water Article Effects of Habitat Restoration on Fish Communities in Urban Streams Anna M. Lavelle 1,2,*, Michael A. Chadwick 1, Daniel D. A. Chadwick 3, Eleri G. Pritchard 3 and Nicolas R. Bury 4,5 1 Department of Geography, King’s College London, Bush House, North East Wing, 40 Aldwych, London WC2B 4BG, UK;
[email protected] 2 Arup Group, Rose Wharf, 78 East Street, Leeds LS9 8EE, UK 3 Environmental Change Research Centre, Department of Geography, University College London, North West Wing Building, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK;
[email protected] (D.D.A.C.);
[email protected] (E.G.P.) 4 School of Science, Technology and Engineering, University of Suffolk, Ipswich IP4 1QJ, UK;
[email protected] 5 Suffolk Sustainability Institute, University of Suffolk, Ipswich IP4 1QJ, UK * Correspondence:
[email protected] Abstract: Geomorphological alterations, hydrological disconnectivity and water pollution are among the dominant pressures affecting ecological integrity in urban streams. River restoration approaches often involve utilising in-stream structures to encourage flow heterogeneity and promote habitat diversity. However, few studies examine the success of such projects. In this study, fish density, biomass and community structure at paired restored and unrestored reaches across five tributaries of the River Thames were examined. Fish density varied among rivers and reaches but was generally higher at restored sites. Restored sites also exhibited higher overall fish biomass, attributed mainly to the presence of brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) at the River Wandle. Despite higher density and biomass values at restored sites, the community structure analysis did not identify strong links between either river or restoration status using either species-specific density or biomass.