 0⋅ 0) = −α 2 € € Rotation of a Line Segment • There is a general expression for the rotation of a line segment.
    [Show full text]
  • Equation of Motion for Viscous Fluids
    1 2.25 Equation of Motion for Viscous Fluids Ain A. Sonin Department of Mechanical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 2001 (8th edition) Contents 1. Surface Stress …………………………………………………………. 2 2. The Stress Tensor ……………………………………………………… 3 3. Symmetry of the Stress Tensor …………………………………………8 4. Equation of Motion in terms of the Stress Tensor ………………………11 5. Stress Tensor for Newtonian Fluids …………………………………… 13 The shear stresses and ordinary viscosity …………………………. 14 The normal stresses ……………………………………………….. 15 General form of the stress tensor; the second viscosity …………… 20 6. The Navier-Stokes Equation …………………………………………… 25 7. Boundary Conditions ………………………………………………….. 26 Appendix A: Viscous Flow Equations in Cylindrical Coordinates ………… 28 ã Ain A. Sonin 2001 2 1 Surface Stress So far we have been dealing with quantities like density and velocity, which at a given instant have specific values at every point in the fluid or other continuously distributed material. The density (rv ,t) is a scalar field in the sense that it has a scalar value at every point, while the velocity v (rv ,t) is a vector field, since it has a direction as well as a magnitude at every point. Fig. 1: A surface element at a point in a continuum. The surface stress is a more complicated type of quantity. The reason for this is that one cannot talk of the stress at a point without first defining the particular surface through v that point on which the stress acts. A small fluid surface element centered at the point r is defined by its area A (the prefix indicates an infinitesimal quantity) and by its outward v v unit normal vector n .
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Review of Stress, Linear Strain and Elastic Stress- Strain Relations
    2 Review of Stress, Linear Strain and Elastic Stress- Strain Relations 2.1 Introduction In metal forming and machining processes, the work piece is subjected to external forces in order to achieve a certain desired shape. Under the action of these forces, the work piece undergoes displacements and deformation and develops internal forces. A measure of deformation is defined as strain. The intensity of internal forces is called as stress. The displacements, strains and stresses in a deformable body are interlinked. Additionally, they all depend on the geometry and material of the work piece, external forces and supports. Therefore, to estimate the external forces required for achieving the desired shape, one needs to determine the displacements, strains and stresses in the work piece. This involves solving the following set of governing equations : (i) strain-displacement relations, (ii) stress- strain relations and (iii) equations of motion. In this chapter, we develop the governing equations for the case of small deformation of linearly elastic materials. While developing these equations, we disregard the molecular structure of the material and assume the body to be a continuum. This enables us to define the displacements, strains and stresses at every point of the body. We begin our discussion on governing equations with the concept of stress at a point. Then, we carry out the analysis of stress at a point to develop the ideas of stress invariants, principal stresses, maximum shear stress, octahedral stresses and the hydrostatic and deviatoric parts of stress. These ideas will be used in the next chapter to develop the theory of plasticity.
    [Show full text]